[1]

Bihani SC, Tarushi, Srivastava AK. 2025. Decoding the calcium signal: structural insights into CBL-CIPK pathway in plants. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) − General Subjects 1869:130819

doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2025.130819
[2]

Ma X, Li QH, Yu YN, Qiao YM, Haq SU, et al. 2020. The CBL-CIPK pathway in plant response to stress signals. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21:5668

doi: 10.3390/ijms21165668
[3]

Kaya C, Uğurlar F, Adamakis IS. 2024. Molecular mechanisms of CBL-CIPK signaling pathway in plant abiotic stress tolerance and hormone crosstalk. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25:5043

doi: 10.3390/ijms25095043
[4]

Plasencia FA, Estrada Y, Flores FB, Ortíz-Atienza A, Lozano R, et al. 2021. The Ca2+ sensor calcineurin B-like protein 10 in plants: emerging new crucial roles for plant abiotic stress tolerance. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:599944

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.599944
[5]

Dong Q, Bai B, Almutairi BO, Kudla J. 2021. Emerging roles of the CBL-CIPK calcium signaling network as key regulatory hub in plant nutrition. Journal of Plant Physiology 257:153335

doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2020.153335
[6]

Gong Z, Xiong L, Shi H, Yang S, Herrera-Estrella LR, et al. 2020. Plant abiotic stress response and nutrient use efficiency. Science China Life Sciences 63:635−674

doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1683-x
[7]

Poddar N, Deepika D, Chitkara P, Singh A, Kumar S. 2022. Molecular and expression analysis indicate the role of CBL interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) in abiotic stress signaling and development in chickpea. Scientific Reports 12:16862

doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-20750-2
[8]

Chen Y, Jin YF, Wang Y, Gao Y, Wang Q, et al. 2022. Diverse roles of the CIPK gene family in transcription regulation and various biotic and abiotic stresses: a literature review and bibliometric study. Frontiers in Genetics 13:1041078

doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.1041078
[9]

Wang C, Huang Q, Gu J, Cai M, Lei Z, et al. 2026. Genome-wide identification of the CIPK family in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) and functional analysis of HaCIPK18 in salt tolerance. Plant Science 362:112846

doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2025.112846
[10]

Zhou Y, Zhu Y, Li W, Zhang T, Li Y, et al. 2023. Heterologous expression of Sesuvium portulacastrum SOS-related genes confer salt tolerance in yeast. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 45(4):58

doi: 10.1007/s11738-023-03518-7
[11]

Hu DG, Ma QJ, Sun CH, Sun MH, You CX, et al. 2016. Overexpression of MdSOS2L1, a CIPK protein kinase, increases the antioxidant metabolites to enhance salt tolerance in apple and tomato. Physiologia Plantarum 156:201−214

doi: 10.1111/ppl.12354
[12]

Tansley C, Houghton J, Rose AME, Witek B, Payet RD, et al. 2023. CIPK-B is essential for salt stress signalling in Marchantia polymorpha. New Phytologist 237:2210−2223

doi: 10.1111/nph.18633
[13]

Wang M, Yang S, Sun L, Feng Z, Gao Y, et al. 2022. A CBL4-CIPK6 module confers salt tolerance in cucumber. Vegetable Research 2:7

doi: 10.48130/vr-2022-0007
[14]

Imtiaz K, Ahmed M, Annum N, Tester M, Saeed NA. 2023. AtCIPK16, a CBL-interacting protein kinase gene, confers salinity tolerance in transgenic wheat. Frontiers in Plant Science 14:1127311

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1127311
[15]

Jakada BH, Zhu F, Waqas K, Chen H, Guan Q, et al. 2025. The CBL-interacting protein kinase 9 (OsCIPK9) contributes to saline-alkali stress tolerance in rice. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 229:110332

doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.110332
[16]

Lu L, Chen X, Wang P, Lu Y, Zhang J, et al. 2021. CIPK11: a calcineurin B-like protein-interacting protein kinase from Nitraria tangutorum, confers tolerance to salt and drought in Arabidopsis. BMC Plant Biology 21:123

doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-02878-x
[17]

