Search
2024 Volume 4
Article Contents
MINI REVIEW   Open Access    

Lignin biosynthesis pathway repressors in gymnosperms: differential repressor domains as compared to angiosperms

More Information
  • Received: 28 March 2024
    Revised: 08 July 2024
    Accepted: 26 August 2024
    Published online: 19 September 2024
    Forestry Research  4 Article number: e031 (2024)  |  Cite this article
  • Lignin is a polyphenolic polymer present in the cell walls of specialized plant cell types in vascular plants that provides structural support and plays a major role in plant protection. The lignin biosynthesis pathway is regulated by transcription factors from the MYB (myeloblastosis) family. While several MYB members positively regulate lignin synthesis, only a few negatively regulate lignin synthesis. These lignin suppressors are well characterized in model plant species; however, their role has not been fully explored in gymnosperms. Lignin forms one of the major hurdles for the forest-based industry e.g. paper, pulp, and biofuel production. Therefore, the detailed mechanisms involved in the regulation of lignin synthesis are valuable, especially in conifers that form the major source of softwood for timber and paper production. In this review, the potential and differential domains present in the MYB suppressors in gymnosperms are discussed, along with their phylogenetic analysis. Sequence analysis revealed that the N-terminal regions of the MYB suppressor members were found to be conserved among the gymnosperms and angiosperms containing the R2, R3, and bHLH domains, while the C-terminal regions were found to be highly variable. The typical repressor motifs like the LxLxL-type EAR motif and the TLLLFR motif were absent from the C-terminal regions of MYB suppressors from most gymnosperms. However, although the gymnosperms lacked the characteristic repressor domains, a R2R3-type MYB member from Ginkgo was reported to repress the lignin biosynthetic pathway. It is proposed that gymnosperms possess unique kinds of repressors that need further functional validation.
  • 加载中
  • Supplemental Table S1 List of sequences included in the alignments and phylogenetic tree.
    Supplemental Fig. S1 Alignment of Arabidopsis thaliana MYB3 (AtMYB3), Gingko biloba MYB (GbMYBR1) and all MYB3-like copies from Picea abies (Pa).
    Supplemental Fig. S2 Alignment of Arabidopsis thaliana MYB3 (AtMYB3), Gingko biloba MYB (GbMYBR1) and all MYB3-like copies from Pinus taeda (Pt).
    Supplemental Fig. S3 Alignment of Arabidopsis thaliana MYB4 (AtMYB4), Gingko biloba MYB GbMYBR1) and all MYB4-like copies from Picea abies (Pa).
    Supplemental Fig. S4 Alignment of Arabidopsis thaliana MYB4 (AtMYB4), Gingko biloba MYB (GbMYBR1) and all MYB4-like copies from Pinus taeda (Pt).
    Supplemental Fig. S5 Alignment of the lignin repressor MYB members from gymnosperm and angiosperm species: MYB3-like and MYB4-like copies from Picea abies (Pa) and Pinus taeda (Pt) along with GbMYBR1 from Ginkgo biloba (Gb); CfMYB5 from Cryptomeria fortune (Cf); MYB3, MYB4, MYB7 and MYB32 from Arabidopsis thaliana (At); MYB156 and MYB221 from Populus trichocarpa (Potri); EgMYB1 from Eucalyptus gunnii (Eg); ZmMYB31 and ZmMYB42 from Zea mays (Zm) and PvMYB4 from Panicum virgatum (Pv). Alternative EAR domain in Pt_AtMYB4-like1, Pt_AtMYB4-like3, Pt_AtMYB4-like4 and Pa_AtMYB4-like1 are marked with box and, bold and underlined.
  • [1]

    Barros J, Serk H, Granlund I, Pesquet E. 2015. The cell biology of lignification in higher plants. Annals of Botany 115:1053−74

    doi: 10.1093/aob/mcv046

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Lourenço A, Pereira A. 2018. Compositional variability of lignin in biomass. In Lignin - Trends and Applications, ed. Poletto M. UK: IntechOpen. pp. 65−98. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.71208

    [3]

    Lee MH, Jeon HS, Kim SH, Chung JH, Roppolo D, et al. 2019. Lignin-based barrier restricts pathogens to the infection site and confers resistance in plants. Embo Journal 38:e101948

    doi: 10.15252/embj.2019101948

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Novaes E, Kirst M, Chiang V, Winter-Sederoff H, Sederoff R. 2010. Lignin and biomass: a negative correlation for wood formation and lignin content in trees. Plant Physiology 154:555−61

    doi: 10.1104/pp.110.161281

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Kocaturk E, Salan T, Ozcelik O, Alma MH, Candan Z. 2023. Recent advances in lignin-based biofuel production. Energies 16:3382

    doi: 10.3390/en16083382

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Díaz-Sala C, Cabezas JA, de Simón BF, Abarca D, Guevara MÁ, et al. 2013. The uniqueness of conifers. In From Plant Genomics to Plant Biotechnology, eds Poltronieri P, Burbulis N, Fogher C. UK: Woodhead Publishing. pp. 67−96. doi: 10.1533/9781908818478.67

    [7]

    Pratyusha DS, Sarada DVL. 2022. MYB transcription factors—master regulators of phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and diverse developmental and stress responses. Plant Cell Reports 41:2245−60

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-022-02927-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Dubos C, Stracke R, Grotewold E, Weisshaar B, Martin C, Lepiniec L. 2010. MYB transcription factors in Arabidopsis. Trends in Plant Science 15:573−81

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2010.06.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Stracke R, Werber M, Weisshaar B. 2001. The R2R3-MYB gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 4:447−56

    doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(00)00199-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Xiao R, Zhang C, Guo X, Li H, Lu H. 2021. MYB transcription factors and its regulation in secondary cell wall formation and lignin biosynthesis during xylem development. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:3560

    doi: 10.3390/ijms22073560

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Behr M, Guerriero G, Grima-Pettenati J, Baucher M. 2019. A molecular blueprint of lignin repression. Trends in Plant Science 24:1052−64

