|
Aleven K. D., 2003Using background knowledge in case-based legal reasoning: a computational model and an intelligent learning environment. Artificial Intelligence150, 183–237.
Google Scholar
|
|
Anderson Terence and William L Twining, 1998Analysis of Evidence: How to Do Things with Facts Based on Wigmore’s ‘Science of Judicial Proof’. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Google Scholar
|
|
Beardsley Monroe C, 1950Practical Logic. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Google Scholar
|
|
Carbogim Daniela, Robertson David and Lee John, 2000Argument-based applications to knowledge engineering. Knowledge Engineering Review15(2), 119–149.
Google Scholar
|
|
Carenini Giuseppe and Moore Johanna, 2001 An empirical study of the influence of user tailoring on evaluative argument effectiveness. In Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2001) San Francisco, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 1307–1314. www.cs.ubc.ca/%7Ecarenini/PAPERS/ijcai01-cr.pdf.
Google Scholar
|
|
Chesñevar Carlos, Maguitman Gabriela and Loui Ron, 2000Logical models of argument. ACM Computing Surveys32(4), 337–383.
Google Scholar
|
|
Conklin Jeff, 2003 Dialog mapping: reflections on an industrial strength case study. In Kirschner et al., 2003, pp. 117–136.
Google Scholar
|
|
Crosswhite Jim, Fox John, Reed Chris, Scaltsas Theodore and Stumpf Simone, 2003 Computational models of rhetorical argument. In Reed Chris and Norman Timothy (eds.), Argumentation Machines. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 175–210.
Google Scholar
|
|
Dung P, 1995On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence77, 321–357.
Google Scholar
|
|
Finocchiaro Maurice, 1980Galileo and the Art of Reasoning. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Google Scholar
|
|
Freeman James B, 1991Dialectics and the Macrostructure of Arguments. Foris: Berlin.
Google Scholar
|
|
Gordon Thomas F and Karacapilidis N, 1997 The zeno argumentation framework. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on AI and Law, New York: ACM Press, pp. 10–18.
Google Scholar
|
|
Gordon Thomas F, Karacapilidis N, Voss H and Zauke A, 1997a Computer-mediated spatial planning. In Timmermans H (ed.) Decision Support Systems in Urban Planning, h.p.: E. and F. N. Spon. London, 299–309.
Google Scholar
|
|
Grasso Floriana, Cawsey Alison and Jones Ray, 2000Dialectical argumentation to solve conflicts in advice giving: a case study in the promotion of healthy nutrition. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies53(6), 1077–1115.
Google Scholar
|
|
Grennan Wayne, 1997Informal Logic.Buffalo: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Google Scholar
|
|
Harrell, Maralee, Using argument diagramming software in the classroom Teaching Philosophy, 28(2), 2005, www.hss.cmu.edu/philosophy/harrell/ArgumentDiagramsInClassroom.pdf.
Google Scholar
|
|
Hirsch L, Saeedi M, Cornillon J and Litosseliti L, 2004A structured dialogue tool for argumentative learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning20, 72–80.
Google Scholar
|
|
Horn Robert E, 2003 Infrastructure for navigating interdisciplinary debates: critical decisions for representing argumentation. In Kirschner et al., 2003, pp. 165–184.
Google Scholar
|
|
Hurley Patrick, 2003A Concise Introduction to Logic, 8th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth.
Google Scholar
|
|
Kirschner Paul A, Buckingham Shum Simon J and Carr Chad S (eds.), 2003Visualizing Argumentation. London: Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Krause P, Ambler S, Elvang-Goransson M and Fox J, 1995A logic of argumentation for reasoning under uncertainty. Computational Intelligence11, 113–131.
Google Scholar
|
|
Palmer Andrew, 2003Proof and the Preparation of Trials. Sydney, Australia: Lawbook Co.
Google Scholar
|
|
Paolucci Massimo, Suthers Dan and Weiner Arlene, 1995 Belvedere: stimulating students' critical discussion. In Proceedings CHI'95: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, ACM Press, pp. 123–124.
Google Scholar
|
|
Parsons Simon and Jennings Nicholas, 1996 Negotiation through argumentation: a preliminary report. In Proceedings of ICMAS 96, pp. 267–274. eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/2149/01/ICMAS96.pdf.
Google Scholar
|
|
Pearl Judea, 1984Heuristics: Intelligent Search Strategies for Computer Problem Solving, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley.
Google Scholar
|
|
Pollock John, 1995Cognitive Carpentry. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Google Scholar
|
|
Pollock John, 2002Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification II, greatly revised and expanded version of Defeasible reasoning with variable degrees of justification. Artificial Intelligence133, 233–282. Available from oscarhome.soc-sci.arizona.edu/ftp/PAPERS/Degrees.pdf
Google Scholar
|
|
Reed Chris and Norman Timothy J (eds.), 2003Argumentation Machines. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Reed Chris and Rowe Glenn, 2004Araucaria: software for argument analysis, diagramming and representation. International Journal of AI Tools14(3–4), 961–980.
Google Scholar
|
|
Rolf Bertil and Magnusson C, 2003 Developing the art of argumentation: a software approach In Proceedings of the 5th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argument (ISSA) Sicsat, 919–925.
Google Scholar
|
|
Schum David, 1994Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning. Toronto: John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar
|
|
Scriven Michael, 1976Reasoning, Point Reyes: Edgepress.
Google Scholar
|
|
Selvin Albert M, 2003 Fostering collective intelligence: helping groups use visualized argumentation. In Kirschner et al., 2003, pp. 137–163.
Google Scholar
|
|
Tillers Peter, 2003Probability and Uncertainty in Law. International Summer School Lectures, Konstanz. Available from tillers.net/uncertainlaw/uncertain.html
Google Scholar
|
|
Tillers Peter, 2004Picturing Inference, An Essay in Honor of Professor Lothar Philipps. Available from tillers.net/pictures/picturing.html
Google Scholar
|
|
Toulmin Stephen, 1958The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
|
|
Toulmin Stephen, Richard Riecke and Allan Janik, 1984An Introduction to Reasoning. New York: Macmillan.
Google Scholar
|
|
Van Gelder Tim, 2001The reason! project. The Skeptic21(2), 9–12.
Google Scholar
|
|
Van Gelder Tim and Rizzo Alberto, 2001 Reason!able across the curriculum. In 2001: Is IT an Odyssey in Learning? Proceedings of the 2001 Conference of ICT in Education Victoria. www.philosophy.unimelb.edu.au/tgelder/Reason/papers/CEGV2001.pdf.
Google Scholar
|
|
Verheij Bart, 2005Virtual Arguments: On the Design of Argument Assistants for Lawyers and Other Arguers. The Hague: T.M.C.Asser Press.
Google Scholar
|
|
Walton Douglas, 1996Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. New York: Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
|
|
Walton Douglas, Henry Prakken and Chris Reed, 2003 Argumentation schemes and generalisations in reasoning about evidence. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Edinburgh, 2003. New York: ACM Press, pp. 32–41.
Google Scholar
|
|
Whately Richard, 1836Elements of Logic. 6th ed. London: B. Fellowes.
Google Scholar
|
|
Wigmore John Henry, 1913The Principles of Judicial Proof. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. 2nd ed. 1931.
Google Scholar
|
|
Wright Sewall, 1921Correlation and causation. Journal of Agricultural Research20, 557–585.
Google Scholar
|