Hu W, Xia Z, Yan Y, Ding Z, Tie W, et al. Genome-wide gene phylogeny of CIPK family in cassava and expression analysis of partial drought-induced genes. Frontiers in Plant Science 6:914

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00914
[18]

Sanyal SK, Sharma K, Bisht D, Sharma S, Sushmita K, et al. 2023. Role of calcium sensor protein module CBL-CIPK in abiotic stress and light signaling responses in green algae. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 237:124163

doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.124163
[19]

You Z, Guo S, Li Q, Fang Y, Huang P, et al. 2023. The CBL1/9-CIPK1 calcium sensor negatively regulates drought stress by phosphorylating the PYLs ABA receptor. Nature Communications 14:5886

doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-41657-0
[20]

Zhu X, Wang B, Wang X, Wei X. 2022. Identification of the CIPK-CBL family gene and functional characterization of CqCIPK14 gene under drought stress in quinoa. BMC Genomics 23:447

doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08683-6
[21]

Lu S, Chen Y, Wang S, Han B, Zhao C, et al. 2023. Combined metabolomic and transcriptomic analysis reveals key components of OsCIPK17 overexpression improves drought tolerance in rice. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:1043757

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1043757
[22]

Ma X, Yu YN, Li Y, Gong ZH. 2023. The CBL-interacting protein kinase CaCIPK7 enhances drought resistance in pepper. Scientia Horticulturae 310:111726

doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111726
[23]

Hosseini Pouya HS, Cheniany M, Heidari, P. 2025. Decoding the CBL gene family in durum wheat: insights into dual ABA signaling pathways and calcium-mediated drought tolerance. The Plant Genome 18:e70062

doi: 10.1002/tpg2.70062
[24]

Shi J, Kim KN, Ritz O, Albrecht V, Gupta R, et al. 1999. Novel protein kinases associated with calcineurin B-like calcium sensors in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 11:2393−2405

doi: 10.2307/3870963
[25]

Xiang Y, Huang Y, Xiong L. 2007. Characterization of stress-responsive CIPK genes in rice for stress tolerance improvement. Plant Physiology 144:1416−1428

doi: 10.1104/pp.107.101295
[26]

Wang Q, Zhao K, Gong Y, Yang Y, Yue Y. 2022. Genome-wide identification and functional analysis of the calcineurin B-like protein and calcineurin B-like Protein-interacting protein kinase gene families in Chinese cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp. pekinensis). Genes 13:795

doi: 10.3390/genes13050795
[27]

Cui Y, Su Y, Wang J, Jia B, Wu M, et al. 2020. Genome-wide characterization and analysis of CIPK gene family in two cultivated allopolyploid cotton species: sequence variation, association with Seed oil content, and the role of GhCIPK6. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21:863

doi: 10.3390/ijms21030863
[28]

Xi Y, Liu J, Dong C, Cheng ZM. 2017. The CBL and CIPK gene family in grapevine (Vitis vinifera): genome-wide analysis and expression profiles in response to various abiotic stresses. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:978

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00978
[29]

Zhang Y, Zhou XN, Liu S, Yu A, Yang C, et al. 2020. Identification and functional analysis of tomato CIPK gene family. International Journal of Molecular Science 21:110

doi: 10.3390/ijms21010110
[30]

Ma R, Liu W, Li S, Zhu X, Yang J, et al. 2021. Genome-wide identification, characterization and expression analysis of the CIPK gene family in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and the role of StCIPK10 in response to drought and osmotic stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:13535

doi: 10.3390/ijms222413535
[31]

Ma X, Gai WX, Qiao YM, Ali M, Wei AM, et al. 2019. Identification of CBL and CIPK gene families and functional characterization of CaCIPK1 under Phytophthora capsici in pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). BMC Genomics 20:775

doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6125-z
[32]

