doi:10.48130/prkm-0025-0031

[1]

Ueckerdt F, Bauer C, Dirnaichner A, Everall J, Sacchi R, et al. 2021. Potential and risks of hydrogen-based e-fuels in climate change mitigation. Nature Climate Change 11:384−393

doi: 10.1038/s41558-021-01032-7

[2]

Pitsch H, Goeb D, Cai L, Willems W. 2024. Potential of oxymethylene ethers as renewable diesel substitute. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 104:101173

doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2024.101173

[3]

Zhang C, He J, Li Y, Li X, Li P. 2015. Ignition delay times and chemical kinetics of diethoxymethane/O₂/Ar mixtures. Fuel 154:346−351

doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2015.04.005

[4]

Hu E, Gao Z, Liu Y, Yin G, Huang Z. 2017. Experimental and modeling study on ignition delay times of dimethoxy methane/n-heptane blends. Fuel 189:350−357

doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.10.106

[5]

Sun W, Tao T, Lailliau M, Hansen N, Yang B, et al. 2018. Exploration of the oxidation chemistry of dimethoxymethane: jet-stirred reactor experiments and kinetic modeling. Combustion and Flame 193:491−501

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.04.008

[6]

Drost S, Schießl R, Werler M, Sommerer J, Maas U. 2019. Ignition delay times of polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether fuels (OME₂ and OME₃) and air: measurements in a rapid compression machine. Fuel 258:116070

doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116070

[7]

Herzler J, Fikri M, Schulz C. 2020. High-pressure shock-tube study of the ignition and product formation of fuel-rich dimethoxymethane (DMM)/air and CH₄/DMM/air mixtures. Combustion and Flame 216:293−299

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.03.008

[8]

Eckart S, Cai L, Fritsche C, vom Lehn F, Pitsch H, et al. 2021. Laminar burning velocities, CO, and NO_x emissions of premixed polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether flames. Fuel 293:120321

doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120321

[9]

Wang Q, Sun W, Guo L, Lin S, Cheng P, et al. 2021. Experimental and kinetic study on the laminar burning speed, Markstein length and cellular instability of oxygenated fuels. Fuel 297:120754

doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120754

[10]

Zhong X, Wang H, Zuo Q, Zheng Z, Wang J, et al. 2021. Experimental and kinetic modeling studies of polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether (PODE) pyrolysis in jet stirred reactor. Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 159:105332

doi: 10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105332

[11]

Gaiser N, Bierkandt T, Oßwald P, Zinsmeister J, et al. 2022. Oxidation of oxymethylene ether (OME₀₋₅): an experimental systematic study by mass spectrometry and photoelectron photoion coincidence spectroscopy. Fuel 313:122650

doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.122650

[12]

Ngugi JM, Richter S, Braun-Unkhoff M, Naumann C, Köhler M, et al. 2022. A study on fundamental combustion properties of oxymethylene ether-2. Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power 144:011014

doi: 10.1115/1.4052097

[13]

Wang H, Yao Z, Zhong X, Zuo Q, Zheng Z, et al. 2022. Experimental and kinetic modeling studies on low-temperature oxidation of Polyoxymethylene Dimethyl Ether (DMM_1-3) in a jet-stirred reactor. Combustion and Flame 245:112332

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2022.112332

[14]

Daly CA, Simmie JM, Dagaut P, Cathonnet M. 2001. Oxidation of dimethoxymethane in a jet-stirred reactor. Combustion and Flame 125:1106−1117

doi: 10.1016/S0010-2180(01)00227-9

[15]

Dias V, Lories X, Vandooren J. 2010. Lean and rich premixed dimethoxymethane/oxygen/argon flames: experimental and modeling. Combustion Science and Technology 182:350−364

doi: 10.1080/00102200903462458

[16]

Marrodán L, Monge F, Millera Á, Bilbao R, Alzueta MU. 2016. Dimethoxymethane oxidation in a flow reactor. Combustion Science and Technology 188:719−729

doi: 10.1080/00102202.2016.1138826

[17]

