Search
2022 Volume 7
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Morphology and multigene phylogeny revealed Peroneutypa aquilariae sp. nov. (Diatrypaceae, Xylariales) from Aquilaria sinensis in Yunnan Province, China

More Information
  • Received Date: 28 November 2022
    Accepted Date: 30 November 2022
    Published Online: 22 December 2022
    Studies in Fungi  7 Article number: 18 (2022)  |  Cite this article
  • Dead twigs of Aquilaria sinensis (Thymelaeaceae) with fungal fruiting bodies were collected from Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province, China. After initial morphological observations, an interesting fungus whose morphologically resembled Peroneutypa was isolated. Molecular phylogeny of combined ITS and tub2 showed our fungal collection is phylogenetically closely related to P. mackenziei. However, in morphology, our fungal collection is distinct from P. mackenziei in having an ostiolar canal without periphyses and the absence of paraphyses. Based on unique morphological characteristics and multigene phylogenetic analyses results, our fungal isolate is described in this paper as Peroneutypa aquilariae sp. nov. In addition, this is the first report of the genus Peroneutypa from the host A. sinensis. Full description, illustrations, and a phylogenetic tree to show the placement of the new species are provided. A synoptic table of morphological characteristics in Peroneutypa reported worldwide is also provided.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Hyde KD, Norphanphoun C, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Bhat DJ, Jones EBG, et al. 2020. Refined families of Sordariomycetes. Mycosphere 11:305−1059

    doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Wijayawardene NN, Hyde KD, Dai DQ, Sánchez-García M, Goto BT, et al. 2022. Outline of Fungi and fungus-like taxa – 2021. Mycosphere 13:53−453

    doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/13/1/2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Maharachchikumbura SSN, Hyde KD, Jones EBG, McKenzie EHC, Bhat JD, et al. 2016. Families of Sordariomycetes. Fungal Diversity 79:1−317

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-016-0369-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Samarakoon MC, Hyde KD, Promputtha I, Hongsanan S, Ariyawansa HA, et al. 2016. Evolution of Xylariomycetidae (Ascomycota: Sordariomycetes). Mycosphere 7:1746−1761

    doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/7/11/9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Hongsanan S, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Hyde KD, Samarakoon MC, Jeewon R, et al. 2017. An updated phylogeny of Sordariomycetes based on phylogenetic and molecular clock evidence. Fungal Diversity 84:25−41

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-017-0384-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Perera RH, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Jones EBG, Bahkali AH, Elgorban AM, et al. 2017. Delonicicola siamense gen. & sp. nov. (Delonicicolaceae fam. nov., Delonicicolales ord. nov.), a saprobic species from Delonix regia seed pods. Cryptogamie Mycologie 38:321−40

    doi: 10.7872/crym/v38.iss3.2017.321

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Nitschke T. 1869. Verh. Naturhist. Vereines Preuss. Rheinl 26:73

    Google Scholar

    [8]

    Glawe DA, Rogers JD. 1984. Diatrypaceae in the Pacific Northwest. Mycotaxon 20:401−60

    Google Scholar

    [9]

    Rappaz F. 1987. Taxonomie et nomenclature des Diatrypaceae à asques octospores. Mycologia Helvetica 2:285−648

    Google Scholar

    [10]

    Mehrabi M, Hemmati R, Vasilyeva LN, Trouillas FP. 2015. A new species and a new record of Diatrypaceae from Iran. Mycosphere 6:60−68

    doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/6/1/7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    de Almeida DAC, Gusmão LFP, Miller AN. 2016. Taxonomy and molecular phylogeny of Diatrypaceae (Ascomycota, Xylariales) species from the Brazilian semi-arid region including four new species. Mycological Progress 15:1−27

    doi: 10.1007/s11557-016-1194-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Shang QJ, Hyde KD, Phookamsak R, Doilom M, Bhat BJ, et al. 2017. Diatrypella tectonae and Peroneutypa mackenziei spp, nov. (Diatrypaceae) from northern Thailand. Mycological Progress 16:463−476

    doi: 10.1007/s11557-017-1294-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Zhu H, Pan M, Wijayawardene NN, Jiang N, Ma R, et al. 2021. The hidden diversity of diatrypaceous fungi in China. Frontiers in Microbiology 12:646262

    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.646262

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Berlese AN. 1905. Icones fungorum omnium hucusque cognitorum 3. pp. 80–82

    [15]

    Acero FJ, González V, Sánchez-Ballesteros J, Rubio V, Checa J, et al. 2004. Molecular phylogenetic studies on the Diatrypaceae based on rDNA-ITS sequences. Mycologia 96:249−259

    doi: 10.1080/15572536.2005.11832975

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Carmarán CC, Romero AI, Giussani LM. 2006. An approach towards a new phylogenetic classification in Diatrypaceae. Fungal Diversity 23:67−87

    Google Scholar

    [17]

    Senwanna C, Phookamsak R, Doilom M, Hyde KD, Cheewangkoon R. 2017. Novel taxa of Diatrypaceae from Para rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in northern Thailand introducing a novel genus Allocryptovalsa. Mycosphere 8:1835−55

    doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/8/10/9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Shang QJ, Hyde KD, Jeewon R, Khan S, Promputtha I, et al. 2018. Morpho-molecular characterization of Peroneutypa (Diatrypaceae, Xylariales) with two novel species from Thailand. Phytotaxa 356:1−8

    doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.356.1.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Phukhamsakda C, Nilsson RH, Bhunjun CS, Gomes de Farias AR, Sun YR, et al. 2022. The numbers of fungi, contributions from traditional taxonomic studies and challenges of metabarcoding. Fungal Diversity 114:327−86

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-022-00502-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Samarakoon MC, Hyde KD, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Stadler M, Gareth Jones EB, et al. 2022. Taxonomy phylogeny molecular dating and ancestral state reconstruction of Xylariomycetidae (Sordariomycetes). Fungal Diversity 112:1−88

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-021-00495-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Saccardo PA. 1905. Sylloge Fungorum XVII. 569 pp

    [22]

    Vasilyeva LN, Rogers JD. 2010. Some new pyrenomycetous and loculoascomycetous fungi on the endemic Hawaiian plant Hibiscadelphus giffardianus. Mycotaxon 113:273−81

    doi: 10.5248/113.273

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Mehrabi M, Hemmati R, Vasilyeva LN, Trouillas FP. 2016. Diatrypella macrospora sp. nov. and new records of diatrypaceous fungi from Iran. Phytotaxa 252:43−55

    doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.252.1.4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Phookamsak R, Hyde KD, Jeewon R, Bhat DJ, Jones EB, et al. 2019. Fungal diversity notes 929–1035: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungi. Fungal Diversity 95:1−273

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-019-00421-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Dayarathne MC, Jones EBG, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Devadatha B, Sarma VV, et al. 2020. Morpho-molecular characterization of microfungi associated with marine based habitats. Mycosphere 11:1−188

    doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Lumbsch HT, Huhndorf SM. 2010. Myconet volume 14. Part One. Outline of Ascomycota–2009. Part two. Notes on Ascomycete systematics. Nos. 4751–5113. Fieldiana Life and Earth Sciences 1:1−64

    doi: 10.3158/1557.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Maharachchikumbura SSN, Hyde KD, Jones EBG, McKenzie EHC, Huang SK, et al. 2015. Towards a natural classification and backbone tree for Sordariomycetes. Fungal Diversity 72:199−301

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-015-0331-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Luo Z, Hyde KD, Liu J, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Jeewon R, et al. 2019. Freshwater Sordariomycetes. Fungal Diversity 99:451−660

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-019-00438-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Index Fungorum. 2022. www.indexfungorum.org/Names/Names.asp (Accessed on October 20, 2022).

