Search
2021 Volume 1
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Chromosome-level genomes of seeded and seedless date plum based on third-generation DNA sequencing and Hi-C analysis

  • # These authors contributed equally: Weitao Mao, Guoxin Yao

More Information
An Author Correction to this article was published on 19 April 2023, 

http://doi.org/10.48130/FR-2023-0010.

  • Diospyros lotus L. (Date plum) is an important tree species that produces fruit with a high nutritional value. An accurate chromosomal assembly of a species facilitates research on chromosomal evolution and functional gene mapping. In this study, we assembled the first chromosome-level genomes of seeded and seedless D. lotus using Illumina short reads, PacBio long reads, and Hi-C technology. The assembled genomes comprising 15 chromosomes were 617.66 and 647.31 Mb in size, with a scaffold N50 of 40.72 and 42.67 Mb for the seedless and seeded D. lotus, respectively. A BUSCO analysis revealed that the seedless and seeded D. lotus genomes were 91.53% and 91.60% complete, respectively. Additionally, 20,689 (95.4%) and 22,844 (98.5%) protein-coding genes in the seedless and seeded D. lotus genomes were annotated, respectively. Comparisons of the chromosomes between genomes revealed inversions and translocations on chromosome 8 and inversions on chromosome 11. We identified 490 and 424 gene families that expanded in the seedless and seeded D. lotus, respectively. The enriched pathways among these gene families included the estrogen signaling pathway, the MAPK signaling pathway, and biosynthetic pathways for flavonoids, monoterpenoids, and glucosinolates. Moreover, we constructed the first Diospyros genome database (http://www.persimmongenome.cn). On the basis of our data, we developed the first high-quality annotated D. lotus reference genomes, which will be useful for genomic studies on persimmon and for clarifying the molecular mechanisms underlying important traits. Comparisons between the seeded and seedless D. lotus genomes may also elucidate the molecular basis of seedlessness.
  • 加载中
  • Supplemental Fig. S1 Length distribution comparison on total gene, CDS, exon, and intron of annotated gene models of the Seedless Diospyros lotus with other closely related species.
    Supplemental Fig. S2 Length distribution comparison on total gene, CDS, exon, and intron of annotated gene models of the Seeded Diospyros lotus with other closely related species.
    Supplemental Fig. S3 Gene family expansion and contraction analysis of 19 species.Green marks the number of expanding genes, and red marks the number of contracting genes.
    Supplemental Table S1 Seedless Diospyros lotus Hi−C assisted assembly statistics.
    Supplemental Table S2 Seeded Diospyros lotus Hi−C assisted assembly statistics.
    Supplemental Table S3 Mapping rate of Illumina reads to Diospyros lotus genomes assembly.
    Supplemental Table S4 Mapping rate of PacBio reads to Diospyros lotus genome assembly.
    Supplemental Table S5 BUSCO notation assessment of the Diospyros lotus genomes.
    Supplemental Table S6 Statistics of homozygous and heterozygous rates.
    Supplemental Table S7 Classification of repetitive elements in Seedless Diospyros lotus genome.
    Supplemental Table S8 Classification of repetitive elements in Seeded Diospyros lotus genome.
    Supplemental Table S9 Seedless Diospyros lotus genome non-coding RNA annotation statistics.
    Supplemental Table S10 Seeded Diospyros lotus genome non-coding RNA annotation statistics.
    Supplemental Table S11 Gene family clustering of Diospyros lotus and other 17 species.
    Supplemental Table S12 Seedless  Diospyros lotus expansion gene KEGG enriched (p < 0.05).
    Supplemental Table S13 Seedless Diospyros lotus expansion gene GO enriched (p < 0.05).
    Supplemental Table S14 Seedless Diospyros lotus Contraction gene KEGG enriched (p < 0.05).
    Supplemental Table S15 Seedless Diospyros lotus Contraction gene GO enrichedv (p < 0.05).
    Supplemental Table S16 Seeded Diospyros lotus expansion gene KEGG enriched (p < 0.05).
    Supplemental Table S17 Seeded Diospyros lotus expansion gene GO enriched (p < 0.05).
    Supplemental Table S18 Seeded Diospyros lotus Contraction gene KEGG enriched (p < 0.05).
    Supplemental Table S19 Seeded Diospyros lotus Contraction gene GO enriched (p < 0.05).
  • [1]

    Christophel D. 1982. Earliest floral evidence for the Ebenaceae in Australia. Nature 296:439−41

    doi: 10.1038/296439a0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Duangjai S, Wallnöfer B, Samuel R, Munzinger J, Chase MW. 2006. Generic delimitation and relationships in Ebenaceae sensu lato: evidence from six plastid DNA regions. American Journal of Botany 93:1808−27

    doi: 10.3732/ajb.93.12.1808

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Turner B, Munzinger J, Duangjai S, Temsch EM, Stockenhuber R, et al. 2013. Molecular phylogenetics of New Caledonian Diospyros (Ebenaceae) using plastid and nuclear markers. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 69:740−63

    doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.07.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Loizzo MR, Said A, Tundis R, Hawas UW, Rashed K, et al. 2009. Antioxidant and Antiproliferative Activity of Diospyros lotus L. Extract and Isolated Compounds. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 64:264