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.07.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Ma DW, Constabel CP. 2019. MYB repressors as regulators of phenylpropanoid metabolism in plants. Trends in Plant Science 24:275−89

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.12.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Jin H, Cominelli E, Bailey P, Parr A, Mehrtens F, et al. 2000. Transcriptional repression by AtMYB4 controls production of UV-protecting sunscreens in Arabidopsis. The EMBO Journal 19:6150−61

    doi: 10.1093/emboj/19.22.6150

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Zhou M, Sun Z, Wang C, Zhang X, Tang Y, et al. 2015. Changing a conserved amino acid in R2R3-MYB transcription repressors results in cytoplasmic accumulation and abolishes their repressive activity in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 84:395−403

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.13008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Kagale S, Rozwadowski K. 2011. EAR motif-mediated transcriptional repression in plants: an underlying mechanism for epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Epigenetics 6:141−46

    doi: 10.4161/epi.6.2.13627

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Liu Q, Luo L, Zheng L. 2018. Lignins: biosynthesis and biological functions in plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19:335

    doi: 10.3390/ijms19020335

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Legay S, Lacombe E, Goicoechea M, Brière C, Séguin A, et al. 2007. Molecular characterization of EgMYB1, a putative transcriptional repressor of the lignin biosynthetic pathway. Plant Science 173:542−49

    doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.08.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Shen H, He X, Poovaiah CR, Wuddineh WA, Ma J, et al. 2012. Functional characterization of the switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) R2R3-MYB transcription factor PvMYB4 for improvement of lignocellulosic feedstocks. New Phytologist 193:121−36

    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03922.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Sonbol FM, Fornalé S, Capellades M, Encina A, Touriño S, et al. 2009. The maize ZmMYB42 represses the phenylpropanoid pathway and affects the cell wall structure, composition and degradability in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Molecular Biology 70:283−96

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-009-9473-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Fornalé S, Shi X, Chai C, Encina A, Irar S, et al. 2010. ZmMYB31 directly represses maize lignin genes and redirects the phenylpropanoid metabolic flux. The Plant Journal 64:633−44

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04363.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Zhou J, Lee C, Zhong R, Ye ZH. 2009. MYB58 and MYB63 are transcriptional activators of the lignin biosynthetic pathway during secondary cell wall formation in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 21:248−66

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.063321

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Goicoechea M, Lacombe E, Legay S, Mihaljevic S, Rech P, et al. 2005. EgMYB2, a new transcriptional activator from Eucalyptus xylem, regulates secondary cell wall formation and lignin biosynthesis. The Plant Journal 43:553−67

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02480.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Li C, Wang X, Ran L, Tian Q, Fan D, et al. 2015. PtoMYB92 is a transcriptional activator of the lignin biosynthetic pathway during secondary cell wall formation in Populus tomentosa. Plant and Cell Physiology 56:2436−46

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcv157

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Tian Q, Wang X, Li C, Lu W, Yang L, et al. 2013. Functional characterization of the poplar R2R3-MYB transcription factor PtoMYB216 involved in the regulation of lignin biosynthesis during wood formation. PLoS One 8:e76369

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076369

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Czemmel S, Stracke R, Weisshaar B, Cordon N, Harris NN, et al. 2009. The grapevine R2R3-MYB transcription factor VvMYBF1 regulates flavonol synthesis in developing grape berries. Plant Physiology 151:1513−30

    doi: 10.1104/pp.109.142059

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Prouse MB, Campbell MM. 2013. Interactions between the R2R3-MYB transcription factor, MYB61, and target DNA binding sites. PLoS One 8:e65132

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065132

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Li S. 2014. Transcriptional control of flavonoid biosynthesis: fine-tuning of the MYB-bHLH-WD40 (MBW) complex. Plant Signaling & Behavior 9:e27522

    doi: 10.4161/psb.27522

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Zhou H, Kui LW, Wang F, Espley RV, Ren F, et al. 2019. Activator-type R2R3-MYB genes induce a repressor-type R2R3-MYB gene to balance anthocyanin and proanthocyanidin accumulation. New Phytologist 221:1919−34

    doi: 10.1111/nph.15486

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Ko JH, Jeon HW, Kim WC, Kim JY, Han KH. 2014. The MYB46/MYB83-mediated transcriptional regulatory programme is a gatekeeper of secondary wall biosynthesis. Annals of Botany 114:1099−107

    doi: 10.1093/aob/mcu126

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Su X, Xia Y, Jiang W, Shen G, Pang Y. 2020. GbMYBR1 from Ginkgo biloba represses phenylpropanoid biosynthesis and trichome development in Arabidopsis. Planta 252:68

    doi: 10.1007/s00425-020-03476-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Yang J, Xu J, Zhang Y, Cui J, Hu H, et al. 2023. Two R2R3-MYB transcription factors from Chinese cedar (Cryptomeria fortunei Hooibrenk) are involved in the regulation of secondary cell wall formation. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 201:107879

