Search
2026 Volume 2
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Polystyrene nanoplastics as emerging reproductive toxicants: sex-specific effects, offspring risks, and molecular mechanisms

  • Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.

  • Received: 04 July 2026
    Revised: 24 July 2026
    Accepted: 27 August 2026
    Published online: 14 September 2026
    New Contaminants  2,  Article number: e025 (2026)  |  Cite this article
  • The reproductive toxicity and offspring developmental toxicity of PSNPs to different species and their main mechanisms are reviewed.

    Compare the differences in gender sensitivity of PSNPs-induced reproductive toxicity.

    Oxidative stress is the key mechanism by which PSNPs induce reproductive toxicity.

    The reproductive toxicity of aged PSNPs and their combined toxic effects with other pollutants are highlighted as critical areas of concern.

  • Plastic products are ubiquitous in daily life, and their large-scale production and improper disposal have resulted in severe environmental pollution. Plastics degrade into micro- and nano-plastics (MNPs) in nature and can accumulate in the human body. Detected in human reproductive organs, these particles threaten reproductive and developmental health. Among MNPs, polystyrene nanoplastics (PSNPs) are one of the most extensively studied types due to their widespread prevalence. Herein, we conduct a comprehensive review of existing literature focusing on PSNPs, revealing that PSNPs induce distinct reproductive toxicity in both genders and across different species: they damage male testes, disrupt the blood-testicular barrier (BTB), and impair sperm quality; they alter female ovarian function, disturb hormone levels, and reduce oocyte quantity and ovulation. Furthermore, PSNPs also harm embryonic development and offspring, triggering miscarriage and birth defects. Mechanistically, the reproductive toxicity of PSNPs is mediated through multiple molecular pathways, including oxidative stress, endocrine disruption, inflammation, autophagy, and apoptosis. In conclusion, we have integrated systematic knowledge and molecular mechanisms regarding PSNPs-induced reproductive toxicity. We fully clarify the risks and hazards to reproductive and developmental health posed by PSNPs, emphasize the importance of public health intervention and preventive measures, and provide new insights for further research on their toxic mechanisms and prevention.
    Graphical Abstract
  • 加载中
  • [1] Hartmann NB, Hüffer T, Thompson RC, Hassellöv M, Verschoor A, et al. 2019. Are we speaking the same language? Recommendations for a definition and categorization framework for plastic debris. Environmental Science & Technology 53:1039−1047 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05297

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Gan Q, Cui J, Jin B. 2023. Environmental microplastics: classification, sources, fates, and effects on plants. Chemosphere 313:137559 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137559

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Geyer R, Jambeck JR, Law KL. 2017. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Advances 3:e1700782 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1700782

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Dokl M, Copot A, Krajnc D, Van Fan Y, Vujanović A, et al. 2024. Global projections of plastic use, end-of-life fate and potential changes in consumption, reduction, recycling and replacement with bioplastics to 2050. Sustainable Production and Consumption 51:498−518 doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2024.09.025

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Walker TR, Fequet L. 2023. Current trends of unsustainable plastic production and micro(nano)plastic pollution. TrAC, Trends in Analytical Chemistry 160:116984 doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2023.116984

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Lau WWY, Shiran Y, Bailey RM, Cook E, Stuchtey MR, et al. 2020. Evaluating scenarios toward zero plastic pollution. Science 369:1455−1461 doi: 10.1126/science.aba9475

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Singh B, Sharma N. 2008. Mechanistic implications of plastic degradation. Polymer Degradation and Stability 93:561−584 doi: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2007.11.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Thompson RC, Olsen Y, Mitchell RP, Davis A, Rowland SJ, et al. 2004. Lost at sea: where is all the plastic? Science 304:838 doi: 10.1126/science.1094559

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Cózar A, Echevarría F, González-Gordillo JI, Irigoien X, Úbeda B, et al. 2014. Plastic debris in the open ocean. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111:10239−10244 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314705111

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Wen S, Zhao Y, Wang M, Yuan H, Xu H. 2024. Micro(nano)plastics in food system: potential health impacts on human intestinal system. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 64:1429−1447 doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2116559

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Paul I, Mondal P, Haldar D, Halder G. 2024. Beyond the cradle – amidst microplastics and the ongoing peril during pregnancy and neonatal stages: a holistic review. Journal of Hazardous Materials 469:133963 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.133963

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Stock V, Böhmert L, Lisicki E, Block R, Cara-Carmona J, et al. 2019. Uptake and effects of orally ingested polystyrene microplastic particles in vitro and in vivo. Archives of Toxicology 93:1817−1833 doi: 10.1007/s00204-019-02478-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Sykes EA, Dai Q, Tsoi KM, Hwang DM, Chan WCW. 2014. Nanoparticle exposure in animals can be visualized in the skin and analysed via skin biopsy. Nature Communications 5:3796 doi: 10.1038/ncomms4796

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Peng Y, He Q. 2024. Reproductive toxicity and related mechanisms of micro(nano)plastics in terrestrial mammals: review of current evidence. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 279:116505 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116505

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Leslie HA, Van Velzen MJM, Brandsma SH, Vethaak AD, Garcia-Vallejo JJ, et al. 2022. Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood. Environment International 163:107199 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107199

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Pironti C, Notarstefano V, Ricciardi M, Motta O, Giorgini E, et al. 2022. First evidence of microplastics in human urine, a preliminary study of intake in the human body. Toxics 11:40 doi: 10.3390/toxics11010040

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Huang S, Huang X, Bi R, Guo Q, Yu X, et al. 2022. Detection and analysis of microplastics in human sputum. Environmental Science & Technology 56:2476−2486 doi: 10.1021/acs.est.1c03859

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Schwabl P, Köppel S, Königshofer P, Bucsics T, Trauner M, et al. 2019. Detection of various microplastics in human stool: a prospective case series. Annals of Internal Medicine 171:453−457 doi: 10.7326/M19-0618

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Liu S, Guo J, Liu X, Yang R, Wang H, et al. 2023. Detection of various microplastics in placentas, meconium, infant feces, breastmilk and infant formula: a pilot prospective study. Science of The Total Environment 854:158699 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158699

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Ragusa A, Svelato A, Santacroce C, Catalano P, Notarstefano V, et al. 2021. Plasticenta: first evidence of microplastics in human placenta. Environment International 146:106274 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106274

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Wan S, Wang X, Chen W, Xu Z, Zhao J, et al. 2024. Polystyrene nanoplastics activate autophagy and suppress trophoblast cell migration/invasion and migrasome formation to induce miscarriage. ACS Nano 18:3733−3751 doi: 10.1021/acsnano.3c11734

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Yu CW, Luk TC, Liao VHC. 2021. Long-term nanoplastics exposure results in multi and trans-generational reproduction decline associated with germline toxicity and epigenetic regulation in Caenorhabditis elegans. Journal of Hazardous Materials 412:125173 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125173

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Sun Z, Wen X, Zhan C, Liu W. 2026. Developmental toxicity of microplastics: mechanisms of action, influencing factors and research progress. Journal of Hazardous Materials: Plastics 4:100067 doi: 10.1016/j.hazmp.2026.100067

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Xu JL, Lin X, Wang JJ, Gowen AA. 2022. A review of potential human health impacts of micro- and nanoplastics exposure. Science of The Total Environment 851:158111 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.158111