    [30]

    Senanayake IC, Rathnayaka AR, Marasinghe DS, Calabon MS, Gentekaki E, et al. 2020. Morphological approaches in studying fungi: collection, examination, isolation, sporulation and preservation. Mycosphere 11:2678−754

    doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/20

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Jayasiri SC, Hyde KD, Ariyawansa HA, Bhat J, Buyck B, et al. 2015. The Faces of fungi database: fungal names linked with morphology, phylogeny and human impacts. Fungal Diversity 74:3−18

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-015-0351-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Du TY, Karunarathna SC, Hyde KD, Mapook A, Wariss HM, et al. 2022. The endophytic fungi of Aquilaria sinensis from southern China. Fungal Biotec 2:1−15

    Google Scholar

    [33]

    White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols, A Guide to Methods and Applications, eds. Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ. San Diego, California: Academic Press. pp. 315–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8 50042-1

    [34]

    Trouillas FP, Pitt WM, Sosnowski MR, Huang R, Peduto F, et al. 2011. Taxonomy and DNA phylogeny of Diatrypaceae associated with Vitis vinifera and other woody plants in Australia. Fungal Diversity 49:203−23

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-011-0094-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Dissanayake AJ, Bhunjun CS, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Liu JK. 2020. Applied aspects of methods to infer phylogenetic relationships amongst fungi. Mycosphere 11:2652−76

    doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/18

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30:772−80

    doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41:95−98

    Google Scholar

    [38]

    Glez-Peña D, Gómez-Blanco D, Reboiro-Jato M, Fdez-Riverola F, Posada D. 2010. ALTER, program-oriented conversion of DNA and protein alignments. Nucleic Acids Research 38:W14−W18

    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq321

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Proceedings of the gateway computing environments workshop (GCE), New Orleans, LA, USA, 2010. pp. 1–8. New Orleans, USA: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129

    [40]

    Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312−13

    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Systematic Biology 57:758−71

    doi: 10.1080/10635150802429642

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck J, Teslenko M. 2011. Draft MrBayes version 3.2. Manual, tutorials and model summaries. pp. 1−84

    [43]

    Rannala B, Yang Z. 1996. Probability distribution of molecular evolutionary trees, a new method of phylogenetic inference. Journal of Molecular Evolution 43:304−11

    doi: 10.1007/BF02338839

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Zhaxybayeva O, Gogarten JP. 2002. Bootstrap, Bayesian probability and maximum likelihood mapping, exploring new tools for comparative genome analyses. BMC Genomics 3:4

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-3-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Rambaut A. 2012. FigTree version 1 4, 2, University of Edinburgh Edinburgh.

    [46]

    Konta S, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Senanayake IC, McKenzie EHC, Stadler M, et al. 2020. A new genus Allodiatrype, five new species and a new host record of diatrypaceous fungi from palms (Arecaceae). Mycosphere 11:239−68

    doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Luque J, Garcia-Figueres F, Legorburu FJ, Muruamendiaraz A, Armengol J, et al. 2012. Species of Diatrypaceae associated with grapevine trunk diseases in Eastern Spain. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 51:528−40

    Google Scholar

    [48]

    Trouillas FP, Hand FP, Inderbitzin P, Gubler WD. 2015. The genus Cryptosphaeria in the Western United States: Taxonomy, multilocus phylogeny and a new species, C. multicontinentalis. Mycologia 107:1304−13

    doi: 10.3852/15-115

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Trouillas FP, Úrbez-Torres JR, Gubler WD. 2010. Diversity of diatrypaceous fungi associated with grapevine canker diseases in California. Mycologia 102:319−36

    doi: 10.3852/08-185

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Schoch CL, Robbertse B, Robert V, Vu D, Cardinali, G, et al. 2014. Finding needles in haystacks: linking scientific names, reference specimens and molecular data for Fungi. Database 2014:bau061

    doi: 10.1093/database/bau061

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Lynch SC, Eskalen A, Zambino PJ, Mayorquin JS, Wang DH. 2013. Identification and pathogenicity of Botryosphaeriaceae species associated with coast live oak (Quercus agrifolia) decline in southern California. Mycologia 105:125−40

    doi: 10.3852/12-047

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Grassi E, Belen Pildain M, Levin L, Carmaran C. 2014. Studies in Peroneutypa, the new species Eutypa microasca and investigation of ligninolytic enzyme production. Sydowia 66:99−114

    doi: 10.12905/0380sydowia66(1)2014-0099

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Arhipova N, Gaitnieks T, Donis J, Stenlid J, Vasaitis R. 2012. Heart-rot and associated fungi in Alnus glutinosa stands in Latvia. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 27:327−36

    doi: 10.1080/02827581.2012.670727

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Chacón S, Dörge D, Weisenborn J, Piepenbring M. 2013. A new species and a new record of Diatrypaceae from Panama. Mycologia 105:681−88

    doi: 10.3852/12-131

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Dayarathne MC, Phookamsak R, Hyde KD, Manawasinghe IS, To-anun C, et al. 2016. Halodiatrype, a novel diatrypaceous genus from mangroves with H. salinicola and H. avicenniae spp., nov. Mycosphere 7:612−27

    doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/7/5/7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Gaytán-Mascorro A, Chew-Madinaveitia YI, Pérez TH, Robles MAG. 2012. First report of Monosporascus cannonballus on watermelon in Northern Mexico. Plant Disease 96:1068

    doi: 10.1094/PDIS-02-12-0180-PDN

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Long S, Liu L, Pi Y, Wu Y, Li Q. 2021. New contributions to diatrypaceae from karst areas in China. MycoKeys 83:1−37

    doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.83.68926

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Klaysuban A, Sakayaroj J, Jones EBG. 2014. An additional marine fungal lineage in the Diatrypaceae Xylariales: Pedumispora rhizophorae. Botanica Marina 57:413−20

    doi: 10.1515/bot-2014-0017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Dai DQ, Phookamsak R, Wijayawardene NN, Li WJ, Bhat DJ, et al. 2017. Bambusicolous fungi. Fungal Diversity 82:1−105

