[1]

Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna JA, et al. 2012. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337:816−821

doi: 10.1126/science.1225829
[2]

Pacesa M, Pelea O, Jinek M. 2024. Past, present, and future of CRISPR genome editing technologies. Cell 187:1076−1100

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.01.042
[3]

Li B, Sun C, Li J, Gao C. 2024. Targeted genome-modification tools and their advanced applications in crop breeding. Nature Reviews Genetics 25:603−622

doi: 10.1038/s41576-024-00720-2
[4]

Anzalone AV, Koblan LW, Liu DR. 2020. Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors. Nature Biotechnology 38:824−844

doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0561-9
[5]

Ivics Z, Hackett PB, Plasterk RH, Izsvák Z. 1997. Molecular Reconstruction of Sleeping Beauty, a Tc1-like Transposon from Fish, and Its Transposition in Human Cells. Cell 91:501−510

doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80436-5
[6]

Ding S, Wu X, Li G, Han M, Zhuang Y, et al. 2005. Efficient Transposition of the piggyBac (PB) Transposon in Mammalian Cells and Mice. Cell 122:473−483

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.07.013
[7]

Tao XY, Feng SL, Yuan L, Li YJ, Li XJ, et al. 2025. Harnessing transposable elements for plant functional genomics and genome engineering. Trends in Plant Science 30:1130−1146

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2025.03.007
[8]

Altae-Tran H, Kannan S, Demircioglu FE, Oshiro R, Nety SP, et al. 2021. The widespread IS200/IS605 transposon family encodes diverse programmable RNA-guided endonucleases. Science 374:57−65

doi: 10.1126/science.abj6856
[9]

Karvelis T, Druteika G, Bigelyte G, Budre K, Zedaveinyte R, et al. 2021. Transposon-associated TnpB is a programmable RNA-guided DNA endonuclease. Nature 599:692−696

doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04058-1
[10]

Saito M, Xu P, Faure G, Maguire S, Kannan S, et al. 2023. Fanzor is a eukaryotic programmable RNA-guided endonuclease. Nature 620:660−668

doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06356-2
[11]

Zhang F, Peng Y, Fan D, Song G, Gao X, et al. 2025. Engineering a CRISPR-associated IscB system for developing miniature genome-editing tools in human cells and mouse embryos. Nature Communications 16:10693

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-65724-w
[12]

Lv Z, Chen W, Fang S, Dong B, Wang X, et al. 2024. Targeted mutagenesis in Arabidopsis and medicinal plants using transposon‐associated TnpB. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 66:2083−2086

doi: 10.1111/jipb.13758
[13]

Liu P, Panda K, Edwards SA, Swanson R, Yi H, et al. 2024. Transposase-assisted target-site integration for efficient plant genome engineering. Nature 631:593−600

doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07613-8
[14]

Klompe SE, Vo PLH, Halpin-Healy TS, Sternberg SH. 2019. Transposon-encoded CRISPR–Cas systems direct RNA-guided DNA integration. Nature 571:219−225

doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1323-z
[15]

Strecker J, Ladha A, Gardner Z, Schmid-Burgk JL, Makarova KS, et al. 2019. RNA-guided DNA insertion with CRISPR-associated transposases. Science 365:48−53

doi: 10.1126/science.aax9181
[16]

Wilkinson ME, Frangieh CJ, Macrae RK, Zhang F. 2023. Structure of the R2 non-LTR retrotransposon initiating target-primed reverse transcription. Science 380:301−308

doi: 10.1126/science.adg7883
[17]

Zeng J, Liu X, Dong Z, Zhang F, Qiu F, et al. 2024. Discovering a mitochondrion-localized BAHD acyltransferase involved in calystegine biosynthesis and engineering the production of 3β-tigloyloxytropane. Nature Communications 15:3623

doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-47968-0
[18]

Lv B, Feng Q, Shao G, Zuo A, Yan X, et al. 2025. The transcription factor Dof32 coordinates salvianolic acid biosynthesis and drought tolerance in Salvia miltiorrhiza. Plant Physiology 198:kiaf221

doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiaf221
[19]

