Search
2024 Volume 4
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Understanding physiological and biochemical mechanisms associated with post-harvest storage of Yam tuber (Dioscorea sp.)

More Information
  • Yam (Dioscorea sp.) is an economically important staple root tuber crop of tropical and subtropical regions. Tubers are nutritious and contain carbohydrates, proteins, micronutrients, vitamins, and several other beneficial compounds. Yam species differ in their biochemical constituents, dormancy period, and storability. Tubers are dormant after harvest and the duration of the dormancy period in yams varies from 50 to 210 d depending on species, genotype, cultural practices, growing, and storage conditions. Depending on the final usage, tubers can either be stored for short- or long-term periods under proper ventilation with 15−17 °C/70%−80% relative humidity. Post-harvest storage losses are one of the major constraints in yam production that limits its usage for human consumption and industrial purposes. Long-term storage causes tuber sprouting, transpiration, respiration, rotting, pathogen infestation, and other physiological losses. Both dormancy and storage can be manipulated using the application of synthetic chemical fungicides, bio-pesticides, and plant growth hormones such as gibberellic acid along with the proper storage practices. As both dormancy and storage of yams result in physiological, biochemical, and molecular changes, understanding key metabolites, genes, and regulatory pathways associated with these processes is necessary. This can be achieved by measuring rotting losses, weight loss, starch, and sugar content along with the associated enzymes and expression of key genes involved in starch-to-sugar conversion. The present review summarizes insights into post-harvest storage losses, dormancy, metabolomic, and transcriptomic approaches associated with yam tubers.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Srivastava AK, Gaisera T, Paethb H, Ewert F. 2012. The impact of climate change on Yam (Dioscorea alata) yield in the savanna zone of West Africa. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 153:57−64

    doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2012.03.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Dansi A, Dantsey-Barry H, Dossou-Aminon IN, N'Kpenu EK, Agré AP, et al. 2013. Varietal diversity and genetic erosion of cultivated yams (Dioscorea cayenensis Poir-D. rotundata Lam complex and D. alata L. in Togo. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation 5:223−39

    Google Scholar

    [3]

    Islam MT, Chowdhury R, Afroz R, Rahman S, Haque MM. 2011. Characterization and maintenance of yam (Dioscorea spp.) germplasm. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 36:605−21

    doi: 10.3329/bjar.v36i4.11748

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Jayakody L, Hoover R, Liu Q, Donner E. 2007. Studies on tuber starches. II. Molecular structure, composition and physicochemical properties of yam (Dioscorea sp.) starches grown in Sri Lanka. Carbohydrate Polymers 69:148−63

    doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2006.09.024

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Price EJ, Bhattacharjee R, Lopez-Montes A, Fraser PD. 2017. Metabolite profiling of yam (Dioscorea spp.) accessions for use in crop improvement programmes. Metabolomics 13:144

    doi: 10.1007/s11306-017-1279-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Omohimi CI, Piccirillo C, Roriz M, Ferraro V, Vasconcelos MW, et al. 2018. Study of the proximate and mineral composition of different Nigerian yam chips, flakes and flours. Journal of Food Science and Technology 55:42−51

    doi: 10.1007/s13197-017-2761-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    KC Y, Rajbanshi R, Katuwal N, Dhungana P, Subba D. 2021. Process optimization for yam flour incorporated in expanded extrudates. International Journal of Food Properties 24:1152−64

    doi: 10.1080/10942912.2021.1958839

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Padhan BM, Panda D. 2020. Nutritional, anti-nutritional and physico-functional properties of wild edible yam (Dioscorea spp.) tubers from Koraput, India. Food Bioscience 34:100527

    doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2020.100527

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Kumar S, Das G, Shin HS, Patra JK. 2017. Dioscorea spp. (a wild edible tuber): a study on its ethnopharmacological potential and traditional use by the local people of similipal biosphere reserve, India. Frontiers in Pharmacology 8:52

    doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00052

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Mohan VR, Kalidass C. 2010. Nutritional and antinutritional evaluation of some unconventional wild edible plants. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems 12:495−506

    Google Scholar

    [11]

