Back Article

Schueler S, Kapeller S, Konrad H, Geburek T, Mengl M, et al. 2013. Adaptive genetic diversity of trees for forest conservation in a future climate: a case study on Norway spruce in Austria. Biodiversity and Conservation 22:1151−1166

Uckele KA, Vargas OM, Kay KM. 2024. Prezygotic barriers effectively limit hybridization in a rapid evolutionary radiation. New Phytologist 244:2548−2560

Khush GS, Brar DS. 2017. Alien introgression in rice. The Nucleus 60:251−261

Fedak G. 1999. Molecular aids for integration of alien chromatin through wide crosses. Genome 42:584−591

Prakash S, Bhat SR, Quiros CF, Kirti PB, Chopra VL. 2009. Brassica and its close allies: cytogenetics and evolution. In Plant Breeding Reviews, ed. Janick J. Vol. 31. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9780470593783.ch2

Grosser JW, Ollitrault P, Olivares-Fuster O. 2000. Somatic hybridization in citrus: an effective tool to facilitate variety improvementIn Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant 36:434−449

Ahmar S, Ballesta P, Ali M, Mora-Poblete F. 2021. Achievements and challenges of genomics-assisted breeding in forest trees: From marker-assisted selection to genome editing. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:10583

Flachowsky H, Hanke MV, Peil A, Strauss S, Fladung M. 2009. A review on transgenic approaches to accelerate breeding of woody plants. Plant Breeding 128:217−226

Kang X, Wei H. 2022. Breeding polyploid Populus: progress and perspective. Forestry Research 2:4

Dhooghe E, Van Laere K, Eeckhaut T, Leus L, Van Huylenbroeck J. 2011. Mitotic chromosome doubling of plant tissues in vitro. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 104:359−373

Lopez GA, Potts BM, Tilyard PA. 2000. F1 hybrid inviability in Eucalyptus: the case of E. ovata× E. globulus. Heredity 85:242−250

Karunarathne P, Zhou Q, Lascoux M, Milesi P. 2024. Hybridization mediated range expansion and climate change resilience in two keystone tree species of boreal forests. Global Change Biology 30:e17262

Sniezko RA, Koch J, Liu JJ, Romero-Severson J. 2023. Will genomic information facilitate forest tree breeding for disease and pest resistance? Forests 14:2382

Rieseberg LH, Blackman BK. 2010. Speciation genes in plants. Annals of botany 106:439−455

Baack E, Melo MC, Rieseberg LH, Ortiz-Barrientos D. 2015. The origins of reproductive isolation in plants. New Phytologist 207:968−984

Murray BG. 2017. Hybridization and plant breeding. In Encyclopedia of Applied Plant Sciences, eds. Thomas B, Murray BG, DJ. 2^nd Edition. Academic Press. pp. 168−173 doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394807-6.00191-X

Baek YS, Covey PA, Petersen JJ, Chetelat RT, McClure B, et al. 2015. Testing the SI× SC rule: pollen–pistil interactions in interspecific crosses between members of the tomato clade (Solanum section Lycopersicon, Solanaceae). American Journal of Botany 102:302−311

Bedinger PA, Broz AK, Tovar-Mendez A, McClure B. 2017. Pollen-pistil interactions and their role in mate selection. Plant Physiology 173:79−90

Broz AK, Randle AM, Sianta SA, Tovar-Méndez A, McClure B, et al. 2017. Mating system transitions in Solanum habrochaites impact interactions between populations and species. New Phytologist 213:440−454

Shi J, Shi J, Chen S, Zeng K, Sun M, et al. 2025. Self-incompatibility in monoecious Betula platyphylla involves S-RNase mechanisms. Plant Physiology 199(3):kiaf553

Koenig WD, Ashley MV. 2003. Is pollen limited? The answer is blowin'in the wind. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 18:157−159

Fenster CB, Armbruster WS, Wilson P, Dudash MR, Thomson JD. 2004. Pollination syndromes and floral specialization. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35:375−403

van der Niet T, Johnson SD. 2012. Phylogenetic evidence for pollinator-driven diversification of angiosperms. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 27:353−361

Ohigashi K, Mizuguti A, Yoshimura Y, Matsuo K, Miwa T. 2014. A new method for evaluating flowering synchrony to support the temporal isolation of genetically modified crops from their wild relatives. Journal of Plant Research 127:109−117

Salmela MJ, Cavers S, Cottrell JE, Iason GR, Ennos RA. 2013. Spring phenology shows genetic variation among and within populations in seedlings of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in the Scottish Highlands. Plant Ecology & Diversity 6:523−536