Yin X, Wang Q, Chen Q, Xiang N, Yang Y, et al. 2017. Genome-wide identification and functional analysis of the calcineurin B-like protein and calcineurin B-like protein-interacting protein kinase gene families in turnip (Brassica rapa var. rapa). Frontiers in Plant Science 8:1191

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01191
[33]

Zhu K, Fan P, Liu H, Tan P, Ma W, et al. 2022. Insight into the CBL and CIPK gene families in pecan (Carya illinoinensis): identification, evolution and expression patterns in drought response. BMC Plant Biology 22:221

doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03601-0
[34]

Narwal P, Singh RK, Pathak AK, Kumar D, Negi NP. 2024. Genome-wide profiling of CBL interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) in banana unveils their role in abiotic stress signaling and stress tolerance enhancement. Plant Stress 11:100417

doi: 10.1016/j.stress.2024.100417
[35]

Alemu TT, Oanh VTK. 2025. Implications of developmental levels and packaging materials on the quality of iceberg lettuce for marketing system: a review. International Journal of Food Science 2025:5548305

doi: 10.1155/ijfo/5548305
[36]

Abdelkader M, Suliman AA, Salem SS, Assiya A, Voronina L, et al. 2024. Studying the combined impact of salinity and drought stress-simulated conditions on physio-biochemical characteristics of lettuce plant. Horticulturae 10:1186

doi: 10.3390/horticulturae10111186
[37]

Reyes-Chin-Wo S, Wang Z, Yang X, Kozik A, Arikit S, et al. 2017. Genome assembly with in vitro proximity ligation data and whole-genome triplication in lettuce. Nature Communications 8:14953

doi: 10.1038/ncomms14953
[38]

Cao S, Sawettalake N, Shen L. 2024. Gapless genome assembly and epigenetic profiles reveal gene regulation of whole-genome triplication in lettuce. GigaScience 13:giae043

doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giae043
[39]

Wang K, Jin J, Wang J, Wang X, Sun J, et al. 2024. The complete telomere-to-telomere genome assembly of lettuce. Plant Communications 5:101011

doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2024.101011
[40]

Zhang B, Xue Y, Liu X, Ding H, Yang Y, et al. 2024. A near-complete chromosome-level genome assembly of looseleaf lettuce (Lactuca sativa var. crispa). Scientific Data 11:961

doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03830-y
[41]

van Workum DM, Mehrem SL, Snoek BL, Alderkamp MC, Lapin D, et al. 2024. Lactuca super-pangenome reduces bias towards reference genes in lettuce research. BMC Plant Biology 24:1019

doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05712-2
[42]

Finn RD, Clements J, Eddy SR. 2011. HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Research 39:W29−W37

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr367
[43]

Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33:1870−1874

doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054
[44]

Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, et al. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Research 37:W202−W208

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp335
[45]

Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Frank MH, et al. 2020. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Molecular Plant 13:1194−1202

doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009
[46]

Gasteiger E, Gattiker A, Hoogland C, Ivanyi I, Appel RD, et al. 2003. ExPASy: the proteomics server for in-depth protein knowledge and analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 31:3784−3788

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg563
[47]

Lescot M, Déhais P, Thijs G, Marchal K, Moreau Y, et al. 2002. PlantCARE, a database of plant cis-acting regulatory elements and a portal to tools for in silico analysis of promoter sequences. Nucleic Acids Research 30:325−327

doi: 10.1093/nar/30.1.325
[48]

Wang Y, Li J, Paterson AH. 2013. MCScanX-transposed: detecting transposed gene duplications based on multiple colinearity scans. Bioinformatics 29:1458−1460

doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt150
[49]

Schmittgen TD, Livak KJ. 2008. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method. Nature Protocols 3:1101−1108

doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.73
[50]

Chen JS, Wang ST, Mei Q, Sun T, Hu JT, et al. The role of CBL-CIPK signaling in plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. Plant Molecular Biology 114:53

doi: 10.1007/s11103-024-01417-0