Search
2022 Volume 1
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Cell signaling during drought and/or cold stress in cassava

More Information
  • Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) is a root crop significant in food security and various bio-industrial applications such as animal feed, modified starch, and biofuels. Drought and cold stress are two major factors limiting cassava production qualitatively and quantitatively, for which plants have evolved mechanisms to overcome the impact of these two stressors. In recent years, significant progress has been achieved in understanding the response mechanism of cassava plants to stress signals to tolerate the above stresses. In this review, core stress-signaling pathways, including transcription factor (TF)-related regulatory networks, plant hormone signaling, reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging, and non-coding RNA (ncRNA) and alternative splicing (AS) that modify gene expression levels in response to drought and/or cold stress in cassava, are summarized. Understanding these stress signaling and responses will increase our ability to improve the crops tolerance to multiple stresses for agricultural sustainability and food security for the growing world population.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Saeed F, Chaudhry UK, Bakhsh A, Raza A, Saeed Y, et al. 2022. Moving beyond DNA sequence to improve plant stress responses. Frontiers in Genetics 13:874648

    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.874648

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Pourkheirandish M, Golicz AA, Bhalla PL, Singh MB. 2020. Global role of crop genomics in the face of climate change. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:922

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00922

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Olsen KM, Schaal BA. 1999. Evidence on the origin of cassava: phylogeography of Manihot esculenta. PNAS 96:5586−91

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.10.5586

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Malik AI, Kongsil P, Nguyễn VA, Ou W, Sholihin, et al. 2020. Cassava breeding and agronomy in Asia: 50 years of history and future directions. Breeding Science 70:145−66

    doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.18180

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Li S, Cui Y, Zhou Y, Luo Z, Liu J, et al. 2017. The industrial applications of cassava: current status, opportunities and prospects. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 97:2282−90

    doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8287

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Soto JC, Ortiz JF, Perlaza-Jiménez L, Vásquez AX, Lopez-Lavalle LAB, et al. 2015. A genetic map of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) with integrated physical mapping of immunity-related genes. BMC Genomics 16:190

    doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1397-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Jarvis A, Ramirez-Villegas J, Herrera Campo BV, Navarro-Racines C. 2012. Is cassava the answer to African climate change adaptation. Tropical Plant Biology 5:9−29

    doi: 10.1007/s12042-012-9096-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Howeler R, Lutaladio N, Thomas G. 2013. Save and grow: Cassava. A guide to sustainable production intensification. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 142 pp.

    [9]

    Wang W, Feng B, Xiao J, Xia Z, Zhou X, et al. 2014. Cassava genome from a wild ancestor to cultivated varieties. Nature Communications 5:5110

    doi: 10.1038/ncomms6110

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Zhao P, Liu P, Shao J, Li C, Wang B, et al. 2015. Analysis of different strategies adapted by two cassava cultivars in response to drought stress: ensuring survival or continuing growth. Journal of Experimental Botany 66:1477−88

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru507

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    An D, Yang J, Zhang P. 2012. Transcriptome profiling of low temperature-treated cassava apical shoots showed dynamic responses of tropical plant to cold stress. BMC Genomics 13:64

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-64

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    An F, Li G, Li QX, Li K, Carvalho LJCB, et al. 2016. The Comparatively Proteomic Analysis in Response to Cold Stress in Cassava Plantlets. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 34:1095−110

    doi: 10.1007/s11105-016-0987-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Hu W, Ji C, Liang Z, Ye J, Ou W, et al. 2021. Resequencing of 388 cassava accessions identifies valuable loci and selection for variation in heterozygosity. Genome Biology 22:316

    doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02524-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Hu W, Ji C, Shi H, Liang Z, Ding Z, et al. 2021. Allele-defined genome reveals biallelic differentiation during cassava evolution. Molecular Plant 14:851−54

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2021.04.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Boyer JS. 1982. Plant productivity and environment. Science 218:443−48

    doi: 10.1126/science.218.4571.443

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Zhu J. 2016. Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell 167:313−24

    doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.029

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Pereira LFM, Santos HL, Zanetti S, de Oliveira Brito IA, Tozin LRdS, et al. 2022. Morphology, biochemistry, and yield of cassava as functions of growth stage and water regime. South African Journal of Botany 149:222−39

    doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2022.06.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Santisopasri V, Kurotjanawong K, Chotineeranat S, Piyachomkwan K, Sriroth K, et al. 2001. Impact of water stress on yield and quality of cassava starch. Industrial Crops and Products 13:115−129

    doi: 10.1016/S0926-6690(00)00058-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    El-Sharkawy MA. 2004. Cassava biology and physiology. Plant Molecular Biology 56:481−501

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-005-2270-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Lenis JI, Calle F, Jaramillo G, Perez JC, Ceballos H, et al. 2006. Leaf retention and cassava productivity. Field Crops Research 95:126−34

    doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.02.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Okogbenin E, Setter TL, Ferguson M, Mutegi R, Ceballos H, et al. 2013. Phenotypic approaches to drought in cassava: review. Frontiers in Physiology 4:93

    doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00093

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Yan Y, Wang P, Lu Y, Bai Y, Wei Y, et al. 2021. MeRAV5 promotes drought stress resistance in cassava by modulating hydrogen peroxide and lignin accumulation. The Plant Journal 107:847−60

