[1]

Leon RG, Oreja FH, Mirsky SB, Reberg-Horton C. 2023. Addressing biases in replacement series: the importance of reference density selection for interpretation of competition outcomes. Weed Science 71:606−14

doi: 10.1017/wsc.2023.53
[2]

Luo CL, Duan HX, Wang YL, Liu HJ, Xu SX. 2024. Complementarity and competitive trade-offs enhance forage productivity, nutritive balance, land and water use, and economics in legume-grass intercropping. Field Crops Research 319:e109642

doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109642
[3]

Bianchi MA, Fleck NG, Lamego FP. 2006. Proportion among soybean and competitor plants and the relations of mutual interference. Ciência Rural 36:1380−87 (in Portuguese)

doi: 10.1590/S0103-84782006000500006
[4]

Agostinetto D, Fontana LC, Vargas L, Markus C, Oliveira E. 2013. Relative competitive ability of crabgrass in coexistence with flooded rice and soybean. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira 48:1315−22 (in Portuguese)

doi: 10.1590/S0100-204X2013001000002
[5]

Rubin RS, Langaro, AC, Mariani F, Agostinetto D, Berto RM. 2014. Relative competitive ability of irrigated rice with red rice susceptible or resistant to the herbicide imazapyr + imazapic. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 81:173−79 (in Portuguese)

doi: 10.1590/1808-1657001242012
[6]

Nosratti I, Korres NE, Cordeau S. 2023. Knowledge of cover crop seed traits and treatments to enhance weed suppression: a narrative review. Agronomy 13:1683

doi: 10.3390/agronomy13071683
[7]

Brunetto L, Galon L, Cavaletti DC, Munareto JD, Castamann A, et al. 2023. Competitive response and level of economic damage of quinoa in the presence of ryegrass. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias [Brazilian Journal of Agricultural Sciences] 18:e2543

doi: 10.5039/agraria.v18i1a2543
[8]

dos Santos Caldas JV, da Silva AG, Braz GBP, de Oliveira Procópio S, Teixeira IR, et al. 2023. Weed competition on soybean varieties from different relative maturity groups. Agriculture 13:725

doi: 10.3390/agriculture13030725
[9]

Jastrzębska M, Kostrzewska MK, Marks M. 2023. Is diversified crop rotation an effective non-chemical strategy for protecting triticale yield and weed diversity? Agronomy 13:1589

doi: 10.3390/agronomy13061589
[10]

García-Parra M, Zurita-Silva A, Stechauner-Rohringer R, Roa-Acosta D, Jacobsen SE. 2020. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) and its relationship with agroclimatic characteristics: a Colombian perspective. Chilean Journal of Agricultural Research 80:290−302

doi: 10.4067/S0718-58392020000200290
[11]

Minh NV, Nguyen TV. 2021. Assessment of yield and quality of quinoa accessions grown in Ferralsols following seasonal difference. Australian Journal of Crop Science 15:1485−91

doi: 10.21475/ajcs.21.15.12.p3429
[12]

Rigoli RP, Agostinetto D, Schaedler CE, Dal Magro T, Tironi S. 2008. Relative competitive ability of wheat (Triticum aestivum) intercropped with Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) or wild radish (Raphanus raphanistrum). Planta Daninha 26:93−100 (in Portuguese)

doi: 10.1590/S0100-83582008000100010
[13]

Galon L, Agazzi LR, Vargas L, Nonemacher F, Basso FJM, et al. Winter FL. 2015. Competitive ability of canola hybrids with weeds. Planta Daninha 33:413−23

doi: 10.1590/S0100-83582015000300004
[14]

Agostinetto D, Tarouco CP, Nohatto MA, Oliveira C, Fraga DS. 2017. Metabolic activity of wheat and ryegrass plants in competition. Planta Daninha 35:e017155463

doi: 10.1590/s0100-83582017350100044
[15]

