[1]

Takahashi H, Pradal C. 2021. Root phenotyping: important and minimum information required for root modeling in crop plants. Breeding Science 71(1):109−116

doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.20126
[2]

Sato EM, Hijazi H, Bennett MJ, Vissenberg K, Swarup R. 2015. New insights into root gravitropic signalling. Journal of Experimental Botany 66(8):2155−2165

doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru515
[3]

Voss-Fels KP, Snowdon RJ, Hickey LT. 2018. Designer roots for future crops. Trends in Plant Science 23(11):957−960

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.08.004
[4]

Zhan A, Schneider H, Lynch JP. 2015. Reduced lateral root branching density improves drought tolerance in maize. Plant Physiology 168(4):1603−1615

doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00187
[5]

Zhang Z, Fan B, Song C, Zhang X, Zhao Q, et al. 2022. Advances in root system architecture: functionality, plasticity, and research methods. Journal of Resources and Ecology 14(1):15−24

doi: 10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2023.01.002
[6]

Li B, Zhang X, Morita S, Sekiya N, Araki H, et al. 2022. Are crop deep roots always beneficial for combating drought: a review of root structure and function, regulation and phenotyping. Agricultural Water Management 271:107781

doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107781
[7]

Xiong Y, Song X, Mehra P, Yu S, Li Q, et al. 2025. ABA-auxin cascade regulates crop root angle in response to drought. Current Biology 35(3):542−553.e4

doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2024.12.003
[8]

Han S, Wang Y, Li Y, Zhu R, Gu Y, et al. 2024. The OsNAC41-RoLe1-OsAGAP module promotes root development and drought resistance in upland rice. Molecular Plant 17(10):1573−1593

doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2024.09.002
[9]

Karlova R, Boer D, Hayes S, Testerink C. 2021. Root plasticity under abiotic stress. Plant Physiology 187(3):1057−1070

doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab392
[10]

Kücke M, Schmid H, Spiess A. 1995. A comparison of four methods for measuring roots of field crops in three contrasting soils. Plant and Soil 172(1):63−71

doi: 10.1007/BF00020860
[11]

McGrail RK, Van Sanford DA, McNear Jr DH. 2020. Trait-based root phenotyping as a necessary tool for crop selection and improvement. Agronomy 10(9):1328

doi: 10.3390/agronomy10091328
[12]

Trachsel S, Kaeppler SM, Brown KM, Lynch JP. 2011. Shovelomics: high throughput phenotyping of maize (Zea mays L.) root architecture in the field. Plant and Soil 341:75−87

doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0623-8
[13]

Sabety J, Serrano A, Khan A. 2024. A root system architecture measurement pipeline for apple rootstocks. The Plant Phenome Journal 7:e70011

doi: 10.1002/ppj2.70011
[14]

Fang S, Yan X, Liao H. 2009. 3D reconstruction and dynamic modeling of root architecture in situ and its application to crop phosphorus research. The Plant Journal 60:1096−1108

doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.04009.x
[15]

Pang W, Crow W, Luc J, McSorley R, Giblin-Davis R, et al. 2011. Comparison of water displacement and WinRHIZO software for plant root parameter assessment. Plant Disease 95:1308−1310

doi: 10.1094/PDIS-01-11-0026
[16]

Stingaciu L, Schulz H, Pohlmeier A, Behnke S, Zilken H, et al. 2013. In situ root system architecture extraction from magnetic resonance imaging for water uptake modeling. Vadose Zone Journal 12(1):1−9

doi: 10.2136/vzj2012.0019
[17]

Mairhofer S, Zappala S, Tracy SR, Sturrock C, Bennett M, et al. 2012. RooTrak: automated recovery of three-dimensional plant root architecture in soil from X-ray microcomputed tomography images using visual tracking. Plant physiology 158(2):561−569

doi: 10.1104/pp.111.186221
[18]

Rogers ED, Monaenkova D, Mijar M, Nori A, Goldman DI, et al. 2016. X-ray computed tomography reveals the response of root system architecture to soil texture. Plant Physiology 171(3):2028−2040

doi: 10.1104/pp.16.00397
[19]

