doi:10.48130/ph-0026-0002

[1]

Munné-Bosch S. 2025. Phytohormones revisited: what makes a compound a hormone in plants. Trends in Plant Science

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2025.08.020

[2]

Tóth R, Van Der Hoorn RAL. 2010. Emerging principles in plant chemical genetics. Trends in Plant Science 15(2):81−88

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.005

[3]

Tuncel A, Pan C, Clem JS, Liu D, Qi Y. 2025. CRISPR–Cas applications in agriculture and plant research. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 26(6):419−441

doi: 10.1038/s41580-025-00834-3

[4]

He, W, Brumos J, Li H, Ji Y, Ke M, et al. 2011. A small-molecule screen identifies L-kynurenine as a competitive inhibitor of TAA1/TAR activity in ethylene-directed auxin biosynthesis and root growth in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 23(11):3944−3960

doi: 10.1105/tpc.111.089029

[5]

Meesters C, Mönig T, Oeljeklaus J, Krahn D, Westfall CS, et al. 2014. A chemical inhibitor of jasmonate signaling targets JAR1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature Chemical Biology 10(10):830−836

doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1591

[6]

Xie Y, Zhu Y, Wang N, Luo M, Ota T, et al. 2022. Chemical genetic screening identifies nalacin as an inhibitor of GH3 amido synthetase for auxin conjugation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119(49):e2209256119

doi: 10.1073/pnas.2209256119

[7]

Wang J, Yang Z, Duan H, Duan L, Tan W. 2020. Computational-aided discovery of novel 1,3-benzodioxole plant growth retardants. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 39(2):888−896

doi: 10.1007/s00344-019-10030-1

[8]

Li S, Li Y, Chen L, Zhang C, Wang F, et al. 2021. Strigolactone mimic 2-nitrodebranone is highly active in Arabidopsis growth and development. The Plant Journal 107(1):67−76

doi: 10.1111/tpj.15274

[9]

Berenguer E, Carneros E, Pérez-Pérez Y, Gil C, Martínez A, et al. 2021. Small molecule inhibitors of mammalian GSK-3β promote in vitro plant cell reprogramming and somatic embryogenesis in crop and forest species. Journal of Experimental Botany 72(22):7808−7825

doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab365

[10]

Sisler EC, & Serek M. 1997. Inhibitors of ethylene responses in plants at the receptor level: recent developments. Physiologia Plantarum 100(3):577−582

doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.1997.tb03063.x

[11]

Lozano-Juste J, Infantes L, Garcia-Maquilon I, Ruiz-Partida R, Merilo E, et al. 2023. Structure-guided engineering of a receptor-agonist pair for inducible activation of the ABA adaptive response to drought. Science Advances 9(10):eade9948

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade9948

[12]

Zenchenko AA, Savelieva EM, Semenova JD, Drenichev MS, Solyev PN et al. 2025. Distinct N⁶-substituted adenosine derivatives exhibit receptor-specific anticytokinin action by unknown non-competitive mechanism. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 4:4658−4677

doi: 10.1007/s00344-025-11714-7

[13]

Vain T, Raggi S, Ferro N, Barange DK, Kieffer M, et al. 2019. Selective auxin agonists induce specific AUX/IAA protein degradation to modulate plant development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 116(13):6463−6472

doi: 10.1073/pnas.1809037116

[14]

Park SY, Fung P, Nishimura N, Jensen DR, Fujii H, et al. 2009. Abscisic acid inhibits type 2C protein phosphatases via the PYR/PYL family of START proteins. Science 324:1068−1071

doi: 10.1126/science.1173041

[15]

Engelberth J, Koch T, Schüler G, Bachmann N, Rechtenbach J, et al. 2001. Ion channel-forming alamethicin is a potent elicitor of volatile biosynthesis and tendril coiling. Cross talk between jasmonate and salicylate signaling in lima bean. Plant Physiology 125(1):369−377

doi: 10.1104/pp.125.1.369

[16]

Jewell JB, Browse J. 2016. Epidermal jasmonate perception is sufficient for all aspects of jasmonate-mediated male fertility in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 85(5):634−647

doi: 10.1111/tpj.13131

[17]

Le Deunff E, Lecourt J. 2016. Non-specificity of ethylene inhibitors: 'double-edged' tools to find out new targets involved in the root morphogenetic programme. Plant Biology 18(3):353−361

doi: 10.1111/plb.12405

[18]

Hedden P, Graebe JE. 1985. Inhibition of gibberellin biosynthesis by paclobutrazol in cell-free homogenates of Cucurbita maxima endosperm and Malus pumila embryos. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 4:111−122

doi: 10.1007/BF02266949

[19]

Rademacher W. 2000. GROWTH RETARDANTS: effects on gibberellin biosynthesis and other metabolic pathways. Annual Review of Plant Biology 51:501−531

doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.51.1.501

[20]

