[1]

Renner SS. 2014. The relative and absolute frequencies of angiosperm sexual systems: dioecy, monoecy, gynodioecy, and an updated online database. American Journal of Botany 101:1588−1596

doi: 10.3732/ajb.1400196
[2]

Heilbuth JC. 2000. Lower species richness in dioecious clades. The American Naturalist 156:221−241

doi: 10.1086/303389
[3]

Chen J, Li CY. 2014. Sex-specific responses to environmental stresses and sexual competition of dioecious plants. Chinese Journal of Applied and Environmental Biology 20:743−750

doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1145.2014.06008
[4]

Petry WK, Soule JD, Iler AM, Chicas-Mosier A, Inouye DW, et al. 2016. Sex-specific responses to climate change in plants alter population sex ratio and performance. Science 353:69−71

doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2588
[5]

Hultine KR, Burtch KG, Ehleringer JR. 2013. Gender specific patterns of carbon uptake and water use in a dominant riparian tree species exposed to a warming climate. Global Change Biology 19:3390−3405

doi: 10.1111/gcb.12230
[6]

Obeso JR. 2002. The costs of reproduction in plants. The New Phytologist 155:320−348

doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2002.00477.x
[7]

Deng B, Wang YD, Ren WW, Wang XF, Zhang J, et al. 2026. Morphological and physiological responses of Salix variegata to heat stress, drought stress, and combined heat-drought stress: a sex-specific analysis. Trees-Structure and Function 40:25

doi: 10.1007/s00468-026-02730-5
[8]

Guo JJ, Gong XW, Hao GY. 2025. Leaf transpirational cooling and thermal tolerance vary along the spectrum of iso-anisohydric stomatal regulation in sand-fixing shrubs. Plant, Cell & Environment 48:2053−2066

doi: 10.1111/pce.15279
[9]

Juvany M, Munné-Bosch S. 2015. Sex-related differences in stress tolerance in dioecious plants: a critical appraisal in a physiological context. Journal of Experimental Botany 66:6083−6092

doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv343
[10]

Xu X, Yang F, Xiao XW, Zhang S, Korpelainen H, et al. 2008. Sex-specific responses of Populus cathayana to drought and elevated temperatures. Plant, Cell & Environment 31:850−860

doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01799.x
[11]

Yu L, Dai HX, Fang LD, Korpelainen H, Niinemets Ü, et al. 2025. Sex-specific non-structural carbohydrate variation and hydraulics explain differences in drought resistance of Populus euphratica females and males along an aridity gradient. Functional Ecology 39:2925−2939

doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.70160
[12]

Zhang S, Zhou R, Zhao HX, Korpelainen H, Li C, et al. 2016. iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomic analysis gives insight into sexually different metabolic processes of poplars under nitrogen and phosphorus deficiencies. Proteomics 16:614−628

doi: 10.1002/pmic.201500197
[13]

IPCC. 2023. Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC doi: 10.59327/ipcc/ar6-9789291691647.002
[14]

Gebrechorkos SH, Sheffield J, Vicente-Serrano SM, Funk C, Miralles DG, et al. 2025. Warming accelerates global drought severity. Nature 642:628−635

doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09047-2
[15]

Kim YJ, Yeh SW, Wang G, Ng B. 2026. Nonlinear increase of compound drought-heatwave events since the early 2000s. Science Advances 12:eaad3038

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aea3038
[16]

Dai A. 2013. Increasing drought under global warming in observations and models. Nature Climate Change 3:52−58

doi: 10.1038/nclimate1633
[17]

Doughty CE, Keany JM, Wiebe BC, Rey-Sanchez C, Carter KR, et al. 2023. Tropical forests are approaching critical temperature thresholds. Nature 621:105−111

doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06391-z
[18]

Geange SR, Arnold PA, Catling AA, Coast O, Cook AM, et al. 2021. The thermal tolerance of photosynthetic tissues: a global systematic review and agenda for future research. The New Phytologist 229:2497−2513

doi: 10.1111/nph.17052
[19]

