Figures (6)  Tables (2)
    • Figure 1. 

      Comparison of A. andraeanum cut flowers morphology on Days 0 and 25.

    • Figure 2. 

      Effects of plant growth regulators on (a) fresh weight variation, and (b) water balance in A. andraeanum cut flowers. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3 biological replicates). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's multiple range test (p < 0.05). Treatments: CK1, base solution (20g·L−1 Sucrose + 200 mg·L-18-HQ); CK2, distilled water; T1, base solution + 10 mg·L−1 6-BA; T2, base solution + 20 mg·L−1 6-BA; T3, 30 mg·L−1 6-BA; T4, base solution + 50 mg·L−1 GA3; T5, base solution + 100 mg·L−1 GA3; T6, 150 mg·L−1 GA3.

    • Figure 3. 

      Effects of plant growth regulators on (a) SOD, and (b) POD activity in A. andraeanum cut flowers. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3 biological replicates). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's multiple range test (p < 0.05). Treatments: CK1, base solution (20g·L−1 Sucrose + 200 mg·L−18-HQ); CK2, distilled water; T1, base solution + 10 mg·L−1 6-BA; T2, base solution + 20 mg·L−1 6-BA; T3, 30 mg·L−1 6-BA; T4, base solution + 50 mg·L−1 GA3; T5, base solution + 100 mg·L−1 GA3; T6, 150 mg·L−1 GA3.

    • Figure 4. 

      Effects of plant growth regulators on MDA content in A. andraeanum cut flowers. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3 biological replicates). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's multiple range test (p < 0.05). Treatments: CK1, base solution (20g·L−1 Sucrose + 200 mg·L−18-HQ); CK2, distilled water; T1, base solution + 10 mg·L−1 6-BA; T2, base solution + 20 mg·L−1 6-BA; T3, 30 mg·L−1 6-BA; T4, base solution + 50 mg·L−1 GA3; T5, base solution + 100 mg·L−1 GA3; T6, 150 mg·L−1 GA3.

    • Figure 5. 

      Effects of plant growth regulators on chlorophyll content in A. andraeanum Cut Flowers. Values are expressed as the mean ± SD (n = 3 biological replicates). Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences according to Tukey's multiple range test (p < 0.05). Treatments: CK1, base solution (20g·L−1 Sucrose + 200 mg·L−18-HQ); CK2, distilled water; T1, base solution + 10 mg·L−1 6-BA; T2, base solution + 20 mg·L−1 6-BA; T3, 30 mg·L−1 6-BA; T4, base solution + 50 mg·L−1 GA3; T5, base solution + 100 mg·L−1 GA3; T6, 150 mg·L−1 GA3.

    • Figure 6. 

      Morphological changes of cut Anthurium flowers during vase life. (a) Day 5, (b) Day 10, (c) Day 15, (d) Day 20, and (e) Day 25 after vase placement.

    • Treaments Sucrose (g·L−1) 8-HQ (mg·L−1) 6-BA (mg·L−1) GA3 (mg·L−1)
      CK1 20 200 0 0
      CK2 Distilled water
      T1 20 200 10 0
      T2 20 200 20 0
      T3 20 200 30 0
      T4 20 200 0 50
      T5 20 200 0 100
      T6 20 200 0 150

      Table 1. 

      Experimental treatment formulations.

    • Treaments Vase life (d)
      CK1 22.17 ± 0.48c
      CK2 23.17 ± 0.60abc
      T1 23.83 ± 0.60abc
      T2 22.67 ± 0.49bc
      T3 25.33 ± 0.42a
      T4 18.50 ± 0.43d
      T5 18.33 ± 0.67d
      T6 24.83 ± 0.48ab
      Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at p < 0.05.

      Table 2. 

      Effects of plant growth regulators on the vase life of A. andraeanum cut flowers.