Shu G, Tang Y, Yuan M, Wei N, Zhang F, et al. 2022. Molecular insights into AabZIP1-mediated regulation on artemisinin biosynthesis and drought tolerance in Artemisia annua. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 12:1500−1513

doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.09.026
[20]

Yuan M, Shu G, Zhou J, He P, Xiang L, et al. 2023. AabHLH113 integrates jasmonic acid and abscisic acid signaling to positively regulate artemisinin biosynthesis in Artemisia annua. New Phytologist 237:885−899

doi: 10.1111/nph.18567
[21]

Sasnauskas G, Tamulaitiene G, Druteika G, Carabias A, Silanskas A, et al. 2023. TnpB structure reveals minimal functional core of Cas12 nuclease family. Nature 616:384−389

doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05826-x
[22]

Wang M, Sun Z, Liu Y, Yin P, Liang C, et al. 2024. Hypercompact TnpB and truncated TnpB systems enable efficient genome editing in vitro and in vivo. Cell Discovery 10:31

doi: 10.1038/s41421-023-00645-w
[23]

Li Z, Guo R, Sun X, Li G, Shao Z, et al. 2024. Engineering a transposon-associated TnpB-ωRNA system for efficient gene editing and phenotypic correction of a tyrosinaemia mouse model. Nature Communications 15:831

doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-45197-z
[24]

Thornton BW, Weissman RF, Rodriguez JE, Tran RV, Duong BT, et al. 2026. Engineered TnpB genome editors for plants and human cells identified by ribonucleoprotein mutational scanning. Nature Biotechnology in press

doi: 10.1038/s41587-026-03059-7
[25]

Xiang G, Li Y, Sun J, Huo Y, Cao S, et al. 2024. Evolutionary mining and functional characterization of TnpB nucleases identify efficient miniature genome editors. Nature Biotechnology 42:745−757

doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01857-x
[26]

Karmakar S, Panda D, Panda S, Dash M, Saha R, et al. 2024. A miniature alternative to Cas9 and Cas12: transposon‐associated TnpB mediates targeted genome editing in plants. Plant Biotechnology Journal 22:2950−2953

doi: 10.1111/pbi.14416
[27]

Li Q, Wang Y, Hou Z, Zong H, Wang X, et al. 2024. Genome editing in plants using the TnpB transposase system. aBIOTECH 5:225−230

doi: 10.1007/s42994-024-00172-6
[28]

Zhang R, Tang X, He Y, Li Y, Wang W, et al. 2024. IsDge10 is a hypercompact TnpB nuclease that confers efficient genome editing in rice. Plant Communications 5:101068

doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2024.101068
[29]

Ma X, Zhang X, Liu H, Li Z. 2020. Highly efficient DNA-free plant genome editing using virally delivered CRISPR-Cas9. Nature Plants 6:773−779

doi: 10.1038/s41477-020-0704-5
[30]

Weiss T, Kamalu M, Shi H, Li Z, Amerasekera J, et al. 2025. Viral delivery of an RNA-guided genome editor for transgene-free germline editing in Arabidopsis. Nature Plants 11:967−976

doi: 10.1038/s41477-025-01989-9
[31]

Nagalakshmi U, Rodriguez JE, Nguyen T, Weissman RF, Thornton BW, et al. 2026. High-efficiency, transgene-free plant genome editing by viral delivery of an engineered TnpB. Nature Plants 12:503−511

doi: 10.1038/s41477-026-02237-4
[32]

Kapitonov VV, Makarova KS, Koonin EV. 2016. ISC, a novel group of bacterial and archaeal DNA transposons that encode Cas9 homologs. Journal of Bacteriology 198:797−807

doi: 10.1128/jb.00783-15
[33]

Chandler M, Fayet O, Rousseau P, Ton Hoang B, Duval-Valentin G. 2015. Copy-out-paste-in transposition of IS911: A major transposition pathway. Microbiology Spectrum 3(4):MDNA3-0031-2014

doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.MDNA3-0031-2014
[34]