Saito S, Okamoto M, Shinoda S, Kushiro T, Koshiba T, et al. 2006. A plant growth retardant, uniconazole, is a potent inhibitor of ABA catabolism in Arabidopsis. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 70(7):1731−1739

doi: 10.1271/bbb.60077

[21]

Dejonghe W, Russinova E. 2017. Plant chemical genetics: from phenotype-based screens to synthetic biology. Plant Physiology 174(1):5−20

doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01805

[22]

Sun X, Li Y, He W, Ji C, Xia P, et al. 2017. Pyrazinamide and derivatives block ethylene biosynthesis by inhibiting ACC oxidase. Nature Communications 8(1):15758

doi: 10.1038/ncomms15758

[23]

Fukui K, Arai K, Tanaka Y, Aoi Y, Kukshal V, Jez JM, et al. 2022. Chemical inhibition of the auxin inactivation pathway uncovers the roles of metabolic turnover in auxin homeostasis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119(32):e2206869119

doi: 10.1073/pnas.2206869119

[24]

Savelieva EM, Zenchenko AA, Drenichev MS, Kozlova AA, Kurochkin NN, et al. 2022. In planta, in vitro and in silico studies of chiral N⁶-benzyladenine derivatives: discovery of receptor-specific s-enantiomers with cytokinin or anticytokinin activities. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23(19):11334

doi: 10.3390/ijms231911334

[25]

Lomenick B, Hao R, Jonai N, Chin RM, Aghajan M, et al. 2009. Target identification using drug affinity responsive target stability (DARTS). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106(51):21984−21989

doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910040106

[26]

Volkening JD, Stecker KE, Sussman MR. 2019. Proteome-wide analysis of protein thermal stability in the model higher plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular & Cellular Proteomics 18(2):308−319

doi: 10.1074/mcp.RA118.001124

[27]

Vaidya AS, Peterson FC, Eckhardt J, Xing Z, Park SY, et al. 2021. Click-to-lead design of a picomolar ABA receptor antagonist with potent activity in vivo. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118(38):e2108281118

doi: 10.1073/pnas.2108281118

[28]

Eckhardt J, Vaidya A, Cutler S. 2024. Chemical disruption of ABA signaling overcomes high-temperature inhibition of seed germination and enhances seed priming responses. PLoS One 19(12):e0315290

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315290

[29]

Jiang K, Asami T. 2018. Chemical regulators of plant hormones and their applications in basic research and agriculture. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 82(8):1265−1300

doi: 10.1080/09168451.2018.1462693

[30]

Vanneste S, Pei Y, Friml J. 2025. Mechanisms of auxin action in plant growth and development. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 26(9):648−666

doi: 10.1038/s41580-025-00851-2

[31]

Narukawa-Nara M, Nakamura A, Kikuzato K, Kakei Y, Sato A, et al. 2016. Aminooxy-naphthylpropionic acid and its derivatives are inhibitors of auxin biosynthesis targeting L-tryptophan aminotransferase: structure–activity relationships. The Plant Journal 87(3):245−257

doi: 10.1111/tpj.13197

[32]

Kakei Y, Nakamura A, Yamamoto M, Ishida Y, Yamazaki C, et al. 2017. Biochemical and chemical biology study of rice OsTAR1 revealed that tryptophan aminotransferase is involved in auxin biosynthesis; identification of a potent OsTAR1 inhibitor, pyruvamine2031. Plant and Cell Physiology 58(3):598−606

doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcx007

[33]

Nishimura T, Hayashi KI, Suzuki H, Gyohda A, Takaoka C, et al. 2014. Yucasin is a potent inhibitor of YUCCA, a key enzyme in auxin biosynthesis. The Plant Journal 77(3):352−366

doi: 10.1111/tpj.12399

[34]

Kakei Y, Yamazaki C, Suzuki M, Nakamura A, Sato A, et al. 2015. Small-molecule auxin inhibitors that target YUCCA are powerful tools for studying auxin function. The Plant Journal 84(4):827−837

doi: 10.1111/tpj.13032

[35]

Imhoff V, Muller P, Guern J, Delbarre A. 2000. Inhibitors of the carrier-mediated influx of auxin in suspension-cultured tobacco cells. Planta 210(4):580−588

doi: 10.1007/s004250050047

[36]

Dhonukshe P, Grigoriev I, Fischer R, Tominaga M, Robinson DG, et al. 2008. Auxin transport inhibitors impair vesicle motility and actin cytoskeleton dynamics in diverse eukaryotes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105(11):4489−4494

doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711414105

[37]

Lanková M, Smith RS, Pesek B, Kubes M, Zazímalová E, et al. 2010. Auxin influx inhibitors 1-NOA, 2-NOA, and CHPAA interfere with membrane dynamics in tobacco cells. Journal of Experimental Botany 61(13):3589−3598

doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq172

[38]