    doi: 10.1007/s11130-009-0133-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Rauf A, Uddin G, Siddiqui BS, Muhammad N, Khan H. 2014. Antipyretic and antinociceptive activity of Diospyros lotus L. in animals. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 4:S382−S386

    doi: 10.12980/APJTB.4.2014C1020

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Yang Y, Yang T, Jing Z. 2015. Genetic diversity and taxonomic studies of date plum (Diospyros lotus L.) using morphological traits and SCoT markers. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 61:253−59

    doi: 10.1016/j.bse.2015.06.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Cho BO, Yin HH, Park SH, Byun EB, Ha HY, et al. 2016. Anti-inflammatory activity of myricetin from Diospyros lotus through suppression of NF-κB and STAT1 activation and Nrf2-mediated HO-1 induction in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 80:1520−30

    doi: 10.1080/09168451.2016.1171697

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Zhou R, Zhang X, Hu H, Li G, Song R. 2016. Plant regeneration from leaves of seedless date plum (Diospyros lotus L.). Northern Horticulture 40(22):104−6

    doi: 10.11937/bfyy.201622026

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Ali S, Khan AS, Raza SA, Naveed R, Rehman R. 2013. Innovative breeding methods to develop seedless citrus cultivars. International Journal of Biosciences 3:191−201

    doi: 10.12692/ijb/3.8.191-201

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Mesejo C, Martínez-Fuentes A, Reig C, Rivas F, Agustí M. 2006. The inhibitory effect of CuSO4 on Citrus pollen germination and pollen tube growth and its application for the production of seedless fruit. Plant Science 170:37−43

    doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2005.07.023

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Sugiyama K, Morishita M. 2000. Production of seedless watermelon using soft-X-irradiated pollen. Scientia Horticulturae 84:255−64

    doi: 10.1016/S0304-4238(99)00104-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Mesejo C, Reig C, Martínez-Fuentes A, Agustí M. 2010. Parthenocarpic fruit production in loquat (Eriobotrya japonica Lindl.) by using gibberellic acid. Scientia Horticulturae 126:37−41

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2010.06.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Doyle JJ, Doyle JL. 1986. A rapid DNA isolation procedure for small quantities of fresh leaf tissues. Phytochemical Bulletin 19:11−15

    Google Scholar

    [14]

    Koren S, Walenz PB, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, et al. 2017. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Research 27:722−36

    doi: 10.1101/gr.215087.116

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Chin CS, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, et al. 2013. Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nature Methods 10:563−69

    doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2474

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, et al. 2014. Pilon: An integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PloS One 9:e112963

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Roach MJ, Schmidt SA, Borneman AR. 2018. Purge Haplotigs: Allelic contig reassignment for third-gen diploid genome assemblies. BMC Bioinformatics 19:460

    doi: 10.1186/s12859-018-2485-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Marçais G, Kingsford C. 2011. A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers. Bioinformatics 27:764−70

    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nature Methods 9:357−59

    doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Wingett S, Ewels P, Furlan-Magaril M, Nagano T, Schoenfelder S, et al. 2015. HiCUP: Pipeline for mapping and processing Hi-C data. F1000Research 4:1310

    doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7334.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Dudchenko O, Batra SS, Omer AD, Nyquist SK, Hoeger M, et al. 2017. De novo assembly of the Aedes aegypti genome using Hi-C yields chromosome-length scaffolds. Science 356:92−95

    doi: 10.1126/science.aal3327

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754−60

    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Chaisson MJ, Tesler G. 2012. Mapping single molecule sequencing reads using Basic Local Alignment with Successive Refinement (BLASR): Theory and Application. BMC Bioinformatics 13:238

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-238

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Simão F, Waterhouse R, Ioannidis P, Kriventseva EV, Zdobnov EM. 2015. BUSCO: Assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics 31:3210−12

    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Ou S, Jiang N. 2017. LTR_retriever: A highly accurate and sensitive program for identification of long terminal repeat retrotransposons. Plant Physiology 176:1410−22

    doi: 10.1104/pp.17.01310

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, et al. 2009. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25:2078−79

    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Lam HYK, Clark MJ, Chen R, Chen R, Natsoulis G, et al. 2012. Performance comparison of whole-genome sequencing platforms. Nature Biotechnology 30:78−82

    doi: 10.1038/nbt.2065

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, et al. 2010. The genome analysis toolkit: A mapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Research 20:1297−303

    doi: 10.1101/gr.107524.110

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Tarailo-Graovac M, Chen N. 2009. Using RepeatMasker to identify repetitive elements in genomic sequences. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics 25:4.10.1−4.10.14

    doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0410s25

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Benson G. 1999. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Research 27:573−80

    doi: 10.1093/nar/27.2.573

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Stanke M, Keller O, Gunduz I, Hayes A, Waack S, et al. 2006. AUGUSTUS: ab initio prediction of alternative transcripts. Nucleic Acids Research 34:W435−W439

    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl200

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Gertz EM, Yu YK, Agarwala R, Schäffer AA, Altschul SF. 2006. Composition-based statistics and translated nucleotide searches: Improving the TBLASTN module of BLAST. BMC Biology 4:41

    doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-4-41

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Trapnell C, Pachter L, Salzberg SL. 2009. TopHat: discovering splice junctions with RNA-Seq. Bioinformatics 25:1105−11

