Search
1995 Volume 10
Article Contents
RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

Integration of Machine Learning and Knowledge Acquisition

More Information
  • “Integration of Machine Learning and Knowledge Acquisition” may be a surprising title for an ECAI-94 workshop, since most machine learning (ML) systems are intended for knowledge acquisition (KA). So what seems problematic about integrating ML and KA? The answer lies in the difference between the approaches developed by what is referred to as ML and KA research. Apart from sonic major exceptions, such as learning apprentice tools (Mitchell et al., 1989), or libraries like the Machine Learning Toolbox (MLT Consortium, 1993), most ML algorithms have been described without any characterization in terms of real application needs, in terms of what they could be effectively useful for. Although ML methods have been applied to “real world” problems few general and reusable conclusions have been drawn from these knowledge acquisition experiments. As ML techniques become more and more sophisticated and able to produce various forms of knowledge, the number of possible applications grows. ML methods tend then to be more precisely specified in terms of the domain knowledge initially required, the control knowledge to be set and the nature of the system output (MLT Consortium, 1993; Kodratoff et al., 1994).
  • 加载中
  • Adé H, De Raedt L and Bruynooghe M, 1995. “Declarative bias for specific-to-general ILP systems” Machine Learning (to appear).

    Google Scholar

    Anjewierden A, Shadbolt N and Wielinga BJ, 1992. “Supporting knowledge acquisition: The acknowledge project” In: Enhancing the Knowledge Engineering Process—Contributions from ESPRIT, pp 143–172, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar

    Bisson G, 1994. “From inductive learning to knowledge acquisition through explanations” In: Proc. EJAI-94 Workshop on Inegration of ML and KA, pp 1–11.

    Google Scholar

    Börner K and Janetzko D, 1994. “Case-based learning for knowledge-based design support” In: Proc. ECAI-94 Workshop on Integration of ML and KA, pp 12–18.

    Google Scholar

    Chandrasekaran B, 1989. “Task-structures, knowledge acquisition and learning” Machine Learning 4251–346. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar

    Consortium MLT, 1993. “Final Public Report.” Esprit II Project 2154.

    Google Scholar

    Dompseler HJH and Van Someren M, 1994. “Using models of problem solving as bias in automated knowledge acquisition.” In: Cohn AG (ed.), Proc. EcAI-94, pp 499–503.

    Google Scholar

    Feldman R, 1994. “FRST– an interactive revision system for forward chaining rule bases” In: Proc. ECA 1–94 Workshop on Integration of ML and KA, pp 19–28.

    Google Scholar

    Feldman R and Nédellec C, 1994. “A framework for specifying explicit bias for revision of approximate knowledge bases.” In: Gaines B and Musen M (eds.), Proc. Knowledge Acquisition Workshop (KAW-94), pp 15.1–15.19.

    Google Scholar

    Fensel D, Ganascia JG, Nédellec C, Plaza E, Rouveirol C, Van de Velde W and Van Someren M (eds.), 1995. Knowledge Level Modelling and Machine Learning, Heraklion, Greece.

    Google Scholar

    Ganascia JG, Thomas J and Laublet P, 1993. “Integrating models of knowledge and machine learning.” In: Brazdil PB (ed). Proc. ECML 93, pp 396–401, Vienna.

    Google Scholar

    Grosof B and Russell S, 1990. “Shift of bias as non-monotonic reasoning” In: Brazdil PB and Konolige K (eds.), Machine Learning, Meta-Reasoning and Logics. Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar

    Kodratoff Y, Moustakis V and Graner G, 1994. “Can machine learning solve my problem?” Applied Artificial Intelligence Journal8 (1) 1–31. Taylor & Francis Publishers.

    Google Scholar

    Mladenic D, Bratko I, Paul RJ and Grobelnik M, 1994. “Knowledge acquisition for discrete event systems using machine learning” In: Proc. ECA1–94 Workshop on integration of ML and KA, pp 29–36.

