doi:10.48130/scm-0026-0018

[1]

Sun Z, Liao Y, Zhang Y, Sun S, Kan Q, et al. 2025. Sustainable carbon materials in environmental and energy applications. Sustainable Carbon Materials 1:e007

doi: 10.48130/scm-0025-0002

[2]

Liu Z, Li J, Buettner M, Ranganathan RV, Uddi M, et al. 2019. Metal–support interactions in CeO₂- and SiO₂-supported cobalt catalysts: effect of support morphology, reducibility, and interfacial configuration. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 11:17035−17049

doi: 10.1021/acsami.9b02455

[3]

Han J, Yang J, Zhang Z, Jiang X, Liu W, et al. 2023. Strong metal–support interaction facilitated multicomponent alloy formation on metal oxide support. Journal of the American Chemical Society 145:22671−22684

doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c07915

[4]

Jeon OS, Lee H, Lee KS, Paidi VK, Ji Y, et al. 2022. Harnessing strong metal–support interaction to proliferate the dry reforming of methane performance by in situ reduction. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 14:12140−12148

doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c20889

[5]

Pu T, Zhang W, Zhu M. 2023. Engineering heterogeneous catalysis with strong metal–support interactions: characterization, theory and manipulation. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62:e202212278

doi: 10.1002/anie.202212278

[6]

Wang F, Pace R, Ji Y, Jiang J, Jiang X, et al. 2022. Effect of Pd promotion and catalyst support on the Ni-catalyzed deoxygenation of tristearin to fuel-like hydrocarbons. Renewable Energy 195:1468−1479

doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.065

[7]

Luo Z, Zhao G, Pan H, Sun W. 2022. Strong metal–support interaction in heterogeneous catalysts. Advanced Energy Materials 12:2201395

doi: 10.1002/aenm.202201395

[8]

Wu P, Tan S, Moon J, Yan Z, Fung V, et al. 2020. Harnessing strong metal–support interactions via a reverse route. Nature Communications 11:3042

doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16674-y

[9]

Hou Z, Cui C, Yang Y, Huang Z, Zhuang Y, et al. 2024. Strong metal-support interactions in heterogeneous oxygen electrocatalysis. Small 20:2407167

doi: 10.1002/smll.202407167

[10]

Wang Y, Zhu S, Lu J, Liu J, Zhao Y, et al. 2022. Boosting hydrogen production from steam reforming of glycerol via constructing moderate metal-support interaction in Ni@Al₂O₃ catalyst. Fuel 324:124583

doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124583

[11]

Chen H, Bai W, He Y, Pfefferle LD, Qi S, et al. 2018. Catalytic hydrogenation of octanoic acid in the gaseous phase on Ni catalysts: the effect of support species and structure. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 57:16272−16283

doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b04141

[12]

Mierczynski P, Mosinska M, Stepinska N, Chalupka K, Nowosielska M, et al. 2021. Effect of the support composition on catalytic and physicochemical properties of Ni catalysts in oxy-steam reforming of methane. Catalysis Today 364:46−60

doi: 10.1016/j.cattod.2020.05.037

[13]

Zhao W, Fu Q, Xie B, Ni Z, Xia S. 2024. Mechanistic study of transition metal loaded/doped Ni−MgO catalyzed dry reforming of methane: DFT calculations. Chemical Physics Letters 853:141538

doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2024.141538

[14]

Lee J, Jang EJ, Oh DG, Szanyi J, Kwak JH. 2020. Morphology and size of Pt on Al₂O₃: the role of specific metal-support interactions between Pt and Al₂O₃. Journal of Catalysis 385:204−212

doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2020.03.019

[15]

Yang X, Meng Q, Ding G, Wang Y, Chen H, et al. 2018. Construction of novel Cu/ZnO-Al₂O₃ composites for furfural hydrogenation: the role of Al components. Applied Catalysis A: General 561:78−86

doi: 10.1016/j.apcata.2018.04.005

[16]

Gao M, Zhang J, Zhu P, Liu X, Zheng Z. 2022. Unveiling the origin of alkali metal promotion in CO₂ methanation over Ru/ZrO₂. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 314:121476

doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121476

[17]

Han A, Ding J, Zhong Q. 2022. Role of single-atom Pd in Cu/ZrO₂ catalysts for CO₂ hydrogenation to methanol. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 641:128535

doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128535

[18]

Lee K, Woo R, Woo HC, Ko G, Cho K, et al. 2024. Unraveling the role of MgO in the Ru-Ba/MgO catalyst for boosting ammonia synthesis: comparative study of MgO and MgAlO_x supports. Journal of Catalysis 434:115530

doi: 10.1016/j.jcat.2024.115530

[19]

Liu J, Li C, Niu H, Liang C. 2022. Role of metal (Pt)–support (MgO) interactions in base-free glucose dehydrogenation. Catalysis Science & Technology 12:6849−6855

doi: 10.1039/D2CY01428A

[20]

Javaid R, Nanba T. 2023. Efficient Ru/MgO–CeO₂ catalyst for ammonia synthesis as a hydrogen and energy carrier. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 48:11214−11224

doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.05.280

[21]