    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp120

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Trapnell C, Roberts A, Goff L, Pertea G, Kim D, et al. 2012. Differential gene and transcript expression analysis of RNA-Seq experiments with TopHat and Cufflinks. Nature Protocols 7:562−78

    doi: 10.1038/nprot.2012.016

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Campbell MS, Holt C, Moore B, Yandell M. 2014. Genome annotation and curation using MAKER and MAKER-P. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics 48:4.11.1−4.11.39

    doi: 10.1002/0471250953.bi0411s48

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Lowe TM, Eddy SR. 1997. tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Research 25:955−64

    doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.955

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Kalvari I, Nawrocki EP, Argasinska J, Quinones-Olvera N, Finn RD, et al. 2018. Non-coding RNA analysis using the Rfam database. Current Protocols in Bioinformatics 62:e51

    doi: 10.1002/cpbi.51

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Nawrocki EP, Kolbe DL, Eddy SR. 2009. Infernal 1.0: inference of RNA alignments. Bioinformatics 25:1335−37

    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp157

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Wang Y, Tang H, DeBarry J, Tan X, Li J, et al. 2012. MCScanX: a toolkit for detection and evolutionary analysis of gene synteny and collinearity. Nucleic Acids Research 40:e49

    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1293

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local aligment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215:403−10

    doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Emms DM, Kelly S. 2015. OrthoFinder: solving fundamental biases in whole genome comparisons dramatically improves orthogroup inference accuracy. Genome Biology 16:157

    doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0721-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 32:1792−97

    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Guindon S, Dufayard JF, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, et al. 2010. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic Biology 59:307−21

    doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syq010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Yang Z. 2007. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24:1586−91

    doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm088

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    De Bie T, Cristianini N, Demuth JP, Hahn MW. 2006. CAFE: a computational tool for the study of gene family evolution. Bioinformatics 22:1269−71

    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl097

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Martin G, Carreel F, Coriton O, Hervouet C, Cardi C, et al. 2017. Evolution of the banana genome (Musa acuminata) is impacted by large chromosomal translocations. Molecular Biology and Evolution 34:2140−52

    doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx164

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Copley RR, Letunic I, Bork P. 2002. Genome and protein evolution in eukaryotes. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 6:39−45

    doi: 10.1016/S1367-5931(01)00278-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Danquah A, de Zelicourt A, Colcombet J, Hirt H. 2014. The role of ABA and MAPK signaling pathways in plant abiotic stress responses. Biotechnology Advances 32:40−52

    doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.09.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Roudier F, Gissot L, Beaudoin F, Haslam R, Michaelson L, et al. 2010. Very-long-chain fatty acids are involved in polar auxin transport and developmental patterning in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 22:364−75

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.109.071209

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Duangjai S, Samuel R, Munzinger J, Forest F, Wallnöfer B, et al. 2009. A multi-locus plastid phylogenetic analysis of the pantropical genus Diospyros (Ebenaceae), with an emphasis on the radiation and biogeographic origins of the New Caledonian endemic species. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 52:602−20

    doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2009.04.021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Rauf A, Uddin G, Patel S, Khan A, Halim SA, et al. 2017. Diospyros, an under-utilized, multi-purpose plant genus: A review. Biomedicine Pharmacotherapy 91:714−30

    doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.05.012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Mao W, Yao G, Wang S, Zhou L, Chen G, et al. 2021. Chromosome-level genomes of seeded and seedless date plum based on third-generation DNA sequencing and Hi-C analysis. Forestry Research 1:9 doi: 10.48130/FR-2021-0009
    Mao W, Yao G, Wang S, Zhou L, Chen G, et al. 2021. Chromosome-level genomes of seeded and seedless date plum based on third-generation DNA sequencing and Hi-C analysis. Forestry Research 1:9 doi: 10.48130/FR-2021-0009

Figures(7)  /  Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(6166) PDF downloads(655)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Chromosome-level genomes of seeded and seedless date plum based on third-generation DNA sequencing and Hi-C analysis

Forestry Research  1 Article number: 9  (2021)  |  Cite this article
An Author Correction to this article was published on 19 April 2023, 

http://doi.org/10.48130/FR-2023-0010.

Abstract: Diospyros lotus L. (Date plum) is an important tree species that produces fruit with a high nutritional value. An accurate chromosomal assembly of a species facilitates research on chromosomal evolution and functional gene mapping. In this study, we assembled the first chromosome-level genomes of seeded and seedless D. lotus using Illumina short reads, PacBio long reads, and Hi-C technology. The assembled genomes comprising 15 chromosomes were 617.66 and 647.31 Mb in size, with a scaffold N50 of 40.72 and 42.67 Mb for the seedless and seeded D. lotus, respectively. A BUSCO analysis revealed that the seedless and seeded D. lotus genomes were 91.53% and 91.60% complete, respectively. Additionally, 20,689 (95.4%) and 22,844 (98.5%) protein-coding genes in the seedless and seeded D. lotus genomes were annotated, respectively. Comparisons of the chromosomes between genomes revealed inversions and translocations on chromosome 8 and inversions on chromosome 11. We identified 490 and 424 gene families that expanded in the seedless and seeded D. lotus, respectively. The enriched pathways among these gene families included the estrogen signaling pathway, the MAPK signaling pathway, and biosynthetic pathways for flavonoids, monoterpenoids, and glucosinolates. Moreover, we constructed the first Diospyros genome database (http://www.persimmongenome.cn). On the basis of our data, we developed the first high-quality annotated D. lotus reference genomes, which will be useful for genomic studies on persimmon and for clarifying the molecular mechanisms underlying important traits. Comparisons between the seeded and seedless D. lotus genomes may also elucidate the molecular basis of seedlessness.

