Search
2023 Volume 3
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Identification of WUSCHEL-related homeobox (WOX) gene family members and determination of their expression profiles during somatic embryogenesis in Phoebe bournei

More Information
  • WUSCHEL-related homeobox (WOX) transcription factor (TF)-encoding genes play crucial roles during embryo development. The function of WOX genes in embryonic development has been thoroughly studied in Arabidopsis thaliana, but little is known about their function in woody species, especially Phoebe bournei, an endemic and endangered species in China. In the present study, a total of 15 WOX genes were identified in P. bournei, and phylogenetic analysis resulted in their assignment to three typical clades: an ancient clade, an intermediate clade, and a modern/WUS clade. The gene structure and sequence characteristics and the physicochemical properties of WOX proteins were also analyzed. Promoter prediction indicated that WOX genes are likely involved in plant growth and development and hormone responses. Subsequently, we evaluated the expression patterns of WOX genes in response to auxin (IAA), abscisic acid (ABA), and methyl jasmonate (MeJA) treatments. According to tissue-specific expression patterns, we screened nine WOX genes that were present in embryonic calli and that might participate in the somatic embryogenesis (SE) of P. bournei. Furthermore, the expression profiles of these nine WOX genes during three phases of embryogenic calli development and three phases of somatic embryo development, namely, spheroid embryogenesis, immature cotyledon-producing embryogenesis and mature cotyledon-producing embryogenesis, were monitored. Overall, we systematically analyzed the expression patterns of WOX genes in P. bournei during SE, the information of which provides a basis for further elucidating the molecular mechanism through which WOX TFs function in P. bournei embryo development.
  • 加载中
  • Supplemental Table S1 PbWOX primers used for semi-qPCR and qPCR.
  • [1]

    Yang Z, Wu X, Grossnickle SC, Chen L, Yu X, et al. 2020. Formula fertilization promotes Phoebe bournei robust seedling cultivation. Forests 11:781

    doi: 10.3390/f11070781

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Li T, Min X. 2020. Dormancy characteristics and germination requirements of Phoebe bournei seed. Scientia Horticulturae 260:108903

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2019.108903

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Zhang J, Zhang S, Han S, Wu T, Li X, et al. 2012. Genome-wide identification of microRNAs in larch and stage-specific modulation of 11 conserved microRNAs and their targets during somatic embryogenesis. Planta 236:647−57

    doi: 10.1007/s00425-012-1643-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Dodeman VL, Ducreux G, Kreis M. 1997. Zygotic embryogenesis versus somatic embryogenesis. Journal of Experimental Botany 48:1493−509

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/48.8.1493

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Wang F, Shang G, Wu L, Xu Z, Zhao X, et al. 2020. Chromatin accessibility dynamics and a hierarchical transcriptional regulatory network structure for plant somatic embryogenesis. Developmental Cell 54:742−757.E8

    doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2020.07.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Méndez-Hernández HA, Ledezma-Rodríguez M, Avilez-Montalvo RN, Juárez-Gómez YL, Skeete A, et al. 2019. Signaling overview of plant somatic embryogenesis. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:77

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00077

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Chen Y, Xu X, Liu Z, Zhang Z, Xu X, et al. 2020. Global scale transcriptome analysis reveals differentially expressed genes involve in early somatic embryogenesis in Dimocarpus longan Lour. BMC Genomics 21:4

    doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-6393-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Elhiti M, Mira MM, So KKY, Stasolla C, Hebelstrup KH. 2021. Synthetic strigolactone GR24 improves Arabidopsis somatic embryogenesis through changes in auxin responses. Plants 10:2720

    doi: 10.3390/plants10122720

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Qi S, Zhao R, Yan J, Fan Y, Huang C, et al. 2021. Global transcriptome and coexpression network analyses reveal new insights into somatic embryogenesis in Hybrid Sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua × Liquidambar formosana). Frontiers in Plant Science 12:751866

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.751866

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Li M, Wrobel-Marek J, Heidmann I, Horstman A, Chen B, et al. 2022. Auxin biosynthesis maintains embryo identity and growth during BABY BOOM-induced somatic embryogenesis. Plant Physiology 188:1095−110

    doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab558

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Xu W, Zhang M, Wang C, Lou X, Han X, et al. 2020. Somatic embryo induction and agrobacterium-mediated transformation of embryonic callus tissue in Phoebe bournei, an endangered woody species in Lauraceae. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 48:572−87

    doi: 10.15835/nbha48211946

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Han X, Zhang J, Han S, Chong S, Meng G, et al. 2022. The chromosome-scale genome of Phoebe bournei reveals contrasting fates of terpene synthase (TPS)-a and TPS-b subfamilies. Plant Communications100410

    doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2022.100410

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Hou J, Wu Y, Shen Y, Mao Y, Liu W, et al. 2015. Plant regeneration through somatic embryogenesis and shoot organogenesis from immature zygotic embryos of Sapium sebiferum Roxb. Scientia Horticulturae 197:218−25

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.09.040

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Kong D, Hao Y, Cui H. 2016. The WUSCHEL related homeobox protein WOX7 regulates the sugar response of lateral root development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Molecular Plant 9:261−70

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2015.11.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Xiao Y, Chen Y, Ding Y, Wu J, Wang P, et al. 2018. Effects of GhWUS from upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) on somatic embryogenesis and shoot regeneration. Plant Science 270:157−65

    doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.02.018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Nowak K, Morończyk J, Grzyb M, Szczygieł-Sommer A, Gaj MD. 2022. miR172 regulates WUS during somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis via AP2. Cells 11:718

    doi: 10.3390/cells11040718

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Hassani SB, Trontin JF, Raschke J, Zoglauer K, Rupps A. 2022. Constitutive overexpression of a conifer WOX2 homolog affects somatic embryo development in Pinus pinaster and promotes somatic embryogenesis and organogenesis in Arabidopsis seedlings. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:838421

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.838421

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Mayer KF, Schoof H, Haecker A, Lenhard M, Jürgens G, et al. 1998. Role of WUSCHEL in regulating stem cell fate in the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Cell 95:805−15

    doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81703-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Haecker A, Gross-Hardt R, Geiges B, Sarkar A, Breuninger H, et al. 2004. Expression dynamics of WOX genes mark cell fate decisions during early embryonic patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 131:657−68

    doi: 10.1242/dev.00963

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Breuninger H, Rikirsch E, Hermann M, Ueda M, Laux T. 2008. Differential expression of WOX genes mediates apical-basal axis formation in the Arabidopsis embryo. Developmental Cell 14:867−76

    doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2008.03.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Palovaara J, Hallberg H, Stasolla C, Hakman I. 2010. Comparative expression pattern analysis of WUSCHEL-related homeobox 2 (WOX2) and WOX8/9 in developing seeds and somatic embryos of the gymnosperm Picea abies. New Phytologist 188:122−35

