[1]

Errington TM, Mathur M, Soderberg CK, Denis A, Perfito N, et al. 2021. Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology. eLife 10:e71601

doi: 10.7554/eLife.71601
[2]

Camerer CF, Dreber A, Holzmeister F, Ho TH, Huber J, et al. 2018. Evaluating the replicability of social science experiments in Nature and Science between 2010 and 2015. Nature Human Behaviour 2:637−644

doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0399-z
[3]

Holzmeister F, Johannesson M, Camerer CF, Chen Y, Ho TH, et al. 2025. Examining the replicability of online experiments selected by a decision market. Nature Human Behaviour 9:316−330

doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02062-9
[4]

Chakravorti T, Koneru S, Rajtmajer S. 2025. Reproducibility and replicability in research: What 452 professors think in Universities across the USA and India. PLoS One 20:e0319334

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319334
[5]

Angelopoulos A, Cahoon JF, Alterovitz R. 2024. Transforming science labs into automated factories of discovery. Science Robotics 9:eadm6991

doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.adm6991
[6]

Niederer SA, Sacks MS, Girolami M, Willcox K. 2021. Scaling digital twins from the artisanal to the industrial. Nature Computational Science 1:313−320

doi: 10.1038/s43588-021-00072-5
[7]

Seifrid M, Pollice R, Aguilar-Granda A, Chan ZM, Hotta K, et al. 2022. Autonomous chemical experiments: challenges and perspectives on establishing a self-driving lab. Accounts of Chemical Research 55:2454−2466

doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00220
[8]

von Kortzfleisch VT, Ambrée O, Karp NA, Meyer N, Novak J, et al. 2022. Do multiple experimenters improve the reproducibility of animal studies? PLoS Biology 20:e3001564

doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001564
[9]

von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, et al. 2007. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. BMJ 335:806−808

doi: 10.1136/bmj.39335.541782.AD
[10]

Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Mulrow CD, et al. 2007. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. Epidemiology 18:805−835

doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181577511
[11]

Benchimol EI, Smeeth L, Guttmann A, Harron K, Moher D, et al. 2015. The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Medicine 12:e1001885

doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885
[12]

Vandenbroucke JP. 2007. The making of STROBE. Epidemiology 18:797−799

doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318157725d
[13]

Pouwels KB, Widyakusuma NN, Groenwold RHH, Hak E. 2016. Quality of reporting of confounding remained suboptimal after the STROBE guideline. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 69:217−224

doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.009
[14]

Lu MY, Chen B, Williamson DFK, Chen RJ, Zhao M, et al. 2024. A multimodal generative AI copilot for human pathology. Nature 634:466−473

doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07618-3
[15]

Zhang J, Liu L, Xiang P, Fang Q, Nie X, et al. 2024. AI co-pilot bronchoscope robot. Nature Communications 15:241

doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-44385-7
[16]

Zhang Z, Ren Z, Hsu CW, Chen W, Hong ZW, et al. 2025. A multimodal robotic platform for multi-element electrocatalyst discovery. Nature 647:390−396

doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09640-5
[17]

Gao CA, Howard FM, Markov NS, Dyer EC, Ramesh S, et al. 2023. Comparing scientific abstracts generated by ChatGPT to real abstracts with detectors and blinded human reviewers. npj Digital Medicine 6:75

doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00819-6
[18]

Piccolo SR, Denny P, Luxton-Reilly A, Payne SH, Ridge PG. 2023. Evaluating a large language model's ability to solve programming exercises from an introductory bioinformatics course. PLoS Computational Biology 19:e1011511

doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011511
[19]

Dennstädt F, Zink J, Putora PM, Hastings J, Cihoric N. 2024. Title and abstract screening for literature reviews using large language models: an exploratory study in the biomedical domain. Systematic Reviews 13:158

doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02575-4
[20]

Tang L, Sun Z, Idnay B, Nestor JG, Soroush A, et al. 2023. Evaluating large language models on medical evidence summarization. npj Digital Medicine 6:158

doi: 10.1038/s41746-023-00896-7
[21]

Alber DA, Yang Z, Alyakin A, Yang E, Rai S, et al. 2025. Medical large language models are vulnerable to data-poisoning attacks. Nature Medicine 31:618−626

doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03445-1
[22]

Vaccaro M, Almaatouq A, Malone T. 2024. When combinations of humans and AI are useful: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nature Human Behaviour 8:2293−2303

doi: 10.1038/s41562-024-02024-1
[23]