He S, Guynet C, Siguier P, Hickman AB, Dyda F, et al. 2013. IS 200/IS 605 family single-strand transposition: mechanism of IS 608 strand transfer. Nucleic Acids Research 41:3302−3313

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt014
[35]

Schuler G, Hu C, Ke A. 2022. Structural basis for RNA-guided DNA cleavage by IscB-ωRNA and mechanistic comparison with Cas9. Science 376:1476−1481

doi: 10.1126/science.abq7220
[36]

Han D, Xiao Q, Wang Y, Zhang H, Dong X, et al. 2023. Development of miniature base editors using engineered IscB nickase. Nature Methods 20:1029−1036

doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-01898-9
[37]

Xue N, Hong D, Zhang D, Wang Q, Zhang S, et al. 2024. Engineering IscB to develop highly efficient miniature editing tools in mammalian cells and embryos. Molecular Cell 84:3128−3140.e4

doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2024.07.007
[38]

Develtere W, Decaestecker W, Rombaut D, Anders C, Clicque E, et al. 2024. Continual improvement of CRISPR-induced multiplex mutagenesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal: For Cell and Molecular Biology 119:1158−1172

doi: 10.1111/tpj.16785
[39]

Le TT, Choi HI, Kim JW, Yun JH, Lee YH, et al. 2025. Cas9-mediated gene-editing frequency in microalgae is doubled by harnessing the interaction between importin α and phytopathogenic NLSs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 122:e2415072122

doi: 10.1073/pnas.2415072122
[40]

Tsukamoto T, Mizuta H, Sakai E, Sakurai F, Mizuguchi H. 2025. Evaluation of the correlation between nuclear localization levels and genome editing efficiencies of Cas12a fused with nuclear localization signals. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences 114:841−848

doi: 10.1016/j.xphs.2024.10.029
[41]

Schreiber T, Prange A, Schäfer P, Iwen T, Grützner R, et al. 2024. Efficient scar-free knock-ins of several kilobases in plants by engineered CRISPR-Cas endonucleases. Molecular Plant 17:824−837

doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2024.03.013
[42]

Han L, Hu Y, Mo Q, Yang H, Gu F, et al. 2024. Engineering miniature IscB nickase for robust base editing with broad targeting range. Nature Chemical Biology 20:1629−1639

doi: 10.1038/s41589-024-01670-w
[43]

Yan H, Tan X, Zou S, Sun Y, Ke A, et al. 2024. Assessing and engineering the IscB-ωRNA system for programmed genome editing. Nature Chemical Biology 20:1617−1628

doi: 10.1038/s41589-024-01669-3
[44]

Li Y, Li C, Yang J, Sun X, Li J, et al. 2026. Engineering the hypercompact miniature IscB–ωRNA systems for efficient rice genome editing. Plant Communications 7:101562

doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2025.101562
[45]

Xiao Q, Li G, Han D, Wang H, Yao M, et al. 2025. Engineered IscB-ωRNA system with expanded target range for base editing. Nature Chemical Biology 21:100−108

doi: 10.1038/s41589-024-01706-1
[46]

Weiss T, Kamalu M, Shi H, Wirnowski G, Ingelsson A, et al. 2026. Efficient transgene-free multiplexed germline editing via viral delivery of an engineered TnpB. Plant Biotechnology Journal 24(6):4358−4360

doi: 10.1111/pbi.70644
[47]

Cao X, Bai S, Li J, Sun Y. 2025. A simple and efficient system for evaluating plant genome editing efficiency and its application in optimizing the ISAam1 TnpB nuclease. Frontiers in Plant Science 16:1620874

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1620874
[48]

Ji Y, Sun Y, Zhou H, Liu Z, Sun Z, et al. 2025. Engineer the eukaryotic OMEGA-Fanzor systems for genome editing in plants. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology Early View:70049

doi: 10.1111/jipb.70049
[49]