    • Date plum (Diospyros lotus L.), which belongs to the genus Diospyros in the family Ebenaceae, is an important deciduous fruit tree species that grows in Asia, where it is cultivated for its edible fruit. The Diospyros genus, within the Ebenaceae (Ericales), contains more than 700 species, including the economically important persimmons (D. kaki, D. virginiana, and D. lotus) and ebony (D. ebenum)[13]. The fruit of D. lotus is globe shaped and yellow or bluish-black when mature[4,5]. Able to be grown at 2,200 m above sea level, D. lotus is the most cold-tolerant Diospyros species in China. It is used as a rootstock because of its high grafting capability and for developing new varieties because of its strong tolerance to drought and cold[6]. Additionally, D. lotus is used in drug research. The D. lotus fruit is used as a sedative, astringent, food and laxative, and has antiseptic, antidiabetic, antitumor, and antipyretic properties. It is also useful for treating constipation and diarrhea, dry coughs and hypertension[7].

      There are seeded and seedless D. lotus varieties, and the seedless type has a high nutritional value. The edible parts are ideal raw materials for research and the development of foods, drinks and health-care products[8]. Many high-quality fruits are unacceptable for consumers because they have too many seeds or their seeds are too large[9]. The production of seedless fruit is also attractive because it avoids the possibility of any undesirable pollination. Seedless fruit is an important and peculiar horticultural trait that has been selected for and retained during long-term cultivation. The seedless trait of fruit is very complex, and is not only affected by internal genetic factors in certain tree species and varieties, but also by external factors. Seedless fruit can be obtained using specific treatments. The addition of a certain CuSO4·5H2O concentration while cross-pollinating during the citrus flowering period significantly reduces the numbers of seeds in the fruit without affecting yield[10]. Similarly, watermelon fruit that results from pollination with pollen irradiated with soft-X-ray contains only empty seed, although the fruit develops to a normal size[11]. Additionally, gibberellic acid treatments induce parthenocarpy in Algerie loquat[12].

      To date, most of the research on the mechanisms underlying seedlessness has been at the cellular level, and the application of gene sequencing technology has revealed that the expression of certain genes causes fruit to be seedless. To the best of our knowledge, there are no published reports on the seedless trait of D. lotus fruit. Therefore, the aim of this study was to provide new insights into the production of seedless D. lotus fruit through genome sequencing and a comparative analysis of seeded and seedless D. lotus varieties. The results will also be useful for breeding D. lotus varieties with desirable characteristics.

    • Two D. lotus varieties (Fig. 1), seedless D. lotus (W01) and seeded D. lotus (Yz01), were grown in Taoyuan Village, Zhenluoying Town, Pinggu District, Beijing, China. Fresh, healthy leaves were collected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Genomic DNA extracted from the samples using the cetyltrimethylammonium bromide method[13] was used for sequencing. To obtain sufficient high-quality DNA for the PacBio Sequel II platform (Pacific Biosciences of California Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA), the concentration and purity of the extracted DNA were determined using a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and a Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Moreover, the integrity of the DNA was checked by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. The extracted DNA was sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and PacBio Sequel II platforms (Pacific Biosciences of California Inc., Menlo Park, CA, USA). The short reads generated from the Illumina platform were used to estimate the genome size, heterozygosity, and repeat content, whereas the long reads from the PacBio platform were used for assembling genomes. Briefly, qualified DNA samples were randomly fragmented into 350 base pair (bp) segments using ultrasonic crushing apparatus, after which they were used for the end repair, poly (A) addition, barcode indexing, purification, and PCR amplification steps. Regarding the Illumina NovaSeq sequencing analysis, we constructed a paired-end library with 150 bp sequences using the manufacturer-recommended method. After filtering, 80.99 Gb (119.53-fold genome sequence coverage) and 79.21 Gb (114.98-fold genome sequence coverage) of clean data were generated for the seedless and seeded D. lotus, respectively. For the PacBio sequencing, SMRTbell libraries (approximately 20 kb) were obtained according to the PacBio protocol. After removing adapters and correcting and trimming the data, 92.08 Gb (103.29-fold genome sequence coverage) and 133.51 Gb (166.98-fold genome sequence coverage) of sequence data were generated for the seedless and seeded D. lotus, respectively.

      Figure 1. 

      Fruit shapes and seed sizes of the seeded and seedless Diospyros lotus. (a) Seeded (Yz01); (b) Seedless (W01).

    • Total RNA was prepared from the two D. lotus varieties stems, fruits and leaves using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, California, USA). A NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Waltham, MA, USA) and an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, USA) were applied to check RNA quality. Equal amounts of RNA from each tissue were used for cDNA library construction. Approximately 4.17 Gb and 4.15 Gb of transcript data were produced for seedless and seeded D. lotus from the Illumina HiSeq X Ten sequencing platform and processed using Trimmomatic (version 0.36) with the default parameters.