Hua HU, Kaakour AH, Rachitskaya A, Srivastava S, Sharma S, et al. 2023. Evaluation and comparison of ophthalmic scientific abstracts and references by current artificial intelligence chatbots. JAMA Ophthalmology 141:819−824

doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.3119
[24]

Thirunavukarasu AJ, Ting DSJ, Elangovan K, Gutierrez L, Tan TF, et al. 2023. Large language models in medicine. Nature Medicine 29:1930−1940

doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02448-8
[25]

Roustan D, Bastardot F. 2025. The clinicians' guide to large language models: a general perspective with a focus on hallucinations. Interactive Journal of Medical Research 14:e59823

doi: 10.2196/59823
[26]

Dip SA, Mallick D, Shuvo UA, Soumma SB, Rafsani F, et al. 2026. Large language model agents for biological intelligence across genomics, proteomics, spatial biology, and biomedicine. Briefings in Bioinformatics 27(2):bbag110

doi: 10.1093/bib/bbag110
[27]

Bu D, Sun J, Li K, He Z, Huang W, et al. 2026. Empowering AI data scientists using a multi-agent LLM framework with self-evolving capabilities for autonomous, tool-aware biomedical data analyses. Nature Biomedical Engineering Ahead of print

doi: 10.1038/s41551-026-01634-6
[28]

Tzanis E, Adams LC, Akinci D'Antonoli T, Bressem KK, Cuocolo R, et al. 2026. Agentic systems in radiology: principles, opportunities, privacy risks, regulation, and sustainability concerns. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging 107(1):7−16

doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2025.10.002
[29]

Xu Q, Soto C, Shahnawaz M, Liu X, Jiang X, et al. 2025. Multi agent large language models for biomedical hypothesis generation in drug combination discovery. iScience 28(12):113984

doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113984
[30]

Yu B, Kumbier K. 2020. Veridical data science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 117:3920−3929

doi: 10.1073/pnas.1901326117
[31]

Rosner B. 2015. Fundamentals of biostatistics. 8th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning. 888 pp
[32]

Wang L, Chen X, Deng XW, Wen H, You MK, et al. 2024. Prompt engineering in consistency and reliability with the evidence-based guideline for LLMs. npj Digital Medicine 7:41

doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01029-4
[33]

Chen S, Gao M, Sasse K, Hartvigsen T, Anthony B, et al. 2025. When helpfulness backfires: LLMs and the risk of false medical information due to sycophantic behavior. npj Digital Medicine 8:605

doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-02008-z
[34]

Adams AD, Benner RS, Riggs TW, Chescheir NC. 2018. Use of the STROBE checklist to evaluate the reporting quality of observational research in obstetrics. Obstetrics and Gynecology 132:507−512

doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002689
[35]

Ziemann S, Paetzolt I, Grüßer L, Coburn M, Rossaint R, et al. 2022. Poor reporting quality of observational clinical studies comparing treatments of COVID-19: a retrospective cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Research Methodology 22:23

doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01501-9
[36]

Cohen P, Cohen J, Aiken LS, West SG. 1999. The problem of units and the circumstance for POMP. Multivariate Behavioral Research 34:315−346

doi: 10.1207/S15327906MBR3403_2
[37]

Chambers CD, Tzavella L. 2022. The past, present and future of registered reports. Nature Human Behaviour 6:29−42

doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01193-7
[38]

Proctor DM, Dada N, Serquiña A, Willett JLE. 2023. Problems with peer review shine a light on gaps in scientific training. mBio 14:e0318322

doi: 10.1128/mbio.03183-22
[39]

Hamilton DG, Hong K, Fraser H, Rowhani-Farid A, Fidler F, et al. 2023. Prevalence and predictors of data and code sharing in the medical and health sciences: systematic review with meta-analysis of individual participant data. BMJ 382:e075767

doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-075767
[40]

Vasey B, Nagendran M, Campbell B, Clifton DA, Collins GS, et al. 2022. Reporting guideline for the early-stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI. Nature Medicine 28:924−933

doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01772-9
[41]

Collins GS, Moons KGM, Dhiman P, Riley RD, Beam AL, et al. 2024. TRIPOD+AI statement: updated guidance for reporting clinical prediction models that use regression or machine learning methods. BMJ 385:e078378

doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-078378
[42]

Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. 2010. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 340:c332

doi: 10.1136/bmj.c332
[43]

Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, Emerson M, Altman DG. 2010. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biology 8:e1000412

doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000412