Search
2026 Volume 6
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Detection of coliform bacteria in some ready-to-eat foods

More Information
  • Each year, many people around the world fall ill and even die through the consumption of contaminated food. In various countries, records of foodborne microbial diseases are kept in detail, which makes it possible to obtain information about the microorganism and the food responsible for the disease. Coliform bacteria are commonly found in the intestines and in nature, and therefore they are considered indicators of sanitation. In the current study, the coliform bacteria content of chicken döner, salad and çiğ köfte samples sold in Fethiye, a popular tourist destination, was analyzed. In total, 60 samples were obtained from buffets, cafés, and restaurants. The samples were transported to the laboratory in their sales packaging under aseptic conditions with cold storage maintained and they were analyzed on the same day. The samples were tested using violet red bile (VRB) agar medium. As a result of the analyses, the mean presumptive coliform counts were found to be 1.13 log colony-forming units (CFU)/g in chicken döner, 4.37 log CFU/g in salad, and 0.86 log CFU/g in çiğ köfte. For confirmed coliform counts, verification tests were performed using brilliant green bile broth (BGBB) medium. The confirmed coliform counts were determined to range from < 1.00 to 4.48 log CFU/g in chicken döner, from 1.54 to 7.53 log CFU/g in salad and from < 1.00 to 3.70 log CFU/g in çiğ köfte. Among the tested food samples, confirmed coliforms were found in 20% of the chicken döner, 95% of the salad and 25% of the çiğ köfte samples.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Burlingame B, Pineiro M. 2007. The essential balance: risks and benefits in food safety and quality. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 20:139−146 doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2006.12.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Kamboj S, Gupta N, Bandral JD, Gandotra G, Anjum N. 2020. Food safety and hygiene: a review. International Journal of Chemical Studies 8:358−368 doi: 10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i2f.8794

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Martin NH, Torres-Frenzel P, Wiedmann M. 2021. Invited review: controlling dairy product spoilage to reduce food loss and waste. Journal of Dairy Science 104:1251−1261 doi: 10.3168/jds.2020-19130

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Balkrishna A, Mishra S, Rana M, Arya V, Singh S. 2024. Effect of coliform bacteria on various environmental factors: a review. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research 14:279−292 doi: 10.52403/ijhsr.20240537

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Silva IF, de Rezende-Lago NCM, de Marchi PGF, Messias CT, Silva LA. Microbiological quality of food. In Collection of International Topics in Health Science – Vol.1. Brazil: Seven Editora. pp. 1501−1518 doi: 10.56238/colleinternhealthscienv1-120
    [6] Mladenović KG, Grujović MŽ, Kiš M, Furmeg S, Tkalec VJ, et al. 2021. Enterobacteriaceae in food safety with an emphasis on raw milk and meat. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 105:8615−8627 doi: 10.1007/s00253-021-11655-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Çiftçi M, Öncül N. 2021. The detection and enumeration of coliform bacteria in some ready-to-eat unpackaged food in Fethiye region. Turkish Journal of Agriculture- Food Science and Technology 9:2552−2559 doi: 10.24925/turjaf.v9isp.2552-2559.4928

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Sancak H, İşleyici Ö, Sağun E, Ekici K, Dereli DB, et al. 2020. Tatvan'da tüketime sunulan tavuk dönerlerin mikrobiyolojik kalitesi [Microbiological quality of chicken doners presented for consumed in Tatvan]. Bitlis Eren Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi [Bitlis Eren University Journal of Science] 9:1514−1526 (in Turkish) doi: 10.17798/bitlisfen.758441

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Alçay, AÜ. 2019. İstanbul'da satılan pişmiş tavuk dönerlerin mikrobiyolojik kalitesinin araştırılması [Investigation of microbiological quality of cooked chicken doner sold in Istanbul]. Türk Mikrobiyoloji Cemiyeti Dergisi [Turkish Journal of Microbiology] 49:74−85 (in Turkish) doi: 10.5222/TMCD.2019.074

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Balpetek Külcü D, Soğuksulu S, Çakan Y, Ergen Ç. 2020. Determination of the microflora of meatless cig kofte in the Black Sea region of Turkey. Middle Black Sea Journal of Health Science 6:177−182 doi: 10.19127/mbsjohs.707934

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Yurttaş M. 2023. Comparison of microbiological properties of Turkish traditional raw meatballs in winter and summer. Sabuncuoglu Serefeddin Health Sciences 5:19−28 doi: 10.55895/sshs.1279454

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Owda SMA, 2014. Bacteriological quality of fresh vegetables salad in schools canteens and restaurants in gaza strip. Master Thesis. The Islamic University, Gaza. 123 pp.
    [13] Habibi Najafi MB, Bahreini M. 2012. Microbiological quality of mixed fresh-cut vegetable salads and mixed ready-to-eat fresh herbs in Mashhad, Iran. In International Conference on Nutrition and Food Sciences. Singapore: IACSIT Press. pp. 62−66
    [14] Berger CN, Sodha SV, Shaw RK, Griffin PM, Pink D, et al. 2010. Fresh fruit and vegetables as vehicles for the transmission of human pathogens. Environmental Microbiology 12:2385−2397 doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02297.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Mercanoglu Taban B, Halkman AK. 2011. Do leafy green vegetables and their ready-to-eat [RTE] salads carry a risk of foodborne pathogens? Anaerobe 17:286−287 doi: 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2011.04.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Food Safety Authority of Ireland (FSAI). 2015. Survey of the microbiological safety of ready-to-eat, pre-cut and pre-packaged fresh herbs and salad leaves from retail stablishments in Ireland (13NS7). In Monıtorıng And Surveillance Serıes Mıcrobıology. Dublin, Ireland: Food Safety Authority of Ireland. 27 pp. www.fsai.ie/getmedia/24e3ee56-a8c5-4afd-9cef-27fd1c558319/fresh-herbs-and-salad-leaves-final.pdf?ext=.pdf
    [17] Wadamori Y, Gooneratne R, Hussain MA. 2017. Outbreaks and factors influencing microbiological contamination of fresh produce. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 97:1396−1403 doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8125