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-016-0367-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Peršoh D, Melcher M, Graf K, Fournier J, Stadler M, et al. 2009. Molecular and morphological evidence for the delimitation of Xylaria hypoxylon. Mycologia 101:256−68

    doi: 10.3852/08-108

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Desmazières JBHJ. 1840. Notice sur quelques plantes cryptogames nouvelles découvertes en France, qui vont paraître en nature dans la collection publiée par l’auteur. Annales des Sciences Naturelles Botanique 13:181−90

    Google Scholar

    [62]

    Saccas AM. 1981. Étude de la Flore Cryptogamique des Caféirs en Afrique Centrale. Paris: Institut Français du Café et du Cacao (IFCC) 16. pp. 1−522

    [63]

    Brenckle JF. 1917. North Dakota fungi – I. Mycologia 9:275−93

    doi: 10.1080/00275514.1917.12018928

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Cooke MC, George M. 1880. Grevillea. Vol. 9. London: Williams and Norgate. 196 pp

    [65]

    Rehm H. 1914. Ascomycetes Philippinenses − VI. Leaflets of Philippine Botany 6:2257−81

    Google Scholar

    [66]

    Sydow H, Sydow P. 1910. Fungi Paraenses. Hedwigia 49:78−84

    Google Scholar

    [67]

    Saccardo PA. 1918. 1. Fungi Singaporenses Bakeriani. 2. Fungi Abellinenses novi. Bolletino dell’Orto Botanico Regia dell'Universita de Napoli 6:39−73

    Google Scholar

    [68]

    Mehrabi M, Asgari B, Hemmati R. 2019. Two new species of Eutypella and a new combination in the genus Peroneutypa (Diatrypaceae). Mycological Progress 18:1057−69

    doi: 10.1007/s11557-019-01503-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Saccas AM. 1954. Les champignons de l’Hévéa en Afrique Équatoriale Française. Journal d'Agriculture Tropicale et de Botanique Appliquée 1:461−81

    doi: 10.3406/jatba.1954.2183

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Moreau C, Moreau M. 1951. Pyrénomycètes du Caféier en Cote d'Ivoire. Revue de Mycologie (Paris) 16:66−72

    Google Scholar

    [71]

    Rieuf P, Teasca G. 1970. Fungi on avocado pear in Morocco. Al Awamia 34:47−90

    Google Scholar

    [72]

    Chevaugeon J. 1956. Les maladies cryptogamiques du manioc en Afrique Occidentale. Encyclopédie Mycologique 28:1−205

    Google Scholar

    [73]

    Petch T. 1922. Additions to Ceylon fungi II. Annals of the Royal Botanic Gardens Peradeniya 7:279−322

    Google Scholar

    [74]

    Farr DF, Rossman AY. 2022. Fungal Databases. U. S. National Fungus Collections, ARS, USDA. https://nt.ars-grin.gov/fungaldatabases

    [75]

    Turjaman M, Hidayat A, Santoso E. 2016. Development of agarwood induction technology using endophytic fungi. In Agarwood, Tropical Forestry, ed. Mohamed R. Singapore: Springer. pp. 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0833-7_4

    [76]

    Du TY, Dao CJ, Mapook A, Stephenson SL, Elgorban AM, et al. 2022. Diversity and biosynthetic activities of agarwood associated fungi. Diversity 14:211

    doi: 10.3390/d14030211

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Azren PD, Lee SY, Emang D, Mohamed R. 2019. History and perspectives of induction technology for agarwood production from cultivated Aquilaria in Asia: A review. Journal of Forestry Research 30:1−11

    doi: 10.1007/s11676-018-0627-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Subasinghe SMCUP, Hitihamu HID, Fernando KMEP. 2019. Use of two fungal species to induce agarwood resin formation in Gyrinops walla. Journal of Forestry Research 30:721−26

    doi: 10.1007/s11676-018-0654-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Du TY, Karunarathna SC, Zhang X, Dai DQ, Gao Y, et al. 2022. Morphology and multigene phylogeny revealed Peroneutypa aquilariae sp. nov. (Diatrypaceae, Xylariales) from Aquilaria sinensis in Yunnan Province, China. Studies in Fungi 7:18 doi: 10.48130/SIF-2022-0018
    Du TY, Karunarathna SC, Zhang X, Dai DQ, Gao Y, et al. 2022. Morphology and multigene phylogeny revealed Peroneutypa aquilariae sp. nov. (Diatrypaceae, Xylariales) from Aquilaria sinensis in Yunnan Province, China. Studies in Fungi 7:18 doi: 10.48130/SIF-2022-0018

Figures(2)  /  Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(3334) PDF downloads(640)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Morphology and multigene phylogeny revealed Peroneutypa aquilariae sp. nov. (Diatrypaceae, Xylariales) from Aquilaria sinensis in Yunnan Province, China

Studies in Fungi  7 Article number: 18  (2022)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Dead twigs of Aquilaria sinensis (Thymelaeaceae) with fungal fruiting bodies were collected from Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province, China. After initial morphological observations, an interesting fungus whose morphologically resembled Peroneutypa was isolated. Molecular phylogeny of combined ITS and tub2 showed our fungal collection is phylogenetically closely related to P. mackenziei. However, in morphology, our fungal collection is distinct from P. mackenziei in having an ostiolar canal without periphyses and the absence of paraphyses. Based on unique morphological characteristics and multigene phylogenetic analyses results, our fungal isolate is described in this paper as Peroneutypa aquilariae sp. nov. In addition, this is the first report of the genus Peroneutypa from the host A. sinensis. Full description, illustrations, and a phylogenetic tree to show the placement of the new species are provided. A synoptic table of morphological characteristics in Peroneutypa reported worldwide is also provided.

    • Sordariomycetes O.E. Erikss. & Winka, is the second largest class in Ascomycota Caval.-Sm., characterized by unitunicate asci and are widely distributed in almost all ecosystems as endophytes, pathogens, or saprobes[1]. Hyde et al.[1], accepted 45 orders, 167 families, 1,499 genera and 308 genera incertae sedis in Sordariomycetes, while in the latest outline by Wijayawardene et al.[2], the numbers were increased to 46 orders, 184 families, 1,594 genera and 346 genera incertae sedis. In Sordariomycetes, there are seven subclasses viz. Diaporthomycetidae Senan., Maharachch. & K.D. Hyde, Hypocreomycetidae O.E. Erikss. & Winka, Lulworthiomycetidae Dayar., E.B.G. Jones & K.D. Hyde, Pisorisporiomycetidae Bundhun, Maharachch. & K.D. Hyde, Savoryellomycetidae Hongsanan, K.D. Hyde & Maharachch., Sordariomycetidae O.E. Erikss & Winka, and Xylariomycetidae O.E. Erikss & Winka[2].

      Xylariales Nannf. is a large order and the only order in the subclass Xylariomycetidae which was accepted by Maharachchikumbura et al.[3] and later Amphispheriales and Xylariales were accepted in Xylariomycetidae by Samarakoon et al.[4] and Hongsanan et al.[5] based on phylogenetic analyses and divergence time estimations. Later, Delonicicolales R.H. Perera, Maharachch. & K.D. Hyde was introduced into Xylariomycetidae based on phylogenetic analyses by Perera et al.[6]. According to Wijayawardene et al.[2], currently, 20 families are listed in this order.

