Search
1993 Volume 8
Article Contents
RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

Natural language generation in critiquing

More Information
  • A central area of application for knowledge-based systems is for giving consultative advice to the user. Such systems engage the user in a dialogue in the process of collecting enough information to be able to infer a conclusion from the knowledge base. Traditionally, then, the main initiative in the consultation process has been allocated to the system
  • 加载中
  • Allen J, 1987. Natural Language Understanding, Benjamin/Cummings.

    Google Scholar

    André E and Rist T, 1990. “Towards a plan-based synthesis of illustrated documents” In: Proceedings of ECAI, Stockholm.

    Google Scholar

    Appelt D, 1985. Planning English Sentences, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar

    Austin J, 1962. How to do things with words, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar

    Baker M. “Analysing rhetorical relations in collaborative problem solving dialogues” (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar

    Cawsey A, 1989. “Explanatory dialogues” Interacting with Computers1(1) 69–92.

    Google Scholar

    Cohen P and Perrault C, 1979. “Elements of a plan-based theory of speech acts” Cognitive Sci.3 (3).

    Google Scholar

    Cohen P and Levesque H, 1985. “Speech acts and rationality” Proceedings of the23rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar

    Cohen R, 1987. “Analyzing the structure of argumentative discourse” Computational Linguistics 13 01–06.

    Google Scholar

    Dahl ö and Hellman C, 1990. “Rhetorical relations in discourse” Papers from the Second Nordic Conference on Text Comprehension in Man and Machine, Täby, Sweden.

    Google Scholar

    Dahl ö and Hellman C, 1993. “A language game analysis of critiquing” In: Papers from the Third Nordic Conference on Text Comprehension in Man and Machine, Linköping, Sweden (held in 1992).

    Google Scholar

    Dale R, Mellish C and Zock M (eds.), 1990. Current Research in Natural Language Generation, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar

    Dale R, Hovy E, Rösner D and Stock O (eds.), 1992. Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation: 6th International Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Trento, Italy.

    Google Scholar

    Davey A, 1978. Discourse Production, Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar

    Fischer G, Lemke A, Mastaglio T and Morch A, 1991. “The role of critiquing in cooperative problem solving” ACM Trans. on Infor. Syst.9 (2) 123–151.

    Google Scholar

    Grimes J, 1975. The Thread of Discourse, Mouton Publishers.

    Google Scholar

    Grosz B and Sidner C, 1986. “Attention, intention, and the structure of discourse” Computational Linguistics12 (3) 175–204.

    Google Scholar

    Halliday M and Hassan R, 1976. Cohesion in English, Longman.

    Google Scholar

    Hobbs J, 1985. On the Coherence and Structure of Discourse, CSLI Report CSLI–85–37, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar

    Horacek H, 1990. “An integrated view of text planning” In: Dale R, Mellish C and Zock M (eds.) Current Research in Natural Language Generation, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar

    Hovy E, 1988. “Approaches to the planning of coherent text” In: Proceedings 4th international Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Los Angeles, CA.

    Google Scholar

    Hovy E, 1990. “Unresolved issues in paragraph planning” In: Dale R, Mellish C and Zock M (eds.) Current Research in Natural Language Generation, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar

    Hovy E, 1990. “Parsimonious and profligate approaches to the question of discourse structure relations” 5th International Workshop on Text Generation, Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar

    Kass R and Finin T, 1988. “The need for user models in generating expert system explanations” International Journal of Expert Systems1(4) 345–375.

    Google Scholar

    Kay M, 1979. “Functional grammar” In: Proceedings of the 5th Annual Meeting, Berkeley Linguistic Society.

    Google Scholar

    McDonald D, 1980. Natural language production as a process of decision making under constraints, PhD Thesis, MIT, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar

    McKeown K, 1985. Text Generation, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar

    McKeown K and Swartout W, 1988. “Language generation and explanation” In: Zock M and Sabah G (eds.) Advances in Natural Language Generation, Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar

    McKeown K, Elhadad M, Fukumoto Y, Lim J, Lombardi C, Robin J and Smadja F, 1990. “Language generation in COMET” In: Mellish C, Dale R and Zock M (eds.) Current Research in Language Generation, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar

    Maier E and Hovy E, 1991. “A metafunctionally motivated taxonomy for discourse structure relations” In: Proceedings of The Third European Workshop on Language Generation pp 38–45, Judenstein, Austria.