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Castro-Ibáñez I, Gil MI, Allende A. 2017. Ready-to-eat vegetables: current problems and potential solutions to reduce microbial risk in the production chain. LWT-Food Science and Technology 85:284−292 doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2016.11.073

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Ahmad Mir S, Ahmad Shah M, Mir MM, Dar BN, Greiner R, et al. 2018. Microbiological contamination of ready-to-eat vegetable salads in developing countries and potential solutions in the supply chain to control microbial pathogens. Food Control 85:235−244 doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.10.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Al-Musawi AT, Abu-Almaaly RA, Kareem HS. 2023. Fecal coliform bacteria in vegetable salads prepared in Baghdad restaurants. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology 17:1214−1220 doi: 10.22207/JPAM.17.2.51

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Institute of Food Technologists (IFT). 2004. Bacteria associated with foodborne diseases. Scientific status summary. Chicago, USA: Institute of Food Technologists. 25 pp. http://pdfedit.xml-journal.cn/pdfview/article/23479b0662854e9118abd0b7c39cffc52ded9dfb340385d18afec5788a473c64_210586_0
    [22] ACT, 1997. Foodborne disease: towards reducing foodborne illness in Australia. Technical Report Series No 2. Canberra: ACT Commonwealth Department of Health and Family Services. 100 pp. www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/cda-cditech-foodborne.htm/$FILE/foodbrne.pdf
    [23] World Health Organization (WHO). 2026. Food safety. www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/food-safety
    [24] International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 2017. Microbiology of the food chain—preparation of test samples, initial suspension and decimal dilutions for microbiological examination—Part 1: general rules for the preparation of the initial suspension and decimal dilutions. 2nd Edition. Switzerland: ISO. 26 pp. www.iso.org/obp/ui/en/#iso:std:iso:6887:-1:ed-2:v1:en
    [25] Fishbein M, Mehlman IJ, Chugg L, Jr. Olson JC. 1976. Coliform, Fecal Coliforms, E. coli, and Enteropathogenic E. coli. In Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods, ed. Speck ML. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association. pp. 277−300
    [26] Feng P, Weagant SD, Grant MA, Burkhardt W. 2020. Chapter 4: Enumeration of Escherichia coli and the coliform bacteria. In FDA's Bacteriological Analytical Manual. USA: Food and Drug Administration. 18 pp. www.fda.gov/media/182572/download?attachment
    [27] Unnevehr LJ. 2022. Addressing food safety challenges in rapidly developing food systems. Agricultural Economics 53:529−539 doi: 10.1111/agec.12724

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Korkmaz R, Merey G. 2023. Gıda güvenliğinin önemi ve bakterilerin tespiti için yöntemler [Importance of food safety and methods for the detection of bacteria]. Sağlık Bilimleri ve Yönetimi Dergisi [Journal of Health Sciences and Management] 3:47−53 (in Turkish) doi: 10.29228/johesam.24

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Vazgecer B, Ulu H, Oztan A. 2004. Microbiological and chemical qualities of chicken döner kebab retailed on the Turkish restaurants. Food Control 15:261−2644 doi: 10.1016/S0956-7135(03)00065-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Zernadji W, Rahmani F, Jebri S, Hamdi M, Khammassi M, et al. 2025. Distribution of microbial contaminants of minimally processed salads produced in Tunisia: need to strengthen good hygiene practices. International Journal of Food Science 2025:9570620 doi: 10.1155/ijfo/9570620

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Cerna-Cortes JF, Leon-Montes N, Cortes-Cueto AL, Salas-Rangel LP, Helguera-Repetto, AC, et al. 2015. Microbiological quality of ready-to-eat vegetables collected in Mexico City: occurrence of aerobic-mesophilic bacteria, fecal coliforms, and potentially pathogenic nontuberculous mycobacteria. BioMed Research International 2015:789508 doi: 10.1155/2015/789508

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Abaza A. 2017. Bacteriological assessment of some vegetables and ready-to-eat salads in Alexandria, Egypt. Journal of Egyptian Public Health Association 92:177−187 doi: 10.21608/epx.2017.16400

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Elçek ER. 2021. Van'da satışa sunulan pişmiş tavuk döner kebaplarının mikrobiyolojik kalitesi üzerine bir araştırma [An investigation on the microbiological quality of chicken doner kebaps retailed in Van]. Master Thesis. Van Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi, Türkiye. 56 pp. (in Turkish) https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14720/21708
    [34] Gargaci Kinay A, Kaptangil K. 2019. Determining the microbiological quality and managerial approaches to develop hygienic process of meat and chicken doners purchased from food enterprises in the centre of Sinop. Ottoman: Journal of Tourism & Management Research 4:599−606 doi: 10.26465/ojtmr.2018339530