    Polycarp D, Afoakwa EO, Budu AS, Otoo E. 2012. Characterization of chemical composition and anti-nutritional factors in seven species within the Ghanaian yam (Dioscorea) germplasm. International Food Research Journal 19:985−92

    Google Scholar

    [12]

    Maalekuu BK, Saajah JK, Addae AK. 2014. Effect of three Storage methods on the quality and shelf-life of white yam Dioscorea rotundata cultivars Pona and Tela. Journal of Agricultural Science 6:221−30

    doi: 10.5539/jas.v6n7p221

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Fauziah, Masudah S, Hapsari L, Nurfadilah S. 2020. Biochemical composition and nutritional value of fresh tuber of water yam (Dioscorea alata L.) local accessions from East Java, Indonesia. AGRIVITA Journal of Agricultural Science 42:255−71

    doi: 10.17503/agrivita.v0i0.2552

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Chandrasekara A, Kumar JT. 2016. Roots and tuber crops as functional foods: a review on phytochemical constituents and their potential health benefits. International Journal of Food Science 2016:3631647

    doi: 10.1155/2016/3631647

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Shajeela PS, Mohan VR, Louis Jesudas L, Tresina Soris P. 2011. Nutritional and antinutritional evaluation of wild yam Dioscorea spp. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems 14:723−30

    Google Scholar

    [16]

    Li Y, Ji S, Xu T, Zhong Y, Xu M, et al. 2023. Chinese yam (Dioscorea): nutritional value, beneficial effects, and food and pharmaceutical applications. Trends in Food Science & Technology 134:29−40

    doi: 10.1016/j.jpgs.2023.01.021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Wanasundera JPD, Ravindran G. 1994. Nutritional assessment of yam (Dioscorea alata) tubers. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 46:33−39

    doi: 10.1007/BF01088459

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Adepoju OT, Boyejo O, Adeniji PO. 2017. Nutrient and antinutrient composition of yellow yam (Dioscorea cayenensis) products. Data Brief 11:428−31

    doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2017.02.022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Jayasuriya A, Rathnayaka U. 2016. Investigation of nutritionalvalue of selected Sri Lankan traditional root and tubers. Journal of Biosciences 4:656−60

    Google Scholar

    [20]

    Otegbayo BO, Oguniyan DJ, Olunlade BA, Oroniran OO, Atobatele OE. 2018. Characterizing genotypic variation in biochemical composition, anti-nutritional and mineral bioavailability of some Nigerian yam (Dioscorea spp.) land races. Journal of Food Science and Technology 55:205−16

    doi: 10.1007/s13197-017-2913-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Doss A, Tresina PS, Mohan VR. 2019. Amino acid composition of wild yam (Dioscorea spp.). Food Research 3:617−21

    Google Scholar

    [22]

    Lebot V, Malapa R, Molisale T, Marchand JL. 2005. Physicochemical characterization of yam (Dioscorea alata L.) tubers from Vanuatu. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 53:1199−208

    doi: 10.1007/s10722-005-2013-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Bhandari MR, Kasai T, Kawabata J. 2003. Nutritional evaluation of wild yam (Dioscorea spp.) tubers of Nepal. Food Chemistry 82:619−23

    doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(03)00019-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Dutta B. 2015. Food and medicinal values of certain species of Dioscorea with special reference to Assam. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 3:15−18

    Google Scholar

    [25]

    Tao X, Yin L, Xu L, Peng J. 2018. Dioscin: a diverse acting natural compound with therapeutic potential in metabolic diseases, cancer, inflammation and infections. Pharmacological Research 137:259−69

    doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2018.09.022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Epping J, Laibach N. 2020. An underutilized orphan tuber crop—Chinese yam: a review. Planta 252:58

    doi: 10.1007/s00425-020-03458-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Zhao C, Li X, Miao J, Jing S, Li X, et al. 2017. The effect of different extraction techniques on property and bioactivity of polysaccharides from Dioscorea hemsleyi. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 102:847−56

    doi: 10.1016/jijbiomac.2017.04.031

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Yang L, Liu X, Zhuang X, Feng X, Zhong L, et al. 2018. Antifungal effects of saponin extract from rhizomes of Dioscorea panthaica Prain et Burk against Candida albicans. Evidence Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2018:6095307