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.15350

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Alves AA, Setter TL. 2004. Response of cassava leaf area expansion to water deficit: cell proliferation, cell expansion and delayed development. Annals of Botany 94:605−13

    doi: 10.1093/aob/mch179

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Wei Y, Liu W, Hu W, Yan Y, Shi H. 2020. The chaperone MeHSP90 recruits MeWRKY20 and MeCatalase1 to regulate drought stress resistance in cassava. New Phytologist 226:476−91

    doi: 10.1111/nph.16346

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Li S, Cheng Z, Li Z, Dong S, Yu X, et al. 2022. MeSPL9 attenuates drought resistance by regulating JA signaling and protectant metabolite contents in cassava. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 135:817−32

    doi: 10.1007/s00122-021-04000-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Avila LM, Obeidat W, Earl H, Niu X, Hargreaves W, et al. 2018. Shared and genetically distinct Zea mays transcriptome responses to ongoing and past low temperature exposure. BMC Genomics 19:761

    doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-5134-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    El-Sharkawy MA. 2006. International research on cassava photosynthesis, productivity, eco-physiology, and responses to environmental stresses in the tropics. Photosynthetica 44:481−512

    doi: 10.1007/s11099-006-0063-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Zeng C, Ding Z, Zhou F, Zhou Y, Yang R, et al. 2017. The discrepant and similar responses of genome-wide transcriptional profiles between drought and cold stresses in cassava. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 18:2668

    doi: 10.3390/ijms18122668

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Li S, Yu X, Cheng Z, Yu X, Ruan M, et al. 2017. Global gene expression analysis reveals crosstalk between response mechanisms to cold and drought stresses in cassava seedlings. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:1259

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01259

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Feng R, Ren M, Lu L, Peng M, Guan X, et al. 2019. Involvement of abscisic acid-responsive element-binding factors in cassava (Manihot esculenta) dehydration stress response. Scientific Reports 9:12661

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-49083-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Fan W, Hai M, Guo Y, Ding Z, Tie W, et al. 2016. The ERF transcription factor family in cassava: genome-wide characterization and expression analyses against drought stress. Scientific Report 6:37379

    doi: 10.1038/srep37379

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Wu C, Hu W, Yan Y, Tie W, Ding Z, et al. 2018. The late embryogenesis abundant protein family in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz): Genome-wide characterization and expression during abiotic stress. Molecules 23:1196

    doi: 10.3390/molecules23051196

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Wei Y, Shi H, Xia Z, Tie W, Ding Z, et al. 2016. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the WRKY gene family in cassava. Frontiers In Plant Science 7:25

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00025

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Liao W, Li Y, Yang Y, Wang G, Peng M. 2016. Exposure to various abscission-promoting treatments suggests substantial ERF subfamily transcription factors involvement in the regulation of cassava leaf abscission. BMC Genomics 17:538

    doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2845-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Hu W, Wei Y, Xia Z, Yan Y, Hou X, et al. 2015. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the NAC transcription factor family in cassava. PLoS One 10:e0136993

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0136993

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Ding Z, Fu L, Yan Y, Tie W, Xia Z, et al. 2017. Genome-wide characterization and expression profiling of HD-Zip gene family related to abiotic stress in cassava. PLoS One 12:e0173043

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173043

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Hu W, Yang H, Yan Y, Wei Y, Tie W, et al. 2016. Genome-wide characterization and analysis of bZIP transcription factor gene family related to abiotic stress in cassava. Scientific Reports 6:22783

    doi: 10.1038/srep22783

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Akhtar M, Jaiswal A, Taj G, Jaiswal JP, Qureshi MI, et al. 2012. DREB1/CBF transcription factors: their structure, function and role in abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Journal of Genetics 91:385−95

    doi: 10.1007/s12041-012-0201-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    An D, Ma Q, Wang H, Yang J, Zhou W, et al. 2017. Cassava C-repeat binding factor 1 gene responds to low temperature and enhances cold tolerance when overexpressed in Arabidopsis and cassava. Plant Molecular Biology 94:109−24

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-017-0596-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Yang Y, Liao W, Yu X, Wang B, Peng M, et al. 2016. Overexpression of MeDREB1D confers tolerance to both drought and cold stresses in transgenic Arabidopsis. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 38:243

    doi: 10.1007/s11738-016-2258-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Cheng Z, Lei N, Li S, Liao W, Shen J, et al. 2019. The regulatory effects of MeTCP4 on cold stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana: A transcriptome analysis. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 138:9−16

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.02.015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Ruan M, Guo X, Wang B, Yang Y, Li W, et al. 2017. Genome-wide characterization and expression analysis enables identification of abiotic stress-responsive MYB transcription factors in cassava (Manihot esculenta). Journal of Experimental Botany 68:3657−72

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx202

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Yan Y, Liu W, Wei Y, Shi H. 2020. MeCIPK23 interacts with Whirly transcription factors to activate abscisic acid biosynthesis and regulate drought resistance in cassava. Plant Biotechnology Journal 18:1504−6

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.13321

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Liu J, Chen X, Wang S, Wang Y, Ouyang Y, et al. 2019. MeABL5, an ABA insensitive 5-like basic leucine zipper transcription factor, positively regulates MeCWINV3 in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Frontiers in Plant Science 10:772

