doi:10.48130/emst-0025-0021

[1]

Sophianopoulos SD, Deri AE. 2000. State of the Art Report on Connection Performance (FEMA-355D). Washington DC: World Journal of Mechanics www.nehrp.gov/pdf/fema355d.pdf

[2]

Sherman DR. 1996. Designing with structural tubing. Engineering Journal 33:101−9

doi: 10.62913/engj.v33i3.666

[3]

Mirghaderi SR, Torabian S, Keshavarzi F. 2010. I-beam to box–column connection by a vertical plate passing through the column. Engineering Structures 32:2034−48

doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.03.002

[4]

Goswami R, Murty CVR. 2008. Improved configuration of I-beam to box column connections in seismic steel moment frames. Proceedings of the 14^th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, 12−17 October, 2008. Analytical Chemistry www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/14_05-05-0011.PDF

[5]

Ghobadi MS, Ghassemieh M, Mazroi A, Abolmaali A. 2009. Seismic performance of ductile welded connections using T-stiffener. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 65:766−75

doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.05.007

[6]

Lee SL, Ting LC, Shanmugam NE. 1993. Use of external T-stiffeners in box-column to I-beam connections. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 26:77−98

doi: 10.1016/0143-974X(93)90030-V

[7]

Ting LC, Shanmugam NE, Lee SL. 1993. Design of I-beam to box-column connections stiffened externally. Engineering Journal 30:141−49

doi: 10.62913/engj.v30i4.1279

[8]

Choi SM, Park SH, Yun YS, Kim JH. 2010. A study on the seismic performance of concrete-filled square steel tube column-to-beam connections reinforced with asymmetric lower diaphragms. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 66:962−70

doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.01.004

[9]

Yang C, Yang JF, Su MZ, Liu CZ. 2016. Numerical study on seismic behaviours of ConXL biaxial moment connection. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 121:185−201

doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.02.013

[10]

The AISC Board of Directors. 2010. ANSI/AISC 358-10 Prequalified Connections for Special and Intermediate Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Applications. 2010. Chicago: American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) www.aisc.org/products/publication/historic-standards/prequalified-connections/prequalified-connections-for-special-and-intermediate-steel-moment-frames-ansiaisc-358-10/

[11]

Rezaeian A, Jamal-Omidi M, Shahidi F. 2014. Seismic behavior of ConXL rigid connection in box-columns not filled with concrete. Journal of Constructional Steel Research 97:79−104

doi: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2013.12.005

[12]

Shahidi F, Rezaeian A, Jamal-Omidi M, Shahidi F. 2015. Investigation of the ConXL moment connection cyclic behavior in box columns without filling concrete with different arrangement of collar bolts. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 24:317−50

doi: 10.1002/tal.1167

[13]

Moncayo-Matute FP, Chicaiza-Machuca DF, Vélez-Sisalima IS, Torres-Jara PB, Vázquez-Silva E. 2024. Seismic behavior of flange-web welded plate connections in tubular and concrete-filled columns using finite element analysis. Applied Sciences 14:6494

doi: 10.3390/app14156494

[14]

Ramirez Ortiz C, Areiza Palma G, Gutierrez Amador A, Ramirez Duque J, Cano Buitron R, et al. 2022. Seismic behavior of a steel beam-to-concrete-filled steel tubular column connection using external diaphragms. Applied Sciences 12:3618

doi: 10.3390/app12073618

[15]

Tsai, KC, Lin KC, Liu MC. 1992. Seismic behavior of steel beam-t-box column connections. Proceedings of the 10^th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, Spain, 19−24 July, 1992. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema. pp. 2903–9 www.iitk.ac.in/nicee/wcee/article/10_vol5_2903.pdf

[16]

Mirghaderi R. Mahmoud M. 2006. Seismic behaviour of panel zones in beam to column connections with non-planner webs in moment resisting steel frames. Proceedings of the 4^th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Taipei, Taiwan, 12−13 October, 2006. Taipei, Taiwan, China: National Center for Research on Earthquake Engineering (NCREE). pp. 1545–52 www.researchgate.net/publication/242136975

[17]

Comité Euro-International du Béton. 1998. Seismic design of reinforced concrete structures for controlled inelastic response: design concepts. Leeds, UK: Emerald Publishing Limited. doi: 10.1680/sdorcsfcir.26414

[18]

Wang Y. 2008. Lessons learned from the “5.12” Wenchuan earthquake: evaluation of earthquake performance objectives and the importance of seismic conceptual design principles. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 7:255−62

doi: 10.1007/s11803-008-0886-8

[19]

Leon R, Jirsa JO. 1986. Bidirectional loading of R.C. beam-column joints. Earthquake Spectra 2:537−64

doi: 10.1193/1.1585397

[20]

Akguzel U, Pampanin S. 2010. Effects of variation of axial load and bidirectional loading on seismic performance of GFRP retrofitted reinforced concrete exterior beam-column joints. Journal of Composites for Construction 14:94−104

doi: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0268(2010)14:1(94)

[21]

Zheng Q, Chen S, Lin W. 2024. Numerical study on seismic performance of a new prefabricated reinforced concrete structural system integrated with recoverable energy-dissipating RC walls. Buildings 14:3243

doi: 10.3390/buildings14103243

[22]

