Back Article

USDA Foreign Agricultural Service. 2025. Production, Supply and Distribution Online - Fruits Summary . www.fas.usda.gov/data/production/commodity-group/fruits

Gabay G, Flaishman MA. 2024. Genetic and molecular regulation of chilling requirements in pear: breeding for climate change resilience. Frontiers in Plant Science 15:1347527

Gottschalk C, Bell RL, Volk GM, Dardick C. 2024. Over a century of pear breeding at the USDA. Frontiers in Plant Science 15:1474143

Quinet M, Wesel JP. 2019. Botany and taxonomy of pear. In The Pear Genome. Compendium of Plant Genomes, ed. Korban S. Cham: Springer. pp 1–33 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-11048-2_1

Ramirez-Ramirez AR, Bidot-Martínez I, Mirzaei K, Rasoamanalina Rivo OL, Menéndez-Grenot M, et al. 2024. Comparing the performances of SSR and SNP markers for population analysis in Theobroma cacao L., as alternative approach to validate a new ddRADseq protocol for cacao genotyping. PLoS One 19(5):e0304753

Singh N, Choudhury DR, Singh AK, Kumar S, Srinivasan K, et al. 2013. Comparison of SSR and SNP markers in estimation of genetic diversity and population structure of Indian rice varieties. PloS One 8(12):e84136

García C, Guichoux E, Hampe A. 2018. A comparative analysis between SNPs and SSRs to investigate genetic variation in a juniper species (Juniperus phoenicea ssp. turbinata) . Tree Genetics & Genomes 14(6):87

Xue H, Wang S, Yao JL, Deng CH, Wang L, et al. 2018. Chromosome level high-density integrated genetic maps improve the Pyrus bretschneideri 'DangshanSuli' v1.0 genome. BMC Genomics 19(1):833

Fernández-Fernández F, Harvey NG, James CM. 2006. Isolation and characterization of polymorphic microsatellite markers from European pear (Pyrus communis L.). Molecular Ecology Notes 6(4):1039−1041

Evans KM, Fernandez-Fernandez F, Govan C. 2009. Harmonising fingerprinting protocols to allow comparisons between germplasm collections - Pyrus . Acta Horticulturae 814:103−106

Evans KM, Fernández-Fernández F, Bassil N, Nyberg A, Postman J. 2015. Comparison of accessions from the UK and US national pear germplasm collections with a standardized set of microsatellite markers. Acta Horticulturae 1094:41−46

Zurn JD, Nyberg A, Montanari S, Postman J, Neale D, et al. 2020. A new SSR fingerprinting set and its comparison to existing SSR- and SNP-based genotyping platforms to manage Pyrus germplasm resources. Tree Genetics & Genomes 16(5):72

Kocsisné GM, Bolla D, Anhalt-Brüderl UCM, Forneck A, Taller J, et al. 2020. Genetic diversity and similarity of pear (Pyrus communis L.) cultivars in Central Europe revealed by SSR markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 67(7):1755−1763

Draga S, Palumbo F, Miracolo Barbagiovanni I, Pati F, Barcaccia G. 2023. Management of genetic erosion: the (successful) case study of the pear (Pyrus communis L.) germplasm of the Lazio region (Italy). Frontiers in Plant Science 13:1099420

Çoban A, Değirmenci FÖ, Uluğ A, Ateş MA, Yüksel E, et al. 2024. Genetic analysis of village pear (Pyrus communis L.) cultivar populations in northeastern Türkiye. Plant Genetic Resources 22(6):408−416

Velázquez-Barrera ME, Ramos-Cabrer AM, Pereira-Lorenzo S, Ríos-Mesa DJ. 2022. Genetic Pool of the Cultivated Pear Tree (Pyrus spp.) in the Canary Islands (Spain), Studied Using SSR Molecular Markers. Agronomy 12(7):1711

Jiang S, An H, Wang X, Shi C, Luo J, et al. 2019. The genotypes of polymorphic simple sequence repeat loci revealed by whole-genome resequencing data of 30 Pyrus accessions. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 144(5):321−328

Linsmith G, Rombauts S, Montanari S, Deng CH, Celton JM, et al. 2019. Pseudo-chromosome–length genome assembly of a double haploid "Bartlett" pear (Pyrus communis L.). GigaScience 8(12):giz138

Yocca A, Akinyuwa M, Bailey N, Cliver B, Estes H, et al. 2024. A chromosome-scale assembly for 'd'Anjou' pear. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 14(3):jkae003