Michels V, Chou C, Weigand M, Wu Y, Kemna A. 2024. Quantitative phenotyping of crop roots with spectral electrical impedance tomography: a rhizotron study with optimized measurement design. Plant Methods 20(1):118

doi: 10.1186/s13007-024-01247-7
[20]

Chang SJ, Chowdhry R, Song Y, Mejia T, Hampton A, et al. 2024. HyperPRI: a dataset of hyperspectral images for underground plant root study. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 225:109307

doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2024.109307
[21]

Yu Q, Zhang M, Wang L, Liu X, Zhu L, et al. 2025. Research on fine-grained phenotypic analysis of temporal root systems-improved YoloV8seg applied for fine-grained analysis of in situ root temporal phenotypes. Advanced Science 12(5):2408144

doi: 10.1002/advs.202408144
[22]

Itoh S. 1985. In situ measurement of rooting density by micro-rhizotron. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition 31(4):653−656

doi: 10.1080/00380768.1985.10557473
[23]

Majdi H. 1996. Root sampling methods-applications and limitations of the minirhizotron technique. Plant and Soil 185(2):255−258

doi: 10.1007/BF02257530
[24]

Arnaud M, Baird AJ, Morris PJ, Harris A, Huck JJ. 2019. EnRoot: a narrow-diameter, inexpensive and partially 3D-printable minirhizotron for imaging fine root production. Plant Methods 15(1):101

doi: 10.1186/s13007-019-0489-6
[25]

Ohashi AYP, Pires RdM, Silva A, dos Santos L, Matsura EE. 2019. Minirhizotron as an in-situ tool for assessing sugarcane root system growth and distribution. Agricultural Research and Technology 22:556182

doi: 10.19080/artoaj.2019.21.556182
[26]

Rajurkar AB, McCoy SM, Ruhter J, Mulcrone J, Freyfogle L, et al. 2022. Installation and imaging of thousands of minirhizotrons to phenotype root systems of field-grown plants. Plant Methods 18:39

doi: 10.1186/s13007-022-00874-2
[27]

Dalton F. 1995. In-situ root extent measurements by electrical capacitance methods. Plant and Soil 173:157−165

doi: 10.1007/BF00155527
[28]

Corona-Lopez DD, Sommer S, Rolfe SA, Podd F, Grieve BD. 2019. Electrical impedance tomography as a tool for phenotyping plant roots. Plant Methods 15:49

doi: 10.1186/s13007-019-0438-4
[29]

Garbout A, Munkholm LJ, Hansen SB, Petersen BM, Munk OL, Pajor R. 2012. The use of PET/CT scanning technique for 3D visualization and quantification of real-time soil/plant interactions. Plant and Soil 352:113−127

doi: 10.1007/s11104-011-0983-8
[30]

Metzner R, Eggert A, van Dusschoten D, Pflugfelder D, Gerth S, et al. 2015. Direct comparison of MRI and X-ray CT technologies for 3D imaging of root systems in soil: potential and challenges for root trait quantification. Plant Methods 11:17

doi: 10.1186/s13007-015-0060-z
[31]

Yan X, Wang Y, Song X, Xiang Z, Du T, Cheng Q. 2024. Development of a pipeline robot for high-throughput monitoring plant root characteristics and soil moisture in root zone. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering 40:192−202

doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129526
[32]

Abràmoff MD, Magalhães PJ, Ram SJ. 2004. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International 11:36−42

[33]

Çiçek Ö, Abdulkadir A, Lienkamp SS, Brox T, Ronneberger O. 2016. 3D U-Net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. Proceeding medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention–MICCAI 2016: 19th international conference, Athens, Greece, October 17–21, 2016, Proceedings, Part II 19. Springer. pp. 424–432 doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_49

[34]

Lobet G, Draye X, Périlleux C. 2013. An online database for plant image analysis software tools. Plant Methods 9:38

doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-9-38
[35]

Bucciarelli B, Xu Z, Ao S, Cao Y, Monteros MJ, et al. 2021. Phenotyping seedlings for selection of root system architecture in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.). Plant Methods 17:125

doi: 10.1186/s13007-021-00825-3
[36]

