Pan Y, Birdsey RA, Phillips OL, Jackson RB. 2013. The structure, distribution, and biomass of the World's forests. Anual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 44:593−622

doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135914

Wei H. 2021. Inaugural Editorial. Forestry Research 1:1

doi: 10.48130/FR-2021-0001

Plomion C, Bastien C, Bogeat-Triboulot MB, Bouffier L, Déjardin A, et al. 2016. Forest tree genomics: 10 achievements from the past 10 years and future prospects. Annals of Forest Science 73:77−103

doi: 10.1007/s13595-015-0488-3

Allona I, Kirst M, Boerjan W, Strauss S, Sederoff R. 2019. Editorial: Forest Genomics and Biotechnology. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:1187

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01187

Schultz JA, Coleman HD. 2021. Pectin and xylan biosynthesis in poplar: Implications and opportunities for biofuels production. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:712083

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.712083

Cairns MA, Brown S, Helmer EH, Baumgardner GA. 1997. Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests. Oecologia 111:1−11

doi: 10.1007/s004420050201

Houghton RA, Hall F, Goetz SJ. 2009. Importance of biomass in the global carbon cycle. Biogeosciences 114:G00E03


de Vries L, Guevara-Rozo S, Cho M, Liu LY, Renneckar S, et al. 2021. Tailoring renewable materials via plant biotechnology. Biotechnology For Biofuels 14:167

doi: 10.1186/s13068-021-02010-z

Fukuda H, Komamine A. 1980. Establishment of an experimental system for the study of tracheary element differentiation from single cells isolated from the mesophyll of Zinnia elegans. Plant Physiology 65:57−60

doi: 10.1104/pp.65.1.57

Kubo M, Udagawa M, Nishikubo N, Horiguchi G, Yamaguchi M, et al. 2005. Transcription switches for protoxylem and metaxylem vessel formation. Genes & Development 19:1855−60

doi: 10.1101/gad.1331305

Wang D, Chen Y, Li W, Li Q, Lu M, et al. 2021. Vascular Cambium: The Source of Wood Formation. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:700928

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.700928

Ko JH, Kim WC, Kim JY, Ahn SJ, Han KH. 2012. MYB46-mediated transcriptional regulation of secondary wall biosynthesis. Molecular Plant 5:961−63

doi: 10.1093/mp/sss076

Zhu Y, Li L. 2021. Multi-layered regulation of plant cell wall thickening. Plant and Cell Physiology 62:1867−73

doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcab152

Xu C, Shen Y, He F, Fu X, Yu H, et al. 2019. Auxin-mediated Aux/IAA-ARF-HB signaling cascade regulates secondary xylem development in Populus. New Phtologist 222:752−67

doi: 10.1111/nph.15658

Shi D, Lebovka I, López-Salmerón V, Sanchez P, Greb T. 2019. Bifacial cambium stem cells generate xylem and phloem during radial plant growth. Development 146:dev171355

doi: 10.1242/dev.171355

Smetana O, Mäkilä R, Lyu M, Amiryousefi A, Sanchez Rodriguez F, et al. 2019. High levels of auxin signalling define the stem-cell organizer of the vascular cambium. Nature 565:485−89

doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0837-0

Chiang MH, Greb T. 2019. How to organize bidirectional tissue production. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 51:15−21

doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2019.03.003

Wenzel CL, Schuetz M, Yu Q, Mattsson J. 2007. Dynamics of MONOPTEROS and PIN-FORMED1 expression during leaf vein pattern formation in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Journal 49:387−98

doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02977.x

De Rybel B, Adibi M, Breda AS, Wendrich JR, Smit ME, et al. 2014. Plant development. Integration of growth and patterning during vascular tissue formation in Arabidopsis. Science 345:1255215

doi: 10.1126/science.1255215

Ohashi-Ito K, Saegusa M, Iwamoto K, Oda Y, Katayama H, et al. 2014. A bHLH complex activates vascular cell division via cytokinin action in root apical meristem. Current Biology 24:2053−58

doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.07.050

Smet W, Sevilem I, de Luis Balaguer MA, Wybouw B, Mor E, et al. 2019. DOF2.1 controls cytokinin-dependent vascular cell proliferation downstream of TMO5/LHW. Current Biology 29:520−9.e6

doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.12.041

Hardtke CS, Berleth T. 1998. The Arabidopsis gene MONOPTEROS encodes a transcription factor mediating embryo axis formation and vascular development. The EMBO Journal 17:1405−11

doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.5.1405

Chen Y, Tong S, Jiang Y, Ai F, Feng Y, et al. 2021. Transcriptional landscape of highly lignified poplar stems at single-cell resolution. Genome Biology 22:319

doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02537-2

Li H, Dai X, Huang X, Xu M, Wang Q, et al. 2021. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals a high-resolution cell atlas of xylem in Populus. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 63:1906−21

doi: 10.1111/jipb.13159

Chen A, Liao S, Cheng M, Ma K, Wu L, et al. 2022. Spatiotemporal transcriptomic atlas of mouse organogenesis using DNA nanoball-patterned arrays. Cell 185:1777−92 e21

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.003

Cao HX, Vu GTH, Gailing O. 2022. From Genome sequencing to CRISPR-based genome editing for climate-resilient forest trees. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23:966

doi: 10.3390/ijms23020966

Pak S, Li C. 2022. Progress and challenges in applying CRISPR/Cas techniques to the genome editing of trees. Forestry Research 2:6

doi: 10.48130/FR-2022-0006

Fan D, Liu T, Li C, Jiao B, Li S, et al. 2015. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Populus in the first generation. Scientific Reports 5:12217

doi: 10.1038/srep12217

van Zeijl A, Wardhani TAK, Seifi Kalhor M, Rutten L, Bu F, et al. 2018. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mutagenesis of four putative symbiosis genes of the tropical tree Parasponia andersonii reveals novel phenotypes. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:284

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00284

Dai Y, Hu G, Dupas A, Medina L, Blandels N, et al. 2020. Implementing the CRISPR/Cas9 technology in Eucalyptus hairy roots using wood-related genes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21:3408

doi: 10.3390/ijms21103408

Dai X, Yang X, Wang C, Fan Y, Xin S, et al. 2021. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in Hevea brasiliensis. Industrial Crops And Products 164:113418

doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113418

Fan Y, Xin S, Dai X, Yang X, Huang H, et al. 2020. Efficient genome editing of rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis) protoplasts using CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Industrial Crops And Products 146:112146

doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112146

Poovaiah C, Phillips L, Geddes B, Reeves C, Sorieul M, Thorlby G. 2021. Genome editing with CRISPR/Cas9 in Pinus radiata (D. Don). BMC Plant Biology 21:363

doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-03143-x

Pavese V, Moglia A, Corredoira E, Martínez MT, Torello Marinoni D, et al. 2021. First report of CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in Castanea sativa Mill. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:728516

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.728516

Pramanik D, Shelake RM, Kim MJ, Kim JY. 2021. CRISPR-mediated engineering across the central dogma in plant biology for basic research and crop improvement. Molecular Plant 14:127−50

doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.11.002

Hassan MM, Zhang Y, Yuan G, De K, Chen JG, et al. 2021. Construct design for CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing in plants. Trends in Plant Science 26:1133−52

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.06.015

Nidhi S, Anand U, Oleksak P, Tripathi P, Lal JA, et al. 2021. Novel CRISPR–cas systems: An updated review of the current achievements, applications, and future research perspectives. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:3327

doi: 10.3390/ijms22073327

Lu Y, Tian Y, Shen R, Yao Q, Wang M, et al. 2020. Targeted, efficient sequence insertion and replacement in rice. Nature Biotechnology 38:1402−7

doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0581-5

Li S, Li J, He Y, Xu M, Zhang J, et al. 2019. Precise gene replacement in rice by RNA transcript-templated homologous recombination. Nature Biotechnology 37:445−50

doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0065-7

Nishida K, Arazoe T, Yachie N, Banno S, Kakimoto M, et al. 2016. Targeted nucleotide editing using hybrid prokaryotic and vertebrate adaptive immune systems. Science 353:aaf8729

doi: 10.1126/science.aaf8729

Anzalone AV, Randolph PB, Davis JR, Sousa AA, Koblan LW, et al. 2019. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA. Nature 576:149−57

doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1711-4

Komor AC, Kim YB, Packer MS, Zuris JA, Liu DR. 2016. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage. Nature 533:420−24

doi: 10.1038/nature17946

Chanoca A, de Vries L, Boerjan W. 2019. Lignin engineering in forest trees. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:912

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00912

Dort EN, Tanguay P, Hamelin RC. 2020. CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing: An unexplored frontier for forest pathology. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:1126