Hayashi K, Neve J, Hirose M, Kuboki A, Shimada Y, et al. 2012. Rational design of an auxin antagonist of the SCFTIR1 auxin receptor complex. ACS Chemical Biology 7(3):590−598

doi: 10.1021/cb200404c

[39]

van der Woude L, Piotrowski M, Klaasse G, Paulus JK, Krahn D, et al. 2021. The chemical compound 'Heatin' stimulates hypocotyl elongation and interferes with the Arabidopsis NIT1-subfamily of nitrilases. The Plant Journal 106(6):1523−1540

doi: 10.1111/tpj.15250

[40]

Staswick PE, Serban B, Rowe M, Tiryaki I, Maldonado MT, et al. 2005. Characterization of an Arabidopsis enzyme family that conjugates amino acids to indole-3-acetic acid. The Plant Cell 17(2):616−627

doi: 10.1105/tpc.104.026690

[41]

Böttcher C, Dennis EG, Booker GW, Polyak SW, Boss PK, et al. 2012. A novel tool for studying auxin-metabolism: the inhibition of grapevine indole-3-acetic acid-amido synthetases by a reaction intermediate analogue. PLoS One 7(5):e37632

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0037632

[42]

Ke D, Xie Y, Li H, Hu L, He Y, et al. 2024. Anchorene, a carotenoid-derived growth regulator, modulates auxin homeostasis by suppressing GH3-mediated auxin conjugation. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 66(11):2490−2504

doi: 10.1111/jipb.13764

[43]

Ung KL, Winkler M, Schulz L, Kolb M, Janacek DP, et al. 2022. Structures and mechanism of the plant PIN-FORMED auxin transporter. Nature 609(7927):605−610

doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04883-y

[44]

Xia J, Kong M, Yang Z, Sun L, Peng Y, et al. 2023. Chemical inhibition of Arabidopsis PIN-FORMED auxin transporters by the anti-inflammatory drug naproxen. Plant Communications 4(6):100632

doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2023.100632

[45]

Tan S, Di Donato M, Glanc M, Zhang X, Klíma P, et al. 2020. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs target TWISTED DWARF1-regulated actin dynamics and auxin transport-mediated plant development. Cell Reports 33(9):108463

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108463

[46]

Quareshy M, Prusinska J, Kieffer M, Fukui K, Pardal AJ, et al. 2018. The tetrazole analogue of the auxin indole-3-acetic acid binds preferentially to TIR1 and not AFB5. ACS Chemical Biology 13(9):2585−2594

doi: 10.1021/acschembio.8b00527

[47]

Hedden P. 2020. The Current Status of Research on Gibberellin Biosynthesis. Plant and Cell Physiology 61(11):1832−1849

doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcaa092

[48]

Rademacher W. 1991. Inhibitors of gibberellin biosynthesis: applications in agriculture and horticulture. In Gibberellins, eds. Takahashi N, Phinney BO, MacMillan J. New York, US: Springer. pp. 296–310 10.1007/978-1-4612-3002-1_29

[49]

Shechter I, West CA. 1969. Biosynthesis of gibberellins. Journal of Biological Chemistry 244(12):3200−3209

doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)93114-5

[50]

Griggs DL, Hedden P, Temple-Smith KE, Rademacher W. 1991. Inhibition of gibberellin 2β-hydroxylases by acylcyclohexanedione derivatives. Phytochemistry 30(8):2513−2517

doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(91)85091-D

[51]

Rademacher W. 1992. Inhibition of gibberellin production in the fungi Gibberella fujikuroi and Sphaceloma manihoticola by plant growth retardants. Plant Physiology 100(2):625−629

doi: 10.1104/pp.100.2.625

[52]

Otani M, Yoon JM, Park SH, Asami T, Nakajima M. 2010. Screening and characterization of an inhibitory chemical specific to Arabidopsis gibberellin 2-oxidases. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 20(14):4259−4262

doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.05.015

[53]

Jiang K, Shimotakahara H, Luo M, Otani M, Nakamura H, et al. 2017. Chemical screening and development of novel gibberellin mimics. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 27(16):3678−3682

doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2017.07.012

[54]

Metzger JD. 1983. Promotion of germination of dormant weed seeds by substituted phthalimides and gibberellic acid. Weed Science 31(3):285−289

doi: 10.1017/S0043174500069010

[55]

Yoon JM, Nakajima M, Mashiguchi K, Park SH, Otani M, et al. 2013. Chemical screening of an inhibitor for gibberellin receptors based on a yeast two-hybrid system. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 23(4):1096−1098

doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2012.12.007

[56]

Kieber JJ, Schaller GE. 2014. Cytokinins. The Arabidopsis Book 12:e0168

doi: 10.1199/tab.0168

[57]

Argueso CT, Kieber JJ. 2024. Cytokinin: From autoclaved DNA to two-component signaling. The Plant Cell 36(5):1429−1450

doi: 10.1093/plcell/koad327

[58]

Sasaki E, Ogura T, Takei K, Kojima M, Kitahata N, et al. 2013. Uniconazole, a cytochrome P450 inhibitor, inhibits trans-zeatin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Phytochemistry 87:30−38

doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.11.023

[59]