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Kayisoglu S, Yilmaz I, Demirci M, Yetim H. 2003. Chemical composition and microbiological quality of the doner kebabs sold in Tekirdag market. Food Control 14:469−474 doi: 10.1016/S0956-7135(02)00103-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Bilgin A, Akkaya E, Bingöl EB. 2024. İstanbul'da satışa sunulan tavuk dönerlerinde Clostridioides difficile varlığının ve antimikrobiyal duyarlılıklarının belirlenmesi [Determination of the presence of Clostridioides difficile and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of the isolates in chicken doner kebabs sold in Istanbul]. Dicle Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi [Dicle University Journal of Faculty of Veterinary Medicine] 17:18−23 (in Turkish) doi: 10.47027/duvetfd.1492751

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Nur G, Deveci HA, Kırpık MA, Nur Ö, Ayata E. 2016. Gıda güvenilirliği kriterlerine göre Hatay'da satılan tavuk dönerlerinde mikrobiyolojik kalite [Microbiological quality of chicken doner kebabs sold in Hatay according to food safety criteria]. Kafkas Ü niversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi [Institute of Natural and Applied Science Journal] 9:14−22 (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar

    [38] Türkmen H, Tiske-İnan SS. 2025. Microbiological and some physicochemical properties of chicken döner kebabs consumed in Karaman. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences 39:539−549 doi: 10.15316/selcukjafsci.1640278

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Küplülü Ö, Sarımehmetoğlu B, Oral N. 2003. The microbiological quality of çiğ köfte sold in Ankara. Turkish Journal of Veterinary & Animal Sciences 27:325−329

    Google Scholar

    [40] Ghazzi M, Porto-Fett ACS, Ayaz ND, Ozansoy G, Çufaoğlu G, et. al. 2018. Microbiological characterization of çiğ köfte sold at retail in Ankara, Turkey, and evaluation of selected antimicrobials as ingredients to control foodborne pathogens in çiğ köfte during refrigerated storage. Food Control 84:138−147 doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.04.033

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Cetinkaya F, Mus TE, Cibik R, Levent B, Gulesen R. 2012. Assessment of microbiological quality of cig kofte (raw consumed spiced meatball): prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella. Food Control 26:15−18 doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.01.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Uçak Özkaya G, Geçgel U, Durak MZ. 2022. Multi-criteria decision-making technique approach to assess the microbial quality and safety of fresh-cut salads sold at retail in Istanbul, Turkey. Tekirdağ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 19:366−379 doi: 10.33462/jotaf.994068

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Albu E, Prisacaru AE, Ghinea C, Ursachi F, Apostol LC. 2024. Ready-to-use vegetable salads: physicochemical and microbiological evaluation. Applied Sciences 14:3068 doi: 10.3390/app14073068

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Arıcı M, Yılmaz S. 2006. Paketlenmiş taze sebzelerin bazı mikrobiyolojik özellikleri ve raf ömrünün belirlenmesi [Determining some microbiological characteristics and shelf life of packaged fresh vegetables]. Gıda Teknolojileri Elektronik Dergisi [Electronic Journal of Food Technologies] 1:9−21 (in Turkish)

    Google Scholar

    [45] Söderqvist K. 2017. Is your salad safe to eat? Aspects of foodborne zoonotic bacteria in ready-to-eat leafy vegetables and mixed-ingredient salads. Doctoral Thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala. 84 pp. https://research.slu.se/ws/portalfiles/portal/19093976/fulltext.pdf
    [46] European Commission. 2005. Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 of 15 November 2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs. Version 2020. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. 26 pp. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A02005R2073-20200308
    [47] Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığından. 2025. Türk Gıda Kodeksi Mikrobiyolojik Kriterler Yönetmeliği (TGK) [Turkish Food Codex Microbiological Criteria Regulation]. Resmî Gazete. Sayı: 32812. www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2025/02/20250213-1.htm
  • Cite this article

    Aslan G, Çiftçi M, Öncül N. 2026. Detection of coliform bacteria in some ready-to-eat foods. Food Materials Research 6: e009 doi: 10.48130/fmr-0026-0009
    Aslan G, Çiftçi M, Öncül N. 2026. Detection of coliform bacteria in some ready-to-eat foods. Food Materials Research 6: e009 doi: 10.48130/fmr-0026-0009

Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(92) PDF downloads(47)

Other Articles By Authors

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Detection of coliform bacteria in some ready-to-eat foods

Food Materials Research  6 Article number: e009  (2026)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Each year, many people around the world fall ill and even die through the consumption of contaminated food. In various countries, records of foodborne microbial diseases are kept in detail, which makes it possible to obtain information about the microorganism and the food responsible for the disease. Coliform bacteria are commonly found in the intestines and in nature, and therefore they are considered indicators of sanitation. In the current study, the coliform bacteria content of chicken döner, salad and çiğ köfte samples sold in Fethiye, a popular tourist destination, was analyzed. In total, 60 samples were obtained from buffets, cafés, and restaurants. The samples were transported to the laboratory in their sales packaging under aseptic conditions with cold storage maintained and they were analyzed on the same day. The samples were tested using violet red bile (VRB) agar medium. As a result of the analyses, the mean presumptive coliform counts were found to be 1.13 log colony-forming units (CFU)/g in chicken döner, 4.37 log CFU/g in salad, and 0.86 log CFU/g in çiğ köfte. For confirmed coliform counts, verification tests were performed using brilliant green bile broth (BGBB) medium. The confirmed coliform counts were determined to range from < 1.00 to 4.48 log CFU/g in chicken döner, from 1.54 to 7.53 log CFU/g in salad and from < 1.00 to 3.70 log CFU/g in çiğ köfte. Among the tested food samples, confirmed coliforms were found in 20% of the chicken döner, 95% of the salad and 25% of the çiğ köfte samples.