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2023.107879

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Ranade SS, Seipel G, Gorzsás A, García-Gil MR. 2022. Enhanced lignin synthesis and ecotypic variation in defense-related gene expression in response to shade in Norway spruce. Plant, Cell & Environment 45:2671−81

    doi: 10.1111/pce.14387

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Ranade SS, Seipel G, Gorzsás A, García-Gil MR. 2022. Adaptive strategies of Scots pine under shade: increase in lignin synthesis and ecotypic variation in defence-related gene expression. Physiologia Plantarum 174:e13792

    doi: 10.1111/ppl.13792

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Zimin A, Stevens KA, Crepeau MW, Holtz-Morris A, Koriabine M, et al. 2014. Sequencing and assembly of the 22-Gb loblolly pine genome. Genetics 196:875−90

    doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.159715

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Xu C, Fu X, Liu R, Guo L, Ran L, et al. 2017. PtoMYB170 positively regulates lignin deposition during wood formation in poplar and confers drought tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis. Tree Physiology 37:1713−26

    doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpx093

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Dereeper A, Guignon V, Blanc G, Audic S, Buffet S, et al. 2008. Phylogeny. fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist. Nucleic Acids Research 36:W465−W469

    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkn180

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Marchler-Bauer A, Derbyshire MK, Gonzales NR, Lu S, Chitsaz F, et al. 2015. CDD: NCBI's conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Research 43:D222−D226

    doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1221

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32:1792−97

    doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Li SF, Milliken ON, Pham H, Seyit R, Napoli R, et al. 2009. The Arabidopsis MYB5 transcription factor regulates mucilage synthesis, seed coat development, and trichome morphogenesis. The Plant Cell 21:72−89

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.063503

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Wang XC, Wu J, Guan ML, Zhao CH, Geng P, et al. 2020. Arabidopsis MYB4 plays dual roles in flavonoid biosynthesis. The Plant Journal 101:637−52

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.14570

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Bedon F, Grima-Pettenati J, Mackay J. 2007. Conifer R2R3-MYB transcription factors: sequence analyses and gene expression in wood-forming tissues of white spruce (Picea glauca). BMC Plant Biology 7:17

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-7-17

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Zhou M, Zhang K, Sun Z, Yan M, Chen C, et al. 2017. LNK1 and LNK2 corepressors interact with the MYB3 transcription factor in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis. Plant Physiology 174:1348−58

    doi: 10.1104/pp.17.00160

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Agarwal T, Grotewold E, Doseff AI, Gray J. 2016. MYB31/MYB42 syntelogs exhibit divergent regulation of phenylpropanoid genes in maize, sorghum and rice. Scientific Reports 6:28502

    doi: 10.1038/srep28502

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Miyamoto T, Tobimatsu Y, Umezawa T. 2020. MYB-mediated regulation of lignin biosynthesis in grasses. Current Plant Biology 24:100174

    doi: 10.1016/j.cpb.2020.100174

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Hussain S, Iqbal N, Pang T, Khan MN, Liu WG, et al. 2019. Weak stem under shade reveals the lignin reduction behavior. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 18:496−505

    doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(18)62111-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Wu L, Zhang W, Ding Y, Zhang J, Cambula ED, et al. 2017. Shading contributes to the reduction of stem mechanical strength by decreasing cell wall synthesis in Japonica rice (Oryza sativa L.). Frontiers in Plant Science 8:881

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00881

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Neale DB, McGuire PE, Wheeler NC, Stevens KA, Crepeau MW, et al. 2017. The Douglas-fir genome sequence reveals specialization of the photosynthetic apparatus in Pinaceae. G3 Genes|Genomes| Genetics 7:3157−67

    doi: 10.1534/g3.117.300078

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Ranade SS, García-Gil MR. 2024. Lignin biosynthesis pathway repressors in gymnosperms: differential repressor domains as compared to angiosperms. Forestry Research 4: e031 doi: 10.48130/forres-0024-0029
    Ranade SS, García-Gil MR. 2024. Lignin biosynthesis pathway repressors in gymnosperms: differential repressor domains as compared to angiosperms. Forestry Research 4: e031 doi: 10.48130/forres-0024-0029

Figures(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(301) PDF downloads(59)

Other Articles By Authors

MINI REVIEW   Open Access    

Lignin biosynthesis pathway repressors in gymnosperms: differential repressor domains as compared to angiosperms

Forestry Research  4 Article number: e031  (2024)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Lignin is a polyphenolic polymer present in the cell walls of specialized plant cell types in vascular plants that provides structural support and plays a major role in plant protection. The lignin biosynthesis pathway is regulated by transcription factors from the MYB (myeloblastosis) family. While several MYB members positively regulate lignin synthesis, only a few negatively regulate lignin synthesis. These lignin suppressors are well characterized in model plant species; however, their role has not been fully explored in gymnosperms. Lignin forms one of the major hurdles for the forest-based industry e.g. paper, pulp, and biofuel production. Therefore, the detailed mechanisms involved in the regulation of lignin synthesis are valuable, especially in conifers that form the major source of softwood for timber and paper production. In this review, the potential and differential domains present in the MYB suppressors in gymnosperms are discussed, along with their phylogenetic analysis. Sequence analysis revealed that the N-terminal regions of the MYB suppressor members were found to be conserved among the gymnosperms and angiosperms containing the R2, R3, and bHLH domains, while the C-terminal regions were found to be highly variable. The typical repressor motifs like the LxLxL-type EAR motif and the TLLLFR motif were absent from the C-terminal regions of MYB suppressors from most gymnosperms. However, although the gymnosperms lacked the characteristic repressor domains, a R2R3-type MYB member from Ginkgo was reported to repress the lignin biosynthetic pathway. It is proposed that gymnosperms possess unique kinds of repressors that need further functional validation.