    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03336.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Gambino G, Minuto M, Boccacci P, Perrone I, Vallania R, et al. 2011. Characterization of expression dynamics of WOX homeodomain transcription factors during somatic embryogenesis in Vitis vinifera. Journal of Experimental Botany 62:1089−101

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq349

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Tvorogova VE, Fedorova YA, Potsenkovskaya EA, Kudriashov AA, Efremova EP, et al. 2019. The WUSCHEL-related homeobox transcription factor MtWOX9-1 stimulates somatic embryogenesis in Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 138:517−27

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-019-01648-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Zhang A, Li Y, Yarra R, Li R, Cao H, et al. 2022. Genome-wide identification of WUSCHEL-related Homeobox gene family and their expression analysis during somatic embryogenesis in Oil Palm (Elaeis guineensis). Tropical Plant Biology 15:55−64

    doi: 10.1007/s12042-021-09299-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Horstman A, Bemer M, Boutilier K. 2017. A transcriptional view on somatic embryogenesis. Regeneration 4:201−16

    doi: 10.1002/reg2.91

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Garcia C, Furtado de Almeida AA, Costa M, Britto D, Valle R, et al. 2019. Abnormalities in somatic embryogenesis caused by 2, 4-D: an overview. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 137:193−212

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-019-01569-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Su YH, Zhao XY, Liu YB, Zhang CL, O'Neill SD, Zhang XS. 2009. Auxin-induced WUS expression is essential for embryonic stem cell renewal during somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 59:448−60

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2009.03880.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Wójcikowska B, Jaskóła K, Gąsiorek P, Meus M, Nowak K, et al. 2013. LEAFY COTYLEDON2 (LEC2) promotes embryogenic induction in somatic tissues of Arabidopsis, via YUCCA-mediated auxin biosynthesis. Planta 238:425−40

    doi: 10.1007/s00425-013-1892-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Wójcik AM, Wójcikowska B, Gaj MD. 2020. Current perspectives on the auxin-mediated genetic network that controls the induction of somatic embryogenesis in plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences21

    doi: 10.3390/ijms21041333

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Mazri MA, Meziani R, Belkoura I, Mokhless B, Nour S. 2018. A combined pathway of organogenesis and somatic embryogenesis for an efficient large-scale propagation in date palm (Phoenix dactylifera L.) cv. Mejhoul. 3 Biotech 8:215

    doi: 10.1007/s13205-018-1235-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Cipriano JLD, Cruz ACF, Mancini KC, Schmildt ER, Lopes JC, et al. 2018. Somatic embryogenesis in Carica papaya as affected by auxins and explants, and morphoanatomical-related aspects. Anais Da Academia Brasileira De Ciencias 90:385−400

    doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201820160252

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Lelu-Walter MA, Gautier F, Eliášová K, Sanchez L, Teyssier C, et al. 2018. High gellan gum concentration and secondary somatic embryogenesis: two key factors to improve somatic embryo development in Pseudotsuga menziesii [Mirb.]. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 132:137−55

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-017-1318-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Ruduś I, Kępczyńska E, Kępczyński J. 2006. Comparative efficacy of abscisic acid and methyl jasmonate for indirect somatic embryogenesis in Medicago sativa L. Plant Growth Regulation 48:1−11

    doi: 10.1007/s10725-005-5136-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Cheng T, Meng Y, Chen J, Shi J. 2017. Effects of methyl jasmonic acid on somatic embryogenesis of Liriodendron hybrid. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition) 41:41−46

    Google Scholar

    [35]

    Chen C, Chen H, Zhang Y, Thomas HR, Frank MH, et al. 2020. TBtools: an integrative toolkit developed for interactive analyses of big biological data. Molecular Plant 13:1194−202

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.06.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCᴛ Method. Methods 25:402−8

    doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Zhang X, Zong J, Liu J, Yin J, Zhang D. 2010. Genome-wide analysis of WOX gene family in rice, sorghum, maize, Arabidopsis and poplar. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 52:1016−26

    doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00982.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Wang P, Guo Y, Chen X, Zheng Y, Sun Y, et al. 2019. Genome-wide identification of WOX genes and their expression patterns under different hormone and abiotic stress treatments in tea plant (Camellia sinensis). Trees 33:1129−42

    doi: 10.1007/s00468-019-01847-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Liu B, Wang L, Zhang J, Li J, Zheng H, et al. 2014. WUSCHEL-related Homeobox genes in Populus tomentosa: diversified expression patterns and a functional similarity in adventitious root formation. BMC Genomics 15:296

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-296

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Hirakawa Y, Kondo Y, Fukuda H. 2010. TDIF peptide signaling regulates vascular stem cell proliferation via the WOX4 homeobox gene in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 22:2618−29

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.076083

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Etchells JP, Smit ME, Gaudinier A, Williams CJ, Brady SM. 2016. A brief history of the TDIF-PXY signalling module: balancing meristem identity and differentiation during vascular development. New Phytologist 209:474−84

    doi: 10.1111/nph.13642

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Kucukoglu M, Nilsson J, Zheng B, Chaabouni S, Nilsson O. 2017. WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX4 (WOX4)-like genes regulate cambial cell division activity and secondary growth in Populus trees. New Phytologist 215:642−57

    doi: 10.1111/nph.14631

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Liu J, Sheng L, Xu Y, Li J, Yang Z, et al. 2014. WOX11 and 12 are involved in the first-step cell fate transition during de novo root organogenesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 26:1081−93

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.114.122887

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Sheng L, Hu X, Du Y, Zhang G, Huang H, et al. 2017. Non-canonical WOX11-mediated root branching contributes to plasticity in Arabidopsis root system architecture. Development 144:3126−33

    doi: 10.1242/dev.152132

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Liu J, Hu X, Qin P, Prasad K, Hu Y, et al. 2018. The WOX11-LBD16 Pathway promotes pluripotency acquisition in callus cells during de novo shoot regeneration in tissue culture. Plant and Cell Physiology 59:739−43