Shirasawa K, Itai A, Isobe S. 2021. Chromosome-scale genome assembly of Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) variety 'Nijisseiki'. DNA Research 28(2):dsab001

Dong X, Wang Z, Tian L, Zhang Y, Qi D, et al. 2020. De novo assembly of a wild pear (Pyrus betuleafolia) genome. Plant Biotechnology Journal 18(2):581−595

Wu J, Li LT, Li M, Khan MA, Li XG, et al. 2014. High-density genetic linkage map construction and identification of fruit-related QTLs in pear using SNP and SSR markers. Journal of Experimental Botany 65(20):5771−5781

Montanari S, Postman J, Bassil NV, Neale DB. 2020. Reconstruction of the largest pedigree network for pear cultivars and evaluation of the genetic diversity of the USDA-ARS national Pyrus collection. G3 Genes|Genomes|Genetics 10(9):3285−3297

Gao Z, Ma N, Qi Y, Kan L, Xu Y. 2025. Genetic Relationships and Population Structure of Pear Accessions from Anhui, China, Based on Genotyping-by-Sequencing. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 43(1):216−26

Han H, Oh Y, Kim K, Oh S, Cho S, et al. 2019. Integrated genetic linkage maps for Korean pears (Pyrus hybrid) using GBS-based SNPs and SSRs. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology 60(5):779−786

Kim K, Oh Y, Han H, Oh S, Lim H, et al. 2019. Genetic relationships and population structure of pears (Pyrus spp.) assessed with genome-wide SNPs detected by genotyping-by-sequencing. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology 60(6):945−953

Kumar S, Kirk C, Deng C, Wiedow C, Knaebel M, et al. 2017. Genotyping-by-sequencing of pear (Pyrus spp.) accessions unravels novel patterns of genetic diversity and selection footprints. Horticulture Research 4:17015

Montanari S, Bianco L, Allen BJ, Martínez-García PJ, Bassil NV, et al. 2019. Development of a highly efficient Axiom^TM 70 K SNP array for Pyrus and evaluation for high-density mapping and germplasm characterization. BMC Genomics 20(1):331

Campbell NR, Harmon SA, Narum SR. 2015. Genotyping-in-Thousands by sequencing (GT-seq): a cost effective SNP genotyping method based on custom amplicon sequencing. Molecular Ecology Resources 15(4):855−867

Garrett MJ, Nerkowski SA, Kieran S, Campbell NR, Barbosa S, et al. 2024. Development and validation of a GT-seq panel for genetic monitoring in a threatened species using minimally invasive sampling. Ecology and Evolution 14(5):e11321

Petrou EL, Brandt CD, Spivey TJ, Gruenthal KM, McKeeman CM, et al. 2025. Development of a genotyping-in-thousands by sequencing (GT-Seq) panel for identifying individuals and estimating relatedness among Alaska black bears (Ursus americanus). Ecology and Evolution 15(4):e71273

Jo J, Kim Y, Kim GW, Kwon JK, Kang BC. 2021. Development of a panel of genotyping-in-thousands by sequencing in capsicum. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:769473

Yang GQ, Chen YM, Wang JP, Guo C, Zhao L, et al. 2016. Development of a universal and simplified ddRAD library preparation approach for SNP discovery and genotyping in angiosperm plants. Plant Methods 12:39

Peterson BK, Weber JN, Kay EH, Fisher HS, Hoekstra HE. 2012. Double Digest RADseq: an inexpensive method for de novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species. PLoS One 7(5):e37135

Catchen J, Hohenlohe PA, Bassham S, Amores A, Cresko WA. 2013. Stacks: an analysis tool set for population genomics. Molecular Ecology 22(11):3124−40

Chen S. 2025. fastp 1.0: an ultra-fast all-round tool for FASTQ data quality control and preprocessing. iMeta 4(5):e70078

Li H. 2013. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv Preprint 1303.3997v2

McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, et al. 2010. The genome analysis toolkit: a mapreduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Research 20(9):1297−1303

Danecek P, Auton A, Abecasis G, Albers CA, Banks E, et al. 2011. The variant call format and VCFtools. Bioinformatics 27(15):2156−2158

Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, et al. 2007. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. The American Journal of Human Genetics 81(3):559−575

Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155(2):945−59

Lee TH, Guo H, Wang X, Kim C, Paterson AH. 2014. SNPhylo: a pipeline to construct a phylogenetic tree from huge SNP data. BMC Genomics 15(1):162

