[1]

Mitchell P, Liew G, Gopinath B, Wong TY. 2018. Age-related macular degeneration. The Lancet 392:1147−1159

doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31550-2
[2]

Jeong YD, Park S, Kim MS, Hong SH, Aalruz H, et al. 2025. Global burden of vision impairment due to age-related macular degeneration, 1990–2021, with forecasts to 2050: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. The Lancet Global Health 13:e1175−e1190

doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(25)00143-3
[3]

Fleckenstein M, Keenan TDL, Guymer RH, Chakravarthy U, Schmitz-Valckenberg S, et al. 2021. Age-related macular degeneration. Nature Reviews Disease Primers 7:31

doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00265-2
[4]

Khanani AM, Kotecha A, Chang A, Chen SJ, Chen Y, et al. 2024. TENAYA and LUCERNE two-year results from the phase 3 neovascular age-related macular degeneration trials of faricimab with treat-and-extend dosing in year 2. Ophthalmology 131:914−926

doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2024.02.014
[5]

Korobelnik JF, Lanzetta P, Leal S, Holz FG, Clark WL, et al. 2026. Intravitreal aflibercept 8 Mg in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Ophthalmology 133:39−50

doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2025.08.022
[6]

Blazaki S, Blavakis E, Smoustopoulos G, Bontzos G, Stavrakakis A, et al. 2022. Progression of macular atrophy in patients receiving long-term anti-VEGF therapy for age-related macular degeneration: real-life data. Ophthalmologica 245:152−160

doi: 10.1159/000520595
[7]

Fleckenstein M, Schmitz-Valckenberg S, Chakravarthy U. 2024. Age-related macular degeneration: a review. JAMA 331:147

doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.26074
[8]

Mangione CM. 2001. Development of the 25-list-item national eye institute visual function questionnaire. Archives of Ophthalmology 119:1050

doi: 10.1001/archopht.119.7.1050
[9]

Suñer IJ, Kokame GT, Yu E, Ward J, Dolan C, et al. 2009. Responsiveness of NEI VFQ-25 to changes in visual acuity in neovascular AMD: validation studies from two phase 3 clinical trials. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science 50:3629

doi: 10.1167/iovs.08-3225
[10]

Lee H, Jo A, Kim HC. 2017. Three-dimensional analysis of morphologic changes and visual outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science 58:1337

doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-20637
[11]

Berni A, Oakley JD, Dolz-Marco R, Gallego-Pinazo R, Cimorosi F, et al. 2025. Topographical quantification of retinal fluid in type 3 MNV and associations with short-term visual outcomes. American Journal of Ophthalmology 269:181−188

doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.08.024
[12]

Dansingani KK, Tan ACS, Gilani F, Phasukkijwatana N, Novais E, et al. 2016. Subretinal hyperreflective material imaged with optical coherence tomography angiography. American Journal of Ophthalmology 169:235−248

doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.06.031
[13]

Shah VP, Shah SA, Mrejen S, Freund KB. 2014. Subretinal hyperreflective exudation associated with neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Retina 34:1281−1288

doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000166
[14]

Willoughby AS, Ying GS, Toth CA, Maguire MG, Burns RE, et al. 2015. Subretinal hyperreflective material in the comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials. Ophthalmology 122:1846−1853.e5

doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.05.042
[15]

Kawashima Y, Hata M, Oishi A, Ooto S, Yamashiro K, et al. 2017. Association of vascular versus avascular subretinal hyperreflective material with aflibercept response in age-related macular degeneration. American Journal of Ophthalmology 181:61−70

doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.06.015
[16]

Pu J, Zhuang X, Li M, Hao X, He G, et al. 2025. Early fluctuations of exudative lesions as predictors of two-year clinical outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Translational Vision Science & Technology 14:1

doi: 10.1167/tvst.14.10.1
[17]

Pu J, Zhuang X, Li M, Zhang X, Ji Y, et al. 2026. Association between early lesion response and long-term anti-VEGF injection frequency in nAMD: a 2-year prospective study using 3D volumetric analysis. British Journal of Ophthalmology 110:67−75

doi: 10.1136/bjo-2025-327339
[18]

