[1]

FAO. 2018. The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Rome, Italy: FAO https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/87109e17-2bb7-4d20-874b-160ac0a2b131
[2]

Blanchard JL, Watson RA, Fulton EA, Cottrell RS, Nash KL, et al. 2017. Linked sustainability challenges and trade-offs among fisheries, aquaculture and agriculture. Nature Ecology & Evolution 1(9):1240−1249

doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0258-8
[3]

Naylor RL, Hardy RW, Buschmann AH, Bush SR, Cao L, et al. 2021. A 20-year retrospective review of global aquaculture. Nature 591:551−563

doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03308-6
[4]

Olesen I, Gjedrem T, Bentsen HB, Gjerde B, Rye M. 2003. Breeding programs for sustainable aquaculture. Journal of Applied Aquaculture 133:179−204

doi: 10.1300/J028v13n03_01
[5]

Yue GH. 2014. Recent advances of genome mapping and marker-assisted selection in aquaculture. Fish and Fisheries 15(3):376−396

doi: 10.1111/faf.12020
[6]

Xu Y, Zhang X, Li H, Zheng H, Zhang J, et al. 2022. Smart breeding driven by big data, artificial intelligence, and integrated genomic-enviromic prediction. Molecular Plant 15(11):1664−1695

doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2022.09.001
[7]

Zhang C, Jiang S, Tian Y, Dong X, Xiao J, et al. 2023. Smart breeding driven by advances in sequencing technology. Modern Agriculture 1(1):43−56

doi: 10.1002/moda.8
[8]

Yue G, Wang L. 2017. Current status of genome sequencing and its applications in aquaculture. Aquaculture 468(Part 1):337−347

doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.10.036
[9]

Houston RD, Bean TP, Macqueen DJ, Gundappa MK, Jin YH, et al. 2020. Harnessing genomics to fast-track genetic improvement in aquaculture. Nature Reviews Genetics 21(7):389−409

doi: 10.1038/s41576-020-0227-y
[10]

Yang Z, Yu Y, Tay YX, Yue GH. 2022. Genome editing and its applications in genetic improvement in aquaculture. Reviews in Aquaculture 14(1):178−191

doi: 10.1111/raq.12591
[11]

Mandal A, Ghosh AR. 2023. Role of artificial intelligence (AI) in fish growth and health status monitoring: a review on sustainable aquaculture. Aquaculture International 32(3):2791−2820

doi: 10.1007/s10499-023-01297-z
[12]

Yue K, Shen Y. 2022. An overview of disruptive technologies for aquaculture. Aquaculture and Fisheries 7(2):111−120

doi: 10.1016/j.aaf.2021.04.009
[13]

Fu G, Yuna Y. 2022. Phenotyping and phenomics in aquaculture breeding. Aquaculture and Fisheries 7(2):140−146

doi: 10.1016/j.aaf.2021.07.001
[14]

Song H, Dong T, Yan X, Wang W, Tian Z, et al. 2022. Genomic selection and its research progress in aquaculture breeding. Reviews in Aquaculture 15(1):274−291

doi: 10.1111/raq.12716
[15]

Cui M, Liu X, Liu H, Zhao J, Li D, et al. 2025. Fish tracking, counting, and behaviour analysis in digital aquaculture: a comprehensive survey. Reviews in Aquaculture 17(1):e13001

doi: 10.1111/raq.13001
[16]

Yanez JM, Barria A, Lopez ME, Moen T, Garcia BF, et al. 2023. Genome-wide association and genomic selection in aquaculture. Reviews in Aquaculture 15(2):645−675

doi: 10.1111/raq.12750
[17]

Yáñez JM, Joshi R, Yoshida GM. 2020. Genomics to accelerate genetic improvement in tilapia. Animal Genetics 51(5):658−674

doi: 10.1111/age.12989
[18]

Syed S, Ortega S, Anderssen KE, Nilsen HA, Heia K. 2024. Hyperspectral imaging and deep learning for parasite detection in white fish under industrial conditions. Scientific Reports 14(1):27426

doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76808-w
[19]

Shendure J, Ji H. 2008. Next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature Biotechnology 26(10):1135−1145

doi: 10.1038/nbt1486
[20]

Zhang G, Fang X, Guo X, Li L, Luo R, et al. 2012. The oyster genome reveals stress adaptation and complexity of shell formation. Nature 490(7418):49−54

doi: 10.1038/nature11413
[21]