Vermeire FH, Carstensen HH, Herbinet O, Battin-Leclerc F, Marin GB, et al. 2018. Experimental and modeling study of the pyrolysis and combustion of dimethoxymethane. Combustion and Flame 190:270−283

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.12.001

[18]

Jacobs S, Döntgen M, Alquaity ABS, Kopp WA, Kröger LC, et al. 2019. Detailed kinetic modeling of dimethoxymethane. Part II: experimental and theoretical study of the kinetics and reaction mechanism. Combustion and Flame 205:522−533

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.12.026

[19]

Li N, Sun W, Liu S, Qin X, Zhao Y, et al. 2021. A comprehensive experimental and kinetic modeling study of dimethoxymethane combustion. Combustion and Flame 233:111583

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111583

[20]

Golka L, Gratzfeld D, Weber I, Olzmann M. 2020. Temperature- and pressure-dependent kinetics of the competing C–O bond fission reactions of dimethoxymethane. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 22:5523−5530

doi: 10.1039/D0CP00136H

[21]

Minwegen H, Döntgen M, Hemken C, Büttgen RD, Leonhard K, et al. 2019. Experimental and theoretical investigations of methyl formate oxidation including hot β-scission. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 37:307−314

doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2018.06.111

[22]

Shrestha KP, Eckart S, Elbaz AM, Giri BR, Fritsche C, et al. 2020. A comprehensive kinetic model for dimethyl ether and dimethoxymethane oxidation and NO_x interaction utilizing experimental laminar flame speed measurements at elevated pressure and temperature. Combustion and Flame 218:57−74

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.04.016

[23]

Sun W, Wang G, Li S, Zhang R, Yang B, et al. 2017. Speciation and the laminar burning velocities of poly(oxymethylene) dimethyl ether 3 (POMDME3) flames: an experimental and modeling study. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 36:1269−1278

doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2016.05.058

[24]

Cai L, Pitsch H. 2014. Mechanism optimization based on reaction rate rules. Combustion and Flame 161:405−415

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.08.024

[25]

He T, Wang Z, You X, Liu H, Wang Y, et al. 2018. A chemical kinetic mechanism for the low- and intermediate-temperature combustion of Polyoxymethylene Dimethyl Ether 3 (PODE₃). Fuel 212:223−235

doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.09.080

[26]

Cai L, Jacobs S, Langer R, vom Lehn F, Heufer KA, et al. 2020. Auto-ignition of oxymethylene ethers (OME_n, n = 2–4) as promising synthetic e-fuels from renewable electricity: shock tube experiments and automatic mechanism generation. Fuel 264:116711

doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116711

[27]

De Ras K, Kusenberg M, Vanhove G, Fenard Y, Eschenbacher A, et al. 2022. A detailed experimental and kinetic modeling study on pyrolysis and oxidation of oxymethylene ether-2 (OME-2). Combustion and Flame 238:111914

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111914

[28]

De Ras K, Panaget T, Fenard Y, Aerssens J, Pillier L, et al. 2023. An experimental and kinetic modeling study on the low-temperature oxidation of oxymethylene ether-2 (OME-2) by means of stabilized cool flames. Combustion and Flame 253:112792

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2023.112792

[29]

Shrestha KP, Eckart S, Drost S, Fritsche C, Schießl R, et al. 2022. A comprehensive kinetic modeling of oxymethylene ethers (OME_n, n = 1–3) oxidation - laminar flame speed and ignition delay time measurements. Combustion and Flame 246:112426

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2022.112426

[30]

Niu B, Jia M, Chang Y, Duan H, Dong X, et al. 2021. Construction of reduced oxidation mechanisms of polyoxymethylene dimethyl ethers (PODE_1–6) with consistent structure using decoupling methodology and reaction rate rule. Combustion and Flame 232:111534

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111534

[31]

Dinelli T, Pegurri A, Bertolino A, Parente A, Faravelli T, et al. 2024. A data-driven, lumped kinetic modeling of OME₂₋₅ pyrolysis and oxidation. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 40:105547

doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2024.105547

[32]