    doi: 10.1155/2018/6095307

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Tang Y, He X, Ye M, Huang H, Chen H, et al. 2015. Cardioprotective effect of total saponins from three medicinal species of Dioscorea against isoprenaline-induced myocardial ischemia. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 175:451−55

    doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.10.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Tewtrakul S, Itharat A. 2007. Nitric oxide inhibitory substances from the rhizomes of Dioscorea membranacea. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 109:412−16

    doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2006.08.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Panthong S, Ruangnoo S, Thongdeeying P, Sriwanthana B, Itharat A. 2014. Immunomodulatory activity of Dioscorea membranacea Pierre rhizomes and of its main active constituent Dioscorealide B. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 16:403

    doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-14-403

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Thongdeeying P, Itharat A, Umehara K, Ruangnoo S. 2016. A novel steroid and cytotoxic constituents from Dioscorea membranacea Pierre against hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma cells. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 194:91−97

    doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2016.08.037

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Theerasin S, Baker AT. 2009. Analysis and identification of phenolic compounds in Dioscorea hispida Dennst. Asian Journal of Food and Agro-Industry 2:547−60

    Google Scholar

    [34]

    Ashri A, Amalina N, Kamil A, Fazry S, Sairi MF, et al. 2018. Modified Dioscorea hispida starch-based hydrogels and their in-vitro cytotoxicity study on small intestine cell line (FHS-74 Int). International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 107:2412−21

    doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.10.125

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Rakotobe L, Berkal M, Huet H, Djediat C, Jeannoda V, et al. 2010. Effects of madagascar yam extracts, Dioscorea antaly, on embryo-larval development of medaka fish, Oryzias latipes. Toxicon 55:87−91

    doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.07.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Kundu BB, Vanni K, Farheen A, Jha P, Pandey DK, et al. 2021. Dioscorea bulbifera L. (Dioscoreaceae): a review of its ethnobotany, pharmacology and conservation needs. South African Journal of Botany 140:365−74

    doi: 10.1016/j.sajb.2020.07.028

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Zhou Q, Yu D, Zhang C, Liu S, Lu F. 2014. Total saponins from Discorea nipponica ameliorate urate excretion in hyperuricemic mice. Planta Medica 80:1259−68

    doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1383048

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Surarit W, Nuengchamnong N, Hansakul P. 2021. Protective effects of Dioscorea birmanica extract against oxidative stress-induced damage in cultured normal hepatocytes and its phytochemical constituents. Food Bioscience 41:101030

    doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2021.101030

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Chen Y, Chen X, Xiang T, Sun B, Luo H, et al. 2016. Total saponins from Dioscorea septemloba thunb reduce serum uric acid levels in rats with hyperuricemia through OATP1A1 up-regulation. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology - Medical Science 36:237−42

    doi: 10.1007/s11596-016-1573-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Hazrin-Chong NH, Azeem AM, Nik Mat Zin NNI, Shah Mat Lazim MA. 2018. Effectiveness of Dioscorea hispida Dennst as antibacterial and antibiofilm agent. Malaysian journal of Microbiology 14:462−67

    doi: 10.21161/mjm.1461803

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Miah MM, Das P, Ibrahim Y, Shajib MS, Rashid MA. 2018. In vitro antioxidant, antimicrobial, membrane stabilization and thrombolytic activities of Dioscorea hispida Dennst. European Journal of Integrative Medicine 19:121−27

    doi: 10.1016/j.eujim.2018.02.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Boudjada A, Touil A, Bensouici C, Bendif H, Rhouati S. 2019. Phenanthrene and dihydrophenanthrene derivatives from Dioscorea communis with anticholinesterase, and antioxidant activities. Natural Product Research 33:3278−82

    doi: 10.1080/14786419.2018.1468328

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Lim JS, Hahn D, Gu MJ, Oh J, Lee JS, et al. 2019. Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of 2, 7-dihydroxy-4, 6-dimethoxy phenanthrene isolated from Dioscorea batatas Decne. Applied Biological Chemistry 69:29

    doi: 10.1186/s13765-019-0436-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Khan TMA, Kakde UB. 2014. Biodiversity in wild vegetables of Konkan region – Maharashtra. International Journal of Research in Biosciences, Agriculture & Technology 2:226−40

    doi: 10.29369/ijrbat.2014.02.ii.0087

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Jadhav VD, Mahadkar SD, Valvi SR. 2011. Documentation and ethnobotanical survey of wild edible plants from Kolhapur District. Recent Research in Science and Technology 3:58−63

