[1]

Bibri SE. 2020. Compact urbanism and the synergic potential of its integration with data-driven smart urbanism: an extensive interdisciplinary literature review. Land Use Policy 97:104703

doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104703
[2]

Yin M, Bertolini L, Duan J. 2015. The effects of the high-speed railway on urban development: international experience and potential implications for China. Progress in Planning 98:1−52

doi: 10.1016/j.progress.2013.11.001
[3]

Mallqui YYC, Pojani D. 2017. Barriers to successful Bus Rapid Transit expansion: developed cities versus developing megacities. Case Studies on Transport Policy 5:254−66

doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2017.01.004
[4]

Chehri A, Mouftah HT. 2019. Autonomous vehicles in the sustainable cities, the beginning of a green adventure. Sustainable Cities and Society 51:101751

doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2019.101751
[5]

Madigan R, Louw T, Wilbrink M, Schieben A, Merat N. 2017. What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 50:55−64

doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2017.07.007
[6]

Haque AM, Brakewood C. 2020. A synthesis and comparison of American automated shuttle pilot projects. Case Studies on Transport Policy 8:928−37

doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2020.05.005
[7]

Mouratidis K, Cobeña Serrano V. 2021. Autonomous buses: Intentions to use, passenger experiences, and suggestions for improvement. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 76:321−35

doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2020.12.007
[8]

Azad M, Hoseinzadeh N, Brakewood C, Cherry CR, Han LD. 2019. Fully autonomous buses: a literature review and future research directions. Journal of Advanced Transportation 2019:4603548

doi: 10.1155/2019/4603548
[9]

Chen CF. 2019. Factors affecting the decision to use autonomous shuttle services: evidence from a scooter-dominant urban context. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 67:195−204

doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.10.016
[10]

Jing P, Xu G, Chen Y, Shi Y, Zhan F. 2020. The determinants behind the acceptance of autonomous vehicles: a systematic review. Sustainability 12(5):1719

doi: 10.3390/su12051719
[11]

Davis FD. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3):319−40

doi: 10.2307/249008
[12]

Rhodes R, Courneya K. 2003. Modelling the theory of planned behaviour and past behaviour. Psychology, Health & Medicine 8:57−69

doi: 10.1080/1354850021000059269
[13]

Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly 27(3):425−78

doi: 10.2307/30036540
[14]

Rahman MM, Lesch MF, Horrey WJ, Strawderman L. 2017. Assessing the utility of TAM, TPB, and UTAUT for advanced driver assistance systems. Accident Analysis & Prevention 108:361−73

doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.09.011
[15]

Rejali S, Aghabayk K, Esmaeli S, Shiwakoti N. 2023. Comparison of technology acceptance model, theory of planned behavior, and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology to assess a priori acceptance of fully automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 168:103565

doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2022.103565
[16]

Cai L, Yuen KF, Wang X. 2023. Explore public acceptance of autonomous buses: An integrated model of UTAUT, TTF and trust. Travel Behaviour and Society 31:120−30

doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2022.11.010
[17]

Xu Z, Zhang K, Min H, Wang Z, Zhao X, et al. 2018. What drives people to accept automated vehicles? Findings from a field experiment. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 95:320−34

doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.024
[18]

Wu Z, Zhou H, Xi H, Wu N. 2021. Analysing public acceptance of autonomous buses based on an extended TAM model. IET Intelligent Transport Systems 15:1318−30

doi: 10.1049/itr2.12100
[19]

Rahman MM, Deb S, Strawderman L, Burch R, Smith B. 2019. How the older population perceives self-driving vehicles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 65:242−57

doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.08.002
[20]

Lee HR, Jung HY. 2018. An study on factors affecting the acceptance of autonomous vehicle from the extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. Journal of Korea Planning Association 53:73−86

doi: 10.17208/jkpa.2018.10.53.5.73
[21]

Choi JK, Ji YG. 2015. Investigating the importance of trust on adopting an autonomous vehicle. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 31:692−702

doi: 10.1080/10447318.2015.1070549
[22]

Herrenkind B, Brendel AB, Nastjuk I, Greve M, Kolbe LM. 2019. Investigating end-user acceptance of autonomous electric buses to accelerate diffusion. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 74:255−76

doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.08.003
[23]

Zhang T, Tao D, Qu X, Zhang X, Lin R, et al. 2019. The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public's acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 98:207−20

doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.018
[24]

Herrenkind B, Nastjuk I, Brendel AB, Trang S, Kolbe LM. 2019. Young people's travel behavior – Using the life-oriented approach to understand the acceptance of autonomous driving. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 74:214−33

doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2019.07.023
[25]