      Diatrypaceae Nitschke is one important family of higher ascomycetes that belongs to Xylariales[3]. Diatrypaceae was introduced by Nitschke[7] and is typified by Diatrype Fr. Diatrypaceae is characterized by perithecial black stroma, ascomata usually embedded in stroma, cylindric-clavate to clavate asci and allantoid ascospores in its sexual morph[812]. The asexual morph is characterized by coelomycetous; acervuli conidiomata, erumpent, with branched conidiophores, conidiogenous cells in dense palisades, cylindrical with filiform conidia, curved, flattened base, blunt apex, and hyaline[1,3]. Zhu et al.[13] showed that Diatrypaceae has high diversity, and the members of this family are usually wood inhabiting fungi in China. According to Wijayawardene et al.[2], currently, 22 genera are listed in this family.

      Peroneutypa Berl. was introduced by Berlese[14] to accommodate P. bellula (Desm.) Berl., P. corniculata (Ehrh.) Berl and P. heteracantha (Sacc.), without designating the type species until Rappaz[9] designated P. bellula as the type species and considered Peroneutypa as a synonym of Eutypella (Nitschke) Sacc. Later, based on morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analyses of Acero et al.[15], Carmarán et al.[16] resurrected Peroneutypa as an independent genus, and transferred eight species from Eutypella and Echinomyces Rappaz to Peroneutypa (viz: P. alsophila (Durieu & Mont.) Carmarán & A.I. Romero, P. arecae (Syd. & P. Syd.) Carmarán & A.I. Romero, P. comosa (Speg.) Carmarán & A.I. Romero, P. curvispora (Starbäck) Carmarán & A.I. Romero, P. gliricidiae (Rehm) Carmarán & A.I. Romero, P. kochiana (Rehm) Carmarán & A.I. Romero, P. scoparia (Schwein.) Carmarán & A.I. Romero and P. obesa (Syd. & P. Syd.) Carmarán & A.I. Romero). Later, based on molecular phylogenetic analyses, several studies have clarified that Peroneutypa is a monophyletic group in Diatrypaceae[12,1620]. Peroneutypa is characterized by poorly developed ascostromata, perithecia ascomata with long prominent necks, 8-spored, clavate asci with sessile to subsessile, and allantoid, hyaline or yellowish ascospores[11,12,1624]. Recently, a new species (P. polysporae Devadatha, V.V. Sarma & E.B.G. Jones) isolated from decaying wood of Suaeda monoica in India was introduced by Dayarathne et al.[25]. This species has polysporous asci which differ from the generic description (8-spored asci), thus this information shows that Peroneutypa can accommodate taxa with polysporous asci[25]. The members of Peroneutypa are known as saprobes or pathogens and are widely distributed in terrestrial and marine habitats[12,2528]. Currently, 35 species are recorded in Index Fungorum[29], with only 16 species having molecular data.

      In this study, a new species, Peroneutypa aquilariae is introduced based on morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analyses of combined ITS and tub2 gene sequences. To our knowledge, this is the first Peroneutypa species from an Aquilaria host. In addition, a synoptic table of morphological characteristics in Peroneutypa is also provided.

    • The dead twigs of Aquilaria sinensis with fungal fruiting bodies were collected from Xishuangbanna, Yunnan Province, China in autumn. The specimens were placed in plastic bags and brought to the mycology laboratory. Morphological structures were examined under an OPTEC SZ650 dissecting stereo-microscope. Fruiting bodies were picked up with needles, hand sectioned by razor blades and mounted on a glass slide with water. OLYMPUS optical microscope (Japan) was used to observe microscopic fungal structures and an OLYMPUS DP74 (Japan) digital camera fitted to the microscope was used to take photographs. All micromorphological structures were measured with Tarosoft® Image Framework program and photo plates were made using Adobe Photoshop CS3 Extended version 10.0 software (Adobe Systems, USA).

      Senanayake et al.[30] was followed for the single spore isolation under sterile conditions. Once the spores were germinated, clear photographs were taken using the camera microscope and the germinated spores were transferred to a new potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium with a sterilized needle, and then incubated at 28 °C. Culture characteristics on PDA were observed after one month. The fresh mycelia of the fungus were used for DNA extraction.

      The herbarium specimen was deposited in Kunming Institute of Botany Academia Sinica (HKAS), China, while the living cultures were deposited in Kunming Institute of Botany Culture Collection (KUNCC), China. Facesoffungi (FoF) was registered as described in Jayasiri et al.[31], and MycoBank number (MB) was registered as outlined in MycoBank (www.MycoBank.org).

    • Genomic DNA was extracted from fungal mycelium (from one-month old cultures) by using Biospin Fungus Genomic DNA Extraction Kit–BSC14S1 (BioFlux®, China) following the manufacturer's instructions. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to amplify two gene regions using primers following Shang et al.[12] and Dayarathne et al.[25], with some modifications (Table 1). The total volume of PCR mixtures for amplifications following Du et al.[32], 25 μL containing 12.5 μL 2x Master Mix (mixture of Easy Taq TM DNA Polymerase, dNTPs, and optimized buffer (Beijing Trans Gen Biotech Co., Chaoyang District, Beijing, China), 8.5 μL ddH2O, 2 μL of DNA template, 1 μL of each forward and reverse primers (10 pM). Purification and sequencing of PCR products were carried out by Qinke Biotech Co., Yunnan, China.

      Table 1.  The primers and thermal cycles of PCR used in this study.

      Gene/LocusPrimers
      (Forward/Reverse)
      Thermal cyclesReference
      Internal transcribed spacers (ITS)ITS5/ITS494 °C: 3 min, (94 °C: 30 s, 55 °C: 50 s, 72 °C: 90 s) × 35 cycles, 72 °C: 10 min, final 4 °C[33]
      β-tubulin (tub2)T1/Bt2b[34]
    • Dissanayake et al.[35] was followed for the phylogenetic analyses. The nucleotide BLAST search in GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) was used to select the most closely related taxa. The sequences of the closely related taxa to the new taxon, which were used in the phylogenetic analyses (Table 2) were obtained from GenBank based on recently published data[19,20]. Multi-gene phylogenetic analyses were carried out based on combined ITS and tub2 genes, including 82 sequences and two outgroup taxa (Xylaria atrosphaerica (Cooke & Massee) Callan & J.D. Rogers (AFTOL-ID 51) and Xylaria hypoxylon (L.) Grev. (CBS 122620)). Multiple alignments of these sequences were automatically made with MAFFT v. 7 at the web server (http://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server), using default settings[36]. Automatic cutting was done in trimAl.v1.2rev59, and manually combined the multiple sequences in BioEdit v. 7.0.5.2[37]. The multiple sequences were converted using ALTER (www.sing-group.org/ALTER/)[38].

      Table 2.  Species, strain numbers, and GenBank accession numbers used in the phylogenetic analyses.