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00772

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Waititu JK, Zhang C, Liu J, Wang H. 2020. Plant Non-Coding RNAs: Origin, Biogenesis, Mode of Action and Their Roles in Abiotic Stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21:8401

    doi: 10.3390/ijms21218401

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Chand Jha U, Nayyar H, Mantri N, Siddique KHM. 2021. Non-coding RNAs in legumes: their emerging roles in regulating biotic/abiotic stress responses and plant growth and development. Cells 10:1674

    doi: 10.3390/cells10071674

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Zeng C, Wang W, Zheng Y, Chen X, Bo W, et al. 2010. Conservation and divergence of microRNAs and their functions in Euphorbiaceous plants. Nucleic Acids Research 38:981−995

    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp1035

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Ballén-Taborda C, Plata G, Ayling S, Rodríguez-Zapata F, Becerra Lopez-Lavalle LA, et al. 2013. Identification of cassava microRNAs under abiotic stress. International Journal of Genomics 2013:857986

    doi: 10.1155/2013/857986

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Xia J, Zeng C, Chen Z, Zhang K, Chen X, et al. 2014. Endogenous small-noncoding RNAs and their roles in chilling response and stress acclimation in Cassava. BMC Genomics 15:634

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-634

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Li S, Cheng Z, Peng M. 2020. Genome-wide identification of miRNAs targets involved in cold response in cassava. Plant Omics Journal 13:57−64

    doi: 10.21475/POJ.13.01.20.p2337

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Patanun O, Lertpanyasampatha M, Sojikul P, Viboonjun U, Narangajavana J. 2012. Computational identification of microRNAs and their targets in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz.). Molecular Biotechnology 53:257−69

    doi: 10.1007/s12033-012-9521-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Lei N, Yu X, Li S, Zeng C, Zou L, et al. 2017. Phylogeny and expression pattern analysis of TCP transcription factors in cassava seedlings exposed to cold and/or drought stress. Scientific Reports 7:10016

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09398-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Khatabi B, Arikit S, Xia R, Winter S, Oumar D, et al. 2016. High-resolution identification and abundance profiling of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz.) microRNAs. BMC Genomics 17:85

    doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2391-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Rogans SJ, Rey C. 2016. Unveiling the Micronome of Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). PLoS One 11:e0147251

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147251

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Zeng C, Xia J, Chen X, Zhou Y, Peng M, et al. 2017. MicroRNA-like RNAs from the same miRNA precursors play a role in cassava chilling responses. Scientific Reports 7:17135

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-16861-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Zeng C, Chen Z, Xia J, Zhang K, Chen X, et al. 2014. Chilling acclimation provides immunity to stress by altering regulatory networks and inducing genes with protective functions in cassava. BMC Plant Biology 14:207

    doi: 10.1186/s12870-014-0207-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Li S, Cheng Z, Dong S, Li Z, Zou L, et al. 2022. Global identification of full-length cassava lncRNAs unveils the role of cold-responsive intergenic lncRNA 1 in cold stress response. Plant, Cell & Environment 45:412−26

    doi: 10.1111/pce.14236

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Xiao L, Shang XH, Cao S, Xie XY, Zeng WD, et al. 2019. Comparative physiology and transcriptome analysis allows for identification of lncRNAs imparting tolerance to drought stress in autotetraploid cassava. BMC Genomics 20:514

    doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5895-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Ding Z, Tie W, Fu L, Yan Y, Liu G, et al. 2019. Strand-specific RNA-seq based identification and functional prediction of drought-responsive lncRNAs in cassava. BMC Genomics 20:214

    doi: 10.1186/s12864-019-5585-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Li S, Yu X, Lei N, Cheng Z, Zhao P, et al. 2017. Genome-wide identification and functional prediction of cold and/or drought-responsive lncRNAs in cassava. Scientific Reports 7:45981

    doi: 10.1038/srep45981

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Suksamran R, Saithong T, Thammarongtham C, Kalapanulak S. 2020. Genomic and transcriptomic analysis identified novel putative cassava lncRNAs involved in cold and drought stress. Genes 11:366

    doi: 10.3390/genes11040366

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Ding Z, Wu C, Tie W, Yan Y, He G, et al. 2019. Strand-specific RNA-seq based identification and functional prediction of lncRNAs in response to melatonin and simulated drought stresses in cassava. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 140:96−104

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.05.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Dong S, Xiao L, Li Z, Shen J, Yan H, et al. 2022. A novel long non-coding RNA, DIR, increases drought tolerance in cassava by modifying stress-related gene expression. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 21:2588−602

    doi: 10.1016/j.jia.2022.07.022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Golldack D, Li C, Mohan H, Probst N. 2014. Tolerance to drought and salt stress in plants: Unraveling the signaling networks. Frontiers in Plant Science 5:151

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00151

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Sah SK, Reddy KR, Li J. 2016. Abscisic Acid and Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Crop Plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:571

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00571

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Ou W, Mao X, Huang C, Tie W, Yan Y, et al. 2018. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the kup family under abiotic stress in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). Frontiers in Physiology 9:17

    doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Liao W, Yang Y, Li Y, Wang G, Peng M. 2016. Genome-wide identification of cassava R2R3 MYB family genes related to abscission zone separation after environmental-stress-induced abscission. Scientific Reports 6:32006

    doi: 10.1038/srep32006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Shang S, Wu C, Huang C, Tie W, Yan Y, et al. 2018. Genome-wide analysis of the GRF family reveals their involvement in abiotic stress response in cassava. Genes 9:110

    doi: 10.3390/genes9020110

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Ruan M, Yang Y, Li K, Guo X, Wang B, et al. 2018. Identification and characterization of drought-responsive CC-type glutaredoxins from cassava cultivars reveals their involvement in ABA signalling. BMC Plant Biology 18:329

    doi: 10.1186/s12870-018-1528-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Hu W, Xia Z, Yan Y, Ding Z, Tie W, et al. 2015. Genome-wide gene phylogeny of CIPK family in cassava and expression analysis of partial drought-induced genes. Frontiers in Plant Science 6:914