Nisler J, Kopečný D, Končitíková R, Zatloukal M, Bazgier V, et al. 2016. Novel thidiazuron-derived inhibitors of cytokinin oxidase/dehydrogenase. Plant Molecular Biology 92(1-2):235−248

doi: 10.1007/s11103-016-0509-0

[60]

Aremu AO, Masondo NA, Sunmonu TO, Kulkarni MG, Zatloukal M, et al. 2014. A novel inhibitor of cytokinin degradation (INCYDE) influences the biochemical parameters and photosynthetic apparatus in NaCl-stressed tomato plants. Planta 240(4):877−889

doi: 10.1007/s00425-014-2126-y

[61]

Spíchal L, Werner T, Popa I, Riefler M, Schmülling T, et al. 2009. The purine derivative PI-55 blocks cytokinin action via receptor inhibition. The FEBS Journal 276(1):244−253

doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2008.06777.x

[62]

Nisler J, Zatloukal M, Popa I, Doležal K, Strnad M, et al. 2010. Cytokinin receptor antagonists derived from 6-benzylaminopurine. Phytochemistry 71(7):823−830

doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2010.01.018

[63]

Savelieva EM, Oslovsky VE, Karlov DS, Kurochkin NN, Getman IA, et al. 2018. Cytokinin activity of N⁶-benzyladenine derivatives assayed by interaction with the receptors in planta, in vitro, and in silico. Phytochemistry 149:161−177

doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2018.02.008

[64]

Arata Y, Nagasawa-Iida A, Uneme H, Nakajima H, Kakimoto T, et al. 2010. The phenylquinazoline compound S-4893 is a non-competitive cytokinin antagonist that targets Arabidopsis cytokinin receptor CRE1 and promotes root growth in Arabidopsis and rice. Plant and Cell Physiology 51(12):2047−2059

doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcq163

[65]

Dejonghe W, Okamoto M, Cutler SR. 2018. Small Molecule probes of ABA biosynthesis and signaling. Plant and Cell Physiology 59(8):1490−1499

doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcy126

[66]

Han SY, Kitahata N, Sekimata K, Saito T, Kobayashi M, et al. 2004. A novel inhibitor of 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase in abscisic acid biosynthesis in higher plants. Plant Physiology 135(3):1574−1582

doi: 10.1104/pp.104.039511

[67]

Awan SZ, Chandler JO, Harrison PJ, Sergeant MJ, Bugg TDH, et al. 2017. Promotion of Germination Using Hydroxamic Acid Inhibitors of 9-cis-Epoxycarotenoid Dioxygenase. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:357

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00357

[68]

Okazaki M, Kittikorn M, Ueno K, Mizutani M, Hirai N, et al. 2012. Abscinazole-E2B, a practical and selective inhibitor of ABA 8′-hydroxylase CYP707A. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 20(10):3162−3172

doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2012.03.068

[69]

Okamoto M, Peterson FC, Defries A, Park SY, Endo A, et al. 2013. Activation of dimeric ABA receptors elicits guard cell closure, ABA-regulated gene expression, and drought tolerance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(29):12132−12137

doi: 10.1073/pnas.1305919110

[70]

Vaidya AS, Helander JDM, Peterson FC, Elzinga D, Dejonghe W, et al. 2019. Dynamic control of plant water use using designed ABA receptor agonists. Science 366(6464):eaaw8848

doi: 10.1126/science.aaw8848

[71]

Takeuchi J, Okamoto M, Akiyama T, Muto T, Yajima S, et al. 2014. Designed abscisic acid analogs as antagonists of PYL-PP2C receptor interactions. Nature Chemical Biology 10(6):477−482

doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1524

[72]

Takeuchi J, Mimura N, Okamoto M, Yajima S, Sue M, et al. 2018. Structure-based chemical design of abscisic acid antagonists that block PYL–PP2C receptor interactions. ACS Chemical Biology 13(5):1313−1321

doi: 10.1021/acschembio.8b00105

[73]

Che C, Zeng Y, Xu Y, Lu H, Xu Y, et al. 2020. APAn, a class of ABA receptor agonism/antagonism switching probes. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 68(32):8524−8534

doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c02154

[74]

Yoshida K, Kondoh Y, Nakano T, Bolortuya B, Kawabata S, et al. 2021. New abscisic acid derivatives revealed adequate regulation of stomatal, transcriptional, and developmental responses to conquer drought. ACS Chemical Biology 16(8):1566−1575

doi: 10.1021/acschembio.1c00451

[75]

Matsuoka S, Sato K, Maruki-Imamura R, Noutoshi Y, Okabe T, et al. 2021. Identification of novel compounds that inhibit SnRK2 kinase activity by high-throughput screening. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 537:57−63

doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.12.046

[76]