    • As the consumption of ready-to-eat foods becomes more widespread worldwide, the microbial load of these foods, which provide a favorable environment for the growth of microorganisms, should be considered a priority. To ensure a safe food chain, it is necessary to guarantee food safety at every step, from production to consumption. In this regard, the authorities involved in all stages of food production, up until the product reaches the consumer, must work in cooperation[1,2]. If adequate hygiene and sanitation are not applied to foods during the production, preparation, or storage of foods, or during their presentation to the consumer, various microorganisms can contaminate the food. It is known that contaminated foods cause more than 200 diseases[2].

      Coliform bacteria are non-spore-forming, Gram-negative, rod-shaped bacteria that are commonly found in the intestinal systems of humans and animals. They make up a facultative anaerobic bacterial group that can ferment lactose and produce gas and acid when incubated at 35−37 °C for 48 h[3,4]. This group primarily includes bacteria belonging to the genera Escherichia, Enterobacter, Citrobacter, and Klebsiella. Only Escherichia coli uses the intestinal tract as its primary habitat. The others can be found in other environments such as vegetation and soil[5]. Since coliform bacteria are members of the Enterobacteriaceae family, regulations regarding their presence and quantity have been established within the framework of the microbiological standards defined in food safety legislation[6]. In this context, coliform bacteria detected in foods indicate that sanitation conditions are inadequate, that heat treatment is insufficient or improperly applied, or that recontamination may have occurred after heat treatment. In addition, the detection of E. coli in foods indicates that direct or indirect fecal contamination has occurred and that other enteric pathogens may also be present[7].

      Döner kebab is one of the most popular fast-food items in Türkiye and is also consumed worldwide. Depending on preference, lamb, mutton, beef, chicken, or turkey meat is used in its production. In the Turkish Food Codex Communiqué on Raw Red Meat and Prepared Red Meat Mixtures, it is defined as a meat product obtained by horizontally or vertically rotating and cooking mixtures made from bovine or ovine carcass meats or minced meats that have been brought to a ready-to-cook state through the addition of certain ingredients such as flavor enhancers, animal fats, milk, and eggs[8]. The microbiological quality of döner kebab is directly affected by the microbiota of the meat used; contamination occurring during preparation, cooking and serving; and the garnishes served alongside it. In studies conducted in Türkiye to determine the microbiological quality of döner kebab, microorganisms such as the coliform group of bacteria, Salmonella spp., Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, Listeria monocytogenes, Clostridium perfringens, and E. coli O157:H7 have been detected[9].

      Çiğ köfte is a traditional food widely consumed in Türkiye. It is prepared using the traditional method, in which raw meat, bulgur, tomato paste, and various spices are kneaded by hand for a long time. Although çiğ köfte recipes vary by geographical region and by consumer or producer preferences, the Turkish Standards Institute defines meatless çiğ köfte as "A product prepared by kneading bulgur, red pepper, onion, garlic, various spices, tomato/pepper paste, vinegar, sugar, pomegranate syrup, water and certain vegetable oils together with additives permitted by legislation by hand or machine until a specific consistency is achieved and made ready for consumption either frozen or unfrozen." Since çiğ köfte is offered for consumption without any heat treatment, it can spoil easily during storage. Because of the ingredients used in its production, the preparation conditions, personal hygiene, possible contamination during transportation and storage and the fact that it is consumed raw, it is considered to be among the high-risk foods for public health[10,11].

      Salad is a food produced by mixing raw fruits and vegetables such as cucumber, pepper, tomato, onion, carrot, lettuce, spring onion, and radish[12]. Because of its beneficial effects on health and in line with the recommendations of various organizations (World Health Organization [WHO], European Food Safety Authority [EFSA], Food and Agriculture Organization [FAO] and US Department of Agriculture [USDA]), it has become quite popular among consumers in recent years[13]. In many countries, raw fruits and vegetables are commonly consumed as salad. Consuming these products raw increases the risk of foodborne diseases[12]. These products, which act as carriers of pathogens, also lead to outbreaks of foodborne diseases worldwide[14,15]. The fresh products used in the preparation of salads can become contaminated with microorganisms at many stages from field to fork[14]. Many factors threaten the quality and safety of salads, such as irrigation with contaminated water, fertilization, contact with farm or wild animals before harvest, improper storage conditions and packaging materials, contaminated wash water, unhygienic tools and equipment used during processing, sick food handlers, and exposure to cross-contamination during food preparation after harvest[1620].

