Figures (7)  Tables (3)
    • Figure 1. 

      Characterization results obtained for MFM-170, including (a) SEM images, (b) XRD profile, (c) TGA curve, and (d) pore size distribution diagram.

    • Figure 2. 

      (a) Adsorption capacity of MFM-170 for DBT vs. oil-to-adsorbent ratio; (b) adsorption capacity of MFM-170 for DBT vs. temperature; (c) adsorption capacity of MFM-170 for DBT vs. time.

    • Figure 3. 

      (a) Adsorption capacity of MFM-170 for DBT, 4-MDBT, and DMDBT vs. time; (b) DBT adsorption capacity comparison of MFM-170 and reported adsorbents (detailed comparisons are presented in Table 1); (c) effect of toluene competitive adsorption on the adsorption capacity and distribution coefficient of DBT; (d) effect of adsorbed water on adsorption performance.

    • Figure 4. 

      Recycling performance of MFM-170.

    • Figure 5. 

      (a) FT-IR profiles of fresh and used MFM-170; (b) Cu 2p XPS spectra of fresh and used MFM-170; (c) S 2p XPS spectrum of used MFM-170; (d) XRD profiles of fresh and used MFM-170.

    • Figure 6. 

      Adsorption isotherms of (a) DBT, (d) 4-MDBT, and (g) DMDBT on MFM-170; Langmuir model fitting plots for (b) DBT, (e) 4-MDBT, and (h) DMDBT on MFM-170; Freundlich model fitting plots for (c) DBT, (f) 4-MDBT, and (i) DMDBT on MFM-170.

    • Figure 7. 

      Kinetic models for the adsorption of DBT, 4-MDBT, and DMDBT on MFM-170: (a) pseudo-first-order model, (b) pseudo-second-order model, and (c) Weber–Morris intraparticle diffusion model.

    • Sample Adsorbate Adsorption capacity (mg S/g) Ref.
      MOF-505 DBT 39.04 [14]
      MIL-101(Cr) DBT 23.04 [20]
      SBA-15 DBT 16.23 [21]
      Ce-BN DBT 48.40 [22]
      NPC DBT 45.14 [23]
      FeNC-700 DBT 25.08 [24]
      IFMC-16 DBT 49.92 [25]
      Cu-N-C DBT 35.32 [26]
      HCl treated AC DBT 4.28 [27]
      Sn/AC DBT 4.35 [28]
      Na/Y DBT 17.63 [11]
      Ni/Y DBT 14.43 [11]
      MFM-170 DBT 57.00 This work

      Table 1. 

      Comparison of the DBT adsorption capacity on various materials.

    • Temperature (°C)AdsorbatesLangmuirFreundlich
      qmax (mg S/g)KLR2KFnR2
      30DBT90.910.00210.97341.07371.71230.9923
      4-MDBT181.820.00050.95560.18031.18670.9934
      DMDBT76.920.00110.94730.39601.48590.9906
      40DBT103.090.00170.98020.81401.58910.9913
      4-MDBT370.370.00020.63160.10311.06810.9928
      DMDBT144.930.00050.92140.19261.22700.9907
      50DBT90.090.00230.96182.03522.04210.9908
      4-MDBT476.190.00020.47070.08871.04900.9931
      DMDBT109.890.00070.85360.32121.37820.9932

      Table 2. 

      Fitted parameters of Langmuir and Freundlich models.

    • Adsorbates Adsorption stage Fitting equation Kid (mg S/g/min0.5) C (mg S/g) R2
      DBT 1 y = 1.8363x + 37.651 1.8363 37.651 0.9646
      2 y = 0.0801x + 54.698 0.0801 54.698 0.9868
      4-MDBT 1 y = 1.1392x + 21.457 1.1392 21.457 0.9755
      2 y = 0.1075x + 41.939 0.1075 41.939 0.9920
      DMDBT 1 y = 3.1243x + 23.029 3.1243 23.029 0.9701
      2 y = 0.0222x + 37.367 0.0222 37.367 0.9691

      Table 3. 

      Kinetic parameters of the Weber–Morris intraparticle diffusion model for the adsorption of DBT, 4-MDBT, and DMDBT on MFM-170.