Zhao G, Liu Y, Zhang G, Wang J, Zou Z, et al. 2025. Engineered hypercompact Fanzor-ωRNA system with enhanced genome editing activity. Molecular Cell 85:4138−4151.e4

doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2025.09.031
[50]

Wei Y, Gao P, Pan D, Li G, Chen Y, et al. 2026. Engineering eukaryotic transposon-encoded Fanzor2 system for genome editing in mammals. Nature Chemical Biology 22:48−57

doi: 10.1038/s41589-025-01902-7
[51]

Bao W, Jurka J. 2013. Homologues of bacterial TnpB_IS605 are widespread in diverse eukaryotic transposable elements. Mobile DNA 4:12

doi: 10.1186/1759-8753-4-12
[52]

Jiang K, Lim J, Sgrizzi S, Trinh M, Kayabolen A, et al. 2023. Programmable RNA-guided DNA endonucleases are widespread in eukaryotes and their viruses. Science Advances 9:eadk0171

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adk0171
[53]

Kong X, Zhang H, Li G, Wang Z, Kong X, et al. 2023. Engineered CRISPR-OsCas12f1 and RhCas12f1 with robust activities and expanded target range for genome editing. Nature Communications 14:2046

doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-37829-7
[54]

Zhang H, Kong X, Xue M, Hu J, Wang Z, et al. 2023. An engineered xCas12i with high activity, high specificity, and broad PAM range. Protein & Cell 14:540−545

doi: 10.1093/procel/pwac052
[55]

Tang X, Zheng X, Qi Y, Zhang D, Cheng Y, et al. 2016. A Single Transcript CRISPR-Cas9 System for Efficient Genome Editing in Plants. Molecular Plant 9:1088−1091

doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2016.05.001
[56]

Tang X, Ren Q, Yan X, Zhang R, Liu L, et al. 2024. Boosting genome editing in plants with single transcript unit surrogate reporter systems. Plant Communications 5:100921

doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2024.100921
[57]

Lampe GD, King RT, Halpin-Healy TS, Klompe SE, Hogan MI, et al. 2024. Targeted DNA integration in human cells without double-strand breaks using CRISPR-associated transposases. Nature Biotechnology 42:87−98

doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01748-1
[58]

Tou CJ, Orr B, Kleinstiver BP. 2023. Precise cut-and-paste DNA insertion using engineered type V-K CRISPR-associated transposases. Nature Biotechnology 41:968−979

doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01574-x
[59]

Lampe GD, Liang AR, Zhang DJ, Fernández IS, Sternberg SH. 2025. Structure-guided engineering of type I-F CASTs for targeted gene insertion in human cells. Nature Communications 16:7891

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63164-0
[60]

Liu J, Aliaga Goltsman DS, Alexander LM, Khayi KK, Hong JH, et al. 2025. Integration of therapeutic cargo into the human genome with programmable type V-K CAST. Nature Communications 16:2427

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57416-2
[61]

Witte IP, Lampe GD, Eitzinger S, Miller SM, Berríos KN, et al. 2025. Programmable gene insertion in human cells with a laboratory-evolved CRISPR-associated transposase. Science 388:eadt5199

doi: 10.1126/science.adt5199
[62]

Tenjo-Castaño F, Rout SS, Dey S, Montoya G. 2025. Unlocking the potential of CRISPR-associated transposons: from structural to functional insights. Trends in Genetics 41:660−677

doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2025.04.005
[63]

Fell CW, Villiger L, Lim J, Hiraizumi M, Tagliaferri D, et al. 2025. Reprogramming site-specific retrotransposon activity to new DNA sites. Nature 642:1080−1089

doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08877-4
[64]

Vo PLH, Ronda C, Klompe SE, Chen EE, Acree C, et al. 2021. CRISPR RNA-guided integrases for high-efficiency, multiplexed bacterial genome engineering. Nature Biotechnology 39:480−89

doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-00745-y
[65]

