[1]

Parvez MA, Ahmad Rana I, Nawaz A, Arshad HSH. 2023. The impact of brick kilns on environment and society: a bibliometric and thematic review. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30:48628−48653

doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-26011-7
[2]

Hamid A, Riaz A, Noor F, Mazhar I. 2023. Assessment and mapping of total suspended particulate and soil quality around brick kilns and occupational health issues among brick kilns workers in Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30:3335−3350

doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22428-8
[3]

Chen Y, Du W, Zhuo S, Liu W, Liu Y, et al. 2017. Stack and fugitive emissions of major air pollutants from typical brick kilns in China. Environmental Pollution 224:421−429

doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.02.022
[4]

Khan MW, Ali Y, De Felice F, Salman A, Petrillo A. 2019. Impact of brick kilns industry on environment and human health in Pakistan. Science of The Total Environment 678:383−389

doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.369
[5]

Abd Elnabi MK, Elkaliny NE, Elyazied MM, Azab SH, Elkhalifa SA, et al. 2023. Toxicity of heavy metals and recent advances in their removal: a review. Toxics 11:580

doi: 10.3390/toxics11070580
[6]

Nivetha N, Srivarshine B, Sowmya B, Rajendiran M, Saravanan P, et al. 2023. A comprehensive review on bio-stimulation and bio-enhancement towards remediation of heavy metals degeneration. Chemosphere 312:137099

doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137099
[7]

Amin F, Abbas S, Abbass W, Salmi A, Ahmed A, et al. 2022. Potential use of wastewater treatment plant sludge in fabrication of burnt clay bricks. Sustainability 14:6711

doi: 10.3390/su14116711
[8]

Baqar M, Saleem R, Zhao M, Zhao L, Cheng Z, et al. 2024. Combustion of high-calorific industrial waste in conventional brick kilns: an emerging source of PFAS emissions to agricultural soils. Science of The Total Environment 906:167612

doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167612
[9]

Brooks N, Biswas D, Hossin R, Yu A, Saha S, et al. 2023. Health consequences of small-scale industrial pollution: evidence from the brick sector in Bangladesh. World Development 170:106318

doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106318
[10]

Li X, Meng D, Li J, Yin H, Liu H, et al. 2017. Response of soil microbial communities and microbial interactions to long-term heavy metal contamination. Environmental Pollution 231:908−917

doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2017.08.057
[11]

Tosini L, Cartereau M, Le Bagousse-Pinguet Y, Laffont-Schwob I, Prudent P, et al. 2023. Plant biodiversity offsets negative effects of metals and metalloids soil multi-contamination on ecosystem multifunctionality. Science of The Total Environment 898:165567

doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165567
[12]

Yao K, Cai A, Han J, Che R, Hao J, et al. 2023. The characteristics and metabolic potentials of the soil bacterial community of two typical military demolition ranges in China. Science of The Total Environment 874:162562

doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162562
[13]

Yin Y, Wang X, Hu Y, Li F, Cheng H. 2023. Soil bacterial community structure in the habitats with different levels of heavy metal pollution at an abandoned polymetallic mine. Journal of Hazardous Materials 442:130063

doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.130063
[14]

Zhu J, Huang Q, Peng X, Zhou X, Gao S, et al. 2022. MRG chip: a high-throughput qPCR-based tool for assessment of the heavy metal(loid) resistome. Environmental Science & Technology 56:10656−10667

doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c00488
[15]

Chen SC, Sun GX, Yan Y, Konstantinidis KT, Zhang SY, et al. 2020. The Great Oxidation Event expanded the genetic repertoire of arsenic metabolism and cycling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117:10414−10421

doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001063117
[16]

Liu Y, Dai W, Yao D, Wang N, Liu M, et al. 2023. Arsenic pollution from human activities drives changes in soil microbial community characteristics. Environmental Microbiology 25:2592−2603

doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.16442
[17]