Anjos A, Jesus JG, Marques C, Borralho N, Valente C, et al. 2023. Exploring reproductive biology in Eucalyptus globulus clones under distinct climatic conditions. Discover Agriculture 1:6

Gerard PR, Fernandez-Manjarres JF, Frascaria-Lacoste N. 2006. Temporal cline in a hybrid zone population between Fraxinus excelsior L. and Fraxinus angustifolia Vahl. Molecular Ecology 15:3655−3667

de Oliveira Castro CA, dos Santos GA, Takahashi EK, Nunes ACP, de Souza GA, et al. 2022. Top grafting to accelerate self-pollination in Eucalyptus breeding. Revista Á rvore 46:e4630

Rajasekharan PE, Rohini MR. 2023. Pollen cryobanking—implications in genetic conservation and plant breeding. In Pollen Cryopreservation Protocols. New York, US: Springer. pp. 19−42 doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2843-0_2

Bramlett DL, Matthews FR. 1991. Storing loblolly pine pollen. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry 15:153−157

de Nettancourt D. 2001. Incompatibility and incongruity barriers between different species. In Incompatibility and incongruity in wild and cultivated plants. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 217−251 doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-04502-2_5

Liu C, Shen L, Xiao Y, Vyshedsky D, Peng C, et al. 2021. Pollen PCP-B peptides unlock a stigma peptide–receptor kinase gating mechanism for pollination. science 372:171−175

Lan Z, Song Z, Wang Z, Li L, Liu Y, et al. 2023. Antagonistic RALF peptides control an intergeneric hybridization barrier on Brassicaceae stigmas. Cell 186:4773−4787.e12

Zhong S, Lan Z, Qu LJ. 2025. Ingenious male–female communication ensures successful double fertilization in angiosperms. Annual Review of Plant Biology 76:401−431

Huang J, Yang L, Yang L, Wu X, Cui X, et al. 2023. Stigma receptors control intraspecies and interspecies barriers in Brassicaceae. Nature 614:303−308

Jakada BH, Wang S, Yang S, Wu Y, Huang Z, et al. 2024. FmRbohH mediates ROS generation and enhances pollen tube growth in Fraxinus mandshurica. Forests 15:1735

Cai M, Zeng K, Li L, Shi J, Jakada BH, et al. 2025. ROS homeostasis and cell wall biosynthesis pathway are involved in female inflorescence development of birch (Betula platyphylla). BMC Plant Biology 25:708

Franklin-Tong N. 2019. An SI-independent regulator. Nature Plants 5:650−651

Pandey KK. 1977. Mentor pollen: possible role of wall-held pollen growth promoting substances in overcoming intra-and interspecific incompatibility. Genetica 47:219−229

Knox R, Gaget M, Dumas C. 1987. Mentor pollen techniques. In International review of cytology. vol. 107. Amsterdam: Elsevier. pp. 315−332 doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61080-3

Stettler RF. 1968. Irradiated mentor pollen: its use in remote hybridization of black cottonwood. Nature 219:746−747

Sarla N. 1988. Overcoming interspecific incompatibility in the cross Brassica campestris ssp. japonica × Brassica oleracea var. botrytis using irradiated mentor pollenBiologia Plantarum 30:384−386

Cauvin B. 1988. Pistil treatments for improved fertility in hybridization of Eucalyptus gunnii (Hook). Proc. Sexual Reproduction in Higher Plants: Proceedings of the Tenth International Symposium on the Sexual Reproduction in Higher Plants, 30 May–4 June 1988, University of Siena, Siena, Italy. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 321−325 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-73271-3_51

Dhooghe E, Reheul D, Van Labeke M-C. 2021. Overcoming pre-fertilization barriers in intertribal crosses between Anemone coronaria L. and Ranunculus asiaticus L. Horticulturae 7:529

Zakharova EV, Khaliluev MR, Kovaleva LV. 2022. Hormonal signaling in the progamic phase of fertilization in plants. Horticulturae 8:365

Radović A, Nikolić D, Milatović D, Živković B, Stevanović N. 2016. The effect of plant hormones on pollen germination and pollen tube growth of almond cultivars. Acta Hortic 1139:375−380

Yang Q, Fu Y. 2020. Cut-style pollination can effectively overcome prefertilization barriers of distant hybridization in loquat. HortScience 55:287−293

Zenkteler M, Wojciechowicz M, Bagniewska-Zadworna A, Jezowski S. 2003. Preliminary results on studies of in vivo and in vitro sexual reproduction of Salix viminalis L. Dendrobiology 50:37−42

Deng YM, Ye XQ. 2012. The prefertilization reproductive barriers and overcoming methods of horticultural crops distant hybridization. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica 27:81−86