Fahlgren N, Gehan MA, Baxter I. 2015. Lights, camera, action: high-throughput plant phenotyping is ready for a close-up. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 24:93−99

doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.02.006
[37]

Rinehart B, Poffenbarger H, Lau D, McNear D. 2022. A method for phenotyping roots of large plants. The Plant Phenome Journal 5:e20041

doi: 10.1002/ppj2.20041
[38]

Lobet G, Pagès L, Draye X. 2011. A novel image-analysis toolbox enabling quantitative analysis of root system architecture. Plant Physiology 157:29−39

doi: 10.1104/pp.111.179895
[39]

Pound MP, French AP, Atkinson JA, Wells DM, Bennett MJ, et al. 2013. RootNav: navigating images of complex root architectures. Plant Physiology 162(4):1802−1814

doi: 10.1104/pp.113.221531
[40]

Pierret A, Gonkhamdee S, Jourdan C, Maeght JL. 2013. IJ_Rhizo: an open-source software to measure scanned images of root samples. Plant and Soil 373:531−539

doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1795-9
[41]

Betegón-Putze I, Gonzalez A, Sevillano X, Blasco-Escámez D, Caño-Delgado AI. 2019. My ROOT: a method and software for the semiautomatic measurement of primary root length in Arabidopsis seedlings. The Plant Journal 98(6):1145−1156

doi: 10.1111/tpj.14297
[42]

Armengaud P, Zambaux K, Hills A, Sulpice R, Pattison RJ, et al. 2009. EZ-Rhizo: integrated software for the fast and accurate measurement of root system architecture. The Plant Journal 57(5):945−956

doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03739.x
[43]

Galkovskyi T, Mileyko Y, Bucksch A, Moore B, Symonova O, et al. 2012. GiA Roots: software for the high throughput analysis of plant root system architecture. BMC Plant Biology 12:116

doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-116
[44]

Das A, Schneider H, Burridge J, Ascanio AKM, Wojciechowski T, et al. 2015. Digital imaging of root traits (DIRT): a high-throughput computing and collaboration platform for field-based root phenomics. Plant Methods 11:51

doi: 10.1186/s13007-015-0093-3
[45]

Zheng Z, Hey S, Jubery T, Liu H, Yang Y, et al. 2020. Shared genetic control of root system architecture between Zea mays and Sorghum bicolor. Plant Physiology 182:977−991

doi: 10.1104/pp.19.00752
[46]

Sordo Z, Andeer P, Sethian J, Northen T, Ushizima D. 2024. RhizoNet segments plant roots to assess biomass and growth for enabling self-driving labs. Scientific Reports 14:12907

doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-63497-8
[47]

Teramoto S, Uga Y. 2025. Detection of quantitative trait loci for rice root systems grown in paddies based on nondestructive phenotyping using X-ray computed tomography. The Plant Journal 121:e17171

doi: 10.1111/tpj.17171
[48]

Seethepalli A, Ottley C, Childs J, Cope KR, Fine AK, et al. 2024. Divide and conquer: using RhizoVision explorer to aggregate data from multiple root scans using image concatenation and statistical methods. New Phytologist 244(5):2101−2108

doi: 10.1111/nph.20151
[49]

van Dusschoten D, Metzner R, Kochs J, Postma JA, Pflugfelder D, et al. 2016. Quantitative 3D analysis of plant roots growing in soil using magnetic resonance imaging. Plant Physiology 170(3):1176−1188

doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01388
[50]

Clark RT, MacCurdy RB, Jung JK, Shaff JE, McCouch SR, et al. 2011. Three-dimensional root phenotyping with a novel imaging and software platform. Plant Physiology 156(2):455−465

doi: 10.1104/pp.110.169102
[51]

Smith AG, Han E, Petersen J, Olsen NAF, Giese C, et al. 2022. RootPainter: deep learning segmentation of biological images with corrective annotation. New Phytologist 236(2):774−791

doi: 10.1111/nph.18387
[52]

Zhao H, Wang N, Sun H, Zhu L, Zhang K, et al. 2022. RhizoPot platform: a high-throughput in situ root phenotyping platform with integrated hardware and software. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:1004904