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01126

Fang Q, Wang X, Wang H, Tang X, Liu C, et al. 2020. The poplar R2R3 MYB transcription factor PtrMYB94 coordinates with abscisic acid signaling to improve drought tolerance in plants. Tree Physiology 40:46−59

doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpz113

Su Y, Guo A, Huang Y, Wang Y, Hua J. 2020. GhCIPK6a increases salt tolerance in transgenic upland cotton by involving in ROS scavenging and MAPK signaling pathways. BMC Plant Biology 20:421

doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02548-4

Xiu Y, Iqbal A, Zhu C, Wu G, Chang Y, et al. 2016. Improvement and transcriptome analysis of root architecture by overexpression of Fraxinus pennsylvanica DREB2A transcription factor in Robinia pseudoacacia L. 'Idaho'. Plant Biotechnology Journal 14:1456−69

doi: 10.1111/pbi.12509

Li R, Liu L, Dominic K, Wang T, Fan T, et al. 2018. Mulberry (Morus alba) MmSK gene enhances tolerance to drought stress in transgenic mulberry. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 132:603−11

doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2018.10.007

Bewg WP, Ci D, Tsai CJ. 2018. Genome editing in trees: from multiple repair pathways to long-term stability. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:1732

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01732

Polle A, Chen SL, Eckert C, Harfouche A. 2019. Engineering Drought Resistance in Forest Trees. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:1875

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01875

Molla KA, Yang Y. 2019. CRISPR/Cas-mediated base editing: technical considerations and practical applications. Trends in Biotechnology 37:1121−42

doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.03.008

Gaudelli NM, Komor AC, Rees HA, Packer MS, Badran AH, et al. 2017. Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage. Nature 551:464−71

doi: 10.1038/nature24644

Zhao D, Li J, Li S, Xin X, Hu M, et al. 2021. Glycosylase base editors enable C-to-A and C-to-G base changes. Nature Biotechnology 39:35−40

doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0592-2

Kurt IC, Zhou R, Iyer S, Garcia SP, Miller BR, et al. 2021. CRISPR C-to-G base editors for inducing targeted DNA transversions in human cells. Nature Biotechnology 39:41−6

doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0609-x

Chen L, Park JE, Paa P, Rajakumar PD, Prekop HT, et al. 2021. Programmable C:G to G:C genome editing with CRISPR-Cas9-directed base excision repair proteins. Nature Communication 12:1348

doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21559-9

Choi M, Yun JY, Kim JH, Kim JS, Kim ST. 2021. The efficacy of CRISPR-mediated cytosine base editing with the RPS5a promoter in Arabidopsis thaliana. Scientific Reports 11:8087

doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-87669-y

Molla KA, Sretenovic S, Bansal KC, Qi Y. 2021. Precise plant genome editing using base editors and prime editors. Nature Plants 7:1166−87

doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00991-1

Gross A, Schoendube J, Zimmermann S, Steeb M, Zengerle R, et al. 2015. Technologies for single-cell isolation. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 16:16897−919

doi: 10.3390/ijms160816897

Zilionis R, Nainys J, Veres A, Savova V, Zemmour D, et al. 2017. Single-cell barcoding and sequencing using droplet microfluidics. Nature Protocols 12:44−73

doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.154

Klein AM, Mazutis L, Akartuna I, Tallapragada N, Veres A, et al. 2015. Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell 161:1187−201

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.04.044

Zheng GXY, Terry JM, Belgrader P, Ryvkin P, Bent ZW, et al. 2017. Massively parallel digital transcriptional profiling of single cells. Nature Communications 8:14049

doi: 10.1038/ncomms14049

Macosko EZ, Basu A, Satija R, Nemesh J, Shekhar K, et al. 2015. Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161:1202−14

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.002

Ryu KH, Huang L, Kang HM, Schiefelbein J. 2019. Single-cell RNA sequencing resolves molecular relationships among individual plant cells. Plant Physiology 179:1444−56

doi: 10.1104/pp.18.01482

Zhang T, Xu Z, Shang G, Wang J. 2019. A single-cell RNA sequencing profiles the developmental landscape of Arabidopsis root. Molecular Plant 12:648−60

doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2019.04.004

Shulse CN, Cole BJ, Ciobanu D, Lin J, Yoshinaga Y, et al. 2019. High-throughput single-cell transcriptome profiling of plant cell types. Cell Reports 27:2241−2247.E4

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.04.054

Denyer T, Ma X, Klesen S, Scacchi E, Nieselt K, et al. 2019. Spatiotemporal developmental trajectories in the Arabidopsis root revealed using high-throughput single-cell RNA sequencing. Developmental Cell 48:840−852.E5

doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.02.022

Jean-Baptiste K, McFaline-Figueroa JL, Alexandre CM, Dorrity MW, Saunders L, et al. 2019. Dynamics of gene expression in single root cells of Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Cell 31:993−1011

doi: 10.1105/tpc.18.00785

Shahan R, Hsu CW, Nolan TM, Cole BJ, Taylor IW, et al. 2022. A single-cell Arabidopsis root atlas reveals developmental trajectories in wild-type and cell identity mutants. Developmental Cell 57:543−560.e9

doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2022.01.008

Zhang T, Chen Y, Liu Y, Lin W, Wang J. 2021. Single-cell transcriptome atlas and chromatin accessibility landscape reveal differentiation trajectories in the rice root. Nature Communications 12:2053

doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22352-4

Liu Q, Liang Z, Feng D, Jiang S, Wang Y, et al. 2021. Transcriptional landscape of rice roots at the single-cell resolution. Molecular Plant 14:384−94

doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.12.014

Zhang T, Chen Y, Wang J. 2021. A single-cell analysis of the Arabidopsis vegetative shoot apex. Developmental Cell 56:1056−74

doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.02.021

Song Q, Ando A, Jiang N, Ikeda Y, Chen ZJ. 2020. Single-cell RNA-seq analysis reveals ploidy-dependent and cell-specific transcriptome changes in Arabidopsis female gametophytes. Genome Biology 21:178

doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02094-0

Nelms B, Walbot V. 2019. Defining the developmental program leading to meiosis in maize. Science 364:52−56

doi: 10.1126/science.aav6428

Satterlee JW, Strable J, Scanlon MJ. 2020. Plant stem-cell organization and differentiation at single-cell resolution. PNAS 117:33689−99

doi: 10.1073/pnas.2018788117

Xu X, Crow M, Rice BR, Li F, Harris B, et al. 2021. Single-cell RNA sequencing of developing maize ears facilitates functional analysis and trait candidate gene discovery. Developmental Cell 56:557−568.E6

doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.12.015

Kim JY, Symeonidi E, Pang TY, Denyer T, Weidauer D, et al. 2021. Distinct identities of leaf phloem cells revealed by single cell transcriptomics. The Plant Cell 33:511−30

doi: 10.1093/plcell/koaa060

Serrano-Ron L, Perez-Garcia P, Sanchez-Corrionero A, Gude I, Cabrera J, et al. 2021. Reconstruction of lateral root formation through single-cell RNA sequencing reveals order of tissue initiation. Molecular Plant 14:1362−78

doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2021.05.028

Liu Z, Zhou Y, Guo J, Li J, Tian Z, et al. 2020. Global dynamic molecular profiling of stomatal lineage cell development by single-cell RNA sequencing. Molecular Plant 13:1178−93

doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.010

Liu H, Hu D, Du P, Wang L, Liang X, et al. 2021. Single-cell RNA-seq describes the transcriptome landscape and identifies critical transcription factors in the leaf blade of the allotetraploid peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Plant Biotechnology Journal 19:2261−76

doi: 10.1111/pbi.13656

Gala HP, Lanctot A, Jean-Baptiste K, Guiziou S, Chu JC, et al. 2021. A single-cell view of the transcriptome during lateral root initiation in Arabidopsis thaliana. The Plant Cell 33:2197−220

doi: 10.1093/plcell/koab101

Lopez-Anido CB, Vatén A, Smoot NK, Sharma N, Guo V, et al. 2021. Single-cell resolution of lineage trajectories in the Arabidopsis stomatal lineage and developing leaf. Developmental Cell 56:1043−1055.E4

doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.03.014

Birnbaum K, Shasha DE, Wang JY, Jung JW, Lambert GM, et al. 2003. A gene expression map of the Arabidopsis root. Science 302:1956−60

doi: 10.1126/science.1090022

Farmer A, Thibivilliers S, Ryu KH, Schiefelbein J, Libault M. 2021. Single-nucleus RNA and ATAC sequencing reveals the impact of chromatin accessibility on gene expression in Arabidopsis roots at the single-cell level. Molecular Plant 14:372−83

doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2021.01.001

Deal RB, Henikoff S. 2010. A simple method for gene expression and chromatin profiling of individual cell types within a tissue. Developmental Cell 18:1030−40

doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.05.013

Reynoso MA, Pauluzzi GC, Kajala K, Cabanlit S, Velasco J, et al. 2018. Nuclear transcriptomes at high resolution using retooled INTACT. Plant Physiology 176:270−81

doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00688

Palovaara J, Weijers D. 2019. Adapting INTACT to analyse cell-type-specific transcriptomes and nucleocytoplasmic mRNA dynamics in the Arabidopsis embryo. Plant Reproduction 32:113−21

doi: 10.1007/s00497-018-0347-0

Del Toro-De León G, Köhler C. 2019. Endosperm-specific transcriptome analysis by applying the INTACT system. Plant Reproduction 32:55−61

doi: 10.1007/s00497-018-00356-3

Pirrello J, Deluche C, Frangne N, Gévaudant F, Maza E, et al. 2018. Transcriptome profiling of sorted endoreduplicated nuclei from tomato fruits: how the global shift in expression ascribed to DNA ploidy influences RNA-Seq data normalization and interpretation. The Plant Journal 93:387−98

doi: 10.1111/tpj.13783

Conde D, Triozzi PM, Balmant KM, Doty AL, Miranda M, et al. 2021. A robust method of nuclei isolation for single-cell RNA sequencing of solid tissues from the plant genus Populus. PLoS One 16:e0251149