      Despite the difficulties involved in the identification of the conditions that lead to foodborne diseases and their consequences, it is quite clear that most of these diseases are caused by microorganisms (bacteria)[21]. Seen from this perspective, preventing foodborne diseases, which cause both economic and social problems such as issues in the health system, economy, tourism, and trade in both developed and developing countries, is extremely important[22,23]. Today, as interest in healthy eating continues to increase, the demand for fresh, unprocessed, or minimally processed nutritious food products is also rising accordingly. When combined with the lack of knowledge during the processing stages, döner made from poultry meat, which carries a high risk of contamination, and çiğ köfte and salad samples that are offered to consumers without any heat treatment can pose a serious threat to public health. It is important to assess the situation to reduce and prevent foodborne outbreaks that can harm individuals' health, the country's healthcare system, and commercial enterprises' economic wellbeing. In the current study, the presence of coliform bacteria was investigated to determine the microbial quality of potentially risky ready-to-eat products such as chicken döner, çiğ köfte, and salad.

    • In the current study, ready-to-eat chicken döner, çiğ köfte, and salad samples sold in the Fethiye district of Muğla Province (Türkiye) were used as materials. The samples used in the study were obtained from several local buffets, cafés, and restaurants in Fethiye, with 20 samples from each sample group, making a total of 60 samples. The samples were collected in the same form in which they were served to customers and transported under aseptic conditions to the Research Laboratory of the Department of Nutrition and Dietetics at Fethiye Faculty of Health Sciences of Muğla Sıtkı Koçman University. Samples were transferred in a thermobox with ice packs, maintaining a temperature of approximately 4 °C, and analyzed on the same day within a maximum of 2 h after purchase.

    • From the chicken döner, çiğ köfte, and salad samples, 25 g each was weighed and homogenized for 3 min in a stomacher device with 225 mL of peptone water (0.1%) (Oxoid, LP0037, England) in sterile sample bags. From the homogenate obtained, 10-fold dilutions were prepared using 1 mL of the sample and 0.1% peptone water, and these dilutions were used for determining the coliform bacteria counts[24].

      Coliform bacteria and confirmed coliform bacteria were enumerated according to the FDA's Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) and the American Public Health Association (APHA) Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods[25,26].

    • Coliform bacteria were counted using the pour plate method (1 mL) with violet red bile agar (VRBA, Biokar, BK152HA, France) as the culture medium. From the prepared dilutions, 1 mL was transferred into parallel sterile petri dishes and 15–20 mL of the medium, previously melted and cooled to 40−45°C, was poured over them in a thin layer. The sample was mixed with the medium by gently rotating the plate. After the medium solidified, the petri dishes were inverted and incubated aerobically at 35−37 °C for 18−24 h (Daihan scientific, Thermo Stable IG-105, Korea)[25,26].

    • After incubation, red colonies surrounded by a reddish precipitate zone measuring 1–2 mm in diameter on the plates were counted. For the confirmation test, 10 colonies were inoculated with a loop into brilliant green bile broth (BGBB; Merck KgaA, 1.05454.0500, Germany) containing Durham tubes and then incubated at 35−37 °C for 24−48 h. At the end of the incubation period, tubes showing gas production and membrane formation were identified, and Gram staining was performed. Tubes that were Gram-negative according to the Gram staining results were evaluated as confirmed coliforms[26]. Based on the results obtained, the calculation was performed as follows:

      $ CCC=SC\times PPT\times DF $
      $ {\mathrm{CCC}} = {\mathrm{Confirmed}} \;{\mathrm{Coliform}} \;{\mathrm{count}} \;(\mathrm{CFU}/\mathrm{g}) $
      $ \mathrm{SC=Count\;of\;suspect\;colonies\;in\;VRBA} $
      $ \mathrm{PPT=Percentage\;of\;positive\;tubes\;in\;BGBB} $
      $ \mathrm{DF=Dilution\;factor} $
    • The study was conducted with two replicates and two parallels. When incubation was completed, the plates containing between 10 and 250 colonies were evaluated, and the results were expressed as log colony-forming units (CFU)/g. The statistical analysis of the data was carried out using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the SPSS Statistics software package (IBM SPSS Statistics Version 22; USA) at a 95% confidence level. The differences between the means were determined using the Duncan test.

    • The coliform bacteria results for the chicken döner, çiğ köfte, and salad samples are presented in Tables 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Presumptive coliforms were detected in 33 of the tested samples (55%). In 27 samples (45%), the presumptive coliform count was below the detectable limit (< 1.00 ± 0.00 log CFU/g). Among the samples in which presumptive coliforms were detected (33 samples), confirmed coliforms were found in 28 samples (84.85%) according to the confirmation test. Of these 28 samples, 4 were chicken döner (6.67%), 5 were çiğ köfte (8.33%), and 19 were salad samples (31.67%).

      Table 1.  Results for coliform bacteria in chicken döner kebab samples (log CFU/g)*.

      Samples Presumptive coliforms Confirmed coliforms
      1 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      2 2.81 ± 0.81c 2.00 ± 0.11c
      3 3.91 ± 0.14d 3.39 ± 0.14d
      4 1.95 ± 0.13b 0.94 ± 0.14b
      5 1.73 ± 0.18b ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      6 5.13 ± 0.03f ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      7 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      8 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      9 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      10 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      11 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      12 4.58 ± 0.05e 4.48 ± 0.05e
      13 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      14 2.47 ± 0.02c ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      15 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      16 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      17 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      18 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      19 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      20 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      Maximum value 5.13 ± 0.03 4.48 ± 0.05
      Minimum value ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00
      Mean value 1.13 0.54
      * n = 4, (±, standard deviation); different lowercase letters indicate that the values in the same column are significantly different from each other (p ˃ 0.05). Values in bold indicate the highest and lowest values among the samples in each column; bold formatting is also used to highlight the summary rows.

