| [1] |
Lu C, Guo Z, Miao L. 2025. The hot topics and trends about research on the relationship between air pollution and urban green space based on ecosystem services perspective. |
| [2] |
Liu HM, Qian WQ, Tang LJ, Wu YH, Zeng JY. 2024. Assessment of land use change of ecological green wedge and cooling island effect: a case study of Wuhan, China. |
| [3] |
Kim JE, Eum JH, Son JM. 2026. Analysis of air temperature reduction and indirect carbon savings by strategies of urban green space creation. |
| [4] |
Elshabshiri A, Aly M, Alharbat R, Abdalla MJ, Alsyouf L, et al. 2025. Enhancing the microclimate of outdoor campus spaces in hot humid climates: the example of the University of Sharjah. |
| [5] |
Alfaridzi MS, Harahap SD, Bayanuddin AA, Rangga IA. 2026. Resource review: remote sensing of urban green space. |
| [6] |
Kasikam N, Yarnvudhi A, Leksungnoen N, Näsholm T, Tor-Ngern P. 2026. Effects of long term canopy change on regulating ecosystem services in a tropical urban park. |
| [7] |
Liu B, Huang H, Su Y, Chen S, Li Z, et al. 2022. Tree species classification using ground-based LiDAR data by various point cloud deep learning methods. |
| [8] |
Zhang H, Liu B, Yang B, Guo J, Hu Z, et al. 2025. Efficient tree species classification using machine and deep learning algorithms based on UAV-LiDAR data in North China. |
| [9] |
Chen X, Shen X, Cao L. 2023. Tree species classification in subtropical natural forests using high-resolution UAV RGB and SuperView-1 multispectral imageries based on deep learning network approaches: a case study within the Baima snow mountain national nature reserve, China. |
| [10] |
Reisi Gahrouei O, Côté JF, Bournival P, Giguère P, Béland M. 2024. Comparison of deep and machine learning approaches for Quebec tree species classification using a combination of multispectral and LiDAR data. |
| [11] |
Cai Y, Gao L, Jia C, Liu X, Wang G, et al. 2025. Coniferous tree species classification based on DMCA-Unet network model with UAV multispectral imagery. |
| [12] |
Zhang M, Li W, Liu H, Zhao X, Tao R. 2023. Classification of hyperspectral forest tree species based on morphological transform and spatial logical integration. |
| [13] |
Hong D, Han Z, Yao J, Gao L, Zhang B, et al. 2022. SpectralFormer: rethinking hyperspectral image classification with transformers. |
| [14] |
Man Q, Yang X, Liu H, Zhang B, Dong P, et al. 2025. Comparison of UAV-based LiDAR and photogrammetric point cloud for individual tree species classification of urban areas. |
| [15] |
Vahrenhold JR, Brandmeier M, Müller MS. 2025. MMTSCNet: multimodal tree species classification network for classification of multi-source, single-tree LiDAR point clouds. |
| [16] |
Hakula A, Ruoppa L, Lehtomäki M, Yu X, Kukko A, et al. 2023. Individual tree segmentation and species classification using high-density close-range multispectral laser scanning data. |
| [17] |
Wang L, Lu D, Xu L, Robinson DT, Tan W, et al. 2024. Individual tree species classification using low-density airborne multispectral LiDAR data via attribute-aware cross-branch transformer. |
| [18] |
Njimi H, Chehata N, Revers F. 2024. Fusion of dense airborne LiDAR and multispectral sentinel-2 and Pleiades satellite imagery for mapping riparian forest species biodiversity at tree level. |
| [19] |
Marrs J, Ni-Meister W. 2019. Machine learning techniques for tree species classification using co-registered LiDAR and hyperspectral data. |
| [20] |
Roffey M, Wang J. 2020. Evaluation of features derived from high-resolution multispectral imagery and LiDAR data for object-based support vector machine classification of tree species. |
| [21] |
Shi Y, Wang T, Skidmore AK, Heurich M. 2020. Improving LiDAR-based tree species mapping in Central European mixed forests using multi-temporal digital aerial colour-infrared photographs. |
| [22] |
Mäyrä J, Keski-Saari S, Kivinen S, Tanhuanpää T, Hurskainen P, et al. 2021. Tree species classification from airborne hyperspectral and LiDAR data using 3D convolutional neural networks. |