    • Genomes were assembled using Canu (version 1.5)[14], with the following parameters: maxThreads = 200, minReadLength = 1,000, corOut Coverage = 40, correctedErrorRate = 0.045, minOverlapLength = 500, rawErrorRate = 0.3, and corMin Coverage = 4. To increase the accuracy of the sequencing data, the genomes were assembled using the error correction, trimming, and assembly steps of Canu. The sequences were polished in two rounds. Specifically, the PacBio long-read sequence data were polished with Arrow[15], after which the Illumina sequence data were polished using Pilon (version 1.22)[16]. Purge Haplotigs[17] was used to remove genomic redundancies after the initial assembly and correction.

    • We used Illumina short reads and a k-mer-based method[18] to estimate the size, heterozygosity, and repeat content of the seedless and seeded D. lotus genomes, using a software package (GCE-1.0.2, https://github.com/fanagislab/GCE). The k-mer frequency (k = 17) was determined using Jellyfish software, and the frequency distribution derived from the sequencing reads was plotted.

    • Fresh young D. lotus leaves were treated with paraformaldehyde. Chromatin was digested with the restriction enzyme MboI and ligated in situ after a biotinylation step. The 5′ overhangs were labeled with a biotinylated tag and repaired. Following the ligation, the DNA was extracted and sheared, after which fragments between 300 and 500 bp long were selected. The biotin-containing fragments were captured to construct a library, which was then sequenced with the Illumina system. The Hi-C library sequencing for the seedless and seeded D. lotus resulted in 86.96 Gb and 107.87 Gb data, respectively (Table 1). The two groups of sequencing reads were aligned to the previously assembled genomes using Bowtie2[19]. The Hi-C data were identified and aligned, and the repeated reads were removed. The data were filtered and evaluated in tandem using HiCUP[20]. On the basis of cis interactions, rather than trans interactions, contigs or scaffolds were divided, anchored, sequenced, directed and incorporated to obtain chromosome-level genomes using 3D-DNA[21].

      Table 1.  Summary of the sequencing data used for assembling the Diospyros lotus genomes.

      Library typeSeedless Diospyros lotus (W01)Seeded Diospyros lotus (Yz01)
      Library size (bp)Clean data (Gb)Coverage (×)Library size (bp)Clean data (Gb)Coverage (×)
      Illumina35080.99 119.5335079.21114.98
      Pacbio20,00092.1103.2920,000133.51166.98
      Hi-C35086.96 350107.87
    • To evaluate the quality of the assembled genomes, the Illumina short reads were mapped to the genomes using the BWA software[22] and the PacBio long reads were mapped using BLASR[23]. The completeness of the assembled genomes was determined by BUSCO analyses[24] using the actinopterygii_odb9 dataset. Long terminal repeat (LTR) sequences were used to evaluate genomic integrity, which was expressed as the LTR assembly index (LAI), using the LTR_finder and LTR_retriever programs[25]. Illumina short reads were aligned to the genome using SAMtools[26], whereas Picard tools[27] were used to detect mutations and GATK[28] was used to count the homozygous and heterozygous SNPs and InDels. The results are herein presented as circular genomic maps.

    • Repetitive sequences, including transposable elements (TEs) and tandem repeats, were analyzed. More specifically, the repeated sequences in the D. lotus genomes were annotated using homology-based and ab initio prediction methods. RepeatMasker and Repeat Protein Mask (version 4.0.5)[29] were used to retrieve data from the RepBase database (http://www.girinst.org/repbase). Tandem Repeats Finder[30] and LTR_finder were used to make ab initio predictions.

      The protein-coding genes were annotated using a combination of homology-based, ab initio, and transcriptome-based predictions. Augustus (version 3.0.2)[31] was used to predict ab initio coding genes. For the homology-based method, protein sequences from related plants, including Olea europaea, Capsicum annuum, Daucus carota, Solanum pennellii, Arabidopsis thaliana, Lactuca sativa, and Solanum tuberosum, were downloaded from public databases and aligned against the D. lotus genomes using TBLASTN (E-value < 1e-5)[32]. The sequences derived from RNA-seq data were compared with the assembled D. lotus genomes to identify potential exon regions using TopHat (version 2.0.8)[33] and Cufflinks (version 2.1.1)[34]. We integrated all predicted genes using MAKER software[35]. The following databases were screened for homologous sequences: NCBI non-redundant protein (NR), Gene Ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), Eukaryotic Orthologous Groups (KOG), SwissProt, TrEMBL, InterProScan, and Pfam.

      The default parameters of tRNAscan-SE[36] were used to predict transfer RNA (tRNA) genes. Because ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs) are highly conserved, the rRNA sequences of related species were selected as reference sequences and used to search for rRNA sequences in the genomes via a BLASTN alignment (E-value < 1e-5). The microRNA (miRNA) and small nuclear RNA (snRNA) fragments were identified by searching the Rfam database (version 11.0)[37] using INFERNAL (version 1.1)[38].

    • The evolution of the seedless and seeded D. lotus chromosomes as well as gene synteny were investigated using MCScan[39]. A total of 17,162 gene pairs were detected in the comparisons of the seedless and seeded D. lotus genomes. The aligned syntenic chromosomes were visualized.

