[1]

Sun H, Li K, Liu C, Yi C. 2023. Regulation and functions of non-m6A mRNA modifications. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 24:714−731

doi: 10.1038/s41580-023-00622-x
[2]

Song P, Cai Z, Jia G. 2026. m6A RNA methylation in plants: from molecular insights to applications. Annual Review of Plant Biology 77:in press

doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-070225-033859
[3]

Li T, Huang J, Wang G, Li H, Lü P. 2025. Regulatory roles of RNA modifications in plant development and fruit ripening. aBIOTECH 6:472−488

doi: 10.1007/s42994-025-00240-5
[4]

Bohnsack KE, Höbartner C, Bohnsack MT. 2019. Eukaryotic 5-methylcytosine (m5C) RNA methyltransferases: mechanisms, cellular functions, and links to disease. Genes 10:102

doi: 10.3390/genes10020102
[5]

Shen L, Ma J, Li P, Wu Y, Yu H. 2023. Recent advances in the plant epitranscriptome. Genome Biology 24:43

doi: 10.1186/s13059-023-02872-6
[6]

Shi H, Wei J, He C. 2019. Where, when, and how: context-dependent functions of RNA methylation writers, readers, and erasers. Molecular Cell 74:640−650

doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.04.025
[7]

Dong Y, Zhang W, Uslu VV. 2026. mRNA methylation at the crossroads of translation, transport, and decay in plant development and stress responses. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 89:102851

doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2025.102851
[8]

David R, Burgess A, Parker B, Li J, Pulsford K, et al. 2017. Transcriptome-wide mapping of RNA 5-methylcytosine in Arabidopsis mRNAs and noncoding RNAs. The Plant Cell 29:445−460

doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00751
[9]

Tang Y, Gao CC, Gao Y, Yang Y, Shi B, et al. 2020. OsNSUN2-mediated 5-methylcytosine mRNA modification enhances rice adaptation to high temperature. Developmental Cell 53:272−286.e7

doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.03.009
[10]

Huong TT, Ngoc LNT, Kang H. 2020. Functional characterization of a putative RNA demethylase ALKBH6 in Arabidopsis growth and abiotic stress responses. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21:6707

doi: 10.3390/ijms21186707
[11]

Xu Y, Székely A, Ostendorp S, Gupta1 S, Tomkins M, et al. 2024. Systemic mRNA transport depends on m5C methylation, nuclear mRNA export factors and developmental phase changes. bioRxiv 596576

doi: 10.1101/2024.05.30.596576
[12]

Pfaff C, Ehrnsberger HF, Flores-Tornero M, Sørensen BB, Schubert T, et al. 2018. ALY RNA-binding proteins are required for nucleocytosolic mRNA transport and modulate plant growth and development. Plant Physiology 177:226−240

doi: 10.1104/pp.18.00173
[13]

Zou Z, Sepich-Poore C, Zhou X, Wei J, He C. 2023. The mechanism underlying redundant functions of the YTHDF proteins. Genome Biology 24:17

doi: 10.1186/s13059-023-02862-8
[14]

Cui X, Liang Z, Shen L, Zhang Q, Bao S, et al. 2017. 5-methylcytosine RNA methylation in Arabidopsis Thaliana. Molecular Plant 10:1387−1399

doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.09.013
[15]

Sui Y, Li Z, Xiao X, Deng W, Duan B. 2026. The role of induced resistance in mitigating postharvest fungal diseases in fruits and vegetables. Journal of Advanced Research 83:91−111

doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2025.08.037
[16]

Dwivedi M, Singh P, Pandey AK. 2024. Botrytis fruit rot management: what have we achieved so far? Food Microbiology 122:104564

doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2024.104564
[17]

Li S, Zhao Y, Wu P, Grierson D, Gao L. 2024. Ripening and rot: how ripening processes influence disease susceptibility in fleshy fruits. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 66:1831−1863

doi: 10.1111/jipb.13739
[18]

Ji D, Liu W, Cui X, Liu K, Liu Y, et al. 2023. A receptor-like kinase SlFERL mediates immune responses of tomato to Botrytis cinerea by recognizing BcPG1 and fine-tuning MAPK signaling. New Phytologist 240:1189−1201

doi: 10.1111/nph.19210
[19]

Yang Q, Yang J, Wang Y, Du J, Zhang J, et al. 2022. Broad-spectrum chemicals block ROS detoxification to prevent plant fungal invasion. Current Biology 32:3886−3897.e6

doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.07.022
[20]

Tao N, Liu Y, Zhang B, Guo Y, Wang Q, et al. 2025. SlABCG9 functioning as a jasmonic acid transporter influences tomato resistance to Botrytis cinerea. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 73:3897−3907

doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.4c09064
[21]

