Search
2026 Volume 2026
Article Contents
RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

Diverging regional inequalities in childhood diabetes, 1990–2023: a GBD 2023-based analysis

  • # Authors contributed equally: Kexin Zhang, Chengxia Kan

More Information
  • Childhood diabetes continues to rise, with wide variation across regions and income levels. We performed a cross-sectional analysis using Global Burden of Disease 2023 estimates for children aged 0–14 years across super regions, regions, and countries from 1990 to 2023. The primary objective was to characterize regional inequalities in incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years, and to assess whether these inequalities are likely to persist in the future. Age-standardized incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life year rates were estimated per 100,000 population with 95% uncertainty intervals. Regional and national comparisons, temporal trend analyses, and socioeconomic gradient analyses were employed as core analyses. Risk factor attribution, the Quality of Care Index, Shapley additive explanations-based predictor contribution analysis, and Bayesian age-period-cohort forecasting were used as supportive analyses to interpret risk-attributable mortality patterns, care-related performance gaps, demographic and temporal contributors, and future incidence trajectories. From 1990 to 2023, childhood diabetes incidence increased in most regions, while mortality and disability declined overall. High-income North America had the highest incidence in 2023, whereas Western Sub-Saharan Africa had the greatest mortality and disability burden. Finland had the highest incidence, Qatar, Chile, and South Korea showed rapid incidence increases, and Nigeria had the highest mortality burden. Projections suggested stabilizing incidence in the United States but continued increases in China, India, Poland, Finland, and Qatar. Childhood diabetes shows persistent regional inequalities, highlighting the need for earlier diagnosis, reliable insulin access, and stronger pediatric diabetes systems in resource-limited settings.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Mayer-Davis EJ, Lawrence JM, Dabelea D, Divers J, Isom S, et al. 2017. Incidence trends of type 1 and type 2 diabetes among youths, 2002–2012. New England Journal of Medicine 376(15):1419−1429 doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1610187

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Lawrence JM, Divers J, Isom S, Saydah S, Imperatore G, et al. 2021. Trends in prevalence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents in the US, 2001-2017. JAMA 326(8):717 doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.11165

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Lim LL, Jones S, Cikomola JC, Hivert MF, Misra S. 2025. Understanding the drivers and consequences of early-onset type 2 diabetes. The Lancet 405(10497):2327−2340 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01012-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Gregg EW, Hora I, Benoit SR. 2019. Resurgence in diabetes-related complications. JAMA 321(19):1867−1868 doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.3471

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Salama M, Balagopal B, Fennoy I, Kumar S. 2023. Childhood obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease risk. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 108(12):3051−3066 doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad361

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Bjornstad P, Drews KL, Caprio S, Gubitosi-Klug R, Nathan DM, et al. 2022. Long-term complications in youth-onset type 2 diabetes. Yearbook of Paediatric Endocrinology 385(5):416−426 doi: 10.1530/ey.19.12.3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Zhang K, Kan C, Han F, Zhang J, Ding C, et al. 2023. Global, regional, and national epidemiology of diabetes in children from 1990 to 2019. JAMA Pediatrics 177(8):837 doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.2029

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Kan C, Zhang K, Han F, Hou N, Sun X. 2025. Updated insights on childhood diabetes epidemiology 2019-2021 and projections to 2045. JAMA Pediatrics 179(2):205 doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.5105

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Magge SN, Wolf RM, Pyle L, Brown EA, Benavides VC, et al. 2022. The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic is associated with a substantial rise in frequency and severity of presentation of youth-onset type 2 diabetes. The Journal of Pediatrics 251:51−59. e2 doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.08.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Rahmati M, Yon DK, Lee SW, Udeh R, McEvoy M, et al. 2023. New-onset type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents as postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Journal of Medical Virology 95(6):e28833 doi: 10.1002/jmv.28833

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Barrett CE, Koyama AK, Alvarez P, Chow W, Lundeen EA, et al. 2022. Risk for newly diagnosed diabetes >30 days after SARS-CoV-2 infection among persons aged <18 years - United States, March 1, 2020-June 28, 2021. MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 71(2):59−65 doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7102e2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Patterson CC, Harjutsalo V, Rosenbauer J, Neu A, Cinek O, et al. 2019. Trends and cyclical variation in the incidence of childhood type 1 diabetes in 26 European centres in the 25year period 1989–2013: a multicentre prospective registration study. Diabetologia 62(3):408−417 doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4763-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Kamrath C, Rosenbauer J, Eckert AJ, Siedler K, Bartelt H, et al. 2022. Incidence of type 1 diabetes in children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: results from the DPV registry. Diabetes Care 45(8):1762−1771 doi: 10.2337/dc21-0969

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] GBD 2023 Causes of Death Collaborators. 2025. Global burden of 292 causes of death in 204 countries and territories and 660 subnational locations, 1990-2023: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023. The Lancet 406:1811−1872 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01917-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] GBD 2023 Disease and Injury and Risk Factor Collaborators. 2025. Burden of 375 diseases and injuries, risk-attributable burden of 88 risk factors, and healthy life expectancy in 204 countries and territories, including 660 subnational locations, 1990-2023: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023. The Lancet 406:1873−1922 doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(25)01637-X