      SpeciesStrain numberITStub2Reference
      Allocryptovalsa castaneaCFCC 52427MW632944[13]
      Allocryptovalsa castaneaCFCC 52428TMW632945[13]
      Allocryptovalsa castaneaCFCC 52429MW632946[13]
      Allocryptovalsa castaneicolaCFCC 52432TMW632947[13]
      Allocryptovalsa cryptovalsoideaHVFIG02THQ692573HQ692524[34]
      Allocryptovalsa cryptovalsoideaHVFIG05HQ692574HQ692525[34]
      Allocryptovalsa elaeidisMFLUCC 15-0707TMN308410MN340296[46]
      Allocryptovalsa polysporaMFLUCC 17-0364TMF959500MG334556[17]
      Allocryptovalsa rabenhorstiiWA07COHQ692620HQ692522[34]
      Allocryptovalsa rabenhorstiiWA08CBHQ692619HQ692523[34]
      Allocryptovalsa sichuanensisHKAS 107017TMW240633MW775592[20]
      Allocryptovalsa truncataPUFNI 17639TMK990279[1]
      Allodiatrype arengaeMFLUCC 15-0713TMN308411MN340297[46]
      Allodiatrype elaeidicolaMFLUCC 15-0737aTMN308415MN340299[46]
      Anthostoma decipiensJL567JN975370JN975407[47]
      Anthostoma decipiensIPV-FW349AM399021AM920693Unpublished
      Cryptosphaeria eunomiaCBS 216.87TKT425230KT425165[48]
      Cryptosphaeria eunomiaCBS 223.87KT425231KT425166[48]
      Cryptovalsa ampelinaA001GQ293901GQ293972[49]
      Cryptovalsa ampelinaDRO101GQ293902GQ293982[49]
      Diatrypasimilis australiensisATCC MYA-3540TNR111369[50]
      Diatrype disciformisGNA14KR605644[23]
      Diatrype disciformisMFLU 17-1549MW240629[20]
      Diatrypella elaeidisMFLUCC 15-0279MN308417MN340300[46]
      Diatrypella verruciformisUCROK1467JX144793JX174093[51]
      Eutypa lataRGA01HQ692614HQ692497[34]
      Eutypa lataEP18HQ692611HQ692501[34]
      Eutypa microascaBAFC: 51550TKF964566KF964572[52]
      Eutypa microascaBAFC: 51551KF964565KF964570[52]
      Eutypa microascaBAFC: 51556KF964567KF964571[52]
      Eutypella cerviculataM68JF340269[53]
      Eutypella semicircularisMP4669JQ517314[54]
      Halocryptovalsa salicorniaeMFLUCC 15-0185TMH304410MH370274[25]
      Halodiatrype avicenniaeMFLUCC 15-0953KX573916KX573931[55]
      Halodiatrype salinicolaMFLUCC 15-1277KX573915KX573932[55]
      Monosporascus cannonballusCMM3646JX971617[56]
      Monosporascus cannonballusATCC 26931TFJ430598Unpublished
      Neoeutypella baoshanensisHMAS:255436MH822887MH822888[24]
      Neoeutypella baoshanensisGMBC0052MW797106MW814878[57]
      Pedumispora rhizophoraeBCC44877KJ888853[58]
      Pedumispora rhizophoraeBCC44878KJ888854[58]
      Peroneutypa alsophilaEL58CAJ302467[15]
      Peroneutypa aquilariaeKUNCC 22-10817TOP454038OP572195This study
      Peroneutypa aquilariaeKUNCC 22-10818OP482262OP572196This study
      Peroneutypa comosaBAFC:393KF964568[52]
      Peroneutypa curvisporaHUEFS 136877KM396641[11]
      Peroneutypa diminutiascaMFLUCC 17-2144TMG873479MH316765[18]
      Peroneutypa diminutisporaHUEFS 192196TKM396647[11]
      Peroneutypa indicaNFCCI-4393MN061368MN431498[25]
      Peroneutypa kochianaEL53MAJ302462[15]
      Peroneutypa kunmingensisKUMCC 21-0001TMZ475070MZ490589[19]
      Peroneutypa leucaenaeMFLU 18-0816TMW240631MW775591[20]
      Peroneutypa longiascaMFLUCC 17-0371TMF959502MG334558[17]
      Peroneutypa mackenzieiMFLUCC 16-0072TKY283083KY706363[12]
      Peroneutypa mangroveiPUFD526TMG844286MH094409[24]
      Peroneutypa polysporaeNFCCI-4392MN061367MN431497[25]
      Peroneutypa scopariaMFLUCC 11-0615KU940152[59]
      Peroneutypa scopariaMFLUCC 17-2143MG873478MH316764[18]
      Quaternaria quaternataEL60CAJ302469[15]
      Quaternaria quaternataGNF13KR605645[23]
      Xylaria atrosphaericaAFTOL-ID 51DQ491487Unpublished
      Xylaria hypoxylonCBS 122620AM993141KX271279[60]
      The newly generated sequences are in black bold, superscripted 'T' indicates ex-type, and '–' indicates sequence unavailable.

      Randomized Accelerated Maximum Likelihood (RAxML) and Bayesian inference analyses (BI) were carried out in the CIPRES Science Gateway (www.phylo.org/portal2/login!input.action)[39]. The ML trees are performed via RAxML-HPC2 on XSEDE (8.2.12)[40,41] with GTR+I+G model of evolution and bootstrap supports were obtained by running 1000 pseudoreplicates. The BI tree was conducted by Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) in MrBayes (v3.2.a)[42] to evaluate posterior probabilities[43,44], and the best model was GTR+I+G. Six simultaneous Markov chains were run for one million generations, and trees were sampled every 100th generation. The first 20% of generated trees representing the burn-in phase of the analyses were discarded and the rest were used to calculate posterior probabilities (PP). The phylogenetic tree was visualized with FigTree v1.4.2 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/)[45], and bootstrap values were shown at the nodes, and edited by Microsoft Office PowerPoint 2010. The newly obtained alignments and phylogenetic trees were deposited in TreeBASE (https://treebase.org/treebase-web/user/submissionList.html, submission ID: 29758).

    • The phylogenetic trees obtained from RAxML and BI gave similar topologies. The RAxML analyses of the combined dataset yielded the best scoring tree (Fig. 1), with a final ML optimization likelihood value of –20,817.822757. The matrix had 1,187 distinct alignment patterns, with 54.28% of undetermined characters or gaps. Parameters for the GTR+I+G model of the combined ITS and tub2 were as follows: estimated base frequencies A = 0.219035, C = 0.277925, G = 0.235904, T = 0.267137; substitution rates AC = 0.957294, AG = 2.875562, AT = 1.254222, CG = 0.889850, CT = 3.867387, GT = 1.000000; proportion of invariable sites I = 0.174656; and gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.580597.

      Figure 1. 