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251149

Turco GM, Rodriguez-Medina J, Siebert S, Han D, Valderrama-Gómez MÁ, et al. 2019. Molecular mechanisms driving switch behavior in xylem cell differentiation. Cell Reports 28:342−351.E4

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.06.041

Giacomello S, Salmén F, Terebieniec BK, Vickovic S, Navarro JF, et al. 2017. Spatially resolved transcriptome profiling in model plant species. Nature Plants 3:17061

doi: 10.1038/nplants.2017.61

Giacomello S, Lundeberg J. 2018. Preparation of plant tissue to enable Spatial Transcriptomics profiling using barcoded microarrays. Nature Protocols 13:2425−46

doi: 10.1038/s41596-018-0046-1

Dunwell JM. 2010. Haploids in flowering plants: origins and exploitation. Plant Biotechnology Journal 8:377−424

doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2009.00498.x

Coe EH Jr . 1959. A line of maize with high haploid frequency. The American Naturalist 93:381−2

doi: 10.1086/282098

Jain SM, Sopory SK, Veilleux R. 1996. In Vitro Haploid Production in Higher Plants: Volume 2: Applications. Springer Science & Business Media


Maluszynski M, Kasha K, Forster B, Szarejko I (eds.). 2003. Doubled haploid production in crop plants: anual. New York: Springer Science & Business Media


Xu L, Najeeb U, Tang G, Gu H, Zhang G, et al. 2007. Haploid and doubled haploid technology. Advances in Botanical Research 45:181−216

doi: 10.1016/S0065-2296(07)45007-8

Piosik Ł, Zenkteler E, Zenkteler M. 2016. Development of haploid embryos and plants of Lactuca sativa induced by distant pollination with Helianthus annuus and H. tuberosus. Euphytica 208:439−51

doi: 10.1007/s10681-015-1578-x

Godbole M, Murthy HN. 2012. In vitro production of haploids via parthenogenesis in culinary melon (Cucumis melo var. acidulus). Indian Journal of Biotechnology 11:495−97


Soleimani A. 2012. Production of haploid lines from parthenogenetic Iranian melon plants obtained of irradiated pollen (Cucumis melo L.). International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences 3:1585−89


Deng Y, Tang B, Zhou X, Fu W, Tao L, et al. 2020. Direct regeneration of haploid or doubled haploid plantlets in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) through ovary culture. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 142:253−68

doi: 10.1007/s11240-020-01839-w

Zayachkovskaya T, Domblides E, Zayachkovsky V, Kan L, Domblides A, et al. 2021. Production of Gynogenic Plants of Red Beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in Unpollinated Ovule Culture In Vitro. Plants 10:2703

doi: 10.3390/plants10122703

Castillo AM, Valero-Rubira I, Allué S, Costar MA, Vallés MP. 2021. Bread Wheat Doubled Haploid Production by Anther Culture. Methods in Molecular Biology 2287:227−44

doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1315-3_11

Kurtar ES, Seymen M. 2021. Gynogenesis in Cucurbita Species. Methods in Molecular Biology 2289:123−33

doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1331-3_8

Galán-Ávila A, García-Fortea E, Prohens J, Herraiz FJ. 2021. Microgametophyte Development in Cannabis sativa L. and First Androgenesis Induction Through Microspore Embryogenesis. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:669424

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.669424

Kang X, Wei H. 2022. Breeding polyploid Populus: progress and perspective. Forestry Research 2:4

doi: 10.48130/FR-2022-0004

Winton LL, Einspahr DW. 1968. The use of heat-treated pollen for aspen haploid production. Forest Science406−7


Stettler R, Bawa K. 1971. Experimental induction of haploid parthenogenesis in black cottonwood (Populus trichocarpa T. & G. ex Hook.). Silvae Genetica 20:15−25


Illies Z. 1974. Induction of haploid parthenogenesis in aspen by postpollination treatment with Toluidine-blue. Silvae Genetica 23:221−26


Wu K, Xu M. 1984. Induction of matrilinear haploid plants from unpollinated ovaries of poplar invitro. Kexue Tongbao 29:141−42


Li Y, Huang S, Zhang J, Bu F, Lin T, et al. 2016. A protocol of homozygous haploid callus induction from endosperm of Taxus chinensis Rehd. var. mairei. SpringerPlus 5:1−9

doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2320-4

Li Y, Wei H, Yang J, Du K, Li J, et al. 2020. High-quality de novo assembly of the Eucommia ulmoides haploid genome provides new insights into evolution and rubber biosynthesis. Horticulture Research 7:183

doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-00406-w

Wang C, Chu Z, Sun C. 1975. The induction of pollen plants of Populus. Acta Botanica Sinica 17:56−62


Deutsch F, Kumlehn J, Ziegenhagen B, Fladung M. 2004. Stable haploid poplar callus lines from immature pollen culture. Physiologia Plantarum 120:613−22

doi: 10.1111/j.0031-9317.2004.0266.x

Li Y, Li H, Chen Z, Ji L, Ye M, et al. 2013. Haploid plants from anther cultures of poplar (Populus × beijingensis). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 114:39−48

doi: 10.1007/s11240-013-0303-5

Yang J, Li K, Li C, Li J, Zhao B, et al. 2018. In vitro anther culture and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of the AP1 gene from Salix integra Linn. in haploid poplar (Populus simonii × P. nigra). Journal of Forestry Research 29:321−30

doi: 10.1007/s11676-017-0453-0

Ravi M, Chan SWL. 2010. Haploid plants produced by centromere-mediated genome elimination. Nature 464:615−18

doi: 10.1038/nature08842

Kelliher T, Starr D, Su X, Tang G, Chen Z, et al. 2019. One-step genome editing of elite crop germplasm during haploid induction. Nature Biotechnology 37:287−92

doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0038-x

Wang N, Gent JI, Dawe RK. 2021. Haploid induction by a maize cenh3 null mutant. Science Advances 7:eabe2299

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abe2299

Castellanos-Hernández OA, Rodríguez-Sahagún A, Acevedo-Hernández GJ, Herrera-Estrella LR. 2011. Genetic Transformation of Forest Trees. In Genetic Transformation, ed. Alvarez M. Rijeka: IntechOpen. pp. 191−214. http://doi.org/10.5772/24354


Song G, Prieto H, Orbovic V. 2019. Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation of Tree Fruit Crops: Methods, Progress, and Challenges. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:266

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00226

Giri CC, Shyamkumar B, Anjaneyulu C. 2004. Progress in tissue culture, genetic transformation and applications of biotechnology to trees: an overview. Trees 18:115−35

doi: 10.1007/s00468-003-0287-6

Fillatti JJ, Sellmer J, Mccown B, Haissig B, Comai L. 1987. Agrobacterium Mediated Transformation and Regeneration of Populus. Molecular and General Genetics MGG 206:192−9

doi: 10.1007/BF00333574

Huang Y, Diner AM, Karnosky DF. 1991. Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated genetic transformation and regeneration of a conifer: Larix decidua. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant 27:201−7

doi: 10.1007/BF02632217

Bruegmann T, Polak O, Deecke K, Nietsch J, Fladung M. 2019. Poplar Transformation. In Transgenic Plants, Methods in Molecular Biology, eds. Kumar S, Barone P, Smith M. vol 1864. New York: Humana Press. pp. 165–77 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-8778-8_12


Litz RE, Padilla G. 2012. Genetic Transformation of Fruit Trees. In Genomics of Tree Crops, eds. Schnell R, Priyadarshan P. New York: Springer. pp. 117−53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-0920-5_5