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcy010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Zuo J, Niu QW, Frugis G, Chua NH. 2002. The WUSCHEL gene promotes vegetative-to-embryonic transition in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 30:349−59

    doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.2002.01289.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Arroyo-Herrera A, Ku Gonzalez A, Canche Moo R, Quiroz-Figueroa FR, Loyola-Vargas VM, et al. 2008. Expression of WUSCHEL in Coffea canephora causes ectopic morphogenesis and increases somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 94:171−80

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-008-9401-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Kadri A, Grenier De March G, Guerineau F, Cosson V, Ratet P. 2021. WUSCHEL overexpression promotes callogenesis and somatic embryogenesis in Medicago truncatula Gaertn. Plants 10:715

    doi: 10.3390/plants10040715

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Palovaara J, Hakman I. 2008. Conifer WOX-related homeodomain transcription factors, developmental consideration and expression dynamic of WOX2 during Picea abies somatic embryogenesis. Plant Molecular Biology 66:533−49

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-008-9289-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Hu X, Xu L. 2016. Transcription factors WOX11/12 directly activate WOX5/7 to promote root primordia initiation and organogenesis. Plant Physiology 172:2363−73

    doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01067

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Ikeuchi M, Iwase A, Ito T, Tanaka H, Favero DS, et al. 2022. Wound-inducible WUSCHEL-RELATED HOMEOBOX 13 is required for callus growth and organ reconnection. Plant Physiology 188:425−41

    doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab510

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Gulzar B, Mujib A, Malik MQ, Sayeed R, Mamgain J, Ejaz B. 2020. Genes, proteins and other networks regulating somatic embryogenesis in plants. Journal, Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology 18:31

    doi: 10.1186/s43141-020-00047-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Raghavan V. 2004. Role of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) in somatic embryogenesis on cultured zygotic embryos of Arabidopsis: Cell expansion, cell cycling, and morphogenesis of embryos exposed to 2,4-D continuously. American Journal of Botany 91:1743−56

    doi: 10.3732/ajb.91.11.1743

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    von Arnold S, Sabala I, Bozhkov P, Dyachok J, Filonova L. 2002. Developmental pathways of somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 69:233−49

    doi: 10.1023/A:1015673200621

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Rai MK, Shekhawat NS, Harish, Gupta AK, Phulwaria M, et al. 2011. The role of abscisic acid in plant tissue culture: a review of recent progress. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 106:179−90

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-011-9923-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Michalczuk L, Ribnicky DM, Cooke TJ, Cohen JD. 1992. Regulation of indole-3-acetic acid biosynthetic pathways in carrot cell cultures. Plant Physiology 100:1346−53

    doi: 10.1104/pp.100.3.1346

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Godel-Jedrychowska K, Kulinska-Lukaszek K, Horstman A, Soriano M, Li M, et al. 2020. Symplasmic isolation marks cell fate changes during somatic embryogenesis. Journal of Experimental Botany 71:2612−28

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa041

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Palovaara J, Hakman I. 2009. WOX2 and polar auxin transport during spruce embryo pattern formation. Plant Signal & Behavior 4:153−55

    doi: 10.4161/psb.4.2.7684

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Maruyama TE, Ueno S, Mori H, Kaneeda T, Moriguchi Y. 2021. Factors influencing somatic embryo maturation in Sugi (Japanese Cedar, Cryptomeria japonica (Thunb. ex L. f.) D. Don). Plants 10:874

    doi: 10.3390/plants10050874

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Li H, Li X, Sun M, Chen S, Ma H, et al. 2021. Molecular characterization and gene expression analysis of tomato WOX transcription factor family under abiotic stress and phytohormone treatment. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology 30:973−86

    doi: 10.1007/s13562-021-00723-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Tian Q, Lin Y, Yang M, Zhang D, Lai R, et al. 2015. DlRan3A is involved in hormone, light, and abiotic stress responses in embryogenic callus of Dimocarpus longan Lour. Gene 569:267−75

    doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.06.013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Abdelsalam A, Mahran E, Chowdhury K, Boroujerdi A, El-Bakry A. 2021. Effect of exogenous methyl jasmonate on in vitro propagation, metabolic profiling and proximadiol production from Cymbopogon schoenanthus subsp. proximus. Plant Physiology Reports 26:548−60

    doi: 10.1007/s40502-021-00608-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Zhang M, Chen X, Lou X, Zhang Y, Han X, et al. 2023. Identification of WUSCHEL-related homeobox (WOX) gene family members and determination of their expression profiles during somatic embryogenesis in Phoebe bournei. Forestry Research 3:5 doi: 10.48130/FR-2023-0005
    Zhang M, Chen X, Lou X, Zhang Y, Han X, et al. 2023. Identification of WUSCHEL-related homeobox (WOX) gene family members and determination of their expression profiles during somatic embryogenesis in Phoebe bournei. Forestry Research 3:5 doi: 10.48130/FR-2023-0005

Figures(6)  /  Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(4022) PDF downloads(560)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Identification of WUSCHEL-related homeobox (WOX) gene family members and determination of their expression profiles during somatic embryogenesis in Phoebe bournei

Forestry Research  3 Article number: 5  (2023)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: WUSCHEL-related homeobox (WOX) transcription factor (TF)-encoding genes play crucial roles during embryo development. The function of WOX genes in embryonic development has been thoroughly studied in Arabidopsis thaliana, but little is known about their function in woody species, especially Phoebe bournei, an endemic and endangered species in China. In the present study, a total of 15 WOX genes were identified in P. bournei, and phylogenetic analysis resulted in their assignment to three typical clades: an ancient clade, an intermediate clade, and a modern/WUS clade. The gene structure and sequence characteristics and the physicochemical properties of WOX proteins were also analyzed. Promoter prediction indicated that WOX genes are likely involved in plant growth and development and hormone responses. Subsequently, we evaluated the expression patterns of WOX genes in response to auxin (IAA), abscisic acid (ABA), and methyl jasmonate (MeJA) treatments. According to tissue-specific expression patterns, we screened nine WOX genes that were present in embryonic calli and that might participate in the somatic embryogenesis (SE) of P. bournei. Furthermore, the expression profiles of these nine WOX genes during three phases of embryogenic calli development and three phases of somatic embryo development, namely, spheroid embryogenesis, immature cotyledon-producing embryogenesis and mature cotyledon-producing embryogenesis, were monitored. Overall, we systematically analyzed the expression patterns of WOX genes in P. bournei during SE, the information of which provides a basis for further elucidating the molecular mechanism through which WOX TFs function in P. bournei embryo development.