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] GBD 2015 Healthcare Access and Quality Collaborators. 2017. Healthcare Access and Quality Index based on mortality from causes amenable to personal health care in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2015: a novel analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet 390:231−266 doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30818-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Ordunez P, Martinez R, Soliz P, Giraldo G, Mujica OJ, et al. 2019. Rheumatic heart disease burden, trends, and inequalities in the Americas, 1990–2017: a population-based study. The Lancet Global Health 7(10):e1388−e1397 doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30360-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Hankey BF, Ries LA, Kosary CL, Feuer EJ, Merrill RM, et al. 2000. Partitioning linear trends in age-adjusted rates. Cancer Causes & Control 11(1):31−35 doi: 10.1023/A:1008953201688

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Pan Y, Liu Q, Zhang N, Peng S, Li X, et al. 2025. Global assessment of leukemia care quality: insights from the quality of care index (QCI) from 1990 to 2021. eClinicalMedicine 79:102996 doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102996

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Liang D, Wang L, Zhong P, Lin J, Chen L, et al. 2025. Perspective: global burden of iodine deficiency: insights and projections to 2050 using XGBoost and SHAP. Advances in Nutrition 16(3):100384 doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2025.100384

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Liang D, Wang L, Liu S, Li S, Zhou X, et al. 2024. Global incidence of diarrheal diseases—an update using an interpretable predictive model based on XGBoost and SHAP: a systematic analysis. Nutrients 16(18):3217 doi: 10.3390/nu16183217

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Liu Z, Xu K, Jiang Y, Cai N, Fan J, et al. 2021. Global trend of aetiology-based primary liver cancer incidence from 1990 to 2030: a modelling study. International Journal of Epidemiology 50(1):128−142 doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa196

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Broyles ST, Denstel KD, Church TS, Chaput JP, Fogelholm M, et al. 2015. The epidemiological transition and the global childhood obesity epidemic. International Journal of Obesity Supplements 5(2):S3−S8 doi: 10.1038/ijosup.2015.12

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Guvenc F, Danska JS. 2025. The intestinal microbiome in type 1 diabetes: bridging early childhood exposures with translational advances. Current Opinion in Immunology 94:102553 doi: 10.1016/j.coi.2025.102553

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Keskesiadou GN, Tsokkou S, Konstantinidis I, Georgaki MN, Sioga A, et al. 2024. Endocrine-disrupting chemicals and the development of diabetes mellitus type 1: a 5-year systematic review. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25(18):10111 doi: 10.3390/ijms251810111

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Lugar M, Eugster A, Achenbach P, von dem Berge T, Berner R, et al. 2023. SARS-CoV-2 infection and development of islet autoimmunity in early childhood. JAMA 330(12):1151−1160 doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.16348

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Hemat Jouy S, Tonchev H, Mostafa SM, Mahmoud AM. 2025. Post-COVID metabolic fallout: a growing threat of new-onset and exacerbated diabetes. Biomedicines 13(6):1482 doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13061482

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Cavanagh A, Adhikary S, Denny S. 2025. Psychosocial well-being of adolescents and young adults living with chronic illness. Internal Medicine Journal 55(11):1814−1823 doi: 10.1111/imj.70198

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Zhao X, Jiang L, Sun W, Tang S, Kang X, et al. 2025. Understanding the interplay between COVID-19 and diabetes: insights for the post-pandemic era. Frontiers in Endocrinology 16:1599969 doi: 10.3389/fendo.2025.1599969

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Singh AK, Khunti K. 2022. COVID-19 and diabetes. Annual Review of Medicine 73:129−147 doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-042220-011857

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Wu Z, Wang J, Ullah R, Chen M, Huang K, et al. 2024. Covid 19 and diabetes in children: advances and strategies. Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome 16(1):28 doi: 10.1186/s13098-024-01267-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Price AM, Maayan T, Wake MA, Hiscock H. 2014. Is glycosylated haemoglobin associated with psychosocial stress in non-diabetic 6-year-olds? Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health 50(2):153−157 doi: 10.1111/jpc.12415

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Rewers M. 2025. Health economic considerations of screening for early type 1 diabetes. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism 27(S6):69−77 doi: 10.1111/dom.16522

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Castellanos L, Tuffaha M, Koren D, Levitsky LL. 2020. Management of diabetic ketoacidosis in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Pediatric Drugs 22(4):357−367 doi: 10.1007/s40272-020-00397-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Ohman-Hanson R, Alonso GT, Pyle L, McDonough R, Clements M. 2024. Management of diabetic ketoacidosis in children: Does early insulin glargine help improve outcomes? Journal of Diabetes 16(8):e13597 doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.13597