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Kelpsiene E, Ekvall MT, Lundqvist M, Torstensson O, Hua J, et al. 2022. Review of ecotoxicological studies of widely used polystyrene nanoparticles. Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts 24:8−16 doi: 10.1039/D1EM00375E

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Gouin T, Ellis-Hutchings R, Pemberton M, Wilhelmus B. 2024. Addressing the relevance of polystyrene nano- and microplastic particles used to support exposure, toxicity and risk assessment: implications and recommendations. Particle and Fibre Toxicology 21:39 doi: 10.1186/s12989-024-00599-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Mishra P, Vinayagam S, Duraisamy K, Patil SR, Godbole J, et al. 2019. Distinctive impact of polystyrene nano-spherules as an emergent pollutant toward the environment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26:1537−1547 doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3698-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Liu W, Zeng M, Li Y, Chen G, Wen J, et al. 2024. Deciphering the research of micro(nano)plastics: an in-depth bibliometric expedition into ecotoxicological impacts and research trends. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 172:117608 doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2024.117608

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Vollset SE, Goren E, Yuan C-W, Cao J, Smith AE, et al. 2020. Fertility, mortality, migration, and population scenarios for 195 countries and territories from 2017 to 2100: a forecasting analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet 396:1285−1306 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30677-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Qiao QF, Wang LQ, Xu QJ, Wu XM, Chen QD, et al. 2025. Exposure to polystyrene nanoplastics compromise ovarian reserve function and endometrial decidualization in early pregnant mice. Journal of Applied Toxicology 45:1230−1242 doi: 10.1002/jat.4765

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Zhang Z, Meng J, Tian J, Li N, Chen Z, et al. 2024. Reproductive and developmental implications of micro- and nanoplastic internalization: recent advances and perspectives. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 286:117245 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.117245

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Montano L, Giorgini E, Notarstefano V, Notari T, Ricciardi M, et al. 2023. Raman microspectroscopy evidence of microplastics in human semen. Science of The Total Environment 901:165922 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165922

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Nunzio AD, Giarra A, Toscanesi M, Amoresano A, Piscopo M, et al. 2022. Comparison between macro and trace element concentrations in human semen and blood serum in highly polluted areas in Italy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19:11635 doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811635

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Amereh F, Amjadi N, Mohseni-Bandpei A, Isazadeh S, Mehrabi Y, et al. 2022. Placental plastics in young women from general population correlate with reduced foetal growth in IUGR pregnancies. Environmental Pollution 314:120174 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.120174

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Cheng X, Xue Y, Wang H, Ma Z, Hu N, et al. 2025. Maternal exposure to polystyrene nanoplastics during gestation and lactation caused fertility decline in female mouse offspring. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 289:117632 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.117632

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Wan S, Wang X, Chen W, Wang M, Zhao J, et al. 2024. Exposure to high dose of polystyrene nanoplastics causes trophoblast cell apoptosis and induces miscarriage. Particle and Fibre Toxicology 21:13 doi: 10.1186/s12989-024-00574-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Cheng CY, Mruk DD. 2012. The blood-testis barrier and its implications for male contraception. Pharmacological Reviews 64:16−64 doi: 10.1124/pr.110.002790

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Xu W, Yuan Y, Tian Y, Cheng C, Chen Y, et al. 2023. Oral exposure to polystyrene nanoplastics reduced male fertility and even caused male infertility by inducing testicular and sperm toxicities in mice. Journal of Hazardous Materials 454:131470 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2023.131470

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Jin H, Ma T, Sha X, Liu Z, Zhou Y, et al. 2021. Polystyrene microplastics induced male reproductive toxicity in mice. Journal of Hazardous Materials 401:123430 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.123430

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Taylor U, Barchanski A, Petersen S, Kues WA, Baulain U, et al. 2014. Gold nanoparticles interfere with sperm functionality by membrane adsorption without penetration. Nanotoxicology 8:118−127 doi: 10.3109/17435390.2013.859321

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Tallec K, Paul-Pont I, Boulais M, Le Goïc N, González-Fernández C, et al. 2020. Nanopolystyrene beads affect motility and reproductive success of oyster spermatozoa (Crassostrea gigas). Nanotoxicology 14:1039−1057 doi: 10.1080/17435390.2020.1808104

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Dong M, Song H, Xie C, Zhang Y, Huang H, et al. 2024. Polystyrene microplastics photo-aged under simulated sunlight influences gonadal development in the Pacific oyster. Marine Environmental Research 195:106367 doi: 10.1016/j.marenvres.2024.106367

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Gallot V, Berwanger da Silva AL, Genro V, Grynberg M, Frydman N, et al. 2012. Antral follicle responsiveness to follicle-stimulating hormone administration assessed by the follicular output RaTe (FORT) may predict in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer outcome. Human Reproduction 27:1066−1072 doi: 10.1093/humrep/der479

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Mesen TB, Young SL. 2015. Progesterone and the luteal phase. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 42:135−151 doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2014.10.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Sobhani Z, Panneerselvan L, Fang C, Naidu R, Megharaj M. 2021. Chronic and transgenerational effects of polystyrene microplastics at environmentally relevant concentrations in earthworms (Eisenia fetida). Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 40:2240−2246 doi: 10.1002/etc.5072

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Tu Q, Deng J, Di M, Lin X, Chen Z, et al. 2023. Reproductive toxicity of polystyrene nanoplastics in Drosophila melanogaster under multi-generational exposure. Chemosphere 330:138724 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138724

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Sussarellu R, Suquet M, Thomas Y, Lambert C, Fabioux C, et al. 2016. Oyster reproduction is affected by exposure to polystyrene microplastics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 113:2430−2435 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1519019113

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Tallec K, Huvet A, Di Poi C, González-Fernández C, Lambert C, et al. 2018. Nanoplastics impaired oyster free living stages, gametes and embryos. Environmental Pollution 242:1226−1235 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.08.020

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Zhang W, Liu Z, Tang S, Li D, Jiang Q, et al. 2020. Transcriptional response provides insights into the effect of chronic polystyrene nanoplastic exposure on Daphnia pulex. Chemosphere 238:124563 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124563

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Bringer A, Cachot J, Dubillot E, Prunier G, Huet V, et al. 2022. Intergenerational effects of environmentally-aged microplastics on the Crassostrea gigas. Environmental Pollution 294:118600 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118600

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Errázuriz León R, Araya Salcedo VA, Novoa San Miguel FJ, Llanquinao Tardio CRA, Tobar Briceño AA, et al. 2024. Photoaged polystyrene nanoplastics exposure results in reproductive toxicity due to oxidative damage in Caenorhabditis elegans. Environmental Pollution 348:123816 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123816

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Shen C, Zuo Z. 2020. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) as an excellent vertebrate model for the development, reproductive, cardiovascular, and neural and ocular development toxicity study of hazardous chemicals. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 27:43599−43614 doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-10800-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Liu W, Liao H, Wei M, Junaid M, Chen G, et al. 2024. Biological uptake, distribution and toxicity of micro(nano)plastics in the aquatic biota: a special emphasis on size-dependent impacts. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 170:117477 doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2023.117477

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Pujol G, Marín-Gual L, González-Rodelas L, Álvarez-González L, Chauvigné F, et al. 2025. Short-term polystyrene nanoplastic exposure alters zebrafish male and female germline and reproductive outcomes, unveiling pollutant-impacted molecular pathways. Journal of Hazardous Materials 481:136529 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136529