Deng H, Pei Y, Xu X, Du X, Xue Q, et al. 2024. Ethylene-MPK8-ERF. C1-PR module confers resistance against Botrytis cinerea in tomato fruit without compromising ripening. New Phytologist 242:592−609

doi: 10.1111/nph.19632
[22]

Li S, Huang Y, Zhao Y, Wu P, Guo S, et al. 2025. Ripening-induced defence signalling in Botrytis cinerea-infected tomato fruits involves activation of ERF. F4 by a MYC2-NOR/RIN protein complex. Plant Biotechnology Journal 23:4126−4139

doi: 10.1111/pbi.70221
[23]

Zhang J, Dong D, Jia C, Li H, Liu L, et al. 2025. Fine-tuning of MYC2-mediated Botrytis defense response by the LBD40/42-CRL3BPM4 module in tomato. The Plant Cell 37:koaf258

doi: 10.1093/plcell/koaf258
[24]

Liu M, Zhang Z, Xu Z, Wang L, Chen C, et al. 2021. Overexpression of SlMYB75 enhances resistance to Botrytis cinerea and prolongs fruit storage life in tomato. Plant Cell Reports 40:43−58

doi: 10.1007/s00299-020-02609-w
[25]

Luo D, Sun W, Cai J, Hu G, Zhang D, et al. 2023. SlBBX20 attenuates JA signalling and regulates resistance to Botrytis cinerea by inhibiting SlMED25 in tomato. Plant Biotechnology Journal 21:792−805

doi: 10.1111/pbi.13997
[26]

Lee S, Choi J, Park J, Hong CP, Choi D, et al. 2023. DDM1-mediated gene body DNA methylation is associated with inducible activation of defense-related genes in Arabidopsis. Genome Biology 24:106

doi: 10.1186/s13059-023-02952-7
[27]

Chen D, Zhang Z, Chen Y, Li B, Chen T, et al. 2024. Transcriptional landscape of pathogen-responsive lncRNAs in tomato unveils the role of hydrolase encoding genes in response to Botrytis cinerea invasion. Plant, Cell & Environment 47:651−663

doi: 10.1111/pce.14757
[28]

Liu Y, Yu Y, Fei S, Chen Y, Xu Y, et al. 2023. Overexpression of sly-miR398b compromises disease resistance against Botrytis cinerea through regulating ROS homeostasis and JA-related defense genes in tomato. Plants 12:2572

doi: 10.3390/plants12132572
[29]

Prall W, Sheikh AH, Bazin J, Bigeard J, Almeida-Trapp M, et al. 2023. Pathogen-induced m6A dynamics affect plant immunity. The Plant Cell 35:4155−4172

doi: 10.1093/plcell/koad224
[30]

Zhu XT, Sanz-Jimenez P, Ning XT, Tahir ul Qamar M, Chen LL. 2024. Direct RNA sequencing in plants: practical applications and future perspectives. Plant Communications 5:101064

doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2024.101064
[31]

Moore S, Payton P, Wright M, Tanksley S, Giovannoni J. 2005. Utilization of tomato microarrays for comparative gene expression analysis in the Solanaceae. Journal of Experimental Botany 56:2885−2895

doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri283
[32]

Song Z, Yang Q, Dong B, Wang S, Xue J, et al. 2025. Nanopore RNA direct sequencing identifies that m6A modification is essential for sorbitol-controlled resistance to Alternaria alternata in apple. Developmental Cell 60:1439−1453.e5

doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2024.12.033
[33]

Li H. 2018. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34:3094−3100

doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty191
[34]

Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, et al. 2009. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078−2079

doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352
[35]

Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, et al. 2009. MEME SUITE: tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Research 37:W202−W208

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp335
[36]

Patro R, Duggal G, Love MI, Irizarry RA, Kingsford C. 2017. Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nature Methods 14:417−419

doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4197
[37]

Chagué V, Danit LV, Siewers V, Gronover CS, Tudzynski P, et al. 2006. Ethylene sensing and gene activation in Botrytis cinerea: a missing link in ethylene regulation of fungus-plant interactions? Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 19:33−42

doi: 10.1094/mpmi-19-0033
[38]

van Loon LC, Geraats BPJ, Linthorst HJM. 2006. Ethylene as a modulator of disease resistance in plants. Trends in Plant Science 11:184−191

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2006.02.005
[39]

Ding S, Feng S, Zhou S, Zhao Z, Liang X, et al. 2024. A novel LRR receptor-like kinase BRAK reciprocally phosphorylates PSKR1 to enhance growth and defense in tomato. The EMBO Journal 43:6104−6123

doi: 10.1038/s44318-024-00278-z
[40]