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1004904
[53]

Deng W, Zhang J, Huang J, Li H, Han Z, et al. 2025. HTPRootSlides: a high-throughput phenotyping platform for crop root germination dynamic screening. The Crop Journal 14(2):662−672

doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2025.10.014
[54]

Gehan MA, Fahlgren N, Abbasi A, Berry JC, Callen ST, et al. 2017. PlantCV v2: image analysis software for high-throughput plant phenotyping. PeerJ 5:e4088

doi: 10.7717/peerj.4088
[55]

Yasrab R, Atkinson JA, Wells DM, French AP, Pridmore TP, et al. 2019. RootNav 2.0: deep learning for automatic navigation of complex plant root architectures. GigaScience 8(11):giz123

doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giz123
[56]

Baker DN, Selzner T, Göbbert JH, Scharr H, Riedel M, et al. 2025. VRoot: a VR-based application for manual root system architecture reconstruction. Plant Phenomics 7(2):100013

doi: 10.1101/2024.06.13.598253
[57]

Dadi M, Lumini A, Franco A. 2025. RootEx: an automated method for barley root system extraction and evaluation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 230:110030

doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2025.110030
[58]

Phalempin M, Lippold E, Vetterlein D, Schlüter S. 2021. An improved method for the segmentation of roots from X-ray computed tomography 3D images: Rootine v.2. Plant Methods 17:39

doi: 10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-5225
[59]

Matese A, Czarnecki JMP, Samiappan S, Moorhead R. 2024. Are unmanned aerial vehicle-based hyperspectral imaging and machine learning advancing crop science? Trends in Plant Science 29(2):196−209

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2023.09.001
[60]

Kinose R, Utsumi Y, Iwamura M, Kise K. 2023. Tiller estimation method using deep neural networks. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:1016507

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1016507
[61]

Juárez ID, Kurouski D. 2024. Contemporary applications of vibrational spectroscopy in plant stresses and phenotyping. Frontiers in Plant Science 15:1411859

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1411859
[62]

Jafar A, Bibi N, Naqvi RA, Sadeghi-Niaraki A, Jeong D. 2024. Revolutionizing agriculture with artificial intelligence: plant disease detection methods, applications, and their limitations. Frontiers in Plant Science 15:1356260

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1356260
[63]

Chen G, Huang S, Cao L, Chen H, Wang X, Lu Y. 2022. Application of plant phenotype extraction using virtual data with deep learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2356:012039

doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/2356/1/012039
[64]

Selvaraj MG, Vergara A, Ruiz H, Safari N, Elayabalan S, et al. 2019. AI-powered banana diseases and pest detection. Plant Methods 15:92

doi: 10.1186/s13007-019-0475-z
[65]

Xia X, Peng L, Wen Z. 2024. Detection of real-time fine-grained plant disease based on improved YOLOv8 algorithm. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization 45(5):188−194

doi: 10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2024.05.029
[66]

Dai G, Tian Z, Fan J, Sunil C, Dewi C. 2024. DFN-PSAN: multi-level deep information feature fusion extraction network for interpretable plant disease classification. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 216:108481

doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2023.108481
[67]

Weihs BJ, Heuschele DJ, Tang Z, York LM, Zhang Z, Xu Z. 2024. The state of the art in root system architecture image analysis using artificial intelligence: a review. Plant Phenomics 6:178

doi: 10.34133/plantphenomics.0178
[68]

Lu Y, Chen D, Olaniyi E, Huang Y. 2022. Generative adversarial networks (GANs) for image augmentation in agriculture: a systematic review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 200:107208

doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2022.107208
[69]

Douarre C, Schielein R, Frindel C, Gerth S, Rousseau D. 2016. Deep learning based root-soil segmentation from X-ray tomography images. BioRxiv Preprint: 071662

doi: 10.1101/071662
[70]

Soltaninejad M, Sturrock CJ, Griffiths M, Pridmore TP, Pound MP. 2020. Three dimensional root CT segmentation using multi-resolution encoder-decoder networks. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 29:6667−6679

doi: 10.1109/TIP.2020.2992893
[71]

