doi:10.48130/forres-0025-0010

[1]

Aponte C, Kasel S, Nitschke CR, Tanase MA, Vickers H, et al. 2020. Structural diversity underpins carbon storage in Australian temperate forests. Global Ecology and Biogeography 29:789−802

doi: 10.1111/geb.13038

[2]

Ali A. 2019. Forest stand structure and functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Ecological Indicators 98:665−77

doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.11.017

[3]

LaRue EA, Knott JA, Domke GM, Chen HY, Guo Q, et al. 2023. Structural diversity as a reliable and novel predictor for ecosystem productivity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 21:33−39

doi: 10.1002/fee.2586

[4]

Lian Z, Wang J, Fan C, von Gadow K. 2022. Structure complexity is the primary driver of functional diversity in the temperate forests of northeastern China. Forest Ecosystems 9:100048

doi: 10.1016/j.fecs.2022.100048

[5]

Yang B, Ma R, Zhai J, Du J, Bai J, et al. 2024. Stand spatial structure is more important than species diversity in enhancing the carbon sink of fragile natural secondary forest. Ecological Indicators 158:111449

doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.111449

[6]

Tetemke BA, Birhane E, Rannestad MM, Eid T. 2021. Species diversity and stand structural diversity of woody plants predominantly determine aboveground carbon stock of a dry Afromontane forest in Northern Ethiopia. Forest Ecology and Management 500:119634

doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119634

[7]

Kaushal S, Baishya R. 2021. Stand structure and species diversity regulate biomass carbon stock under major Central Himalayan forest types of India. Ecological Processes 10:14

doi: 10.1186/s13717-021-00283-8

[8]

Wang Y, Liu Z, Tang T, Li J. 2023. Analysis of the relative importance of stand structure and site conditions for the productivity, species diversity, and carbon sequestration of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Phoebe bournei mixed forest. Plants 12:1633

doi: 10.3390/plants12081633

[9]

Noulèkoun F, Mensah S, Kim H, Jo H, Gouwakinnou GN, et al. 2023. Tree size diversity is the major driver of aboveground carbon storage in dryland agroforestry parklands. Scientific Reports 13:22210

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-49119-9

[10]

Kint V, Van Meirvenne M, Nachtergale L, Geudens G, Lust N. 2003. Spatial methods for quantifying forest stand structure development: a comparison between nearest-neighbor indices and variogram analysis. Forest Science 49:36−49

doi: 10.1093/forestscience/49.1.36

[11]

Hui G, Zhang G, Zhao Z, Yang A. 2019. Methods of forest structure research: a review. Current Forestry Reports 5:142−54

doi: 10.1007/s40725-019-00090-7

[12]

Zeller L, Pretzsch H. 2019. Effect of forest structure on stand productivity in Central European forests depends on developmental stage and tree species diversity. Forest Ecology and Management 434:193−204

doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.12.024

[13]

Xu Y, Chen HYH, Qiao X, Zhang Y, Jiang M. 2024. The control of external and internal canopy structural heterogeneity on diversity and productivity relationship in a subtropical forest. Forest Ecosystems 11:100246

doi: 10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100246

[14]

Ayushi K, Babu KN, Ayyappan N. 2023. Structural diversity is a key driver of above-ground biomass in tropical forests. Plant Ecology & Diversity 16:147−64

doi: 10.1080/17550874.2023.2277282

[15]

Li F, Shi Z, Liu S, Chen M, Xu G, et al. 2024. Stand structural diversity and edaphic properties regulate aboveground biomass of Abies fargesii var. faxoniana primary forest on the eastern Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. European Journal of Forest Research 143:1401−10

doi: 10.1007/s10342-024-01697-7

[16]

Zhang K, Gao D, Guo H, Zeng J, Liu X. 2022. Forest structure characteristics on soil carbon and nitrogen storage of Pinus massoniana plantations in southern subtropic region. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 5:1022221

doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2022.1022221

[17]

Baul TK, Chakraborty A, Nandi R, Mohiuddin M, Kilpeläinen A, et al. 2021. Effects of tree species diversity and stand structure on carbon stocks of homestead forests in Maheshkhali Island, Southern Bangladesh. Carbon Balance and Management 16:11

doi: 10.1186/s13021-021-00175-6

[18]

Bricca A, Bonari G, Padullés Cubino J, Cutini M. 2023. Effect of forest structure and management on the functional diversity and composition of understorey plant communities. Applied Vegetation Science 26:e12710

doi: 10.1111/avsc.12710

[19]