Depaepe T, Van Der Straeten D. 2020. Tools of the ethylene trade: a chemical kit to influence ethylene responses in plants and its use in agriculture. Small Methods 4(8):1900267

doi: 10.1002/smtd.201900267

[77]

Lau OL, Yang SF. 1976. Inhibition of ethylene production by cobaltous ion. Plant Physiology 58:114−117

doi: 10.1104/pp.58.1.114

[78]

Amrhein N, Wenker D. 1979. Novel inhibitors of ethylene production in higher plants. Plant and Cell Physiology 20(8):1635−1642

doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a075966

[79]

Pirrung MC, Cao J, Chen J. 1998. Ethylene biosynthesis: processing of a substrate analog supports a radical mechanism for the ethylene-forming enzyme. Chemistry & Biology 5(1):49−57

doi: 10.1016/S1074-5521(98)90086-2

[80]

McDaniel BK, Binder BM. 2012. Ethylene receptor 1 (ETR1) is sufficient and has the predominant role in mediating inhibition of ethylene responses by silver in Arabidopsis thaliana. Journal of Biological Chemistry 287(31):26094−26103

doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.383034

[81]

Li X, Fang P, Li M, Xu P. 2023. Identification of methyl 1-aminocyclopropanecarboxylate as a novel ethylene agonist: a structural analogy approach. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant 59(1):61−73

doi: 10.1007/s11627-023-10339-3

[82]

Heslop-Harrison G, Nakabayashi K, Espinosa-Ruiz A, Robertson F, Baines R, et al. 2024. Functional mechanism study of the allelochemical myrigalone A identifies a group of ultrapotent inhibitors of ethylene biosynthesis in plants. Plant Communications 5(6):100846

doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2024.100846

[83]

Li M, Yu G, Cao C, Liu P. 2021. Metabolism, signaling, and transport of jasmonates. Plant Communications 2(5):100231

doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2021.100231

[84]

Staswick PE, Huang JF, Rhee Y. 1991. Nitrogen and methyl jasmonate induction of soybean vegetative storage protein genes. Plant Physiology 96(1):130−136

doi: 10.1104/pp.96.1.130

[85]

Zeng M, Krajinski F, Van Dam NM, Hause B. 2023. Jarin-1, an inhibitor of JA-Ile biosynthesis in Arabidopsis thaliana, acts differently in other plant species. Plant Signaling & Behavior 18(1):2273515

doi: 10.1080/15592324.2023.2273515

[86]

Feys B, Benedetti CE, Penfold CN, Turner JG. 1994. Arabidopsis mutants selected for resistance to the phytotoxin coronatine are male sterile, insensitive to methyl jasmonate, and resistant to a bacterial pathogen. The Plant Cell 6(5):751−759

doi: 10.2307/3869877

[87]

Takaoka Y, Iwahashi M, Chini A, Saito H, Ishimaru Y, et al. 2018. A rationally designed JAZ subtype-selective agonist of jasmonate perception. Nature Communications 9(1):3654

doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06135-y

[88]

Hayashi K, Kato N, Bashir K, Nomoto H, Nakayama M, et al. 2023. Subtype-selective agonists of plant hormone co-receptor COI1-JAZs identified from the stereoisomers of coronatine. Communications Biology 6(1):320

doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-04709-1

[89]

Chini A, Monte I, Fernández-Barbero G, Boter M, Hicks G, et al. 2021. A small molecule antagonizes jasmonic acid perception and auxin responses in vascular and nonvascular plants. Plant Physiology 187(3):1399−1413

doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab369

[90]

Lin S, Ye M, Li X, Xing Y, Liu M, et al. 2022. A novel inhibitor of the jasmonic acid signaling pathway represses herbivore resistance in tea plants. Horticulture Research 9:uhab038

doi: 10.1093/hr/uhab038

[91]

Monte I, Hamberg M, Chini A, Gimenez-Ibanez S, García-Casado G, et al. 2014. Rational design of a ligand-based antagonist of jasmonate perception. Nature Chemical Biology 10(8):671−676

doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1575

[92]

Dejonghe W, Mishev K, Russinova E. 2014. The brassinosteroid chemical toolbox. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 22:48−55

doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2014.09.002

[93]

Zebosi B, Vollbrecht E, Best NB. 2024. Brassinosteroid biosynthesis and signaling: conserved and diversified functions of core genes across multiple plant species. Plant Communications 5(9):100982

doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2024.100982

[94]

Iwasaki T, Shibaoka H. 1991. Brassinosteroids act as regulators of tracheary-element differentiation in isolated Zinnia mesophyll cells. Plant and Cell Physiology 32(7):1007−1014

doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a078163

[95]

Asami T, Min YK, Nagata N, Yamagishi K, Takatsuto S, et al. 2000. Characterization of brassinazole, a triazole-type brassinosteroid biosynthesis inhibitor. Plant Physiology 123(1):93−100

doi: 10.1104/pp.123.1.93

[96]