    • Phoebe bournei, a rare and endangered protected tree species that is unique to China, which produces excellent material and fragrance, can be used for the production of furniture and as an ornamental tree[1] . However, few natural resources of this species are available, and this species undergoes a long juvenile phase. Currently, seed propagation is the main reproduction technique, and unstable yields driven by fruiting characteristics has a large impact on seedling production[2].

      Somatic embryogenesis (SE) is one of the most important techniques for tree breeding programs, but the mechanism underlying SE is poorly understood[3]. In angiosperms, a mature somatic embryo is induced from embryonic calli and subsequently develops into spherical, heart-shaped, torpedo, and cotyledon-producing embryos[4]. Moreover, regulation of the different stages of SE requires specific cell fate changes, and many transcription factors (TFs) are involved in this process. For example, WUSCHEL (WUS), WUSCHEL-related homeobox (WOX), BABY BOOM (BBM), AGAMOUS-like (AGL), LEAFY COTYLEDON (LEC), Receptor-Like Kinase (SERK), and Vmyb Avian Myeloblastosis Viral Oncogene Homolog (MYB) genes function as indispensable regulators transforming nonembryogenic calli cells into embryogenic calli cells or driving changes between the different developmental stages of SE[510]. As such, SE requires precise transcriptional regulation. SE regeneration techniques have been determined for P. bournei[11], and high-quality genomic data of this species have been released by our group[12]. However, the transcriptional regulatory mechanism behind the transitions among the different stages of SE in P. bournei remains elusive.

      An increasing number of studies have shown that WOXs are extensively involved in plant organ regeneration, growth and development, stress responses, and other transcriptional regulatory processes, especially those that occur during SE[1317]. In Arabidopsis, AtWUS was shown to be expressed at the proembryonic (16-cell) stage and is involved in subsequent maturation during SE[18]. AtWOX2, AtWOX8, and AtWOX9 participate in polarity establishment during early embryonic development, and AtWOX2 is expressed in apical cells, while AtWOX8 and AtWOX9 are expressed specifically in basal cells, which are indispensable for the correct establishment of the apical–basal axis[19,20]. Moreover, PaWOX2 was also shown to be highly expressed in embryogenic cells in Picea abies[21], and the overexpression of PpWOX2 was shown to affect related traits of somatic embryos in Pinus pinaster[17]. In Vitis vinifera, VvWOX2 and VvWOX9 are expressed at high levels during SE and can be used as marker genes for SE[22]. Furthermore, MtWOX9-1 was shown to increase the embryogenic capacity of recalcitrant plant species, e.g., Medicago truncatula[23]. These studies have shown that WOXs are crucial during the process of embryonic development or somatic embryo regeneration. Moreover, in woody plant species, global transcriptomic data and expression analysis have resulted in the identification of WOXs expressed during SE in Dimocarpus longan, hybrid sweetgum, and Elaeis guineensis, suggesting that WOXs are functionally conserved in woody plants species[7,9,24]. Based on this, understanding the dynamic relationship between WOXs and SE in P. bournei is helpful for optimizing the somatic embryo regeneration system and creating a large number of clones rapidly.

      Previous studies have shown that overexpression or ectopic expression of embryogenesis-related TFs can induce the SE process. Another way is to apply exogenous phytohormones[25]. Adding exogenous phytohormones to media can affect the morphology and quality of SE in many species[26]. The interactions between phytohormones and TFs has been under increasing scrutiny. Several studies have shown that some TFs, such as LEC2, BBM, and WUS, are regulated by auxin synthesis, transport, and responses during SE[10,27,28]. Correct establishment of the auxin gradient and PIN1-mediated auxin transport were shown to affect the expression level of WUS, which in turn affected the status of the embryonic calli[27]. LEC2 and BBM transcriptionally regulate the endogenous auxin (IAA) biosynthesis-related genes YUCs/TAAs and increase the DR5 auxin response, further maintaining somatic embryo growth[10,28,29]. Furthermore, LEC2 was shown to bind directly to the early embryonic marker genes WOX2 and WOX3, triggering SE[5,25]. Abscisic acid (ABA) is another important hormone involved in SE, especially during embryo maturation. Application of exogenous ABA to the media was shown to induce embryo maturation and prevent early germination in Carica papaya, Pseudotsuga menziesii, and Phoenix dactylifera[3032]. Methyl jasmonate (MeJA) plays a function similar to that of ABA in promoting mature SE. MeJA functions synergistically with ABA, but the effects of MeJA cannot replace the effects of ABA[33]. In Liriodendron hybrids, MeJA was shown to increase both SE and the maturation rate and decreased the deformation rate[34]. However, studies on the relationships between MeJA and WOXs are lacking. Taken together, these results suggested that TFs and hormones jointly regulate plant SE. In P. bournei, how WOXs respond to hormones during SE has not been thoroughly characterized. So we preliminarily explored the expression patterns of WOX under auxin, ABA, and MeJA treatments.

      In the present study, 15 WOX genes were identified across the P. bournei genome, and their gene structures and protein sequences were characterized. Then, the expression patterns of WOXs among six tissues and at different stages of SE were determined. To elucidate how these WOXs respond to hormones, their expression levels in response to auxin, ABA, and MeJA were analyzed. Our results revealed WOX members in P. bournei and several possible associations between WOXs and plant hormones. The results of this study will provide further insight into the function of WOXs involved in regulating SE in woody plant.

    • The half-sibling family of P. bournei designated 'WY1' was cultivated in the greenhouse. The epicotyls, stem tips, roots, stems, and leaves of three-month-old seedlings and embryogenic calli induced from immature embryos were frozen in liquid N2 and used for semiquantitative analysis of PbWOX genes. Growth of embryonic calli was induced in cotyledon-stage embryos of the 'WY1' mother tree and subcultured at 24 °C in the dark, as described in our previous study[11]. Somatic embryos of P. bournei at six developmental stages, including three stages of calli, the globular embryo stage, and immature and mature cotyledon-producing embryo stages, were collected under a stereomicroscope (OLYMPUS, Beijing, China) and then frozen in liquid N2 for RNA extraction. With respect to calli growth in liquid media for hormone treatment, 0.1 g of calli was transferred to liquid media supplemented with 100 μM IAA, ABA, and MeJA for 3, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h. Calli in untreated liquid media were used as controls. Sampling was performed at the same time, and three replicates were included.