Shin JH, Park BS, Kim KS. 2022. The CsSTE50 adaptor protein in mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades is essential for pepper anthracnose disease of Colletotrichum scovillei. The Plant Pathology Journal 38:593−602

doi: 10.5423/ppj.oa.06.2022.0074
[41]

Zhang P, Wang Y, Gu X. 2020. RNA 5-methylcytosine controls plant development and environmental adaptation. Trends in Plant Science 25:954−958

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2020.07.004
[42]

Zhao X, Gong Y, Jiao Y, Zhang W, An D, et al. 2026. Epitranscriptomic profiling of m5C RNA methylation reveals a dynamic response to TSWV infection in tomato. Frontiers in Plant Science 16:1722290

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1722290
[43]

Zhao Z, Zeng S, Liu H, Chen M, Li D, et al. 2025. Dynamic abundances of m7G, m5C and m1A mRNA modifications are associated with tomato fruit quality following harvest. Postharvest Biology and Technology 225:113522

doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2025.113522
[44]

Zhou L, Tian S, Qin G. 2019. RNA methylomes reveal the m6A-mediated regulation of DNA demethylase gene SlDML2 in tomato fruit ripening. Genome Biology 20:156

doi: 10.1186/s13059-019-1771-7
[45]

Shen L, Liang Z, Wong CE, Yu H. 2019. Messenger RNA modifications in plants. Trends in Plant Science 24:328−341

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.01.005
[46]

Liang Z, Riaz A, Chachar S, Ding Y, Du H, et al. 2020. Epigenetic modifications of mRNA and DNA in plants. Molecular Plant 13:14−30

doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2019.12.007
[47]

Guo S, Zheng Y, Meng D, Zhao X, Sang Z, et al. 2022. DNA and coding/non-coding RNA methylation analysis provide insights into tomato fruit ripening. The Plant Journal 112:399−413

doi: 10.1111/tpj.15951
[48]

Wang X, Lu Z, Gomez A, Hon GC, Yue Y, et al. 2014. N6-methyladenosine-dependent regulation of messenger RNA stability. Nature 505:117−120

doi: 10.1038/nature12730
[49]

Murakami S, Olarerin-George AO, Liu JF, Zaccara S, Hawley B, et al. 2025. m6A alters ribosome dynamics to initiate mRNA degradation. Cell 188:3728−3743.e20

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2025.04.020
[50]

Ali M, Kaderbek T, Khan MA, Skalicky M, Brestic M, et al. 2025. Biosynthesis and multifaceted roles of reactive species in plant defense mechanisms during environmental cues. Plant Stress 18:101102

doi: 10.1016/j.stress.2025.101102
[51]

An B, Li B, Li H, Zhang Z, Qin G, et al. 2016. Aquaporin8 regulates cellular development and reactive oxygen species production, a critical component of virulence in Botrytis cinerea. New Phytologist 209:1668−1680

doi: 10.1111/nph.13721
[52]

Shan Q, Zhao D, Cao B, Zhu X, Wang C, et al. 2025. Jasmonic acid and nitric oxide orchestrate a hierarchical melatonin cascade for Botrytis cinerea resistance in tomato. Plant Physiology 197:kiaf078

doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiaf078
[53]

Bulasag AS, Ashida A, Miura A, Pring S, Kuroyanagi T, et al. 2024. Botrytis cinerea detoxifies the sesquiterpenoid phytoalexin rishitin through multiple metabolizing pathways. Fungal Genetics and Biology 172:103895

doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2024.103895
[54]

Daudi A, Cheng Z, O'Brien JA, Mammarella N, Khan S, et al. 2012. The apoplastic oxidative burst peroxidase in Arabidopsis is a major component of pattern-triggered immunity. The Plant Cell 24:275−287

doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.093039
[55]

Kuroyanagi T, Bulasag AS, Fukushima K, Ashida A, Suzuki T, et al. 2022. Botrytis cinerea identifies host plants via the recognition of antifungal capsidiol to induce expression of a specific detoxification gene. PNAS Nexus 1:pgac274

doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac274
[56]

Nie JA, Ding XH, Zhong XRY, Shi WC, Gao Z. 2025. Transcellular regulation of ETI-induced cell death. Trends in Plant Science 30:745−755

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2025.01.001
[57]

Ali M, Shi L, Khan MA, Ali A, Hu S, et al. 2025. Auxin biodynamics and its integral role in enhancing plant resilience to environmental cues. Physiologia Plantarum 177:e70165

doi: 10.1111/ppl.70165