Adams HD, Germino MJ, Breshears DD, Barron-Gafford GA, Guardiola-Claramonte M, et al. 2013. Nonstructural leaf carbohydrate dynamics of Pinus edulis during drought-induced tree mortality reveal role for carbon metabolism in mortality mechanism. The New Phytologist 197:1142−1151

doi: 10.1111/nph.12102
[20]

McDowell NG, Allen CD, Anderson-Teixeira K, Aukema BH, Bond-Lamberty B, et al. 2020. Pervasive shifts in forest dynamics in a changing world. Science 368:eaaz9463

doi: 10.1126/science.aaz9463
[21]

Anderegg WRL, Kane JM, Anderegg LDL. 2013. Consequences of widespread tree mortality triggered by drought and temperature stress. Nature Climate Change 3:30−36

doi: 10.1038/nclimate1635
[22]

Hartmann H, Moura CF, Anderegg WRL, Ruehr NK, Salmon Y, et al. 2018. Research frontiers for improving our understanding of drought-induced tree and forest mortality. The New Phytologist 218:15−28

doi: 10.1111/nph.15048
[23]

Sterck FJ, Song Y, Poorter L. 2024. Drought- and heat-induced mortality of conifer trees is explained by leaf and growth legacies. Science Advances 10:eadl4800

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adl4800
[24]

Hultine KR, Grady KC, Wood TE, Shuster SM, Stella JC, et al. 2016. Climate change perils for dioecious plant species. Nature Plants 2:16109

doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.109
[25]

Urban MC. 2015. Accelerating extinction risk from climate change. Science 348:571−573

doi: 10.1126/science.aaa4984
[26]

Dawson TE, Bliss LC. 1989. Patterns of water-use and the tissue water relations in the dioecious shrub, Salix arctica: the physiological basis for habitat partitioning between the sexes. Oecologia 79:332−343

doi: 10.1007/BF00384312
[27]

Ueno N, Suyama Y, Seiwa K. 2007. What makes the sex ratio female-biased in the dioecious tree Salix sachalinensis?. Journal of Ecology 95:951−959

doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2007.01269.x
[28]

Hughes FMR, Johansson M, Xiong S, Carlborg E, Hawkins D, et al. 2010. The influence of hydrological regimes on sex ratios and spatial segregation of the sexes in two dioecious riparian shrub species in northern Sweden. Plant Ecology 208:77−92

doi: 10.1007/s11258-009-9689-x
[29]

Lei YB, Chen K, Jiang H, Yu L, Duan BL. 2017. Contrasting responses in the growth and energy utilization properties of sympatric Populus and Salix to different altitudes: implications for sexual dimorphism in Salicaceae. Physiologia Plantarum 159:30−41

doi: 10.1111/ppl.12479
[30]

Liao J, Song HF, Tang DT, Zhang S. 2019. Sexually differential tolerance to water deficiency of Salix paraplesia—a female-biased alpine willow. Ecology and Evolution 9:8450−8464

doi: 10.1002/ece3.5175
[31]

Liu JY, Zhang R, Xu X, Fowler JC, Miller TEX, et al. 2020. Effect of summer warming on growth, photosynthesis and water status in female and male Populus cathayana: implications for sex-specific drought and heat tolerances. Tree Physiology 40:1178−1191

doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpaa069
[32]

Randriamanana TR, Lavola A, Julkunen-Tiitto R. 2015. Interactive effects of supplemental UV-B and temperature in European aspen seedlings: implications for growth, leaf traits, phenolic defense and associated organisms. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 93:84−93

doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.03.001
[33]

Sobuj N, Virjamo V, Zhang YD, Nybakken L, Julkunen-Tiitto R. 2018. Impacts of elevated temperature and CO2 concentration on growth and phenolics in the sexually dimorphic Populus tremula (L.). Environmental and Experimental Botany 146:34−44

doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.08.003
[34]

Dong TF, Zhang R, Liu JY, Fowler JC, Miller TEX, et al. 2021. Warming alters sex-specific responses in leaf defense against insect herbivory in Populus cathayana. Environmental and Experimental Botany 189:104557

doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2021.104557
[35]