    • The PbWOXs were identified by two methods. Firstly, using the hidden Markov model, we downloaded the sequence of the conserved homeobox domain of the WOX (PFAM00046) from an online website (http://pfam.xfam.org), and the hmm search module in HMMER (version 3.1) software was used to search the protein sequences of the P. bournei genome[12]. The threshold was set to < E20. Secondly, we downloaded 15 AtWOXs proteins sequence from the TAIR database (www.arabidopsis.org), then used them as query sequences to perform the BLASTp search (E-value < 1e-5) with P. bournei protein sequences. By combining the two methods, candidate sequences without a homeobox domain were omitted. The 15 obtained PbWOX protein sequences were subjected to MUSCLE alignment of MEGA (version 7.0) together with the sequences of 15 AtWOXs, 13 OsWOXs, 18 PtWOXs, eight AtriWOXs, seven SmWOXs, three PpaWOXs, one OstuaWOX, and one OstluWOX protein downloaded from the online Plant Transcription Factor Database (PlantTFDB) website (http://planttfdb.cbi.pku.edu.cn). The neighbor-joining (NJ) method with 1000 bootstrap repetitions was subsequently used to construct a phylogenetic tree, and the other parameters were set to their default.

    • Exons and introns of individual PbWOXs were visualized via the online software Gene Structure Display Server (GSDS) (version 2.0) (http://gsds.gao-lab.org), and Multiple Em for Motif Elicitation (MEME) (version 5.11) (http://meme-suite.org/) was used to predict the motifs of the PbWOX family proteins. The ProtParam (https://web.expasy.org/protparam/) online website was subsequently used to predict the physicochemical properties of PbWOX family members, such as their number of amino acids, molecular weight, and isoelectric point. ClustalX (version 1.81) was used for multiple sequence alignment to confirm the presence of WUS-box domain and the homeobox domain. The genome sequence and gene annotation information file was added to the TBtools GFF3 Sequence Extractor submenu, the upstream bases was set to 2000, the upstream CDS 2.0 kb of all genes in P. bournei were obtained. Then 2.0 kb upstream promoter sequences of 15 PbWOX genes were obtained from the TBtools quick fasta extractor submenu[12,35]. Finally, we uploaded the obtained file to an online site PlantCARE (http://bioinformatics.psb.ugent.be/webtools/plantcare/html/) to analyze cis-acting elements.

    • Total RNA was extracted using a RNAprep Pure Plant Kit (TIANGEN, Beijing, China). Then, the RNA was quantified by a Nanodrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer and checked according to the A260/280 nm and A260/A230 nm values. Subsequently, cDNA was synthesized using a PrimeScriptTM RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Perfect Real Time) (Takara, Dalian, China), and each RNA sample was 2000 ng. The obtained cDNA was subsequently diluted five times for quantitative RT‒PCR.

      Specific primers of the 15 PbWOX genes were designed using the Primer 3 online website (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/), and the sequences of these primers are listed in Supplemental Table S1. The expression levels of the PbWOX genes were detected via quantitative RT–PCR and a CFX 96-well Real-Time PCR System (Bio-Rad, USA). The qPCR mixture volume was 10 μL, which comprised 5 μL of 2× ChamQTM SYBR qPCR Master Mix, 0.4 μL of cDNA, 0.2 μL of forward primer, 0.2 μL of reverse primer, and 4.2 μL of ddH2O. The PCR was carried out as follows: predegeneration at 95 °C for 1 min, 45 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s followed by annealing at 57 °C for 10 s, and extension at 72 °C for 20 s. PbEF1α was used as an internal control, and the relative gene expression levels were calculated according to the 2−ΔΔCᴛ method[36].

    • All the treatments were performed at least three times. The data were subjected to ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test at the 5% significance level via SPSS (version 26.0) software.

    • After performing hidden Markov model (HMM) searches and removing redundant and/or sequences without the homeobox domain, we identified 15 PbWOX members. Phylogenetic analysis of 15 AtWOXs, 18 PtWOXs, 13 OsWOXs, eight AtriWOXs, seven SmWOXs, three PpaWOXs and WOX protein sequences from two green algal species resulted in the assignment of the 15 PbWOX genes to an ancient branch, an intermediate branch and a modern/WUS branch (Table 1). Specifically, the ancient branch consisted of three PbWOXs (PbWOX13a, PbWOX13b, and PbWOX13c); the intermediate branch consisted of four PbWOXs, namely, PbWOX9, PbWOX11/12a, PbWOX11/12b, and PbWOX11/12c, which were classified into two subclasses; and the remaining eight members, namely PbWUS, PbWOX1a, PbWOX1b, PbWOX2a, PbWOX2b, PbWOX3, PbWOX4 and PbWOX5/7, were assigned to the modern/WUS branch (Fig. 1a).

      Figure 1. 

      Phylogenetic relationships of PbWOX proteins. (a) NJ tree constructed of the amino acid sequence of WOXs from Phoebe bournei (Pb), Arabidopsis thaliana (At), Populus trichocarpa (Pt), Oryza sativa (Os), Amborella trichopoda (Atri), Selaginella moellendorffii (Sm), Physcomitrella patens (Ppa), Ostreococcus tauri (Ostau) and Ostreococcus lucimarinus (Ostlu). (b) Synteny analysis of WOX genes between P. bournei and A. thaliana. Gray lines indicate all synteny blocks in the genome, and the red lines indicate duplicated WOX gene pairs.

      Table 1.  Subclass information of WOXs among P. bournei and other representative species.

      Taxonomic groupSpeciesAncient cladeIntermediate cladeModern/ WUS
      clade
      Total
      DicotsA. thaliana34815
      P. trichocarpa671118
      MonocotsO. sativa16613
      MagnolialesP. bournei34815
      AmborellalesA. trichopoda1258
      PteridophytaS. moellendorffii617
      BryophytaP. patens33
      ChlorophytaO. tauri11
      O. lucimarinus11

      However, the number of PbWOX genes was the same as that of Arabidopsis (Fig. 1a). Nonetheless, PbWOXs probably expanded differently than did those of Arabidopsis. For example, three homologs of AtWOX11/12 and AtWOX13, two homologs of AtWOX1 and AtWOX2, one homolog each of AtWUS, AtWOX3, AtWOX4, AtWOX5/7, and AtWOX9, and no homologs of AtWOX6 and AtWOX10 were found in P. bournei (Fig. 1b).