Yu G, Smith DK, Zhu H, Guan Y, Lam TT. 2017. ɢɢᴛʀᴇᴇ: an ʀ package for visualization and annotation of phylogenetic trees with their covariates and other associated data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 8(1):28−36

Weiß CL, Pais M, Cano LM, Kamoun S, Burbano HA. 2018. nQuire: a statistical framework for ploidy estimation using next generation sequencing. BMC Bioinformatics 19(1):122

Manichaikul A, Mychaleckyj JC, Rich SS, Daly K, Sale M, et al. 2010. Robust relationship inference in genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics 26(22):2867−2873

Kechin A, Borobova V, Boyarskikh U, Khrapov E, Subbotin S, et al. 2020. NGS-PrimerPlex: high-throughput primer design for multiplex polymerase chain reactions. PLoS Computational Biology 16(12):e1008468

Subramanian S, Ramasamy U, Chen D. 2019. VCF2PopTree: a client-side software to construct population phylogeny from genome-wide SNPs. PeerJ 7:e8213

Huang K, Dunn DW, Ritland K, Li B. 2020. ᴘᴏʟʏɢᴇɴᴇ: Population genetics analyses for autopolyploids based on allelic phenotypes. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 11(3):448−456

Nishitani C, Terakami S, Sawamura Y, Takada N, Yamamoto T. 2009. Development of novel EST-SSR markers derived from Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia). Breeding Science 59(4):391−400

Liebhard R, Gianfranceschi L, Koller B, Ryder CD, Tarchini R, et al. 2002. Development and characterisation of 140 new microsatellites in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Molecular Breeding 10(4):217−241

Yamamoto T, Kimura T, Sawamura Y, Manabe T, Kotobuki K, et al. 2002. Simple sequence repeats for genetic analysis in pear. Euphytica 124(1):129−137

Guilford P, Prakash S, Zhu JM, Rikkerink E, Gardiner S, et al. 1997. Microsatellites in Malus × domestica (apple): abundance, polymorphism and cultivar identification. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 94(2):249−254

Gianfranceschi L, Seglias N, Tarchini R, Komjanc M, Gessler C. 1998. Simple sequence repeats for the genetic analysis of apple. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 96(8):1069−76

Hokanson SC, Szewc-McFadden AK, Lamboy WF, McFerson JR. 1998. Microsatellite (SSR) markers reveal genetic identities, genetic diversity and relationships in a Malus × domestica Borkh. core subset collection. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 97(5):671−83

Xue L, Liu Q, Hu H, Song Y, Fan J, et al. 2018. The southwestern origin and eastward dispersal of pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) in East Asia revealed by comprehensive genetic structure analysis with SSR markers. Tree Genetics & Genomes 14(4):48

Gabay G, Dahan Y, Izhaki Y, Faigenboim A, Ben-Ari G, et al. 2018. High-resolution genetic linkage map of European pear (Pyrus communis) and QTL fine-mapping of vegetative budbreak time. BMC Plant Biology 18(1):175

Li J, Zhang M, Li X, Khan A, Kumar S, et al. 2022. Pear genetics: Recent advances, new prospects, and a roadmap for the future. Horticulture Research 9:uhab040

Sun C, Wang R, Li J, Li X, Song B, et al. 2025. Pan-transcriptome analysis provides insights into resistance and fruit quality breeding of pear (Pyrus pyrifolia). Journal of Integrative Agriculture 24(5):1813−1830

Irisarri P, Urrestarazu J, Ramos-Cabrer A, Pereira-Lorenzo S, Velázquez-Barrera ME, et al. 2024. Unlocking Spanish pear genetic diversity: strategies for construction of a national core collection. Scientific Reports 14:26555

Quinlan AR, Marth GT. 2007. Primer-site SNPs mask mutations. Nature Methods 4(3):192−192

Wu J, Wang Z, Shi Z, Zhang S, Ming R, et al. 2013. The genome of the pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.). Genome Research 23(2):396−408

Glenn TC, Pierson TW, Bayona-Vásquez NJ, Kieran TJ, Hoffberg SL, et al. 2019. Adapterama II: universal amplicon sequencing on Illumina platforms (TaggiMatrix). PeerJ 7:e7786

Kebschull JM, Zador AM. 2015. Sources of PCR-induced distortions in high-throughput sequencing data sets. Nucleic Acids Research 43(21):e143

Schmidt TL, Jasper ME, Weeks AR, Hoffmann AA. 2021. Unbiased population heterozygosity estimates from genome-wide sequence data. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 12(10):1888−1898