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Zhang C, Li L, Alava JJ, Yan Z, Chen P, et al. 2024. Female zebrafish (Danio rerio) exposure to polystyrene nanoplastics induces reproductive toxicity in mother and their offspring. Aquatic Toxicology 273:107023 doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2024.107023

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Zeng M, Zhan C, Li Y, Liao H, Liu W, et al. 2024. Melatonin prevents the transgenerational toxicity of nanoplastics in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Science of The Total Environment 953:176043 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.176043

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Amereh F, Babaei M, Eslami A, Fazelipour S, Rafiee M. 2020. The emerging risk of exposure to nano(micro)plastics on endocrine disturbance and reproductive toxicity: from a hypothetical scenario to a global public health challenge. Environmental Pollution 261:114158 doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114158

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] An R, Wang X, Yang L, Zhang J, Wang N, et al. 2021. Polystyrene microplastics cause granulosa cells apoptosis and fibrosis in ovary through oxidative stress in rats. Toxicology 449:152665 doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2020.152665

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Zheng Y, Gan X, Lin C, Wang D, Chen R, et al. 2024. Polystyrene nanoplastics cause reproductive toxicity in zebrafish: PPAR mediated lipid metabolism disorder. Science of The Total Environment 931:172795 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.172795

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Liao H, Gao D, Junaid M, et al. 2023. Parental exposure to polystyrene nanoplastics and di(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate induces transgenerational growth and reproductive impairments through bioaccumulation in Daphnia magna. Science of The Total Environment 882:163657 doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163657

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] Li S, Wang Q, Yu H, Yang L, Sun Y, et al. 2021. Polystyrene microplastics induce blood–testis barrier disruption regulated by the MAPK-Nrf2 signaling pathway in rats. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 28:47921−47931 doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13911-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62] Xie X, Deng T, Duan J, Xie J, Yuan J, et al. 2020. Exposure to polystyrene microplastics causes reproductive toxicity through oxidative stress and activation of the p38 MAPK signaling pathway. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 190:110133 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.110133

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Zeng L, Zhou C, Xu W, Huang Y, Wang W, et al. 2023. The ovarian-related effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on human ovarian granulosa cells and female mice. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 257:114941 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.114941

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64] Baarsma HA, Königshoff M, Gosens R. 2013. The WNT signaling pathway from ligand secretion to gene transcription: molecular mechanisms and pharmacological targets. Pharmacology & Therapeutics 138:66−83 doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.01.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Andersson-Sjöland A, Karlsson JC, Rydell-Törmänen K. 2016. ROS-induced endothelial stress contributes to pulmonary fibrosis through pericytes and Wnt signaling. Laboratory Investigation 96:206−217 doi: 10.1038/labinvest.2015.100

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66] Jin H, Yan M, Pan C, Liu Z, Sha X, et al. 2022. Chronic exposure to polystyrene microplastics induced male reproductive toxicity and decreased testosterone levels via the LH-mediated LHR/cAMP/PKA/StAR pathway. Particle and Fibre Toxicology 19:13 doi: 10.1186/s12989-022-00453-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67] Gholiof M, Wessels JM, Foster WG, Turpin V, Leonardi M. 2025. Effects of polystyrene nanoplastics on the female reproductive system in mice: implications for ovarian function and follicular development. Reproductive Toxicology 136:108983 doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2025.108983

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68] Liu Z, Zhuan Q, Zhang L, Meng L, Fu X, et al. 2022. Polystyrene microplastics induced female reproductive toxicity in mice. Journal of Hazardous Materials 424:127629 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127629

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69] Hou J, Lei Z, Cui L, Hou Y, Yang L, et al. 2021. Polystyrene microplastics lead to pyroptosis and apoptosis of ovarian granulosa cells via NLRP3/Caspase-1 signaling pathway in rats. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 212:112012 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70] Kyriakis JM, Avruch J. 2001. Mammalian mitogen-activated protein kinase signal transduction pathways activated by stress and inflammation. Physiological Reviews 81:807−869 doi: 10.1152/physrev.2001.81.2.807

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71] Kaminska B. 2005. MAPK signalling pathways as molecular targets for anti-inflammatory therapy − from molecular mechanisms to therapeutic benefits. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Proteins and Proteomics 1754:253−262 doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2005.08.017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72] Chang C, Jensen LE, Hurley JH. 2021. Autophagosome biogenesis comes out of the black box. Nature Cell Biology 23:450−456 doi: 10.1038/s41556-021-00669-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73] Amaral A, Lourenço B, Marques M, Ramalho-Santos J. 2013. Mitochondria functionality and sperm quality. Reproduction 146:R163−R174 doi: 10.1530/REP-13-0178

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74] Liu T, Hou B, Wang Z, Yang Y. 2022. Polystyrene microplastics induce mitochondrial damage in mouse GC-2 cells. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 237:113520 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113520

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75] He Y, Yin R. 2024. The reproductive and transgenerational toxicity of microplastics and nanoplastics: a threat to mammalian fertility in both sexes. Journal of Applied Toxicology 44:66−85 doi: 10.1002/jat.4510

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76] Jiang S, Liang C, Gao Y, Liu Y, Han Y, et al. 2019. Fluoride exposure arrests the acrosome formation during spermatogenesis via down-regulated Zpbp1, Spaca1 and Dpy19l2 expression in rat testes. Chemosphere 226:874−882 doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.019

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77] Zhou L, Yu Z, Xia Y, Cheng S, Gao J, et al. 2022. Repression of autophagy leads to acrosome biogenesis disruption caused by a sub-chronic oral administration of polystyrene nanoparticles. Environment International 163:107220 doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107220

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78] Elmore S. 2007. Apoptosis: a review of programmed cell death. Toxicologic Pathology 35:495−516 doi: 10.1080/01926230701320337

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79] Staud F, Karahoda R. 2018. Trophoblast: the central unit of fetal growth, protection and programming. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology 105:35−40 doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2018.09.016

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80] Sun Z, Wen Y, Zhang F, Fu Z, Yuan Y, et al. 2023. Exposure to nanoplastics induces mitochondrial impairment and cytomembrane destruction in Leydig cells. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 255:114796 doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2023.114796

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81] Bai Y, Zhu C, Feng M, Pan B, Zhang S, et al. 2020. Establishment of a reversibly inducible porcine granulosa cell line. Cells 9:156 doi: 10.3390/cells9010156

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82] Suman A, Mahapatra A, Gupta P, Ray SS, Singh RK. 2023. Polystyrene microplastics modulated bdnf expression triggering neurotoxicity via apoptotic pathway in zebrafish embryos. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology 271:109699 doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2023.109699

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83] Rao G, Qiao B, Zhong G, Li T, Su Q, et al. 2024. Arsenic and polystyrene-nano plastics co-exposure induced testicular toxicity: triggers oxidative stress and promotes apoptosis and inflammation in mice. Environmental Toxicology 39:264−276 doi: 10.1002/tox.23970

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84] Sharma K, Sharma A, Bhatnagar P. 2024. Combined effect of polystyrene nanoplastic and di-n-butyl phthalate on testicular health of male Swiss albino mice: analysis of sperm-related parameters and potential toxic effects. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 31:23680−23696 doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-32697-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85] Kandaswamy K, Guru A, Panda SP, Antonyraj APM, Kari ZA, et al. 2024. Polystyrene nanoplastics synergistically exacerbate diclofenac toxicity in embryonic development and the health of adult zebrafish. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part C: Toxicology & Pharmacology 281:109926 doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2024.109926