    • Lignin is one of the most abundant secondary metabolites present in the cell walls of specialized plant cell types in vascular plants[1]. Lignin is an organic polyphenolic polymer that is formed by the polymerization of three monolignols – p-coumaryl alcohol, coniferyl alcohol, and sinapyl alcohol, that produce p-hydroxyphenyl (H), guaiacyl (G), and syringyl (S) subunits, respectively. Gymnosperms lack the S-lignin subunits and have relatively higher lignin content compared to the angiosperm woody species[2]. Lignin provides structural support, transports water and minerals, and protects the plant from pathogens, thereby acting as a barrier[3]. However, lignin forms one of the major hurdles for the forest-based industry e.g. paper, pulp, and biofuel production[4]. For example, lignin negatively affects paper quality where the presence of lignin causes discoloration of the paper and weakens it. The degradation of lignin is difficult as it is a complex polymer, therefore modification or pretreatment of lignin is required to make the wood suitable for biofuel production[5]. Hence, the detailed mechanisms involved in the regulation of lignin synthesis are valuable for the industry. Conifers form the major source of softwood for timber and paper production, and they are especially preferred for pulp because of the long fibers in their wood[6]. Even so, while the lignin biosynthetic pathway is well studied in model plants like Arabidopsis thaliana (Arabidopsis) and other angiosperm woody trees, this research area remains relatively unexplored in gymnosperms.

      The lignin biosynthesis pathway is regulated by a complex network of transcription factors from the MYB (myeloblastosis) family that either positively or negatively controls lignin synthesis[7]. In this review, MYB members were referred to that activate or suppress lignin synthesis as MYB activators or MYB suppressors/repressors, respectively. This review focuses on the potential and differential domains present in the MYB suppressors in gymnosperms along with their phylogenetic analysis. The details of all the sequences included for the domain and phylogenetic analysis are included in Supplemental Table S1.

    • MYB family members are functionally diverse, and apart from regulating the lignin biosynthesis pathway they also control various processes involved in plant growth and development[8,9]. The N-terminal region of the MYB proteins is highly conserved containing the MYB repeats (R) involved in DNA binding; there are three types of R repeats – R1, R2, and R3. The MYB family in plants is classified into four classes according to the presence of the number of R domain repeats: 1R-MYB or MYB-related (having R1/R2/R3), R2R3-MYB (having R2 and R3), 3R-MYB (having R1, R2 and R3), and 4R-MYB (having R1, two R2 and R1/R2)[8]. The C-terminal region of the MYB proteins is highly variable and contains the regulatory domain (activation/suppression domain)[8].

      While there are several MYB members that positively regulate lignin synthesis, only a few from the R2R3-MYB class and their homologues in plant species including woody trees, negatively regulate lignin synthesis[10]. Arabidopsis is the most well studied plant model, where the R2R3-MYB members are well characterized. The R2R3-MYB class in Arabidopsis is the largest among the MYB family with 126 members which contains the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) domain within the R3 region. The R2R3 class is further classified into 25 subgroups depending on the motifs in the C-terminal region[9]. Subgroup 4 of the R2R3-MYB class comprises four members in Arabidopsis - MYB3, MYB4, MYB7, and MYB32[11,12]. These members contain conserved MYB motifs - LLsrGIDPxT/SHRxI/L (C1 motif) at the end of the R3 repeat and the C2 motif (pdLHLD/LLxIG/S) in the C-terminal regions. The C2 motif harbors the LxLxL-type or DLNxxP-type repression motif (Ethylene-responsive element binding factor-associated Amphiphilic Repression abbreviated as EAR)[1315]. MYB4, MYB7, and MYB32 additionally possess a putative zinc-finger motif (ZF motif, CX1–2CX7–12CX2C) and a conserved GY/FDFLGL motif (part of the C4 motif) in their C-termini region[14]. MYB3, MYB4, MYB7, and MYB32 have been demonstrated to function as the transcriptional repressors of phenylpropanoid pathway - lignin biosynthesis pathway and/or the biosynthesis of pigments in Arabidopsis[11,12]. MYB3 negatively regulates cinnamate 4-hydroxylase (C4H) that catalyses the second step of the phenylpropanoid pathway leading to lignin and pigment synthesis, while MYB4 can inhibit almost all the enzymes in the lignin synthesis pathway causing a decrease in lignin synthesis[10,16]. R2R3-MYB members from other angiosperm species that negatively regulate lignin biosynthesis included in this review are MYB156/MYB221 from populus (Populus trichocarpa), EgMYB1 from eucalyptus (Eucalyptus gunnii), ZmMYB31/ZmMYB42 from maize (Zea mays) and PvMYB4 from switchgrass (Panicum virgatum)[10,1720].

      Similar to the repressors, the R2R3-MYB members that act as activators of the lignin biosynthesis pathway possess the conserved R2, R3, and bHLH domains in their N-terminal region, and their C-terminal region is highly variable. But unlike the repressors, where the characteristic repressor motif e.g. EAR has been described, the presence of a specific activator motif has not been described in the R2R3-MYB activators of the lignin biosynthesis pathway in multiple angiosperm species such as Arabidopsis (MYB58, MYB63)[21], eucalyptus (EgMYB2)[22] and populus (Populus tomentosa, PtoMYB92, PtoMYB216)[23,24]. However, a few activator motifs such as SG7 and SG7-2[9,25] have been reported in the C-terminal of R2R3-MYB members belonging to subgroup 7, which positively regulates flavonoid synthesis e.g. in grapevine (VvMYBF1)[25] and Arabidopsis (AtMYB12 and AtMYB111)[9].

      Both, the repressor and activator R2R3-MYB members, repress or activate the genes from the lignin biosynthesis pathway respectively, by binding to the AC elements (adenosine and cytosine-enriched sequences) present in the promoters of lignin biosynthetic genes[26]. Another way in which these R2R3-MYB members function is by interacting with Glabrous 3 (GL3), which is the key element of the MYB-bHLH-WD40 (MBW) complex that regulates the lignin biosynthesis pathway, flavonoid biosynthesis and trichome development in Arabidopsis[27]. The repressors compete with the activators to bind to GL3 or to the AC elements of promoters, to bring about the repression of the lignin biosynthesis pathway genes[12,28].