Andersen LK, Thompson NF, Abernathy JW, Ahmed RO, Ali A, et al. 2025. Advancing genetic improvement in the omics era: status and priorities for United States aquaculture. BMC Genomics 26(1):155

doi: 10.1186/s12864-025-11247-z
[22]

Naish KA, Hard JJ. 2008. Bridging the gap between the genotype and the phenotype: linking genetic variation, selection and adaptation in fishes. Fish and Fisheries 9(4):396−422

doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2008.00302.x
[23]

Liu Z, Zhou T, Gao D. 2022. Genetic and epigenetic regulation of growth, reproduction, disease resistance and stress responses in aquaculture. Frontiers in Genetics 13:994471

doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.994471
[24]

Ceballos‐Concha A, Asche F, Cárdenas‐Retamal R. 2024. Salmon aquaculture in Chile: production growth and socioeconomic impacts. Reviews in Aquaculture 17(1):e12993

doi: 10.1111/raq.12993
[25]

Afewerki S, Asche F, Misund B, Thorvaldsen T, Tveteras R. 2023. Innovation in the Norwegian aquaculture industry. Reviews in Aquaculture 15(2):759−771

doi: 10.1111/raq.12755
[26]

Gilbey J, Verspoor E, Mo TA, Sterud E, Olstad K, et al. 2006. Identification of genetic markers associated with Gyrodactylus salaris resistance in atlantic salmon Salmo salar. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 71(2):119−129

doi: 10.3354/dao071119
[27]

Sturm A, Carmona-Antoñanzas G, Humble JL, Croton C, Boyd S, et al. 2024. QTL mapping provides new insights into emamectin benzoate resistance in salmon lice, Lepeophtheirus salmonis. BMC Genomics 25(1):1212

doi: 10.1186/s12864-024-11096-2
[28]

Sinclair-Waters M, Nome T, Wang J, Lien S, Kent MP, et al. 2022. Dissecting the loci underlying maturation timing in Atlantic salmon using haplotype and multi-SNP based association methods. Heredity 129(6):356−365

doi: 10.1038/s41437-022-00570-w
[29]

Houston R, Gheyas A, Hamilton A, Guy D, Tinch A, et al. 2008. Detection and confirmation of a major QTL affecting resistance to infectious pancreatic necrosis (IPN) in atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Developments in Biologicals 132:199−204

doi: 10.1159/000317160
[30]

D’Ambrosio J, François Y, Morin T, Courant S, Desgranges A, et al. 2025. High-density genome-wide association study points out major candidate genes for resistance to infectious pancreatic necrosis in rainbow trout. Genetics Selection Evolution 57(1):50

doi: 10.1186/s12711-025-00996-w
[31]

Moen T, Sonesson AK, Hayes B, Lien S, Munck H, et al. 2007. Mapping of a quantitative trait locus for resistance against infectious salmon anaemia in atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): comparing survival analysis with analysis on affected/resistant data. BMC Genetics 8:53

doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-8-53
[32]

Dussault FM, Ang KP, Elliott JA, Glebe BD, Leadbeater S, et al. 2019. Mapping quantitative trait loci for infectious salmon anaemia resistance in a North American strain of atlantic salmon. Aquaculture Research 51(1):80−90

doi: 10.1111/are.14349
[33]

Wang L, Bai B, Huang S, Liu P, Wan ZY, et al. 2017. QTL mapping for resistance to iridovirus in asian seabass using genotyping-by-sequencing. Marine Biotechnology 19(5):517−527

doi: 10.1007/s10126-017-9770-8
[34]

Yue GH, Wang L, Yang Z, Sun F, Tay YX, et al. 2023. Genomic resources and their applications in aquaculture of Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer). Reviews in Aquaculture 15(2):853−871

doi: 10.1111/raq.12764
[35]

Wang CM, Lo LC, Zhu ZY, Yue GH. 2006. A genome scan for quantitative trait loci affecting growth-related traits in an F1 family of Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer). BMC Genomics 7:274

doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-274
[36]

Baranski M, Moen T, Våge DI. 2010. Mapping of quantitative trait loci for flesh colour and growth traits in atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Genetics Selection Evolution 42(1):17

doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-42-17
[37]

Liu F, Sun F, Xia JH, Li J, Fu GH, et al. 2014. A genome scan revealed significant associations of growth traits with a major QTL and GHR2 in tilapia. Scientific Reports 4:7256

doi: 10.1038/srep07256
[38]