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86] Li Y, Huo S, Yan N. 2026. A transformative perspective on aggregation-induced emission bioimaging: illuminating the complex pathways of metal nanomaterial toxicology. Environmental Science: Nano 13:1763−1775 doi: 10.1039/D6EN00020G

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87] Wang Y, Hu Y, Mo J, Yan Wong T, Liu J, et al. 2024. Bioprospecting of Chlamydomonas reinhardtii for boosting biofuel-related products production based on novel aggregation-induced emission active extracellular polymeric substances nanoprobes. Bioresource Technology 399:130636 doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2024.130636

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88] Yan N, Hu Y, Tang BZ, Wang WX. 2021. Real-time 3D framework tracing of extracellular polymeric substances by an AIE-active nanoprobe. ACS Sensors 6:4206−4216 doi: 10.1021/acssensors.1c01821

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Huang L, Liu W, Zhan C. 2026. Polystyrene nanoplastics as emerging reproductive toxicants: sex-specific effects, offspring risks, and molecular mechanisms. New Contaminants 2: e025 doi: 10.48130/newcontam-0026-0022
    Huang L, Liu W, Zhan C. 2026. Polystyrene nanoplastics as emerging reproductive toxicants: sex-specific effects, offspring risks, and molecular mechanisms. New Contaminants 2: e025 doi: 10.48130/newcontam-0026-0022

Figures(5)  /  Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(1100) PDF downloads(275)

Other Articles By Authors

Review   Open Access    

Polystyrene nanoplastics as emerging reproductive toxicants: sex-specific effects, offspring risks, and molecular mechanisms

New Contaminants  2,  Article number: e025  (2026)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Plastic products are ubiquitous in daily life, and their large-scale production and improper disposal have resulted in severe environmental pollution. Plastics degrade into micro- and nano-plastics (MNPs) in nature and can accumulate in the human body. Detected in human reproductive organs, these particles threaten reproductive and developmental health. Among MNPs, polystyrene nanoplastics (PSNPs) are one of the most extensively studied types due to their widespread prevalence. Herein, we conduct a comprehensive review of existing literature focusing on PSNPs, revealing that PSNPs induce distinct reproductive toxicity in both genders and across different species: they damage male testes, disrupt the blood-testicular barrier (BTB), and impair sperm quality; they alter female ovarian function, disturb hormone levels, and reduce oocyte quantity and ovulation. Furthermore, PSNPs also harm embryonic development and offspring, triggering miscarriage and birth defects. Mechanistically, the reproductive toxicity of PSNPs is mediated through multiple molecular pathways, including oxidative stress, endocrine disruption, inflammation, autophagy, and apoptosis. In conclusion, we have integrated systematic knowledge and molecular mechanisms regarding PSNPs-induced reproductive toxicity. We fully clarify the risks and hazards to reproductive and developmental health posed by PSNPs, emphasize the importance of public health intervention and preventive measures, and provide new insights for further research on their toxic mechanisms and prevention.

    • Plastic products are widely utilized in daily life owing to their versatility, practicality, low cost, and lightweight properties. Common plastic types include polyethylene (PE), polypropylene (PP), polyurethane (PU), polyethylene terephthalate (PET), polystyrene (PS), and polyvinyl chloride (PVC)[1,2] (Fig. 1). Since 1950, the global output of plastics has grown exponentially[3]. It is estimated that by 2050, global plastic production will reach between 902 and 1,124 Mt[4]. Meanwhile, most plastics are used as disposable consumer goods and have limited recyclability. Only about 9% of global plastic is recycled, while the remaining 79% accumulates in natural ecosystems[5]. Extensive use and improper disposal of plastics have led to plastic pollution of terrestrial and aquatic systems. Even with immediate and concerted action, 710 Mt of plastic waste will enter terrestrial and aquatic systems[6]. Plastic pollution thus constitutes a pressing and substantial environmental challenge.

      Figure 1. 

      Sources and types of micro- and nano-plastics.

      Upon entering the environment, plastics undergo continuous degradation into MNPs[7]. MNPs, the microscopic plastic fragments first described in 2004[8], are persistent, mobile, and ubiquitous in terrestrial and aquatic environments. Varied sources and weathering patterns give rise to diverse morphological characteristics of microplastics (MPs), encompassing fragments, fibers, pellets, spheres, films, and foams[2]. MPs are now broadly defined as plastic particles ≤ 5 mm in diameter, and research has shown that micron-sized particles can be further degraded into nanoplastics (NPs), which are < 100 nm[9]. MNPs are pervasive in daily life, having been detected in the water we drink, the air we breathe, and the food we eat, including seafood, table salt, honey, sugar, and beverages such as beer and tea[10]. Four primary exposure pathways for MNPs have been identified: the first and most unavoidable is via inhalation; MNPs in the air are transmitted to the lungs through the respiratory tract and then enter the bloodstream[11]. Second is via ingestion; the ingested MNPs enter the stomach through the esophagus and, with the help of microfold cells, cross the intestinal barrier and enter the lymphatic tissues[12]. Third is via dermal contact; MNPs accumulate in the dermis and subcutaneous tissue after contact with the skin and then enter the organism[13]. Fourth is medical intervention, a newly recognized pathway involving exposure to MNPs from medical procedures and devices (e.g., infusion tubes, syringes, masks, and implants), which remains understudied[14].

      Recent experimental evidence has demonstrated the adverse effects of MNPs on multiple organ systems in humans. MNPs have been detected in various biological samples, including blood[15], urine[16], sputum[17], feces[18], and breast milk[19]. In 2021, the research by Ragusa et al.[20] first reported the presence of MPs in the human placenta and meconium[19]. Research by Wan et al.[21] indicates that PSNP exposure can induce abortion in mice. These findings demonstrate direct exposure to the fetus, raising concerns for reproductive toxicity and long-term health consequences for the offspring.

      While MPs and NPs share similar characteristics and biological effects, NPs exhibit higher bioavailability and mobility due to their smaller size, enabling them to cross biological membranes more readily[22]. PS is the most commonly used material in nanoplastics research, attributed to its widespread use, accessibility, and compatibility with fluorescence labeling and various surface modifications[23,24]. There are more than 50 distinct types of plastics, yet only a few are employed in large-scale production, with polystyrene being one of them[25]. Given that PS is extensively used in food and cosmetic packaging, it is more prone to being incorporated into food as tiny plastic fragments and subsequently ingested by the human body[26], or released into the environment, thereby causing nonnegligible hazards to both human health and ecosystems[27]. Therefore, this review focuses specifically on the reproductive toxicity of PSNPs.

    • Relevant literature was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WOSCC), PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar using a combination of keywords such as (PSNPs OR PSNP OR PS-NP OR PS-NPs OR polystyrene nanoplastic OR polystyrene nanoplastics) AND (reproductive toxicity OR reproduction toxicity). A total of 285 papers were initially identified, and further screening was conducted based on titles and abstracts. The inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed journal publications of original research that focused on the reproductive toxicity of PSNPs in various organisms. Studies with low-quality animal experiments were excluded from the analysis. The literature search was completed on January 30, 2026, and the retrieved results were subjected to a systematic review and evaluation. Ultimately, 114 papers meeting the predefined criteria were included for subsequent relevant analyses (Fig. 2).

      Figure 2. 

      PRISMA flow diagram of the study selection process.