      Table 2.  Results for coliform bacteria in çiğ köfte (raw meatball) samples (log CFU/g)*.

      Samples Presumptive coliforms Confirmed coliforms
      1 3.70 ± 0.01d 3.49 ± 0.01e
      2 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      3 3.65 ± 0.09d ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      4 3.46 ± 0.10d 3.23 ± 0.10d
      5 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      6 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      7 2.91 ± 0.08c 2.57 ± 0.08c
      8 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      9 1.95 ± 0.25b 1.63 ± 0.25b
      10 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      11 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      12 1.60 ± 0.36b 1.56 ± 0.36b
      13 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      14 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      15 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      16 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      17 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      18 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      19 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      20 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      Maximum value 3.70 ± 0.01 3.49 ± 0.01
      Minimum value ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00
      Mean value 0.86 0.62
      * n = 4, (±, standard deviation); different lowercase letters indicate that the values in the same column are significantly different from each other (p ˃ 0.05). Values in bold indicate the highest and lowest values among the samples in each column; bold formatting is also used to highlight the summary rows.

      Table 3.  Results for coliform bacteria in salad samples (log CFU/g)*.

      Samples Presumptive coliforms Confirmed coliforms
      1 4.47 ± 0.15g 4.31 ± 0.15ı
      2 5.28 ± 0.01k 5.04 ± 0.03lm
      3 5.68 ± 0.01l 5.46 ± 0.01n
      4 4.68 ± 0.03 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00a
      5 3.79 ± 0.04f 2.79 ± 0.04de
      6 5.82 ± 0.08l 5.12 ± 0.08m
      7 2.60 ± 0.13c 2.60 ± 0.13d
      8 7.53 ± 0.02m 7.43 ± 0.03o
      9 5.23 ± 0.04k 5.23 ± 0.04m
      10 3.93 ± 0.11f 3.71 ± 0.12g
      11 4.99 ± 0.13j 4.89 ± 0.13kl
      12 4.65 ± 0.08ghı 4.55 ± 0.08j
      13 1.54 ± 0.08a 1.45 ± 0.09b
      14 3.47 ± 0.02e 3.31 ± 0.02f
      15 4.51 ± 0.00gh 4.12 ± 0.01h
      16 4.47 ± 0.17g 4.32 ± 0.18ı
      17 1.98 ± 0.04b 1.68 ± 0.04c
      18 5.05 ± 0.15j 5.05 ± 0.15lm
      19 4.75 ± 0.01ı 4.71 ± 0.02jk
      20 2.97 ± 0.10d 2.93 ± 0.10e
      Maximum value 7.53 ± 0.02 7.43 ± 0.03
      Minimum value 1.54 ± 0.08 ˂ 1.00 ± 0.00
      Mean value 4.37 3.93
      * n = 4, (±, standard deviation); different lowercase letters indicate that the values in the same column are significantly different from each other (p ˃ 0.05). Values in bold indicate the highest and lowest values among the samples in each column; bold formatting is also used to highlight the summary rows.

      In 35% of the chicken döner samples, presumptive coliforms were detected, and confirmed coliforms were found in 20% of them. In samples numbered 5, 6, and 14, where presumptive coliforms were detected, the confirmed coliform count was < 1.00 ± 0.00 log CFU/g. In the chicken döner samples, the highest confirmed coliform level was calculated in Sample 12 as 4.48 ± 0.05 log CFU/g (Table 1).

      In six (30%) of the çiğ köfte samples, presumptive coliforms were detected, and in five (25%) of them, confirmed coliforms were found. Coliforms were not detected in any samples except Samples 1, 4, 7, 9, and 12. The highest coliform counts were calculated in Sample 1 (Table 2).

      Presumptive coliforms were found in all the salad samples (100%), and the mean value was 4.37 log CFU/g. The lowest confirmed coliform count was detected in Sample 4 and the highest in Sample 8. Among all the salad samples, only Sample 4 showed no confirmed coliforms (Table 3).

    • Providing reliable data on food safety worldwide is important for both protecting public health and preventing economic losses. WHO/Foodborne Disease Burden Epidemiology Reference Group (FERG) reports that approximately 35% of the global burden of foodborne diseases is caused by foods of animal origin[27]. In recent years, it has become important to investigate the presence of bacteria defined as food safety indicators in ready-to-eat foods, which have rapidly become widespread worldwide[28]. In this connection, many researchers in their respective countries are conducting studies on the microbiological quality of ready-to-eat foods and salads, and their results are being reported[911,20,2932].

      If hygiene is inadequate during the slaughtering of poultry, personal and environmental contamination occurs; as a result, the microbial load of the product, especially that of the skin, increases. For example, the use of contaminated skin in producing döner negatively affects the microbiological quality of the final product, even if heat treatment is applied. It has been determined that döner made from poultry meat has a higher microbial load compared with those made from red meat[33]. In the current study, the confirmed coliform values of the 20 different chicken döner samples were found to range from < 1.00 ± 0.00 to 4.48 ± 0.05 log CFU/g. The obtained data were found to be statistically different from each other (p < 0.05) (Table 1).