Hinko-Najera N, Isaac P, Beringer J, van Gorsel E, Ewenz C, et al. 2017. Net ecosystem carbon exchange of a dry temperate eucalypt forest. Biogeosciences 14:3781−800

doi: 10.5194/bg-14-3781-2017

[20]

Chaves JE, Aravena Acuña MC, Rodríguez-Souilla J, Cellini JM, Rappa NJ, et al. 2023. Carbon pool dynamics after variable retention harvesting in Nothofagus pumilio forests of Tierra del Fuego. Ecological Processes 12:5

doi: 10.1186/s13717-023-00418-z

[21]

Di Matteo G, Luzzi G, Basile A, Sposato A, Bertini G, et al. 2023. Carbon concentrations and carbon storage capacity of three old-growth forests in the Sila National Park, Southern Italy. Journal of Forestry Research 34:233−42

doi: 10.1007/s11676-022-01549-3

[22]

Ali A, Poudel TR, Ismail MJ, Saha S, Dong L. 2025. Associations between stand spatial structures and carbon sequestration on natural Larix gmelinii forests in Northeast China. Trees, Forests and People 20:100837

doi: 10.1016/j.tfp.2025.100837

[23]

Hilmers T, Mehtätalo L, Bielak K, Brazaitis G, del Río M, et al. 2025. Towards resource-efficient forests: Mixing species changes crown biomass allocation and improves growth efficiency. Plants, People, Planet 7:117−32

doi: 10.1002/ppp3.10562

[24]

Marqués L, Camarero JJ, Zavala MA, Stoffel M, Ballesteros-Cánovas JA, et al. 2021. Evaluating tree-to-tree competition during stand development in a relict Scots pine forest: how much does climate matter. Trees 35:1207−19

doi: 10.1007/s00468-021-02109-8

[25]

Fu L, Lei X, Hu Z, Zeng W, Tang S, et al. 2017. Integrating regional climate change into allometric equations for estimating tree aboveground biomass of Masson pine in China. Annals of Forest Science 74:42

doi: 10.1007/s13595-017-0636-z

[26]

Ouyang S, Xiang W, Wang X, Zeng Y, Lei P, et al. 2016. Significant effects of biodiversity on forest biomass during the succession of subtropical forest in South China. Forest Ecology and Management 372:291−302

doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.04.020

[27]

Li H, Lei Y. 2010. Estimation and evoluation of forest biomass carbon storage in China. Bejing: China Forestry Publishing House

[28]

Wang A, Zha T, Zhang Z. 2023. Variations in soil organic carbon storage and stability with vegetation restoration stages on the Loess Plateau of China. CATENA 228:107142

doi: 10.1016/j.catena.2023.107142

[29]

Cheng F, Peng X, Zhao P, Yuan J, Zhong C, et al. 2013. Soil microbial biomass, basal respiration and enzyme activity of main forest types in the Qinling Mountains. PLoS One 8:e67353

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067353

[30]

Ali A, Yan ER, Chen HYH, Chang SX, Zhao YT, et al. 2016. Stand structural diversity rather than species diversity enhances aboveground carbon storage in secondary subtropical forests in Eastern China. Biogeosciences 13:4627−35

doi: 10.5194/bg-13-4627-2016

[31]

Mensah S, Veldtman R, Assogbadjo AE, Glèlè Kakaï R, Seifert T. 2016. Tree species diversity promotes aboveground carbon storage through functional diversity and functional dominance. Ecology and Evolution 6:7546−57

doi: 10.1002/ece3.2525

[32]

Coverdale TC, Davies AB. 2023. Unravelling the relationship between plant diversity and vegetation structural complexity: a review and theoretical framework. Journal of Ecology 111:1378−95

doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.14068

[33]

Su L, Heydari M, Omidipour R, Soheili F, Cheraghi J, et al. 2023. Stand structural diversity and elevation rather than functional diversity drive aboveground biomass in historically disturbed semiarid oak forests. Forest Ecology and Management 543:121139

doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121139

[34]

Lei X, Wang W, Peng C. 2009. Relationships between stand growth and structural diversity in spruce-dominated forests in New Brunswick, Canada. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 39:1835−47

doi: 10.1139/X09-089

[35]

Zhao S, Zheng XJ, Yin L, Wang Y. 2023. Forest stand factors determine the rainfall pattern of crown allocation of Picea schrenkiana in the northern slope of Mount Bogda, Tianshan Range, China. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:1113354

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1113354

[36]

Zhou X, Hu C, Wang Z. 2023. Distribution of biomass and carbon content in estimation of carbon density for typical forests. Global Ecology and Conservation 48:e02707

doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2023.e02707

[37]

