[1]

Spohn W. 2014. The Laws of Belief – Ranking Theory and its Philosophical Applications. UK: Oxford University Press. http://ukcatalogue.oup.com/product/9780198705857.do
[2]

Kern-Isberner G. 2004. A thorough axiomatization of a principle of conditional preservation in belief revision. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 40(1):127−164

doi: 10.1023/A:1026110129951
[3]

Beierle C, Eichhorn C, Kern-Isberner G, Kutsch S. 2021. Properties and interrelationships of skeptical, weakly skeptical, and credulous inference induced by classes of minimal models. Artificial Intelligence 297:103489

doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2021.103489
[4]

Beierle C, Hermsen R, Kern-Isberner G. 2014. Observations on the minimality of ranking functions for qualitative conditional knowlegde bases and their computation. Proceedings of the 27th International FLAIRS Conference, Pensacola Beach, Florida, USA, May 21–23, 2014, eds. Eberle W, Boonthum-Denecke C. US: AAAI Press. pp. 480–485 https://cdn.aaai.org/ocs/7831/7831-36822-1-PB.pdf
[5]

Wilhelm M, Kern-Isberner G, Beierle C. 2024. Core c-representations and c-core closure for conditional belief bases. In Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. pp. 104−122 doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-56940-1_6
[6]

Beierle C, Eichhorn C, Kern-Isberner G. 2016. Skeptical inference based on c-representations and its characterization as a constraint satisfaction problem. In Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems. Cham: Springer. pp. 65−82 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-30024-5_4
[7]

Beierle C, Eichhorn C, Kern-Isberner G, Kutsch S. 2018. Properties of skeptical c-inference for conditional knowledge bases and its realization as a constraint satisfaction problem. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 83(3):247−275

doi: 10.1007/s10472-017-9571-9
[8]

Adams EW. 1966. Probability and the logic of conditionals. In Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics: Aspects of Inductive Logic, eds. Hintikka J, Suppes P. vol. 43. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 265−316 doi: 10.1016/s0049-237x(08)71673-2
[9]

Goldszmidt M, Pearl J. 1996. Qualitative probabilities for default reasoning, belief revision, and causal modeling. Artificial Intelligence 84:57−112

doi: 10.1016/0004-3702(95)00090-9
[10]

Pearl J. 2022. System Z: a natural ordering of defaults with tractable applications to nonmonotonic reasoning. Probabilistic and Causal Inference: The Works of Judea Pearl. New York, NY, USA: ACM. pp. 201−214 doi: 10.1145/3501714.3501730
[11]

Beierle C. 2019. Inferential equivalence, normal forms, and isomorphisms of knowledge bases in institutions of conditional logics. Proceedings of the 34th ACM/SIGAPP Symposium on Applied Computing. Limassol Cyprus, April 8−12, 2019. New York, United States: ACM. pp. 1131−1138 doi: 10.1145/3297280.3297391
[12]

Benferhat S, Dubois D, Prade H. 1992. Representing default rules in possibilistic logic. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR'92). Cambridge, MA, USA, October 25–29, 1992. US: Morgan Kaufmann. pp. 673–684 https://dblp.org/rec/conf/kr/BenferhatDP92.html
[13]

Goldszmidt M, Pearl J. 1991. On the Relation Between Rational Closure and System Z. Technical Report, CSD-910043. University of California, Los Angeles, USA. https://ftp.cs.ucla.edu/tech-report/1991-reports/910043.pdf
[14]

Lehmann D, Magidor M. 1992. What does a conditional knowledge base entail? Artificial Intelligence 55(1):1−60

doi: 10.1016/0004-3702(92)90041-U
[15]

Beierle C, Haldimann J, Kern-Isberner G. 2021. Semantic splitting of conditional belief bases. In Logic, Computation and Rigorous Methods. Cham: Springer. pp. 82−95 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-76020-5_5
[16]

Beierle C, Kutsch S, Sauerwald K. 2019. Compilation of static and evolving conditional knowledge bases for computing induced nonmonotonic inference relations. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 87(1):5−41

doi: 10.1007/s10472-019-09653-7
[17]

Wilhelm M, Sezgin M, Kern-Isberner G, Haldimann J, Beierle C, et al. 2023. Splitting techniques for conditional belief bases in the context of c-representations. In Logics in Artificial Intelligence. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. pp. 462−477 doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-43619-2_32
[18]

Kern-Isberner G, Beierle C, Brewka G. 2020. Syntax splitting = relevance + independence: new postulates for nonmonotonic reasoning from conditional belief bases. Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. September 12-18, 2020, Rhodes, Greece. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization. pp. 560−571 doi: 10.24963/kr.2020/56
[19]