Ye H, Liu Y, Liu X, Wang X, Wang Z. 2014. Genetic mapping and QTL analysis of growth traits in the large yellow croaker Larimichthys crocea. Marine Biotechnology 16(6):729−738

doi: 10.1007/s10126-014-9590-z
[39]

Wringe BF, Devlin RH, Ferguson MM, Moghadam HK, Sakhrani D, et al. 2010. Growth-related quantitative trait loci in domestic and wild rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). BMC Genetics 11:63

doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-11-63
[40]

Wong J, Yeo S, Tsai TH, Tay Y, Yang Z, et al. 2025. Mutations upstream of ppp2ca affect body weight in asian seabass. Marine Biotechnology 27(6):149

doi: 10.1007/s10126-025-10527-9
[41]

Liu P, Wang L, Wan ZY, Ye BQ, Huang S, et al. 2016. Mapping QTL for resistance against viral nervous necrosis disease in Asian seabass. Marine Biotechnology 18(1):107−116

doi: 10.1007/s10126-015-9672-6
[42]

Mukiibi R, Ferraresso S, Franch R, Peruzza L, Dalla Rovere G, et al. 2025. Integrated functional genomic analysis identifies regulatory variants underlying a major QTL for disease resistance in European sea bass. BMC Biology 23(1):75

doi: 10.1186/s12915-025-02180-4
[43]

Yue GH. 2025. Asian seabass (Lates calcarifer): a versatile species for marine and freshwater aquaculture. Reviews in Aquaculture 17(4):e70054

doi: 10.1111/raq.70054
[44]

Zhao J, Bai H, Ke Q, Li B, Zhou Z, et al. 2021. Genomic selection for parasitic ciliate Cryptocaryon irritans resistance in large yellow croaker. Aquaculture 531:735786

doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735786
[45]

D’Agaro E, Favaro A, Matiussi S, Gibertoni PP, Esposito S. 2021. Genomic selection in salmonids: new discoveries and future perspectives. Aquaculture International 29(5):2259−2289

doi: 10.1007/s10499-021-00747-w
[46]

Bangera R, Correa K, Lhorente JP, Figueroa R, Yáñez JM. 2017. Genomic predictions can accelerate selection for resistance against Piscirickettsia salmonis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). BMC Genomics 18(1):121

doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3487-y
[47]

Jin J, Wu Y, Li Y, Yan C, Liu X, et al. 2025. Genomic selection study on the resistance of large yellow croaker (Larimichthys crocea) to scuticociliate. Aquaculture 609:742773

doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2025.742773
[48]

Meuwissen T, Hayes B, Goddard M. 2016. Genomic selection: a paradigm shift in animal breeding. Animal Frontiers 6(1):6−14

doi: 10.2527/af.2016-0002
[49]

Meuwissen TH, Indahl UG, Ødegård J. 2017. Variable selection models for genomic selection using whole-genome sequence data and singular value decomposition. Genetics Selection Evolution 49(1):94

doi: 10.1186/s12711-017-0369-3
[50]

Sánchez‐Martínez JG, Aguirre‐Guzmán G, Mejía‐Ruíz H. 2007. White spot syndrome virus in cultured shrimp: a review. Aquaculture Research 38(13):1339−1354

doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2007.01827.x
[51]

Zorriehzahra MJ, Banaederakhshan R. 2015. Early mortality syndrome (EMS) as new emerging threat in shrimp industry. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences 3(2s):64−72

doi: 10.14737/journal.aavs/2015/3.2s.64.72
[52]

Nimlamai A, Khanbo S, Wirojsirasak W, Ukoskit K. 2025. Association mapping of early mortality syndrome - acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease tolerance in Litopenaeus vannamei. Science & Technology Asia 30(3):243−253
[53]

Lillehammer M, Bangera R, Salazar M, Vela S, Erazo EC, et al. 2020. Genomic selection for white spot syndrome virus resistance in whiteleg shrimp boosts survival under an experimental challenge test. Scientific Reports 10:20571

doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77580-3
[54]

Kayansamruaj P, Dinh‐Hung N, Srisapoome P, Na‐Nakorn U, Chatchaiphan S. 2023. Genomics-driven prophylactic measures to increase streptococcosis resistance in tilapia. Journal of Fish Diseases 46(6):597−610

doi: 10.1111/jfd.13763
[55]