Cheng ZH, Wu J, Liu JQ, Min D, Liu DF, et al. 2022. Repurposing CRISPR RNA-guided integrases system for one-step, efficient genomic integration of ultra-long DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Research 50:7739−7750

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac554
[66]

Edmonds KK, Wilkinson ME, Strebinger D, Chen H, Lash B, et al. 2025. Structure and biochemistry-guided engineering of an all-RNA system for DNA insertion with R2 retrotransposons. Nature Communications 16:6079

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-61321-z
[67]

Luo W, Galvan DL, Woodard LE, Dorset D, Levy S, et al. 2017. Comparative analysis of chimeric ZFP-, TALE- and Cas9-piggyBac transposases for integration into a single locus in human cells. Nucleic Acids Research 45:8411−8422

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx572
[68]

Ma S, Wang X, Hu Y, Lv J, Liu C, et al. 2020. Enhancing site-specific DNA integration by a Cas9 nuclease fused with a DNA donor-binding domain. Nucleic Acids Research 48:10590−10601

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa779
[69]

Yang G, Zhang F, Hancock CN, Wessler SR. 2007. Transposition of the rice miniature inverted repeat transposable element mPing in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104:10962−10967

doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702080104
[70]

Kazazian HH, Moran JV. 2017. Mobile DNA in Health and Disease. The New England Journal of Medicine 377:361−370

doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1510092
[71]

Kojima KK, Fujiwara H. 2005. Long-term inheritance of the 28S rDNA-specific retrotransposon R2. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22:2157−2165

doi: 10.1093/molbev/msi210
[72]

Roiha H, Miller JR, Woods LC, Glover DM. 1981. Arrangements and rearrangements of sequences flanking the two types of rDNA insertion in D. melanogaster. Nature 290:749−754

doi: 10.1038/290749a0
[73]

Fujiwara H, Ogura T, Takada N, Miyajima N, Ishikawa H, et al. 1984. Introns and their flanking sequences of Bombyx mori rDNA. Nucleic Acids Research 12:6861−6869

doi: 10.1093/nar/12.17.6861
[74]

Deng P, Tan SQ, Yang QY, Fu L, Wu Y, et al. 2023. Structural RNA components supervise the sequential DNA cleavage in R2 retrotransposon. Cell 186:2865−79. e20

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.05.032
[75]

Kannan S, Altae-Tran H, Zhu S, Xu P, Strebinger D, et al. 2026. Evolution-guided protein design of IscB for persistent epigenome editing in vivo. Nature Biotechnology 44(5):759−770

doi: 10.1038/s41587-025-02655-3
[76]

Kim DY, Chung Y, Lee Y, Jeong D, Park KH, et al. 2022. Hypercompact adenine base editors based on a Cas12f variant guided by engineered RNA. Nature Chemical Biology 18:1005−13

doi: 10.1038/s41589-022-01077-5
[77]

Nanasato Y, Kawabe H, Ueno S, Konagaya KI, Endo M, et al. 2024. Improvement of genome editing efficiency by Cas9 codon optimization in Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica D. Don). Plant Biotechnology 41:335−344

doi: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.24.0709a
[78]

Liu T, Zeng D, Zheng Z, Lin Z, Xue Y, et al. 2021. The ScCas9++ variant expands the CRISPR toolbox for genome editing in plants. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 63:1611−1619

doi: 10.1111/jipb.13164
[79]

Li X, Chen W, Martin BK, Calderon D, Lee C, et al. 2024. Chromatin context-dependent regulation and epigenetic manipulation of prime editing. Cell 187:2411−2427.e25

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.03.020
[80]

Chauhan VP, Sharp PA, Langer R. 2025. Engineered prime editors with minimal genomic errors. Nature 646:1254−1260

doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09537-3
[81]

Song J, Bradeen JM, Naess SK, Helgeson JP, Jiang J. 2003. BIBAC and TAC clones containing potato genomic DNA fragments larger than 100 kb are not stable in Agrobacterium. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 107:958−64

doi: 10.1007/s00122-003-1334-9
[82]