Lukasiewicz T. 2005. Weak nonmonotonic probabilistic logics. Artificial Intelligence 168(1−2):119−161

doi: 10.1016/j.artint.2005.05.005
[20]

Kraus S, Lehmann D, Magidor M. 1990. Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artificial Intelligence 44:167−207

doi: 10.1016/0004-3702(90)90101-5
[21]

Reiter R. 1980. A logic for default reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 13:81−132

doi: 10.1016/0004-3702(80)90014-4
[22]

Schurz G, Thorn PD. 2012. Reward versus risk in uncertain inference: theorems and simulations. The Review of Symbolic Logic 5(4):574−612

doi: 10.1017/s1755020312000184
[23]

Casini G, Meyer T, Varzinczak I. 2019. Taking defeasible entailment beyond rational closure. In Logics in Artificial Intelligence. Cham: Springer. pp. 182−197 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-19570-0_12
[24]

Bochman A. 2001. A logical theory of nonmonotonic inference and belief change. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-04560-2
[25]

Parikh R. 1999. Beliefs, Belief Revision, and Splitting Languages. Center for the Study of Language and Information. pp. 266–278 www.sci.brooklyn.cuny.edu/cis/parikh/mossn27.pdf
[26]

Benferhat S, Dubois D, Prade H. 2005. Possibilistic logic: from nonmonotonicity to logic programming. In Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. pp. 17−24 doi: 10.1007/bfb0028177
[27]

Heyninck J, Kern-Isberner G, Meyer TA, Haldimann JP, Beierle C. 2023. Conditional syntax splitting for non-monotonic inference operators. Proceedings of the 37th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Washington, DC, USA, February 7–14, 2023. US: AAAI Press. pp. 6416–6424 doi: 10.1609/aaai.v37i5.25789
[28]

Beierle C, Spiegel LP, Haldimann J, Wilhelm M, Heyninck J, et al. 2024. Conditional splittings of belief bases and nonmonotonic inference with c-representations. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. November 1–8, 2024. Hanoi, Vietnam. International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization. pp. 106–116 doi: 10.24963/kr.2024/10
[29]

Beierle C, Kutsch S, Breuers H. 2019. On rational monotony and weak rational monotony for inference relations induced by sets of minimal c-representations. Proceedings of the 32nd International FLAIRS Conference, Sarasota, Florida, USA, May 19–22 2019, eds. Barták R, Brawner KW. US: AAAI Press. pp. 458–463 https://cdn.aaai.org/ocs/18229/18229-78848-1-PB.pdf
[30]

Rott H. 2001. Change, choice and inference: a study of belief revision and nonmonotonic reasoning. In Oxford logic guides. vol. 42. UK: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780198503064.001.0001
[31]

Kern-Isberner G, Eichhorn C. 2014. Structural inference from conditional knowledge bases. Studia Logica 102(4):751−769

doi: 10.1007/s11225-013-9503-6
[32]

Kern-Isberner G, Spohn W. 2024. Inductive reasoning, conditionals, and belief dynamics. Journal of Applied Logics 11(1):89−127
[33]

Goldszmidt M, Morris P H, Pearl J. 1990. A maximum entropy approach to nonmonotonic reasoning. In Proceedings of the 8th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, July 29 – August 3, 1990. US: AAAI Press / MIT Press. pp. 646–652 https://cdn.aaai.org/AAAI/1990/AAAI90-097.pdf
[34]

Geffner H, Pearl J. 1990. A framework for reasoning with defaults. In Knowledge Representation and Defeasible Reasoning. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. pp. 69−87 doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-0553-5_3
[35]

Paris J. 1998. Common sense and maximum entropy. Synthese 117(1):75−93

doi: 10.1023/A:1005081609010
[36]

Lehmann D. 1995. Another perspective on default reasoning. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 15(1):61−82

doi: 10.1007/BF01535841
[37]

Heyninck J, Kern-Isberner G, Meyer TA. 2022. Conditional syntax splitting, lexicographic entailment and the drowning effect. Proceedings of the 20th International Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning, NMR 2022, Part of the Federated Logic Conference (FLoC 2022), Haifa, Israel, August 7–9, 2022. vol. 3197. CEUR-WS.org. pp. 61–69 https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3197/paper6.pdf
[38]

Haldimann J, Beierle C. 2022. Properties of system W and its relationships to other inductive inference operators. In Foundations of Information and Knowledge Systems. Cham: Springer. pp. 206−225 doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-11321-5_12
[39]

Komo C, Beierle C. 2022. Nonmonotonic reasoning from conditional knowledge bases with system W. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 90(1):107−144

doi: 10.1007/s10472-021-09777-9