    • A sequence analysis of the PbWOXs showed that PbWOX1b comprised the largest number of amino acid residues (528) and had the largest molecular weight (59.19 kD). Conversely, PbWOX5/7 comprised 169 amino acid residues and had the smallest molecular weight (19.37 kD). All PbWOX genes contain introns, the number of which ranged from two to eight (Fig. 2a). Then, to better understand each member of the PbWOXs, we predicted the physicochemical properties by the use of an online website. The theoretical isoelectric point of PbWOX was found to be between 5.48 (PbWOX11/12c) and 9.93 (PbWOX13c) (Table 2).

      Figure 2. 

      Information on the PbWOX genes and proteins. (a) Phylogenetic tree and gene structure. (b) Architecture of conserved protein motifs. (c) Multiple sequence alignment.

      Table 2.  Summary of the PbWOX gene family members.

      Gene IDGene nameOrthologous in ArabidopsisTheoretical pIMolecular weightNumber of amino acids
      OF24054-RAPbWUSAtWUS8.5831622.96276
      OF03970-RAPbWOX1aAtWOX19.3737209.6328
      OF11837-RAPbWOX1bAtWOX18.8959188.97528
      OF19048-RAPbWOX2aAtWOX27.0924524.5218
      OF05256-RAPbWOX2bAtWOX26.8324496.61219
      OF16243-RAPbWOX3AtWOX39.0522752.66194
      OF04424-RAPbWOX4AtWOX48.2524797.85220
      OF05362-RAPbWOX5/7AtWOX5, AtWOX79.5119371.68169
      OF24594-RAPbWOX9AtWOX97.1945272.57413
      OF22069-RAPbWOX11/12aAtWOX11, AtWOX125.6830055.89268
      OF11766-RAPbWOX11/12bAtWOX11, AtWOX125.9530330.35277
      OF28194-RAPbWOX11/12cAtWOX11, AtWOX125.4827450.91252
      OF25757-RAPbWOX13aAtWOX135.9132705.61288
      OF14063-RAPbWOX13bAtWOX136.1032380.27286
      OF07768-RAPbWOX13cAtWOX139.9331294.66272

      Motif 1 and motif 2 were detected in all 15 PbWOXs, motif 3 was specific to the members of the intermediate clade, motif 4 (T-L-X-L-F-P-X-X, where X indicates any amino acid) was present in all members of the modern/WUS clade except PbWOX5/7, and motif 5 was specific to PbWOX13a and PbWOX13b (Fig. 2b). There are residues composing homeobox domain motifs that contain three helixes spaced by one loop and one turn (Fig. 2c). Eight members in the modern/WUS clade shared a WUS-box domain (Fig. 2c).

    • The cis-acting elements in the promoter region of PbWOXs were divided into four main categories: light-related, hormone-related, stress-related and development-related. (Fig. 3). Specifically, the light response elements constituted the largest proportion, of which the number of G-box elements was the largest. Several other elements involved circadian rhythm were also detected. The hormone-responsive elements included 45 ABA-responsive elements (ABREs), 30 MeJA-responsive elements (CGTCA motif–containing elements), 24 gibberellin (GA)-responsive elements (P-boxes, GARE motif–containing elements, TATC-boxes), 10 salicylic acid-responsive elements (TCA-elements), and nine auxin-responsive elements (TGA-elements, AuxREs, AuxRR-core elements). Abiotic stress response elements were predicted with 38 regulatory anaerobic inductor elements (ARE), 20 drought-responsive elements that could bind MYBs (MBSs), 15 low-temperature–responsive elements (LTRs), eight defense- and stress-responsive elements and five anoxic-specific induction-responsive elements. Moreover, in development-related cis-acting elements, 14 CAT boxes, 12 O2-sites, and six RY elements were predicted, respectively. In the PbWOX promoters, the most common cis-acting elements were G-boxes (light-related), ABREs (ABA-related), CGTCA motif-containing elements (MeJA-related) and AREs (drought-related). This result implied that PbWOX participated in plant growth process and stress response.

      Figure 3. 

      Predicted cis-acting elements in PbWOX promoters. (a) Frequency of cis-acting elements in the 2.0 kb upstream regions of PbWOXs. The corresponding colored bar chart indicates the occurrence of different cis-acting elements. (b) Number of cis-acting elements in each WOX gene.

    • To further understand the potential roles of PbWOXs during different developmental stages and at different physiological status, semi-qPCR was used to study the expression patterns of 15 PbWOXs in six tissues. The expression levels of PbWOXs varied significantly among the tissues (Fig. 4). Specifically, five genes, namely, PbWOX2a, PbWOX5/7, PbWOX9, PbWOX13a, and PbWOX13b, were expressed in almost all the tissues, while PbWUS, PbWOX1a, PbWOX2b and PbWOX3 were highly expressed in the epicotyls, with low or no expression in the other tissues. In addition, PbWOX11/12a, PbWOX11/12b and PbWOX11/12c were highly expressed specifically in both the roots and embryogenic calli, while expression of PbWOX1b and PbWOX4 was nearly absent in the calli. In total, nine PbWOXs were expressed in embryogenic calli, and thus, these genes may be involved in the SE of P. bournei; PbWOX2a exhibited the highest expression level.

      Figure 4. 

      Semiquantitative analysis of PbWOXs in different tissues. (a) Tissue samples, 1 - epicotyl, 2 - stem tip, 3 - root, 4 - stem, 5 - leaf, 6 - calli. (b) Semiquantitative PCR electropherogram.

    • Previous studies have shown that WOXs play important roles during SE. The expression levels of nine PbWOXs were analyzed in calli at three different developmental stages (Fig. 5ac) and in embryos at three different developmental stages (Fig. 5dg). Embryonic calli were induced by immature zygotic embryos (Fig. 5a); then, the embryonic calli developed to the second stage (Fig. 5b) after two or three rounds of propagation, and the calli developed to the third stage (Fig. 5c) after two rounds of propagation. Globular embryos (Fig. 5d), immature cotyledon-producing embryos (Fig. 5e) and mature cotyledon-producing embryos (Fig. 5f) were also selected. The qPCR results showed that the expression levels of PbWOX2a and PbWOX9 increased during embryogenic calli development but decreased as the embryos matured. PbWUS was specifically and highly expressed in the immature cotyledon-producing embryos. The expression level of PbWOX5/7 increased during calli development but decreased after calli differentiation. Three homologous genes, PbWOX11/12 and PbWOX13a, were highly expressed in cotyledon-producing embryos, and their expression peaked upon maturity (Fig. 5g).