Skoog F, Miller CO. 1957. Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissues cultured in vitro. Symposium of the Society for Experimental Biology 11:118−130
[83]

Mason MG, Mathews DE, Argyros DA, Maxwell BB, Kieber JJ, et al. 2005. Multiple Type-B Response Regulators Mediate Cytokinin Signal Transduction in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 17:3007−3018

doi: 10.1105/tpc.105.035451
[84]

Meng WJ, Cheng ZJ, Sang YL, Zhang MM, Rong XF, et al. 2017. Type-B ARABIDOPSIS RESPONSE REGULATORs specify the shoot stem cell niche by dual regulation of WUSCHEL. The Plant Cell 29:1357−1372

doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00640
[85]

Liu Z, Dai X, Li J, Liu N, Liu X, et al. 2020. The Type-B Cytokinin Response Regulator ARR1 Inhibits Shoot Regeneration in an ARR12-Dependent Manner in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 32:2271−2291

doi: 10.1105/tpc.19.00022
[86]

Zhai N, Xu L. 2021. Pluripotency acquisition in the middle cell layer of callus is required for organ regeneration. Nature Plants 7:1453−1460

doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-01015-8
[87]

Iwase A, Harashima H, Ikeuchi M, Rymen B, Ohnuma M, et al. 2017. WIND1 promotes shoot regeneration through transcriptional activation of ENHANCER OF SHOOT REGENERATION1 in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 29:54−69

doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00623
[88]

Ikeuchi M, Favero DS, Sakamoto Y, Iwase A, Coleman D, et al. 2019. Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Regeneration. Annual Review of Plant Biology 70:377−406

doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100434
[89]

Iwase A, Mitsuda N, Koyama T, Hiratsu K, Kojima M, et al. 2011. The AP2/ERF transcription factor WIND1 controls cell dedifferentiation in Arabidopsis. Current Biology 21:508−514

doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.02.020
[90]

Ikeuchi M, Iwase A, Ito T, Tanaka H, Favero DS, et al. 2022. Wound-inducible WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX 13 is required for callus growth and organ reconnection. Plant Physiology 188:425−441

doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab510
[91]

Lotan T, Ohto MA, Yee KM, West MAL, Lo R, et al. 1998. Arabidopsis LEAFY COTYLEDON1 is sufficient to induce embryo development in vegetative cells. Cell 93:1195−1205

doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81463-4
[92]

Stone SL, Kwong LW, Yee KM, Pelletier J, Lepiniec L, et al. 2001. LEAFY COTYLEDON2 encodes a B3 domain transcription factor that induces embryo development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98:11806−11811

doi: 10.1073/pnas.201413498
[93]

Barton MK. 2010. Twenty years on: The inner workings of the shoot apical meristem, a developmental dynamo. Developmental Biology 341:95−113

doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2009.11.029
[94]

Zuo J, Niu QW, Frugis G, Chua NH. 2002. The WUSCHEL gene promotes vegetative-to-embryonic transition in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 30:349−359

doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313x.2002.01289.x
[95]

Wang N, Ryan L, Sardesai N, Wu E, Lenderts B, et al. 2023. Leaf transformation for efficient random integration and targeted genome modification in maize and sorghum. Nature Plants 9:255−270

doi: 10.1038/s41477-022-01338-0
[96]

Debernardi JM, Tricoli DM, Ercoli MF, Hayta S, Ronald P, et al. 2020. A GRF-GIF chimeric protein improves the regeneration efficiency of transgenic plants. Nature Biotechnology 38:1274−1279

doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0703-0
[97]

Lowe K, Wu E, Wang N, Hoerster G, Hastings C, et al. 2016. Morphogenic Regulators Baby boom and Wuschel Improve Monocot Transformation. The Plant Cell 28:1998−2015

doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00124
[98]

Maher MF, Nasti RA, Vollbrecht M, Starker CG, Clark MD, et al. 2020. Plant gene editing through de novo induction of meristems. Nature Biotechnology 38:84−89

doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0337-2
[99]