Oh K, Matsumoto T, Yamagami A, Ogawa A, Yamada K, et al. 2015. YCZ-18 is a new brassinosteroid biosynthesis inhibitor. PLoS One 10(3):e0120812

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120812

[97]

Duran MI, González C, Acosta A, Olea AF, Díaz K, et al. 2017. Synthesis of five known brassinosteroid analogs from hyodeoxycholic acid and their activities as plant-growth regulators. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18(3):516

doi: 10.3390/ijms18030516

[98]

Andersen DL, Back TG, Janzen L, Michalak K, Pharis RP, et al. 2001. Design, synthesis, and bioactivity of the first nonsteroidal mimetics of brassinolide. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 66(21):7129−7141

doi: 10.1021/jo015832+

[99]

Muto T, Todoroki Y. 2013. Brassinolide-2, 3-acetonide: A brassinolide-induced rice lamina joint inclination antagonist. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry 21(14):4413−4419

doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2013.04.048

[100]

Takimoto S, Sugiura A, Minami S, Tasaka T, Nakagawa Y, et al. 2016. In silico exploration for agonists/antagonists of brassinolide. Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 26(7):1709−1714

doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2016.02.054

[101]

De Rybel B, Audenaert D, Vert G, Rozhon W, Mayerhofer J, et al. 2009. Chemical inhibition of a subset of Arabidopsis thaliana GSK3-like kinases activates brassinosteroid signaling. Chemistry & Biology 16(6):594−604

doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2009.04.008

[102]

Díaz K, Espinoza L, Carvajal R, Conde-González M, Niebla V, et al. 2020. Biological activities and molecular docking of brassinosteroids 24-norcholane type analogs. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21(5):1832

doi: 10.3390/ijms21051832

[103]

Nomura T, Seto Y, Kyozuka J. 2024. Unveiling the complexity of strigolactones: exploring structural diversity, biosynthesis pathways, and signaling mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Botany 75(4):1134−1147

doi: 10.1093/jxb/erad412

[104]

Sergeant MJ, Li JJ, Fox C, Brookbank N, Rea D, et al. 2009. Selective inhibition of carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases . Journal of Biological Chemistry 284(8):5257−5264

doi: 10.1074/jbc.M805453200

[105]

Ito S, Kitahata N, Umehara M, Hanada A, Kato A, et al. 2010. A New lead chemical for strigolactone biosynthesis inhibitors. Plant and Cell Physiology 51(7):1143−1150

doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcq077

[106]

Kawada K, Takahashi I, Arai M, Sasaki Y, Asami T, et al. 2019. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Novel Triazole Derivatives as Strigolactone Biosynthesis Inhibitors. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 67(22):6143−6149

doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.9b01276

[107]

Ito S, Umehara M, Hanada A, Kitahata N, Hayase H, et al. 2011. Effects of triazole derivatives on strigolactone levels and growth retardation in rice. PLoS ONE 6(7):e21723

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021723

[108]

Ito S, Braguy J, Wang JY, Yoda A, Fiorilli V, et al. 2022. Canonical strigolactones are not the major determinant of tillering but important rhizospheric signals in rice. Science Advances 8(44):eadd1278

doi: 10.1126/sciadv.add1278

[109]

Du L, Yan J, Yu C, Wang C, Tan W, et al. 2024. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of novel 1H-1,2,4-triazole derivatives as strigolactone biosynthesis inhibitors. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 43(3):741−754

doi: 10.1007/s00344-023-11133-6

[110]

Uraguchi D, Kuwata K, Hijikata Y, Yamaguchi R, Imaizumi H, et al. 2018. A femtomolar-range suicide germination stimulant for the parasitic plant Striga hermonthica. Science 362(6420):1301−1305

doi: 10.1126/science.aau5445

[111]

Zhao LH, Zhou XE, Yi W, Wu Z, Liu Y, et al. 2015. Destabilization of strigolactone receptor DWARF14 by binding of ligand and E3-ligase signaling effector DWARF3. Cell Research 25(11):1219−1236

doi: 10.1038/cr.2015.122

[112]

Nakamura H, Hirabayashi K, Miyakawa T, Kikuzato K, Hu W, et al. 2019. Triazole ureas covalently bind to strigolactone receptor and antagonize strigolactone responses. Molecular Plant 12(1):44−58

doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2018.10.006

[113]

Mashita O, Koishihara H, Fukui K, Nakamura H, Asami T. 2016. Discovery and identification of 2-methoxy-1-naphthaldehyde as a novel strigolactone-signaling inhibitor. Journal of Pesticide Science 41(3):71−78

doi: 10.1584/jpestics.D16-028

[114]

Johnson AW, Rosebery G, Parker C. 1976. A novel approach to Striga and Orobanche control using synthetic germination stimulants. Weed Research 16(4):223−227

doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1976.tb00406.x

[115]

Wang D, Pang Z, Yu H, Thiombiano B, Walmsley A, et al. 2022. Probing strigolactone perception mechanisms with rationally designed small-molecule agonists stimulating germination of root parasitic weeds. Nature Communications 13(1):3987