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00914

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Fu L, Ding Z, Han B, Hu W, Li Y, et al. 2016. Physiological investigation and transcriptome analysis of Polyethylene Glycol (PEG)-induced dehydration stress in cassava. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17:283

    doi: 10.3390/ijms17030283

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Cao P, Liu X, Guo J, Chen Y, Li S, et al. 2019. Genome-wide analysis of dynamin gene family in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) and transcriptional regulation of family members ARC5 in hormonal treatments. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20:5094

    doi: 10.3390/ijms20205094

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Li S, Cao P, Wang C, Guo J, Zang Y, et al. 2021. Genome-wide analysis of tubulin gene family in cassava and expression of family member FtsZ2-1 during Various stress. Plants 7103:668

    doi: 10.3390/plants10040668

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74]

    Wang B, Li S, Zou L, Guo X, Liang J, et al. 2022. Natural variation MeMYB108 associated with tolerance to stress-induced leaf abscission linked to enhanced protection against reactive oxygen species in cassava. Plant Cell Reports 41:1573−87

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-022-02879-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75]

    Liao W, Li S, Lu C, Peng M. 2018. Tau GSTs involved in regulation of leaf abscission by comparison the gene profiling of MeGSTs in various abscission-promoting treatments in cassava abscission zones. BMC Genetics 19:45

    doi: 10.1186/s12863-018-0627-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Apel K, Hirt H. 2004. Reactive oxygen species: metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annual Review of Plant Biology 55:373−99

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.55.031903.141701

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Liao W, Wang G, Li Y, Wang B, Zhang P, et al. 2016. Reactive oxygen species regulate leaf pulvinus abscission zone cell separation in response to water-deficit stress in cassava. Scientific Reports 6:21542

    doi: 10.1038/srep21542

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Xu J, Duan X, Yang J, Beeching JR, Zhang P. 2013. Coupled expression of Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase and catalase in cassava improves tolerance against cold and drought stresses. Plant Signaling & Behavior 8:e24525

    doi: 10.4161/psb.24525

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Xu J, Yang J, Duan X, Jiang Y, Zhang P. 2014. Increased expression of native cytosolic Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase and ascorbate peroxidase improves tolerance to oxidative and chilling stresses in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). BMC Plant Biology 14:208

    doi: 10.1186/s12870-014-0208-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80]

    Wang P, Yan Y, Bai Y, Dong Y, Wei Y, et al. 2021. Phosphorylation of RAV1/2 by KIN10 is essential for transcriptional activation of CAT6/7, which underlies oxidative stress response in cassava. Cell Reports 37:110119

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.110119

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Yang X, Jia Z, Pu Q, Tian Y, Zhu F, et al. 2022. ABA mediates plant development and abiotic stress via alternative splicing. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23:3796

    doi: 10.3390/ijms23073796

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    Martín G, Márquez Y, Mantica F, Duque P, Irimia M. 2021. Alternative splicing landscapes in Arabidopsis thaliana across tissues and stress conditions highlight major functional differences with animals. Genome Biology 22:35

    doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02258-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Reddy ASN. 2007. Alternative splicing of pre-messenger RNAs in plants in the genomic era. Annual Review of Plant Biology 58:267−94

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.58.032806.103754

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Ganie SA, Reddy ASN. 2021. Stress-Induced changes in alternative splicing landscape in rice: functional significance of splice isoforms in stress tolerance. Biology 10:309

    doi: 10.3390/biology10040309

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Punzo P, Grillo S, Batelli G. 2020. Alternative splicing in plant abiotic stress responses. Biochemical Society Transactions 48:2117−26

    doi: 10.1042/BST20200281

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86]

    Liu Z, Qin J, Tian X, Xu S, Wang Y, et al. 2017. Global profiling of alternative splicing landscape responsive to drought, heat and their combination in wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Plant Biotechnology Journal 16:714−26

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.12822

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87]

    Song L, Pan Z, Chen L, Dai Y, Wan J, et al. 2020. Analysis of whole transcriptome RNA-seq data reveals many alternative splicing events in soybean roots under drought stress conditions. Genes 11:1520

    doi: 10.3390/genes11121520

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88]

    Li S, Yu X, Cheng Z, Zeng C, Li W, et al. 2020. Large-scale analysis of the cassava transcriptome reveals the impact of cold stress on alternative splicing. Journal of Experimental Botany 71:422−34

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz444

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Barta A, Kalyna M, Reddy ASN. 2010. Implementing a rational and consistent nomenclature for serine/arginine-rich protein splicing factors (SR proteins) in plants. The Plant Cell 22:2926−2929

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.078352

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Weng X, Zhou X, Xie S, Gu J, Wang Z. 2021. Identification of cassava alternative splicing-related genes and functional characterization of MeSCL30 involvement in drought stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 160:130−42

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.01.016

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91]

