| [1] |
Wang X, Sun M, Xiong Y, Liu X, Li C, et al. 2024. Restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (RAD-seq) of tea plant (Camellia sinensis) in Sichuan province, China, provides insights into free amino acid and polyphenol contents of tea. |
| [2] |
Xiao Z, Huang X, Zang Z, Yang H. 2018. Spatio-temporal variation and the driving forces of tea production in China over the last 30 years. |
| [3] |
Zhang T, Liu X, Tang X, Zeng X, Wang Y, et al. 2021. Analysis of fertilization status and measures in tea plantations in Sichuan. Sichuan Agricultural Science and Technology 2021:39−40 (in Chinese) |
| [4] |
Afshar M, Mofatteh S. 2024. Biochar for a sustainable future: environmentally friendly production and diverse applications. |
| [5] |
Tomczyk A, Sokołowska Z, Boguta P. 2020. Biochar physicochemical properties: pyrolysis temperature and feedstock kind effects. |
| [6] |
Singh Yadav SP, Bhandari S, Bhatta D, Poudel A, Bhattarai S, et al. 2023. Biochar application: a sustainable approach to improve soil health. |
| [7] |
Schmidt MWI, Noack AG. 2000. Black carbon in soils and sediments: analysis, distribution, implications, and current challenges. |
| [8] |
Thies JE, Rillig MC. 2009. Characteristics of biochar: biological properties. In Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology, eds. Lehmann J, Joseph S. London: Routledge. pp. 85−105 doi: 10.4324/9781849770552 |
| [9] |
Dai Z, Zhang X, Tang C, Muhammad N, Wu J, et al. 2017. Potential role of biochars in decreasing soil acidification − a critical review. |
| [10] |
Oo AZ, Sudo S, Akiyama H, Win KT, Shibata A, et al. 2018. Effect of dolomite and biochar addition on N2O and CO2 emissions from acidic tea field soil. |
| [11] |
Zou Z, Mi W, Li X, Hu Q, Zhang L, et al. 2023. Biochar application method influences root growth of tea (Camellia sinensis L.) by altering soil biochemical properties. |
| [12] |
Chen P, Liu Y, Mo C, Jiang Z, Yang J, et al. 2021. Microbial mechanism of biochar addition on nitrogen leaching and retention in tea soils from different plantation ages. |
| [13] |
Wang Z, Liu S, Ruan Y, Wang Q, Zhang Z. 2023. Comparison of biochar- and lime-adjusted pH changes in N2O emissions and associated microbial communities in a tropical tea plantation soil. |
| [14] |
Luo Y, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Sun Y, Xia X, et al. 2023. Combined application of biochar and pruned tea plant litter benefits nitrogen availability for tea and alters microbial community structure. |
| [15] |
Wang Y, Huang J, Ye J, Li Y, Lin Y, et al. 2021. Effects of biochar application on soil properties and fungi community structure in acidified tea gardens. |
| [16] |
Yang W, Li C, Wang S, Zhou B, Mao Y, et al. 2021. Influence of biochar and biochar-based fertilizer on yield, quality of tea and microbial community in an acid tea orchard soil. |
| [17] |
Wang F, Chen Y, Wu Z, Jiang F, Yu W, et al. 2021. Effects of reduced chemical fertilizer applications on fungal community and functional groups in tea plantation soil. Acta Tea Sinica 62:170−178 (in Chinese) |
| [18] |
Kuang C, Jiang C, Li Z, Hu F. 2012. Effects of biochar amendments on soil organic carbon mineralization and microbial biomass in red paddy soils. |
| [19] |
Trasar-Cepeda C, Camiña F, Leirós MC, Gil-Sotres F. 1999. An improved method to measure catalase activity in soils. |
| [20] |
Bremner JM. 1960. Determination of nitrogen in soil by the Kjeldahl method. |
| [21] |
Chen B, Yang H, Song W, Liu C, Xu J, et al. 2016. Effect of N fertilization rate on soil alkali-hydrolyzable N, subtending leaf N concentration, fiber yield, and quality of cotton. |
| [22] |
Mehlich A. 1984. Mehlich 3 soil test extractant: a modification of Mehlich 2 extractant. |
| [23] |
Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. 2007. Naïve bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. |
| [24] |
Douglas GM, Maffei VJ, Zaneveld JR, Yurgel SN, Brown JR, et al. 2020. PICRUSt2 for prediction of metagenome functions. |
| [25] |
Chen C, Wu Y, Li J, Wang X, Zeng Z, et al. 2023. TBtools-II: a 'one for all, all for one' bioinformatics platform for biological big-data mining. Molecular Plant 16:1733−1742 |
| [26] |
Stpniewska Z, Wolińska A, Ziomek J. 2009. Response of soil catalase activity to chromium contamination. |
| [27] |
Wang H, Wu J, Li G, Yan L. 2020. Changes in soil carbon fractions and enzyme activities under different vegetation types of the northern Loess Plateau. |
| [28] |
Pettit NM, Smith ARJ, Freedman RB, Burns RG. 1976. Soil urease: Activity, stability and kinetic properties. |
| [29] |
Lin H, Das Peddada S. 2020. Analysis of microbial compositions: a review of normalization and differential abundance analysis. |
| [30] |