    • To more thoroughly examine the phylogenetic relationships of D. lotus and the evolution of its gene families, we clustered gene sequences from 17 related plant species and performed a phylogenetic analysis based on the protein-coding genes from the seedless and seeded D. lotus and the 17 other species. We extracted and downloaded the protein sequences encoded by single-copy genes from the NCBI database for the following 17 species: Malus domestica, Citrus reticulata, Juglans regia, Solanum lycopersicum, Diospyros oleifera Cheng, Rhododendron delavayi, Camellia sinensis, Coffea canephora, Daucus carota, Coriandrum sativum, Cucurbita pepo, Vitis vinifera, Eriobotrya japonica, Sorghum bicolor, Arabidopsis thaliana, Oryza sativa subsp. japonica, and Beta vulgaris. Analyses were conducted using BLASTP (E-value < 1e-5)[40] and OrthoFinder (version 2.27)[41], with an inflation parameter of 1.5. To reveal the phylogenetic relationships among D. lotus and the other species, the protein sequences encoded by single-copy orthologous genes were aligned using MUSCLE (version 3.8.31)[42]. These phylogenetic analyses were performed according to the maximum-likelihood method of PhyML (version 3.0)[43]. Using the molecular clock data from the TimeTree database, the divergence times were determined with the approximate likelihood calculation method of PAML (version 4.8)[44]. We compared the cluster size differences between the ancestors and each species and analyzed the expansion and contraction of the gene families using CAFE (version 2.1)[45].

    • The Diospyros Genome Database was set up using Tomcat and MySQL. The backend was designed and implemented using the SpringBoot + MyBatis framework, with CentOS as the server. Data were visualized using an open source ECharts package. We collected genomic data for Diospyros oleifera Cheng, Diospyros lotus_ Kunsenshi-Male, seedless Diospyros lotus and seeded Diospyros lotus.

    • The sequencing datasets and genome assemblies have been deposited in public repositories. The Illumina genome sequencing data were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the accession numbers SRR12450967 (Seedless) and SRR12450964 (Seeded). The PacBio genome sequencing data were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the accession numbers SRR12450966 (Seedless) and SRR12450963 (Seeded). The Hi-C sequencing data were deposited in the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under the accession numbers SRR12450965 (Seedless) and SRR12450962 (Seeded). The final chromosome assemblies were deposited in the NCBI GenBank database under accession numbers JACNMG000000000 (Seedless) and JACRTX000000000 (Seeded). Raw sequencing data for RNA-Seq used for annotation have been deposited in the NCBI under the SRA accession number SRR14028490 (Seeded) and SRR14026913 (Seedless).

    • On the basis of the k-mer analysis (k-mer = 17), the seedless D. lotus genome size was 682 Mb, with a heterozygosity of 1.0% and a repeat content of 57.15%, whereas the seeded D. lotus genome size was 616 Mb, with a heterozygosity of 1.26% and a repeat content of 54.92%. A total of 92.08 Gb (103.29-fold genome sequence coverage) and 133.51 Gb (166.98-fold genome sequence coverage) of PacBio long reads, as well as 80.99 Gb (119.53-fold genome sequence coverage) and 79.21 Gb (114.98-fold genome sequence coverage) of Illumina clean data, were generated for the seedless and seeded D. lotus, respectively (Table 1). The total length of the assembled reads for the seedless D. lotus genome was 617.66 Mb, which included 706 contigs. The contig N50 was 3.01 Mb and the longest contig was 16.26 Mb. The total length of the assembled reads for the seeded D. lotus genome was 647.31 Mb, which included 743 contigs. The contig N50 was 2.46 Mb and the longest contig was 14.82 Mb (Table 2). The size difference between the final genomes and the genome survey sequences may have been because of the heterozygosity and repetitive sequence of the D. lotus genomes. On the basis of the Hi-C assisted assembly, 142 contigs were successfully clustered into 15 chromosomes in the seedless D. lotus genome, and the scaffold N50 reached 40.72 Mb (Supplemental Table S1), whereas 41 contigs were successfully clustered into 15 chromosomes in the seeded D. lotus genome, and the scaffold N50 reached 42.67 Mb (Supplemental Table S2). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of chromosome-level D. lotus genomes (Fig. 2).

      Table 2.  Summary of the assembled seedless and seeded Diospyros lotus genomes.

      ParameterSeedless Diospyros lotus (W01)Seeded Diospyros lotus (Yz01)
      Contig length (bp)Contig numberContig length (bp)Contig number
      N90561,232228537,928279
      N801,144,3541511,078,450194
      N701,625,0121061,450,541143
      N602,258,638732,059,392106
      N503,006,748492,463,96077
      Total length617,662,490647,313,630
      Number (≥ 100 bp)706743
      Number (≥ 2 kb)691734
      Max length16,262,24114,842,567

      Figure 2. 

      Hi-C interaction heat maps for Diospyros lotus genomes presenting the interactions among 15 chromosomes. (a) Seeded (Yz01); (b) Seedless (W01).