      Apart from repressors and activators, the R2R3-MYB family comprises members that act as master regulators of cell wall formation, e.g. MYB46 which is a multifaceted R2R3-MYB transcription factor in Arabidopsis. MYB46 along with its paralogue MYB83, functions as a master switch for the secondary cell wall biosynthesis that not only mediates the transcriptional network involved in the secondary cell wall formation, but also regulates the genes from the cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin biosynthesis pathways including upstream regulators and downstream targets[29].

    • To date, only two studies in gymnosperms have validated the repressor activity of the R2R3-MYB transcription factor in the lignin biosynthetic pathway - GbMYBR1 in Ginkgo biloba (Ginkgo) and CfMYB5 in Chinese cedar (Cryptomeria fortunei Hooibrenk)[30,31]. Recently, differential regulation of the MYBs (copies of MYB3 and MYB4) that potentially act as suppressors and the variation in lignin synthesis in response to light quality in the Norway spruce (Picea abies)[32] and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris)[33] seedlings were reported based on the transcriptomic and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) analysis. The Scots pine reads in the previous study[33] were aligned to the loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) genome (v1.01)[34], therefore the corresponding MYB sequences retrieved from loblolly pine were considered for this review. MYB3 copies from Picea were named Pa_AtMYB3-like1, Pa_AtMYB3-like2, and so on, while copies from Pinus were named Pt_AtMYB3-like1, Pt_AtMYB3-like2, and so on. A similar naming convention was followed for the MYB4 copies from both conifers. A total of 23 MYB repressors from gymnosperms including eight sequences from Norway spruce, 13 sequences from loblolly pine and one sequence from Ginkgo and one sequence from Chinese cedar were recruited for the analysis.

      The earlier phylogenetic analysis suggested GbMYBR1 to be a distinct MYB suppressor closely related to MYB5 from Arabidopsis[30] and showed that CfMYB5 was grouped with ZmMYB31 (Zea mays), EgMYB1 (Eucalyptus grandis) and AtMYB4 (Arabidopsis), which inhibited lignin synthesis[31]. For the current review, MYB members reported by earlier studies[11,12,1720,24,30,32,33,35] were included in the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1), which was constructed using Phylogeny.fr with default settings[36]. MYB members from Arabidopsis that repress the phenylpropanoid pathway such as MYB3, MYB4, MYB7 and MYB32 (AtMYB3, AtMYB4, MYB7, MYB32) were included in the phylogenetic tree as Arabidopsis is the most well-studied model system in plants. CfMYB5 and GbMYBR1 were included in the phylogenetic tree as they are the R2R3-MYB repressor genes from gymnosperms that negatively regulate the lignin biosynthesis pathway[30,31]. MYB5 from Arabidopsis (AtMYB5) was included in the construction of the phylogenetic tree as some of the MYB members from conifers showed the presence of the provisional MYB5 repressor in the C-terminal domain in the Conserved Domain Database[37] (CDD) search and GbMYBR1 is closely related to MYB5 from Arabidopsis[30]. The MYB3/MYB4 copies from Norway spruce and Scots pine (corresponding Pinus taeda sequences) from earlier studies[32,33], which were proposed to repress lignin synthesis, were included in the phylogenetic tree. R2R3-MYB family members from a few other species that repress lignin biosynthesis were included in the phylogenetic tree, e.g. Potri_MYB156 and Potri_MYB221 from populus; EgMYB1 from eucalyptus; PvMYB4 from switchgrass; ZmMYB31 and ZmMYB42 from maize[10,1720]. PtoMYB170 and PtoMYB216 from Populus tomentosa and, AtMYB58 and AtMYB63 from Arabidopsis, which positively regulates lignin deposition during the formation of wood[21,35], were included in the phylogenetic tree as an outgroup.

      Figure 1. 

      Phylogenetic tree constructed with copies of MYB3-like and MYB4-like from Picea abies (Pa) and Pinus taeda (Pt) along with GbMYBR1 from Ginkgo biloba (Gb); CfMYB5 from Cryptomeria fortune (Cf); MYB3, MYB4, MYB5, MYB7, MYB32, MYB58 and MYB63 from Arabidopsis thaliana (At); MYB156 and MYB221 from Populus trichocarpa (Potri); MYB170 and MYB216 from Populus tomentosa (Pto); EgMYB1 from Eucalyptus gunnii (Eg); ZmMYB31 and ZmMYB42 from Zea mays (Zm) and, PvMYB4 from Panicum virgatum (Pv).

      The phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1) shows two distinct sub-clades, one sub-clade that contains all the MYB3-like members from the two conifers (except Pt_AtMYB3-like7) and one MYB4-like member from spruce (Pa_AtMYB4-like3), along with AtMYB5 and GbMYBR1. The other sub-clade includes all the MYB4-like members from the two conifers along with AtMYB3 and AtMYB4 from Arabidopsis, and the R2R3-MYB family suppressors from populus, eucalyptus, switchgrass, and maize. Overall, the phylogenetic analysis shows a clear separation of the MYB3-like and MYB4-like R2R3-MYB members from the two conifer species into two groups, where the GbMYBR1 from Ginkgo groups with the MYB3-like members. This suggests that the MYB3-like members from conifers and Ginkgo may have distinct motifs which differ from the motifs present in the angiosperms. However, the MYB4-like conifer members seem to have motifs that are similar to angiosperm species e.g. many of the MYB4-like conifer members contain the EAR motif, while EAR was detected in only one of the MYB3-like members (Pt_AtMYB3-like1). CfMYB5 from Chinese cedar seems to contain unique motifs compared to all the gymnosperm members included in this study.