      Alçay[9] examined 30 cooked chicken döner samples to determine the microbiological quality of chicken döner sold in Istanbul. Enterobacteriaceae were detected in 12 of these samples (ranging from < 10 to 4 × 102 CFU/g), and E. coli was found in 6 of the samples (20%) (ranging from < 10 to 2 × 101 CFU/g). Vazgeçer et al.[29] conducted a study in the city center of Ankara to examine the microbiological quality of chicken döner kebabs (72 samples) offered for consumption and evaluate their reliability in terms of public health. In the study, coliform group microorganisms were detected in 44% of the samples, with values reported to less than 10.0 CFU/g. Coliform group microorganisms were observed in 17% of the chicken döner samples, with values ranging from 10 to 102 CFU/g. It was reported that coliform bacteria were detected in 11%, 17%, and 11% of the döner samples in the range of 102−103, 103−104, and 104−105 CFU/g, respectively. In a study conducted to determine the microbiological characteristics of chicken and meat döner offered for consumption by eight enterprises in Sinop Province, 54 döner samples were examined. Coliform group bacteria were detected in all except one sample, with counts ranging from 0.389 to 1.079 log CFU/g[34]. In a study of 60 raw or cooked beef or chicken döner samples collected in Tekirdağ, the mean value of coliform group bacteria was detected to be 4.66 log CFU/g in raw chicken döner and 2.42 log CFU/g in cooked ones[35]. In a study investigating the presence of Clostridioides difficile in chicken döner samples sold in Istanbul, 12 out of 128 samples were identified as suspected C. difficile and two were confirmed[36]. In a study examining the microbiological quality of 50 chicken döner samples collected from 15 different sales areas in various parts of Antakya, E. coli was detected in 24% of the samples and Salmonella spp. was found in seven samples[37]. Türkmen and Tiske-İnan[38] examined a total of 20 raw and cooked döner kebab samples collected from 20 different restaurants in Karaman. They determined total coliform bacteria counts ranging between 1.00 and 764 pieces per gram (pcs/g), with an average of 96.16 pcs/g for raw samples and 1.04 pcs/g for cooked ones.

      Chicken döner is a heat-treated food. Its microbiological quality is negatively affected if hygiene and sanitation conditions are not properly maintained. The presence of microorganisms observed in the results can be explained by factors such as insufficient cooking during the process starting from the raw material; the use of contaminated raw materials, additives, and packaging materials; and personnel lacking adequate training.

      In the current study, the confirmed coliform counts of the 20 different çiğ köfte samples ranged from < 1.00 ± 0.00 to 3.49 ± 0.01 log CFU/g. The results were found to be statistically different from each other (p < 0.05) (Table 2).

      Yurttaş[11] aimed to determine the microbiological quality of çiğ köfte offered on the market in Çorum. For this reason, 20 çiğ köfte samples were examined in both the winter and summer months. The coliform counts of the samples were reported to range from 1.56 to 5.61 log CFU/g. Although E. coli was not detected in any of the samples, it was reported that the microbial quality of çiğ köfte sold during the summer period was lower. As a result of the study, it was suggested that the raw materials and additives used in the products, as well as the ambient temperature, influenced the results. In the study by Külcü et al.[10] 120 çiğ köfte samples collected in several cities (Trabzon, Giresun, Ordu, and Samsun) of the Black Sea region of Türkiye were examined microbiologically. In the study, the average count of coliform bacteria was found to be a minimum of 2.09 most probable number (MPN)/g and a maximum of 40.66 MPN/g. The E. coli count was determined to be an average of 1.25, 24.40, 38.90, and 25.11 MPN/g, respectively, for Trabzon, Giresun, Ordu, and Samsun. In another study, 50 çiğ köfte samples were collected from different retail outlets at various times in Ankara. As a result of the evaluation, it was reported that coliform bacteria were present in 86% of the samples, ranging from 2.78 to 5.71 log CFU/g[39]. In a study conducted between 2015 and 2016 to determine the microbiological quality of çiğ köfte offered for consumption in the city centre of Ankara, 168 çiğ köfte samples were examined. Twenty-four samples were prepared with beef, and the rest were vegetarian ones (144 samples) without meat. Coliform bacteria counts were found to be < 2.30−6.58 log CFU/g in beef çiğ köfte, whereas the coliform counts were reported to range from < 2.30 to 5.73 log CFU/g in vegetarian çiğ köfte[40]. The microbiological quality of çiğ köfte samples (a total of 100) obtained from various markets and restaurants in Bursa was investigated. In the analyses, the mean value of coliform bacteria in çiğ köfte samples were reported to be 2.9 × 103 CFU/g. Coliforms were detected in 77% of the çiğ köfte samples[41].

      The results of the previous studies are consistent with those of the current study, indicating that the overall microbiological quality of çiğ köfte is low. This situation can be explained by factors such as the absence of heat treatment during the production process of çiğ köfte and constant hand contact during production and sale. Moreover, the raw materials, spices, sauces, and other additives used in production are also thought to affect the microbiological quality.

