[1]

Riding G, Teh BL, Yorston D, Steel DH. 2024. Comparison of the use of internal limiting membrane flaps versus conventional ILM peeling on post-operative anatomical and visual outcomes in large macular holes. Eye 38:1876−1881

doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03024-1
[2]

Chen J, Tao J, Zhang Y. 2024. The inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique is not recommended for the treatment of large macular holes smaller than 650 µm. Retina 44(12):2086−2090

doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000004248
[3]

Burton MJ, Ramke J, Marques AP, Bourne RRA, Congdon N, et al. 2021. The Lancet Global Health Commission on Global Eye Health: vision beyond 2020. The Lancet Global Health 9(4):e489−e551

doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30488-5
[4]

Thirunavukarasu AJ, Mahmood S, Malem A, Foster WP, Sanghera R, et al. 2024. Large language models approach expert-level clinical knowledge and reasoning in ophthalmology: A head-to-head cross-sectional study. PLoS Digit Health 3(4):e0000341

doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000341
[5]

Moëll B, Sand Aronsson F, Akbar S. 2025. Medical reasoning in LLMs: an in-depth analysis of DeepSeek R1. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence 8:1616145

doi: 10.3389/frai.2025.1616145
[6]

Wei J, Wang X, Huang M, Xu Y, Yang W. 2025. Evaluating the performance of ChatGPT on board style examination questions in ophthalmology: a meta analysis. Journal of Medical Systems 49:94

doi: 10.1007/s10916-025-02227-7
[7]

Huang M, Wang X, Zhou S, Cui X, Zhang Z, et al. 2025. Comparative performance of large language models for patient initiated ophthalmology consultations. Frontiers in Public Health 13:1673045

doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1673045
[8]

Goh E, Gallo R, Hom J, Strong E, Weng Y, et al. 2024. Large language model influence on diagnostic reasoning: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Network Open 7(10):e2440969

doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40969
[9]

Li Z, Wang Z, Xiu L, Zhang P, Wang W, et al. 2025. Large language model based multimodal system for detecting and grading ocular surface diseases from smartphone images. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 13:1600202

doi: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1600202
[10]

Huang AS, Hirabayashi K, Barna L, Parikh D, Pasquale LR. 2024. Assessment of a large language model's responses to questions and cases about glaucoma and retina management. JAMA Ophthalmol 142(4):371−375

doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.6917
[11]

Ayers JW, Poliak A, Dredze M, Leas EC, Zhu Z, Kelley JB, et al. 2023. Comparing physician and artificial intelligence chatbot responses to patient questions posted to a public social media forum. JAMA Internal Medicine 183:589−596

doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1838
[12]

Strzalkowski P, Strzalkowska A, Chhablani J, Pfau K, Errera MH, et al. 2024. Evaluation of the accuracy and readability of ChatGPT-4 and Google Gemini in providing information on retinal detachment: a multicenter expert comparative study. International Journal of Retina and Vitreous 10:61

doi: 10.1186/s40942-024-00579-9
[13]

Sandmann S, Hegselmann S, Fujarski M, Bickmann L, Wild B, et al. 2025. Benchmark evaluation of DeepSeek large language models in clinical decision-making. Nat Med 31(8):2546−2549

doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03727-2
[14]

Tao BK, Hua N, Milkovich J, Micieli JA. 2024. ChatGPT-3.5 and Bing Chat in ophthalmology: an updated evaluation of performance, readability, and informative sources. Eye 38:1897−1902

doi: 10.1038/s41433-024-03037-w
[15]

Fowler T, Pullen S, Birkett L. 2024. Performance of ChatGPT and Google Bard on the official Part 1 FRCOphth practice questions. The British Journal of Ophthalmology 108(10):1379−1383

doi: 10.1136/bjo-2023-324091
[16]

Carlà MM, Gambini G, Baldascino A, Giannuzzi F, Boselli F, et al. 2024. Exploring AI-chatbots' capability to suggest surgical planning in ophthalmology: ChatGPT versus Google Gemini analysis of retinal detachment cases. The British Journal of Ophthalmology 108(10):1457−1469

doi: 10.1136/bjo-2023-325143
[17]

Mehandru N, Miao BY, Almaraz ER, Sushil M, Butte AJ, et al. 2024. Evaluating large language models as agents in the clinic. NPJ digital medicine 7:84

doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01083-y
[18]

Radke NV, Ruamviboonsuk P, Steel DH, Tian T, Hunyor AP, et al. 2025. Controversies, consensuses, and guidelines on macular hole surgery by the Asia–Pacific Vitreo-retina Society (APVRS) and the Asia–Pacific Academy of Professors in Ophthalmology (AAPPO). Eye and Vision 12:30

doi: 10.1186/s40662-025-00446-0
[19]

Chaudhary V, Sarohia GS, Phillips MR, Zeraatkar D, Xie JS, et al. 2023. Role of positioning after full-thickness macular hole surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology Retina 7:33−43

doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2022.06.015
[20]

Chen G, Tzekov R, Jiang F, Mao S, Tong Y, et al. 2020. Inverted ILM flap technique versus conventional ILM peeling for idiopathic large macular holes: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PLoS ONE 15(7):e0236431

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236431
[21]

Manasa S, Kakkar P, Kumar A, et al. 2018. Comparative evaluation of standard ILM peel with inverted ILM flap technique in large macular holes: a prospective randomized study. Ophthalmic Surgery, Lasers & Imaging Retina 49(4):236−240

doi: 10.3928/23258160-20180329-04
[22]

Hager P, Jungmann F, Holland R, Bhagat K, Hubrecht I, et al. 2024. Evaluation and mitigation of the limitations of large language models in clinical decision-making. Nature Medicine 30(9):2613−2622

doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03097-1
[23]

Azzopardi M, Ng B, Logeswaran A, Loizou C, Cheong RCT, Gireesh P, et al. 2024. Artificial intelligence chatbots as sources of patient-education material for cataract surgery: ChatGPT-4 versus Google Bard. BMJ Open Ophthalmology 9(1):e001824

doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001824
[24]

Eid K, Eid A, Wang D, Raiker RS, Chen S, et al. 2024. Optimizing ophthalmology patient education via chatbot-generated materials: readability analysis of AI-generated patient education materials and the American society of ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery patient brochures. Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 40(2):212−216

doi: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002549
[25]

Chen X, Zhao Z, Zhang W, Xu P, Wu Y, et al. 2024. EyeGPT for patient inquiries and medical education: development and validation of an ophthalmology large language model. Journal of Medical Internet Research 26:e60063

doi: 10.2196/60063
[26]

Templin T, Perez MW, Sylvia S, Leek J, Sinnott-Armstrong N. 2024. Addressing 6 challenges in generative AI for digital health. PLOS Digital Health 3(8):e0000503

doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000503
[27]

Mihalache A, Huang RS, Popovic MM, Patil NS, Pandya BU, et al. 2024. Accuracy of an artificial intelligence chatbot's interpretation of clinical ophthalmic images. JAMA Ophthalmology 142(4):321−326

doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.0017
[28]

Agin A, Ozturk Y, Kivrak U. 2025. Harnessing generative pre-trained transformer technology for clinical decision support in retinal detachment. Medical Bulletin of Haseki 63(3):128−134

doi: 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2025.79553
[29]

Topol EJ. 2019. High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence. Nature Medicine 25:44−56

doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7
[30]

He J, Baxter SL, Xu J, Xu J, Zhou X, et al. 2019. The practical implementation of artificial intelligence technologies in medicine. Nature Medicine 25:30−36

doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0307-0