    Chen Y, Weng X, Zhou X, Gu J, Hu Q, et al. 2021. Overexpression of cassava RSZ21b enhances drought tolerance in Arabidopsis. Journal of Plant Physiology 268:153574

    doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2021.153574

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92]

    Albaqami M, Laluk K, Reddy ASN. 2019. The Arabidopsis splicing regulator SR45 confers salt tolerance in a splice isoform-dependent manner. Plant Molecular Biology 100:379−90

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-019-00864-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Li S, Zhao P, Yu X, Liao W, Peng M, et al. 2022. Cell signaling during drought and/or cold stress in cassava. Tropical Plants 1:6 doi: 10.48130/TP-2022-0006
    Li S, Zhao P, Yu X, Liao W, Peng M, et al. 2022. Cell signaling during drought and/or cold stress in cassava. Tropical Plants 1:6 doi: 10.48130/TP-2022-0006

Figures(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(3536) PDF downloads(665)

REVIEW   Open Access    

Cell signaling during drought and/or cold stress in cassava

Tropical Plants  1 Article number: 6  (2022)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) is a root crop significant in food security and various bio-industrial applications such as animal feed, modified starch, and biofuels. Drought and cold stress are two major factors limiting cassava production qualitatively and quantitatively, for which plants have evolved mechanisms to overcome the impact of these two stressors. In recent years, significant progress has been achieved in understanding the response mechanism of cassava plants to stress signals to tolerate the above stresses. In this review, core stress-signaling pathways, including transcription factor (TF)-related regulatory networks, plant hormone signaling, reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging, and non-coding RNA (ncRNA) and alternative splicing (AS) that modify gene expression levels in response to drought and/or cold stress in cassava, are summarized. Understanding these stress signaling and responses will increase our ability to improve the crops tolerance to multiple stresses for agricultural sustainability and food security for the growing world population.

    • Agriculture is essential in supplying fiber, fuel, and food for the rapidly growing population globally. In recent decades, the world population has increased tremendous pressure on agricultural crop production systems[1,2]. Moreover, climate change, such as drought and cold, have resulted in abiotic stresses, posing threats to crop production worldwide. Under drought and cold stresses, crops suffer various degrees of damage and huge yield losses[2]. Therefore, food security is a growing challenge facing humankind worldwide. In this respect, the improvement and expansion of crop varieties suited to grow under limited water resources and extreme temperatures are the keys to ensuring food security.

      Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) is an indispensable food and cash crop for resource-limited farmers in tropical and subtropical regions worldwide[3]. It represents an essential source of calories for more than one billion people, making it important for food security and economic development[4]. With multiple applications, cassava is used for human food or animal feed and as an industrial raw material, mainly owing to its low-cost, multi-purpose starch[5,6]. Although cassava tolerates low-fertility soil conditions and presents high productivity of starchy roots, this crop could be one of the optimum alternatives to provide food for the rapidly growing world population in the future[7,8]. However, drought and cold stressors lessen the yields of hardy crops like cassava. Currently, advancements in genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics have been made in understanding the mechanisms of cassava evolution, root development, and abiotic and biotic stress tolerance[914]. This review focuses on recent advances in exploring cellular signaling networks of cassava plants against cold and drought stress and provides guidance for future research, which is expected to accelerate the production of drought/cold-tolerant varieties through genetic transformation or molecular breeding.

    • Climate change leads to more frequent and/or extreme drought events in many agricultural regions globally. It has been reported that water deficiency caused drought stress is the major environmental stress limiting crop productivity, leading to over 70% of potential agriculture yield losses worldwide[15]. Overall, drought stress results in suppressed plant growth, reduced photosynthetic rates, accelerated leaf senescence, and intensified oxidative damage in plants[16] (Fig. 1a). The cassava growth cycle, especially the earlier stages (within 30−150 d after planting), is typically interrupted by drought, thus depressing growth, development, and economic yield[17,18]. The physiological responses of cassava plants to drought stress have been reported[19,20]. Cassava plants have evolved diverse mechanisms, such as drought avoidance in response to water stress. Once exposed to dry air and/or soils, cassava plants conserve water by closing stomata, restricting new leaf formation, and leaf drooping and defoliation, further decreasing the leaf canopy (as reflected in the production of fewer and smaller leaves) to reduce plant’s overall water usage, and enhancing water uptake by increasing root length under prolonged water stress[19]. Upon recovering from drought stress, cassava can rapidly form new leaves[21]. At the same time, a range of small molecule compounds such as proline, soluble sugars, lignin, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) are accumulated to maintain the cellular water content under drought stress[22]. Plant hormones, e.g., abscisic acid (ABA), jasmonates (JA), and ethylene (ETH), play an essential role in plant drought stress signaling as well as the control of leaf development and senescence, stomatal movements, and root growth[21]. Several studies showed that ABA and JA levels were strongly increased in cassava plants under drought conditions[2325].

      Figure 1. 

      A simplified diagrammatic representation of (a) physiological phenotypes and (b) cell signaling of cassava plants under drought and/or cold stress. AS, alternative splicing; ncRNAs, non-coding RNAs; TFs, transcription factors; ROS, reactive oxygen species; JA, jasmonates; ETH, ethylene; ABA, abscisic acid.

