doi:10.48130/emst-0025-0023

[1]

Abdolhamidzadeh B, Abbasi T, Rashtchian D, Abbasi SA. 2011. Domino effect in process-industry accidents–an inventory of past events and identification of some patterns. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 24:575−93

doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2010.06.013

[2]

Chen C, Reniers G, Zhang L. 2018. An innovative methodology for quickly modeling the spatial-temporal evolution of domino accidents triggered by fire. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 54:312−24

doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2018.04.012

[3]

Cozzani V, Gubinelli G, Antonioni G, Spadoni G, Zanelli S. 2005. The assessment of risk caused by domino effect in quantitative area risk analysis. Journal of Hazardous Materials 127:14−30

doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.07.003

[4]

Gholamizadeh K, Alauddin M, Aliabadi MM, Soltanzade A, Mohammadfam I. 2023. Comprehensive failure analysis in Tehran refinery fire accident: application of accimap methodology and quantitative domino effect analysis. Fire Technology 59:453−72

doi: 10.1007/s10694-022-01348-6

[5]

Planas E, Pastor E, Casal J, Bonilla JM. 2015. Analysis of the boiling liquid expanding vapor explosion (BLEVE) of a liquefied natural gas road tanker: the Zarzalico accident. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 34:127−38

doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2015.01.026

[6]

Amendola A, Contini S. 1998. A methodology for risk analysis of industrial areas: the aripar case study. In Risk assessment and management in the context of the seveso II directive, eds. Kirchsteiger C, Christou MD, Papadakis GA. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 313−39 doi: 10.1016/s0921-9110(98)80016-5

[7]

Casal J. 2018. Quantitative risk analysis. In Evaluation of the Effects and Consequences of Major Accidents in Industrial Plants. 2^nd Edition. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 439−81 doi: 10.1016/b978-0-444-63883-0.00011-3

[8]

Ding L, Khan F, Guo X, Ji J. 2021. A novel approach to reduce fire-induced domino effect risk by leveraging loading/unloading demands in chemical industrial parks. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 146:610−19

doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.11.050

[9]

Fabiano B, Currò F, Reverberi AP. 2020. Domino effect by pool fire radiation on pipelines: an applicative case-study. Chemical Engineering Transactions 82:265−70

doi: 10.3303/CET2082045

[10]

Tixier J, Dusserre G, Salvi O, Gaston D. 2002. Review of 62 risk analysis methodologies of industrial plants. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 15:291−303

doi: 10.1016/S0950-4230(02)00008-6

[11]

Jones R, Lehr W, Simecek-Beatty D, Reynolds M. 2013. ALOHA® (Areal Locations of Hazardous Atmospheres) 5.4. 4: Technical Documentation. Seattle, WA: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service, Office of Response and Restoration, Emergency Response Division. 96 pp. https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/2669

[12]

DOE-EH-4.2.1.3-ALOHA Code Guidance. 2004. ALOHA Computer Code Application Guidance for Documented Safety Analysis. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Environment, Safety and Health. 115 pp. www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2013/09/f2/Final_ALOHA_Guidance_Reportv52404.pdf

[13]

Dhurandher BK, Kumar R, Dhiman A. 2015. Impact assessment of thermal radiation hazard from LPG fireball. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science 11:499−506

doi: 10.1016/j.proeps.2015.06.050

[14]

Çetinyokuş S. 2017. Determination of explosion, fire and toxic emission physical effect areas. Pamukkale University Journal of Engineering Sciences 23:845−53

[15]

Vílchez JA, Sevilla S, Montiel H, Casal J. 1995. Historical analysis of accidents in chemical plants and in the transportation of hazardous materials. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 8:87−96

doi: 10.1016/0950-4230(95)00006-M

[16]

Cozzani V, Antonioni G, Khakzad N, Khan F, Taveau J, et al. 2013. Quantitative assessment of risk caused by domino accidents. In Domino Effects in the Process Industries Modelling, Prevention and Managing, eds. Reniers G, Cozzani V. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 208−28 doi: 10.1016/b978-0-444-54323-3.00010-5

[17]

Center for Chemical Process Safety. 2007. Guidelines for Risk Based Process Safety. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. Inc. 768 pp. www.wiley.com/en-us/Guidelines+for+Risk+Based+Process+Safety-p-9781118209639

[18]

International Organization for Standardization. 2018. Risk management—Guidelines (ISO Standard No. 31000). 2^nd Edition. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization. 16 pp. https://www.iso.org/standard/65694.html

[19]

Razak NA. 2024. Development of Safety Leading and Lagging Indicators Framework for Contractor Selection in Construction Projects. Thesis. The University of Manchester, UK. 257 pp. https://pure.manchester.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/349289116/FULL_TEXT.PDF

[20]

European Parliament, Council of the European Union. 2011. Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (codification) Text with EEA relevance. Luxembourg, Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Union L 26. pp. 1–21. Amended by Directive 2014/52/EU http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2011/92/oj

[21]

United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. 2022. Annual Report 2022: Connecting Countries, Recovering Better, Driving Progress, Improving Lives. Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations. 31 pp. https://unece.org/annual-report-2022

[22]

European Parliament, Council of the European Union. 1999. Directive 1999/92/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1999 on minimum requirements for improving the safety and health protection of workers potentially at risk from explosive atmospheres (15^th individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC). Luxembourg, Luxembourg: Official Journal of the European Union L 23. pp. 57−64 https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:31999L0092&from=EN

[23]

