Search
2006 Volume 21
Article Contents
RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

How experts reason: the acquisition of experts' knowledge structures

More Information
  • We were faced with a shelved knowledge system at a health insurance company. The system used Bayesian statistics. For correct computations such a system is of course well suited, but not for the people who use it: people do not easily formulate their expertise in numerical probabilities. We addressed the question of whether it is possible to find out in which format experts do represent their knowledge, and if so, what format that is. This representation might then replace the format of numerical probabilities in the knowledge system's interface, increasing its ease of use. We found one method that includes, apart from a technique to elicit knowledge contents, techniques to also acquire its format: Cognitive Structure Analysis. In this contribution we discuss this method, use it in two studies, and show that it yields valid results. It gives insight into the format of experts' knowledge structures; experts turn out to use mainly frame representations.
  • 加载中
  • Cite this article

    ERWIN W. VAN GEENEN, CILIA L. M. WITTEMAN. 2006. How experts reason: the acquisition of experts' knowledge structures. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 21:68 doi: 10.1017/S0269888906000968
    ERWIN W. VAN GEENEN, CILIA L. M. WITTEMAN. 2006. How experts reason: the acquisition of experts' knowledge structures. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 21:68 doi: 10.1017/S0269888906000968

Article Metrics

Article views(17) PDF downloads(79)

Other Articles By Authors

RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

How experts reason: the acquisition of experts' knowledge structures

The Knowledge Engineering Review  21 Article number: 10.1017/S0269888906000968  (2006)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: We were faced with a shelved knowledge system at a health insurance company. The system used Bayesian statistics. For correct computations such a system is of course well suited, but not for the people who use it: people do not easily formulate their expertise in numerical probabilities. We addressed the question of whether it is possible to find out in which format experts do represent their knowledge, and if so, what format that is. This representation might then replace the format of numerical probabilities in the knowledge system's interface, increasing its ease of use. We found one method that includes, apart from a technique to elicit knowledge contents, techniques to also acquire its format: Cognitive Structure Analysis. In this contribution we discuss this method, use it in two studies, and show that it yields valid results. It gives insight into the format of experts' knowledge structures; experts turn out to use mainly frame representations.

    • 2006 Cambridge University Press
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    ERWIN W. VAN GEENEN, CILIA L. M. WITTEMAN. 2006. How experts reason: the acquisition of experts' knowledge structures. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 21:68 doi: 10.1017/S0269888906000968
    ERWIN W. VAN GEENEN, CILIA L. M. WITTEMAN. 2006. How experts reason: the acquisition of experts' knowledge structures. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 21:68 doi: 10.1017/S0269888906000968
  • Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return