      Cold stress, including freezing (< 0 °C) and chilling (0−15 °C) stress, causes tremendous changes in the physiology, biochemistry, and development of plants, especially the geographical distribution[16]. Freezing and chilling temperatures exert preliminary effects on cell membrane fluidity and enzyme activities, thereby impacting various cellular processes[16]. They also chronically influence the abundance of RNA and protein at the transcriptional or translational level[26]. Because cassava plants grow natively in tropical regions, they are highly sensitive to low temperatures and cannot survive long under freezing conditions[27]. Cassava seedlings exposed to cold stress (e.g., temperatures below 15 °C but above 0 °C) cease growth with dehydrated leaves. Under prolonged exposure to stress, the whole plant exhibits obvious phenotypic damages, including loss of strength in immature stems, softening and downward bending of petioles, and low photosynthetic rate[11] (Fig. 1a). In addition, exposure to cold will also increase the levels of proline, malondialdehyde (MDA), soluble sugars, and ROS in cassava plants[11]. Conversely, the content of chlorophyll significant for the absorption and conversion of light energy is reduced under cold stress[12].

    • Recent advances showed that cassava plants have developed various mechanisms to cope with drought and/or cold stresses, including changes at physiological and molecular levels, altering the expression level of stress-associated genes and leading to the formation of various protectant metabolites[11,28,29]. These genes and metabolites play significant roles in stress tolerance via detrimental cellular change prevention, water retention of plant cells, cellular membrane stabilization, and protein or RNA structure protection under drought and cold stresses. Among them, the primary features are described in the following sections.

    • As the molecular switches for controlling downstream target gene expression by promoting/suppressing messenger RNA (mRNA) transcription, TFs regulate to a large extent plant growth and biotic/abiotic stress responses. To date, a great deal of TFs of different families, e.g., myeloblastosis (MYB), basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH), growth-regulating factor (GRF), WRKY, dehydration responsive element binding (DREB), APETALA2/ethylene responsive factor (AP2/ERF), basic leucine zipper (bZIP), homeodomain leucine zipper (HD-ZIP), NAC, and ABRE-binding factor (ABF), have been identified to be associated with the drought and/or cold stress response in cassava plants based on genome-wide analysis[28,3037]. DREBs play a central role in improving drought and cold stress tolerance in various plant species by binding a DRE/CRT cis-element in the promoter regions of target genes[38]. Two DREB homologous genes, i.e., MeDREB1A and MeDREB1D, are functionally characterized in cassava[39,40]. MeDREB1A expression is extremely responsive to cold and significantly induced by polyethylene glycol (PEG) and ABA treatments. MeDREB1A overexpression in transgenic Arabidopsis and cassava plants enhance their cold tolerance[39]. Similarly, MeDREB1D overexpression also confers tolerance to cold and drought stresses in transgenic Arabidopsis[40]. Increasing evidence showed that TF-mediated stress adaptive signaling was intimately linked to primary cellular metabolism, ROS metabolism, and hormone signaling pathways. For example, a drought stress-responsive TF MeRAV5 promoted the activities of peroxidase (MePOD) and lignin-related cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase 15 (MeCAD15) to affect the accumulation of H2O2 and endogenous lignin, respectively, which were important in drought stress resistance of cassava[22]. Modified tolerance to cold stress of MeTCP4-overexpressed plants was attributed to MeTCP4-mediated cellular protection against toxic ROS[41]. RNAi-driven repression of the ABA-responsive MYB TF, namely MeMYB2, resulted in drought and low temperature tolerance in transgenic cassava and allowed the identification of target genes, including other MYB and WRKY TFs[42]. Based on this concept, the drought-responsive MeWRKY20 and MeWHY1/2/3 controlled the cellular accumulation of ABA via inducing the expression of ABA biosynthetic genes, MeNCED5 and MeNCED1, respectively, thereby enhancing the drought tolerance of wild-type cassava plants[24,43]. As another example, the drought-responsive TF SQUAMOSA promoter binding protein-like 9 (MeSPL9) was a repressor of anthocyanin and JA formation and showed negative functions in drought stress resistance. Additionally, bZIP TF MeABL5 responsive to ABA and JA positively regulated MeCWINV3 expression and might participate in robust resistance to abiotic stress in cassava[44]. These findings indicate the importance of TFs in drought and cold stresse tolerance in cassava.

    • Non-coding RNAs (ncRNA), such as microRNAs (miRNAs, 20−24 nt) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs, > 200 nt), have been increasingly essential bioactive molecules regulating plant growth, biotic and abiotic stress responses in various species[45]. Generally, they interact with DNA, RNA, and proteins to control gene expression at the transcriptional, post-transcriptional, and translational levels[46]. Unlike lncRNAs, miRNAs are highly conserved in the evolution of plant species from monocots to dicots[46]. Individual plant species harbor conserved miRNAs and species-specific miRNAs[46]. For example, 85 conserved miRNAs of 23 families have been identified in four Euphorbiaceous species, including cassava, jatropha, castor bean, and rubber tree[47]. Among them, miR156, miR397, and miR399 are up-regulated under dehydration stress, while miR164 and miR398 are induced by chilling treatments in cassava[48,49]. The targets of these miRNAs have been verified and functionally characterized, such as miR156-targeted MeSPL9 and miR319-targeted MeTCP4[25,41,5052]. Likewise, a series of novel miRNAs, e.g., miR2118, novel-52, and novel-54, have been identified in the deep-sequencing and EST database[49,5355]. The expression of the miRNAs is promoted or suppressed under drought and chilling stresses[48,56].