Weihs BJ, Tang Z, Tian Z, Heuschele DJ, Siddique A, et al. 2024. Phenotyping alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) root structure architecture via integrating confident machine learning with ResNet-18. Plant Phenomics 6:251

doi: 10.34133/plantphenomics.0251
[72]

Li Y, Huang Y, Wang M, Zhao Y. 2023. An improved U-Net-based in situ root system phenotype segmentation method for plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 14:1115713

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1115713
[73]

Huang Y, Yan J, Zhang Y, Ye W, Zhang C, et al. 2023. Automatic segmentation of cotton roots in high-resolution minirhizotron images based on improved OCRNet. Frontiers in Plant Science 14:1147034

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1147034
[74]

Khoroshevsky F, Zhou K, Bar-Hillel A, Hadar O, Rachmilevitch S, et al. 2024. A CNN-based framework for estimation of root length, diameter, and color from in situ minirhizotron images. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 227:109457

doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2024.109457
[75]

Hui T, Ming W, Qiushi Y, Jiaxi Z, Liantao L, Nan W. 2023. Root image segmentation method based on improved UNet and transfer learning. Smart Agriculture 5:96

doi: 10.12133/j.smartag.SA202308003
[76]

Yu Q, Wang J, Tang H, Zhang J, Zhang W, et al. 2023. Application of improved UNet and EnglightenGAN for segmentation and reconstruction of in situ roots. Plant Phenomics 5:66

doi: 10.34133/plantphenomics.0066
[77]

Shen C, Liu L, Zhu L, Kang J, Wang N, Shao L. 2020. High-throughput in situ root image segmentation based on the improved DeepLabv3+ method. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:576791

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.576791
[78]

Baykalov P, Bussmann B, Nair R, Smith AG, Bodner G, et al. 2023. Semantic segmentation of plant roots from RGB (mini-) rhizotron images—generalisation potential and false positives of established methods and advanced deep-learning models. Plant Methods 19:122

doi: 10.1186/s13007-023-01101-2
[79]

Lu W, Wang X, Jia W. 2022. Root hair image processing based on deep learning and prior knowledge. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 202:107397

doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2022.107397
[80]

LeCun Y, Bottou L, Bengio Y, Haffner P. 1998. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE 86:2278−2324

doi: 10.1109/5.726791
[81]

Long J, Shelhamer E, Darrell T. 2015. Fully convolutional networks for semantic segmentation. Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. June 7–12, 2015, Boston, MA, USA. pp. 3431–3440 doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298965

[82]

Kang J, Liu L, Zhang F, Shen C, Wang N, Shao L. 2021. Semantic segmentation model of cotton roots in-situ image based on attention mechanism. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 189:106370

doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2021.106370
[83]

Narisetti N, Henke M, Seiler C, Junker A, Ostermann J, et al. 2021. Fully-automated root image analysis (faRIA). Scientific Reports 11:16047

doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95480-y
[84]

Peters B, Blume-Werry G, Gillert A, Schwieger S, von Lukas UF, Kreyling J. 2023. As good as human experts in detecting plant roots in minirhizotron images but efficient and reproducible: the convolutional neural network "RootDetector" . Scientific Reports 13:1399

doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28400-x
[85]

Akhtar MS, Zafar Z, Nawaz R, Fraz MM. 2024. Unlocking plant secrets: a systematic review of 3D imaging in plant phenotyping techniques. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 222:109033

doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2024.109033
[86]

Wang RF, Qu HR, Su WH. 2025. From sensors to insights: technological trends in image-based high-throughput plant phenotyping. Smart Agricultural Technology 12:101257

doi: 10.1016/j.atech.2025.101257
[87]

Pierret A, Doussan C, Garrigues E, Mc Kirby J. 2003. Observing plant roots in their environment: current imaging options and specific contribution of two-dimensional approaches. Agronomie 23:471−479

doi: 10.1051/agro:2003019
[88]