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31710-9

[116]

Takeuchi J, Jiang K, Hirabayashi K, Imamura Y, Wu Y, et al. 2018. Rationally designed strigolactone analogs as antagonists of the D14 receptor. Plant and Cell Physiology 59(8):1545−1554

doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcy087

[117]

Holbrook-Smith D, Toh S, Tsuchiya Y, McCourt P. 2016. Small-molecule antagonists of germination of the parasitic plant Striga hermonthica. Nature Chemical Biology 12(9):724−729

doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2129

[118]

Zarban RA, Hameed UFS, Jamil M, Ota T, Wang JY, et al. 2022. Rational design of Striga hermonthica-specific seed germination inhibitors. Plant Physiology 188(2):1369−1384

doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab547

[119]

Peng Y, Yang J, Li X, Zhang Y. 2021. Salicylic acid: biosynthesis and signaling. Annual Review of Plant Biology 72:761−791

doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-081320-092855

[120]

Amrhein N, Gödeke KH. 1977. α-aminooxy-β-phenylpropionic acid — a potent inhibitor of L-phenylalanine ammonia-lyase in vitro and in vivo. Plant Science Letters 8(4):313−317

doi: 10.1016/0304-4211(77)90148-1

[121]

Appert C, Zoń J, Amrhein N. 2003. Kinetic analysis of the inhibition of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase by 2-aminoindan-2-phosphonic acid and other phenylalanine analogues. Phytochemistry 62(3):415−422

doi: 10.1016/S0031-9422(02)00561-7

[122]

Joglekar S, Suliman M, Bartsch M, Halder V, Maintz J, et al. 2018. Chemical activation of EDS1/PAD4 signaling leading to pathogen resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant and Cell Physiology 59(8):1592−1607

doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcy106

[123]

Noutoshi Y, Okazaki M, Kida T, Nishina Y, Morishita Y, et al. 2012. Novel Plant Immune-Priming Compounds Identified via High-Throughput Chemical Screening Target Salicylic Acid Glucosyltransferases in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 24(9):3795−3804

doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.098343

[124]

Park SW, Liu PP, Forouhar F, Vlot AC, Tong L, et al. 2009. Use of a synthetic salicylic acid analog to investigate the roles of methyl salicylate and its esterases in plant disease resistance. Journal of Biological Chemistry 284(11):7307−7317

doi: 10.1074/jbc.M807968200

[125]

Wu Y, Zhang D, Chu JY, Boyle P, Wang Y, et al. 2012. The Arabidopsis NPR1 Protein Is a Receptor for the Plant Defense Hormone Salicylic Acid. Cell Reports 1(6):639−647

doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.05.008

[126]

Ishihama N, Choi S, Noutoshi Y, Saska I, Asai S, et al. 2021. Oxicam-type non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs inhibit NPR1-mediated salicylic acid pathway. Nature Communications 12(1):7303

doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27489-w

[127]

Fan P, Aguilar E, Bradai M, Xue H, Wang H, et al. 2021. The receptor-like kinases BAM1 and BAM2 are required for root xylem patterning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 118(12):e2022547118

doi: 10.1073/pnas.2022547118

[128]

Liu HB, Li X, Cai J, Jiang LL, Zhang X, et al. 2023. A screening of inhibitors targeting the receptor kinase FERONIA reveals small molecules that enhance plant root immunity. Plant Biotechnology Journal 21(1):63−77

doi: 10.1111/pbi.13925

[129]

Hirakawa Y, Shinohara H, Welke K, Irle S, Matsubayashi Y, et al. 2017. Cryptic bioactivity capacitated by synthetic hybrid plant peptides. Nature Communications 8(1):14318

doi: 10.1038/ncomms14318

[130]

Wang L, Maier LP, Pham N, Wang YL, Wang X, et al. 2025. A receptor antagonist counterbalances multiple systemin phytocytokines in tomato. Cell 188(23):6509−6518.e12

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2025.07.044

[131]

Banari A, Samanta AK, Munke A, Laugks T, Bajt S, et al. 2025. Advancing time-resolved structural biology: latest strategies in cryo-EM and X-ray crystallography. Nature Methods 22(7):1420−1435

doi: 10.1038/s41592-025-02659-6

[132]

Vaidya AS, Peterson FC, Yarmolinsky D, Merilo E, Verstraeten I. et al. 2017. A rationally designed agonist defines subfamily IIIA abscisic acid receptors as critical targets for manipulating transpiration. ACS Chemical Biology 12(11):2842−2848

doi: 10.1021/acschembio.7b00650

[133]

Gao Y, Ma M, Li W, Lei X. 2024. Chemoproteomics, A Broad Avenue to Target Deconvolution. Advanced Science 11(8):2305608

doi: 10.1002/advs.202305608

[134]

Chen MM, Kopittke PM, Zhao FJ, Wang P. 2024. Applications and opportunities of click chemistry in plant science. Trends in Plant Science 29(2):167−178