Chen J, Liu Q, Yu L, Korpelainen H, Niinemets Ü, et al. 2021. Elevated temperature and CO2 interactively modulate sexual competition and ecophysiological responses of dioecious Populus cathayana. Forest Ecology and Management 481:118747

doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118747
[36]

Yu L, Han Y, Jiang YL, Dong TF, Lei YB. 2018. Sex-specific responses of bud burst and early development to nongrowing season warming and drought in Populus cathayana. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 48:68−76

doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2017-0259
[37]

Zhao HX, Li YP, Zhang XL, Korpelainen H, Li CY. 2012. Sex-related and stage-dependent source-to-sink transition in Populus cathayana grown at elevated CO2 and elevated temperature. Tree Physiology 32:1325−1338

doi: 10.1093/treephys/tps074
[38]

Li L, Duan BL, Deng DZ, Tu WG, Zhang YB. 2014. Soil salinity alters the sexual responses to elevated CO2 and temperature in growth and leaf traits of a dioecious plant. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 44:1292−1301

doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2013-0453
[39]

Fu MY, Liao J, Liu XJ, Li MH, Zhang S. 2023. Artificial warming affects sugar signals and flavonoid accumulation to improve female willows' growth faster than males. Tree Physiology 43:1584−1602

doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpad081
[40]

He Y, Guo Z, Liu RX, Li Q, He YT, et al. 2024. Enhancing temperature resilience in dioecious Salix myrtillacea: the role of acetic acid in eco-physiological and microbial adaptations. Industrial Crops and Products 218:118888

doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2024.118888
[41]

Su Y, Li SX, Jiang H, Duan BL, Liu MY, et al. 2023. Sex-specific physiological and growth responses to elevated temperature and CO2 concentration in Chinese seabuckthorn (Hippophae rhamnoides subsp. sinensis Rousi). Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 45:53

doi: 10.1007/s11738-023-03520-z
[42]

Jones MH, MacDonald SE, Henry GHR. 1999. Sex- and habitat-specific responses of a high arctic willow, Salix arctica, to experimental climate change. Oikos 87:129−138

doi: 10.2307/3547004
[43]

Randriamanana TR, Nissinen K, Moilanen J, Nybakken L, Julkunen-Tiitto R. 2015. Long-term UV-B and temperature enhancements suggest that females of Salix myrsinifolia plants are more tolerant to UV-B than males. Environmental and Experimental Botany 109:296−305

doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.06.007
[44]

Gozdur K, Ślesak I, Ślesak H. 2022. Photosynthetic and antioxidant activity in the sex-related heat stress response of the dioecious species Rumex thyrsiflorus Fingerh. Plant Growth Regulation 152(1):151−165

doi: 10.1007/s11240-022-02397-z
[45]

Xu X, Peng GQ, Wu CC, Korpelainen H, Li CY. 2008. Drought inhibits photosynthetic capacity more in females than in males of Populus cathayana. Tree Physiology 28:1751−1759

doi: 10.1093/treephys/28.11.1751
[46]

Han Y, Wang YH, Jiang H, Wang ML, Korpelainen H, et al. 2013. Reciprocal grafting separates the roles of the root and shoot in sex-related drought responses in Populus cathayana males and females. Plant, Cell & Environment 36:356−364

doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02578.x
[47]

Xia ZC, He Y, Zhou B, Korpelainen H, Li CY. 2020. Sex-related responses in rhizosphere processes of dioecious Populus cathayana exposed to drought and low phosphorus stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany 175:104049

doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.104049
[48]

Tang SL, Wu JN, Liu WJ, Wu CS, Yu L. 2026. Sex-specific hydraulic and anatomical strategies underpin differential drought and shade tolerance in Populus cathayana. Tree Physiology 46:tpag038

doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpag038
[49]

Chen LH, Zhang S, Zhao HX, Korpelainen H, Li CY. 2010. Sex-related adaptive responses to interaction of drought and salinity in Populus yunnanensis. Plant, Cell & Environment 33:1767−1778

doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2010.02182.x
[50]