Topp CN, Iyer-Pascuzzi AS, Anderson JT, Lee CR, Zurek PR, et al. 2013. 3D phenotyping and quantitative trait locus mapping identify core regions of the rice genome controlling root architecture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110:E1695−E1704

doi: 10.1073/pnas.1304354110
[89]

Ziyun X, Xiwen L, Xuecheng Z, Xiaolong Y, Liangping L, Xiangsheng Z. 2006. Experimental study on observation of original shape of crop root system with multi helical CT technology. CT Theory and Applications 15:1−5

doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-4140.2006.03.001
[90]

Leitner D, Klepsch S, Bodner G, Schnepf A. 2010. A dynamic root system growth model based on L-systems: tropisms and coupling to nutrient uptake from soil. Plant and Soil 332:177−192

doi: 10.1007/s11104-010-0284-7
[91]

Delory BM, Baudson C, Brostaux Y, Lobet G, Du Jardin P, et al. 2016. archiDART: an R package for the automated computation of plant root architectural traits. Plant and Soil 398:351−365

doi: 10.1007/s11104-015-2673-4
[92]

Han TH, Kuo YF. 2018. Developing a system for three-dimensional quantification of root traits of rice seedlings. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 152:90−100

doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.07.001
[93]

Gerth S, Claußen J, Eggert A, Wörlein N, Waininger M, et al. 2021. Semiautomated 3D root segmentation and evaluation based on X-ray CT imagery. Plant Phenomics 2021:8747930

doi: 10.34133/2021/8747930
[94]

Lu Y, Wang Y, Chen Z, Khan A, Salvaggio C, et al. 2021. 3D plant root system reconstruction based on fusion of deep structure-from-motion and IMU. Multimedia Tools and Applications 80:17315−17331

doi: 10.1007/s11042-020-10069-3
[95]

Alani AM, Lantini L. 2020. Recent advances in tree root mapping and assessment using non-destructive testing methods: a focus on ground penetrating radar. Surveys in Geophysics 41:605−646

doi: 10.1007/s10712-019-09548-6
[96]

Pflugfelder D, Kochs J, Koller R, Jahnke S, Mohl C, et al. 2022. The root system architecture of wheat establishing in soil is associated with varying elongation rates of seminal roots: quantification using 4D magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Experimental Botany 73:2050−2060

doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab551
[97]

Wieland R, Ukawa C, Joschko M, Krolczyk A, Fritsch G, et al. 2021. Use of deep learning for structural analysis of computer tomography images of soil samples. Royal Society Open Science 8:201275

doi: 10.1098/rsos.201275
[98]

Liu S, Barrow CS, Hanlon M, Lynch JP, Bucksch A. 2021. DIRT/3D: 3D root phenotyping for field-grown maize (Zea mays). Plant Physiology 187(2):739−757

doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab311
[99]

Feeney DS, Crawford JW, Daniell T, Hallett PD, Nunan N, et al. 2006. Three-dimensional microorganization of the soil–root–microbe system. Microbial Ecology 52:151−158

doi: 10.1007/s00248-006-9062-8
[100]

Kurogane T, Tamaoki D, Yano S, Tanigaki F, Shimazu T, et al. 2021. Visualization of Arabidopsis root system architecture in 3D by refraction-contrast X-ray micro-computed tomography. Microscopy 70(6):536−544

doi: 10.1093/jmicro/dfab027
[101]

Wang Z, Yung WS, Gao Y, Huang C, Zhao X, et al. 2024. From phenotyping to genetic mapping: identifying water-stress adaptations in legume root traits. BMC Plant Biology 24:749

doi: 10.1186/s12870-024-05477-8
[102]

Colombi T, Kirchgessner N, Le Marié CA, York LM, Lynch JP, Hund A. 2015. Next generation shovelomics: set up a tent and REST. Plant and Soil 388:1−20

doi: 10.1007/s11104-015-2379-7
[103]

Kuijken RC, van Eeuwijk FA, Marcelis LF, Bouwmeester HJ. 2015. Root phenotyping: from component trait in the lab to breeding. Journal of Experimental Botany 66(18):5389−5401

doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv239
[104]