Zhang LZ, Xing SP, Huang FY, Xiu W, Rensing C, et al. 2024. Metabolic coupling of arsenic, carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur in high arsenic geothermal groundwater: evidence from molecular mechanisms to community ecology. Water Research 249:120953

doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2023.120953
[18]

Li Z, Feng C, Lei J, He X, Wang Q, et al. 2024. Farmland microhabitat mediated by a residual microplastic film: microbial communities and function. Environmental Science & Technology 58:3654−3664

doi: 10.1021/acs.est.3c07717
[19]

Ma Q, Li Q, Wang J, Parales RE, Li L, et al. 2023. Exposure to three herbicide mixtures influenced maize root-associated microbial community structure, function and the network complexity. Environmental Pollution 336:122393

doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122393
[20]

Ke W, Li C, Zhu F, Luo X, Feng J, et al. 2023. Effect of potentially toxic elements on soil multifunctionality at a lead smelting site. Journal of Hazardous Materials 454:131525

doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131525
[21]

Huang K, Yang Y, Lu H, Hu S, Chen G, et al. 2023. Transformation kinetics of exogenous nickel in a paddy soil during anoxic-oxic alteration: roles of organic matter and iron oxides. Journal of Hazardous Materials 452:131246

doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131246
[22]

Zhang D, Cheng H, Hao B, Li Q, Wu J, et al. 2021. Fresh chicken manure fumigation reduces the inhibition time of chloropicrin on soil bacteria and fungi and increases beneficial microorganisms. Environmental Pollution 286:117460

doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.117460
[23]

Yan J, Wang L, Xing C, Ma S, Xu J, et al. 2023. Graphitic carbon nitride alleviates cadmium toxicity to microbial communities in soybean rhizosphere. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30:94988−95001

doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-29040-4
[24]

Dai T, Wen D, Bates CT, Wu L, Guo X, et al. 2022. Nutrient supply controls the linkage between species abundance and ecological interactions in marine bacterial communities. Nature Communications 13:175

doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27857-6
[25]

Zhang K, Shi Y, Cui X, Yue P, Li K, et al. 2019. Salinity is a key determinant for soil microbial communities in a desert ecosystem. mSystems 4:e00225-18

doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00225-18
[26]

Lima J, Manning T, Rutherford KM, Baima ET, Dewhurst RJ, et al. 2021. Taxonomic annotation of 16S rRNA sequences of pig intestinal samples using MG-RAST and QIIME2 generated different microbiota compositions. Journal of Microbiological Methods 186:106235

doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106235
[27]

Huang D, Yu P, Ye M, Schwarz C, Jiang X, et al. 2021. Enhanced mutualistic symbiosis between soil phages and bacteria with elevated chromium-induced environmental stress. Microbiome 9:150

doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01074-1
[28]

Toole DR, Zhao J, Martens-Habbena W, Strauss SL. 2021. Bacterial functional prediction tools detect but underestimate metabolic diversity compared to shotgun metagenomics in southwest Florida soils. Applied Soil Ecology 168:104129

doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104129
[29]

Xia R, Shi Y, Wang X, Wu Y, Sun M, et al. 2022. Metagenomic sequencing reveals that the assembly of functional genes and taxa varied highly and lacked redundancy in the earthworm gut compared with soil under vanadium stress. mSystems 7:e01253-21

doi: 10.1128/mSystems.01253-21
[30]

Ren W, Penttilä R, Kasanen R, Asiegbu FO. 2023. Interkingdom and intrakingdom interactions in the microbiome of Heterobasidion fruiting body and associated decayed woody tissues. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 89:e01406-23

doi: 10.1128/aem.01406-23
[31]

Bai X, Li Y, Jing X, Zhao X, Zhao P. 2023. Response mechanisms of bacterial communities and nitrogen cycle functional genes in millet rhizosphere soil to chromium stress. Frontiers in Microbiology 14:1116535

doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1116535
[32]

Halter D, Cordi A, Gribaldo S, Gallien S, Goulhen-Chollet F, et al. 2011. Taxonomic and functional prokaryote diversity in mildly arsenic-contaminated sediments. Research in Microbiology 162:877−887

doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2011.06.001
[33]