      RAxML tree of Diatrypaceae based on a combined dataset of ITS and tub2 partial sequences. Bootstrap support values for maximum likelihood (ML) equal to or higher than 50% and bayesian posterior probability (BYPP) equal to or higher than 0.90 are indicated above the branches. Newly generated sequences are shown in red, while the type species are shown in bold black and red.

      The final RAxML tree is shown in Fig. 1, which shows that Peroneutypa is a monophyletic group in Diatrypaceae, and Peroneutypa aquilariae is well separated from other strains in Peroneutypa. Peroneutypa mackenziei Q.J. Shang, Phook. & K.D. Hyde (MFLUCC 16-0072) is phylogenetically closely related to P. aquilariae. In addition, strains of Eutypa microasca E. Grassi & Carmarán are grouped within Peroneutypa (Fig. 1).

    • Peroneutypa aquilariae T.Y. Du & Tibpromma, sp. nov. Fig. 2

      MycoBank number: MB845438; Facesoffungi number: FoF12744

      Etymology: named after the host genus, Aquilaria.

      Saprobic on dead twigs of Aquilaria sinensis (Thymelaeaceae). Sexual morph: Ascostromata 0.5–1.5 mm wide, well-developed interior, solitary to gregarious, mostly solitary, immersed, long ostiolar canal raised through host tissue, black, irregular in shape, arranged irregularly, 1–6 locules. Ascomata (excluding necks) 300–570 μm diam., perithecial, immersed in ascostromata, subglobose to globose, dark brown to black. Ostiolar canal 20–40 μm wide, without periphysis, filled with hyaline cells, with 200–300 μm long, cylindrical, straight, dark-brown to black necks. Peridium 35–70 μm wide, composed of outer layer thick-walled, dark brown to pale brown cells of textura angularis, and inner layer thin-walled, hyaline cells of textura prismatica. Paraphyses absent. Asci 15–20 × 5–7 µm ($\bar{\text {x}} $ = 18 × 6 μm, n = 20), unitunicate, 8-spored, clavate to cylindrical, thin-walled, short pedicellate or non-pedicellate, apically rounded to truncate with indistinct J-apical ring. Ascospores (5–)5.5–7(–7.5) × (1.6–)1.8–2.2 µm ($\bar{\text {x}} $ = 6 × 2 μm, n = 30), overlapping 1–3-seriate, hyaline to pale yellow, oblong to allantoid, slightly curved, aseptate, smooth-walled, with granules, ascospores turn yellow after being stained by Melzer's reagent. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

      Culture characteristics: Ascospores germinated on PDA within 24 h at a constant temperature incubator (28 °C). Colonies on PDA reaching 6 cm diam., after one week at 28 °C, mycelium white, flossy, circular with entire edge, with filiform margin. After one month, mycelium becomes white to light yellow from above and light brown to brown from below.

      Material examined: China, Yunnan Province, Xishuangbanna, on dead twigs of Aquilaria sinensis (Thymelaeaceae), 15 September 2021, Tianye Du, YNA3 (holotype, HKAS 124185; ex-type cultures, KUNCC 22-10817 = KUNCC 22-10818).

      Notes: The BLASTn search of ITS sequences of our strains is 87.67% similar to P. mackenziei (MFLUCC 16-0072, NR_154363). In the present phylogenetic analyses, our strains formed a sister branch with P. mackenziei (MFLUCC 16-0072) with a low bootstrap support (63% ML). However, they differ in morphological characteristics i.e. stromata of P. aquilariae have well-developed interior, ostiolar canal without periphyse, peridium inner layer comprises of 3–5 hyaline cell layers of textura prismatica, and paraphyses absent; while P. mackenziei has poorly developed interior stromata, ostiolar canal periphysate, peridium inner layer comprises 8–10 hyaline cell layers of textura angularis, and hamathecium is composed of paraphyses[12]. Furthermore, a comparison of ITS nucleotides between P. aquilariae and P. mackenziei (MFLUCC 16-0072) resulted in 13.8% differences (67/487 bp, without gaps), and 54.1% differences (173/320 bp, without gaps) respectively in tub2. Based on both morphological characteristics and multigene phylogenetic analyses results, we introduce Peroneutypa aquilariae as a distinct new species and this is the first report of Peroneutypa from Aquilaria sinensis. We also provide information about countries, hosts, and a comparison of morphological characteristics of Peroneutypa in Table 3.

      Table 3.  Morphological characteristics, host, and location information of Peroneutypa species.