Hui G, Gadow KV, Hu Y, Chen B. 2004. Characterizing forest spatial distribution pattern with the mean value of uniform angle index. Acta Ecological Sinica 24:11225−29

doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0933.2004.06.020

[38]

Zhang J, Liu C, Ge Z, Zhang Z. 2024. Stand spatial structure and productivity based on random structural unit in Larix principis-rupprechtii forests. Ecosphere 15:e4824

doi: 10.1002/ecs2.4824

[39]

Tang G, Zhang H, Xing H, Yuan T, Gontcharov AA, et al. 2024. Light adaptation strategies of Quercus mongolica at different ages in four plantations. Forestry Research 4:e005

doi: 10.48130/forres-0024-0002

[40]

Lange M, Eisenhauer N, Sierra CA, Bessler H, Engels C, et al. 2015. Plant diversity increases soil microbial activity and soil carbon storage. Nature Communications 6:6707

doi: 10.1038/ncomms7707

[41]

Yao Y, Cao S, Gong X, Singh BP, Fang Y, et al. 2022. Intensive management of a bamboo forest significantly enhanced soil nutrient concentrations but decreased soil microbial biomass and enzyme activity: a long-term chronosequence study. Journal of Soils and Sediments 22:2640−53

doi: 10.1007/s11368-022-03253-5

[42]

Xue W, Zhang W, Chen Y. 2023. Heavy thinning temporally reduced soil carbon storage by intensifying soil microbial phosphorus limitation. Plant and Soil 484:33−48

doi: 10.1007/s11104-022-05782-x

[43]

Barbier S, Gosselin F, Balandier P. 2008. Influence of tree species on understory vegetation diversity and mechanisms involved—a critical review for temperate and boreal forests. Forest Ecology and Management 254:1−15

doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.09.038

[44]

Germany MS, Bruelheide H, Erfmeier A. 2017. Limited tree richness effects on herb layer composition, richness and productivity in experimental forest stands. Journal of Plant Ecology 10:190−200

doi: 10.1093/jpe/rtw109

[45]

Ádám R, Ódor P, Bölöni J. 2013. The effects of stand characteristics on the understory vegetation in Quercus petraea and Q. cerris dominated forests. Community Ecology 14:101−09

doi: 10.1556/ComEc.14.2013.1.11

[46]

Dormann CF, Bagnara M, Boch S, Hinderling J, Janeiro-Otero A, et al. 2020. Plant species richness increases with light availability, but not variability, in temperate forests understorey. BMC Ecology 20:43

doi: 10.1186/s12898-020-00311-9

[47]

Lesko JM, Sloan JL, Löf M, Jacobs DF. 2024. Overstory and understory resource competition variably influences conversion of introduced conifer plantations to native hardwoods. Forest Ecology and Management 566:122102

doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2024.122102

[48]

Gao Y, Cheng J, Ma Z, Zhao Y, Su J. 2014. Carbon storage in biomass, litter, and soil of different plantations in a semiarid temperate region of northwest China. Annals of Forest Science 71:427−35

doi: 10.1007/s13595-013-0355-z

[49]

Zhang B, Dong X, Qu H, Gao R, Mao L. 2023. Effects of thinning on ecosystem carbon storage and tree-shrub-herb diversity of a low-quality secondary forest in NE China. Journal of Forestry Research 34:977−91

doi: 10.1007/s11676-022-01531-z

[50]

Su X, Wang M, Huang Z, Fu S, Chen HYH. 2019. Forest understorey vegetation: colonization and the availability and heterogeneity of resources. Forests 10:944

doi: 10.3390/f10110944

[51]

Deng J, Fang S, Fang X, Jin Y, Kuang Y, et al. 2023. Forest understory vegetation study: current status and future trends. Forestry Research 3:6

doi: 10.48130/FR-2023-0006

[52]

Ren S, Ali A, Liu H, Yuan Z, Yang Q, et al. 2021. Response of community diversity and productivity to canopy gap disturbance in subtropical forests. Forest Ecology and Management 502:119740

doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2021.119740

[53]

De Grandpré L, Boucher D, Bergeron Y, Gagnon D. 2011. Effects of small canopy gaps on boreal mixedwood understory vegetation dynamics. Community Ecology 12:67−77

doi: 10.1556/ComEc.12.2011.1.9

[54]

Bloor JMG, Tardif A, Pottier J. 2020. Spatial heterogeneity of vegetation structure, plant N pools and soil N content in relation to grassland management. Agronomy 10:716

doi: 10.3390/agronomy10050716