Jayashree R, Rekha K, Venkatachalam P, Uratsu SL, Dandekar AM, et al. 2003. Genetic transformation and regeneration of rubber tree (Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg) transgenic plants with a constitutive version of an anti-oxidative stress superoxide dismutase gene. Plant Cell Reports 22:201−9

doi: 10.1007/s00299-003-0666-x

Tang W, Newton RJ. 2003. Genetic transformation of conifers and its application in forest biotechnology. Plant Cell Reports 22:1−15

doi: 10.1007/s00299-003-0670-1

Cervera M, Navarro A, Navarro L, Peña L. 2008. Production of transgenic adult plants from clementine mandarin by enhancing cell competence for transformation and regeneration. Tree Physiology 28:55−66

doi: 10.1093/treephys/28.1.55

Dong JZ, Jia SR. 1991. High efficiency plant regeneration from cotyledons of watermelon (Citrullus vulgaris Schrad). Plant Cell Reports 9:559−62

doi: 10.1007/BF00232331

Baker BS, Bhatia SK. 1993. Factors effecting adventitious shoot regeneration from leaf explants of quince (Cydonia oblonga). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 35:273−77

doi: 10.1007/BF00037281

Becerra D, Forero A, Góngora GA. 2004. Age and physiological condition of donor plants affect in vitro morphogenesis in leaf explants of Passiflora edulis f. flavicarpa. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 79:87−90

doi: 10.1023/B:TICU.0000049440.10767.29

Zhang T, Lian H, Tang H, Dolezal K, Zhou C, et al. 2015. An intrinsic microRNA timer regulates progressive decline in shoot regenerative capacity in plants. The Plant Cell 27:349−60

doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.135186

Raspor M, Motyka V, Kaleri AR, Ninković S, Tubić L, et al. 2021. Integrating the roles for cytokinin and auxin in de novo shoot organogenesis: from hormone uptake to signaling outputs. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:8554

doi: 10.3390/ijms22168554

Hill K, Schaller GE. 2013. Enhancing plant regeneration in tissue culture: a molecular approach through manipulation of cytokinin sensitivity. Plant Signaling and Behavior 8:e25709

doi: 10.4161/psb.25709

Yang J, Zhao B, Kim YB, Zhou C, Li C, et al. 2013. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Phellodendron amurense Rupr. using mature-seed explants. Molecular Biology Reports 40:281−88

doi: 10.1007/s11033-012-2059-0

Yang J, Zhao S, Zhao B, Li C. 2018. Overexpression of TaLEA3 induces rapid stomatal closure under drought stress in Phellodendron amurense Rupr. Plant Science 277:100−9

doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.09.022

Yang J, Zhou C, Zhao B, Jin C, Zhang T, et al. 2011. Rapid direct adventitious shoot organogenesis and plant regeneration from mature seed explants of Phellodendron amurense Rupr. Journal of Medicinal Plant Research 5:4560−65


Yang J, Yi J, Yang C, Li CJTP. 2013. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated genetic transformation of Salix matsudana Koidz. using mature seeds. Tree Physiology 33:628−39

doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpt038

Yang J, Chen Z, Wu S, Cui Y, Zhang L, et al. 2015. Overexpression of the Tamarix hispida ThMT3 gene increases copper tolerance and adventitious root induction in Salix matsudana Koidz. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 121:469−79

doi: 10.1007/s11240-015-0717-3

Teixeira da Silva JA, Malabadi RB. 2012. Factors affecting somatic embryogenesis in conifers. Journal of Forestry Research 23:503−15

doi: 10.1007/s11676-012-0266-0

Hazubska-Przyby T, Bojarczuk K. 2016. Tree somatic embryogenesis in science and forestry. Dendrobiology 76:105−16

doi: 10.12657/denbio.076.010

Ikeuchi M, Ogawa Y, Iwase A, Sugimoto K. 2016. Plant regeneration: cellular origins and molecular mechanisms. Development 143:1442−51

doi: 10.1242/dev.134668

Duan H, Maren NA, Ranney TG, Liu WJOPR. 2022. New opportunities for using WUS/BBM and GRF-GIF genes to enhance genetic transformation of ornamental plants. Ornamental Plant Research 2:4

doi: 10.48130/OPR-2022-0004

Lowe K, Wu E, Wang N, Hoerster G, Hastings C, et al. 2016. Morphogenic regulators Baby boom and Wuschel improve monocot transformation. The Plant Cell 28:1998−2015

doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00124

Debernardi JM, Tricoli DM, Ercoli MF, Hayta S, Ronald P, et al. 2020. A GRF-GIF chimeric protein improves the regeneration efficiency of transgenic plants. Nature Biotechnology 38:1274−79

doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0703-0

Liu B, Zhang J, Yang Z, Matsui A, Seki M, et al. 2018. PtWOX11 acts as master regulator conducting the expression of key transcription factors to induce de novo shoot organogenesis in poplar. Plant Molecular Biology 98:389−406

doi: 10.1007/s11103-018-0786-x

Chen J, Tomes S, Gleave AP, Hall W, Luo Z, et al. 2022. Significant improvement of apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) transgenic plant production by pre-transformation with a Baby boom transcription factor. Horticulture Research 9:uhab014

doi: 10.1093/hr/uhab014

Xu L, Huang H. 2014. Genetic and epigenetic controls of plant regeneration. Current Topics In Developmental Biology 108:1−33

doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-391498-9.00009-7

Nagle M, Déjardin A, Pilate G, Strauss SH. 2018. Opportunities for Innovation in Genetic Transformation of Forest Trees. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:1443

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01443

Luo G, Palmgren M. 2021. GRF-GIF Chimeras Boost Plant Regeneration. Trends in Plant Science 26:201−4

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2020.12.001

Ellison EE, Nagalakshmi U, Gamo ME, Huang PJ, Dinesh-Kumar S, et al. 2020. Multiplexed heritable gene editing using RNA viruses and mobile single guide RNAs. Nature Plants 6:620−24

doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-0670-y

Ji X, Yang B, Wang D. 2020. Achieving plant genome editing while bypassing tissue culture. Trends in Plant Science 25:427−29

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2020.02.011

Yang J, Lan L, Jin Y, Yu N, Wang D, et al. 2022. Mechanisms underlying legume-rhizobium symbioses. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 64:244−67

doi: 10.1111/jipb.13207

Leary JK, Singleton PW, Borthakur D. 2004. Canopy nodulation of the endemic tree legume Acacia koa in the mesic forests of Hawaii. Ecology 85:3151−75

doi: 10.1890/03-3168

Honda MDH, Borthakur D. 2020. Mimosine facilitates metallic cation uptake by plants through formation of mimosine-cation complexes. Plant Molecular Biology 102:431−45

doi: 10.1007/s11103-019-00956-1

Borthakur D, Soedarjo M, Fox PM, Webb DT. 2003. The mid genes of Rhizobium sp strain TAL1145 are required for degradation of mimosine into 3-hydroxy-4-pyridone and are inducible by mimosine. Microbiology 149:537−46

doi: 10.1099/mic.0.25954-0

Negi VS, Bingham JP, Li QX, Borthakur D. 2013. midD-encoded 'rhizomimosinase' from Rhizobium sp. strain TAL1145 is a C-N lyase that catabolizes L-mimosine into 3-hydroxy-4-pyridone, pyruvate and ammonia. Amino Acids 44:1537−47

doi: 10.1007/s00726-013-1479-z

Awaya JD, Fox PM, Borthakur D. 2005. pyd genes of Rhizobium sp. strain TAL1145 are required for degradation of 3-hydroxy-4-pyridone, an aromatic intermediate in mimosine metabolism. Journal of Bacteriology 187:4480−7

doi: 10.1128/JB.187.13.4480-4487.2005

Soedarjo M, Borthakur D. 1998. Mimosine, a toxin produced by the tree-legume Leucaena provides a nodulation competition advantage to mimosine-degrading Rhizobium strains. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 30:1605−13

doi: 10.1016/S0038-0717(97)00180-6

Soedarjo M, Hemscheidt TK, Borthakur D. 1994. Mimosine, a toxin present in leguminous trees (Leucaena spp.), induces a mimosine-degrading enzyme activity in some Rhizobium strains. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 60:4268−72

doi: 10.1128/aem.60.12.4268-4272.1994

Tuskan GA, Difazio S, Jansson S, Bohlmann J, Grigoriev I, et al. 2006. The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray). Science 313:1596−604

doi: 10.1126/science.1128691

Marks RA, Hotaling S, Frandsen PB, VanBuren R. 2021. Representation and participation across 20 years of plant genome sequencing. Nature Plants 7:1571−78

doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-01031-8

Wenger AM, Peluso P, Rowell WJ, Chang PC, Hall RJ, et al. 2019. Accurate circular consensus long-read sequencing improves variant detection and assembly of a human genome. Nature Biotechnology 37:1155−62

doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0217-9

Neale DB, Zimin AV, Zaman S, Scott AD, Shrestha B, et al. 2022. Assembled and annotated 26.5 Gbp coast redwood genome: a resource for estimating evolutionary adaptive potential and investigating hexaploid origin. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 12:jkab380

doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab380

Wang C, Liu C, Roqueiro D, Grimm D, Schwab R, et al. 2015. Genome-wide analysis of local chromatin packing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genome Research 25:246−56

doi: 10.1101/gr.170332.113

Michael TP, Bryant D, Gutierrez R, Borisjuk N, Chu P, et al. 2017. Comprehensive definition of genome features in Spirodela polyrhiza by high-depth physical mapping and short-read DNA sequencing strategies. The Plant Journal 89:617−35

doi: 10.1111/tpj.13400

Niu S, Li J, Bo W, Yang W, Zuccolo A, et al. 2022. The Chinese pine genome and methylome unveil key features of conifer evolution. Cell 185:204−217.E14