    • Bibliometric analysis is defined as a tool for statistical and quantitative analysis of research publications that can quantify the literature growth on specific subjects and the impact of individual research results, and it is a suitable choice for assessing trends in research activities[28].

      VOSviewer (v1.6.20; www.vosviewer.com) was used for cluster analysis to produce a network map. The co-occurrence network visualization of content is based on keywords, and the size of the circle is proportional to the frequency of occurrence in publications; that is, the larger the size, the more frequently the keyword appears in the selected articles. Keywords that co-occur frequently are situated close to each other. Accordingly, this analytical approach enables the visualization of research trends pertaining to the reproductive toxicity of PSNPs through the co-word network generated by this method.

    • We investigated the publication output of journals focusing on the reproductive toxicity of PSNPs. The publication status of studies on the reproductive toxicity of PSNPs is presented in Fig. 3a. Science of the Total Environment featured the largest number of relevant reports (17 articles), followed by Environmental Pollution (13 articles), while the Journal of Hazardous Materials and Chemosphere each had nine publications. Notably, the majority of these papers were published in environment-related journals, providing valuable insights for researchers when selecting appropriate journals for their future submissions on this topic. The journal analysis ranks journals by publication count, providing a quantitative overview of research activity in this field. However, publication count alone does not guarantee topic suitability; therefore, when selecting a target journal, authors should also consider the journal’s scope, recent publications on related topics, and other practical factors such as review speed and open access policies.

      Figure 3. 

      Network map of journals and authors on the reproductive toxicity of PSNPs. (a) Publication volume of articles on the reproductive toxicity of PSNPs across various journals, with darker colors indicating higher publication counts. (b) Publication output of authors in this field, where larger nodes indicate more publications, and lines represent collaborative relationships.

    • As shown in Fig. 3b, a total of 798 contributors have been involved in research on the reproductive toxicity of PSNPs. In terms of the number of papers and citation frequency, Chinese authors rank first, followed by researchers from South Korea. Tao Luo, Liping Zheng, and Zhiquan Liu are the top three researchers in this field. This is evidenced by their publication volume and citation count, which underscore their contributions to this field. The size of the nodes represents the number of papers, and the connections between nodes indicate the collaboration among researchers.

    • The co-occurrence network in Fig. 4a prominently identifies four primary research themes, which are distinctly clustered into separate groups. Cluster 1 (red) encompasses the keywords: microplastics, nanoplastics, reproductive toxicity, oxidative stress, apoptosis, autophagy, mechanism, spermatogenesis, and gut microbiota, with a core focus on the mechanisms of reproductive toxicity and its target effector organs. Cluster 2 (green) includes zebrafish (Danio rerio), marine environment, Daphnia magna, polystyrene nanoplastics, exposure, and accumulation, indicating that zebrafish and Caenorhabditis elegans (C. elegans) are the most commonly used model organisms, and that PSNPs have been the subject of extensive investigation in the field of microplastic-induced reproductive toxicity. In addition, neurotoxicity (cluster 3, yellow) and gene expression (cluster 4, blue) are frequently cited in the relevant literature, highlighting these as the current research hotspots in this domain.

      Figure 4. 

      Network map of keywords and subject areas in the field of reproductive toxicity of PSNPs. (a) Keyword co-occurrence map, where larger nodes indicate a higher frequency of mention, and connecting lines represent the co-occurrence associations between keywords. (b) Interdisciplinary intersection counts for PSNP-related reproductive toxicity research.

    • Analytical results reveal that the reproductive toxicity of PSNPs intersects with 41 distinct disciplines, confirming that this research topic is inherently interdisciplinary in nature. Among these disciplines (Fig. 4b), Environmental Sciences is the most closely related field with 139 publications, followed by Toxicology with 65 publications and Environmental Engineering with 27 publications. This disciplinary distribution reflects the diversity of the field and demonstrates the need for cross-disciplinary collaboration among environmental, toxicological, and engineering fields to conduct more comprehensive research and risk prevention on reproductive toxicity caused by PSNPs.

    • Declining fertility rates represent a critical public health concern[29], with impaired fecundity being a key driver of low birth rates. Accumulating evidence has indicated that environmental contaminants adversely affect reproductive health and pregnancy outcomes[30]. Recent studies have detected MNPs in neonatal meconium[18], human semen, and breast milk[31]. The male reproductive system is particularly susceptible to pollutants[32], and semen is more sensitive than blood to the accumulation of toxicants[33]. Research by Montano et al.[32] demonstrated the presence of MNPs in human semen and proposed that MNPs likely enter semen through the epididymis and seminal vesicles, which are prone to inflammation. Additionally, MNPs can cross the placental barrier and accumulate within placental tissue[20]. Most of the MNPs present in the placenta are composed of PE and PS. The presence of MNPs in the human placenta is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). Inverse associations between MNP exposure and birth outcomes have been observed in terms of birth weight, length, head circumference, and one-minute Apgar score[34], suggesting the potential impact of MNPs on fetal development.

      Miscarriage is defined as an abnormal pregnancy loss before viability, which is related to environmental pollutants. PSNP exposure leads to increased incidence of preterm birth and miscarriage, reduced litter size, and enhanced apoptosis in placental tissues, suggesting reproductive toxicity in mammals[35]. In chorionic villus tissue samples from pregnant women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage (RM), higher levels of PS plastic fragments were detected compared with controls, and the PS fragment content was positively correlated with miscarriage[36]. Meanwhile, PSNPs can cross the placental barrier and are readily internalized into trophoblast cells, inhibiting migration/invasion and migrasome formation in human trophoblast cells and inducing miscarriage[21]. Direct studies on the effects of PSNPs in humans are limited. Instead, toxicological evaluations were performed using cultured human cells and animal models. In different animal models, the male and female reproductive systems sustained distinct types of damage (Table 1).