Kawaguchi J, Morino S, Sugimoto T. 1996. Elasto-Plastic Behavior of Concrete-Filled Steel Tubular Frames. Proceeding of an Engineering Foundation Conference, New York, USA, 2–7 June, 1996. New York, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). pp. 272–81 www.researchgate.net/publication/37672090

[23]

Fan JS, Zhou H, Nie JG, Li QW. 2012. Research on seismic responses of 3D joints with CFT column and composite beam under bi-directional loading. Journal of Building Structures 33:50−58 (in Chinese)

doi: 10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2012.06.016

[24]

Li W, Yang Y, Kong Z, Huang W, Wang Y, et al. 2024. Cyclic performance and environmental impact of precast demountable RCS joints. Buildings 14:3071

doi: 10.3390/buildings14103071

[25]

Li L, Mander JB, Dhakal RP. 2008. Bidirectional cyclic loading experiment on a 3D beam–column joint designed for damage avoidance. Journal of Structural Engineering 134:1733−42

doi: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2008)134:11(1733)

[26]

Amaris A, Pampanin S, Palermo A. 2006. Uni and bi-directional quasi static tests on alternative hybrid precast beam column joint subassemblies. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering 2006 Conference (NZSEE 2006), Napier, New Zealand, 10–12 March, 2006. Napier, New Zealand: University of Canterbury. Civil Engineering. pp. 1–8 https://ir.canterbury.ac.nz/items/e4706d80-1b03-4f05-893e-7c419bacb6ee

[27]

Pekgokgoz RK, Yakut I. 2024. Investigation of passive controlled post-tensioning system on the structural behaviour of precast reinforced concrete beam–column connections. Buildings 14:3910

doi: 10.3390/buildings14123910

[28]

Gemechu TD, Lu L. 2024. Analysis of factors affecting the seismic performance of widened flange connections in mid-flange H-beams and box columns. Buildings 14:3170

doi: 10.3390/buildings14103170

[29]

Gallegos M, Nuñez E, Herrera R. 2020. Numerical study on cyclic response of end-plate biaxial moment connection in box columns. Metals 10:523

doi: 10.3390/met10040523

[30]

Green TP, Leon RT, Rassati GA. 2004. Bidirectional tests on partially restrained, composite beam-to-column connections. Journal of Structural Engineering 130:320−27

doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:2(320)

[31]

Wang W, Chen Y, Li W, Leon RT. 2011. Bidirectional seismic performance of steel beam to circular tubular column connections with outer diaphragm. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 40:1063−81

doi: 10.1002/eqe.1070

[32]

Wang W, Lyu X, Zheng J, Yi S, Li J, et al. 2024. Post-fire seismic performance of concrete-filled steel tube frame structures considering soil-structure interaction (SSI). Buildings 14:555

doi: 10.3390/buildings14020555

[33]

Dehcheshmeh EM, Rashed P, Broujerdian V, Shakouri A, Aslani F. 2023. Predicting seismic collapse safety of post-fire steel moment frames. Buildings 13:1091

doi: 10.3390/buildings13041091

[34]

The Committee on Specifications. 2022. Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings (ANSI/AISC 341-22). Chicago, IL, USA: American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) 546 pp. www.aisc.org/Seismic-Provisions-for-Structural-Steel-Buildings-ANSIAISC-341-22-Download

[35]

The Connection Prequalification Review Panel. 2022. Prequalified Connections for Special and Intermediate Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Applications (ANSI/AISC 358-22). Chicago, IL, USA: American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC). 358 pp. www.aisc.org/products/publication/standards/aisc-358/prequalified-connections-for-special-and-intermediate-steel-moment-frames-for-seismic-applications/

[36]

ASTM International. 2021. Standard Specification for Alloy Steel Socket-Head Cap Screws (ASTM A574-21). West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International. pp. 1−7 doi: 10.1520/A0574-21

[37]

International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 2014. Fire resistance tests—Elements of building construction—Part 11: Specific requirements for the assessment of fire protection to structural steel elements (ISO 834-11:2014). Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization (ISO). pp. 1–53 www.iso.org/standard/57595.html

[38]

European Commission. 2002. Eurocode 1: Actions on structures—Part 1-2: General actions—Actions on structu res exposed to fire (EN 1991-1-2:2002). Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization (CEN). pp. 1–63 https://eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu/EN-Eurocodes/eurocode-1-actions-structures

[39]

Franssen JM, Vila Real P. 2016. Fire Design of Steel Structures: EC1: Actions on structures—Part 1-2: Actions on structure exposed to fire; EC3: Design of steel structures—Part 1-2: Structural fire design. 2^nd Edition. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. pp. 1–450 doi: 10.1002/9783433607008

[40]

Rasoulnia A, Broujerdian V, Ghamari A. 2024. An improved flexural design procedure of steel plate I-girders considering elastic lateral torsional buckling at elevated temperatures. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 33:e2171

doi: 10.1002/tal.2171

[41]

ConXtech. 2022. The Structural Steel Building System That is Simply Better for Institutional Projects (Technical Brochure). Pleasanton, CA, USA: ConXtech. https://www.conxtech.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/Conxtech-Education-Experience.pdf