      Figure 5. 

      Expression patterns of PbWOXs during SE of P. bournei. (a) Calli-1. (b) Calli-2. (c) Calli-3. (d) Globular embryo. (e) Immature cotyledon-producing embryo. (f) Mature cotyledon-producing embryo. (g) Analysis of gene expression via qPCR. The data are the means ± SDs of three biological replicates. The values followed by the same letter are not different according to Duncan’s multiple-range test. PbEF1α was used as an endogenous control.

    • With respect to the cis-acting elements of PbWOXs, we investigated the expression patterns of PbWOXs in response to auxin, ABA, and MeJA (Fig. 6). Under IAA treatment, PbWUS expression was induced and increased continuously as the treatment duration increased; PbWOX5/7 was strongly induced after 3 h of treatment, after which the expression level decreased. The expression levels of PbWOX2a and PbWOX9 significantly decreased, and the expression levels of PbWOX11/12b, PbWOX11/12c, PbWOX13a, and PbWOX13b also slightly decreased.

      Figure 6. 

      Relative expression levels of PbWOXs under hormone treatment. The data are the means ± SDs of three biological replicates. The values followed by the same letter are not different according to Duncan's multiple-range test. PbEF1α was used as an endogenous control.

      PbWUS was also induced in response to ABA treatment, while PbWOX2a, PbWOX9, and PbWOX13b were inhibited. The expression levels of PbWOX5/7 and PbWOX13a decreased, reached their lowest level after 12 h of ABA treatment, and then gradually increased. PbWOX11/12b and PbWOX11/12c showed similar expression patterns; their expression increased after 3 h but then decreased. PbWUS expression was induced in response to MeJA treatment, peaked at 12 h, and then gradually decreased. PbWOX5/7, PbWOX9 and PbWOX13b expression was inhibited significantly. PbWOX11/12b and PbWOX11/12c expression increased after 3 h but then decreased.

    • WOXs are specific to plants and largely involved in key developmental processes, especially those associated with somatic cell regeneration. With the publication of many plant genome sequences, WOX genes have been identified in several plant species. In the present study, we identified 15 PbWOXs, same as the number in Arabidopsis[37], and different orthologous revealed that chromosomal duplication events may occur in P. bournei. Furthermore, the length of introns showed regular characteristics across different clades. For instance, genes in the intermediate clade contained shorter intron sequences than did those of ancient clade, and five genes in the modern/WUS clade had the shortest intron. Taken together, these results suggested that the intron fragments underwent refinement during the evolution of the PbWOX genes. A similar phenomenon was observed in Camellia sinensis[38], which was exemplified by most WOX introns in members of the modern/WUS clade are much shorter than those in the ancient clade. In addition, compared with that in algae, ferns and other more ancestral plant species with one or two members, the WOX family gene in woody plant species has expanded in number and evolved in terms of sequence.

      Tissue-specific expression of a gene implies that the gene plays an indispensable role in certain tissues. We found that, like those in Arabidopsis, the WUS genes in P. bournei were mainly expressed in the epicotyls and shoot apical meristems (SAMs), but this is unlike the patterns of other popular genes, which are expressed in the SAMs, roots, stems, and leaves[39]. These results suggested that PbWUS might play a crucial role in maintaining the differentiation of the SAM. In Arabidopsis, AtWOX4 participates in TDIF-TDR-WOX4 signaling to maintain vascular meristem organization during secondary growth[40], which is similar to what occurs in poplar[41,42]. Here, PbWOX4 was also highly expressed in the stems; thus, this gene may have a function in P. bournei like that of its homologs in Arabidopsis and poplar. In addition, PbWOX4 was also expressed in the roots, leaves, and other plant tissues except embryogenic calli, suggesting that this gene is not involved in plant regeneration or development in vitro. Like AtWOX11, PtoWOX11/12a, and PtoWOX11/12b, three members, namely, PbWOX11/12a, PbWOX11/12b, and PbWOX11/12c, were expressed in the roots and embryogenic calli. Previous studies have shown that WOX11 is involved in adventitious root formation, which has an essential function in root regeneration during de novo plant regeneration[4346]. Therefore, it was speculated that these three PbWOX11 members might participate in calli propagation and/or root regeneration in P. bournei.

    • SE is one of the important mechanisms of plant asexual reproduction and is subject to complex transcriptional regulation, which in turn enables precise cell fate transitions and the formation of a complete plant. This hierarchical transcriptional regulatory network structure for SE has been revealed in Arabidopsis; in this process, WOX2 and WOX3 are the key TFs that induce SE[5]. According to the tissue expression patterns among tissues, we identified nine WOX genes that were expressed in embryogenic calli—the early stage of SE.

      WUS plays a crucial role in embryogenesis by promoting the fate of cells to transform and develop into embryos, and WUS can also drive the activity of embryonic stem cells. An earlier study showed that WUS is expressed in the four inner apical cells of 16-cell embryos and promotes the formation of the SAM during embryo development, and overexpression of WUS promotes the formation of high-frequency SE. Like in other species, such as Coffea canephora[47], Medicago truncatula[48], and Gossypium hirsutum[15], WUS overexpression resulted in an increased SE induction ratio. In our study, the expression level of WUS significantly increased in the late stage of embryogenic calli and increased significantly again at the immature cotyledon-producing embryo stage. These results indicated that PbWUS promotes the proliferation of embryogenic calli, affects the establishment of cell axial polarity, such as the formation of apical bud meristems during embryonic development in plants, and especially promotes the transition to cotyledon-producing embryos.

      In addition to WUS, WOX2 and WOX9 are the most reported WOX genes involved in plant SE. In the present study, PbWOX2a and PbWOX9 exhibited similar expression patterns, which were exemplified by higher expression levels observed at the embryogenic cell stage and during early somatic embryo formation. In Arabidopsis, it has been proposed that AtWOX2 and AtWOX9 play crucial roles in apical–basal axis formation during embryo development[19]. AtWOX2 is expressed in the apical cell, whereas AtWOX9 is expressed in the basal cell. These genes expressed at specific sites drive the fate of cells in the embryo. In grapevine, both VvWOX2 and VvWOX9 are labeled marker genes of early embryogenic phases[22]. In addition, WOX2 and WOX9 were found to play crucial roles in the early stage of SE in the gymnosperm Picea abies[21,49]. Therefore, PbWOX2a and PbWOX9 might be marker genes for early embryonic development of P. bournei.