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Henry Z, Villar Fimbel S, Bendelac N, Perge K, Thivolet C. 2024. Beneficial effects of automated insulin delivery over one-year follow-up in real life for youths and adults with type 1 diabetes irrespective of patient characteristics. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism 26(2):557−566 doi: 10.1111/dom.15344

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Holt RIG, DeVries JH, Hess-Fischl A, Hirsch IB, Kirkman MS, et al. 2021. The management of type 1 diabetes in adults. a consensus report by the American diabetes association (ADA) and the European association for the study of diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 44(11):2589−2625 doi: 10.2337/dci21-0043

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Schiel R, Voigt U, Ross I, Braun A, Rillig A, et al. 2006. Structured diabetes therapy and education improves the outcome of patients with insulin treated diabetes mellitus. Experimental and Clinical Endocrinology & Diabetes 114(1):18−27 doi: 10.1055/s-2005-873079

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Zhang K, Kan C, Han F, Li X, Zheng T, et al. 2026. Diverging regional inequalities in childhood diabetes, 1990–2023: a GBD 2023-based analysis. Pediatric Diabetes 2026: e001 doi: 10.48130/pedi-0026-0002
    Zhang K, Kan C, Han F, Li X, Zheng T, et al. 2026. Diverging regional inequalities in childhood diabetes, 1990–2023: a GBD 2023-based analysis. Pediatric Diabetes 2026: e001 doi: 10.48130/pedi-0026-0002

Figures(5)

Article Metrics

Article views(400) PDF downloads(160)

Research Article   Open Access    

Diverging regional inequalities in childhood diabetes, 1990–2023: a GBD 2023-based analysis

Pediatric Diabetes  2026 Article number: e001  (2026)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Childhood diabetes continues to rise, with wide variation across regions and income levels. We performed a cross-sectional analysis using Global Burden of Disease 2023 estimates for children aged 0–14 years across super regions, regions, and countries from 1990 to 2023. The primary objective was to characterize regional inequalities in incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life years, and to assess whether these inequalities are likely to persist in the future. Age-standardized incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted life year rates were estimated per 100,000 population with 95% uncertainty intervals. Regional and national comparisons, temporal trend analyses, and socioeconomic gradient analyses were employed as core analyses. Risk factor attribution, the Quality of Care Index, Shapley additive explanations-based predictor contribution analysis, and Bayesian age-period-cohort forecasting were used as supportive analyses to interpret risk-attributable mortality patterns, care-related performance gaps, demographic and temporal contributors, and future incidence trajectories. From 1990 to 2023, childhood diabetes incidence increased in most regions, while mortality and disability declined overall. High-income North America had the highest incidence in 2023, whereas Western Sub-Saharan Africa had the greatest mortality and disability burden. Finland had the highest incidence, Qatar, Chile, and South Korea showed rapid incidence increases, and Nigeria had the highest mortality burden. Projections suggested stabilizing incidence in the United States but continued increases in China, India, Poland, Finland, and Qatar. Childhood diabetes shows persistent regional inequalities, highlighting the need for earlier diagnosis, reliable insulin access, and stronger pediatric diabetes systems in resource-limited settings.

    • Childhood diabetes is an increasingly prevalent chronic disease with lifelong consequences[1,2]. Early-onset diabetes exposes children to prolonged hyperglycemia, increasing the risk of cardiovascular, renal, and neurologic complications later in life[36]. Over recent decades, its epidemiology has evolved due to demographic transitions, environmental stressors, and expanded diagnostic capacity[7]. Understanding these transitions is essential to guide equitable prevention and care.

      Our previous analyses using Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 data revealed a persistent rise in childhood diabetes incidence from 1990 to 2019, alongside steady declines in mortality and disability-adjusted life years (DALYs)[7]. High-income regions exhibited the highest incidence, whereas low socio-demographic index (SDI) regions bore the heaviest mortality burden, underscoring deep inequities in pediatric care. The GBD 2021 update further identified that South Asia had the highest number of incident cases, whereas Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa remained the region with the highest mortality and DALY rates[8]. However, these aggregate estimates may obscure substantial intra-regional heterogeneity, where rapid diagnostic expansion, environmental exposures, and healthcare access interact in complex ways.

      Since 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has reshaped childhood diabetes patterns[9]. Viral triggers, lifestyle disruption, and psychosocial stress may have accelerated onset in predisposed children, while improved screening, insulin availability, and acute care helped lower mortality[1013]. Together, these changes suggest that the post-pandemic era may represent a transitional phase in the epidemiologic trajectory of childhood diabetes[13].

      The updated GBD 2023 database incorporates expanded national registry data and enhanced regional modeling, improving estimate consistency and cross-country comparability[14,15]. The central question of this study was how regional inequalities in childhood diabetes burden changed from 1990 to 2023 and whether these inequalities may persist in the future. Therefore, we focused on temporal trends, regional and national differences, and socioeconomic gradients in incidence, mortality, and DALYs. Additional supportive analyses were used to contextualize risk-attributable mortality, care-related gaps, demographic and temporal contributors, and future incidence trajectories. This integrated framework aimed to clarify where childhood diabetes burden is increasing, where mortality and disability remain concentrated, and which care-related gaps may require greater attention.