    • Alignments of MYB repressors from the gymnosperms and angiosperms species are included in the Supplemental information (Supplemental Figs S1S5). GbMYBR1 shows distinct sequence characteristics; it has low identity with characterized MYB4 repressors from Arabidopsis and other angiosperm species. Although the characteristic domains of the R2R3-type repressors e.g. C1, C2, ZF, and C4 motifs and, the typical repressors motifs like the LxLxL-type EAR motif and the TLLLFR motif are absent in GbMYBR1 from the C-terminal, GbMYBR1 has the R2 and R3 domain in the N-terminal region including the conserved bHLH-binding motif (Fig. 2)[30]. CfMYB5 from Chinese cedar contains the conserved R2 and R3 domains in the N-terminal like Ginkgo, however, the study did not report any typical R2R3-type suppressor domain in its C-terminal[31]. The current sequence analysis reports the presence of the EAR suppression domain (LCLSL) in the C-terminal region of CfMYB5 (Fig. 3, Supplemental Fig. S5), which is novel.

      Copies or homologs of MYB3 and MYB4 were detected to be differentially regulated under shade (Low Red : Far-red) in Norway spruce and Scots pine and these MYB copies were proposed to repress the lignin synthesis as their down-regulation correlated with enhanced lignin synthesis[32,33]. Alignments[38] performed with the different copies of MYB repressors reported by earlier studies[8,30,32,33] show that the sequences are well conserved in gymnosperms and angiosperms in the N-terminal regions (R2, R3 along with the bHLH binding motif) but not in the C-terminal region (Fig. 2, Supplemental Figs S1S5) which are in accordance with the previous findings. The C-terminal regions (with the C1, C2, ZF, and C4 motifs) are the most variable regions within the different conifer MYB members (Supplemental Figs S1S4) which agrees with the findings in Arabidopsis[8,9]. The alignment of partial C-terminal regions of MYB repressors from gymnosperms and angiosperms (Fig. 3) show that most MYB3/MYB4 copies from both conifers lack the classical LxLxL-type EAR motif. It is worth noting that generally monocots possess the LNLDL motif and dicots have the LNLEL motif, while the conifers show the presence of both LNLDL and LNLEL, in addition to four more patterns – LNLNL, LDLGL, LDLQL, and LQLLL (Fig. 3). In Pt_AtMYB4-like1, Pt_AtMYB4-like3, Pt_AtMYB4-like4, and Pa_AtMYB4-like1, either LNLNL/LNLDL/LDLGL, LNLNL/LNLEL or LNLDL/LDLQL or LNLNL/LNLEL could function as a potential repressor, respectively (alternative EAR domains are marked with a box and, bold and underlined for Pt_AtMYB4-like1, Pt_AtMYB4-like3, Pt_AtMYB4-like4, and Pa_ AtMYB4-like1 in Fig. 3). It is also possible that LNLNLDLGL and LNLNLEL could function as a unique type of lignin repressor in conifers. CfMYB5 from Chinese cedar also shows the presence of a new pattern of the EAR motif (LCLSL), which was not described previously in this species by earlier investigations and is not represented in the angiosperms. None of the gymnosperm MYB members contain the conserved TLLLFR motif or the GY/FDFLGL motif, which are essential for the repressor activity of the transcription factors (Supplemental Figs S4 & S5)[12,14]. This is similar to the unique kind of R2R3-MYB-type repressor reported recently in Ginkgo (GbMYBR1)[30]. Similar to GbMYBR1, all the MYB3/MYB4 copies in both the conifer species contain the bHLH binding motif in the R3 region that could potentially be involved in the repression mechanism[30].

      Figure 2. 

      Alignment of N-terminal regions of the lignin repressor MYB members from gymnosperms and angiosperms showing the conserved R2, R3, and bHLH domains: MYB3-like and MYB4-like copies from Picea abies (Pa) and Pinus taeda (Pt) along with GbMYBR1 from Ginkgo biloba (Gb); CfMYB5 from Cryptomeria fortune (Cf); MYB3, MYB4, MYB7, and MYB32 from Arabidopsis thaliana (At); MYB156 and MYB221 from Populus trichocarpa (Potri); EgMYB1 from Eucalyptus gunnii (Eg); ZmMYB31 and ZmMYB42 from Zea mays (Zm) and PvMYB4 from Panicum virgatum (Pv).

      Figure 3. 

      Alignment of partial C-terminal regions of the lignin repressor MYB members from gymnosperms and angiosperms showing the conserved EAR domain (alternative EAR domains in Pt_AtMYB4-like1, Pt_AtMYB4-like3, Pt_AtMYB4-like4, and Pa_AtMYB4-like1 are marked with box and, bold and underlined): MYB3-like and MYB4-like copies from Picea abies (Pa) and Pinus taeda (Pt) along with GbMYBR1 from Ginkgo biloba (Gb); CfMYB5 from Cryptomeria fortune (Cf); MYB3, MYB4, MYB7, and MYB32 from Arabidopsis thaliana (At); MYB156 and MYB221 from Populus trichocarpa (Potri); EgMYB1 from Eucalyptus gunnii (Eg); ZmMYB31 and ZmMYB42 from Zea mays (Zm) and PvMYB4 from Panicum virgatum (Pv).

      Except for two MYB members in Pinus (Pt_AtMYB3-like7 and Pt_AtMYB4-like3), all the other MYB sequences in both conifers possess either the EAR repressor motif in the C-terminal (Fig. 3) and/or the putative repressor domain PLN03212 in the N-terminal region (Supplemental Table S1). The PLN03212 domain was detected in the motif search using CDD[37] with a very low E-value. The PLN03212 domain is the provisional repressor domain for the transcription factor MYB5 in Arabidopsis, but this domain has not been functionally characterized. MYB5 represses the flavonoid pathway, regulates mucilage synthesis, and plays a role in the development of the seed coat and trichome morphogenesis[39]. The PLN03212 domain is also present in GbMYBR1, but its potential function in the process of repression has not been reported[30]. The PLN03091 was yet another domain that was detected in the searches with CDD with a very low E-value in MYB suppressors from both conifers, similar to lignin repressors of other plant species (Supplemental Table S1). The PLN03091 is denoted as a provisional hypothetical protein in the CDD.

