Figures (20)  Tables (3)
    • Figure 1. 

      Main circuit topology.

    • Figure 2. 

      Rectification and filtering circuit diagram.

    • Figure 3. 

      Diagram of WPT coil. (a) Diagram of planar coil structure. (b) Diagram of parallel coaxial coil spatial structure.

    • Figure 4. 

      Single-ended flyback converter with output filtering.

    • Figure 5. 

      Single-ended flyback converter with output filtering.

    • Figure 6. 

      Diagram of main circuit simulation.

    • Figure 7. 

      Waveform of rectified output voltage.

    • Figure 8. 

      Waveform of phase shift control pulse.

    • Figure 9. 

      Waveform of inverter circuit output.

    • Figure 10. 

      Waveform of main circuit output.

    • Figure 11. 

      Single-ended flyback DC-DC converter.

    • Figure 12. 

      Result of DC-DC voltage regulation simulation.

    • Figure 13. 

      Waveform of output voltage ripple.

    • Figure 14. 

      Results of the protection circuit experiment. (a) Overcurrent protection simulation result. (b) Undervoltage protection simulation result. (c) Overvoltage protection simulation result.

    • Figure 15. 

      Prototype of the improved clamping-based single-stage flyback converter. (a) Single-stage flyback converter. (b) Improved clamping-based protection circuit.

    • Figure 16. 

      Waveform of the input voltage and current.

    • Figure 17. 

      Waveform of the gate voltage and the zero-crossing detection terminal.

    • Figure 18. 

      Waveform of inverter control voltage and WPT system primary current.

    • Figure 19. 

      Waveform of the output voltage.

    • Figure 20. 

      The waveform of the ameliorated cutoff experiment.

    • Parameter Single-ended fly-back converter Full-bridge converter
      Efficiency Moderate (85%−90%) High (90%−95%)
      Cost Low High
      Complexity Low High
      Failure points Few Multiple
      Suitability for harsh environments High Moderate

      Table 1. 

      Comparison of the single-ended flyback converter with a full-bridge converter.

    • Parameter Value Parameter Value
      Vinmax 150 V R4 5 kΩ
      IBF 0.14 A R5 and R6 1 kΩ
      UDS 200 V R7 10 kΩ
      ID 6 A R8 1.3 kΩ
      Ui 20 V R9 3.3 kΩ
      Uo 12 V R10 1 kΩ
      Dmax 0.545 R11 0.7 kΩ
      R1 9.7 kΩ R12 10 kΩ
      R2 1 kΩ R13 1 kΩ
      R3 1.3 kΩ Cp 1 μF
      La and Lp 61.89 μH Cs 0.25 μF
      Ls 247.56 μH C1 47 μF
      L3 1 mH C2 4.7 μF
      C3 0.25 μF C4 200 μF

      Table 2. 

      System parameter configuration table.

    • Technology Safety and reliability Output of voltage and power Ref.
      Laser power converters (LPC) Emphasis on efficiency and safe conversion technology Conversion efficiency: 33.8%, laser power input: 1 mW [17]
      Hybrid front-end converters, ultracapacitors, sodium-based batteries Ensures reliable operation and harmonic reduction Energy storage capacity: 3 MJ, peak power: 24 MW, load cycle: 10–60 s [18]
      Single-ended flyback converters, voltage regulation, protection circuits Intrinsically safe design, rapid response to anomalies Output voltage: 12 V, ripple: < 120 mV, protection response: 5 µs This article

      Table 3. 

      Comparison between WPT system and other mining power systems.