Peng SM, Jiang H, Zhang S, Chen LH, Li XG, et al. 2012. Transcriptional profiling reveals sexual differences of the leaf transcriptomes in response to drought stress in Populus yunnanensis. Tree Physiology 32:1541−1555

doi: 10.1093/treephys/tps110
[51]

Lin TT, Tang JY, Li SY, Li SJ, Han S, et al. 2023. Drought stress-mediated differences in phyllosphere microbiome and associated pathogen resistance between male and female poplars. The Plant Journal 115:1100−1113

doi: 10.1111/tpj.16283
[52]

Lin TT, Wu ZQ, Shi YJ, Yang P, Wang T, et al. 2023. Male and female poplars exhibited sex-specific differences in metabolic and transcriptional responses to two levels of water deficit. Industrial Crops and Products 196:116441

doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2023.116441
[53]

Lu YW, Miao XL, Song QY, Peng SM, Duan BL. 2018. Morphological and ecophysiological plasticity in dioecious plant Populus tomentosa under drought and alkaline stresses. Photosynthetica 56:1353−1364

doi: 10.1007/s11099-018-0846-0
[54]

Chen FG, Gong Y, Liu SY, Wang YY, Luo LJ, et al. 2023. More effective protection supports male better than female siblings over water deficit in artificially bred poplar hybrids. Forests 14:995

doi: 10.3390/f14050995
[55]

Xia ZC, He Y, Zhu ZD, Korpelainen H, Li CY. 2022. Covariations and trade-offs of phosphorus (P) acquisition strategies in dioecious Populus euphratica as affected by soil water availability. Functional Ecology 36:3188−3199

doi: 10.1111/1365-2435.14193
[56]

Yu L, Huang ZD, Tang SL, Korpelainen H, Li CY. 2023. Populus euphratica males exhibit stronger drought and salt stress resistance than females. Environmental and Experimental Botany 205:105114

doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2022.105114
[57]

Liu M, Ye LY, Chen LL, Korpelainen H, Niinemets Ü, et al. 2024. Sex-specific phosphorus acquisition strategies and cycling in dioecious Populus euphratica forests along a natural water availability gradient. Plant, Cell & Environment 47:3266−3281

doi: 10.1111/pce.14951
[58]

Chen BB, Zhai JT, Sun JJ, Cui YF, Ali W, et al. 2026. Phyllosphere-specific fungal phylotypes enhance drought resistance to maintain functional stability in Populus euphratica. Plant and Soil 521:639−652

doi: 10.1007/s11104-026-08412-y
[59]

de Andrade Silva RD, Thomas BR. 2026. Family and sex-related responses of aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) seedlings to drought stress. Forest Ecology and Management 619:124064

doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2026.124064
[60]

Dawson TE, Ehleringer JR. 1993. Gender-specific physiology, carbon isotope discrimination, and habitat distribution in boxelder, Acer negundo. Ecology 74:798−815

doi: 10.2307/1940807
[61]

Dawson TE, Ward JK, Ehleringer JR. 2004. Temporal scaling of physiological responses from gas exchange to tree rings: a gender-specific study of Acer negundo (Boxelder) growing under different conditions. Functional Ecology 18:212−222

doi: 10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00838.x
[62]

Iszkuło G, Jasińska AK, Giertych MJ, Boratyński A. 2009. Do secondary sexual dimorphism and female intolerance to drought influence the sex ratio and extinction risk of Taxus baccata?. Plant Ecology 200:229−240

doi: 10.1007/s11258-008-9447-5
[63]

Rozas V, DeSoto L, Olano JM. 2009. Sex-specific, age-dependent sensitivity of tree-ring growth to climate in the dioecious tree Juniperus thurifera. The New Phytologist 182:687−697

doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.02770.x
[64]

Olano JM, González-Muñoz N, Arzac A, Rozas V, von Arx G, et al. 2017. Sex determines xylem anatomy in a dioecious conifer: hydraulic consequences in a drier world. Tree Physiology 37:1493−1502

doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpx066
[65]