Shoemaker CA, Lozano CA, LaFrentz BR, García JC, Soto E, et al. 2017. Additive genetic variation in resistance of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) to Streptococcus iniae and S. agalactiae capsular type Ib: is genetic resistance correlated? Aquaculture 468(Part 1):193−198

doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.10.022
[56]

Vela-Avitúa S, LaFrentz BR, Lozano CA, Shoemaker CA, Ospina-Arango JF, et al. 2023. Genome-wide association study for Streptococcus iniae in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) identifies a significant QTL for disease resistance. Frontiers in Genetics 14:1078381

doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1078381
[57]

Pan JM, Guo HY, Liu BS, Zhang N, Xian L, et al. 2025. SNPs in the Galectin-8 gene of Acanthopagrus latus have been found to be associated with resistance trait to Streptococcus iniae. Aquaculture International 33(1):19

doi: 10.1007/s10499-024-01710-1
[58]

Mushtaq MW, Bhat IA, Bhat RAH. 2026. Genomic Selection in Aquaculture Breeding Programs: Advancing Food Security. In Aquatic Genomics and Food Security, eds. Ishfaq Nazir M, Ahmad I. Cham: Springer. pp. 291–305 doi: 10.1007/978-3-0-14971-8_12
[59]

Wang Q, Wu J. 2025. Marker-assisted selection for fast-growth and high-yield tilapia breeds. Animal Molecular Breeding 15(2):82−90

doi: 10.5376/amb.2025.15.0009
[60]

Yoshida GM, Lhorente JP, Correa K, Soto J, Salas D, et al. 2019. Genome-wide association study and cost-efficient genomic predictions for growth and fillet yield in nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 9(8):2597−2607

doi: 10.1534/g3.119.400116
[61]

De Ronne M, Légaré G, Belzile F, Boyle B, Torkamaneh D. 2023. 3D-GBS: a universal genotyping-by-sequencing approach for genomic selection and other high-throughput low-cost applications in species with small to medium-sized genomes. Plant Methods 19(1):13

doi: 10.1186/s13007-023-00990-7
[62]

Alhaqbani A, Kurdi HA, Hosny M. 2022. Fish-inspired heuristics: a survey of the state-of-the-art methods. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 29(6):3655−3675

doi: 10.1007/s11831-022-09711-0
[63]

Gratacap RL, Wargelius A, Edvardsen RB, Houston RD. 2019. Potential of genome editing to improve aquaculture breeding and production. Trends in Genetics 35(9):672−684

doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2019.06.006
[64]

Doudna JA, Charpentier E. 2014. Genome editing. The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science 346(6213):1258096

doi: 10.1126/science.1258096
[65]

Pickar-Oliver A, Gersbach CA. 2019. The next generation of CRISPR-Cas technologies and applications. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 20(8):490−507

doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0131-5
[66]

Gjedrem T, Baranski M. 2009. The success of selective breeding in aquaculture. In Selective Breeding in Aquaculture: An Introduction. Reviews: Methods and Technologies in Fish Biology and Fisheries. Vol. 10. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 13–23 doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-2773-3_3
[67]

Lee SJ, McPherron AC. 2001. Regulation of myostatin activity and muscle growth. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A 98(16):9306−9311

doi: 10.1073/pnas.151270098
[68]

Ohama M, Washio Y, Kishimoto K, Kinoshita M, Kato K. 2020. Growth performance of myostatin knockout red sea bream Pagrus major juveniles produced by genome editing with CRISPR/Cas9. Aquaculture 529(2):735672

doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2020.735672
[69]

Sun T, Meng X, Li Y, Zhang H, He R, et al. 2026. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated myostatin b knockout enhances growth performance and muscle hypertrophy in grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella). Aquaculture 613(Part 1):743355

doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2025.743355
[70]

Yang Z, Wang L, Sun F, Wong J, Lee M, et al. 2026. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated mstnb knockout enhances muscle growth in salt-tolerant tilapia. Aquaculture 618:743829

doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2026.743829
[71]

Alvanou MV, Gkagkavouzis K, Karaiskou N, Feidantsis K, Lattos A, et al. 2023. Mediterranean aquaculture and genetic pollution: a review combined with data from a fish farm evaluating the ecological risks of finfish escapes. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 11(7):1405

doi: 10.3390/jmse11071405
[72]