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2023.07.003

[135]

Lu Q, Zhang Y, Hellner J, Giannini C, Xu X, et al. 2022. Proteome-wide cellular thermal shift assay reveals unexpected cross-talk between brassinosteroid and auxin signaling. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 119(11):e2118220119

doi: 10.1073/pnas.2118220119

[136]

Jumper J, Evans R, Pritzel A, Green T, Figurnov M, et al. 2021. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596(7873):583−589

doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2

[137]

Zheng L, Meng J, Jiang K, Lan H, Wang Z, et al. 2022. Improving protein–ligand docking and screening accuracies by incorporating a scoring function correction term. Briefings in Bioinformatics 23(3):bbac051

doi: 10.1093/bib/bbac051

[138]

Sim J, Kim D, Kim B, Choi J, Lee J. 2025. Recent advances in AI-driven protein-ligand interaction predictions. Current Opinion in Structural Biology 92:103020

doi: 10.1016/j.sbi.2025.103020

[139]

Bang D, Lim S, Lee S, Kim S. 2023. Biomedical knowledge graph learning for drug repurposing by extending guilt-by-association to multiple layers. Nature Communications 14(1):3570

doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39301-y

[140]

Sanchez-Munoz R, Depaepe T, Samalova M, Hejatko J, Zaplana I, et al. 2025. Machine-learning meta-analysis reveals ethylene as a central component of the molecular core in abiotic stress responses in Arabidopsis. Nature Communications 16(1):4778

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-59542-3

[141]

Ang ACH, Østergaard L. 2023. Save your TIRs – more to auxin than meets the eye. New Phytologist 238(3):971−976

doi: 10.1111/nph.18783

[142]

Burrell T, Fozard S, Holroyd GH, French AP, Pound MP, et al. 2017. The Microphenotron: a robotic miniaturized plant phenotyping platform with diverse applications in chemical biology. Plant Methods 13(1):10

doi: 10.1186/s13007-017-0158-6

[143]

Depaepe T, Vélez Ramirez AI, Vandenbussche F, Mishra R, Qureshi RJ, et al. 2025. MADI: a multispectral automated dynamic imager to monitor plant health. Plant Phenomics 7(2):100040

doi: 10.1016/j.plaphe.2025.100040

[144]

Békés M, Langley DR, Crews CM. 2022. PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 21(3):181−200

doi: 10.1038/s41573-021-00371-6

[145]

Rojas-Pierce M, Bednarek SY. 2025. Manipulation of targeted protein degradation in plant biology. Biochemical Society Transactions 53(02):409−418

doi: 10.1042/BST20230939

[146]

Leon RG, Bassham DC. 2024. PROTAC for agriculture: learning from human medicine to generate new biotechnological weed control solutions. Pest Management Science 80(2):262−266

doi: 10.1002/ps.7741

[147]

Chen IJ, Lo WS, Chuang JY, Cheuh CM, Fan YS, et al. 2013. A chemical genetics approach reveals a role of brassinolide and cellulose synthase in hypocotyl elongation of etiolated Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Science 209:46−57

doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2013.04.005

[148]

Hu Y, Depaepe T, Smet D, Hoyerova K, Klíma P, et al. 2017. ACCERBATIN, a small molecule at the intersection of auxin and reactive oxygen species homeostasis with herbicidal properties. Journal of Experimental Botany 68(15):4185−4203

doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx242

[149]

Depaepe T, Prinsen E, Hu Y, Sanchez-Munoz R, Denoo B, et al. 2024. Arinole, a novel auxin-stimulating benzoxazole, affects root growth and promotes adventitious root formation. Journal of Experimental Botany 75(18):5681−5702

doi: 10.1093/jxb/erae282

[150]

Vanderstraeten L, Depaepe T, Bertrand S, Van Der Straeten D. 2019. The ethylene precursor ACC affects early vegetative development independently of ethylene signaling. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:1591

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01591

[151]

Rademacher W. 2017. Chemical regulators of gibberellin status and their application in plant production. In Annual Plant Reviews online. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 359–403 doi: 10.1002/9781119312994.apr0541

[152]

Wang X, Ma Y, Jia L, Luo X, Wang H, et al. 2023. Plant growth regulator residues in fruits and vegetables marketed in Yinchuan and exposure risk assessment. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 124:105661

doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2023.105661

[153]

Calatrava V, Hom EFY, Guan Q, Llamas A, Fernández E, et al. 2024. Genetic evidence for algal auxin production in Chlamydomonas and its role in algal-bacterial mutualism. iScience 27(1):11

doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.108762

[154]

Xu HQ, Xiao H, Bu JH, Hong YF, Liu YH, et al. 2023. EMNPD: a comprehensive endophytic microorganism natural products database for prompt the discovery of new bioactive substances. Journal of Cheminformatics 15(1):115

doi: 10.1186/s13321-023-00779-9