      SpeciesAscostromataAscomataOstiolar canalPeridiumParaphysesAsciAscosporesCountriesHostsReferences
      P. alsophilaSlightly or well-developed, less than 1 mm longN/ANecks not prominentN/AN/AApical apparatus J+N/AArgelia, FranceArthrocnemum fruticosum[15,16]
      P. aquilariaeSlightly or well-developed,
      0.5–1.5 mm wide,
      1–6 locules
      300–570 μm (excluding necks)With 200–300 μm long necks, 20–40 μm wide, without periphysis35–70 μm wideAbsent18.3 × 5.8 μm, short pedicellate or non-pedicellate, J- apical ring, apically rounded to truncate6.3 × 2 μm,
      hyaline to pale
      yellow, oblong
      to allantoid
      ChinaAquilaria sinensisThis study
      P. bellulaImmersed, scatteredGloboseLong necksN/AN/AMinimum, 5–6-spored, hyalineOblong, with granulesN/AArundo donax[61]
      P. coffeae450–900 × 350–650 μmN/A700–1,500 × 80–100 μm20–25 μm wideN/A23–25 × 4–5 μm, pedicellate4.5–6 × 1–1.5 μm, allantoidCentral African RepublicCoffea robusta[62]
      P. comosaSlightly or well-developedN/ANecks very long, over 1 mm, prominentN/AN/AApical apparatus J+ / J−N/AArgentinaCeltis tala[16,52]
      P. corniculataMulti-ascomaN/AProminentN/AN/AN/AN/AAmericaPrunus melanocarpa[9,63]
      P. curvisporaPoorly-developed, 0.6–3 mm wide,
      22 ascomata per stroma
      300–700 μm wide400–800 μm long, prominentN/AAbsent9–16.5 × 4–6 μm, long pedicellate, apex truncate3–5 × 1–2 μm, allantoid,
      strongly curved
      BrazilUnidentified wood[11]
      P. cylindrica3–4 mm,
      8–10 locules
      1 mm1–2.5 mm longN/AAbsent10–20 × 4–5, clavate, pedicellate4–5 × 2, hyaline, curvedSouth AfricaUnidentified wood[64]
      P. cyphelioides1–3 mm300 μm1–2 mm longN/AN/A15 × 4–5 μm4 × 1 μm, allantoidPhilippinesStreblus asper[65]
      P. diminutiascaWith poorly-developed interior, 1.2–1.4 mm wide, 1–10 locules147–218 μm (excluding necks)193 × 48 μm wide, long neck, periphysate15–32 μm wide4–7 μm wide, dense, septate22 × 4 μm, long pedicellate, with a J− subapical ring, apically rounded to truncate4.2 × 1.7 μm, hyaline to pale
      yellowish, allantoid
      ThailandUnidentified wood[18]
      P. diminutisporaAbsent or with poorly-developed, isolated or in groups of up to seven400–700 μm200–400 μm longN/AAbsentLong pedicellate, with a J− apical rings, apex truncateAllantoid, slightly to moderately curved, yellowish in massBrazilUnidentified wood[11]
      P. discriminis1 mm200 μm1 mm longN/AN/A12–14 × 4 μm5–6 × 1.5–2 μmIndia, PhilippinesFicus racemosa, Macaranga tanarius, Streblus asper[65]
      P. exiguaN/AN/A500–700 μm longN/AN/A11–16 × 3–6 μm (sporiferous part)3–3.5 × 1–1.5 μmBrazilCitrus aurantium[66]
      P. gliricidiaeInterior of the stroma not developedN/ANecks not prominentN/AN/A10–16 µm, J+AllantoidPhilippinesGliricidia sepium[16]
      P. heteracanthoidesN/A300 μmN/AN/AAbsent16 × 3.5 μm3–4 × 1 μm, allantoid, hyaline, with granulesSingaporeCassiae sp., Heveae brasiliensis[67]
      P. indicaWell-developed375 × 202 µm100–250 µm wide, with moderate neck 100–350 µm long, periphysate15–35 µm wide1–2 µm42 × 3.5 µm,
      short pedicellate, apically rounded to truncate, with a J– apical ring
      5.5 × 1.3 µm, hyaline, straight to allantoid, light brown in massIndiaSuaeda monoica[25]
      P. iranica 0.5–2 mm, 3–16 locules 300–500 μm 40–120 μm, periphysate 30–55 μm wide Septate, hyaline 13.5 × 3.6 μm, with a J+ apical ring 3.6 × 1 μm, hyaline, allantoid Iran Wisteria sinensis [68]
      P. kochiana Interior of the stroma not developed N/A Necks not prominent N/A N/A 18–28 µm long, J+ Allantoid Russia, Spain Atriplex halimus [15,16]
      P. komonoensis N/A 250–450 × 200–350 μm 1–1.2 mm long N/A N/A 30–38 × 3.5–4 μm, long pedicellate 3–4 × 1–1.5 μm, allantoid French Equatorial Africa Hevea brasiliensis[69]
      P. kunmingensisAbsent or with poorly-developed interior260 × 317 μm (excluding neck)140 × 100 μm wide, long neck, periphysate30–60 μm wideSeptate, hyaline26 × 4.1 μm, straight or slight curved, hyaline, long pedicel up to 16 μm, with a J– apical ring4.2 × 1.3 μm, hyaline to pale grey, oblong to allantoidChinaUnidentified wood[19]
      P. leucaenaeN/A655 × 525 μm275–350 μm long neck, periphysate22–43 μm wide3.2–7 μm wide, wider at the base, long, septate,33 × 4.2 μm, pedicel 17–27 μm long, J+ apical ringYellowish-brown, ellipsoidal to
      cylindrical or elongate-allantoid
      ThailandLeucaena leucocephala[20]
      P. lignicola609–685 μm high, 1,196–1,246 μm, 4–6 locules448–662 × 355–445 μmLong neck62–92 μm wideN/A16 × 6 μm, sessile, hyaline6 × 2 μm, elongate-allantoid, straight to slightly curvedThailandOn decaying wood submerged in a freshwater stream[28]
      P. longiasca N/A 180–450 × 170–390 µm 20–50 μm wide, 190–440 μm long 14–47 μm wide N/A Short to long pedicellate, apically rounded to truncate with indistinct J– subapical ring 5.8 × 2 μm, hyaline, oblong to allantoid Thailand Hevea brasiliensis [17]
      P. mackenziei With poorly-developed interior, 1.2–2.2 mm wide, multi-ascoma 466 × 356 μm 265 × 100 μm, ostiolar canal with long neck, periphysate 45–65 μm wide 2.5–4.5 μm wide, dense, filamentous, aseptate, hyaline 17.7 × 4.2 μm, sessile, apically rounded to truncate, with a J– apical ring 5.6 × 1.6 μm, subhyaline to
      pale yellowish,
      elongate allantoid
      Thailand Unidentified wood [12]
      P. macroceras 600–1,500 × 500–650 μm N/A 1,500–2,500 × 100–120 μm N/A N/A 30–35 × 4–4.5 μm, long pedicellate 4–5 × 1.2–1.5 μm, allantoid Central African Republic Coffea robusta [62]
      P. macrorostrata 1,500–2,000 × 350–500 μm N/A N/A N/A N/A 25–30 × 4–5 μm, pedicellate 4–6 × 1.5–2 μm, allantoid French Equatorial Africa Hevea brasiliensis [69]
      P. mangrovei Absent or poorly-developed, up to four in groups 375 × 202 μm 50–85 μm wide, with moderate neck length 100–350 μm, periphysate 15–35 µm wide 1–2 μm wide, septate, longer than asci 17 × 3.5 μm, short pedicellate, apically rounded to truncate, with a J– apical ring Hyaline to pale yellow, straight to allantoid India Avicennia marina [24]
      P. multistromata 400–900 × 200–700 μm 270–450 × 200–300 μm N/A N/A Absent 30–40 × 3–5 μm, (sporiferous part: 14–18 μm), long pedicellate, 8-spored 3–4 × 0.75–1 μm, hyaline, allantoid Cote d'Ivoire Coffea canephora [70]
      P. obesa Slightly or well-developed, spiny or bristly appearance to the stromatic surface, black line present N/A Necks prominent N/A N/A N/A 3–7 µm long, strongly curved Argentina, Zaire Unidentified
      wood
      [16]
      P. perseae 500–700 × 300–500 μm,
      5–6 locules
      300–600 × 150–200 μm N/A N/A Absent 18–26 × 4–6.5 μm, 8-spored, hyaline 5–6 × 1.5–2 μm, hyaline Morocco Persea americana [71]
      P. philippinarum 2–3 locules 200 μm 300–1000 μm long N/A N/A 15 × 4–5 μm 4 × 1.5 μm, allantoid Philippines Streblus asper [65]
      P. polymorpha N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Cote d'Ivoire Manihot esculenta [72]
      P. polysporae N/A 286 × 223 µm 113 × 60 µm, periphysate 15–50 µm wide Septate, hyaline 113 × 12 µm, polysporous 9 × 1.8 µm, hyaline to pale yellow, allantoid India Suaeda monoica [25]
      P. rubiformis With poorly-developed interior, 1–1.4 mm wide, 1–10 locules 109 × 159 μm (excluding necks) 176 × 52 μm, roundish, prominent ostioles in the centre, rubus-like or star-like in shape, periphysate 20–25 μm wide 7–11 μm wide, septate, hyaline 50 × 5 μm, short pedicellate, apically rounded to truncate, with a J- subapical ring 4.3 × 1.6 μm, hyaline to pale yellowish, elongate-allantoid Thailand Unidentified wood [18]
      P. scoparia Not developed or with poorly-developed interior,1.2–2 mm wide, 4–8 locules 256 × 266 μm 441 × 105 μm,
      long necks,
      prominent, periphysate
      20–35 μm wide Septate, hyaline 22 × 4.5 μm, long pedicellate, apically rounded to truncate, with a J– subapical ring 4.1 × 1.5 μm, oblong to allantoid, sometimes slightly curved Argentina, Chile, Czech Republic, France, India, Iran, Italy, Paraguay, Sweden, Thailand Acer pseudoplatanus, Actinidia deliciosa, Avicennia marina, bamboo culms, Gleditsia sp., Juglans regia, Robinia pseudoacacia, Vaccinium corymbosum [16,18,25,59]
      P. variabilis N/A 400–500 μm 700–2500 × 100–200 μm N/A N/A 12–18 × 3 μm (sporiferous part), tapering pedicel 3–5 × 1.5–2 μm, greenish-hyaline, cylindric, curved Sri Lanka Unidentified herbaccous [73]
      Host and location information of taxa extracted from the listed references and Farr & Rossman[74]. The symbol “N/A" denotes no information available or not mentioned in given papers, and the new species is in black bold.