Lombard CJ, van Sittert CGCE, Mugo JN, Perry C, Willock DJ. 2023. Computational investigation of α-SiO₂ surfaces as a support for Pd. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 25:6121−6130

doi: 10.1039/D2CP04722E

[22]

Gosavi A, Mirkin C, Notestein J. 2020. Mapping the thermal entrenchment behavior of Pd nanoparticles on planar SiO₂ supports. Nanoscale 12:14245−14258

doi: 10.1039/D0NR02941F

[23]

Wang HY, Ruckenstein E. 2000. Carbon dioxide reforming of methane to synthesis gas over supported rhodium catalysts: the effect of support. Applied Catalysis A: General 204:143−152

doi: 10.1016/S0926-860X(00)00547-0

[24]

Drummond ML, Sumpter BG, Shelton WA, Larese JZ. 2007. Electronic structure investigation of surface−adsorbate and adsorbate−adsorbate interactions in multilayers of CH₄ on MgO(100). The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 111:966−976

doi: 10.1021/jp065211q

[25]

Kresse G, Joubert D. 1999. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Physical Review B 59:1758−1775

doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758

[26]

Doust Mohammadi M, Abdullah HY, Kalamse V, Chaudhari A. 2022. Bromochlorodifluoromethane interaction with pristine and doped BN nanosheets: a DFT study. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering 10:108367

doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2022.108367

[27]

Momma K, Izumi F. 2011. VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data. Journal of Applied Crystallography 44:1272−1276

doi: 10.1107/S0021889811038970

[28]

Wang V, Xu N, Liu JC, Tang G, Geng WT. 2021. VASPKIT: a user-friendly interface facilitating high-throughput computing and analysis using VASP code. Computer Physics Communications 267:108033

doi: 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108033

[29]

Araújo TP, Morales-Vidal J, Giannakakis G, Mondelli C, Eliasson H, et al. 2023. Reaction-induced metal-metal oxide interactions in Pd-In₂O₃/ZrO₂ catalysts drive selective and stable CO₂ hydrogenation to methanol. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 62:e202306563

doi: 10.1002/anie.202306563

[30]

Prašnikar A, Pavlišič A, Ruiz-Zepeda F, Kovač J, Likozar B. 2019. Mechanisms of copper-based catalyst deactivation during CO₂ reduction to methanol. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 58:13021−13029

doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.9b01898

[31]

Jin B, Li S, Liang X. 2021. Enhanced activity and stability of MgO-promoted Ni/Al₂O₃ catalyst for dry reforming of methane: role of MgO. Fuel 284:119082

doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2020.119082

[32]

Shi C, Zhang P. 2015. Role of MgO over γ-Al₂O₃-supported Pd catalysts for carbon dioxide reforming of methane. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 170−171:43−52

doi: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2015.01.034

[33]

Yu YX, Yang J, Zhu KK, Sui ZJ, Chen D, et al. 2021. High-throughput screening of alloy catalysts for dry methane reforming. ACS Catalysis 11:8881−8894

doi: 10.1021/acscatal.0c04911

[34]

Pizzolitto C, Pupulin E, Menegazzo F, Ghedini E, Di Michele A, et al. 2019. Nickel based catalysts for methane dry reforming: effect of supports on catalytic activity and stability. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 44:28065−28076

doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.09.050

[35]

Zhang L, Li L, Li J, Zhang Y, Hu J. 2014. Carbon dioxide reforming of methane over nickel catalyst supported on MgO(111) nanosheets. Topics in Catalysis 57:619−626

doi: 10.1007/s11244-013-0220-1

[36]

Therdthianwong S, Siangchin C, Therdthianwong A. 2008. Improvement of coke resistance of Ni/Al₂O₃ catalyst in CH₄/CO₂ reforming by ZrO₂ addition. Fuel Processing Technology 89:160−168

doi: 10.1016/j.fuproc.2007.09.003

[37]

Abahussain AAM, Al-Fatesh AS, Singh SK, Almutairi G, Fakeeha AH, et al. 2024. Cs promoted Ni/ZrO₂-Al₂O₃ catalysts for dry reforming of methane: promotional effects of Cs for enhanced catalytic activity and stability. Arabian Journal of Chemistry 17:105564

doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2023.105564

[38]

Al-Doghachi FAJ, Taufiq-Yap YH. 2018. CO₂ reforming of methane over Ni/MgO catalysts promoted with Zr and La oxides. ChemistrySelect 3:816−827

doi: 10.1002/slct.201701883

[39]

Xu Y, Du XH, Li J, Wang P, Zhu J, et al. 2019. A comparison of Al₂O₃ and SiO₂ supported Ni-based catalysts in their performance for the dry reforming of methane. Journal of Fuel Chemistry and Technology 47:199−208

doi: 10.1016/S1872-5813(19)30010-6

[40]

Zhang X, Wang F, Song Z, Zhang S. 2020. Comparison of carbon deposition features between Ni/ZrO₂ and Ni/SBA-15 for the dry reforming of methane. Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis 129:457−470

doi: 10.1007/s11144-019-01707-5