      Table 1.  Comparison of sex-specific damage in PSNPs among different species

      Sex Species Route of exposure Affected signaling pathway Dose/size of exposure Outcome Ref.
      Male Mice Orally exposed PSNPs induce oxidative stress and affect the expression of genes associated with apoptosis and inflammation. 25-, 50-, and
      100-nm
      Damage the testicular structure and function, but also decrease sperm count and quality, ultimately reducing male fertility. [38]
      Rats Gavage Endocrine disruption 1, 3, 6, and
      10 mg/(kg·d)
      25-, 50-nm
      Reduce serum LH and testosterone (T) levels. [57]
      Zebrafish Water Meiosis and reproduction, DSB repair mechanisms. 5 mg/L of 45 nm Induced histopathological lesions in the testis. Sperm cells showed anomalous aggregation and condensed chromatin. Although the sperm remained viable, their motility was markedly impaired. [54]
      Oysters Configured as a suspension and exposed to the environment Perturbation of antioxidant defenses. 50 nm polystyrene beads with amine (50-NH2 beads) or carboxyl (50-COOH beads) functions Caused a decrease in the percentage of motile spermatozoa (66%) and in the velocity (38%). [41]
      Female Mice Gavage Endocrine disruption: E2 and P were elevated, while FSH and LH levels were diminished. 2.5% w/v, 10 mL
      50–90 nm
      Decreases the live birth rate and neonatal crown-rump length, embryo implantation sites, and uterine wet weight. [30]
      Rats Direct drinking Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways 0, 0.015, 0.15, and 1.5 mg/d
      0.5 μm
      Ovarian fibrosis in rats, along with apoptosis of granulosa cells, ultimately leads to a decline in ovarian reserve capacity. [58]
      Zebrafish Water PPAR signaling pathway, dysregulated lipid transport, binding and activity processes 5 mg/L
      80, 200, 500 nm
      Polycystic ovary syndrome-like ovulatory dysfunction. [59]
      Oysters Oral ingestion An alteration in glucocorticoid response, insulin pathway, and fatty-acid metabolism 14% ± 2% of the
      2 μm and 69% ± 6% of the 6 μm
      Significant decreases in oocyte number (−38%), diameter (−5%). [47]
      Fruit fly Mixed with the standard cornmeal fly feed Several metabolic routes were perturbed.
      These included steroidogenesis and the turnover of arginine and proline.
      At the systemic level, cholesterol homeostasis was affected.
      Longevity-related signalling also showed changes.
      Regulation of lipolysis in fat cells was disrupted. Ovarian steroid production and progesterone-driven oocyte maturation were similarly influenced.
      1, 10, 50, and
      100 mg/L
      100 nm
      Accumulate in the crop and gut and might even cross the intestinal barrier to reach ovarian tissue; the number of eggs produced and the eclosion rate decrease. [46]
    • The influence of PSNPs on the male reproductive system is mainly manifested in the testes, sperm motility, spermatogenic cells, the BTB, testosterone levels, etc. The BTB is one of the tightest blood-tissue barriers in the mammalian body, regulating the transport of nutrients (e.g., glucose, amino acids), essential molecules (e.g., hormones, electrolytes), and harmful toxicants (e.g., environmental pollutants, drugs, chemicals), while also serving as an immunological barrier[37].

      In the mouse (Mus musculus) model, PSNPs could disrupt the BTB and then enter the testicular tissue. Testosterone levels in serum were significantly decreased. PSNPs accumulated in the testes, induced oxidative stress, affected the expression of apoptosis- and inflammation-related genes, and led to damage to testicular microstructure and functions[38]. The environment for spermatogenesis is disrupted, resulting in a decline in sperm count and motility. At the same time, abnormal sperm morphology occurs, such as acrosome loss, cephalic (small head), acephalia (no head), cervical folding, and tailless. Exposure of male mice to PSNPs of varying sizes impaired their reproductive performance and even led to infertility. Notably, this study demonstrated that spermatozoa serve as a toxic target of PSNPs, precisely because PSNPs are sufficiently small to penetrate sperm cells and inhibit capacitation, thereby causing male infertility[39].

      Regarding the definition of sperm quality, motility (e.g., the percentage of motile spermatozoa and the swimming speed) and reproductive success rate are predominant[40]. In the oyster (Crassostrea virginica) model, oyster spermatozoa were exposed to PSNPs, and their fertilization ability was hindered, reducing the percentage of motile spermatozoa and velocity[41]. What is noteworthy is that PSNPs that simulated solar aging could lead to the downregulation of reproduction-related genes (SOX-8, SOX-E, Piwi1, TGF-β), delaying male gonadal development[42]. This might be closer to the result caused by the environment.

    • In addition to concerns about toxicity in the male reproductive system, potential toxicity to the female reproductive system has also received widespread attention. Interestingly, studies have shown that female mice are more susceptible to the adverse effects of MPs on reproductive capacity than male mice, indicating that there may be sex-specific differences in pollutant toxicity[31]. The antral follicle stage is a decisive determinant of female reproductive success. At this juncture, the follicle gains robust responsiveness to the pituitary hormones FSH and LH. This endocrine sensitivity initiates a cascade of events: granulosa cell proliferation, steroidogenesis, and antral cavity formation. These processes are essential for the oocyte to complete meiotic maturation and for the follicle to undergo ovulation. Thus, antral follicle integrity is fundamental to fertility[43]. Mechanistically, reduced antral follicle size serves as one of the first identifiable morphological endpoints for ovarian toxic injury. After ovulation, the corpus luteum becomes the primary source of progesterone. This steroid hormone primes the endometrium to receive the implanting embryo and preserves early pregnancy[44]. The number of eggs produced is the most representative indicator for evaluating ovarian function[45].

      In the mouse model, long-term exposure to PSNPs disrupted the ovarian function of female mice; embryo implantation numbers and uterine wet weights were significantly reduced. Consistent with this ovarian impairment, multiple adverse changes occurred in a dose-dependent manner: antral follicle size declined, corpus luteum density dropped, atretic follicle density rose, estrous cycles lengthened, and serum progesterone concentrations decreased[30].

      In the fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) model, PSNPs could accumulate in the crop and gut, and might even cross the intestinal barrier to reach ovarian tissue[46]. In a study by Sussarellu et al.[47], oysters exposed to PSNPs for 2 months exhibited significant reductions in oocyte number (−38%) and diameter (−5%). Consequently, offspring production and offspring development were reduced by 41% and 18%, respectively.

    • PSNPs not only damage parental reproductive organs but also exert intergenerational toxic effects on offspring development. In this context, intergenerational toxicity is defined as the adverse effects on offspring resulting from direct parental exposure to PSNPs. Exposure induces a marked decrease in fertilization success, impairs embryo and larval development, causes multiple malformations, and even leads to complete developmental arrest[48]. In the mouse model, PSNP exposure decreased the live birth rate and neonatal crown-rump length[30]. Chronic exposure to PSNPs even alters the sex ratio of Daphnia pulex neonates[49]. In oysters, offspring of parents subjected to exposure exhibited diminished movement. Additional observations included morphological defects, developmental cessation, and stunted growth. These phenotypes collectively indicate that PSNPs are a toxic insult affecting early-life neurobehavioral and somatic development[50]. In C. elegans, PSNP exposure increases embryonic and larval lethality[51]. The larval yield and larval development of offspring derived from exposed parents decreased by 41% and 18%[47].

    • Zebrafish are common model animals for the reproductive toxicity of PSNPs. As a vertebrate model, zebrafish feature rapid embryonic development, low maintenance cost, and high fecundity[52], which are similar to mammals in terms of physiology, development, metabolism, and signaling pathways. Their response to toxic substances can well predict the response of mammals[53]. In zebrafish, both male and female germ cells are directly affected to different degrees after exposure to PSNPs, and accumulation occurs within the germ cells. In males, PSNPs induce testicular histological alterations with delayed spermatogenesis, abnormal sperm clustering and chromatin compaction, and reduced motility of spermatozoa. Moreover, abnormal oocyte growth and follicular growth were observed in females[54].

      PSNPs exert adverse effects on the fish reproductive system both in the directly exposed generations and in their unexposed offspring. Studies exploring maternal exposure in P0 zebrafish and corresponding F1 offspring yielded consistent findings. Exposure to PSNPs drastically suppressed egg production in P0 females. PSNPs were also detected in multiple organs of both P0 and F1 zebrafish. Mechanistically, PSNPs disrupt the expression of hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis-related genes. This disruption impairs the reproductive performance of female P0 zebrafish, hinders F1 development, and disturbs endocrine homeostasis in F1 larvae[55]. Our previous research showed that long-term parental PSNPs exposure reduces offspring fertilization and survival rates, increases deformity rates, and induces premature embryo hatching[56]. It is worth noting that when observing the gene expression of the high-concentration PSNPs maternal exposure group, a decrease in foxl2a and an increase in sox9a were found, indicating that PSNPs have the potential to affect the sex differentiation of zebrafish, and further research is needed[55].