      Recently, lncRNAs have been proved to be key regulators of gene expression in various biological processes of plants, and a great number of lncRNAs have been identified in cassava[5759]. For instance, based on the analysis of strand-specific RNA-seq (ssRNA-seq) data, Li et al.[60] presented the first reference catalog of 682 high-confidence lncRNAs from cassava shoots under drought, cold, and control conditions. Among them, 69 lncRNAs were confirmed as responsive to both cold and drought stresses[60]. Suksamran et al. indicated that stress-induced lncRNAs might participate in the post-transcriptional regulation of stress-responsive TFs such as nuclear factor Y, zinc-finger, and WRKY gene families[61]. Furthermore, 652 intergenic lncRNAs and 181 antisense lncRNAs have been identified in cassava leaves and roots, 124 of which were drought-responsive[59]. In addition, Ding et al. found 185 lncRNAs differentially expressed under PEG or melatonin (MT) treatment versus the control condition[62]. The trans-regulatory co-expression network revealed that MT-responsive lncRNAs were mainly involved in cell wall modification, cytochrome P450, and tetrapyrrole synthesis; in contrast, PEG-responsive lncRNAs mainly participated in hormone metabolism, calcium signaling, and the RNA regulation of transcription[59,62]. Notably, 86 autotetraploid-specific lncRNAs were identified to be differentially expressed in drought-stressed leaves. Trans-regulatory network analysis showed that these lncRNAs were associated with galactose metabolism, brassinosteroid biosynthesis, and pentose phosphate pathway[58]. Although plenty of abiotic stress-related lncRNAs have been investigated in cassava, their biological functions still remain to be determined. Recently, a novel cold-responsive intergenic lncRNA 1 (CRIR1) was characterized as a positive regulator of plant responses to cold stress. It can regulate a number of cold stress-related genes in a CBF-independent pathway and directly interact with cold shock protein 5 (MeCSP5), which may improve the translation efficiency of mRNAs[57]. Similarly, Dong et al. identified a novel lncRNA, namely drought-induced intergenic lncRNA (DIR), which could enhance proline accumulation and drought tolerance in transgenic cassava[63]. Collectively, these recent research advances highlight the importance of ncRNAs for drought and cold adaptation in plants.

    • Plant hormones function as central integrators in maintaining the balance between plant growth and stress tolerance[64]. In cassava, increasing evidence has proved a convergence and crosstalk of ABA, JA, and ETH responses with the abiotic stress signaling pathways[29]. As reviewed by Sah et al.[65], ABA was the most important hormone conferring abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. An increased level of endogenous ABA has been observed in drought-stressed cassava seedlings, and exogenous ABA application to cassava plants could increase their adaptive responses to water stress[24,43]. Many genes, including KUP, MYB, NAC,GRF, WRKY, GRX and CIPK, were induced or repressed by ABA treatment[33,35,6670]. Among them, TF MeWRKY20 has been reported to directly activate the expression of ABA synthesis gene NCED5 (9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase), which was facilitated by 90 kDa heat shock protein (MeHSP90), and to regulate drought resistance by modulating ABA biosynthesis[24]. In cassava, six NCEDs were found to be increased under drought stress[10,71]. Recently, Yan et al. showed that MeWHY1/2/3 directly targeted the PB element of the MeNCED1 promoter and promoted MeNCED1 transcription to activateABA biosynthesis[43].

      In cassava plants, the endogenous JA concentrations increased rapidly after drought stress, and external JA application has also been revealed to improve drought tolerance by closing stomata and preventing water loss. Drought and/or cold stress could induce the expression of a range of JA biosynthesis or responsive genes, such as LOXs (lipoxygenases), JAZs, and MYCs[25,29]. In addition, numerous TFs associated with drought and cold stresses, such as MeARC5 (accumulation and replication of chloroplasts 5), MeFtsZ2-1 (filamentous temperature-sensitive protein Z 2-1), and MeMYB108, were expressed following JA treatment[7274]. Li et al.[25] demonstrated that MeSPL9 down-regulated JA biosynthetic genes and played a negative regulatory role in drought tolerance in cassava. Endogenous ETH was also induced by water stress and was involved in cassava leaf abscission by enhancing ROS accumulation in the cassava leaf pulvinus-petiole abscission zones, where it has been shown that GST and ERF genes are also highly expressed under both ETH and drought treatments[34,75]. Interestingly, a crosstalk of ABA and ETH signaling was found in plants under drought stress recently. For example, MeGRXC15-overexpressed Arabidopsis plants were more resistant to drought stress, and MeGRXC15 might affect various TF expressions involved in ABA and ET signaling pathways[69]. As another example, Wang et al. found that MeMYB108 was induced by ABA, JA, and ETH treatments, and MeMYB108 overexpression significantly reduced the rate of drought-induced leaf abscission under drought[74]. Taken together, these findings strongly suggest the modulating role of hormone pathways in abiotic stress tolerance in cassava plants.

