[1]

Goldsborough SS, Hochgreb S, Vanhove G, Wooldridge MS, Curran HJ, et al. 2017. Advances in rapid compression machine studies of low- and intermediate-temperature autoignition phenomena. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 63:1−78

doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2017.05.002
[2]

Tran LS, Herbinet O, Carstensen HH, Battin-Leclerc F. 2022. Chemical kinetics of cyclic ethers in combustion. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 92:101019

doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2022.101019
[3]

Petersen EL, Hanson RK. 2001. Nonideal effects behind reflected shock waves in a high-pressure shock tube. Shock Waves 10:405−420

doi: 10.1007/PL00004051
[4]

Nativel D, Cooper SP, Lipkowicz T, Fikri M, Petersen EL, et al. 2020. Impact of shock-tube facility-dependent effects on incident- and reflected-shock conditions over a wide range of pressures and Mach numbers. Combustion and Flame 217:200−211

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.03.023
[5]

Davidson DF, Hanson RK. 2004. Interpreting shock tube ignition data. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics 36:510−523

doi: 10.1002/kin.20024
[6]

Hong Z, Pang GA, Vasu SS, Davidson DF, Hanson RK. 2009. The use of driver inserts to reduce non-ideal pressure variations behind reflected shock waves. Shock Waves 19:113−123

doi: 10.1007/s00193-009-0205-y
[7]

Campbell MF, Parise T, Tulgestke AM, Spearrin RM, Davidson DF, et al. 2015. Strategies for obtaining long constant-pressure test times in shock tubes. Shock Waves 25:651−665

doi: 10.1007/s00193-015-0596-x
[8]

Li H, Owens ZC, Davidson DF, Hanson RK. 2008. A simple reactive gasdynamic model for the computation of gas temperature and species concentrations behind reflected shock waves. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics 40:189−198

doi: 10.1002/kin.20305
[9]

Chaos M, Dryer FL. 2010. Chemical-kinetic modeling of ignition delay: Considerations in interpreting shock tube data. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics 42:143−150

doi: 10.1002/kin.20471
[10]

Liu M, Wang M, Sung CJ, Aljohani K, Farooq A, et al. 2024. A comprehensive experimental and kinetic modeling study of p-cymene oxidation. Combustion and Flame 262:113337

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2024.113337
[11]

Liu M, Fang R, Sung CJ, Aljohani K, Farooq A, et al. 2022. A comprehensive experimental and modeling study of n-propylcyclohexane oxidation. Combustion and Flame 238:111944

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111944
[12]

Zhang C, Li B, Rao F, Li P, Li X. 2015. A shock tube study of the autoignition characteristics of RP-3 jet fuel. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 35:3151−3158

doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2014.05.017
[13]

Ninnemann E, Koroglu B, Pryor O, Barak S, Nash L, et al. 2018. New insights into the shock tube ignition of H2/O2 at low to moderate temperatures using high-speed end-wall imaging. Combustion and Flame 187:11−21

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.08.021
[14]

Do HQ, Lefort B, Serinyel Z, LeMoyne L, Dayma G. 2024. Comparative study of the high-temperature auto-ignition of cyclopentane and tetrahydrofuran. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics 56:199−209

doi: 10.1002/kin.21703
[15]

Goldsborough SS, Jespersen MC, Santner JS, Sivaramakrishnan R, Do HQ, et al. 2025. Experimental and modeling study of the autoignition behavior of a saturated heterocycle: Pyrrolidine. Combustion and Flame 277:114134

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2025.114134
[16]

Dayma G, Serinyel Z, Carbonnier M, Bai J, Zhu Y, et al. 2021. Oxidation of pentan-2-ol – part II: Experimental and modeling study. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 38:833−841

doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2020.07.062
[17]

El Merhubi H, Kéromnès A, Catalano G, Lefort B, Le Moyne L. 2016. A high pressure experimental and numerical study of methane ignition. Fuel 177:164−172

doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.03.016
[18]

Gaseq. A chemical equilibrium program for windows. Available from: www.gaseq.co.uk/
[19]

Peng DY, Robinson DB. 1976. A new two-constant equation of state. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals 15:59−64

doi: 10.1021/i160057a011
[20]

Alturaifi SA, Mathieu O, Petersen EL. 2022. An experimental and modeling study of ammonia pyrolysis. Combustion and Flame 235:111694

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111694
[21]

Wang QD, Jia MX, Yao D, Feng Y, Zhang J, et al. 2024. Ab initio chemical kinetics and shock-tube experimental study on nitrocyclohexane pyrolysis and combustion. Combustion and Flame 269:113693

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2024.113693
[22]

Heufer KA, Büttgen RD, Pratali Maffei L, Pelucchi M. 2024. Auto-ignition characteristics of oxygenated aromatic compounds: Benzyl alcohol, benzaldehyde, and phenol. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 40:105252

doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2024.105252
[23]

Hargis JW, Petersen EL. 2017. Shock-Tube boundary-layer effects on reflected-shock conditions with and without CO2. AIAA Journal 55:902−912

doi: 10.2514/1.J055253
[24]

Gerasimov IE, Knyazkov DA, Bolshova TA, Shmakov AG, Korobeinichev OP, et al. 2020. Methyl-3-hexenoate combustion chemistry: experimental study and numerical kinetic simulation. Combustion and Flame 222:170−180

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.08.028