Xu R, Sun X, Häggblom MM, Dong Y, Zhang M, et al. 2022. Metabolic potentials of members of the class Acidobacteriia in metal-contaminated soils revealed by metagenomic analysis. Environmental Microbiology 24:803−818

doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15612
[34]

Wu B, Luo H, Wang X, Liu H, Peng H, et al. 2022. Effects of environmental factors on soil bacterial community structure and diversity in different contaminated districts of Southwest China mine tailings. Science of The Total Environment 802:149899

doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149899
[35]

Hu M, Sun W, Krumins V, Li F. 2019. Arsenic contamination influences microbial community structure and putative arsenic metabolism gene abundance in iron plaque on paddy rice root. Science of The Total Environment 649:405−412

doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.388
[36]

Ma B, Wang H, Dsouza M, Lou J, He Y, et al. 2016. Geographic patterns of co-occurrence network topological features for soil microbiota at continental scale in eastern China. The ISME Journal 10:1891−1901

doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.261
[37]

Tu Q, Yan Q, Deng Y, Michaletz ST, Buzzard V, et al. 2020. Biogeographic patterns of microbial co-occurrence ecological networks in six American forests. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 148:107897

doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2020.107897
[38]

Wan D, Liu FF, Chen JB, Kappler A, Kuzyakov Y, et al. 2022. Microbial community mediates hydroxyl radical production in soil slurries by iron redox transformation. Water Research 220:118689

doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2022.118689
[39]

Yang L, Barnard R, Kuzyakov Y, Tian J. 2021. Bacterial communities drive the resistance of soil multifunctionality to land-use change in karst soils. European Journal of Soil Biology 104:103313

doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2021.103313
[40]

Liu Y, Wang F, Wang Z, Xiang L, Fu Y, et al. 2024. Soil properties and organochlorine compounds co-shape the microbial community structure: a case study of an obsolete site. Environmental Research 240:117589

doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2023.117589
[41]

Zeb A, Liu W, Ali N, Shi R, Wang Q, et al. 2024. Microplastic pollution in terrestrial ecosystems: global implications and sustainable solutions. Journal of Hazardous Materials 461:132636

doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.132636
[42]

Kumar S, Zhao M, Zhang H, Rahman MA, Luo C, et al. 2021. Distribution, contamination status and source of trace elements in the soil around brick kilns. Chemosphere 263:127882

doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127882
[43]

Khalid M, Liu X, Ur Rahman S, Rehman A, Zhao C, et al. 2023. Responses of microbial communities in rhizocompartments of king grass to phytoremediation of cadmium-contaminated soil. Science of The Total Environment 904:167226

doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167226
[44]

Fan Y, Wang H, Sun C, Wang Y, Jin C, et al. 2023. Metagenomic and transcriptome elucidating the sulfamethoxazole degradation and metabolism pathways in fermentative bacteria and microalgae coupling system for mariculture wastewater treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal 474:145560

doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.145560
[45]

Castro-Severyn J, Pardo-Esté C, Sulbaran Y, Cabezas C, Gariazzo V, et al. 2019. Arsenic response of three altiplanic exiguobacterium strains with different tolerance levels against the metalloid species: a proteomics study. Frontiers in Microbiology 10:2161

doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02161
[46]

Li Y, Zhang M, Xu R, Lin H, Sun X, et al. 2021. Arsenic and antimony co-contamination influences on soil microbial community composition and functions: relevance to arsenic resistance and carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur cycling. Environment International 153:106522

doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106522
[47]

Ma S, Qiao L, Liu X, Zhang S, Zhang L, et al. 2022. Microbial community succession in soils under long-term heavy metal stress from community diversity-structure to KEGG function pathways. Environmental Research 214:113822

doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113822
[48]

He Z, Shen J, Li Q, Yang Y, Zhang D, et al. 2023. Bacterial metal(loid) resistance genes (MRGs) and their variation and application in environment: a review. Science of The Total Environment 871:162148

doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162148