Wang C, Cheng H, Xu W, Xue J, Hua X, et al. 2023. Arabidopsis pollen-specific glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase-like genes are essential for pollen tube tip growth. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 65:2001−2017

Lan X, Yang J, Abhinandan K, Nie Y, Li X, et al. 2017. Flavonoids and ROS play opposing roles in mediating pollination in ornamental kale (Brassica oleracea var acephala). Molecular Plant 10:1361−1364

Sotola VA, Berg CS, Samuli M, Chen H, Mantel SJ, et al. 2023. Genomic mechanisms and consequences of diverse postzygotic barriers between monkeyflower species. Genetics 225:iyad156

Shaikh NY, Guan LM, Adachi T. 2002. Failure of fertilization associated with absence of zygote development in the interspecific cross of Fagopyrum tataricum × F. esculentum. Breeding science 52:9−13

Yoon JB, Yang DC, Park HG. 2005. Irregular meiosis and degenerated tapetum layer are the dual causes of hybrid sterility in interspecific hybridization between Capsicum annuum and C. baccatum. Horticulture Environment and Biotechnology 46:231−235

Sharma DR, Kaur R, Kumar K. 1996. Embryo rescue in plants—a review. Euphytica 89:325−337

Kouider M, Skirvin RM, Saladin KP, Dawson JO, Jokela JJ. 1984. A method to culture immature embryos of Populus deltoides in vitro. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 14:956−958

Nigar Q, Ul Hassan M, Rana RM, Ali I, Almoallim HS, et al. 2024. Optimization of embryo rescue technique for development of hybrid plants in stenospermic grapes. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 36:1−11

Pramanik K, Sahoo JP, Mohapatra PP, Acharya LK, Jena C. 2021. Insights into the embryo rescue — a modern in-vitro crop improvement approach in horticulture. Plant Cell Biotechnology and Molecular Biology 22:20−33

Zenkteler M, Nitzsche W. 1990. In vitro culture of wheat ovules. In Wheat. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 262−268 doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-10933-5_14

Mofidabadi AJ, Modir-Rahmati A, Tavesoli A. 1998. Application of ovary and ovule culture in Populus alba L. × P. euphratica OLIV hybridization. Silvae Genetica 47:332−334

Li J, Zhou J, Xu P, Yang Y, Deng X, et al. 2023. Improving bridge effect to overcome interspecific hybrid sterility by pyramiding hybrid sterile loci from Oryza glaberrima. Scientific Reports 13:23057

Appadurai R. 2023. Back crossing technique in interspecific hybridization in Gossypium. Madras Agricultural Journal 53:251−255

Mi J, Li G, Huang J, Yu H, Zhou F, et al. 2016. Stacking S5-n and f5-n to overcome sterility in indica-japonica hybrid rice. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 129:563−575

Stacy EA, Paritosh B, Johnson MA, Price DK. 2017. Incipient ecological speciation between successional varieties of a dominant tree involves intrinsic postzygotic isolating barriers. Ecology and Evolution 7:2501−2512

McBride CS, Singer MC. 2010. Field studies reveal strong postmating isolation between ecologically divergent butterfly populations. PLoS Biology 8:e1000529

Thompson KA, Urquhart-Cronish M, Whitney KD, Rieseberg LH, Schluter D. 2021. Patterns, predictors, and consequences of dominance in hybrids. The American Naturalist 197:E72−E88

Potts BM, Dungey HS. 2004. Interspecific hybridization of Eucalyptus: key issues for breeders and geneticists. New Forests 27:115−138

Walter GM, Richards TJ, Wilkinson MJ, Blows MW, Aguirre JD, et al. 2020. Loss of ecologically important genetic variation in late generation hybrids reveals links between adaptation and speciation. Evolution Letters 4:302−316

Goulet BE, Roda F, Hopkins R. 2017. Hybridization in plants: old ideas, new techniques. Plant Physiology 173:65−78

Liu S, Li X, Zhu J, Jin Y, Xia C, et al. 2024. Modern technologies provide new opportunities for somatic hybridization in the breeding of woody plants. Plants 13:2539

Janes JK, Hamilton JA. 2017. Mixing it up: the role of hybridization in forest management and conservation under climate change. Forests 8:237

Medina-Macedo L, Coelho A. 2011. QTL tools applied to forest breeding. BMC Proceedings 5:P47

Tonosaki K, Osabe K, Kawanabe T, Fujimoto R. 2016. The importance of reproductive barriers and the effect of allopolyploidization on crop breeding. Breeding Science 66:333−349

