[1]

Liu M, Pirrello J, Chervin C, Roustan JP, Bouzayen M. 2015. Ethylene control of fruit ripening: revisiting the complex network of transcriptional regulation. Plant Physiology 169:2380−2390

doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01361
[2]

Wuriyanghan H, Zhang B, Cao WH, Ma B, Lei G, et al. 2009. The ethylene receptor ETR2 delays floral transition and affects starch accumulation in rice. The Plant Cell 21:1473−1494

doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.065391
[3]

Etchells JP, Provost CM, Turner SR. 2012. Plant vascular cell division is maintained by an interaction between PXY and ethylene signalling. PLoS Genetics 8:e1002997

doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002997
[4]

Corbineau F, Xia Q, Bailly C, El-Maarouf-Bouteau H. 2014. Ethylene, a key factor in the regulation of seed dormancy. Frontiers in Plant Science 5:539

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00539
[5]

Dubois M, Van den Broeck L, Inzé D. 2018. The pivotal role of ethylene in plant growth. Trends in Plant Science 23:311−323

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.01.003
[6]

Van de Poel B, de Vries J. 2023. Evolution of ethylene as an abiotic stress hormone in streptophytes. Environmental and Experimental Botany 214:105456

doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2023.105456
[7]

Wang H, Cao L, Guo Y, Li Z, Niu H. 2024. Enhancer of Shoot Regeneration 2 (ESR2) regulates pollen maturation and vitality in watermelon (Citrullus lanatus). Journal of Integrative Agriculture 23:3506−3521

doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2024.05.032
[8]

Huang Y, Wu X, Liu Z, Li A, Zhang Z, et al. 2025. Ripening-related transcription factors during tomato fruit ripening: crosstalk with ethylene. Horticultural Plant Journal 11:963−973

doi: 10.1016/j.hpj.2024.03.004
[9]

Xuan X, Qu Z, Sadeghnezhad E, Xie Z, Qi Z, et al. 2025. Competitive network of polyamines metabolic and ethylene biosynthesis pathways during gibberellin-induced parthenocarpic grape fruit setting. Horticultural Plant Journal 11:1048−1065

doi: 10.1016/j.hpj.2024.07.002
[10]

Konings H, Jackson MB. 1979. A relationship between rates of ethylene production by roots and the promoting or inhibiting effects of exogenous ethylene and water on root elongation. Zeitschrift für Pflanzenphysiologie 92:385−397

doi: 10.1016/S0044-328X(79)80184-1
[11]

Khan NA. 2005. The influence of exogenous ethylene on growth and photosynthesis of mustard (Brassica juncea) following defoliation. Scientia Horticulturae 105:499−505

doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2005.02.004
[12]

Pierik R, Tholen D, Poorter H, Visser EJW, Voesenek LACJ. 2006. The Janus face of ethylene: growth inhibition and stimulation. Trends in Plant Science 11:176−183

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.02.006
[13]

Pattyn J, Vaughan-Hirsch J, Van de Poel B. 2021. The regulation of ethylene biosynthesis: a complex multilevel control circuitry. New Phytologist 229:770−782

doi: 10.1111/nph.16873
[14]

Li Z, Huang S, Liu S, Pan J, Zhang Z, et al. 2009. Molecular isolation of the M gene suggests that a conserved-residue conversion induces the formation of bisexual flowers in cucumber plants. Genetics 182:1381−1385

doi: 10.1534/genetics.109.104737
[15]

Xin T, Zhang Z, Li S, Zhang S, Li Q, et al. 2019. Genetic regulation of ethylene dosage for cucumber fruit elongation. The Plant Cell 31:1063−1076

doi: 10.1105/tpc.18.00957
[16]

Xin T, Zhang Z, Zhang Y, Li X, Wang S, et al. 2025. Recessive epistasis of a synonymous mutation confers cucumber domestication through epitranscriptomic regulation. Cell 188:4810

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2025.07.006
[17]

Lobo I. 2008. Pleiotropy: one gene can affect multiple traits. Nature Education 1:10
[18]

Solovieff N, Cotsapas C, Lee PH, Purcell SM, Smoller JW. 2013. Pleiotropy in complex traits: challenges and strategies. Nature Reviews Genetics 14:483−495

doi: 10.1038/nrg3461
[19]

Spielmann M, Mundlos S. 2016. Looking beyond the genes: the role of non-coding variants in human disease. Human Molecular Genetics 25:R157−R165

doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddw205
[20]

Swinnen G, Goossens A, Pauwels L. 2016. Lessons from domestication: targeting cis-regulatory elements for crop improvement. Trends in Plant Science 21:506−515

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.01.014
[21]

Wagner GP, Lynch VJ. 2008. The gene regulatory logic of transcription factor evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23:377−385

doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.03.006
[22]

Yocca AE, Edger PP. 2022. Current status and future perspectives on the evolution of cis-regulatory elements in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 65:102139

doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2021.102139
[23]

Tan CL, Anderson E. 2020. The new central dogma of molecular biology. Resonance 14:1−32
[24]

Tan CL, Anderson EH. 2024. Revising the central dogma: regulated, dynamic, and system-dependent information coding and decoding. BIO-Complexity 2024:1−23

doi: 10.5048/bio-c.2024.3
[25]

Hunt RC, Simhadri VL, Iandoli M, Sauna ZE, Kimchi-Sarfaty C. 2014. Exposing synonymous mutations. Trends in Genetics 30:308−321

doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2014.04.006
[26]

Wan Y, Qu K, Zhang QC, Flynn RA, Manor O, et al. 2014. Landscape and variation of RNA secondary structure across the human transcriptome. Nature 505:706−709

doi: 10.1038/nature12946
[27]