    • Oxidative damage is a major feature of crop plants exposed to abiotic stresses. ROS in the form of hydrogen peroxide, superoxide, and nitric oxide are produced under drought and cold conditions and lead to cellular damage via oxidation or membrane injury. In plants, ROS homeostasis is maintained by an antioxidative system composed of non-enzymes (ascorbate, α-tocopherol, carotenoid, and glutathione) and ROS-scavenging enzymes, including ascorbate peroxidase (APX), superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and glutathione reductase (GR)[76]. Up-regulation of ROS metabolism genes in cassava leaves or abscission zone cells under drought and/or cold stress has been reported[11,12,77]. MeCAT1- or peroxidase (MePOD)-silenced plants displayed drought sensitivity in cassava through virus-induced gene silencing, indicating their importance for drought stress response[22,24]. MeCAT1 activity could be positively regulated by the MeHSP90, which was essential for drought resistance in cassava[24]. Xu et al. reported that transgenic cassava with increased expression of MeCAT1 and MeCu/ZnSOD represented improved resistance to drought and cold stresses[78]. Similarly, the coupled expression of MeCu/ZnSOD and MeAPX2 could simultaneously activate the antioxidant defense mechanisms and thereby enhance cassava tolerance to oxidative and cold stresses, as observed by higher levels of SOD, catalase, and ascorbate-glutathione cycle enzymes, as well as lower levels of MDA content[79]. Recently, the regulatory functions of TFs, namely MeRAV1/2 and RAV5, in ROS detoxification by targeting MeCAT6/7 and MePOD suggested a function of TFs in linking ROS scavenging to drought and oxidative stress-induced signaling[22,80]. Additionally, according to the transcriptional profiling studies of Arabidopsis plants overexpressing MeTCP4 and MeDREB1D, MeTCP4 and MeDREB1D induced a member of the ROS-scavenging genes, respectively, under drought and/or cold stress, leading to increased tolerance to abiotic stresses[40,41]. These studies strongly suggest the involvement of the ROS signaling pathway in drought adaptation in cassava plants.

    • Alternative splicing (AS), the differential processing of exons and introns in pre-mRNAs to generate multiple transcript isoforms for one gene, remarkably enhances the adaptability of plants under stresses via increasing the diversity of transcriptomes and proteins[81]. Generally, AS can perform two main molecular functions: (1) AS expand the complexity of proteome by producing two or more protein isoforms, which may present different functional properties. (2) AS regulates mRNA level by disrupting the main open reading frame (ORF) of the gene, creating truncated protein isoforms and/or triggering nonsense-mediated mRNA decay[82]. The five major AS events include intron retention (IR), mutually exclusive exons (MXE), exon skipping (ES), alternative 5′ splice sites (A5SS; alternative donor site), and alternative 3′ splice sites (A3SS; alternative acceptor site)[83], among which IR is the most common type in plants[84]. A number of transcriptomic and single-gene studies have investigated that AS participate in response of plants to environmental stimuli, especially drought and cold stresses[8587]. Vast numbers of stress-related splicing factors and regulators of cassava underwent different types of AS events, and modulated gene expression under cold stress[88]. However, very few studies have elucidated the upstream regulatory mechanisms of AS during the response to stress in cassava. SR proteins play important roles in both AS and constitutive by regulating the recruitment of splicing machinery to splice sites[89]. Weng et al.[90] found that MeSCL30 overexpression in Arabidopsis enhanced drought tolerance by maintaining ROS homeostasis and increasing drought-responsive gene expression. Similarly, the overexpression of MeRSZ21b, the RSZ subgroup of the SR family, improved drought tolerance through modulating ABA-dependent signaling in Arabidopsis[91]. Remarkably, increasing evidence in model plants has shown that ABA signaling is widely regulated at the AS level[81]. ABA regulates the splicing of HAB1, a key gene of ABA signaling, by mediating SR45 expression, thereby adjusting salt and drought stresses[92]. However, the interaction of ABA signaling and AS-related proteins were less explored in cassava. In the future, novel splicing factors and their target mRNAs acting in the ABA pathway should be investigated to improve our understanding of how AS modulates abiotic stress responses in plants. Taken together, these findings validate the importance of AS and provided novel insights into the manipulation of AS-related genes to enhance the resistance of cassava plants to abiotic stresses.

    • In conclusion, recent research advances have preliminarily elucidated a complex molecular signaling network to explain how cassava plants regulate adaptation to drought and/or cold stresses. More importantly, molecular signaling components of plant adaptation to both stresses have been linked to TFs, ncRNAs, ROS, AS, and hormone-derived pathways (Fig. 1b). The cassava genome resequencing and various reverse genetics strategies for generating knockout mutants are expected to contribute to the identification of more signaling components, thereby getting a clearer picture of drought and/or cold stress signaling networks. Further studies on physiological and molecular mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance are critical for characterisation of a number of genes associated with stress adaptation. Furthermore, plant biotechnology, marker-assisted selection, genomic selection and inbreeding techniques could be employed to improve abiotic stress tolerant of cassava and other crops.

      • The authors would like to acknowledge the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund for Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (1630052021026, 1630052022008), the Major Science and Technology plan of Hainan Province (ZDKJ2021012), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFD1000500, 2019YFD1000500 and 2019YFD1001105), and the Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (320MS097).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Received 27 July 2022; Accepted 23 August 2022; Published online 5 September 2022

      • Copyright: © 2022 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press on behalf of Hainan University. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (1)  References (92)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Li S, Zhao P, Yu X, Liao W, Peng M, et al. 2022. Cell signaling during drought and/or cold stress in cassava. Tropical Plants 1:6 doi: 10.48130/TP-2022-0006
    Li S, Zhao P, Yu X, Liao W, Peng M, et al. 2022. Cell signaling during drought and/or cold stress in cassava. Tropical Plants 1:6 doi: 10.48130/TP-2022-0006

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return