Dar TUH, Rehman RU. 2017. Origin of polyploidy. In Polyploidy: recent trends and future perspectives. New Delhi, India: Springer. pp. 15−29 doi: 10.1007/978-81-322-3772-3_2

Miri SM. 2020. Artificial polyploidy in the improvement of horticultural crops. Journal of Plant Physiology and Breeding 10:1−28

Tian H. 2003. Advances in in vitro fertilization study of higher plants. Journal of Plant Physiology and Molecular Biology 29:3−10 (in Chinese)

Molina-Rueda JJ, Tsai CJ, Kirby EG. 2013. The Populus superoxide dismutase gene family and its responses to drought stress in transgenic poplar overexpressing a pine cytosolic glutamine synthetase (GS1a). PLoS One 8:e56421

Kirby EG. 1982. The use of in vitro techniques for genetic modification of forest trees. In Tissue Culture in Forestry, eds. Bonga JM, Durzan DJ. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. pp. 369−386 doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-3538-4_12

Reddy CS, Ramireddy S, Reddy UK. 2024. Widening genetic diversity using embryo rescue in cucurbit crops: a review. Plants 13:1320

Baldursson S, Ahuja MR. 1996. Cytogenetics and potential of haploidy in forest tree genetics and improvement. In In Vitro Haploid Production in Higher Plants: Fundamental Aspects and Methods, eds. Jain SM, Sopory SK, Veilleux RE. Vol. 1. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. pp. 49−66 doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-1860-8_4

Kumari N, Gupta A, Pandey BC, Kushwaha R, Yaseen M. 2023. In vitro cultures: challenges and limitations. In Plants for Immunity and Conservation Strategies. Singapore: Springer. pp. 371−383 doi: 10.1007/978-981-99-2824-8_17

Jangid PP, Gharat PR, Kumar A. Regeneration in Woody Plants: Challenges and Opportunities. In Regeneration Potential in Plants. 1^st Edition. Boca Raton: CRC Press. pp. 98−113 doi: 10.1201/9781032702391

Zenkteler M, Wojciechowicz M, Bagniewska-Zadworna A, Zenkteler E, Jeżowski S. 2005. Intergeneric crossability studies on obtaining hybrids between Salix viminalis and four Populus species. Trees 19:638−643

Zenkteler E, Wojciechowicz MK, Zarychta Ł. 2016. Significance of stigma receptivity in intergeneric cross-pollination of Salix × Populus. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 00:85

Zhao K, Ma W, Jiao Y, Yang Y, Zhang Y, et al. 2021. Method for breaking through catalpa bungei distant hybridization incompatibility. Patent No. 112772408A

Whitecross MI, Willing RR. 1975. Hybridization of incompatible poplars following solvent treatment of stigmas. Experientia 31:651−653

Guries RP, Stettler RF. 1976. Pre-fertilization barriers to hybridization in the Poplars. Silvae Genetica 25(2):37−44

Willing RR, Pryor LD. 1976. Interspecific hybridisation in poplar. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 47:141−151

Bagniewska-Zadworna A, Zenkteler M, Zenkteler E, Wojciechowicz MK, Barakat A, et al. 2011. A successful application of the embryo rescue technique as a model for studying crosses between Salix viminalis and Populus species. Australian Journal of Botany 59:382−392

De Silva H. 2003. Cutting propagation of Leyland cypress (×Cupressocyparis leylandii). Combined Proceedings of the International Plant Propagators' Society 52:206−210

Olsen RT, Ranney TG, Viloria Z. 2006. Reproductive behavior of induced allotetraploid × Chitalpa and in vitro embryo culture of polyploid progeny. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 131:716−724

Olsen RT. 2007. Utilizing polyploidy for developing improved nursery crops: restoring fertility in wide hybrids, limiting fertility of invasive species, embryo culture of triploids, pest resistance, and inheritance of ornamental traits. Dissertation. North Carolina State University, North Carolina, USA. https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/handle/1840.16/5046

Ranney TG, Fantz PR. 2006. × Gordlinia grandiflora (Theaceae): an intergeneric hybrid between Franklinia alatamaha and Gordonia lasianthus. HortScience 41:1386−1388

Yamaguchi N, Shiraishi S, Sasaki Y, Yamamoto C. 2000. Molecular evidence of the hybrid origins of leyland cypress (× Cupressocyparis leylandii). Journal of Forest Research 5:35−38

Low C, McKenzie H, Shelbourne C, Gea L. 2005. Sawn timber and wood properties of 21-year-old Cupressus lusitanica, C. macrocarpa, and Chamaecyparis nootkatensis × C. macrocarpa hybrids. Part 1: sawn timber performance. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 35:91−113

