[1]

Stadler M, Del Giorgio PA. 2022. Terrestrial connectivity, upstream aquatic history and seasonality shape bacterial community assembly within a large boreal aquatic network. The ISME journal 16(4):937−947

doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01146-y
[2]

Oliverio AM, Bissett A, McGuire K, Saltonstall K, Turner BL, et al. 2020. The role of phosphorus limitation in shaping soil bacterial communities and their metabolic capabilities. mBio 11(5):e1718−e1720

doi: 10.1128/mbio.01718-20
[3]

Xu D, Zhang X, Yuan X, Han H, Xue Y, et al. 2023. Hazardous risk of antibiotic resistance genes: host occurrence, distribution, mobility and vertical transmission from different environments to corn silage. Environmental Pollution) 338:122671

doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122671
[4]

Land M, Hauser L, Jun S, et al. 2015. Insights from 20 years of bacterial genome sequencing. Functional & integrative genomics 15(2):141−161

doi: 10.1007/s10142-015-0433-4
[5]

Land M, Hauser L, Jun SR, Nookaew I, Leuze MR, et al. 2018. Filling gaps in bacterial amino acid biosynthesis pathways with high-throughput genetics. PLoS Genetics 14(1):e1007147

doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007147
[6]

The UniProt Consortium. 2021. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Research 49(D1):D480−D489

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa1100
[7]

Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Brover V, Chetvernin V, et al. 2018. RefSeq: an update on prokaryotic genome annotation and curation. Nucleic Acids Research 46(D1):D851−D860

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1068
[8]

Hsieh AR, Tsai CY. 2024. Biomedical literature mining: graph kernel-based learning for gene-gene interaction extraction. European Journal of Medical Research 29(1):404

doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01983-5
[9]

Cruse K, Baibakova V, Abdelsamie M, Hong K, Bartel CJ, et al. 2023. Text mining the literature to inform experiments and rationalize impurity phase formation for BiFeO3. Chemistry of Materials 36(2):772−785

doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c02203
[10]

Bramer WM, Giustini D, Kramer BMR. 2016. Comparing the coverage, recall, and precision of searches for 120 systematic reviews in Embase, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar: a prospective study. Systematic Reviews 5:39

doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0215-7
[11]

Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Kleijnen J, Franco OH. 2017. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. Systematic Reviews 6(1):245

doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y
[12]

Hausner E, Waffenschmidt S, Kaiser T, Simon M. 2012. Routine development of objectively derived search strategies. Systematic Reviews 1:19

doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-19
[13]

Marcos-Pablos S, García-Peñalvo FJ. 2020. Information retrieval methodology for aiding scientific database search. Soft Computing 24(8):5551−5560

doi: 10.1007/s00500-018-3568-0
[14]

van de Schoot R, de Bruin J, Schram R, Zahedi P, de Boer J, et al. 2021. An open source machine learning framework for efficient and transparent systematic reviews. Nature Machine Intelligence 3(2):125−133

doi: 10.1038/s42256-020-00287-7
[15]

Mathes T, Klaßen P, Pieper D. 2017. Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a methodological review. BMC Medical Research Methodology 17(1):152

doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0431-4
[16]

Robson RC, Pham B, Hwee J, Thomas SM, Rios P, et al. 2019. Few studies exist examining methods for selecting studies, abstracting data, and appraising quality in a systematic review. Journal of clinical epidemiology 106:121−135

doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.003
[17]

Brown TB, Brown TB, Mann B, Mann B, Ryder N, et al. 2020. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33, NeurIPS 2020, Vancouver, Canada. US: Curran Associates, Inc. pp. 1877−1901 https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2020/file/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Paper.pdf
[18]

Singhal K, Azizi S, Tu T, Mahdavi SS, Wei J, et al. 2023. Large language models encode clinical knowledge. Nature 620(7972):172−180

doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06291-2
[19]

Cao C, Arora R, Cento P, et al. 2026. Automation of systematic reviews with large language models. medRxiv

doi: 10.1101/2025.06.13.25329541
[20]

Lieberum JL, Toews M, Metzendorf MI, Heilmeyer F, Siemens W, et al. 2025. Large language models for conducting systematic reviews: on the rise, but not yet ready for use-a scoping review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 181:111746

doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2025.111746
[21]

Jia YY, Pang LY, Bi MM, Yang XL, Song JP. 2025. Dependability of large language models in cardiovascular medicine: a scoping review. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 39(12):3534−3540

doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2025.07.026
[22]

Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, et al. 2009. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 339:b2700

doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2700
[23]

Liu L, Xie M, Wei D. 2022. Biological Detoxification of Mycotoxins: Current Status and Future Advances. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23(3):1064

doi: 10.3390/ijms23031064
[24]

Gabaldón T. 2008. Large-scale assignment of orthology: back to phylogenetics?. Genome biology 9(10):235

doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-10-235
[25]

Finn RD, Attwood TK, Babbitt PC, Bateman A, Bork P, et al. 2017. InterPro in 2017-beyond protein family and domain annotations. Nucleic Acids Research 45(D1):D190−D199

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1107
[26]

Raimondi R, Tzoumas N, Salisbury T, Di Simplicio S, Romano MR. 2023. Comparative analysis of large language models in the Royal College of Ophthalmologists fellowship exams. Eye 37(17):3530−3533

doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02563-3
[27]

Marshall IJ, Wallace BC. 2019. Toward systematic review automation: a practical guide to using machine learning tools in research synthesis. Systematic Reviews 8(1):163

doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1074-9
[28]

Timmins F, McCabe C. 2005. How to conduct an effective literature search. Nursing Standard 20(11):41−47

doi: 10.7748/ns2005.11.20.11.41.c4010
[29]

Jonnalagadda SR, Goyal P, Huffman MD. 2015. Automating data extraction in systematic reviews: a systematic review. Systematic Reviews 4:78

doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0066-7
[30]

Bramer WM, De Jonge GB, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J. 2018. A systematic approach to searching: an efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. Journal of the Medical Library Association 106(4):531−541

doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.283
[31]

Gorelik AJ, Gorelik MG, Ridout KK, Nimarko AF, Peisch V, et al. 2023. Evaluating efficiency and accuracy of deep-learning-based approaches on study selection for psychiatry systematic reviews. Nature Mental Health 1(9):623−632

doi: 10.1038/s44220-023-00109-w
[32]

Kuang YR, Zou MX, Niu HQ, Zheng BY, Zhang TL, et al. 2023. ChatGPT encounters multiple opportunities and challenges in neurosurgery. International Journal of Surgery 109(10):2886−2891

doi: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001086
[33]

Panayi A, Ward K, Benhadji-Schaff A, Ibanez-Lopez AS, Xia A, et al. 2023. Evaluation of a prototype machine learning tool to semi-automate data extraction for systematic literature reviews. Systematic reviews 12(1):187

doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02351-w
[34]

Tian S, Jin Q, Yeganova L, Lai PT, Zhu Q, et al. 2023. Opportunities and challenges for ChatGPT and large language models in biomedicine and health. Briefings in Bioinformatics 25(1):bbad493

doi: 10.1093/bib/bbad493
[35]

Basyal L, Sanghvi M. 2023. Text summarization using large language models: a comparative study of MPT-7b-instruct, Falcon-7b-instruct, and OpenAI Chat-GPT models. arXiv 2310.10449

doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2310.10449
[36]

Kim HW, Shin DH, Kim J, Lee GH, Cho JW. 2024. Assessing the performance of ChatGPT's responses to questions related to epilepsy: a cross-sectional study on natural language processing and medical information retrieval. Seizure 114:1−8

doi: 10.2196/preprints.48718