      Figure 2. 

      Peroneutypa aquilariae (HKAS 124185, holotype). (a)–(c) Appearance of ascomata on the substrate. (d) Section through an ascoma. (e)–(h) Asci, (g) ascus stained with Congo red reagent, (h) asci stained with Melzer’s reagent). (i) Ostiole. (j) Peridium. (k)–(n) Ascospores. (o) A germinating ascospore. (p), (q) Colony on PDA medium (after 7 d in culture). Scale bars: (d) = 300 μm, (e), (j) = 50 μm, (f), (g) = 10 μm, (h) = 20 μm, (i) = 30 μm, (k)–(o) = 5 μm.

    • The updated phylogenetic tree of this study shows that Peroneutypa is a monophyletic genus, with E. microasca strains clustered within Peroneutypa, and this also is consistent with the previous research results of de Almeida et al.[11], Senwanna et al.[17], and Phukhamsakda et al.[19]. Senwanna et al.[17] considered that E. microasca should be listed under Peroneutypa. Though we agree with them, fresh specimens of E. microasca need to be recollected in the future and transferred to Peroneutypa based on the evidence of morphological comparison and phylogenetic analyses.

      Previous studies have reported that it is difficult to distinguish the members of Diatrypaceae by morphology, and many taxa still lack molecular data, which undoubtedly make the classification of Diatrypaceae more difficult[11,17,18]. There are similar difficulties in Peroneutypa. At present, 35 species of Peroneutypa are listed, and only 16 of them have molecular data (Tables 2 & 3). In particular, P. lignicola Z.L. Luo, K.D. Hyde & H.Y. Su (MFLUCC 14-0040) was not included in the phylogenetic analyses of this study as this species has no ITS and tub2 gene sequences, and therefore, more fresh samples need to be collected in the future in order to supplement the known species with molecular data.

      In Peroneutypa, currently, only ten species have tub2 gene sequences. The nucleotide fragments were compared and the results showed that the tub2 sequences of the ten species were quite different. Even among different strains (MFLUCC 17-2143 and NFCCI-4396) of the same species P. scoparia, 9% nucleotide differences (31/344 bp, without gaps) were observed. This may lead to the long branches of most species of this genus in the phylogenetic trees. The reason for the large difference in tub2 sequence might be due to the fact that different primers were selected in different strains, viz. using primers Bt2a/Bt2b: P. indica Devadatha, V.V. Sarma & E.B.G. Jones (NFCCI-4393), P. mackenziei (MFLUCC 16-0072), P. mangrovei Devadatha & V.V. Sarma (PUFD526), P. polysporae (NFCCI-4392), and P. scoparia (MFLUCC 17-2143); using primers T1/Bt2b: P. diminutiasca Q.J. Shang, Phukhamsak & K.D. Hyde (MFLUCC 17-2144), P. kunmingensis (KUMCC 21-0001), P. longiasca Senwanna, Phookamsak & K.D. Hyde (MFLUCC 17-0371), P. rubiformis Q.J. Shang, Phukhamsak & K.D. Hyde (MFLUCC 17-2142), and P. scoparia (NFCCI-4396); and using primers T1/T22: P. leucaenae (MFLU 18-0816). On the other hand, we suppose the difference of tub2 might be the unique characteristics of this genus, thus the tub2 gene can be used as a good marker in phylogeny. However, this study suggests that researchers working on this genus should use the same tub2 primers for PCR amplification.

      In this study, no asexual morph of the new taxon was observed, but in Shang et al.[18], the asexual types of P. rubiformis and P. scoparia were made in photo plates and descriptions, with the main characteristics of pycnidial conidiomata, cylindrical conidiogenous cells, with holoblastic and hyaline conidia lunate to filiform, or fusiform, curved at the upper part, flattened at the base and blunt apex. The discovery of the asexual morph will be useful in the taxonomic identification of Peroneutypa in the future.

      Our new species is associated with the genus Aquilaria, which belongs to Thymelaeaceae and is famous for producing agarwood[32,75,76]. Agarwood is very expensive and has a wide range of uses worldwide[76]. At present, the production mechanism of agarwood is not clear, but fungi are considered to be involved in producing agarwood[77,78]. Therefore, it is necessary to study the fungi associated with agarwood, including the saprophytic fungi. Saprophytic fungi associated with Aquilaria are poorly studied and this study reports the first Peroneutypa species from an Aquilaria host. In the future, more fresh samples need to be collected for in-depth research on the fungal diversity of Aquilaria.

      • This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. NSFC 31760013, 31950410558, 32260004), and High-Level Talent Recruitment Plan of Yunnan Provinces ('Young Talents' Program). Tian-Ye Du thanks Mae Fah Luang University for the award of fee-less scholarship. Ausana Mapook thanks the Mae Fah Luang University Fund (Grant No. 651A16029), entitled 'Taxonomy, phylogeny, risk assessment, and potential impact of fungi on Siam weed in northern Thailand'. Shaun Pennycook is thanked for his assistance in selecting a species epithet for the new species.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2022 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (2)  Table (3) References (78)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Du TY, Karunarathna SC, Zhang X, Dai DQ, Gao Y, et al. 2022. Morphology and multigene phylogeny revealed Peroneutypa aquilariae sp. nov. (Diatrypaceae, Xylariales) from Aquilaria sinensis in Yunnan Province, China. Studies in Fungi 7:18 doi: 10.48130/SIF-2022-0018
    Du TY, Karunarathna SC, Zhang X, Dai DQ, Gao Y, et al. 2022. Morphology and multigene phylogeny revealed Peroneutypa aquilariae sp. nov. (Diatrypaceae, Xylariales) from Aquilaria sinensis in Yunnan Province, China. Studies in Fungi 7:18 doi: 10.48130/SIF-2022-0018

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return