    • We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using data from the GBD 2023 study, which provides internally consistent estimates of disease burden for GBD countries and territories from 1990 to 2023[15]. All analyses were conducted in accordance with relevant GBD data use and publication requirements. Childhood diabetes was defined as diabetes mellitus among individuals aged 0–14 years, based on GBD diagnostic criteria; in GBD 2023, total diabetes estimates for individuals younger than 15 years were based on the type 1 diabetes mellitus model. Data on incidence, mortality, and DALYs were derived from the Global Health Data Exchange. Estimates were generated using DisMod-MR 2.1, a Bayesian meta-regression model that synthesizes multiple data sources to ensure internal consistency across age, sex, location, and year. This study followed the STROBE guideline. Because only publicly available, de-identified, and aggregated GBD data were used, ethical approval and informed consent were not required.

      The analytical framework was structured to distinguish core analyses from supportive analyses. Regional and national burden comparisons, temporal trend analyses, and socioeconomic gradient analyses were used to assess geographic heterogeneity, temporal changes, and development-related disparities in incidence, mortality, and DALYs. Risk factor attribution, Quality of Care Index (QCI) construction, Shapley additive explanations (SHAP)-based interpretation, and Bayesian age-period-cohort (BAPC) forecasting were used to contextualize risk-attributable mortality, care-related gaps, demographic and temporal contributors, and possible future incidence trajectories.

    • Countries and territories were categorized according to the GBD 2023 super-regional and regional classification system to ensure consistency across geographic comparisons. Detailed region and country groupings are provided in Supplementary Method 1.

    • Age-standardized incidence rates, age-standardized mortality rates, and age-standardized DALY rates were expressed per 100,000 population using the GBD 2023 standard population. Age standardization was used to allow comparisons across locations and years independent of differences in population age structure. All estimates were reported with 95% uncertainty intervals (UIs).

    • The relationship between the SDI and the burden of childhood diabetes in 2023 was assessed across GBD regions. The SDI (range, 0−1) is a composite indicator reflecting income per capita, educational attainment, and fertility rate[15]. Scatterplots with LOESS curves and 95% confidence intervals were used to visualize associations between SDI and age-standardized incidence, mortality, and DALYs rates. Spearman correlation analysis assessed monotonic relationships.

    • Joinpoint regression (Joinpoint Regression Program, version 5.0, National Cancer Institute, USA) was applied to assess temporal trends in ASR and detect significant inflection points. A log-linear model was fitted for each location and sex, with up to five joinpoints allowed and a minimum segment length of five years. For each segment, the annual percent change (APC) was estimated as (e^β − 1) × 100%, where β is the slope. The average annual percent change (AAPC) was calculated as the weighted mean of segment-specific APCs[16,17].

    • Spatial patterns of change were visualized using choropleth maps of the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) in ASRs from 1990 to 2023. EAPC was derived from the regression model ln(ASR) = α + β × year + ε, where EAPC = 100 × (e^β − 1). Each EAPC value was accompanied by a 95% CI derived from the standard error of the regression coefficient. Maps used color scales in which red indicates increasing and blue decreasing trends, ensuring color-blind accessibility[18].

    • Risk-attributable mortality was assessed using the GBD 2023 comparative risk assessment framework. Population-attributable fractions and corresponding 95% UIs were derived from GBD-defined exposure distributions, theoretical minimum risk exposure levels, and relative risk functions. Regional and temporal variations in attributable mortality were summarized from 1990 to 2023.

    • The QCI was constructed as a supportive analysis to provide a care-related interpretation of regional inequalities. Descriptive burden estimates identify where mortality and DALYs are concentrated but do not directly indicate whether these patterns are accompanied by weaker diagnosis, survival, or continuity of care. Therefore, QCI was used to integrate years of life lost to years lived with disability ratio (YLR), disability-adjusted life years to prevalence ratio (DPR), mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR), and prevalence-to-incidence ratio (PIR) into a composite care-performance framework. Each indicator was standardized by z-transformation, and principal component analysis (PCA) was used to derive the composite score. Higher QCI values were interpreted as reflecting better care-related performance, including diagnosis, treatment, survival, and long-term management. Correlation and PCA analyses were used to assess the internal coherence and dimensional structure of QCI[19]. The added value of QCI was to assess whether regions with higher mortality and DALY burden also showed evidence of weaker care-related performance, rather than to define a separate disease burden endpoint Supplementary Method 2.

    • The association between socioeconomic development and temporal changes in childhood diabetes burden was further examined using the Human Development Index (HDI) and EAPC values. The HDI data were obtained from the United Nations Development Programme. Bubble plots visualized these relationships, with bubble size representing the number of cases in 2023. LOESS regression (95% CI) and Spearman correlation assessed nonlinear and monotonic associations.