| [23] |
Chen K, Guan H, Wang L, Yu Y, Zang Y, et al. 2024. A feature perturbation weakly supervised learning network for airborne multispectral LiDAR pointcloud classification. |
| [24] |
Chen K, Wang Y, Huang C, Wang J, Li SL, et al. 2025. GreenNet: a dual-encoder network for urban green space classification using high-resolution remotely sensed images. |
| [25] |
You H, Feng Y, Zhao X, Zou C, Ji R, et al. 2019. PVRNet: point-view relation neural network for 3D shape recognition. |
| [26] |
He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. 2016. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Las Vegas: IEEE. pp. 770−778 doi: 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 |
| [27] |
Thomas H, Qi CR, Deschaud JE, Marcotegui B, Goulette F, et al. 2019. KPConv: flexible and deformable convolution for point clouds. 2019 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). Seoul: IEEE. pp. 6410−6419 doi: 10.1109/iccv.2019.00651 |
| [28] |
Hell M, Brandmeier M, Briechle S, Krzystek P. 2022. Classification of tree species and standing dead trees with lidar point clouds using two deep neural networks: PointCNN and 3DmFV-net. |
| [29] |
Briechle S, Krzystek P, Vosselman G. 2020. Classification of tree species and standing dead trees by fusing uav-based lidar data and multispectral imagery in the 3d deep neural network pointnet++. |
| [30] |
Chen Y, Liu X, Xiao Y, Zhao Q, Wan S. 2021. Three-dimensional urban land cover classification by prior-level fusion of LiDAR point cloud and optical imagery. |
| [31] |
Hu Q, Yang B, Xie L, Rosa S, Guo Y, et al. 2020. RandLA-net: efficient semantic segmentation of large-scale point clouds. 2020 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Seattle: IEEE. pp. 11105−11114 doi: 10.1109/cvpr42600.2020.01112 |
| [32] |
Li X, Wang L, Guan H, Chen K, Zang Y, et al. 2023. Urban tree species classification using UAV-based multispectral images and LiDAR point clouds. |
| [33] |
Hui Z, Jin S, Xia Y, Nie Y, Xie X, et al. 2021. A mean shift segmentation morphological filter for airborne LiDAR DTM extraction under forest canopy. |
| [34] |
Silva CA, Klauberg C, Hentz ÂMK, Dalla Corte AP, Ribeiro U, et al. 2018. Comparing the performance of ground filtering algorithms for terrain modeling in a forest environment using airborne LiDAR data. |
| [35] |
Qiu S, Anwar S, Barnes N. 2021. Semantic segmentation for real point cloud scenes via bilateral augmentation and adaptive fusion. 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Nashville: IEEE. pp. 1757−1767 doi: 10.1109/CVPR46437.2021.00180 |
| [36] |
Qian G, Li Y, Peng H, Mai J, Hammoud H, et al. 2022. PointNeXt: revisiting PointNet++ with improved training and scaling strategies. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35. New Orleans: Neural Information Processing Systems Foundation, Inc. (NeurIPS). pp. 23192−23204 doi: 10.52202/068431-1685 |
| [37] |
Fan S, Dong Q, Zhu F, Lv Y, Ye P, et al. 2021. SCF-net: learning spatial contextual features for large-scale point cloud segmentation. 2021 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). Nashville: IEEE. pp. 14499−14508 doi: 10.1109/cvpr46437.2021.01427 |
| [38] |
Shuai H, Xu X, Liu Q. 2021. Backward attentive fusing network with local aggregation classifier for 3D point cloud semantic segmentation. |
| [39] |
Vu T, Kim K, Luu TM, Nguyen T, Yoo CD. 2022. SoftGroup for 3D instance segmentation on point clouds. 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). New Orleans: IEEE. pp. 2698−2707 doi: 10.1109/cvpr52688.2022.00273 |
| [40] |
Chen M, Hu Q, Yu Z, Thomas H, Feng A, et al. 2022. STPLS3D: a large-scale synthetic and real aerial photogrammetry 3D point cloud dataset. Proceedings of the 33rd British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC 2022). London, United Kingdom. https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.09065 |