    Google Scholar

    Mann W, 1984. “Discourse structures for text generation” In: Proceedings of 10th International Conference of Computational Linguistics, Stanford, CA.

    Google Scholar

    Mann W and Thompson S, 1987. “Rhetorical structure theory: Description and construction of text structures” In: Kempen G (ed.) Natural Language Generation, Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar

    Mann W and Thompson S, 1988. “Rhetorical structure theory: toward a functional theory of text organization” Text8, 243–281.

    Google Scholar

    Miller P, 1986. Expert Critiquing Systems, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar

    Miller P and Rennels G, 1988. “Prose generation from expert systems” Al Magazine9 (3), 37–44.

    Google Scholar

    Moore J and Paris C, 1989. “Planning text for advisory dialogues” In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Vancouver, Canada.

    Google Scholar

    Moore J and Pollack M, 1992. “A problem for RST: The need for multi-level discourse analysis” Computational Linguistics18 (4) 537–544.

    Google Scholar

    Moore J and Swartout W, 1989. “A reactive approach to explanation” In: Proceedings of IJCAI pp 1504–1510, Detroit, MI.

    Google Scholar

    Rankin I, 1989. The Deep Generation of Text in Expert Critiquing Systems, Licentiate Thesis No. 184, Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University.

    Google Scholar

    Rösner D and Stede M, 1992. “Customizing RST for the automatic production of technical manuals” In: Dale R, Hovy E, Rösner D and Stock O (eds.) Aspects of Automated Natural Language Generation pp 199–214, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar

    Searle J, 1969. Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar

    Silverman B, 1991. “Expert critics: operationalizing the judgement/decision making literature as a theory of ‘bugs’ and repair strategies” Knowledge Acquisition3, 175–214.

    Google Scholar

    Silverman B, 1992a. “Survey of expert critiquing systems” Communications of the ACM35 (4).

    Google Scholar

    Silverman B, 1992b. Critiquing Human Error, Academic Press.

    Google Scholar

    Simmons R and Slocum J, 1972. “Generating English discourse from semantic networks” Commnunications of the ACM15 (10).

    Google Scholar

    Toulmin S, 1958. The Uses of Argument, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar

    Toulrnin S, Rieke R and Janik A, 1979. An Introduction to Reasoning, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar

    van Eemeren H and Grootendorst R, 1983. Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions, Foris Publications.

    Google Scholar

    Wahlster W and Kobsa A, 1989. “User models in dialog systems” In: Kobsa A and Wahister W (eds.) User Models in Dialog Systems, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar

    Walton D, 1989. Informal Logic. A Handbook for Critical Argumentation pp 3–13, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar

    Weiner J, 1980. “BLAH, a system which explains its reasoning” Artificial Intelligence35 (15).

    Google Scholar

    Woods W, 1970. “Transition network grammar for natural language analysis” Communications of the ACM13591–606.

    Google Scholar

    Zock M, Adorni G and Ferrari G (eds.), 1993. Preprints from the Fourth European Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Pisa, Italy.

    Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Ivan Rankin. 1993. Natural language generation in critiquing. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 8:333 doi: 10.1017/S0269888900000333
    Ivan Rankin. 1993. Natural language generation in critiquing. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 8:333 doi: 10.1017/S0269888900000333

Article Metrics

Article views(19) PDF downloads(114)

Other Articles By Authors

RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

Natural language generation in critiquing

The Knowledge Engineering Review  8 Article number: 10.1017/S0269888900000333  (1993)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: A central area of application for knowledge-based systems is for giving consultative advice to the user. Such systems engage the user in a dialogue in the process of collecting enough information to be able to infer a conclusion from the knowledge base. Traditionally, then, the main initiative in the consultation process has been allocated to the system

    • Copyright © Cambridge University Press 19931993Cambridge University Press
References (53)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Ivan Rankin. 1993. Natural language generation in critiquing. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 8:333 doi: 10.1017/S0269888900000333
    Ivan Rankin. 1993. Natural language generation in critiquing. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 8:333 doi: 10.1017/S0269888900000333
  • Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return