    • XGBoost models with SHAP interpretation were used as a supportive analysis to summarize demographic and temporal contributors to childhood diabetes burden in Western Sub-Saharan Africa and High-Income North America. Predictors included year, age group, sex, and log-transformed population size, and outcomes included incidence and DALY rates. Model performance was evaluated using ten-fold cross-validation, mean absolute error, and R2. SHAP values were used to summarize the relative contribution of each predictor to model predictions and to visualize nonlinear patterns[20,21].

    • Future incidence trends were projected using a BAPC model that captures age, period, and cohort effects. The model employed a Poisson likelihood with log-linear predictors and second-order random-walk prior to ensure smooth temporal patterns. Posterior estimates were obtained through Integrated Nested Laplace Approximation (INLA), and model adequacy was evaluated using the Deviance Information Criterion and posterior predictive checks. Age-standardized incidence rates from 2024 to 2045 were forecast with 95% credible intervals[22].

    • All statistical analyses and visualizations were performed using R software (version 4.3.3; R Foundation for Statistical Computing). Age-standardized rates were used to quantify the burden of childhood diabetes across regions and selected countries.

    • From 1990 to 2023, childhood diabetes incidence increased across most regions, while mortality and DALYs showed overall declining trends. High-income regions had the largest number of incident cases and rate. Compared with the 2021 GBD dataset, which identified South Asia as having the largest number of cases, the 2023 update identified High-Income North America as the region with the highest number of incident cases and the highest incidence rate, reporting 24,098 (11,817–49,989) new cases and an incidence rate of 36.54 (17.92–75.80) per 100,000 (Fig. 1; Supplementary Fig. S1 and Supplementary Table S1). Within this region, children aged 5–9 years contributed the largest proportion of new diagnoses, and a consistent male predominance was observed across all age groups (Supplementary Figs S2, S3). The most rapid increase in case numbers occurred in Sub-Saharan Africa (3.56-fold), particularly in Eastern Sub-Saharan Africa (5.10-fold), whereas Central Europe exhibited the fastest rise in ASIR (Supplementary Table S1). Spearman correlation analysis revealed a significant positive association between the SDI and incidence (r = 0.60, p < 0.001; n = 84), indicating that higher SDI values were linked to higher incidence rates (Supplementary Fig. S4).

      Figure 1. 

      Regional burden of childhood diabetes (ages 0–14 years) in 1990 and 2023. (a) Number of incident cases and incidence rate (per 100,000 population); (b) Number of deaths and mortality rate; (c) Number of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) and DALY rate (per 100,000 population).

      Sub-Saharan Africa remained the hotspot for childhood diabetes mortality and disability burden. Western Sub-Saharan Africa reported the highest number of deaths in 2023, reaching 2,202 (845–3,670), along with the highest mortality rate of 0.98 (0.38–1.64) per 100,000 (Fig. 1; Supplementary Fig. S1 and Supplementary Table S2). Mortality was greatest among children under 5 years, and boys exhibited slightly higher rates than girls across all age groups (Supplementary Figs S2, S3). During 2019–2023, the number of deaths increased most rapidly in Oceania, whereas Central Asia recorded the fastest rise in ASMR (Supplementary Table S2). Spearman correlation analysis demonstrated a significant negative association between SDI and mortality (r = –0.83, p < 0.001; n = 84), indicating that higher SDI values were associated with lower death rates (Supplementary Fig. S4).

      Similarly, Sub-Saharan Africa exhibited the greatest DALYs burden, with Western Sub-Saharan Africa recording 187,188 (71,993–313,001) DALYs and an ASDR of 83.58 (32.15–139.76) per 100,000 in 2023 (Fig. 1; Supplementary Fig. S1 and Supplementary Table S3). The DALYs burden was concentrated among children under 5 years, with boys more affected than girls (Supplementary Figs S2, S3). High-income North America showed the fastest increase in both DALYs and ASDR between 2019 and 2023 (Supplementary Table S3). SDI remained negatively correlated with DALYs (r = –0.81, p < 0.001; n = 84), highlighting the persistent inequality between socioeconomic development and disease burden (Supplementary Fig. S4).

    • Given that high-income North America exhibited the highest incidence, we further examined its temporal patterns. From 1990 to 2023, joinpoint regression identified four distinct phases. The ASIR rose sharply from 1990 to 2000 (APC, 4.98; 95% CI, 4.81–5.17) and continued increasing from 2000 to 2010 (APC, 3.60, 3.50–3.72). A temporary decline followed between 2010 and 2015 (APC, –1.39, –1.67 to –1.22), before rebounding modestly after 2015 (APC, 0.61, 0.29–1.00). Sex-stratified analyses revealed similar trajectories for both sexes. Among females, ASIR rose during 1990–1999 (APC, 5.15), 1999-2004 (APC, 4.08), and 2004–2010 (APC, 3.03), declined from 2010–2015 (APC, –1.38), and then stabilized (APC, 0.20). Males displayed comparable phases, with marked increases from 1990–1999 (APC, 4.85) and 1999–2010 (APC, 3.86), followed by a decline (APC, –1.27) and slight rebound (APC, 0.94). Across the entire period, the AAPC remained significantly positive (2.51, 2.44–2.57; p < 0.001), slightly higher among males (2.62) than females (2.36). Despite transient reductions in the early 2010s, the long-term trend indicates a persistent rise in incidence across High-income North America (Supplementary Fig. S5a).