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.12.006

Cazzolla Gatti R, Reich PB, Gamarra JGP, Crowther T, Hui C, et al. 2022. The number of tree species on Earth. PNAS 119:.e2115329119

doi: 10.1073/pnas.2115329119

Chen H, Zeng Y, Yang Y, Huang L, Tang B, et al. 2020. Allele-aware chromosome-level genome assembly and efficient transgene-free genome editing for the autotetraploid cultivated alfalfa. Nature Communications 11:2494

doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16338-x

Koren S, Rhie A, Walenz BP, Dilthey AT, Bickhart DM, et al. 2018. De novo assembly of haplotype-resolved genomes with trio binning. Nature Biotechnology 36:1174−82

doi: 10.1038/nbt.4277

Zhang X, Zhang S, Zhao Q, Ming R, Tang H. 2019. Assembly of allele-aware, chromosomal-scale autopolyploid genomes based on Hi-C data. Nature Plants 5:833−45

doi: 10.1038/s41477-019-0487-8

Kronenberg ZN, Rhie A, Koren S, Concepcion GT, Peluso P, et al. 2021. Extended haplotype-phasing of long-read de novo genome assemblies using Hi-C. Nature Communications 12:1935

doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20536-y

Zhang Q, Qi Y, Pan H, Tang H, Wang G, et al. 2022. Genomic insights into the recent chromosome reduction of autopolyploid sugarcane Saccharum spontaneum. Nature Genetics 54:885−96

doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01084-1

Sun H, Jiao W, Krause K, Campoy JA, Goel M, et al. 2022. Chromosome-scale and haplotype-resolved genome assembly of a tetraploid potato cultivar. Nature Genetics 54:342−48

doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01015-0

Zhang S, Li R, Zhang L, Chen S, Xie M, et al. 2020. New insights into Arabidopsis transcriptome complexity revealed by direct sequencing of native RNAs. Nucleic Acids Research 48:7700−11

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa588

Ji X, Li P, Fuscoe JC, Chen G, Xiao W, et al. 2020. A comprehensive rat transcriptome built from large scale RNA-seq-based annotation. Nucleic Acids Research 48:8320−31

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa638

Liu H, Wang X, Wang G, Cui P, Wu S, et al. 2021. The nearly complete genome of Ginkgo biloba illuminates gymnosperm evolution. Nature Plant 7:748−56

doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-00933-x

Cooke JEK, Eriksson ME, Junttila O. 2012. The dynamic nature of bud dormancy in trees: environmental control and molecular mechanisms. Plant, Cell & Environment 35:1707−28

doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02552.x

Triozzi PM, Ramos-Sánchez JM, Hernández-Verdeja T, Moreno-Cortés A, Allona I, et al. 2018. Photoperiodic regulation of shoot apical growth in poplar. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:1030

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01030

Lloret A, Badenes ML, Ríos G. 2018. Modulation of dormancy and growth responses in reproductive buds of temperate trees. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:1368

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01368

Brunner AM, Evans LM, Hsu CY, Sheng X. 2014. Vernalization and the chilling requirement to exit bud dormancy: shared or separate regulation. Frontiers in Plant Science 5:732

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00732

Liu J, Sherif SM. 2019. Hormonal orchestration of bud dormancy cycle in deciduous woody perennials. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:1136

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01136

Yang Q, Gao Y, Wu X, Moriguchi T, Bai S, et al. 2021. Bud endodormancy in deciduous fruit trees: advances and prospects. Horticulture Research 8:139

doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00575-2

Maurya JP, Bhalerao RP. 2017. Photoperiod- and temperature-mediated control of growth cessation and dormancy in trees: a molecular perspective. Annals of Botany 120:351−60

doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx061

Maurya JP, Triozzi PM, Bhalerao RP, Perales M. 2018. Environmentally sensitive molecular switches drive poplar phenology. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:1873

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01873

Rohde A, Bhalerao RP. 2007. Plant dormancy in the perennial context. Trends in Plant Science 12:217−23

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.03.012

Andersson A, Keskitalo J, Sjodin A, Bhalerao R, Sterky F, et al. 2004. A transcriptional timetable of autumn senescence. Genome Biology 5:R24


Myburg AA, Grattapaglia D, Tuskan GA, Hellsten U, Hayes RD, et al. 2014. The genome of Eucalyptus grandis. Nature 510:356−62

doi: 10.1038/nature13308

Chen S, Wang Y, Yu L, Zheng T, Wang S, et al. 2021. Genome sequence and evolution of Betula platyphylla. Horticulture Research 8:37

doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00481-7

Plomion C, Aury JM, Amselem J, Leroy T, Murat F, et al. 2018. Oak genome reveals facets of long lifespan. Nature Plants 4:440−52

doi: 10.1038/s41477-018-0172-3

Sollars ESA, Harper AL, Kelly LJ, Sambles CM, Ramirez-Gonzalez RH, et al. 2017. Genome sequence and genetic diversity of European ash trees. Nature 541:212−6

doi: 10.1038/nature20786

Nystedt B, Street NR, Wetterbom A, Zuccolo A, Lin YC, et al. 2013. The Norway spruce genome sequence and conifer genome evolution. Nature 497:579−84

doi: 10.1038/nature12211

Rohde A, Storme V, Jorge V, Gaudet M, Vitacolonna N, et al. 2011. Bud set in poplar - genetic dissection of a complex trait in natural and hybrid populations. New Phytologist 189:106−21

doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03469.x

Evans LM, Slavov GT, Rodgers-Melnick E, Martin J, Ranjan P, et al. 2014. Population genomics of Populus trichocarpa identifies signatures of selection and adaptive trait associations. Nature Genetics 46:1089−96

doi: 10.1038/ng.3075

Howe GT, Horvath DP, Dharmawardhana P, Priest HD, Mockler TC, et al. 2015. Extensive transcriptome changes during natural onset and release of vegetative bud dormancy in Populus. Frontiers in Plant Science 6:989

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00989

Karlberg A, Englund M, Petterle A, Molnár G, Sjödin A, et al. 2010. Analysis of global changes in gene expression during activity-dormancy cycle in hybrid aspen apex. Plant Biotechnology 27:1−16

doi: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.27.1

Ueno S, Klopp C, Leplé JC, Derory J, Noirot C, et al. 2013. Transcriptional profiling of bud dormancy induction and release in oak by next-generation sequencing. BMC Genomics 14:236

doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-236

Nose M, Kurita M, Tamura M, Matsushita M, Hiraoka Y, et al. 2020. Effects of day length- and temperature-regulated genes on annual transcriptome dynamics in Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don), a gymnosperm indeterminate species. PloS One 15:e0229843

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229843

Wu K, Duan X, Zhu Z, Sang Z, Zhang Y, et al. 2021. Transcriptomic analysis reveals the positive role of abscisic acid in endodormancy maintenance of leaf buds of Magnolia wufengensis. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:742504

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.742504

Ruttink T, Arend M, Morreel K, Storme V, Rombauts S, et al. 2007. A molecular timetable for apical bud formation and dormancy induction in poplar. The Plant Cell 19:2370−90

doi: 10.1105/tpc.107.052811

Lesur I, Le Provost G, Bento P, Da Silva C, Leplé JC, et al. 2015. The oak gene expression atlas: insights into Fagaceae genome evolution and the discovery of genes regulated during bud dormancy release. BMC Genomics 16:112

doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1331-9

Santamaría ME, Rodríguez R, Cañal MJ, Toorop PE. 2011. Transcriptome analysis of chestnut (Castanea sativa) tree buds suggests a putative role for epigenetic control of bud dormancy. Annals of Botany 108:485−98

doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr185

Li W, Kang Y, Zhang Y, Zang Q, Qi L. 2021. Concerted control of the LaRAV1-LaCDKB1;3 module by temperature during dormancy release and reactivation of larch. Tree Physiology 41:1918−37

doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpab052

Hsu CY, Adams JP, No K, Liang H, Meilan R, et al. 2012. Overexpression of CONSTANS homologs CO1 and CO2 fails to alter normal reproductive onset and fall bud set in woody perennial poplar. PloS One 7:e45448-e