    • The Illumina short-read mapping rates were 97.74% and 98.24% for the seedless and seeded D. lotus genomes, respectively (Supplemental Table S3). The PacBio long-read mapping rates were 90.90% and 94.89% for the seedless and seeded D. lotus genomes, respectively (Supplemental Table S4). The BUSCO analysis revealed that the seedless and seeded D. lotus genomes were 91.53% and 91.60% complete, respectively (Supplemental Table S5). The results of the analysis of the homozygosity and heterozygosity of the SNPs and InDels are presented in Supplemental Table S4. The LAI is a newly developed reference-free genome metric for evaluating genome assembly continuity using LTR retrotransposons. The LAI values for our assembled seedless D. lotus genome (LAI = 15.22) and seeded D. lotus genome (LAI = 11.98) were relatively high, exceeding the threshold for reference genome assemblies. Circular maps of the seedless and seeded D. lotus genomes are presented in Fig. 3.

      Figure 3. 

      Circular genomic maps for Diospyros lotus. (a) Seeded (Yz01); (b) Seedless (W01). A. GC content distribution; B. Gene density distribution; C. Repeats density distribution; D. LTR-Copia density distribution; E. LTR-Gypsy density distribution; F. DNA transposon density distribution.

    • A genomic analysis revealed that 69.56% of the seedless D. lotus genome consisted of repetitive sequences, of which TEs accounted for 68.76%. The most frequently detected TEs in the seedless D. lotus genome were LTR retrotransposons (55.17%), followed by DNA TEs (10.20%) (Supplemental Table S7). In contrast, 73.81% of the seeded D. lotus genome consisted of repetitive sequences, of which TEs accounted for 72.87%. The most frequently detected TEs in the seeded D. lotus genome were LTR retrotransposons (59.37%), followed by DNA TEs (11.57%) (Supplemental Table S8).

    • Homology-based, transcriptome-based, and ab initio gene predictions were used to generate gene models, which were combined. After eliminating sequence redundancies with MAKER, 21,684 and 23,193 protein-coding genes wereidentified in the seedless and seeded D. lotus genomes, respectively.The screening of the NR, GO, KEGG, KOG, SwissProt, TrEMBL, InterProScan, and Pfam databases for homologous sequences indicated that the seedless and seeded D. lotus genomes respectively contained 20,689 (95.41%) and 22,844 (98.50%) protein-coding genes listed in at least one public database (Table 3). The number of genes, gene length distribution, coding sequence length distribution, exon length distribution, and intron length distribution for the D. lotus genomes were similar to the corresponding data for the other analyzed species (Supplemental Fig. S1, S2).

      Table 3.  General statistics for the functional annotations of the genes in the seedless and seeded Diospyros lotus genomes.

      TypeSeedless Diospyros lotus (W01)Seeded Diospyros lotus (Yz01)
      NumberPercent (%)NumberPercent (%)
      Total21,68423,193
      Annotated20,68995.4122,84498.5
      InterPro17,47380.5820,03786.39
      GO12,16156.0814,06660.65
      KEGG ALL20,54794.7622,75098.09
      KEGG KO8,43538.909,81242.31
      Swissprot15,05769.4416,89672.85
      TrEMBL20,58794.9422,79098.26
      TF1,5607.191,5726.78
      Pfam17,06478.6919,70984.98
      NR20,60795.0322,79498.28
      KOG17,99082.9620,20887.13
      Unannotated9954.593491.50
    • We identified snRNA, miRNA, and rRNA genes in the seedless and seeded D. lotus genomes based on a BLASTN search of the Rfam database (E-value < 1e-5), whereas we used tRNAscan-SE and RNAmmer to predict the tRNAs and rRNAs. Finally, 146 miRNAs, 496 tRNAs, 719 rRNAs, and 792 snRNAs were identified in seedless, with average lengths of 129, 75, 220, and 111 bp, respectively (Supplemental Table S9). Additionally, 219 miRNAs, 826 tRNAs, 2,386 rRNAs, and 1,371 snRNAs were identified in seeded, with average lengths of 127, 75, 376, and 110 bp, respectively (Supplemental Table S10).

    • We analyzed the synteny between the seedless and seeded D. lotus genomes, and the results are presented in Fig. 4b. Although the degree of synteny between the two genomes was relatively high, chromosome 8 included inversions and translocations and chromosome 11 contained inversions (Fig. 4a). These chromosomal variations may be related to differences in seedless traits, as has been reported for banana and citrus species[9,46].

      Figure 4. 

      Chromosomal synteny between seedless and seeded Diospyros lotus. (a) Inter-genomic comparison. (b) Chromosomal maps of seedless and seeded Diospyros lotus.

    • We selected genome sequences of representative plant species for a comparative genomic analysis of seedless and seeded D. lotus to reveal the genome evolution and divergence time of D. lotus. Seedless and seeded D. lotus and other 17 species were analysed together (Supplemental Table S11). A total of 8,998 gene families were shared by these five species, whereas 608 and 502 gene families were unique to seedless and seeded D. lotus, respectively (Fig. 5). There were significantly more unique gene families in seedless D. lotus than in seeded D. lotus. The phylogenetic analysis indicated that D. lotus is most closely related to D. oleifera, with an estimated divergence time of 23.5 million years. Seedless and seeded D. lotus were estimated to have diverged 5.9 million years ago (Fig. 6).

      Figure 5. 

      Venn diagram presenting the number of shared and unique protein-coding genes among seedless and seeded Diospyros lotus, Malus domestica, Citrus reticulata, and Juglans regia revealed by an orthology analysis.

      Figure 6. 