      Western Sub-Saharan Africa, which bore the highest mortality and DALYs burden, showed a markedly different pattern. Both ASMR and ASDR exhibited a single joinpoint in the early 2000s, signaling an accelerated decline. The ASMR decreased moderately during 1990–1999 (APC, –1.08, –1.36 to –0.73) and more steeply thereafter (APC, –2.31, –2.38 to –2.24). A similar trend was observed for ASDR (APC, –1.07 early; –2.30 after 1999). Females experienced a slower initial reduction, whereas males showed a steeper and more consistent decline. Overall, both ASMR and ASDR fell significantly (AAPC, –1.97 and –1.96; p < 0.001), indicating sustained improvement in survival and disability outcomes despite limited resources (Supplementary Fig. S5bS5c).

    • Substantial national heterogeneity was also observed. In earlier GBD datasets (2019 and 2021), India reported the highest number of new childhood diabetes cases, but in 2023, the United States ranked first, with 21,960 (10,641–45,402) new cases. Finland recorded the highest incidence rate at 59.84 (39.13–106.02) per 100,000. From 1990 to 2023, Qatar, Chile, and South Korea showed the fastest increases in incidence (EAPCs 5.85, 5.58, and 5.47), while Poland had the largest rise in Central Europe (EAPC 4.89) (Fig. 2). Nigeria had the highest mortality in 2023, both in number (1,161; 338–2,079) and rate (1.96; 0.83–3.36), whereas Uzbekistan exhibited the steepest increase in Central Asia (EAPC 1.01) (Supplementary Fig. S6). In 2023, Nigeria had the highest DALYs (98,959; 28,787–177,686), and Niger surpassed Tokelau with the highest DALYs rate (166.21; 70.03–283.25). From 1990 to 2023, Poland showed the largest DALYs increase (EAPC 2.25), while the United States had the highest rise among high-income regions (EAPC 1.40) (Supplementary Fig. S7).

      Figure 2. 

      National distribution of the estimated annual percentage change (EAPC) in the incidence rate of childhood diabetes from 1990 to 2023. Map created using a base map from the Resource and Environment Science and Data Center (RESDC, www.resdc.cn) and data from the GBD Study 2023. (a) West Asia; (b) the Americas; (c) East Asia; (d) Europe. EAPC reflects the average annual change in incidence rate over time, with red indicating an increasing trend and blue indicating a declining trend.

    • Childhood diabetes mortality was primarily driven by metabolic (high fasting plasma glucose, HFPG) and environmental risks (low and high temperatures). In 2023, HFPG-related mortality was highest in Western Sub-Saharan Africa and increased most in Central Asia. High-temperature mortality was concentrated in Western Sub-Saharan Africa and rose fastest in Eastern Europe, whereas low-temperature mortality peaked in Oceania but declined elsewhere, with minimal reduction in Central Asia. From 1990 to 2023, East Asia achieved the largest decreases across all three risk categories (Fig. 3). These results suggest that metabolic and environmental risk-attributable mortality patterns may contribute to regional differences in childhood diabetes deaths.

      Figure 3. 

      Changes in risk factor–attributable burden of childhood diabetes deaths across selected regions from 1990 to 2023.

    • QCI was used to assess whether higher mortality and disability coincided with weaker care-related performance. In 2023, marked disparities in the QCI for childhood diabetes were observed across regions. High-Income North America showed uniformly high QCI values (> 70), consistent with better care-related performance, including diagnosis, survival, and long-term management. In contrast, Western Sub-Saharan Africa exhibited substantially lower and more heterogeneous QCI scores (20–70), indicating persistent inequities in pediatric diabetes care (Fig. 4).

      Figure 4. 

      Regional quality of childhood diabetes care based on the Quality of Care Index (QCI) in Western Sub-Saharan Africa (a) and High-Income North America (b). Distribution of QCI; correlation matrix illustrating the relationships among YLR, DPR, MIR, and PIR; and principal component analysis identifying two major components representing disease burden (PC1) and management quality (PC2).

      In Western Sub-Saharan Africa, YLR, DPR, and MIR were strongly correlated (r = 0.998–1.000; p < 0.001), while PIR showed weaker inverse associations (r = −0.35 to −0.39; p = 0.01). PCA explained 99.98% of total variance, with PC1 (79.82%) representing disease burden and PC2 (20.16%) reflecting survival. These findings underscore pronounced disparities between acute and chronic care quality across regions.

      In High-Income North America, YLR, DPR, and MIR were again highly correlated (r = 0.989–1.000; p < 0.001), forming a common disease burden dimension. PIR was moderately and inversely correlated (r = −0.54 to −0.65; p < 0.001), representing survival and chronic care. PCA identified two components explaining 99.96% of variance: PC1 (86.13%), defined by YLR, DPR, and MIR, indicating overall care performance, and PC2 (13.83%), defined by PIR, reflecting long-term management quality.