    Google Scholar

    Mitchell TM, 1991. “The need for biases in learning generalizations” In: Shavlik JW and Dietterich TG (eds.), Readings in Machine Learning, pp 184–191. Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar

    Mitchell TM, Mahadevan S and Steinberg LI, 1989. LEAP: A learning apprentice for VLSI design. In: Machine Learning III: An Artificial Intelligence Approach, pp 271–289, Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar

    Nédellec C and Causse K, 1992. “Knowledge refinement using knowledge acquisition and machine learning methods.” In: Wetter T et al. (eds.), Proc. 6th European Knowledge Acquisition Workshop (EKAW-92), pp.171–190, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar

    Nédellec C, Ferreira JL, Correia J and Costa E, 1995. “Machine learning goes to the bank.” Applied Artificial Intelligence Journal (Special Issue on Machine Learning), Kodratoff Y. (ed). Taylor & Francis Publishers.

    Google Scholar

    Nédellec C and Rouveirol C, 1994. “Specification of the HAIKU system.” Report 928, University of Paris- South.

    Google Scholar

    Park YT and Sung-Hee K, 1994. “Knowledge base refinement by failure driven approach.” In: Proc. ECAI-94 Workshop on integration of ML and KA, pp 37–43.

    Google Scholar

    Rouveirol C and Albert P, 1994. “Knowledge level model of a configurable learning system.” In: Steels L. et al. (eds.), Proc. 8th European Knowledge Acquisition Workshop (EKAW-94), pp 374–393, Springer- Verlag.

    Google Scholar

    Tausend B, 1994. “Modelling inductive learning for knowledge acquisition tasks.” In: Proc. ECAI-94 Workshop on integration of ML and KA, pp 45–49.

    Google Scholar

    Tecuci G, Kedar S and Kodratoff Y, 1993. Proc. IJCAI-93 Workshop on Machine Learning and Knowledge Acquisition: Common issues, Contrasting Methods, and Integrated Approaches.

    Google Scholar

    Thomas J, 1994. “Learning within a problem solving method: An empirical evaluation.” In: Proc. ECA1–94 Workshop on Integration of ML and KA, pp 51–57.

    Google Scholar

    Utgoff PE, 1986. “Shift of bias for inductive concept-learning” In: Michalski RS, Carbonell JG, and Mitchell TM (eds.), Machine Learning: An artificial intelligence approach, pp 107–148, Morgan Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar

    Van de Velde W and Aamodt A, 1992. “Machine learning issues in CommonKADS, ESPRIT Project KADS-II”.

    Google Scholar

    Van de Velde W, Fensel D, Plaza E and Van Someren M (eds.), 1994. Learning and Knowledge Level, MLnet Workshop, Catania, Italy.

    Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Claire Nédellec. 1995. Integration of Machine Learning and Knowledge Acquisition. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 10: doi: 10.1017/S026988890000730X
    Claire Nédellec. 1995. Integration of Machine Learning and Knowledge Acquisition. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 10: doi: 10.1017/S026988890000730X

Article Metrics

Article views(47) PDF downloads(421)

Other Articles By Authors

RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

Integration of Machine Learning and Knowledge Acquisition

The Knowledge Engineering Review  10 Article number: 10.1017/S026988890000730X  (1995)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: “Integration of Machine Learning and Knowledge Acquisition” may be a surprising title for an ECAI-94 workshop, since most machine learning (ML) systems are intended for knowledge acquisition (KA). So what seems problematic about integrating ML and KA? The answer lies in the difference between the approaches developed by what is referred to as ML and KA research. Apart from sonic major exceptions, such as learning apprentice tools (Mitchell et al., 1989), or libraries like the Machine Learning Toolbox (MLT Consortium, 1993), most ML algorithms have been described without any characterization in terms of real application needs, in terms of what they could be effectively useful for. Although ML methods have been applied to “real world” problems few general and reusable conclusions have been drawn from these knowledge acquisition experiments. As ML techniques become more and more sophisticated and able to produce various forms of knowledge, the number of possible applications grows. ML methods tend then to be more precisely specified in terms of the domain knowledge initially required, the control knowledge to be set and the nature of the system output (MLT Consortium, 1993; Kodratoff et al., 1994).

    • Copyright © Cambridge University Press 19951995Cambridge University Press
References (27)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Claire Nédellec. 1995. Integration of Machine Learning and Knowledge Acquisition. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 10: doi: 10.1017/S026988890000730X
    Claire Nédellec. 1995. Integration of Machine Learning and Knowledge Acquisition. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 10: doi: 10.1017/S026988890000730X
  • Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return