      Phylogenetic tree of seedless and seeded Diospyros lotus and 17 other species constructed using the maximum-likelihood method. Estimated species divergence times (million years ago) and 95% confidence intervals are labeled at each branch site. Blue numbers on branches indicate the estimated divergence times. Red dots indicate the divergence times estimated based on fossil evidence.

    • The expansion and contraction of gene families areimportant processes during evolution[47]. Our analysis indicated that 490 gene families expanded in seedless (Supplemental Fig. S3). The enriched KEGG pathways among these families included estrogen signaling pathway, MAPK signaling pathway, antigen processing and presentation, longevity regulating pathway–multiple species, flavonoid biosynthesis, and metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome P450 (Supplemental Table S12). The enriched GO terms included cargo receptor activity;electron transporter, transferring electrons within the cyclic electron transport pathway ofphotosynthesis activity; photosynthetic electron transport in photosystem II; and scavenger receptor activity (Supplemental Table S13). Our results indicated that 1,497 gene families contracted in seedless. Fatty acid elongation and amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism were two of the enriched KEGG pathways among these gene families (Supplemental Table S14). The most enriched GO term was catalytic activity (Supplemental Table S15). In contrast, our analyses indicated that 424 gene families expanded in seeded. The functional annotation of these genes revealed monoterpenoid biosynthesis, glucosinolate biosynthesis and alpha-linolenic acid metabolism were among the enriched KEGG pathways (Supplemental Table S16). Moreover, the most enriched GO terms were oxidation-reduction process, ionotropic glutamate receptor activity, extracellular ligand-gated ion channel activity and glutamate receptor activity (Supplemental Table S17). Several KEGG pathways were enriched among the 1,951 gene families predicted to have contracted in seeded, including one carbon pool by folate, nitrogen metabolism and anthocyanin biosynthesis (Supplemental Table S18), whereas the enriched GO terms were catalytic activity, serine-type endopeptidase activity and copper ion binding (Supplemental Table S19).

      Seedlessness may be associated with genes related to pollen and pollination, fertilization and various hormone regulators. The expanded and contracted seedless D. lotus gene families included those associated with fatty acid elongation and the MAPK signaling pathway, which are important for regulating plant hormones. Lipids are part of hormone precursors, whereas auxin, ethylene and abscisic acid are correlated with the MAPK signaling pathway[48,49]. Therefore, analyses of the genes enriched in these pathways may provide new insights into the formation of seedless fruits.

    • Diospyros, which is the largest genus in the family Ebenaceae, comprises more than 500 economically valuable species widely distributed in the tropics and subtropics, including approximately 300 species in the Asia–Pacific region, 98 species in Madagascar and the Comoros, 94 species in mainland Africa, about 100 species in the Americas, 15 species in Australia, and 31 species in New Caledonia[50,51]. Many persimmon species have been studied, but relatively little research has focused on the genome. The recent increase in genome resources has produced a wealth of data for in-depth analyses of the biology and evolution of Diospyros plants, but obtaining and using these resources remains difficult. Thus, we developed the Diospyros Genome Database (http://www.persimmongenome.cn) as the first comprehensive database for Diospyros plant genomes. This database provides tools for browsing genomes (JBrowse), searching sequence databases (BLAST), and designing primers. To better serve the research community, wecontinue to update our database and develop new tools (Fig. 7).

      Figure 7. 

      The user interface of Diospyros Genome Database for browsing genomes, searching for homologous sequences and designing primers.

    • We applied Illumina and PacBio sequencing platforms and Hi-C technology to assemble chromosome-level reference genomes for seeded and seedless D. lotus. The resulting seedless and seeded D. lotus genomes comprised 617.66 and 647.31 Mb, respectively. The assembled seeded genome included 23,193 protein-coding genes, 219 miRNAs, 826 tRNAs, 2,386 rRNAs, 1,371 snRNAs, 424 expanded gene families, and 1,951 contracted gene families. The assembled seedless genome included 21,684 protein-coding genes, 146 miRNAs, 496 tRNAs, 719 rRNAs, 792 snRNAs, 490 expanded gene families, and 1,497 contracted gene families. We predicted that D. lotus and D. oleifera diverged approximately 23.5 million years ago, whereas seeded and seedless D. lotus diverged about 5.9 million years ago. The high-quality D. lotus genomes assembled in this study will be useful for future research on important agronomic traits among Diospyros species. Furthermore, comparisons between seeded and seedless D. lotus genomes will enable researchers to clarify the mechanisms underlying seedlessness.

      • This work was financially supported by the Presidential Foundation of Beijing Academy of Forestry and Pomology Sciences (grant no. LGY201901) and the Special Fund for the Construction of Scientific and Technological Innovation Capability (KJCX20200114).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • # These authors contributed equally: Weitao Mao, Guoxin Yao

      • Copyright: © 2023 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (7)  Table (3) References (51)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Mao W, Yao G, Wang S, Zhou L, Chen G, et al. 2021. Chromosome-level genomes of seeded and seedless date plum based on third-generation DNA sequencing and Hi-C analysis. Forestry Research 1:9 doi: 10.48130/FR-2021-0009
    Mao W, Yao G, Wang S, Zhou L, Chen G, et al. 2021. Chromosome-level genomes of seeded and seedless date plum based on third-generation DNA sequencing and Hi-C analysis. Forestry Research 1:9 doi: 10.48130/FR-2021-0009

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return