Sánchez Vilas J, Hernández-Alonso H, Rozas V, Retuerto R. 2025. Differential growth rate, water-use efficiency and climate sensitivity between males and females of Ilex aquifolium in north-western Spain. Annals of Botany 135:357−370

doi: 10.1093/aob/mcae126
[66]

El Mujtar VA, Perdomo MH, Gallo LA, Grau O. 2012. Sex-related difference in susceptibility to cypress mortality in Austrocedrus chilensis from Northwestern Patagonia (Argentina). Bosque 33:221−226

doi: 10.4067/s0717-92002012000200012
[67]

Zhang CY, Chen MH, Liu G, Huang GQ, Wang Y, et al. 2020. Enhanced UV-B radiation aggravates negative effects more in females than in males of Morus alba saplings under drought stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany 169:103903

doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2019.103903
[68]

Garcia-Barreda S, Sangüesa-Barreda G, García-González MD, Camarero JJ. 2022. Sex and tree rings: females neither grow less nor are less water-use efficient than males in four dioecious tree species. Dendrochronologia 73:125944

doi: 10.1016/j.dendro.2022.125944
[69]

Retuerto R, Lema BF, Roiloa SR, Obeso JR. 2000. Gender, light and water effects in carbon isotope discrimination, and growth rates in the dioecious tree Ilex aquifolium. Functional Ecology 14:529−537

doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00454.x
[70]

He M, Shi DW, Wei XD, Hu Y, Wang T, et al. 2016. Gender-related differences in adaptability to drought stress in the dioecious tree Ginkgo biloba. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 38:124

doi: 10.1007/s11738-016-2148-0
[71]

Wang JW, Liu Y, Xu YX, Chen WJ, Han YN, et al. 2022. Sexual differences in gas exchange and chlorophyll fluorescence of Torreya grandis under drought stress. Trees 36:283−294

doi: 10.1007/s00468-021-02205-9
[72]

Gao M, Zhao YX, Chen YC, Wang YD. 2025. Drought stress drives sex-specific physiological and biochemical differences in female and male Litsea cubeba. Horticulturae 11:594

doi: 10.3390/horticulturae11060594
[73]

Beltrán-Rodríguez L, Romero-Manzanares A, Borja-de la Rosa MA, Valdez-Hernández JI, Luna-Cavazos M, et al. 2022. Adaptive advantages of wood anatomical-hydraulic features linked to sex in a tropical dioecious species. Trees 36:39−52

doi: 10.1007/s00468-021-02258-w
[74]

Gao LS, Zhang CY, Zhao XH, Gadow KV. 2010. Gender-related climate response of radial growth in dioecious Fraxinus mandshurica trees. Tree-Ring Research 66:105−112

doi: 10.3959/2009-5.1
[75]

Piraino S, Hadad MA, Ribas-Fernández YA, Roig FA. 2024. Sex-dependent resilience to extreme drought events: implications for climate change adaptation of a South American endangered tree species. Ecological Processes 13:24

doi: 10.1186/s13717-024-00505-9
[76]

Rodríguez-Ramírez EC, Terrazas T. 2025. Concatenating latewood blue intensity and wood anatomical sensitivity in Neotropical montane podocarps: how does sex-related climate trigger tracheid plasticity?. Dendrochronologia 90:126298

doi: 10.1016/j.dendro.2025.126298
[77]

Dudley LS. 2006. Ecological correlates of secondary sexual dimorphism in Salix glauca (Salicaceae). American Journal of Botany 93:1775−1783

doi: 10.3732/ajb.93.12.1775
[78]

Dudley LS, Galen C. 2007. Stage-dependent patterns of drought tolerance and gas exchange vary between sexes in the alpine willow, Salix glauca. Oecologia 153:1−9

doi: 10.1007/s00442-007-0712-4
[79]

Cai ZY, Fu MY, Yao Y, Chen Y, Song HF, et al. 2023. Differences in phytohormone and flavonoid metabolism explain the sex differences in responses of Salix rehderiana to drought and nitrogen deposition. The Plant Journal 114:534−553

doi: 10.1111/tpj.16152
[80]