    • Analysis of EAPC in relation to the HDI revealed no significant linear correlations for ASIR, ASMR, or ASDR (all p > 0.05). EAPC in ASIR showed a weak negative correlation (r = –0.25, p = 0.16), suggesting slower incidence growth in higher-HDI countries. ASMR exhibited minimal association (r = –0.07, p = 0.71), while ASDR displayed a slight U-shaped pattern (r = 0.14, p = 0.43), with sharper declines in moderate-HDI regions and mild rebounds in high-HDI areas. These findings underscore heterogeneous, non-linear relationships between socioeconomic development and the evolving childhood diabetes burden (Supplementary Fig. S8).

    • SHAP analysis was used as a supportive tool to summarize the relative contribution of basic demographic and temporal variables, rather than to identify causal determinants. The XGBoost SHAP model showed distinct regional patterns in predictor contribution. In Western Sub-Saharan Africa, age contributed most strongly to predicted incidence and DALY rates (Fig. 5a). Older children aged 10–14 years had higher predicted incidence and disability burdens, and calendar year showed a gradual temporal contribution. These patterns may be consistent with delayed diagnosis, improved ascertainment, or changing access to care, but they should not be interpreted as direct causal evidence. In High-Income North America, age and year contributed most strongly to predicted incidence and DALY rates, whereas sex and population size contributed less (Fig. 5b). Overall, age and temporal variables were consistent contributors to model predictions across regions.

      Figure 5. 

      SHAP-based interpretation of childhood diabetes incidence and DALY Rates in Western Sub-Saharan Africa and High-Income North America. (a) Western Sub-Saharan Africa. (b) High-income North America.

    • Forecast analyses of high- and representative-incidence countries revealed divergent trends. The United States is projected to peak in 2030 with an ASIR of 37.97 per 100,000, followed by a gradual decline to 35.89 by 2045. In contrast, China, India, Poland, Finland, and Qatar are expected to continue rising, reaching 5.31, 4.42, 42.50, 55.55, and 106.56 per 100,000, respectively, indicating widening epidemiologic disparities (Supplementary Fig. S9).

    • This GBD 2023-based analysis focused on regional inequalities in childhood diabetes burden from 1990 to 2023 and their potential persistence into the future. We identified a persistent dual inequality pattern: childhood diabetes incidence increased in most regions, whereas mortality and DALYs declined overall. However, these changes were uneven across regions. High-Income North America had the highest incidence in 2023, consistent with broader registry coverage and improved case ascertainment, whereas Western Sub-Saharan Africa continued to bear the greatest mortality and disability burden. These findings suggest that high-detection settings face an expanding diagnosed burden, while resource-limited settings continue to experience higher mortality and disability.

      These results extend earlier GBD estimates by clarifying shifting geographic and socioeconomic patterns in childhood diabetes burden. South Asia’s relative contribution to incidence appeared lower in the GBD 2023 estimates, whereas Central and Eastern Europe, the Middle East, and several Asian economies showed increasing incidence trends. Finland continued to report the highest incidence, while Qatar, Chile, and South Korea showed rapid increases. These patterns may be related to urbanization, lifestyle transition, environmental exposure, improved diagnostic capacity, and differences in registry coverage[2325]. Persistently high mortality in Nigeria and Niger may reflect weaker health-system capacity, limited access to pediatric diabetes care, and socioeconomic constraints. Socioeconomic development showed a dual association with disease burden: SDI was positively correlated with incidence but negatively correlated with mortality and DALYs. This pattern suggests that higher-SDI regions may achieve broader diagnosis and better survival, whereas lower-SDI regions may experience greater diagnostic and treatment gaps. Emerging and transitional economies such as China, India, and Poland showed increasing incidence trends, which may reflect a combination of improved ascertainment, demographic change, lifestyle transition, and evolving metabolic risk profiles.

      The rise in incidence may reflect the convergence of environmental, lifestyle, and health-system factors. The 2021–2023 period should be interpreted cautiously because post-pandemic changes may reflect several overlapping processes. Part of the observed increase may reflect catch-up diagnosis after delays in presentation, disrupted routine care, and reduced healthcare utilization during the early pandemic period. COVID-19-related viral infection, lifestyle disruption, and psychosocial stress have also been proposed as potential contributors to childhood diabetes onset[26]. At the same time, recovery of health services, heightened health awareness, and expanded use of telemedicine may have improved case ascertainment after 2021[5,11,2732]. The steady decline in mortality and DALYs may be consistent with progress in diabetes care, including wider insulin availability, improved management of diabetic ketoacidosis, and expanded glucose monitoring[3335]. However, persistently high mortality in Sub-Saharan Africa and Central Asia suggests that these gains remain uneven. Limited insulin access, inadequate clinician training, and weak healthcare infrastructure may continue to constrain progress. Sustainable improvement will require resilient pediatric diabetes systems that ensure accessibility, affordability, and continuity of care.