Hegner SM, Beldad AD, Brunswick GJ. 2019. In automatic we trust: investigating the impact of trust, control, personality characteristics, and extrinsic and intrinsic motivations on the acceptance of autonomous vehicles. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 35:1769−80

doi: 10.1080/10447318.2019.1572353
[26]

Jing P, Huang H, Ran B, Zhan F, Shi Y. 2019. Exploring the factors affecting mode choice intention of autonomous vehicle based on an extended theory of planned behavior—a case study in China. Sustainability 11(4):1155

doi: 10.3390/su11041155
[27]

Zhang T, Tao D, Qu X, Zhang X, Zeng J, et al. 2020. Automated vehicle acceptance in China: Social influence and initial trust are key determinants. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 112:220−33

doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2020.01.027
[28]

Wu J, Liao H, Wang JW, Chen T. 2019. The role of environmental concern in the public acceptance of autonomous electric vehicles: A survey from China. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 60:37−46

doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2018.09.029
[29]

Yan Y, Zhong S, Tian J, Li T. 2022. Continuance intention of autonomous buses: an empirical analysis based on passenger experience. Transport Policy 126:85−95

doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2022.07.010
[30]

Madigan R, Louw T, Dziennus M, Graindorge T, Ortega E, et al. 2016. Acceptance of Automated Road Transport Systems (ARTS): an adaptation of the UTAUT model. Transportation Research Procedia 14:2217−26

doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.237
[31]

Korkmaz H, Fidanoglu A, Ozcelik S, Okumus A. 2021. User acceptance of Autonomous Public Transport Systems (APTS): extended UTAUT2 model. Journal of Public Transportation 23:100013

doi: 10.5038/2375-0901.23.1.5
[32]

Moták L, Neuville E, Chambres P, Marmoiton F, Monéger F, et al. 2017. Antecedent variables of intentions to use an autonomous shuttle: Moving beyond TAM and TPB? European Review of Applied Psychology 67:269−78

doi: 10.1016/j.erap.2017.06.001
[33]

Rejali S, Aghabayk K, Mohammadi A, Shiwakoti N. 2024. Evaluating public a priori acceptance of autonomous modular transit using an extended unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. Journal of Public Transportation 26:100081

doi: 10.1016/j.jpubtr.2024.100081
[34]

Salonen A, Haavisto N. 2019. Towards autonomous transportation. Passengers' experiences, perceptions and feelings in a driverless shuttle bus in Finland. Sustainability 11(3):588

doi: 10.3390/su11030588
[35]

Wu K, Zhao Y, Zhu Q, Tan X, Zheng H. 2011. A meta-analysis of the impact of trust on technology acceptance model: Investigation of moderating influence of subject and context type. International Journal of Information Management 31:572−81

doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2011.03.004
[36]

Wang L, Li W, Weng J, Zhang D, Ma W. 2023. Do low-carbon rewards incentivize people to ridesplitting? Evidence from structural analysis. Transportation 50:2077−109

doi: 10.1007/s11116-022-10302-y
[37]

Schubring S, Lorscheid I, Meyer M, Ringle CM. 2016. The PLS agent: Predictive modeling with PLS-SEM and agent-based simulation. Journal of Business Research 69:4604−12

doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.03.052
[38]

Leguina A. 2015. A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). International Journal of Research & Method in Education 38:220−21
[39]

Tao D, Yuan J, Shao F, Li D, Zhou Q, et al. 2018. Factors affecting consumer acceptance of an online health information portal among young internet users. Computers, Informatics, Nursing 36:530−39

doi: 10.1097/CIN.0000000000000467
[40]

Marangunić N, Granić A. 2015. Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Universal Access in the Information Society 14:81−95

doi: 10.1007/s10209-014-0348-1
[41]

Liu P, Yang R, Xu Z. 2019. How safe is safe enough for self-driving vehicles? Risk Analysis 39:315−25

doi: 10.1111/risa.13116
[42]

Kyriakidis M, Happee R, de Winter JCF. 2015. Public opinion on automated driving: results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 32:127−40

doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.014
[43]

Bansal P, Kockelman KM, Singh A. 2016. Assessing public opinions of and interest in new vehicle technologies: an Austin perspective. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 67:1−14

doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.019
[44]

Jabbari P, Auld J, MacKenzie D. 2022. How do perceptions of safety and car ownership importance affect autonomous vehicle adoption? Travel Behaviour and Society 28:128−40

doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2022.02.002
[45]

Chiu CM, Wang ETG. 2008. Understanding web-based learning continuance intention: the role of subjective task value. Information & Management 45:194−201

doi: 10.1016/j.im.2008.02.003
[46]

Rezaei A, Caulfield B. 2020. Examining public acceptance of autonomous mobility. Travel Behaviour and Society 21:235−46

doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2020.07.002