Franz E, Tironi SP, da Luz GL, Cezarotto LA, Zago DV, et al. 2020. Competitive ability of canola cultivars in competition with turnip. Brazilian Journal of Development 6:82507−23

doi: 10.34117/bjdv6n10-617
[16]

Michelon CJ, Costa L, Padilha LR, Balem R. 2021. Control ryegrass and wild radish in wheat with post-emergent herbicides. Revista de Ciência e Inovação 6:1−12

[17]

Chaudhari S, Jennings KM, Culpepper S, Batts RB, Bellinder R. 2019. Turnip tolerance to preplant incorporated trifluralin. Weed Technology 33:123−27

doi: 10.1017/wet.2018.66
[18]

Streck EV, Kämpf N, Dalmolin RSD, Klamt E, Nascimento PC, et al. 2018. Solos do Rio Grande do Sul. 3rd edition. Porto Alegre: UFRGS, EMATER/RS ASCAR (in Portuguese) www.bibliotecaagptea.org.br/agricultura/solos/livros/SOLOS%203%20EDICAO.pdf

[19]

Tedesco MJ, Gianello C, Bissani CA, Bohnem H, Volkweiss SJ. 1995. Soil, Plant, and Other Material Analyses. Technical Bulletin, 5. 2nd edition, revised and expanded. Porto Alegre, RS: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (in Portuguese) https://rolas.cnpt.embrapa.br/publico/pManual

[20]

Cousens R, O'Neill M. 1993. Density dependence of replacement series experiments. Oikos 66:347−52

doi: 10.2307/3544824
[21]

Kumar K, Kumar V, Malik JK. 2023. Essential nutrients for plant growth, nutrient functions and deficiency symptoms: a review. Dizhen Dizhi Journal 15:35−45

[22]

Bonato Asato AE, Guimarães-Steinicke C, Stein G, Schreck B, Kattenborn T, et al. 2025. Seasonal shifts in plant diversity effects on above-ground–below-ground phenological synchrony. Journal of Ecology 113:472−84

doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.14470
[23]

Gasparetto IG, Galon L, Müller C, Brandler D, Tonin RJ, et al. 2024. Morphophysiological responses of bean cultivars in competition with Conyza bonariensis. Revista Caatinga 37:e11333

doi: 10.1590/1983-21252024v3711333rc
[24]

Bernardi NDC, Melo TS, Parfitt JMB, Deuner S, Ribeiro IB, et al. 2024. Ecophysiological adaptability of rice sown on residual ridges of previous soybean cultivation. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy 46:e66966

doi: 10.4025/actasciagron.v46i1.66966
[25]

Lima N, Sodré G, Lima H, Paiva S, Kaiowá A, et al. 2017. Phenotypic plasticity. Revista Ciência Elementar 5:017

doi: 10.24927/rce2017.017
[26]

Spehar CR, Rocha JES, Santos LRB. 2011. Agronomic performance and recommendations for quinoa (BRS Syetetuba) crop in the Brazilian Savannah. Pesquisa Agropecuária Tropical 41:145−47

[27]

Pierik R, Ballaré CL. 2021. Control of plant growth and defense by photoreceptors: from mechanisms to opportunities in agriculture. Molecular Plant 14:61−76

doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.11.021
[28]

Galon L, Agazzi LR, Nonemacher F, Basso FJM, Winter FL, et al. 2017. Competitive relative ability of barley cultivars in interaction with turnip. Planta Daninha 35:e017164016

doi: 10.1590/s0100-83582017350100012
[29]

da Costa LO, Rizzardi MA. 2015. Competitive ability of wheat in association with biotypes of Raphanus raphanistrum L. resistant and susceptible to ALS inhibitor herbicides. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 39:121−30

doi: 10.1590/s1413-70542015000200003
[30]

Pies W, Werlang T, Luz ACP, Galon L, Tironi, SP. 2019. Competitive barley ability coexisting with ryegrass densities. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias [Brazilian Journal of Agricultural Sciences] 4:1−6

doi: 10.5039/agraria.v14i2a5630