[1]

Umemi K, Inoue A. 2024. A model for predicting mean diameter at breast height from mean tree height and stand density. Journal of Forest Research 29(3):186−195

doi: 10.1080/13416979.2024.2311946
[2]

Song C, Yang B, Zhang L, Wu D. 2021. A handheld device for measuring the diameter at breast height of individual trees using laser ranging and deep-learning based image recognition. Plant Methods 17(1):67

doi: 10.1186/s13007-021-00748-z
[3]

Bian L, Zhang H, Ge Y, Čepl J, Stejskal J et al. 2022. Closing the gap between phenotyping and genotyping: review of advanced, image-based phenotyping technologies in forestry. Annals of Forest Science 79(1):22

doi: 10.1186/s13595-022-01143-x
[4]

Liu K, Shen X, Cao L, Wang G, Cao F. 2018. Estimating forest structural attributes using UAV-LiDAR data in Ginkgo plantations. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 146:465−482

doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.11.001
[5]

Qiu H, Zhang H, Lei K, Zhang H, Hu X. 2023. Forest digital twin: a new tool for forest management practices based on spatio-temporal data, 3D simulation Engine, and intelligent interactive environment. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 215:108416

doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2023.108416
[6]

Mao Z, Lu Z, Wu Y, Deng L. 2023. DBH estimation for individual tree: two-dimensional images or three-dimensional point clouds? Remote Sensing 15(16):4116

doi: 10.3390/rs15164116
[7]

Zhu X, Chen F, Zhang X, Zheng Y, Peng X, et al. 2024. Detection the maturity of multi-cultivar olive fruit in orchard environments based on Olive-EfficientDet. Scientia Horticulturae 324:112607

doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2023.112607
[8]

Hu G, Wang T, Wan M, Bao W, Zeng W. 2022. UAV remote sensing monitoring of pine forest diseases based on improved Mask R-CNN. International Journal of Remote Sensing 43:1274−1305

doi: 10.1080/01431161.2022.2032455
[9]

Moe KT, Owari T, Furuya N, Hiroshima T, Morimoto J. 2020. Application of UAV photogrammetry with LiDAR data to facilitate the estimation of tree locations and DBH values for high-value timber species in northern Japanese mixed-wood forests. Remote Sensing 12(17):2865

doi: 10.3390/rs12172865
[10]

Fu L, Duan G, Ye Q, Meng X, Luo P, et al. 2020. Prediction of Individual Tree Diameter Using a Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Modeling Approach and Airborne LiDAR Data. Remote Sensing 12(7):1066

doi: 10.3390/rs12071066
[11]

Guo H, Jia W, Li D, Sun Y, Wang F, et al. 2023. Modelling branch growth of Korean pine plantations based on stand conditions and climatic factors. Forest Ecology and Management 546:121318

doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121318
[12]

He X, Lei X, Liu D, Lei Y. 2023. Developing machine learning models with multiple environmental data to predict stand biomass in natural coniferous-broad leaved mixed forests in Jilin Province of China. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 212:108162

doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2023.108162
[13]

Jordan MI, Mitchell TM. 2015. Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science 349:255−260

doi: 10.1126/science.aaa8415
[14]

Xu J, Su M, Sun Y, Pan W, Cui H, et al. 2024. Tree crown segmentation and diameter at breast height prediction based on BlendMask in unmanned aerial vehicle imagery. Remote Sensing 16(2):368

doi: 10.3390/rs16020368
[15]

Sun Y, Jin X, Pukkala T, Li F. 2022. Predicting individual tree diameter of Larch (Larix olgensis) from UAV-LiDAR data using six different algorithms. Remote Sensing 14(5):1125

doi: 10.3390/rs14051125
[16]

Iizuka K, Kosugi Y, Noguchi S, Iwagami S. 2022. Toward a comprehensive model for estimating diameter at breast height of Japanese cypress (Chamaecyparis obtusa) using crown size derived from unmanned aerial systems. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 192:106579

doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106579
[17]

Ercanlı İ. 2020. Innovative deep learning artificial intelligence applications for predicting relationships between individual tree height and diameter at breast height. Forest Ecosystems 7(1):12

doi: 10.1186/s40663-020-00226-3
[18]

Lundberg SM, Lee SI. 2017. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/8a20a8621978632d76c43dfd28b67767-Paper.pdf
[19]

Xiang H, Shen Z, Tan L, Gao C, Wu G, et al. 2024. Community identification and carbon storage monitoring of Heritiera littoralis with UAV hyperspectral imaging. Ecological Indicators 167:112653

doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.112653
[20]

Li X, Du H, Mao F, Xu Y, Huang Z, et al. 2024. Estimation aboveground biomass in subtropical bamboo forests based on an interpretable machine learning framework. Environmental Modelling & Software 178:106071

doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2024.106071
[21]

da Silva AKV, Borges MVV, Batista TS, da Silva Junior CA, Furuya DEG, et al. 2021. Predicting eucalyptus diameter at breast height and total height with UAV-based spectral indices and machine learning. Forests 12(5):582

doi: 10.3390/f12050582
[22]

Qiu H, Zhang H, Lei K, Wang J, Zhang H, et al. 2025. A novel method for forest spatial structure heterogeneity evaluation of plantation utilizing point-wise vector network and neighborhood index. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 229:109774

doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2024.109774
[23]