      It is proposed that conifers contain different types of MYB3/MYB4-like repressors, some of which contain the classical repressor motifs and others without the repressor motifs (e.g. LxLxL) analogous to that of GbMYBR1. Similar to GbMYBR1, the MYB3/MYB4-like repressors detected in Norway spruce and Scots pine[32,33] might have distinct sequence characteristics or motifs, whose potential functional characterisation needs further validation. These repressors and their mode of regulation especially regarding the defense and phenylpropanoid pathways might be unique to conifer species, which also needs further characterization.

    • The repressors from the MYB family are not fully explored in gymnosperms unlike the well-studied model plants e.g. Arabidopsis. GbMYBR1 from Ginkgo is mainly expressed in young leaves, although its expression was detected in the roots, stem and fruits; the expression level of GbMYBR1 in young leaves were more than 12-fold higher than the levels in roots or stems. GbMYBR1 is a unique kind of R2R3-MYB-type repressor that lacks the characteristic repressor motifs e.g. EAR motif and the TLLLFR motif from the C-terminal region, yet it suppresses the lignin biosynthesis pathway. Overexpression of GbMYBR1 in Arabidopsis represses lignin synthesis specifically through down-regulation of the key lignin biosynthesis pathway gene – hydroxycinnamoyl CoA: shikimate hydroxycinnamoyl transferase (HCT) which encodes the enzyme that catalyzes the rate-limiting step of the lignin biosynthesis pathway. In addition, GbMYBR1 down-regulates a few other genes from the lignin biosynthesis pathway including phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL), 4-coumarate: CoA ligase (4CL) and cinnamyl alcohol dehydrogenase (CAD). GbMYBR1 overexpression also reduces the pathogen resistance by significantly down-regulating a great number of defence-related genes in the transgenic Arabidopsis. Moreover, the transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing GbMYBR1 was more susceptible to bacterial infection as compared to the wild type. However, the regulatory process of the GbMYBR1 is entirely different from Arabidopsis; the lignin synthesis suppression by GbMYBR1 is not only more specific compared to the MYB repressors in Arabidopsis but the mode of action of GbMYBR1 to repress lignin synthesis is different from Arabidopsis[30]. The GbMYBR1 mode of action is mediated through direct and specific interaction with GL3 to compete against the interaction of GL3 with MYB activators, leading to the suppression of lignin synthesis[30]. For example, in Arabidopsis, the MYB4 that represses the lignin biosynthesis pathway, physically interacts not only with GL3 but also with other bHLH cofactors (e.g. TT8 and EGL3) to bring about the suppression[40]. Thus, the interaction of Arabidopsis repressor MYB with bHLH cofactors is not as specific as for GbMYBR1. In addition, overexpression of GbMYBR1 led to the down-regulation of HCT – a key gene from the lignin biosynthesis pathway along with only a few other genes from the lignin biosynthesis pathway in contrast to other angiosperm species where expression of multiple genes was affected along with reduced lignification as a result of the overexpression of MYB that acts as a repressor[30]. Thus, the suppression of GbMYBR1 on lignin biosynthesis is more specific than for the other repressor MYBs in Arabidopsis. Su et al. proposed the working model of GbMYBR1 and presented the details on the regulatory mechanism of GbMYBR1 in transgenic Arabidopsis[30], yet whether GbMYBR1 directly regulates the genes from lignin biosynthetic pathway in Ginkgo needs to be further explored and validated.

      CfMYB5 from Chinese cedar which negatively regulates the lignin biosynthesis is a nucleus-localized protein that is expressed at higher levels in the stem as compared to the needle, bud, male cone, and root[31]. The repressor activity of CfMYB5 was demonstrated from the analysis of its expression patterns; overexpression of CfMYB5 in the transgenic lines correlated with the decrease in expression of the key genes involved in the lignin biosynthesis pathway (HCT, PAL, 4CL, and CAD) along with a decrease in secondary cell wall formation which involves the deposition of both lignin and cellulose. Thus, CfMYB5 suppression was not specific only for lignin synthesis.