      The QCI analysis provides additional context by translating mortality, disability, and incidence-related indicators into a care-related inequality framework. Rather than serving as a separate conclusion, QCI supports the main finding by assessing whether regions with higher mortality and disability also show weaker care-related performance. High-Income North America showed higher QCI values, consistent with stronger diagnosis, survival, and long-term management, whereas Western Sub-Saharan Africa showed lower and more variable scores. These findings suggest that survival gains may depend not only on disease occurrence but also on early recognition, reliable insulin access, acute complication management, and continuity of pediatric diabetes care[3638].

      The SHAP analysis was included to support the interpretation of broad demographic and temporal patterns. Its added value lies in summarizing how basic demographic and temporal variables contributed to model predictions beyond descriptive trend analyses. Age and calendar year contributed more strongly than sex or population size in the selected regional models, suggesting that age structure and temporal changes were closely aligned with predicted incidence and DALY patterns. However, because the model included only year, age, sex, and population size, SHAP findings should be interpreted as summaries of predictor contribution rather than evidence of biological mechanisms or causal determinants.

      Forecast analyses suggest divergent future trajectories. The United States may reach a plateau by 2030, possibly reflecting stabilization of recent incidence trends and relatively mature diagnostic systems. In contrast, China, India, Poland, Finland, and Qatar are projected to continue rising through 2045, suggesting that future incidence inequalities may remain geographically heterogeneous. These projections should be interpreted as extensions of historical trends rather than definitive predictions, because future changes in surveillance, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment access may alter these trajectories. Priorities include early diagnosis, reliable insulin access, diabetes education, and strengthened pediatric diabetes services.

      Despite the strengths of the GBD framework, this study remains constrained by the inherent limitations of modeled estimates. Variations in case definitions, registry completeness, coding practices, and data quality may affect cross-country comparisons, especially in low-income and data-sparse settings where estimates rely more heavily on statistical modeling and often have wider 95% UIs. Therefore, precise differences in magnitude and regional rank order should be interpreted cautiously, and underdiagnosis in resource-limited settings may lead to underestimation of incidence. In addition, risk attribution, QCI, SHAP, and forecasting analyses were supportive, population-level analyses and should not be interpreted as evidence of individual-level causality or biological mechanisms. BAPC projections were based on historical trends and may not capture future changes in prevention, diagnosis, treatment access, or health policy. Future work incorporating high-quality registry data, longitudinal cohorts, and health-system indicators will be important to refine estimates and better characterize regional inequalities.

    • Childhood diabetes incidence continues to rise despite overall declines in mortality and disability. The GBD 2023 analysis revealed persistent regional and socioeconomic disparities, with High-Income North America showing the highest incidence and Western Sub-Saharan Africa bearing the greatest mortality and disability burden. Supportive analyses suggested that these inequalities were accompanied by care-related performance gaps and divergent future incidence trajectories. Strengthening early detection, reliable insulin access, acute complication management, and continuity of pediatric diabetes care is essential to reduce preventable mortality and disability in resource-limited settings.

      • The authors thank the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023 collaborators for providing the publicly available data used in this study. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection, data management, data analysis, data interpretation, manuscript preparation, manuscript review or approval, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

      • This study used publicly available, de-identified, and aggregated data from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023. No individual-level human participant data were involved. Therefore, ethical approval and informed consent were not required.

      • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Zhang K, Kan C, Xue Y, Sun X; data collection: Zhang K, Kan C, Han F, Li X, Zheng T, Hou N, Sheng S, Xu W; analysis and interpretation of results: Zhang K, Kan C, Han F, Li X, Zheng T, Hou N, Sheng S, Xu W, Xue Y, Sun X; draft manuscript preparation: Zhang K, Kan C; critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Xue Y, Sun X; statistical analysis: Zhang K, Kan C, Han F, Xu W; funding acquisition: Xue Y, Sun X; administrative, technical, or material support: Hou N, Sheng S, Xue Y, Sun X; supervision: Hou N, Xue Y, Sun X. Zhang K and Kan C contributed equally to this work and are considered co-first authors. Xue Y and Sun X had full access to the data used in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • The data that support the findings of this study are available in the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023 (GBD 2023) repository. These data were derived from publicly available resources provided by the Global Health Data Exchange: https://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-2023.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • # Authors contributed equally: Kexin Zhang, Chengxia Kan

      • Copyright © 2026 by the author(s). Pediatric Diabetes published by Maximum Academic Press on behalf of John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
    Figure (5)  References (38)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Zhang K, Kan C, Han F, Li X, Zheng T, et al. 2026. Diverging regional inequalities in childhood diabetes, 1990–2023: a GBD 2023-based analysis. Pediatric Diabetes 2026: e001 doi: 10.48130/pedi-0026-0002
    Zhang K, Kan C, Han F, Li X, Zheng T, et al. 2026. Diverging regional inequalities in childhood diabetes, 1990–2023: a GBD 2023-based analysis. Pediatric Diabetes 2026: e001 doi: 10.48130/pedi-0026-0002

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return