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045448

Yordanov YS, Ma C, Strauss SH, Busov VB. 2014. EARLY BUD-BREAK 1 (EBB1) is a regulator of release from seasonal dormancy in poplar trees. PNAS 111:10001−6

doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405621111

Singh RK, Maurya JP, Azeez A, Miskolczi P, Tylewicz S, et al. 2018. A genetic network mediating the control of bud break in hybrid aspen. Nature Communications 9:4173

doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06696-y

Singh RK, Miskolczi P, Maurya JP, Bhalerao RP. 2019. A Tree ortholog of SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE floral repressor mediates photoperiodic control of bud dormancy. Current Biology 29:128−33

doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.006

Conde D, Le Gac AL, Perales M, Dervinis C, Kirst M, et al. 2017. Chilling-responsive DEMETER-LIKE DNA demethylase mediates in poplar bud break. Plant, Cell & Environment 40:2236−49

doi: 10.1111/pce.13019

Azeez A, Zhao YC, Singh RK, Yordanov YS, Dash M, et al. 2021. EARLY BUD-BREAK 1 and EARLY BUD-BREAK 3 control resumption of poplar growth after winter dormancy. Nature Communications 12:1123

doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21449-0

Anh Tuan P, Bai S, Saito T, Imai T, Ito A, et al. 2016. Involvement of EARLY BUD-BREAK, an AP2/ERF transcription factor gene, in bud break in Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai) lateral flower buds: expression, histone modifications and possible target genes. Plant Cell Physiology 57:1038−47

doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcw041

Csorba T, Questa JI, Sun Q, Dean C. 2014. Antisense COOLAIR mediates the coordinated switching of chromatin states at FLC during vernalization. PNAS 111:16160−5

doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419030111

Johnsen Ø, Fossdal CG, Nagy N, Mølmann JA, Dæhlen OG, et al. 2005. Climatic adaptation in Picea abies progenies is affected by the temperature during zygotic embryogenesis and seed maturation. Plant, Cell & Environment 28:1090−102

doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2005.01356.x

Yakovlev I, Fossdal CG, Skrøppa T, Olsen JE, Jahren AH, Johnsen Ø. 2012. An adaptive epigenetic memory in conifers with important implications for seed production. Seed Science Research 22:63−76

doi: 10.1017/S0960258511000535

Yakovlev IA, Fossdal CG, Johnsen Ø. 2010. MicroRNAs, the epigenetic memory and climatic adaptation in Norway spruce. New Phytologist 187:1154−69

doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03341.x

Yakovlev IA, Fossdal CG, Johnsen Ø, Junttila O, Skrøppa T. 2006. Analysis of gene expression during bud burst initiation in Norway spruce via ESTs from subtracted cDNA libraries. Tree Genetics & Genomes 2:39−52

doi: 10.1007/s11295-005-0031-z

Du Q, Lu W, Quan M, Xiao L, Song F, et al. 2018. Genome-wide association studies to improve wood properties: challenges and prospects. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:1912

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01912

Resende RT, Resende MDV, Silva FF, Azevedo CF, Takahashi EK, et al. 2017. Regional heritability mapping and genome-wide association identify loci for complex growth, wood and disease resistance traits in Eucalyptus. New Phtologist 213:1287−300

doi: 10.1111/nph.14266

Lv C, Lu W, Quan M, Xiao L, Li L, et al. 2021. Pyramiding superior haplotypes and epistatic alleles to accelerate wood quality and yield improvement in poplar breeding. Industrial Crops and Products 171:113891

doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113891

Bartholomé J, Mandrou E, Mabiala A, Jenkins J, Nabihoudine I, et al. 2015. High-resolution genetic maps of Eucalyptus improve Eucalyptus grandis genome assembly. New Phtologist 206:1283−96

doi: 10.1111/nph.13150

Wu Y, Close TJ, Lonardi S. 2011. Accurate construction of consensus genetic maps via integer linear programming. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics 8:381−94

doi: 10.1109/TCBB.2010.35

Rastas P. 2017. Lep-MAP3: robust linkage mapping even for low-coverage whole genome sequencing data. Bioinformatics 33:3726−32

doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx494

Qian Z, Zhang B, Chen H, Lu L, Duan M, et al. 2021. Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling the development of prickles in eggplant by genome re-sequencing analysis. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:731079

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.731079

Li Z, Xu Y. 2022. Bulk segregation analysis in the NGS era: a review of its teenage years. The Plant Journal 109:1355−74

doi: 10.1111/tpj.15646

Zhuo X, Zheng T, Li S, Zhang Z, Zhang M, et al. 2021. Identification of the PmWEEP locus controlling weeping traits in Prunus mume through an integrated genome-wide association study and quantitative trait locus mapping. Horticulture Research 8:131

doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00573-4

Gattolin S, Cirilli M, Pacheco I, Ciacciulli A, Da Silva Linge C, et al. 2018. Deletion of the miR172 target site in a TOE-type gene is a strong candidate variant for dominant double-flower trait in Rosaceae. The Plant Journal 96:358−71

doi: 10.1111/tpj.14036

An Z, Zhao Y, Zhang X, Huang X, Hu Y, et al. 2019. A high-density genetic map and QTL mapping on growth and latex yield-related traits in Hevea brasiliensis Müll. Arg. Industrial Crops and Products 132:440−48

doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2019.03.002

Du Q, Gong C, Wang Q, Zhou D, Yang H, et al. 2016. Genetic architecture of growth traits in Populus revealed by integrated quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis and association studies. New Phtologist 209:1067−82

doi: 10.1111/nph.13695

Du Q, Yang X, Xie J, Quan M, Xiao L, et al. 2019. Time-specific and pleiotropic quantitative trait loci coordinately modulate stem growth in Populus. Plant Biotechnology Journal 17:608−24

doi: 10.1111/pbi.13002

Porth I, Klapste J, Skyba O, Hannemann J, McKown AD, et al. 2013. Genome-wide association mapping for wood characteristics in Populus identifies an array of candidate single nucleotide polymorphisms. New Phytologist 200:710−26

doi: 10.1111/nph.12422

Fahrenkrog AM, Neves LG, Resende MFR Jr, Vazquez AI, de Los Campos G, et al. 2017. Genome-wide association study reveals putative regulators of bioenergy traits in Populus deltoides. New Phtologist 213:799−811

doi: 10.1111/nph.14154

Quan M, Liu X, Du Q, Xiao L, Lu W, et al. 2021. Genome-wide association studies reveal the coordinated regulatory networks underlying photosynthesis and wood formation in Populus. Journal of Experimental Botany 72:5372−89

doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab122

Müller BSF, de Almeida Filho JE, Lima BM, Garcia CC, Missiaggia A, et al. 2019. Independent and Joint-GWAS for growth traits in Eucalyptus by assembling genome-wide data for 3373 individuals across four breeding populations. New Phtologist 221:818−33

doi: 10.1111/nph.15449

De La Torre AR, Puiu D, Crepeau MW, Stevens K, Salzberg SL, et al. 2019. Genomic architecture of complex traits in loblolly pine. New Phtologist 221:1789−801

doi: 10.1111/nph.15535

Chen M, Fan W, Ji F, Hua H, Liu J, et al. 2021. Genome-wide identification of agronomically important genes in outcrossing crops using OutcrossSeq. Molecular Plant 14:556−70

doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2021.01.003

Gong C, Du Q, Xie J, Quan M, Chen B, et al. 2018. Dissection of insertion-deletion variants within differentially expressed genes involved in wood formation in Populus. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:2199

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.02199

Valenzuela CE, Ballesta P, Ahmar S, Fiaz S, Heidari P, et al. 2021. Haplotype- and SNP-based GWAS for growth and wood quality traits in Eucalyptus cladocalyx trees under arid conditions. Plants 10:148

doi: 10.3390/plants10010148

Ding X, Diao S, Luan Q, Wu HX, Zhang Y, et al. 2022. A transcriptome-based association study of growth, wood quality, and oleoresin traits in a slash pine breeding population. PloS Genetics 18:e1010017

doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010017

Francisco FR, Aono AH, da Silva CC, Gonçalves PS, Scaloppi Junior EJ, et al. 2021. Unravelling Rubber Tree Growth by Integrating GWAS and Biological Network-Based Approaches. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:768589

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.768589

Sarić R, Nguyen VD, Burge T, Berkowitz O, Trtílek M, et al. 2022. Applications of hyperspectral imaging in plant phenotyping. Trends in Plant Science 27:301−15