Lackey L, Coria A, Woods C, McArthur E, Laederach A. 2018. Allele-specific SHAPE-MaP assessment of the effects of somatic variation and protein binding on mRNA structure. RNA 24:513−528

doi: 10.1261/rna.064469.117
[28]

Lin Z, Zhong S, Grierson D. 2009. Recent advances in ethylene research. Journal of Experimental Botany 60:3311−3336

doi: 10.1093/jxb/erp204
[29]

Saltveit ME. 1999. Effect of ethylene on quality of fresh fruits and vegetables. Postharvest Biology and Technology 15:279−292

doi: 10.1016/S0925-5214(98)00091-X
[30]

Kenea FT. 2021. Role of ethylene in horticulture—a review. GP Globalize Research Journal of Chemistry 81:81−92
[31]

Li D, Zeng S, Dai R, Chen K. 2025. Slow and steady wins the race: the negative regulators of ethylene biosynthesis in horticultural plants. Horticulture Research 12:uhaf108

doi: 10.1093/hr/uhaf108
[32]

Wu Z, Dang Q, Ouyang S, Liu W, Huang L. 2025. Ethylene-mediated resistance to bacterial canker in kiwifruit is suppressed by cool temperature. Horticultural Plant Journal 11:1517−1528

doi: 10.1016/j.hpj.2024.03.008
[33]

Grumet R, Lin YC, Rett-Cadman S, Malik A. 2023. Morphological and genetic diversity of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) fruit development Plants 12:23

doi: 10.3390/plants12010023
[34]

Zhao J, Song W, Zhang X. 2024. Genetic and molecular regulation of fruit development in cucumber. New Phytologist 244:1742−1749

doi: 10.1111/nph.20192
[35]

Boualem A, Fergany M, Fernandez R, Troadec C, Martin A, et al. 2008. A conserved mutation in an ethylene biosynthesis enzyme leads to andromonoecy in melons. Science 321:836−838

doi: 10.1126/science.1159023
[36]

Martin A, Troadec C, Boualem A, Rajab M, Fernandez R, et al. 2009. A transposon-induced epigenetic change leads to sex determination in melon. Nature 461:1135−1138

doi: 10.1038/nature08498
[37]

Zhang S, Tan FQ, Chung CH, Slavkovic F, Devani RS, et al. 2022. The control of carpel determinacy pathway leads to sex determination in cucurbits. Science 378:543−549

doi: 10.1126/science.add4250
[38]

Zhang H, Li S, Yang L, Cai G, Chen H, et al. 2021. Gain-of-function of the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate synthase gene ACS1G induces female flower development in cucumber gynoecy. The Plant Cell 33:306−321

doi: 10.1093/plcell/koaa018
[39]

Boualem A, Troadec C, Camps C, Lemhemdi A, Morin H, et al. 2015. A cucurbit androecy gene reveals how unisexual flowers develop and dioecy emerges. Science 350:688−691

doi: 10.1126/science.aac8370
[40]

Chen H, Sun J, Li S, Cui Q, Zhang H, et al. 2016. An ACC oxidase gene essential for cucumber carpel development. Molecular Plant 9:1315−1327

doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.06.018
[41]

Cebrián G, Iglesias-Moya J, Romero J, Martínez C, Garrido D, et al. 2022. The ethylene biosynthesis gene CpACO1A: a new player in the regulation of sex determination and female flower development in Cucurbita pepo. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:817922

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.817922
[42]

Gao Y, Lin Y, Liu X, García P, Liang Z. 2025. Identification of VvACO1 and transcriptional repressors VvASIL1/VvAG1 in ethylene biosynthesis of grape berries. Horticultural Plant Journal 11:1865−1878

doi: 10.1016/j.hpj.2025.07.003
[43]

Dong Z, Liu X, Guo X, Liu X, Wang B, et al. 2025. Developmental innovation of inferior ovaries and flower sex orchestrated by KNOX1 in cucurbits. Nature Plants 11: 861−877

doi: 10.1038/s41477-025-01950-w
[44]

Boualem A, Berthet S, Devani RS, Camps C, Fleurier S, et al. 2022. Ethylene plays a dual role in sex determination and fruit shape in cucurbits. Current Biology 32:2390−2401.e4

doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.04.031
[45]

Rashid D, Devani RS, Rodriguez-Granados NY, Abou-Choucha F, Troadec C, et al. 2023. Ethylene produced in carpel primordia controls CmHB40 expression to inhibit stamen development. Nature Plants 9:1675−1687

doi: 10.1038/s41477-023-01511-z
[46]

Graur D. 2016. Molecular and Genome Evolution. USA: Sinauer Associates. 612 pp. https://global.oup.com/academic/product/molecular-and-genome-evolution-9781605354699?cc=jp&lang=en&
[47]

Kimura M. 2007. Genetic variability maintained in a finite population due to mutational production of neutral and nearly neutral isoalleles. Genetical Research 89:341−363

doi: 10.1017/S0016672308009518
[48]

Nei M, Kumar S. 2000. Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. USA: Oxford University Press. 333 pp. doi: 10.1093/oso/9780195135848.001.0001
[49]

Wu Y, Li D, Hu Y, Li H, Ramstein GP, et al. 2023. Phylogenomic discovery of deleterious mutations facilitates hybrid potato breeding. Cell 186:2313−2328.e15

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.04.008
[50]

Niu X, Tang W, Liu Y, Mo B, Yu Y, et al. 2025. Prime editor-based high-throughput screening reveals functional synonymous mutations in human cells. Nature Biotechnology 1−13

doi: 10.1038/s41587-025-02710-z