Dunbabin VM, Postma JA, Schnepf A, Pagès L, Javaux M, et al. 2013. Modelling root–soil interactions using three–dimensional models of root growth, architecture and function. Plant and Soil 372:93−124

doi: 10.1007/s11104-013-1769-y
[105]

Oyanagi A, Takahashi H, Suge H. 1995. Interactions between hydrotropism and gravitropism in the primary seminal roots of Triticum eastivum L. Annals of Botany 75:229−235

doi: 10.1006/anbo.1995.1016
[106]

Duan L, Fu J, Wang X, Shi J, Li W, et al. 2024. In-situ measurement and analysis of drought-related wheat root phenotypic traits. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery 55(5):207−217

doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2024.05.019
[107]

Gao J, Zhang Y, Xu C, Wang P, Huang S, Lv Y. 2024. Enhancing spatial and temporal coordination of soil water and root growth to improve maize (Zea mays L.) yield. Agricultural Water Management 294:108728

doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108728
[108]

St Aime R, Rhodes G, Jones M, Campbell BT, Narayanan S. 2021. Evaluation of root traits and water use efficiency of different cotton genotypes in the presence or absence of a soil-hardpan. The Crop Journal 9(4):945−953

doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2020.12.001
[109]

Bacher H, Sharaby Y, Walia H, Peleg Z. 2022. Modifying root-to-shoot ratio improves root water influxes in wheat under drought stress. Journal of Experimental Botany 73(5):1643−1654

doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab500
[110]

Wu L, Quan H, Wu L, Zhang X, Ding D, et al. 2024. Plastic mulching enhances maize yield and water productivity by improving root characteristics, green leaf area, and photosynthesis for different cultivars in dryland regions. Agricultural Water Management 305:109105

doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109105
[111]

Kang J, Ding R, Chen J, Wu S, Gao W, et al. 2025. Crop root system phenotyping with high water-use efficiency and its targeted sprecision regulation: present and prospect. Agricultural Water Management 309:109327

doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2025.109327
[112]

Sun S, Li B, Shi J, Xia L, Wang H, et al. 2025. Root architecture plasticity in response to drought stress in cotton revealed by a high-throughput automatic root phenotyping platform (HT-ARPP). Journal of Integrative Agriculture Preprint: 2025.09.022

doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2025.09.022
[113]

Gupta A, Rico-Medina A, Caño-Delgado AI. 2020. The physiology of plant responses to drought. Science 368:266−269

doi: 10.1126/science.aaz7614
[114]

Liu X, Li R, Chang X, Jing R. 2013. Mapping QTLs for seedling root traits in a doubled haploid wheat population under different water regimes. Euphytica 189:51−66

doi: 10.1007/s10681-012-0690-4
[115]

Voss-Fels KP, Robinson H, Mudge SR, Richard C, Newman S, et al. 2018. VERNALIZATION1 modulates root system architecture in wheat and barley. Molecular Plant 11:226−229

doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.10.005
[116]

Uga Y, Sugimoto K, Ogawa S, Rane J, Ishitani M, et al. 2013. Control of root system architecture by DEEPER ROOTING 1 increases rice yield under drought conditions. Nature genetics 45(9):1097−1102

doi: 10.1038/ng.2725
[117]

Christopher J, Christopher M, Jennings R, Jones S, Fletcher S, et al. 2013. QTL for root angle and number in a population developed from bread wheats (Triticum aestivum) with contrasting adaptation to water-limited environments. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 126(6):1563−1574

doi: 10.1007/s00122-013-2074-0
[118]

Griffin AJ, Jungers JM, Bajgain P. 2025. Root phenotyping and plant breeding of crops for enhanced ecosystem services. Crop Science 65:e21315

doi: 10.1002/csc2.21315
[119]

Tang H, Cheng X, Yu Q, Zhang J, Wang N, Liu L. 2024. Improved transformer for time series senescence root recognition. Plant Phenomics 6:159

doi: 10.34133/plantphenomics.0159
[120]

Yu Q, Wang N, Tang H, Zhang J, Xu R, et al. 2024. In situ root dataset expansion strategy based on an improved CycleGAN generator. Plant Phenomics 6:148

doi: 10.34133/plantphenomics.0148