Directorate-General for Environment. 2025. Seveso III Implementation Report: European industrial safety improved. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/news/seveso-report-european-industrial-safety-improved-2025-09-19_en

[24]

Occupational Safety and Health Administration. 2023. OSHA Publishes 2023 Injury and Illness Data. Washington, DC, USA: US Department of Labor

[25]

Vanuzzo M, Carcassi M. 2011. Safety distances: comparison of the methodologies for their determination. International Conference on Hydrogen Safety, San Francisco, California, USA, 12−14 September, 2011. USA: HySafe Association. 10 pp. https://h2tools.org/sites/default/files/2019-08/paper_75.pdf

[26]

Zhou L, Chen Z. 2020. Are CGE models reliable for disaster impact analyses? Economic Systems Research 33:20−46

doi: 10.1080/09535314.2020.1780566

[27]

Kletz TA. 1999. Hazop & Hazan Identifying and Assessing Process Industry Hazards. 4^th Edition. Boca Raton: CRC Press. 232 pp. doi: 10.1201/9780203752227

[28]

Hendershot DC. 2011. Inherently safer design: an overview of key elements. Professional safety 56:48−55

[29]

Ministry of Environment and Urbanization, Ministry of Family, Labor and Social Services, Ministry of Internal Affairs (Türkiye). 2019. Regulation on prevention of major industrial accidents and lessening their adverse impacts. Ankara: The Official Gazette. www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2019/05/20190501-5.htm?initialSessionID=257-3112766-8868913&ld=ASXXSCTTRDirect

[30]

European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC). 2024. EUROPA - eMARS Dashboard - European Commission. https://emars.jrc.ec.europa.eu/en/emars/content

[31]

Sun J, Sun D, Asif M, Fang B, Bai Y, et al. 2021. Insight into the safety distance of ground and underground installations in typical petrochemical plants. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 69:104355

doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104355

[32]

Ozkilic O. 2014. Risk Assessment Atex Directives - Prevention of Major Industrial Accidents in Explosive Atmospheres and Reducing Their Effects - Quantitative Risk Assessment. Ankara: TISK. pp. 1−422.

[33]

Chamber of Chemical Engineers (Turkey). 2023. Baca Gazı Arıtma Sistemlerine İlişkin Tebliğ Taslağı Hakkında Odamız Görüşü [Our Chamber's Opinion on the Draft Communiqué on Flue Gas Treatment Systems]. Ankara, Turkey: TMMOB. www.kmo.org.tr/genel/bizden_detay.php?kod=1725

[34]

Alileche N, Cozzani V, Reniers G, Estel L. 2015. Thresholds for domino effects and safety distances in the process industry: a review of approaches and regulations. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 143:74−84

doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.04.007

[35]

Cozzani V, Salzano E. 2017. Technological hazard characterization. In Natech Risk Assessment and Management, eds. Krausmann E, Cruz AM, Salzano E. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 91−103 doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-803807-9.00006-1

[36]

Cozzani V, Salzano E, Campedel M, Sabatini M, Spadoni G. 2007. The assessment of major accident hazards caused by external events. Proceedings of 12^th International Symposium on Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries, Edinburgh, UK, 22−24 May, 2007. Rugby, UK: IchemE. pp. 331−36 https://cris.unibo.it/handle/11585/49660

[37]

Lees FP. 1980. Fire loss prevention in the process industries. London, Boston: Butterworths. pp. 477−634 www.academia.edu/13334225/Loss_Prevention_in_the_Process_Industries

[38]

Bagster DF, Pitblado R. 1991. The Estimation of domino incident frequencies−an approach. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 69:195−99

[39]

Ham JM, Schaafsma J. 1999. Implementation of SEVESO-2 requirements in the Netherlands. Proc. International Conference and Workshop on Modeling the Consequences of Accidental Releases of Hazardous Materials, San Francisco, CA, USA, September 28−October 1, 1999. New York: American Institute of Chemical Engineers. pp. 625−33 https://repository.tno.nl/SingleDoc?find=UID%202ea6c81f-4e94-41a6-ba61-8aa75de71abe

[40]

Cozzani V, Zanelli S. 2001. An approach to the assessment of domino accidents hazard in quantitative area risk analysis. Loss Prevention and Safety Promotion in the Process Industries Proceedings of the 10^th International Symposium, Stockholm, Sweden, 19–21 June, 2001. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 1263−74. doi: 10.1016/b978-044450699-3/50040-9

[41]

Swuste P, van Nunen K, Reniers G, Khakzad N. 2019. Domino effects in chemical factories and clusters: an historical perspective and discussion. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 124:18−30

doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2019.01.015

[42]

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2024. Propane (C3H8). Boulder, CO, USA: NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory. https://cameochemicals.noaa.gov/chemical/9018

[43]

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2024. Butane (C4H10). Boulder, CO, USA: NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory. https://cameochemicals.noaa.gov/chemical/5668

[44]

Naderpour M, Khakzad N. 2018. Texas LPG fire: domino effects triggered by natural hazards. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 116:354−64

doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2018.03.008

[45]

Clancey VJ. 1972. Diagnostic features of explosion damage. Proc. 6^th International Meeting of Forensic Sciences, Edinburgh, Scotland, 1972. London: Taylor & Francis. https://explosion-safety.securesite.jp/program/e_blast_i.php

[46]

Cetinyokus S. 2017. Effect of atmospheric choices on the impact distances determined by consequence analysis (ALOHA Software). Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Science and Engineering Sciences 17:209−17

doi: 10.5578/fmbd.52776