    • PSNPs pose a significant threat to reproductive capacity, with toxicity mediated through diverse molecular mechanisms, including oxidative stress, endocrine disruption, inflammation, autophagy, and apoptosis (Fig. 5). Clarifying these mechanisms plays a vital role in assessing the comprehensive hazards induced by PSNP exposure and establishing approaches to reduce their adverse outcomes on reproductive and systemic health.

      Figure 5. 

      Mechanisms of PSNPs-induced reproductive toxicity.

    • Oxidative stress is the core mechanism underlying the reproductive toxicity induced by PSNPs, which involves multiple cellular processes and signaling pathways. Understanding the mechanism by which oxidative stress induces reproductive toxicity of PSNPs is crucial for strategies to intervene and mitigate the adverse effects of PSNPs on reproductive and developmental health. Cellular function depends on a tightly regulated oxidant-antioxidant equilibrium. This balance, if perturbed, generates oxidative stress that impairs tissue performance. Therefore, maintaining redox stability is a prerequisite for normal organismal physiology[14]. PSNPs have been proven to trigger excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS)[60] and impair the redox balance. Studies have shown that PSNPs activate the cellular antioxidant defense system by increasing intracellular ROS levels, causing oxidative stress and activating Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) and P38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (p38 MAPK) signals. The MAPK signaling pathway constitutes a large superfamily including p38, JNK, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). Existing studies have confirmed that MAPK acts as a redox-sensitive signaling mediator. It is tightly linked to sperm maturation. p38 MAPK is involved in the synthesis of inflammatory cytokines at the transcription and translation levels, thus elevating their production in the testis, causing injury to seminiferous tubules and spermatogenic cell apoptosis. Subsequently, sperm motility and concentration decrease, the sperm abnormality rate increases, and spermatogenesis is disrupted[61]. With the increase in exposure concentration, the phosphorylation degree of p38 MAPK also increases accordingly. Phosphorylation of p38 MAPK initiates a signaling cascade. This cascade governs multiple physiological outcomes. These outcomes encompass inflammatory responses, lineage specification, senescence, cytokine secretion, and programmed death[62]. Therefore, in the male reproductive system, it is suggested that PSNPs impede energy supply, interfere with spermatogenesis, lead to a decline in sperm quality, cause deformities, and subsequently result in reproductive toxicity.

      The Hippo signaling pathway participates in both physiological and pathological ovarian aging. PSNP exposure triggers oxidative stress and disrupts Hippo pathway activity. These alterations further induce granulosa cell apoptosis and eventually impair mammalian fertility[63]. The Wingless/integrase-1 (Wnt) cascade is a central pathway governing multiple processes during embryonic development[64]. As an evolutionarily conserved signal transduction cascade, Wnt signaling relays signals via cell–cell interactions. It modulates cell fate, polarity, differentiation, and migration, thus orchestrating organogenesis and fetal development[65]. In females, exposure to PSNPs upregulated ovarian protein levels of Wnt, beta-catenin, and its phosphorylated form. This upregulation drove activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling axis. Pathway activation induced both fibrotic lesions and apoptosis of granulosa cells. Oxidative stress served as the trigger for apoptosis, and together these insults compromised ovarian reserve[58].

    • Testosterone, the most important androgen in males, plays an important role in spermatogenesis, and reduced testosterone levels are strongly correlated with testicular and Leydig cell dysfunction[66]. PSNP exposure impairs reproductive function by disrupting hormonal homeostasis via interference with the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis. Rat animal experiments demonstrated that high-dose PSNP treatment markedly reduced serum LH and testosterone (T) levels in male rats[57].

      In the female reproductive system, PSNPs can disrupt the synthesis of estrogen and progesterone, impairing ovarian function and pregnancy conditions[67]. The synthesis and metabolism of sex hormones regulate the expression of genes related to the HPG axis. Cyp19a1a is a key rate-limiting enzyme that converts androgen precursors into estrogen. PSNP exposure leads to the inhibition of the Cyp19a1a gene, resulting in a decrease in estrogen levels in zebrafish, which affects zebrafish reproduction, gonadal development, and sex differentiation[55].

    • Inflammation is closely associated with oxidative stress and elevated ROS. Exposure to PSNPs in mouse ovaries led to increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), indicating that PSNPs induce ovarian inflammation[68]. Furthermore, studies by Hou et al.[69] have demonstrated that oxidative stress triggers NLRP3 inflammasome-mediated activation of caspase-1, which subsequently promotes the formation of effector proinflammatory cytokines, ultimately resulting in ovarian inflammation and culminating in apoptosis of ovarian granulosa cells.

      The p38 MAPK kinase pathway shares many similarities with other MAPK kinase cascades, being associated with inflammation, cell growth, cell differentiation, and cell death[70]. Given its role in controlling the transcription and translation of inflammatory mediators, p38 MAPK is a potential target for anti-inflammatory therapies[71]. A study by Xie et al.[62] indicated that PSNP exposure can increase the production of pro-inflammatory factors (IL-1β, TNF-α, and IL-6) in the testicles of mice through the activation of the p38 MAPK signaling pathway, leading to a decline in sperm quality in mice.

    • As an evolutionarily conserved survival mechanism, autophagy represents the major intracellular catabolic process that degrades and recycles misfolded proteins and damaged organelles via autophagosomes[72]. Spermatogenesis, sperm motility, and fertilization all rely on abundant energy provision[73,74]. Mitochondria serve as the primary cellular energy generators. Their dysfunction impairs normal sperm physiological performance. Mitochondria can slow down the deterioration of tissue damage through autophagy during aging and damage, and excessive autophagy may lead to apoptosis[75]. Studies have shown that autophagy is associated with sperm acrosome injury induced by PSNPs. The acrosome is a large secretory vesicle in the head of sperm and plays a key role in gamete interactions. Its dysfunction is recognized as an important cause of fertilization failure and is an essential underlying mechanism of male reproductive damage[76]. Autophagy mediates PSNPs-induced acrosome damage by regulating two key acrosome-forming proteins (GOPC and DPY19L2) and reducing the expression of autophagy-related proteins (e.g., LC3B, Beclin1, ATG7, ATG16L, and ATG12). Notably, autophagy inhibition induced by PSNPs is involved in the depolymerization of vesicles associated with the Golgi apparatus. This represents a suppression of protective autophagy, resulting in an increase in irregular Golgi complexes, which ultimately leads to acrosome defects in spermatozoa[77].

    • Programmed cell death, also known as apoptosis, is an orderly, frequently energy-consuming process. It relies on the activation of cysteine proteases known as caspases and involves an intricate signaling cascade. This cascade transduces initial triggering signals and ultimately drives programmed cell death[78].

      Trophoblasts, the key cells at the maternal–fetal interface, play an essential role in placental implantation and reproduction[79]. In the study of the effect of PSNPs on human trophoblast cells, it was found that PSNP exposure upregulates cleaved caspase-3 or downregulates Bcl-2. By activating the Bcl-2/caspase-2/caspase-3 signaling pathway, it induced human trophoblast cell apoptosis through the mitochondrial pathway[36]. Similarly, mouse testicular Leydig cells could also undergo apoptosis through this pathway, causing damage to the male reproductive system[80]. Granulosa cells play an important role in the development and maturation of follicles[81]. PSNPs could cause apoptosis of granulosa cells through oxidative stress-triggered NLRP3/caspase-1 pathways, thereby reducing ovarian reserve in rats[69]. Yu et al.[22] found that PSNPs induced ROS production in C. elegans and regulated cell apoptosis via the CED-9/CED-4/CED-3 pathway.