Ren H, Shankle K, Cho MJ, Tjahjadi M, Khanday I, et al. 2024. Synergistic induction of fertilization-independent embryogenesis in rice egg cells by paternal-genome-expressed transcription factors. Nature Plants 10:1892−1899

doi: 10.1038/s41477-024-01848-z
[100]

Wang K, Shi L, Liang X, Zhao P, Wang W, et al. 2022. The gene TaWOX5 overcomes genotype dependency in wheat genetic transformation. Nature Plants 8:110−117

doi: 10.1038/s41477-021-01085-8
[101]

Liu L, Shu Y, Wang Y, Liu M, Xu S, et al. 2025. The pan genome analysis of WOX gene family in apple and the two sides of MdWUS-1 in promoting leaf-borne shoot. Horticulture Research 12:uhaf117

doi: 10.1093/hr/uhaf117
[102]

Wittmer J, Pijnenburg M, Wijsman T, Pelzer S, Adema K, et al. 2025. Rational design of induced regeneration via somatic embryogenesis in the absence of exogenous phytohormones. The Plant Cell 37:koaf252

doi: 10.1093/plcell/koaf252
[103]

Cao X, Xie H, Song M, Lu J, Ma P, et al. 2023. Cut–dip–budding delivery system enables genetic modifications in plants without tissue culture. The Innovation 4:100345

doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100345
[104]

Lu J, Li S, Deng S, Wang M, Wu Y, et al. 2024. A method of genetic transformation and gene editing of succulents without tissue culture. Plant Biotechnology Journal 22:1981−88

doi: 10.1111/pbi.14318
[105]

Ajdanian L, Niazian M, Torkamaneh D. 2024. Optimizing ex vitro one‐step RUBY‐equipped hairy root transformation in drug‐ and hemp‐type Cannabis. Plant Biotechnology Journal 22:1957−59

doi: 10.1111/pbi.14314
[106]

Fan YL, Zhang XH, Zhong LJ, Wang XY, Jin LS, et al. 2020. One-step generation of composite soybean plants with transgenic roots by Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated transformation. BMC Plant Biol 20:208

doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02421-4
[107]

de Koning R, Daryanavard H, Garmyn J, Kiekens R, Toili MEM, et al. 2023. Fine-tuning CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) using a hairy root transformation system and in silico prediction models. Frontiers in Plant Science 14:1233418

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1233418
[108]

Ramasamy M, Dominguez MM, Irigoyen S, Padilla CS, Mandadi KK. 2023. Rhizobium rhizogenes-mediated hairy root induction and plant regeneration for bioengineering Citrus. Plant Biotechnology Journal 21:1728−1730

doi: 10.1111/pbi.14096
[109]

Liu L, Qu J, Wang C, Liu M, Zhang C, et al. 2024. An efficient genetic transformation system mediated by Rhizobium rhizogenes in fruit trees based on the transgenic hairy root to shoot conversion. Plant Biotechnology Journal 22:2093−2103

doi: 10.1111/pbi.14328
[110]

Ma H, Liu N, Sun X, Zhu M, Mao T, et al. 2023. Establishment of an efficient transformation system and its application in regulatory mechanism analysis of biological macromolecules in tea plants. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 244:125372

doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125372
[111]

Yi X, Wang C, Yuan X, Zhang M, Zhang C, et al. 2024. Exploring an economic and highly efficient genetic transformation and genome-editing system for radish through developmental regulators and visible reporter. The Plant Journal 120:1682−1692

doi: 10.1111/tpj.17068
[112]

Cao X, Xie H, Song M, Zhao L, Liu H, et al. 2024. Simple method for transformation and gene editing in medicinal plants. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 66:17−19

doi: 10.1111/jipb.13593
[113]

Cao X, Qin Z, Fan P, Wang S, Meng X, et al. 2025. A simple widely applicable hairy root transformation method for gene function studies in medicinal plants. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B 15:4300−4305

doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2025.03.038