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.12.003

Sawitri, Tani N, Na’iem M, Widiyatno, Indrioko S, et al. 2020. Potential of genome-wide association studies and genomic selection to improve productivity and quality of commercial timber species in tropical rainforest, a case study of Shorea platyclados. Forests 11:239

doi: 10.3390/f11020239

Chhatre VE, Fetter KC, Gougherty AV, Fitzpatrick MC, Soolanayakanahally RY, et al. 2019. Climatic niche predicts the landscape structure of locally adaptive standing genetic variation. bioRxiv Preprint

doi: 10.1101/817411

Guzella TS, Dey S, Chelo IM, Pino-Querido A, Pereira VF, et al. 2018. Slower environmental change hinders adaptation from standing genetic variation. PLoS Genetics 14:e1007731

doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007731

Filipe JC, Rymer PD, Byrne M, Hardy G, Mazanec R, et al. 2022. Signatures of natural selection in a foundation tree along Mediterranean climatic gradients. Molecular Ecology 31:1735−52

doi: 10.1111/mec.16351

Wang J, Ding J, Tan B, Robinson KM, Michelson IH, et al. 2018. A major locus controls local adaptation and adaptive life history variation in a perennial plant. Genome Biology 19:72

doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1444-y

Gugger PF, Fitz-Gibbon ST, Albarrán-Lara A, Wright JW, Sork VL. 2021. Landscape genomics of Quercus lobata reveals genes involved in local climate adaptation at multiple spatial scales. Molecular Ecology 30:406−23

doi: 10.1111/mec.15731

Lu W, Xiao L, Quan M, Wang Q, El-Kassaby YA, et al. 2020. Linkage-linkage disequilibrium dissection of the epigenetic quantitative trait loci (epiQTLs) underlying growth and wood properties in Populus. New Phtologist 225:1218−33

doi: 10.1111/nph.16220

Ci D, Song Y, Du Q, Tian M, Han S, Zhang D. 2016. Variation in genomic methylation in natural populations of Populus simonii is associated with leaf shape and photosynthetic traits. Journal of Experimental Botany 67:723−37

doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv485

Ma K, Sun L, Cheng T, Pan H, Wang J, Zhang Q. 2018. Epigenetic Variance, Performing Cooperative Structure with Genetics, Is Associated with Leaf Shape Traits in Widely Distributed Populations of Ornamental Tree Prunus mume. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:41

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00041

Ong-Abdullah M, Ordway JM, Jiang N, Ooi SE, Kok SY, et al. 2015. Loss of Karma transposon methylation underlies the mantled somaclonal variant of oil palm. Nature 525:533−7

doi: 10.1038/nature15365

Sáez-Laguna E, Guevara MÁ, Díaz LM, Sánchez-Gómez D, Collada C, et al. 2014. Epigenetic variability in the genetically uniform forest tree species Pinus pinea L. PLoS One 9:e103145

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103145

Gugger PF, Fitz-Gibbon S, PellEgrini M, Sork VL. 2016. Species-wide patterns of DNA methylation variation in Quercus lobata and their association with climate gradients. Molecular Ecology 25:1665−80

doi: 10.1111/mec.13563

Xu G, Lyu J, Li Q, Liu H, Wang D, et al. 2020. Evolutionary and functional genomics of DNA methylation in maize domestication and improvement. Nature Communications 11:5539

doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19333-4

Xu J, Chen G, Hermanson PJ, Xu Q, Sun C, et al. 2019. Population-level analysis reveals the widespread occurrence and phenotypic consequence of DNA methylation variation not tagged by genetic variation in maize. Genome Biology 20:243

doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1859-0

Eichten SR, Briskine R, Song J, Li Q, Swanson-Wagner R, et al. 2013. Epigenetic and genetic influences on DNA methylation variation in maize populations. The Plant Cell 25:2783−97

doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.114793

Motte H, Vercauteren A, Depuydt S, Landschoot S, Geelen D, et al. 2014. Combining linkage and association mapping identifies RECEPTOR-LIKE PROTEIN KINASE1 as an essential Arabidopsis shoot regeneration gene. PNAS 111:8305−10

doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404978111

Willi Y, Kristensen TN, Sgrò CM, Weeks AR, Ørsted M, et al. 2022. Conservation genetics as a management tool: The five best-supported paradigms to assist the management of threatened species. PNAS 119:e2105076119

doi: 10.1073/pnas.2105076119

Wright S. 1943. Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:114−38

doi: 10.1093/genetics/28.2.114

Zhao W, Sun YQ, Pan J, Sullivan AR, Arnold ML, et al. 2020. Effects of landscapes and range expansion on population structure and local adaptation. New Phytologist 228:330−43

doi: 10.1111/nph.16619

Excoffier L, Foll M, Petit RJ. 2009. Genetic consequences of range expansions. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 40:481−501

doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173414

Orsini L, Vanoverbeke J, Swillen I, Mergeay J, De Meester L. 2013. Drivers of population genetic differentiation in the wild: isolation by dispersal limitation, isolation by adaptation and isolation by colonization. Molecular Ecology 22:5983−99

doi: 10.1111/mec.12561

Wang IJ, Bradburd GS. 2014. Isolation by environment. Molecular Ecology 23:5649−62

doi: 10.1111/mec.12938

Xia H, Wang B, Zhao W, Pan J, Mao J, et al. 2018. Combining mitochondrial and nuclear genome analyses to dissect the effects of colonization, environment, and geography on population structure in Pinus tabuliformis. Evolutionary Applications 11:1931−45

doi: 10.1111/eva.12697

Nadeau S, Meirmans PG, Aitken SN, Ritland K, Isabel N. 2016. The challenge of separating signatures of local adaptation from those of isolation by distance and colonization history: The case of two white pines. Ecology and Evolution 6:8649−64

doi: 10.1002/ece3.2550

Yeaman S, Hodgins KA, Lotterhos KE, Suren H, Nadeau S, et al. 2016. Convergent local adaptation to climate in distantly related conifers. Science 353:1431−33

doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7812

Chen J, Li L, Milesi P, Jansson G, Berlin M, et al. 2019. Genomic data provide new insights on the demographic history and the extent of recent material transfers in Norway spruce. Evolutionary Applications 12:1539−51

doi: 10.1111/eva.12801

Eckert AJ, Wegrzyn JL, Liechty JD, Lee JM, Cumbie WP, et al. 2013. The evolutionary genetics of the genes underlying phenotypic associations for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda, Pinaceae). Genetics 195:1353−72

doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.157198

Grivet D, Avia K, Vaattovaara A, Eckert AJ, Neale DB, et al. 2017. High rate of adaptive evolution in two widespread European pines. Molecular Ecology 26:6857−70

doi: 10.1111/mec.14402

Hall D, Olsson J, Zhao W, Kroon J, Wennström U, et al. 2021. Divergent pattern between phenotypic and genetic variation in Scots pine. Plant Communications 2:100139

doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2020.100139

Rellstab C, Zoller S, Walthert L, Lesur I, Pluess AR, et al. 2016. Signatures of local adaptation in candidate genes of oaks (Quercus spp. ) with respect to present and future climatic conditions. Molecular Ecology 25:5907−24

doi: 10.1111/mec.13889

Jia KH, Zhao W, Maier PA, Hu XG, Jin YQ, et al. 2020. Landscape genomics predicts climate change-related genetic offset for the widespread Platycladus orientalis (Cupressaceae). Evolutionary Applications 13:665−76

doi: 10.1111/eva.12891

Guo J, Wang B, Liu Z, Mao J, Wang X, et al. 2022. Low genetic diversity and population connectivity fuelvulnerability to climate change for the Tertiary relict pinePinus bungeana. Journal of Systematics and Evolution 00:1−14

doi: 10.1111/jse.12821

Hoban S, Kelley JL, Lotterhos KE, Antolin MF, Bradburd G, et al. 2016. Finding the genomic basis of local adaptation: pitfalls, practical solutions, and future directions. The American Naturalist 188:379−97

doi: 10.1086/688018

Barton N, Hermisson J, Nordborg M. 2019. Population Genetics: Why structure matters. eLife 8:e45380

doi: 10.7554/eLife.45380

Gienapp P. 2020. Is gene mapping in wild populations useful for understanding and predicting adaptation to global change. Global Change Biolology 26:2737−49

doi: 10.1111/gcb.15058

Fitzpatrick MC, Keller SR. 2015. Ecological genomics meets community-level modelling of biodiversity: mapping the genomic landscape of current and future environmental adaptation. Ecology Letters 18:1−16

doi: 10.1111/ele.12376

Bay RA, Harrigan RJ, Underwood VL, Gibbs HL, Smith TB, Ruegg K. 2018. Genomic signals of selection predict climate-driven population declines in a migratory bird. Science 359:83−6

doi: 10.1126/science.aan4380

Gougherty AV, Keller SR, Fitzpatrick MC. 2021. Maladaptation, migration and extirpation fuel climate change risk in a forest tree species. Nature Climate Change 11:166−71

doi: 10.1038/s41558-020-00968-6

Láruson ÁJ, Fitzpatrick MC, Keller SR, Haller BC, Lotterhos KE. 2022. Seeing the Forest for the trees: Assessing genetic offset predictions from Gradient Forest. Evolutionary Applications 15:403−16

doi: 10.1111/eva.13354

Aitken SN, Whitlock MC. 2013. Assisted gene flow to facilitate local adaptation to climate change. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 44:367−88

doi: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135747

Ruotsalainen S. 2014. Increased forest production through forest tree breeding. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 29:49