Gao ZX, Draper BW. 2018. Gene knockout and its principle and application in sex control of fish species. In Sex Control in Aquaculture, eds. Wang HP, Piferrer F, Chen SL, Shen ZG. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. pp. 117–136 doi: 10.1002/9781119127291.ch5
[73]

Liu F, Sun F, Yue G. 2026. Generating YY supermales and validating amh as the sex-determining gene in salt-tolerant pink tilapia. Aquaculture 613(Part 1):743305

doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2025.743305
[74]

Hallerman EM, Dunham R, Houston RD, Walton M, Wargelius A, et al. 2023. Towards production of genome-edited aquaculture species. Reviews in Aquaculture 15(2):404−408

doi: 10.1111/raq.12739
[75]

Robinson NA, Østbye TKK, Kettunen AH, Coates A, Barrett LT, et al. 2024. A guide to assess the use of gene editing in aquaculture. Reviews in Aquaculture 16(2):775−784

doi: 10.1111/raq.12866
[76]

Wang J, Cheng Y. 2024. Enhancing aquaculture disease resistance: antimicrobial peptides and gene editing. Reviews in Aquaculture 16(1):433−451

doi: 10.1111/raq.12845
[77]

Lourenço VM, Ogutu JO, Rodrigues RA, Posekany A, Piepho HP. 2024. Genomic prediction using machine learning: a comparison of the performance of regularized regression, ensemble, instance-based and deep learning methods on synthetic and empirical data. BMC Genomics 25(1):152

doi: 10.1186/s12864-023-09933-x
[78]

Fan Y, Waldmann P. 2025. Multi-task genomic prediction using gated residual variable selection neural networks. BMC Bioinformatics 26(1):167

doi: 10.1186/s12859-025-06188-z
[79]

Vu NT, Phuc TH, Oanh KTP, Sang NV, Trang TT, et al. 2022. Accuracies of genomic predictions for disease resistance of striped catfish to edwardsiella ictaluri using artificial intelligence algorithms. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 12(1): jkab361

doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab361
[80]

Huang M, Wang L, Wang B, Jiang W, Yu Y, et al. 2025. Integrating computer vision and machine learning technologies for model building to quantify intermuscular fat content in salmonid fillets. Food Control 175:111293

doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2025.111293
[81]

Ranjan R, Shroff H, Sharrer K, Tsukuda S, Good C. 2024. FilletCam AI: a handheld tool for precise fillet color profiling of Atlantic salmon and rainbow trout. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research 18:101461

doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101461
[82]

Öz M, Üstüner E, Çifci S, Budak F, İleri E, et al. 2025. Artificial intelligence for fish disease diagnosis and management: innovations, challenges, and One Health implications. Aquaculture International 33:652

doi: 10.1007/s10499-025-02352-7
[83]

Wang Y, Ni P, Sturrock M, Zeng Q, Wang B, et al. 2024. Deep learning for genomic selection of aquatic animals. Marine Life Science & Technology 6:631−650

doi: 10.1007/s42995-024-00252-y
[84]

Harvey TN, Dvergedal H, Grønvold L, Jin Y, Ødegård J, et al. 2024. Linking genomic prediction of fillet fat content in Atlantic salmon to underlying changes in lipid metabolism regulation. Aquaculture 584:740678

doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2024.740678
[85]

Li G, Yao Z, Hu Y, Lian A, Yuan T, et al. 2024. Deep learning-based fish detection using above-water infrared camera for deep-sea aquaculture: a comparison study. Sensors 24(8):2430

doi: 10.3390/s24082430
[86]

Fernandes AFA, Turra EM, de Alvarenga ÉR, Passafaro TL, Lopes FB, et al. 2020. Deep Learning image segmentation for extraction of fish body measurements and prediction of body weight and carcass traits in Nile tilapia. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 170:105274

doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105274
[87]

Wu Y, Wang X, Shi Y, Wang Y, Qian D, et al. 2024. Fish feeding intensity assessment method using deep learning-based analysis of feeding splashes. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 221:108995

doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2024.108995
[88]

Qiu YC, Wang KJ. 2025. Deep learning model for detecting fish foraging movement and distance. Ecological Informatics 92:103472

doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103472
[89]

Olsen AS, Rosin PL, Jones CB, Cable J, Perkins SE. 2025. Computer vision for infectious disease surveillance; Saprolegnia spp. in salmonids. Ecological Informatics 93:103567

doi: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2025.103567
[90]