      WOX11 has been reported to be an important upstream gene involved in the generation of root system architecture and to promote adventitious root formation during de novo root organogenesis from leaf explants[44,50], but this gene has not been found to be related to root regeneration in plant SE. We noted that PbWOX11/12a, PbWOX11/12b, and PbWOX11/12c were all detected in the embryogenic calli, specifically in immature and mature cotyledon-producing embryos. A similar phenomenon has been observed in grapevine, exemplified by VvWOX11 being highly expressed in torpedo-stage and cotyledon-producing embryos[22]. These findings further support that WOX11/12 might play an important role in the later stage of somatic embryo development and is probably related to root development, but whether WOX11/12 is involved in root primordium formation remains to be confirmed.

      In P. bournei, two WOX13 genes orthologous to AtWOX13 were detected in calli and somatic embryos, but their expression patterns differed. The expression level of PbWOX13a gradually increased with embryo development, while that of PbWOX13b showed no significant change. To our knowledge, WOX13 is expressed ubiquitously and participates in calli formation and organ reconnection in Arabidopsis[51]. However, the molecular regulatory roles of WOX13 during somatic embryo regeneration remain unclear, and expression profiles have been reported in only Vitis vinifera, in which three VvWOX13 genes exhibited low expression levels in somatic embryos, and the expression profile was unaffected by environmental changes[22]. Our data showed that two PbWOX13s also exhibited ubiquitous expression patterns. Nevertheless, PbWOX13b expression seemingly changed nonsignificantly during embryonic calli induction and mature cotyledon-producing embryos, while the expression level of PbWOX13a slightly increased in the later stage of somatic embryo development. Taken together, these results suggested that PbWOX13a might play a regulatory role at the later stage of somatic embryo development.

    • SE is a highly efficient method for plant regeneration[52]. Overexpression of WUS, WOX2, WOX9, BBM, and SERK is an efficient way to induce SE, and application of plant growth regulators such as auxin, MeJA, ABA, and GA is another useful method[6,47,5355]. These hormones undergo crosstalk with various TFs and play a primary role in SE[20]. However, information on interactions between phytohormones and WOX genes in P. bournei is lacking. In our study, referring to the information of cis-acting elements in the promoters of PbWOXs, we evaluated that the expression profiles of PbWOXs in embryogenic calli after treatment with IAA, MeJA, and ABA.

      Auxin was first discovered to affect embryonic initiation in carrot and has been widely used to induce SE not only in angiosperms but also in gymnosperms[56]. Moreover, studies have indicated that auxin distribution is positively correlated with the accumulation of WUS, WOX2, and WOX9 transcripts[27,57,58]. In P. bournei, the expression of WUS and WOX5/7 was induced by auxin. However, the expression of WOX2 and WOX9 was inhibited, opposite to what has been reported in Picea abies[49]. In view of this phenomenon, we analyzed the possible causes of species differences or differences in auxin concentration. Whether WOX2/WOX9 and auxin play a synergistic or antagonistic role in somatic embryo initiation remains to be determined.

      ABA involvement in embryo development and maturation has been demonstrated in the SE of several species. In late embryonic development, LEA proteins accumulate in large quantities and act as components of ABA-inducible systems. On the other hand, exogenous ABA in culture media has been shown to promote the maturation and regeneration of somatic embryos[55]. Previous studies have shown that embryo cells cultured in media supplemented with 100 μM ABA produced more embryos in sugi[59]. Six SlWOXs were significantly upregulated after 3 h of 100 μM ABA treatment in tomato[60]. Our data showed that PbWOX11/12a, PbWOX11/12b and PbWOX11/12c were also briefly induced after 3 h of ABA treatment. At the same time, these three genes were highly expressed in the cotyledon-producing embryo stage of SE. It was further speculated that the expression of PbWOX11/12s is likely to be activated by ABA signaling, thereby promoting somatic embryo maturation.

      MeJA is another hormone that increases somatic embryo induction and maturation rate. The effect of MeJA is similar to that of ABA to some extent, but it cannot replace ABA[33]. Previously, 50 μM and 100 μM MeJA were used to treat embryonic calli of longan[61], and exogenous applications of 10-400 μM MeJA produced more mature somatic embryos to different extents[62] Here, we used qPCR to measure the expression changes of PbWOXs after 100 μM MeJA treatment and hoped to determine the relationship between PbWOXs and MeJA. Our data showed that the expression levels of PbWUS and PbWOX11/12a were induced rapidly after MeJA treatment. In addition, the expression levels of PbWOX2a and PbWOX9 were inhibited by MeJA after 3 h. Therefore, applying MeJA to calli for a suitably short time might promote the somatic embryo differentiation process in P. bournei.

    • The WOX family is unique to plants, and WOX members play important regulatory roles in plant development, such as embryonic patterning. In the present study, we identified 15 PbWOX members in P. bournei, and their expression patterns among different tissues and SE process were determined, and the relationships between PbWOXs and hormones were also analyzed. These results are helpful to further study the regulatory roles of PbWOXs during SE, thus provides the important gene resources for regulating the SE process in P. bournei and other forestry trees.

      • We acknowledge Wenting Xu from Zhejiang A&F University for providing basic experimental materials. We thank for professor Longjun Cheng (Zhejiang A&F University) for his guidance. This work was supported by the Zhejiang Science and Technology Major Program on Agricultural New Variety Breeding (2021C02070-10), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32171828 and 32101545).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2023 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (6)  Table (2) References (62)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Zhang M, Chen X, Lou X, Zhang Y, Han X, et al. 2023. Identification of WUSCHEL-related homeobox (WOX) gene family members and determination of their expression profiles during somatic embryogenesis in Phoebe bournei. Forestry Research 3:5 doi: 10.48130/FR-2023-0005
    Zhang M, Chen X, Lou X, Zhang Y, Han X, et al. 2023. Identification of WUSCHEL-related homeobox (WOX) gene family members and determination of their expression profiles during somatic embryogenesis in Phoebe bournei. Forestry Research 3:5 doi: 10.48130/FR-2023-0005

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return