Figures (3)  Tables (2)

    • Figure 1. 

      Schematic diagram of the mechanisms by which metal ions influence IONPs aggregation.

    • Figure 2. 

      Schematic diagram of the mechanisms by which OMs and microbes influence IONP aggregation.

    • Figure 3. 

      Schematic diagram of microbial effects on IONP transformation.

    • Ion Inhibitory effect Mechanism Impact on transformation pathway Redox behavior during transformation
      Cd2+[65−67] Strong inhibition at high concentrations Substitution into goethite > lepidocrocite; defect-related sorption Delays ferrihydrite transform to goethite/lepidocrocite; favors
      ferrihydrite retention      		 No significant redox change; immobilized by structural incorporation
      As(V/III)[73,75,90] Strong inhibition, especially As(V) Surface complexation and structural incorporation Stabilizes lepidocrocite, inhibits
      goethite crystallization      		 As(V) → As(III) (under reducing conditions); re-adsorption occurs
      Cr(VI)[79−81] Moderate inhibition Formation of Fe(III)-Cr(III) coprecipitates Enhances lepidocrocite/goethite formation if reduction is partial Cr(VI) → Cr(III), with Cr(V) intermediate; Cr(III) incorporated
      Si (H4SiO4)[83,87,89] Strong inhibition Surface complexation (Si–O–Fe), charge reversal Suppresses lepidocrocite/goethite/hematite crystallization; stabilizes ferrihydrite No redox role; purely structural/surface interference
      Mo(VI)[91] Dose-dependent effect Surface-sorbed; potential incorporation Low Mo: favors magnetite; high Mo: favors goethite Reduced to Mo(IV) (e.g., MoO2); retained in solid
      Co2+[92] Inhibits magnetite formation Incorporated into tetra-/
      octahedral Fe sites      		 Alters Fe(II)-to-magnetite pathway; enhances goethite instead Incorporated without redox change; modifies magnetic properties
      Ce(III)[93] No inhibition; facilitates retention Strong association with Fe mineral surface Promotes Ce retention; less release Oxidized to Ce(IV) during transformation
      Sb(V)[94] Minor inhibition Adsorption/incorporation
      in Fe minerals      		 No significant pathway shift No redox change; remains Sb(V), structurally trapped
      V(V)[95] Inhibitory at high concentrations Substitution into Fe2+/Fe3+ sites Favors goethite over magnetite V(V) → V(IV)/V(III) reduction under microbial mediation

      Table 1. 

      Effects of aqueous ions on Fe(II)-catalyzed ferrihydrite/lepidocrocite transformation

    • OM property Effect on transformation Mechanism
      Carboxyl group richness[26,96] Inhibits Fh and Lp crystallization; stabilizes Fh Strong Fe–carboxylate binding; complexation with labile Fe(III)
      C/Fe molar ratio[27] Higher C/Fe inhibits Gt and Mt formation; favors Fh retention Controls surface coverage and Fe(II) interaction; not sufficient alone to predict outcome
      Molecular weight (MW)[29,30] Low MW + carboxyl-rich → inhibit; High MW →
      promote Gt formation      		 Binding affinity to labile Fe(III) varies with MW; steric/bridging effects at high MW
      Labile Fe(III) complexation[16,54,55] Prevents nucleation/crystallization of secondary minerals Fe(III)-ligand complexation inhibits polymerization
      Surface site blocking[27,99] Minor/secondary effect in some systems Blocks Fe(II) adsorption and electron transfer
      Thiol (–SH) and amino (–NH2) ligands[100,101] Promote Gt over Hm via dissolution–reprecipitation Reduce surface Fe(III) and shift transformation pathway
      Sulfide (S2–) + OM systems[103,104] OM modulates identity of Fe–S minerals formed (e.g., greigite vs pyrite) Carboxyl ligand effects on Fe–S–OM interactions

      Table 2. 

      Effects of organic matter on Fe(II)-catalyzed ferrihydrite transformation