Butler BJ, Wear DN. 2013. Forest Ownership Dynamics of Southern Forests. In The Southern Forest Futures Project: Technical Report, eds. Wear DN, Greispp JG. USA: USDA Forest Service, Southern Research Station. pp.103−22


Meuwissen T, Hayes B, Goddard M. 2016. Genomic selection: A paradigm shift in animal breeding. Animal Frontiers 6:6−14

doi: 10.2527/af.2016-0002

Isik F. 2014. Genomic selection in forest tree breeding: the concept and an outlook to the future. New Forests 45:379−401

doi: 10.1007/s11056-014-9422-z

Caballero M, Lauer E, Bennett J, Zaman S, McEvoy S, et al. 2021. Toward genomic selection in Pinus taeda: Integrating resources to support array design in a complex conifer genome. Applications in Plant Sciences 2021:e11439

doi: 10.1002/aps3.11439

Jackson C, Christie N, Reynolds SM, Marais GC, Tii-Kuzu Y, et al. 2022. A genome-wide SNP genotyping resource for tropical pine tree species. Molecular Ecology Resources 22:695−710

doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13484

Graham N, Telfer E, Frickey T, Slavov G, Ismael A, et al. 2022. Development and validation of a 36K SNP array for radiata pine (Pinus Radiata D. Don). Forests 13:176

doi: 10.3390/f13020176

Silva-Junior OB, Faria DA, Grattapaglia D. 2015. A flexible multi-species genome-wide 60K SNP chip developed from pooled resequencing of 240 Eucalyptus tree genomes across 12 species. New Phtologist 206:1527−40

doi: 10.1111/nph.13322

Grattapaglia D, Silva-Junior OB, Resende RT, Cappa EP, Müller BSF, et al. 2018. Quantitative genetics and genomics converge to accelerate forest tree breeding. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:1693

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01693

Lebedev VG, Lebedeva TN, Chernodubov AI, Shestibratov K. 2020. Genomic selection for forest tree improvement: methods, achievements and perspectives. Forests 11:1190

doi: 10.3390/f11111190

Mphahlele MM, Isik F, Mostert-O’Neill MM, Reynolds SM, Hodge GR, et al. 2020. Expected benefits of genomic selection for growth and wood quality traits in Eucalyptus grandis. Tree Genetics & Genomes 16:49

doi: 10.1007/s11295-020-01443-1

Chamberland V, Robichaud F, Perron M, Gélinas N, Bousquet J, et al. 2020. Conventional versus genomic selection for white spruce improvement: a comparison of costs and benefits of plantations on Quebec public lands. Tree Genetics & Genomes 16:17

doi: 10.1007/s11295-019-1409-7

Telfer E, Graham N, Macdonald L, Li Y, Klápště J, et al. 2019. A high-density exome capture genotype-by-sequencing panel for forestry breeding in Pinus radiata. PLoS One 14:e0222640

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222640

Wegrzyn JL, Liechty JD, Stevens KA, Wu LS, Loopstra CA, et al. 2014. Unique features of the loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) megagenome revealed through sequence annotation. Genetics 196:891−909

doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.159996

Li X, Gunasekara C, Guo Y, Zhang H, Lei L, et al. 2014. Pop's Pipes: poplar gene expression data analysis pipelines. Tree Genetics & Genomes 10:1093−101

doi: 10.1007/s11295-014-0745-x

Chen T, He HL, Church GM. 1999. Modeling gene expression with differential equations. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 1999:29−40

doi: 10.1007/s11295-019-1409-7

Ruklisa D, Brazma A, Viksna J. 2005. Reconstruction of gene regulatory networks under the finite state linear model. Genome Information 16:225−36

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222640

Dojer N, Gambin A, Mizera A, Wilczyński B, Tiuryn J. 2006. Applying dynamic Bayesian networks to perturbed gene expression data. BMC Bioinformatics 7:249

doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-249

Louis M, Becskei A. 2002. Binary and graded responses in gene networks. Science's STKE 43:PE33

doi: 10.1126/stke.2002.143.pe33

Kauffman S. 1969. Homeostasis and differentiation in random genetic control networks. Nature 224:177−78

doi: 10.1038/224177a0

Chen BS, Chang CH, Wang YC, Wu CH, Lee HC. 2011. Robust model matching design methodology for a stochastic synthetic gene network. Mathematical Biosciences 230:23−36

doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2010.12.007

Schäfer J, Strimmer K. 2005. An empirical Bayes approach to inferring large-scale gene association networks. Bioinformatics 21:754−64

doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti062

Butte AJ, Kohane IS. 2000. Mutual information relevance networks: Functional genomic clustering using pairwise entropy measurements. Proceedings of Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 5:418−29

doi: 10.1142/9789814447331_0040

Margolin AA, Nemenman I, Basso K, Wiggins C, Stolovitzky G, et al. 2006. ARACNE: an algorithm for the reconstruction of gene regulatory networks in a mammalian cellular context. BMC Bioinformatics 7:S7

doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-7-S1-S7

Faith JJ, Hayete B, Thaden JT, Mogno I, Wierzbowski J, et al. 2007. Large-scale mapping and validation of Escherichia coli transcriptional regulation from a compendium of expression profiles. PLoS Biology 5:e0050008

doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050008

Altay G, Emmert-Streib F. 2010. Inferring the conservative causal core of gene regulatory networks. BMC Systems Biology 4:132

doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-4-132

Luo W, Hankenson KD, Woolf PJ. 2008. Learning transcriptional regulatory networks from high throughput gene expression data using continuous three-way mutual information. BMC Bioinformatics 9:467

doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-9-467

Lin YC, Li W, Sun YH, Kumari S, Wei H, et al. 2013. SND1 transcription factor-directed quantitative functional hierarchical genetic regulatory network in wood formation in Populus trichocarpa. The Plant Cell 25:4324−41

doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.117697

Wei M, Liu Q, Wang Z, Yang J, Li W, et al. 2020. PuHox52-mediated hierarchical multilayered gene regulatory network promotes adventitious root formation in Populus ussuriensis. New Phytologist 228:1369−85

doi: 10.1111/nph.16778

Wu W, Li J, Wang Q, Lv K, Du K, et al. 2021. Growth-regulating factor 5 (GRF5)-mediated gene regulatory network promotes leaf growth and expansion in poplar. New Phytologist 230:612−28

doi: 10.1111/nph.17179

Lu S, Li Q, Wei H, Chang MJ, Tunlaya-Anukit S, et al. 2013. Ptr-miR397a is a negative regulator of laccase genes affecting lignin content in Populus trichocarpa. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences The United States of America 110:10848−53

doi: 10.1073/pnas.1308936110

Lv K, Wu W, Wei H, Liu G. 2021. A systems biology approach identifies a regulator, BplERF1, of cold tolerance in Betula platyphylla. Forestry Research 1:11

doi: 10.48130/FR-2021-0011

Kumari S, Deng W, Gunasekara C, Chiang V, Chen HS, et al. 2016. Bottom-up GGM algorithm for constructing multilayered hierarchical gene regulatory networks that govern biological pathways or processes. BMC Bioinformatics 17:132

doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-0981-1

Deng W, Zhang K, Busov V, Wei H. 2017. Recursive random forest algorithm for constructing multilayered hierarchical gene regulatory networks that govern biological pathways. PloS ONE 12:e0171532

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171532

Wei H. 2019. Construction of a hierarchical gene regulatory network centered around a transcription factor. Briefings in Bioinformatics 20:1021−31

doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx152

Nie J, Stewart R, Zhang H, Thomson JA, Ruan F, et al. 2011. TF-Cluster: a pipeline for identifying functionally coordinated transcription factors via network decomposition of the shared coexpression connectivity matrix (SCCM). BMC Systems Biology 5:53

doi: 10.1186/1752-0509-5-53

Ji X, Chen S, Li J, Deng W, Wei Z, et al. 2017. SSGA and MSGA: two seed-growing algorithms for constructing collaborative subnetworks. Scientific Reports 7:1446

doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01556-z

Deng W. 2018. Algorithms for reconstruction of gene regulatory networks from high -throughput gene expression data. Thesis. Michigan Technological University, USA. 101 pp.