    • MYB4 has been demonstrated to respond to light quality in Arabidopsis; for example, UV-B irradiation down-regulates MYB4[13]. As the MYB repressor is involved in the negative regulation of the lignin biosynthesis pathway, its down-regulation leads to higher lignin synthesis. In Norway spruce, down-regulation of two copies of MYB3 under shade (Low Red : Far-red ratio) in the northern populations correlated with higher lignin synthesis in the case of north vs south comparisons[32] (Supplemental Table S1). While none of the repressors were detected to be differentially regulated under shade in the southern population, an equal number of repressors (MYB3/MYB4) were found to be up-regulated and down-regulated (p-value > 0.05) in the northern population of Norway spruce[32]. Nevertheless, MYB3/MYB4 gene expression in Scots pine was not fully in favour of higher lignin synthesis under shade[33]. The Scots pine reads in a previous study[33] were aligned to the loblolly pine (Pinus taeda) genome (v1.01)[34], therefore the corresponding MYB sequences retrieved from loblolly pine were considered for this review, as mentioned previously. Therefore, it is important to note that the Pinus taeda information in Supplemental Table S1 corresponds to Scots pine. An equal numbers of repressors (MYB3/MYB4) were found to be up-regulated and down-regulated (p-value > 0.05) respectively in the southern and northern Scots pine population under shade (Supplemental Table S1). In the case of north vs south comparisons, four MYB members were found to be up-regulated in the northern Scots pine population as compared to the southern population under shade, suggesting higher lignin synthesis in the southern population[33]. The analysis for genes that positively regulate the lignin biosynthesis in these studies suggest an equal number of genes being up-regulated and down-regulated under shade in both the conifer species[32,33]. However, the FTIR spectroscopic data confirmed higher synthesis of lignin in response to shade as compared to the sun conditions in both conifers[32,33]. The difference in the binding capacity between the MYB family members may be one of the possible reasons behind the inconsistency between MYB3/MYB4 expression and lignin synthesis. A proteomic and metabolomic analysis may reveal concordance between the FTIR data and the MYB3/MYB4 regulatory mechanism. In addition, it is the highly variable C-terminal region of different plant MYBs that contains the repressor domain, which is not characterized in conifers. For example, in Arabidopsis, a change (D261N) in a conserved amino acid in the GY/FDFLGL motif present in the C-terminal region of the R2R3-type MYB4 transcription repressor resulted in abolishing its repressive activity[14]. The N-terminal region of the different MYB members in both conifers was found to be conserved while the C-terminal region was highly variable (Supplemental Figs S1S5). It is proposed that conifers may contain novel motifs in the C-terminal region of the MYB members that may be specific to conifer species, which needs to be functionally validated[41]. Furthermore, there could be conifer-specific co-repressors that interact in general with the MYB members of subgroup 4 and specifically with MYB3 to regulate the phenylpropanoid pathway similar to Arabidopsis where the NIGHT LIGHT-INDUCIBLE AND CLOCK-REGULATED1 (LNK1) and LNK2 act as co-repressors along with MYB3[42]. The LNK-MYB3 transcription complex plays a role in the repression of the C4H gene, one of the key genes involved in lignin biosynthesis[42]. Other factors contributing to the phenylpropanoid pathway regulation includes interactions between the MYB members that are co-expressed, their probable interactions with other transcription factors and the feedback loops. These need further investigation in conifers. Similar arguments were proposed for the detection of several grass MYB4 homologs binding to the promoters of genes involved in the lignin biosynthesis pathway, which was not in accordance with the expression of the MYB4 genes[43,44].

      The increase in lignin synthesis in response to shade in conifers[32,33] is a contrasting feature compared to angiosperms, where shade causes a decrease in lignin synthesis due to which the angiosperm becomes weak and susceptible to diseases[45,46]. The underlying mechanism, whether and how the MYB repressors may be involved in this process in conifers needs further research.

    • The sequence analysis suggests that although the domains of the MYB repressors from the lignin biosynthesis pathway are conserved among the angiosperms and gymnosperms in their N-terminal regions, they may possess diverse repressor domains in the C-terminal regions that have not been functionally characterized. Gymnosperms are ancient and functionally diverse compared to angiosperms in many ways. For example, comparative genome annotation studies revealed notable differences in the size of the NDH-complex gene family and the genes underlying the functional basis of response to shade suggesting specialization of the photosynthetic apparatus in Pinaceae[47]. Likewise, it is proposed that the lignin biosynthesis pathway in conifers may function through alternative mechanisms, unlike those observed in the angiosperms, as suggested by the study in Ginkgo[30]. Further investigation is required for functional validation of all the conifer MYB repressors discussed in this review aiming to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the repression of the conifer lignin biosynthesis pathway.

    • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Ranade SS; García-Gil MR; data collection: Ranade SS; analysis and interpretation of results: Ranade SS; draft manuscript preparation: Ranade SS; García-Gil MR. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    • All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

      • We acknowledge the support from FORMAS (FA-2021/0038) and Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Supplemental Table S1 List of sequences included in the alignments and phylogenetic tree.
      • Supplemental Fig. S1 Alignment of Arabidopsis thaliana MYB3 (AtMYB3), Gingko biloba MYB (GbMYBR1) and all MYB3-like copies from Picea abies (Pa).
      • Supplemental Fig. S2 Alignment of Arabidopsis thaliana MYB3 (AtMYB3), Gingko biloba MYB (GbMYBR1) and all MYB3-like copies from Pinus taeda (Pt).
      • Supplemental Fig. S3 Alignment of Arabidopsis thaliana MYB4 (AtMYB4), Gingko biloba MYB GbMYBR1) and all MYB4-like copies from Picea abies (Pa).
      • Supplemental Fig. S4 Alignment of Arabidopsis thaliana MYB4 (AtMYB4), Gingko biloba MYB (GbMYBR1) and all MYB4-like copies from Pinus taeda (Pt).
      • Supplemental Fig. S5 Alignment of the lignin repressor MYB members from gymnosperm and angiosperm species: MYB3-like and MYB4-like copies from Picea abies (Pa) and Pinus taeda (Pt) along with GbMYBR1 from Ginkgo biloba (Gb); CfMYB5 from Cryptomeria fortune (Cf); MYB3, MYB4, MYB7 and MYB32 from Arabidopsis thaliana (At); MYB156 and MYB221 from Populus trichocarpa (Potri); EgMYB1 from Eucalyptus gunnii (Eg); ZmMYB31 and ZmMYB42 from Zea mays (Zm) and PvMYB4 from Panicum virgatum (Pv). Alternative EAR domain in Pt_AtMYB4-like1, Pt_AtMYB4-like3, Pt_AtMYB4-like4 and Pa_AtMYB4-like1 are marked with box and, bold and underlined.
      • Copyright: © 2024 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (3)  References (47)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Ranade SS, García-Gil MR. 2024. Lignin biosynthesis pathway repressors in gymnosperms: differential repressor domains as compared to angiosperms. Forestry Research 4: e031 doi: 10.48130/forres-0024-0029
    Ranade SS, García-Gil MR. 2024. Lignin biosynthesis pathway repressors in gymnosperms: differential repressor domains as compared to angiosperms. Forestry Research 4: e031 doi: 10.48130/forres-0024-0029

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return