Yang X, Hou R, Fu Q, Li T, Li M, et al. 2024. A critical review of biochar as an environmental functional material in soil ecosystems for migration and transformation mechanisms and ecological risk assessment. |
| [31] |
Kuryntseva P, Karamova K, Galitskaya P, Selivanovskaya S, Evtugyn G. 2023. Biochar functions in soil depending on feedstock and pyrolyzation properties with particular emphasis on biological properties. |
| [32] |
Yan P, Shen C, Zou Z, Fu J, Li X, et al. 2021. Biochar stimulates tea growth by improving nutrients in acidic soil. |
| [33] |
Wang H, Hu T, Wang M, Liang Y, Shen C, et al. 2023. Biochar addition to tea garden soils: effects on tea fluoride uptake and accumulation. |
| [34] |
Chu L, Darshika Hennayake HMK, Darshika H, Sun H. 2019. Biochar effectively reduces ammonia volatilization from nitrogen-applied soils in tea and bamboo plantations. |
| [35] |
Bolan N, Sarmah AK, Bordoloi S, Bolan S, Padhye LP, et al. 2023. Soil acidification and the liming potential of biochar. |
| [36] |
Shi RY, Li JY, Ni N, Xu RK. 2019. Understanding the biochar's role in ameliorating soil acidity. |
| [37] |
Ighalo JO, Conradie J, Ohoro CR, Amaku JF, Oyedotun KO, et al. 2023. Biochar from coconut residues: an overview of production, properties, and applications. |
| [38] |
Guo S, Kumar Awasthi M, Wang Y, Xu P. 2021. Current understanding in conversion and application of tea waste biomass: a review. |
| [39] |
Tiwari R, Dwivedi BS, Sharma YM, Sharma A, Dwivedi AK. 2019. Activities of β-glucosidase, phosphatase and dehydrogenase as soil quality indicators: a review. |
| [40] |
Liu M, Gan B, Li Q, Xiao W, Song X. 2022. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus addition on soil extracellular enzyme activity and stoichiometry in Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) forests. |
| [41] |
Chen X, Geng Z, Wang S, Zhao H. 2014. Effects of biochar amendment on microbial biomass and enzyme activities in loess soil. Journal of Agro-Environment Science 33(4):751−758 |
| [42] |
Liu J, Li X, Zhu Q, Zhou J, Shi L, et al. 2024. Differences in the activities of six soil enzymes in response to cadmium contamination of paddy soils in high geological background areas. |
| [43] |
Jiao XG, Gao CS, Lü GH, Sui YY. 2011. Effect of long-term fertilization on soil enzyme activities under different hydrothermal conditions in Northeast China. |
| [44] |
Li YC, Li Z, Li ZW, Jiang YH, Weng BQ, et al. 2016. Variations of rhizosphere bacterial communities in tea (Camellia sinensis L.) continuous cropping soil by high-throughput pyrosequencing approach. |
| [45] |
Madiba OF, Solaiman ZM, Carson JK, Murphy DV. 2016. Biochar increases availability and uptake of phosphorus to wheat under leaching conditions. |
| [46] |
Alvarez-Campos O, Lang TA, Bhadha JH, McCray JM, Glaz B, et al. 2018. Biochar and mill ash improve yields of sugarcane on a sand soil in Florida. |
| [47] |
Wang S, Li T, Zheng Z. 2018. Response of soil aggregate-associated microbial and nematode communities to tea plantation age. |
| [48] |
Han Z, Xu P, Li Z, Lin H, Zhu C, et al. 2022. Microbial diversity and the abundance of keystone species drive the response of soil multifunctionality to organic substitution and biochar amendment in a tea plantation. |
| [49] |
Feng H, Xu C, He H, Zeng Q, Chen N, et al. 2021. Effects of biochar on soil enzyme activity & the bacterial community and its mechanism. |
| [50] |
Wang H, Wu Y, Liu J, Xue J. 2022. A review of research advances in the effects of biochar on soil nitrogen cycling and its functional microorganisms. |
| [51] |
Mujakić I, Piwosz K, Koblížek M. 2022. Phylum gemmatimonadota and its role in the environment. |
| [52] |
Xu W, Xu H, Delgado-Baquerizo M, Gundale MJ, Zou X, et al. 2023. Global meta-analysis reveals positive effects of biochar on soil microbial diversity. |
| [53] |
Kielak AM, Barreto CC, Kowalchuk GA, van Veen JA, Kuramae EE. 2016. The ecology of acidobacteria: moving beyond genes and genomes. |
| [54] |
Li CJ, Zhang Z, Zhan PC, Lv AP, Li PP, et al. 2023. Comparative genomic analysis and proposal of Clostridium yunnanense sp. nov., Clostridium rhizosphaerae sp. nov., and Clostridium paridis sp. nov., three novel Clostridium sensu stricto endophytes with diverse capabilities of acetic acid and ethanol production. |
| [55] |
Zhang Y, Yang W, Zhou B, Yang J, Xing S. 2023. Effect of biochar-based fertilizer on soil bacteria and fungi quantity and community structure in acidified tea garden. |
| [56] |
Wang S, Cheng J, Li T, Liao Y. 2020. Response of soil fungal communities to continuous cropping of flue-cured tobacco. |
| [57] |
Jia X, Lin S, Zhang Q, Wang Y, Hong L, et al. 2024. The ability of different tea tree germplasm resources in south China to aggregate rhizosphere soil characteristic fungi affects tea quality. |
| [58] |
Sheng H, McNamara PJ, St. Leger RJ. 2022. Metarhizium: an opportunistic middleman for multitrophic lifestyles. |