Pu J, Zhuang X, Li M, Zhang X, Su Y, et al. 2024. Analyzing formation and absorption of avascular subretinal hyperreflective material in nAMD from OCTA-based insights. American Journal of Ophthalmology 267:192−203

doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.06.019
[19]

Zhuang X, Pu J, Li M, Mi L, Zhang X, et al. 2024. Association between three-dimensional morphological features and functional indicators of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Microvascular Research 155:104716

doi: 10.1016/j.mvr.2024.104716
[20]

Bressler NM, Chang TS, Suñer IJ, Fine JT, Dolan CM, et al. 2010. Vision-related function after ranibizumab treatment by better- or worse-seeing eye clinical trial results from MARINA and ANCHOR. Ophthalmology 117:747−756.e4

doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.09.002
[21]

Hirneiss C. 2014. The impact of a better-seeing eye and a worse-seeing eye on vision-related quality of life. Clinical Ophthalmology 2014:1703−1709

doi: 10.2147/opth.s64200
[22]

Spaide RF, Jaffe GJ, Sarraf D, Freund KB, Sadda SR, et al. 2020. Consensus nomenclature for reporting neovascular age-related macular degeneration data consensus on neovascular age-related macular degeneration nomenclature study group. Ophthalmology 127:616−636

doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.11.004
[23]

Ehlers JP, Lunasco LM, Yordi S, Cetin H, Le TK, et al. 2024. Compartmental exudative dynamics in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: volumetric outcomes and impact of volatility in a phase III clinical trial. Ophthalmology Retina 8:765−777

doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2024.02.010
[24]

Toth CA, Tai V, Pistilli M, Chiu SJ, Winter KP, et al. 2019. Distribution of OCT features within areas of macular atrophy or scar after 2 years of anti-VEGF treatment for neovascular AMD in CATT. Ophthalmology Retina 3:316−325

doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2018.11.011
[25]

Sadda S, Sarraf D, Khanani AM, Tadayoni R, Chang AA, et al. 2024. Comparative assessment of subretinal hyper-reflective material in patients treated with brolucizumab versus aflibercept in HAWK and HARRIER. The British Journal of Ophthalmology 108:852−858

doi: 10.1136/bjo-2023-323577
[26]

Kumar JB, Stinnett S, Han JIL, Jaffe GJ. 2020. Correlation of subretinal hyperreflective material morphology and visual acuity in neovascular age-related macular degeneration. Retina 40:845−856

doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002552
[27]

Strauss O. 2005. The retinal pigment epithelium in visual function. Physiological Reviews 85:845−881

doi: 10.1152/physrev.00021.2004
[28]

Curcio CA, Sloan KR, Kalina RE, Hendrickson AE. 1990. Human photoreceptor topography. Journal of Comparative Neurology 292:497−523

doi: 10.1002/cne.902920402
[29]

Orr P, Rentz AM, Margolis MK, Revicki DA, Dolan CM, et al. 2011. Validation of the national eye institute visual function questionnaire-25 (NEI VFQ-25) in age-related macular degeneration. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science 52:3354

doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-5645
[30]

Roberts PK, Zotter S, Montuoro A, Pircher M, Baumann B, et al. 2019. Identification and quantification of the angiofibrotic switch in neovascular AMD. Investigative Opthalmology & Visual Science 60:304

doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-25189
[31]

Llorente-González S, Hernandez M, González-Zamora J, Bilbao-Malavé V, Fernández-Robredo P, et al. 2022. The role of retinal fluid location in atrophy and fibrosis evolution of patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration long-term treated in real world. Acta Ophthalmologica 100:e521−e531

doi: 10.1111/aos.14905
[32]

Sivaprasad S, Tschosik E, Kapre A, Varma R, Bressler NM, et al. 2018. Reliability and construct validity of the NEI VFQ-25 in a subset of patients with geographic atrophy from the phase 2 mahalo study. American Journal of Ophthalmology 190:1−8

doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.03.006