Figures (0)  Tables (5)
    • Event Time Accident ship Cause of fire Fire situation
      1 2020 Bonhomme Richard During scheduled maintenance at the dock, the fire extinguishing system was temporarily shut down, and sparks from the construction ignited the vehicle in the deck compartment. The fire burned for 4 d, with an estimated loss of US ${\$} $1 billion and several crew members injured.
      2 2014 Kerch A fire broke out during the berthing period. The crew used a diesel generator to dry clothes in violation of regulations. It took three fireboats several hours to put out the fire.
      3 2022 Carney During the base maintenance process, a circuit failure occurred and a fire occurred, which caused the hazardous source loaded on the hull to explode. Six people were sent to the hospital, the extent of damage to the hull is unknown.
      4 2012 Tokiwa The fire originated from a generator in the engine room near the bottom of the ship, and the fuel caused the fire to spread. No casualties.
      5 2012 Miami During berthing, a fire was set in the restaurant. Hull damage, economic losses of US ${\$} $700 million.

      Table 1. 

      Fire accidents on berthed ships.

    • Indicator system First level indicator Secondary indicators Level 3 indicators
      Firefighting and rescue capabilities of ships and shores Fire rescue personnel Number of staff Rescue area per capita; Number of mobile rescue personnel
      Fire and rescue combat capability Skills assessment pass rate; Fire scene information analysis capability; Physical training compliance rate; Average number of rescues; Number of firefighters with certificates
      Fire fighting equipment Fire protection system Automatic sprinkler system normal rate; Fire alarm system availability; Water supply pipeline status; Fire protection facilities' integrity rate; Fire host status; Fire lane clear; Status of smoke prevention and exhaust systems
      Firefighting equipment Average rescue area of fire trucks; Fire extinguishing agent type configuration; Fire extinguishing agent reserve; Special equipment reserves; Fire hydrant control pump status; Water pressure of the fire hydrant at the most unfavorable point; Position of handheld firefighting equipment; Protective clothing reserves
      Fire rescue environment Intrinsic safety Hazard source distribution; Density of fire escape routes in buildings; Power station layout; Material station layout; Fire water supply source; Number of fire stations; High voltage line safety; Airport fire inspection and acceptance
      Communication environment Wireless network coverage area; Fire alarm reception line; Number of fire fighting machines; Number of communication command vehicles; Centrally control the number of devices; Number of broadcast devices; Dispatch command voice recording equipment
      Government attention Fire protection publicity and popularization
      Punishment
      Firefighting organization command Principles of organization and command Clarity of personnel authority; Current fire priority; Command object task status; Command and coordination personnel power; Implementation of personnel responsibilities
      Organizational command level Education; Fire situation analysis and processing capabilities; Fire environment familiarity; Familiarity with facilities and equipment; Age limit for fire commander
      Hazard management Inspection situation; Hidden danger correction efficiency; Maximum hidden danger inventory
      Firefighting tactical coordination Firefighting and rescue training Training area; Number of training sessions; Training achievement rate; Training equipment and facilities
      Coordinated firefighting and rescue support mechanism Combat personnel organization mobility; Fire enforcement priority; Emergency plan preparation

      Table 2. 

      Index system.

    • Expert D ab 1 D ab 2 … D abm … D abn
      P 1 [w ab11− , w ab11+ ] [w ab21− , w ab21+ ] … [w abm1− , w abm1+ ] … [w abn1− , w abn1+ ]
      P 2 [w ab12− , w ab12+ ] [w ab22− , w ab22+ ] … [w abm2− , w abm2+ ] … [w abn2− , w abn2+ ]
      … … … … … … …
      P r [w ab1r− , w ab1r+ ] [w ab2r− , w ab2r+ ] … [ w abmr− , w abmr+ ] … [ w abnr− , w abnr+ ]
      … … … … … … …
      P [w ab1p− , w ab1p+ ] [w ab2p− , w ab2p+ ] … [ w abmp− , w abmp+ ] … [ w abnp− , w abnp+ ]

      Table 3. 

      Index weight interval.

    • Expert P 1 P 2 … P r … P
      Weight K 1 K 2 … K … k p

      Table 4. 

      Expert reliability weights.

    • K = 1 K = 2 K = 3 K = 4
      D111 X111 X112 X113 X114
      D112 X121 X122 X123 X124

      Table 5. 

      Calculation results of gray category evaluation coefficients.