      Apoptosis induced by PSNPs has also been observed in aquatic organisms. In zebrafish, staining with Acridine orange revealed higher apoptotic rates in the exposed cohorts. This was accompanied by elevated p53, caspase-3, and caspase-9, along with reduced Bcl-2 transcript levels. The oxidative stress elicited by PSNPs triggered the apoptotic machinery[82].

    • The combined reproductive toxicity of PSNPs with other pollutants is another research hotspot. MNPs have been confirmed to serve as carriers for these pollutants, and the combined reproductive toxicity may be more severe than that of a single pollutant. We should also pay attention to the impact of aging PSNPs on reproductive toxicity. The above situations may be closer to the toxic effects that PSNPs exert in daily life.

      Co-exposure to arsenic and PSNPs exacerbated oxidative stress, leading to disruption of the blood-testis barrier in mice[83]. Combined subchronic exposure to PSNPs and dibutyl phthalate (DBP) caused greater damage to the male reproductive system than exposure to each substance individually, leading to vascular congestion of the testes, Leydig cell hyperplasia and injury, disturbed testosterone production, widespread congestion of the tunica albuginea, decreased sperm development, and compromised antioxidant defense systems[84]. Combined exposure to PSNPs and diclofenac exacerbated oxidative stress, apoptosis, and lipid peroxidation, significantly upregulated the expression of TNF-α, COX-2, and IL-1β in adult zebrafish, reduced the hatching rate, and increased the malformation rate of larvae[85]. Exposure to PSNPs-UV resulted in reduced reproductive fitness in C. elegans and elevated mortality among progeny embryos and larvae, an effect mediated by the DAF-16 activated stress response[51]. The more severe reproductive damage caused by combined exposure and aged PSNPs suggests that they will become a major direction for future research.

    • Due to the large-scale production and waste of plastics, they are distributed, accumulate, and degrade into microplastics in nature. More and more studies have shown that MPs exist in human reproductive organs. In different animal models, PSNPs can cause inflammation, autophagy, apoptosis, and other related cascade reactions through oxidative stress, interfere with endocrine function, and affect sex hormones, thereby causing varying degrees of damage to the reproductive organs of both sexes and affecting their fertility. PSNPs also cause various damage to offspring through intergenerational toxicity passed from parents to offspring, such as unexplained miscarriage and deformity. For humans, in vitro and organoid models have shown that PSNPs have toxic effects on human-derived germ cells, suggesting that PSNPs have potential reproductive and intergenerational toxic effects on humans.

      Recently, research on the toxicity of microplastic particles and their underlying mechanisms has attracted considerable attention. Beyond conventional analytical approaches, a relatively novel strategy involves the application of bioimaging modalities. In particular, aggregation-induced emission (AIE)-based bioimaging enables quantitative analysis of the in vivo biodistribution and barrier transport of MNPs, allowing researchers to establish direct and spatially resolved causal relationships. This provides new insights and perspectives for investigating the toxicological pathways of MPs and NPs[86]. Additionally, focusing on tracing probes for fluorescent nanoparticles, Wang et al. uniformly embedded tetraphenylethene aggregation-induced emission luminogens into the polystyrene backbone without altering the intrinsic physicochemical properties of the nanoparticles. Through surface charge modulation, the probes were also endowed with the capability of targeted binding to the extracellular matrix. This controllable synthesis strategy can serve as a template for the preparation of biocompatible labeled polystyrene nanoparticles specifically for reproductive toxicology, thereby facilitating subsequent accurate quantification of the in vivo accumulation of fluorescent nanoparticles[87,88]. Since the first detection of MPs in the maternal placenta, subsequent studies have found that PSNPs can interfere with endocrine function in human primary placental cells, leading to reduced release of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG). This reduction may increase the risk of Down syndrome in infants and early preeclampsia, thereby contributing to adverse pregnancy outcomes.

      Existing data from toxicology and sparse epidemiology link PSNPs to redox imbalances, proinflammatory states, immune deviations, and endocrine disturbances. However, a causal nexus in people has yet to be established. Definitive human evidence remains unavailable. Prevalence estimates and risk assessments are constrained by ethical limitations. Importantly, the detection of PSNPs in animal models does not equate to a quantifiable internal exposure dose. Moreover, animal studies predominantly employ pristine spherical polystyrene particles at concentrations often exceeding realistic environmental levels, and the observed effects do not imply direct causal links with adverse clinical outcomes in humans. The biologically relevant internal dose remains largely unknown.

      To address these limitations, there is an urgent need for internationally harmonized experimental protocols, rigorous contamination control measures, and standardized reporting systems to ensure the reliability of biomonitoring and to clarify the potential health implications of PSNP exposure in humans. The development of robust, standardized methods specifically validated for the detection of NPs in environmental and biological matrices remains a critical unmet need. Advances in detection technologies, such as artificial intelligence-assisted analysis and AIE techniques, hold promise as transformative tools in mechanistic toxicology. These approaches may enable more sensitive and specific quantification of NPs in human tissues. Finally, in the future, more attention should be paid to measures and strategies for reducing the reproductive and developmental toxicity of MNPs, such as the production of new environmentally friendly materials that can remove or replace plastics and the research and development of related technologies, strict control of the production and discharge of plastics, and public health publicity and education to make people pay attention to and understand the classification of plastic waste and the scientific treatment of plastic waste, thereby reducing exposure to microplastics in the environment.

    • In conclusion, this review elaborates on the severity of MP pollution and the significant impact of one of the most common types of MPs-PSNPs on the reproductive and developmental health of multiple species. Based on recent research, our analysis indicates that PSNPs can accumulate in the reproductive organs of different animal models, causing varying degrees of damage to the reproductive organs and germ cells of both sexes and affecting the developmental health of offspring. The molecular mechanisms of these effects, including oxidative stress, endocrine disruption, inflammation, autophagy, and apoptosis, highlight the complexity and multi-faceted nature of the reproductive toxicity of MPs. In future research, we need to focus on human epidemiological investigations, the combined effects of PSNPs and other pollutants, and the toxic effects of aging PSNPs. At the same time, efforts should be made to reduce plastic production and pollution, raise public awareness of the toxic hazards of MPs, carry out health education, and minimize human exposure to these pollutants.

    • All experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of South China (Permit No. 11000252-2).

      • We thank Biorender (www.biorender.com) for providing the graphical tools used in this reivew.

      • The authors confirm their contributions to the paper as follows: Liyao Huang: investigation, methodology, data curation, and writing – original draft. Wanjing Liu: writing – review and editing. Chunhua Zhan: conceptualization, supervision, writing – review and editing, and resources. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

      • The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

      • The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

      • Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.

      • Copyright: © 2026 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (5)  Table (1) References (88)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Huang L, Liu W, Zhan C. 2026. Polystyrene nanoplastics as emerging reproductive toxicants: sex-specific effects, offspring risks, and molecular mechanisms. New Contaminants 2: e025 doi: 10.48130/newcontam-0026-0022
    Huang L, Liu W, Zhan C. 2026. Polystyrene nanoplastics as emerging reproductive toxicants: sex-specific effects, offspring risks, and molecular mechanisms. New Contaminants 2: e025 doi: 10.48130/newcontam-0026-0022

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return