Wang L, Zhang H, Lei K, Yang T, Zhang J, et al. 2024. A novel forest dynamic growth visualization method by incorporating spatial structural parameters based on convolutional neural network. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 17:3471−3488

doi: 10.1109/JSTARS.2023.3342445
[24]

Hui G, Zhang G, Zhao Z, Yang A. 2019. Methods of forest structure research: a review. Current Forestry Reports 5:142−154

doi: 10.1007/s40725-019-00090-7
[25]

Wang T, Wang G, Innes JL, Seely B, Chen B. 2017. ClimateAP: an application for dynamic local downscaling of historical and future climate data in Asia Pacific. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering 4(4):448−458

doi: 10.15302/j-fase-2017172
[26]

Zhang X, Wang H, Chhin S, Zhang J. 2020. Effects of competition, age and climate on tree slenderness of Chinese fir plantations in southern China. Forest Ecology and Management 458:117815

doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2019.117815
[27]

Liu Z, Huang T, Wu Y, Zhang X, Liu C, et al. 2024. Aboveground biomass inversion of forestland in a Jinsha River dry-hot valley by integrating high and medium spatial resolution optical images: a case study on Yuanmou County of Southwest China. Ecological Informatics 83:102796

doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102796
[28]

Ahmad Anees S, Mehmood K, Khan WR, Sajjad M, Alahmadi TA, et al. 2024. Integration of machine learning and remote sensing for above ground biomass estimation through Landsat-9 and field data in temperate forests of the Himalayan region. Ecological Informatics 82:102732

doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2024.102732
[29]

Qadeer A, Shakir M, Wang L, Talha SM. 2024. Evaluating machine learning approaches for aboveground biomass prediction in fragmented high-elevated forests using multi-sensor satellite data. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment 36:101291

doi: 10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101291
[30]

Prokhorenkova L, Gusev G, Vorobev A, Dorogush AV, Gulin A. 2018. CatBoost: unbiased boosting with categorical features. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 (NeurIPS 2018), Montréal, Canada. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2018/file/14491b756b3a51daac41c24863285549-Paper.pdf
[31]

Ke G, Meng Q, Finley T, Wang T, Chen W, et al. 2017. LightGBM: a highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (NIPS 2017), Long Beach, CA, USA. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2017/file/6449f44a102fde848669bdd9eb6b76fa-Paper.pdf
[32]

Bayat M, Bettinger P, Hassani M, Heidari S. 2021. Ten-year estimation of Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) volume increment in natural forests: a comparison of an artificial neural networks model, multiple linear regression and actual increment. Forestry 94(4):598−609

doi: 10.1093/forestry/cpab001
[33]

Yan X, Li J, Smith AR, Yang D, Ma T, et al. 2023. Evaluation of machine learning methods and multi-source remote sensing data combinations to construct forest above-ground biomass models. International Journal of Digital Earth 16(2):4471−4491

doi: 10.1080/17538947.2023.2270459
[34]

Liang Y, Kou W, Lai H, Wang J, Wang Q, et al. 2022. Improved estimation of aboveground biomass in rubber plantations by fusing spectral and textural information from UAV-based RGB imagery. Ecological Indicators 142:109286

doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109286
[35]

Borisov V, Leemann T, Seßler K, Haug J, Pawelczyk M, et al. 2024. Deep neural networks and tabular data: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems 35:7499−7519

doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2022.3229161
[36]

Shwartz-Ziv R, Armon A. 2022. Tabular data: deep learning is not all you need. Information Fusion 81:84−90

doi: 10.1016/j.inffus.2021.11.011
[37]

Tinkham WT, Swayze NC, Hoffman CM, Lad LE, Battaglia MA. 2022. Modeling the missing DBHs: Influence of model form on UAV DBH characterization. Forests 13(12):2077

doi: 10.3390/f13122077
[38]

Erfanifard Y, Hosingholizade A, Griess VC, Millan VEG, Pirasteh S. 2025. Estimating tree diameter at breast height (DBH) from UAV data: a comparison of oblique–Vertical imagery fusion and allometric modeling. Science of Remote Sensing 2025:100331

doi: 10.1016/j.srs.2025.100331
[39]

Heskes T, Sijben E, Bucur IG, Claassen T. 2020. Causal shapley values: Exploiting causal knowledge to explain individual predictions of complex models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (NeurIPS 2020), Vancouver, Canada. pp. 4778−4789 https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2020/file/32e54441e6382a7fbacbbbaf3c450059-Paper.pdf
[40]

Roberts DR, Bahn V, Ciuti S, Boyce MS, Elith J, et al. 2017. Cross-validation strategies for data with temporal, spatial, hierarchical, or phylogenetic structure. Ecography 40(8):913−929

doi: 10.1111/ecog.02881
[41]

Ploton P, Mortier F, Réjou-Méchain M, Barbier N, Picard N, et al. 2020. Spatial validation reveals poor predictive performance of large-scale ecological mapping models. Nature Communications 11:4540

doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18321-y
[42]

Geirhos R, Jacobsen JH, Michaelis C, Zemel R, Brendel W, et al. 2020. Shortcut learning in deep neural networks. Nature Machine Intelligence 2(11):665−673

doi: 10.1038/s42256-020-00257-z
[43]

Zhou K, Liu Z, Qiao Y, Xiang T, Loy CC. 2023. Domain generalization: a survey. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 45(4):4396−4415

doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2022.3195549