Li J, Shoup S, Elias TS. 2006. Molecular confirmation of intergeneric hybrid × Chitalpa tashkentensis (Bignoniaceae). HortScience 41:1162−1164

Kuligowska K, Lütken H, Müller R. 2016. Towards development of new ornamental plants: status and progress in wide hybridization. Planta 244:1−17

Hazubska-Przybył T, Bojarczuk K. 2016. Tree somatic embryogenesis in science and forestry. Dendrobiology 76:105−116

Jain SM. 2006. An updated overview of advances in somatic embryogenesis in forest trees. In Plantation Technology in Tropical Forest Science, eds. Suzuki K, Ishii K, Sakurai S, Sasaki S. Tokyo: Springer. pp. 113−122 doi: 10.1007/4-431-28054-5_10

González-Arnao MT, Dolce N, González-Benito ME, Castillo Martínez CR, Cruz-Cruz CA. 2017. Approaches for in vitro conservation of woody plants germplasm. In Biodiversity and conservation of woody plants, eds. Ahuja M, Jain S. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 355−419 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-66426-2_13

Ahuja MR. 1991. Woody plant biotechnology: perspectives and limitations. In Woody Plant Biotechnology, ed. Ahuja MR. New York, US: Springer. pp. 1−10 doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7572-5_26

Grattapaglia D. 2013. Breeding forest trees by genomic selection: current progress and the way forward. In Genomics of plant genetic resources. Managing, sequencing and mining genetic resources. Vol. 1. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. pp. 651−682 doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-7572-5_26

Stettler RF. 1996. Biology of Populus and its implications for management and conservation. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: NRC Research Press (National Research Council of Canada). https://wildlandhydrology.com/resources/docs/Riparian%20Vegetation/Chapter_3_Biology_of_Populus_Book_1996.pdf

Stanton BJ, Haiby K, Gantz C, Espinoza J, Shuren RA. 2019. The economics of rapid multiplication of hybrid poplar biomass varieties. Forests 10:446

Lee DJ, Nikles DG, Dickinson GR. 2001. Prospects of eucalypt species, including interspecific hybrids from South Africa, for hardwood plantations in marginal subtropical environments in Queensland, Australia. Southern African Forestry Journal 2001:89−94

Warschefsky E, Penmetsa RV, Cook DR, Von Wettberg EJB. 2014. Back to the wilds: tapping evolutionary adaptations for resilient crops through systematic hybridization with crop wild relatives. American Journal of Botany 101:1791−1800

Smalley E, Guries R. 1993. Breeding elms for resistance to Dutch elm disease. Annual review of phytopathology 31:325−354

Tzvi T, Wang W, Arie A. 2000. Genetic transformation of Populus toward improving plant performance and drought tolerance: Populus transformation, development and drought tolerance. In Molecular Biology of Woody Plants. Volume 2. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. pp. 135−160 doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-2313-8_7

Goessen R, Isabel N, Wehenkel C, Pavy N, Tischenko L, et al. 2022. Coping with environmental constraints: geographically divergent adaptive evolution and germination plasticity in the transcontinental Populus tremuloides. Plants, People, Planet 4:638−654

Stanton B, Eaton J, Johnson J, Rice D, Schuette B, et al. 2002. Hybrid poplar in the Pacific Northwest: the effects of market-driven management. Journal of Forestry 100:28−33

Hinchee M, Rottmann W, Mullinax L, Zhang C, Chang S, et al. 2010. Short-rotation woody crops for bioenergy and biofuels applications. In Biofuels: Global impact on renewable energy, production agriculture, and technological advancements. New York, US: Springer. pp. 139−156 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7145-6_8

Niu S, Ding J, Xu C, Wang J. 2023. Modern and future forestry based on biotechnology. Modern Agriculture 1:27−33

Lexer C, Heinze B, Alia R, Rieseberg LH. 2004. Hybrid zones as a tool for identifying adaptive genetic variation in outbreeding forest trees: lessons from wild annual sunflowers (Helianthus spp.). Forest Ecology and Management 197:49−64

Alves FC, Balmant KM, Resende Jr MFR, Kirst M, de Los Campos G. 2020. Accelerating forest tree breeding by integrating genomic selection and greenhouse phenotyping. The Plant Genome 13:e20048

Ray D, Berlin M, Alia R, Sanchez L, Hynynen J, et al. 2022. Transformative changes in tree breeding for resilient forest restoration. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 5:1005761

Fan D, Liu T, Li C, Jiao B, Li S, et al. 2015. Efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated targeted mutagenesis in Populus in the first generation. Scientific Reports 5:12217