De Ras K, Herbinet O, Battin-Leclerc F, Eschenbacher A, Kusenberg M, et al. 2025. A Fundamental investigation of the pyrolysis chemistry of oxymethylene ethers. Part II: experiments and comprehensive model analysis. Combustion and Flame 275:114122

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2025.114122

[33]

De Ras K, Kusenberg M, Thybaut JW, Van Geem KM. 2023. Unraveling the carbene chemistry of oxymethylene ethers: experimental investigation and kinetic modeling of the high-temperature pyrolysis of OME-2. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 39:125−133

doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2022.07.069

[34]

Turányi T, Nagy T, Zsély IG, Cserháti M, Varga T, et al. 2012. Determination of rate parameters based on both direct and indirect measurements. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics 44:284−302

doi: 10.1002/kin.20717

[35]

Zsély IG, Varga T, Nagy T, Cserháti M, Turányi T, et al. 2012. Determination of rate parameters of cyclohexane and 1-hexene decomposition reactions. Energy 43:85−93

doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.004

[36]

Zhang P, Zsély IG, Samu V, Nagy T, Turányi T. 2021. Comparison of methane combustion mechanisms using shock tube and rapid compression machine ignition delay time measurements. Energy & Fuels 35:12329−12351

doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c04277

[37]

Kawka L, Juhász G, Papp M, Nagy T, Zsély IG, et al. 2020. Comparison of detailed reaction mechanisms for homogeneous ammonia combustion. Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie 234:1329−1357

doi: 10.1515/zpch-2020-1649

[38]

Yuan J, Yang J, Deng J, Li L, Cai L. 2024. Comparison of chemical mechanisms for the oxidation of hydrogen/ammonia mixtures based on different evaluation methods. International Journal of Chemical Kinetics 56:613−621

doi: 10.1002/kin.21747

[39]

Sheen DA, You X, Wang H, Løvås T. 2009. Spectral uncertainty quantification, propagation and optimization of a detailed kinetic model for ethylene combustion. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 32:535−542

doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2008.05.042

[40]

Cai L, Pitsch H. 2015. Optimized chemical mechanism for combustion of gasoline surrogate fuels. Combustion and Flame 162:1623−1637

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.11.018

[41]

Olm C, Zsély IG, Pálvölgyi R, Varga T, Nagy T, et al. 2014. Comparison of the performance of several recent hydrogen combustion mechanisms. Combustion and Flame 161:2219−2234

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.03.006

[42]

Zhang P, Zsély IG, Papp M, Nagy T, Turányi T. 2022. Comparison of methane combustion mechanisms using laminar burning velocity measurements. Combustion and Flame 238:111867

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2021.111867

[43]

Ngũgĩ J M, Richter S, Braun-Unkhoff M, Naumann C, Riedel U. 2022. A study on fundamental combustion properties of oxymethylene ether-1, the primary reference fuel 90, and their blend: experiments and modeling. Combustion and Flame 243:111996

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2022.111996

[44]

Sun W, Liu Z, Zhang Y, Zhai Y, Cao C, et al. 2021. Comparing the pyrolysis kinetics of dimethoxymethane and 1, 2-dimethoxyethane: an experimental and kinetic modeling study. Combustion and Flame 226:260−273

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2020.12.013

[45]

Gao Z, Hu E, Xu Z, Yin G, Huang Z. 2019. Low to intermediate temperature oxidation studies of dimethoxymethane/n-heptane blends in a jet-stirred reactor. Combustion and Flame 207:20−35

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.05.015

[46]

Qiu Z, Zhong A, Huang Z, Han D. 2022. An experimental and modeling study on polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether 3 (PODE₃) oxidation in a jet stirred reactor. Fundamental Research 2:738−747

doi: 10.1016/j.fmre.2021.09.005

[47]

Richter S, Kathrotia T, Braun-Unkhoff M, Naumann C, Köhler M. 2021. Influence of oxymethylene ethers (OME_n) in mixtures with a diesel surrogate. Energies 14:7848

doi: 10.3390/en14237848

[48]