      In the current study, coliform group bacteria were found at a higher rate in the salad samples compared with the other sample groups. For confirmed coliforms, the results range from < 1.00 ± 0.00 to 7.43 ± 0.03 log CFU/g. In 5% of the examined salad samples, confirmed coliform bacteria were found to be below the detectable level. The results are statistically different from each other (p < 0.05) (Table 3).

      In a study conducted in Baghdad, 25 ready-made vegetable salad samples randomly collected from local restaurants, along with swab samples from the hands of the staff involved in preparation, were examined for the presence of coliforms. The total coliform counts in the examined salads ranged from 1.35 to 4.78 log CFU/g, whereas the coliform counts in the swab samples taken from the hands of the staff in the same areas ranged from 1.10 to 3.90 log CFU/g[20]. In a study investigating the microbiological quality of commercially sold ready-made salads in Tunisia, coliform group bacteria were detected in all the 100 samples, with total coliform counts ranging from 4 to 8.57 log CFU/g. E. coli was detected in 11% of the samples, with counts ranging from 1.62 to 3.15 log CFU/g[30]. In a study aiming to determine the microbial quality of freshly cut salads in restaurants located in various districts of Istanbul, 180 salad samples were analyzed. The mean total coliform counts of the collected samples were calculated according to districts, with values found to range from 1.046.5 to 3.588.1 MPN/g. In addition, E. coli was detected in 7.22% of all the samples[42]. In a study examining ready-to-eat salad samples sold in supermarkets (especially leafy green vegetables), coliform group bacteria were found in all the salad samples, with counts ranging from 5.00 to 6.39 log CFU/g[43]. Another study investigated the microbiological quality of salads and sprouts in Mexico City. In total, 200 samples were collected from supermarkets and street vendors. The mean value of coliform group bacteria was higher in salad samples obtained from street vendors (1,000 MPN/g) than supermarkets (56 MPN/g). Fecal coliforms were detected in 32% of the salad samples. Coliform bacteria were identified in all sprout samples, and fecal coliforms were confirmed in 69% of them. As was the case with coliform group bacteria, the fecal count was higher in samples from street vendors than in those from supermarkets[31]. In another study, 50 salad samples were purchased from restaurants and street vendors in Alexandria District, Egypt. The mean value of total and fecal coliform bacteria was higher in samples from restaurants than from street vendors. Total and fecal coliform counts in restaurant samples ranged from 4.15 log MPN/100 g to 1.60–6.15 log MPN/100 g, respectively, whereas street vendor samples showed ranges of 2.98–4.15 log MPN/100 g for total coliforms and 1.60–4.15 log MPN/100 g for fecal coliforms[32].

      Salad products are exposed to microbiological risks during the washing, cutting, and/or grating stages of the raw materials. Before being served to consumers, the products are stored under refrigeration and, during this process, preservatives such as salt and vinegar are generally avoided because of their wilting effects. During low-temperature storage, microorganisms belonging to the Enterobacteriaceae family, including pathogens, can grow[44,45].

    • Ready-to-eat meals include foods that are either consumed directly, such as desserts, salads, and cold dishes, or foods that require heating. According to Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 and the Turkish Food Codex Microbiological Criteria Regulation, microbiological criteria for coliform bacteria are defined for certain food categories as food safety criteria; however, no specific numerical limits are established for coliform bacteria in ready-to-eat foods. In this context, coliform bacteria are primarily used as hygiene indicator microorganisms rather than food safety criteria. Therefore, elevated coliform counts observed in the examined ready-to-eat foods reflect inadequate hygienic conditions and may increase the potential risk to public health[46,47]. Under normal conditions, coliform group bacteria are not expected to be present in heat-treated foods such as chicken döner. The detection of coliform groups in the chicken döner samples examined in the current study is thought to be caused by the high initial microbial load of the product, insufficient heat treatment, or violations of sanitation rules during serving. The results in the çiğ köfte samples were attributed to the raw materials such as vegetables and spices used in production, as well as equipment, personnel and serving utensils. The high levels of coliform bacteria detected in salads are believed to result from soil contamination or inadequate hygiene and sanitation practices throughout the process up to serving. Establishing a food safety system based on hygiene and sanitation practices is important for reducing foodborne diseases and protecting public health. Thus, by ensuring that all stakeholders in the food chain take an active role in the production and delivery of safe food, the microbiological quality of ready-to-eat foods can be improved.

      • Part of this study was presented as an oral presentation and abstract under the title "Determination of Coliform Group Bacteria in Some Foods" at the MSKU National Interdisciplinary Student Congress held on May 12–14, 2022 (Muğla, Türkiye).

      • The authors confirm their contributions to the paper as follows: study conception and design, methodology: Öncül N; data collection: Aslan G, Çiftçi M; analysis and interpretation of results, draft manuscript preparation, writing – review and editing: Aslan G, Öncül N. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • All data obtained during this study are included in this published article. Further information may be requested from the corresponding author.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2026 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press on behalf of Nanjing Agricultural University. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Table (3) References (47)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Aslan G, Çiftçi M, Öncül N. 2026. Detection of coliform bacteria in some ready-to-eat foods. Food Materials Research 6: e009 doi: 10.48130/fmr-0026-0009
    Aslan G, Çiftçi M, Öncül N. 2026. Detection of coliform bacteria in some ready-to-eat foods. Food Materials Research 6: e009 doi: 10.48130/fmr-0026-0009

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return