Ahmed MS, Jeba SM. 2024. SalmonScan: a novel image dataset for machine learning and deep learning analysis in fish disease detection in aquaculture. Data in Brief 54:110388

doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2024.110388
[91]

Hamazaki K, Iwata H. 2024. AI-assisted selection of mating pairs through simulation-based optimized progeny allocation strategies in plant breeding. Frontiers in Plant Science 15:1361894

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1361894
[92]

Hassanpour A, Geibel J, Simianer H, Rohde A, Pook T. 2025. Optimization of breeding program design through stochastic simulation with evolutionary algorithms. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 15(1):jkae248

doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae248
[93]

Akdemir D, Beavis W, Fritsche-Neto R, Singh AK, Isidro-Sánchez J. 2019. Multi-objective optimized genomic breeding strategies for sustainable food improvement. Heredity 122(5):672−683

doi: 10.1038/s41437-018-0147-1
[94]

Shrote RZ, Thompson AM. 2024. PyBrOpS: a Python package for breeding program simulation and optimization for multi-objective breeding. G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics 14(10):jkae199

doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkae199
[95]

Moeinizade S, Hu G, Wang L. 2022. A reinforcement learning approach to resource allocation in genomic selection. Intelligent Systems with Applications 14:200076

doi: 10.1016/j.iswa.2022.200076
[96]

Guilder J, Ryder D, Taylor NGH, Alewijnse SR, Millard RS, et al. 2023. The aquaculture disease network model (AquaNet-Mod): a simulation model to evaluate disease spread and controls for the salmonid industry in England and Wales. Epidemics 44:100711

doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2023.100711
[97]

Ibrahim S, Yue C, Yang C, Yiting R, Xie B, et al. 2025. A review of genomics application in aquaculture: status, challenges, and priorities for future direction. Annals of Animal Science 26(3):695–715

doi: 10.2478/aoas-2025-0078
[98]

Yu X, Faggion S, Liu Y, Wang B, Zeng Q, et al. 2025. Role of multi-omics in aquaculture genetics and breeding: current status and future perspective. Science China Life Sciences 68(9):2591−2604

doi: 10.1007/s11427-024-2828-8
[99]

Pérez-Enciso M, Zingaretti L, de Los Campos G. 2025. Generative AI for predictive breeding: hopes and caveats. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 138(7):147

doi: 10.1007/s00122-025-04942-8
[100]

Morota G, Lee HJ, Lee SH, Park HB, Onogi A. 2026. Artificial intelligence in animal breeding and genetics: Applications, opportunities, and challenges. Animal Frontiers 16(2):99–107

doi: 10.1093/af/vfaf058
[101]

Chuai G, Ma H, Yan J, Chen M, Hong N, et al. 2018. DeepCRISPR: optimized CRISPR guide RNA design by deep learning. Genome Biology 19(1):80

doi: 10.1186/s13059-018-1459-4
[102]

Wessels HH, Stirn A, Méndez-Mancilla A, Kim EJ, Hart SK, et al. 2024. Prediction of on-target and off-target activity of CRISPR-Cas13d guide RNAs using deep learning. Nature Biotechnology 42(4):628−637

doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01830-8
[103]

Zhao Y, Li X, Du Y. 2026. AI-driven CRISPR screening: optimizing gene editing through automation and intelligent decision support. Journal of Translational Medicine 24(1):419

doi: 10.1186/s12967-026-07849-0
[104]

Goodwin S, McPherson JD, McCombie WR. 2016. Coming of age: ten years of next-generation sequencing technologies. Nature Reviews Genetics 17(6):333−351

doi: 10.1038/nrg.2016.49
[105]

Zhu M, Sumana SL, Abdullateef MM, Falayi OC, Shui Y, et al. 2024. CRISPR/Cas9 technology for enhancing desirable traits of fish species in aquaculture. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25(17):9299

doi: 10.3390/ijms25179299
[106]

Wang P, Lehti-Shiu MD, Lotreck S, Segura Abá K, Krysan PJ, et al. 2024. Prediction of plant complex traits via integration of multi-omics data. Nature Communications 15(1):6856

doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50701-6
[107]

Gao L, Zhang L, Chen J, Peng L, Guo L, et al. 2025. From genes to phenotypes: a review of multilevel omics techniques in beef quality. Gene 962:149416

doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2025.149416
[108]