Pitsch H. 1998. FlameMaster: A C++ computer program for 0D combustion and 1D laminar flame calculations. CA, USA: Sandia National Laboratories, Livermore. https://web.stanford.edu/group/pitsch/FlameMaster.htm

[49]

Cai L, Minwegen H, Kruse S, Daniel Büttgen R, Hesse R, et al. 2019. Exploring the combustion chemistry of a novel lignocellulose-derived biofuel: cyclopentanol. Part II: experiment, model validation, and functional group analysis. Combustion and Flame 210:134−144

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2019.08.025

[50]

Cai L, Sudholt A, Lee DJ, Egolfopoulos FN, Pitsch H, et al. 2014. Chemical kinetic study of a novel lignocellulosic biofuel: di-n-butyl ether oxidation in a laminar flow reactor and flames. Combustion and Flame 161:798−809

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.10.003

[51]

Lizardo-Huerta JC, Sirjean B, Glaude PA, Fournet R. 2017. Pericyclic reactions in ether biofuels. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 36:569−576

doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2016.07.035

[52]

Al-Otaibi JS, Abdel-Rahman MA, Almuqrin AH, El-Gogary TM, Mahmoud MAM, et al. 2021. Thermo-kinetic theoretical studies on pyrolysis of dimethoxymethane fuel additive. Fuel 290:119970

doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119970

[53]

Yasunaga K, Gillespie F, Simmie JM, Curran HJ, Kuraguchi Y, et al. 2010. A multiple shock tube and chemical kinetic modeling study of diethyl ether pyrolysis and oxidation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 114:9098−9109

doi: 10.1021/jp104070a

[54]

Van de Vijver R, Zádor J. 2020. KinBot: automated stationary point search on potential energy surfaces. Computer Physics Communications 248:106947

doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2019.106947

[55]

Zhu Q, Lyu JY, He R, Bai X, Li Y, et al. 2023. Detailed kinetic mechanism of polyoxymethylene dimethyl ether 3 (PODE₃). Part I: Ab initio thermochemistry and kinetic predictions for key reactions. Combustion and Flame 256:112990

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2023.112990

[56]

Konnov AA, Mohammad A, Kishore VR, Kim NI, Prathap C, et al. 2018. A comprehensive review of measurements and data analysis of laminar burning velocities for various fuel+air mixtures. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 68:197−267

doi: 10.1016/j.pecs.2018.05.003

[57]

Kelley AP, Smallbone AJ, Zhu DL, Law CK. 2011. Laminar flame speeds of C₅ to C₈ n-alkanes at elevated pressures: experimental determination, fuel similarity, and stretch sensitivity. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 33:963−970

doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2010.06.074

[58]

Mehl M, Herbinet O, Dirrenberger P, Bounaceur R, Glaude PA, et al. 2015. Experimental and modeling study of burning velocities for alkyl aromatic components relevant to diesel fuels. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 35:341−348

doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2014.06.064

[59]

Wu F, Kelley AP, Law CK. 2012. Laminar flame speeds of cyclohexane and mono-alkylated cyclohexanes at elevated pressures. Combustion and Flame 159:1417−1425

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.11.012

[60]

Batiot B, Rogaume T, Collin A, Richard F, Luche J. 2016. Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of Arrhenius parameters in order to describe the kinetic of solid thermal degradation during fire phenomena. Fire Safety Journal 82:76−90

doi: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2016.03.007

[61]

Sun W, Chen Z, Gou X, Ju Y. 2010. A path flux analysis method for the reduction of detailed chemical kinetic mechanisms. Combustion and Flame 157:1298−1307

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2010.03.006

[62]

Matsugi A, Terashima H. 2017. Diffusive-thermal effect on local chemical structures in premixed hydrogen–air flames. Combustion and Flame 179:238−241

doi: 10.1016/j.combustflame.2017.02.013

[63]

Li Y, Zhou CW, Somers KP, Zhang K, Curran HJ. 2017. The oxidation of 2-butene: a high pressure ignition delay, kinetic modeling study and reactivity comparison with isobutene and 1-butene. Proceedings of the Combustion Institute 36:403−411

doi: 10.1016/j.proci.2016.05.052