He Y, Dai YJ, Li HH, Li MH, Zhang S. 2023. Growth and defense trade-offs in dioecious Salix myrtillacea exposed to drought and low temperature stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany 215:105504

doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2023.105504
[81]

Álvarez-Cansino L, Zunzunegui M, Díaz Barradas MC, Esquivias MP. 2010. Physiological performance and xylem water isotopic composition underlie gender-specific responses in the dioecious shrub Corema album. Physiologia Plantarum 140:32−45

doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2010.01382.x
[82]

Díaz-Barradas MC, Zunzunegui M, Correia O, Ain-Lhout F, Esquivias MP, et al. 2018. Gender dimorphism in Corema album across its biogeographical area and implications under a scenario of extreme drought events. Environmental and Experimental Botany 155:609−618

doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.08.011
[83]

Li CY, Ren J, Luo JX, Lu RS. 2004. Sex-specific physiological and growth responses to water stress in Hippophae rhamnoides L. populations. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 26:123−129

doi: 10.1007/s11738-004-0001-3
[84]

Juvany M, Müller M, Pintó-Marijuan M, Munné-Bosch S. 2014. Sex-related differences in lipid peroxidation and photoprotection in Pistacia lentiscus. Journal of Experimental Botany 65:1039−1049

doi: 10.1093/jxb/ert446
[85]

Amitrano C, Balzano A, Motti R, Merela M, De Micco V. 2025. Sex matters: understanding wood-leaf hydraulic coordination in dioecious species in a drying world. Tree Physiology 45:tpaf133

doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpaf133
[86]

del Carmen de la Bandera M, Traveset A, Valladares F, Gulías J. 2008. Gender, season and habitat: patterns of variation in photosynthetic activity, growth and fecundity in Thymelaea velutina. Acta Oecologica 34:294−302

doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2008.06.002
[87]

Houssard C, Escarré J, Vartanian N. 1992. Water-stress effects on successional populations of the dioecious herb, Rumex acetosella L. New Phytologist 120:551−559

doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1992.tb01805.x
[88]

Varga S, Kytöviita MM. 2008. Sex-specific responses to mycorrhiza in a dioecious species. American Journal of Botany 95:1225−1232

doi: 10.3732/ajb.0800068
[89]

Simancas B, Juvany M, Cotado A, Munné-Bosch S. 2016. Sex-related differences in photoinhibition, photo-oxidative stress and photoprotection in stinging nettle (Urtica dioica L.) exposed to drought and nutrient deficiency. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 156:22−28

doi: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.01.005
[90]

Gong CS, Wang J, Guo SM, Dong TF, Zhang CY. 2026. Sex-specific trade-offs of ecological strategies of Spinacia oleracea plants under intermittent drought stress. Flora 334:152892

doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2025.152892
[91]

Liu MY, Su YL, Teng K, Fan XF, Yue YS, et al. 2024. Transcriptome regulation mechanisms difference between female and male Buchloe dactyloides in response to drought stress and rehydration. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25:9653

doi: 10.3390/ijms25179653
[92]

Fox JF, Harrison AT. 1981. Habitat assortment of sexes and water-balance in a dioecious grass. Oecologia 49:233−235

doi: 10.1007/BF00349194
[93]

Yang J, Hu LJ, Wang ZK, Zhu WL, Meng LH. 2014. Responses to drought stress among sex morphs of Oxyria sinensis (Polygonaceae), a subdioecious perennial herb native to the East Himalayas. Ecology and Evolution 4:4033−4040

doi: 10.1002/ece3.1178
[94]

Freeman DC, Klikoff LG, Harper KT. 1976. Differential resource utilization by the sexes of dioecious plants. Science 193:597−599

doi: 10.1126/science.193.4253.597
[95]

Harris MS, Pannell JR. 2008. Roots, shoots and reproduction: sexual dimorphism in size and costs of reproductive allocation in an annual herb. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275:2595−2602

doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0585