Huang Z, Ma A, Yang S, Liu X, Zhao T, et al. 2020. Transcriptome analysis and weighted gene co-expression network reveals potential genes responses to heat stress in turbot Scophthalmus maximus. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part D: Genomics and Proteomics 33:100632

doi: 10.1016/j.cbd.2019.100632
[109]

Li Y, Chia JM, Bartfai R, Christoffels A, Yue GH, et al. 2004. Comparative analysis of the testis and ovary transcriptomes in zebrafish by combining experimental and computational tools. Comparative and Functional Genomics 5:403−418

doi: 10.1002/cfg.418
[110]

Ubaida-Mohien C, Lyashkov A, Gonzalez-Freire M, Tharakan R, Shardell M, et al. 2019. Discovery proteomics in aging human skeletal muscle finds change in spliceosome, immunity, proteostasis and mitochondria. Elife 8:e49874

doi: 10.7554/eLife.49874
[111]

Vivekaa A, Nellore J, Sunkar S. 2025. Zebrafish metabolomics: a comprehensive approach to understanding health and disease. Functional & Integrative Genomics 25(1):110

doi: 10.1007/s10142-025-01621-1
[112]

Zhang J, Che Y, Liu R, Wang Z, Liu W. 2025. Deep learning–driven multi-omics analysis: enhancing cancer diagnostics and therapeutics. Briefings in Bioinformatics 26(4):bbaf440

doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaf440
[113]

Young T, Laroche O, Walker SP, Miller MR, Casanovas P, et al. 2023. Prediction of feed efficiency and performance-based traits in fish via integration of multiple omics and clinical covariates. Biology 12(8):1135

doi: 10.3390/biology12081135
[114]

Esmaeili N, Carter CG, Wilson R, Walker SP, Miller MR, et al. 2023. An integrated proteomics and metabolomics investigation of feed efficiency in seawater reared Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha). Aquaculture 562:738845

doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738845
[115]

Farooq MA, Gao S, Hassan MA, Huang Z, Rasheed A, et al. 2024. Artificial intelligence in plant breeding. Trends in Genetics 40(10):891−908

doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2024.07.001
[116]

Williams K, MacDonald M, Sternberg LdSL. 2003. Interactions of storm, drought, and sea-level rise on coastal forest: a case study. Journal of Coastal Research 19(4):1116−1121
[117]

Cai S, Sun C, Tian J. 2025. Towards smart agriculture: AI-driven prediction of key genes for revolutionizing crop breeding. Planta 262(5):116

doi: 10.1007/s00425-025-04841-8
[118]

Carter L. 2025. Advances in sustainable aquaculture: innovations in feed and farming practices. Journal of Fisheries Research 9(2):257

doi: 10.35841/aajfr-9.2.257
[119]

Lim KC, Yusoff FM, Natrah FMI, De Zoysa M, Yasin ISM, et al. 2025. Biological strategies in aquaculture disease management: Towards a sustainable blue revolution. Aquaculture & Fisheries 10(5):743−763

doi: 10.1016/j.aaf.2025.04.002
[120]

Yue G, Guo C. 2025. Strategies for managing major diseases in Asian seabass aquaculture. Animal Diseases 5(1):6

doi: 10.1186/s44149-025-00159-w
[121]

Naylor RL, Hardy RW, Bureau DP, Chiu A, Elliott M, et al. 2009. Feeding aquaculture in an era of finite resources. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences U S A 106(36):15103−15110

doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905235106
[122]

Campbell KB, McLean E, Barrows FT. 2022. In pursuit of fish-free feeds: a multi-species evaluation. Fishes 7(6):336

doi: 10.3390/fishes7060336
[123]

Yue G, Wang L, Sun F, Yang Z, Wong J, et al. 2024. Improving growth, omega-3 contents, and disease resistance of Asian seabass: status of a 20-year family-based breeding program. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 34:91−110

doi: 10.1007/s11160-023-09810-6
[124]

Houston RD, Kriaridou C, Robledo D. 2022. Animal board invited review: widespread adoption of genetic technologies is key to sustainable expansion of global aquaculture. Animal 16(10):100642

doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2022.100642
[125]

FAO. 2024. Global sustainable aquaculture advancement partnership. FAO Aquaculture Newsletter 68:5−9
[126]

Romana-Eguia MRR, Tongdee N, Lucente D, Mair GC. 2025. AquaGRIS: a valuable global information system in support of conservation, sustainable use, and management of aquatic genetic resources in Southeast Asia. Fish for the People 23(1):17–26