    Google Scholar

    [46]

    Kamble SY, Patil SR, Sawant PS, Sawant S, Pawar SG, et al. 2010. Studies on plants used in traditional medicine by Bhilla tribe of Maharashtra. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 9:591−98

    Google Scholar

    [47]

    Srivastava RC. 2010. Traditional knowledge of Nyishi (Daffla) tribe of Arunachal Pradesh. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 9:26−37

    Google Scholar

    [48]

    Edison S, Unnikrishnan M, Vimala B, Pillai SV, Sheela MN, et al. 2006. Biodiversity of tropical tuber crops in India. NBA Scientific Bulletin No. 7, National Biodiversity Authority. Chennai, India. 60 pp.

    [49]

    Kumar S, Satpathy MK. 2011. Medicinal plants in an urban environment: plants in an urban environment; herbaceous medicinal flora from the campus of Regional Institute of education, Bhubaneswar, Odisha. International Journal of Pharmacy & Life Sciences 2:1206−10

    Google Scholar

    [50]

    Mishra S, Swain S, Chaudhary SS, Ray T. 2008. Wild edible tubers (Dioscorea spp.) and their contribution to the food security of tribes of Jaypore tract, Orissa, India. Plant Genetic Resources 156:63−67

    Google Scholar

    [51]

    Tamiru M, Natsume S, Takagi H, White B, Yaegashi H, et al. 2017. Genome sequencing of the staple food crop white Guinea yam enables the development of a molecular marker for sex determination. BMC Biology 15:86

    doi: 10.1186/s12915-017-0419-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Nwogha JS, Wosene AG, Raveendran M, Obidiegwu JE, Oselebe HO, et al. 2023. Comparative metabolomics profiling reveals key metabolites and associated pathways regulating Ttuber dormancy in white yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir.). Metabolites 13:610

    doi: 10.3390/metabo13050610

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Sharma S, Gupta R, Deswal R. 2017. Dioscorea alata tuber proteome analysis shows over thirty dioscorin isoforms and novel tuber proteins. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 114:128−37

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.03.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Wu Z, Jiang W, Tao Z, Pan X, Yu W, et al. 2020. Morphological and stage-specific transcriptome analyses reveal distinct regulatory programs underlying yam (Dioscorea alata L.) bulbil growth. Journal of Experimental Botany 71:1899−914

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz552

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Wu Z, Jiang W, Nitin M, Bao X, Chen S, et al. 2016. Characterizing diversity based on nutritional and bioactive compositions of yam germplasm (Dioscorea spp.) commonly cultivated in China. Journal of Food and Drug Analysis 24:367−75

    doi: 10.1016/j.jfda.2015.12.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Nwogha JS, Wosene AG, Raveendran M, Oselebe HO, Obidiegwu JE, et al. 2022. Physiological and molecular basis of dormancy in yam tuber: a way forward towards genetic manipulation of dormancy in yam tubers. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research 22:49−75

    Google Scholar

    [57]

    Mounirou Y, Jeanne Z, Djakaridia T, Sèssi Ida A, Elie Idossou A, et al. 2015. Evaluation of yam (Dioscorea cayenensis–Dioscorea rotundata) seed germination grown in Centre Benin. International Journal of Advanced Research 3:277−284

    Google Scholar

    [58]

    Ile EI, Craufurd PQ, Battey NH, Asiedu R. 2006. Phases of dormancy in yam tubers (Dioscorea rotundata). Annals of Botany 97:497−504

    doi: 10.1093/aob/mcl002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Martin FW, Sadik S. 1977. Tropical yams and their potential. Part 4. Dioscorea rotundata and Dioscorea cayenensis. Handbook No. 502, USDA Agriculture. 40 pp.

    [60]

    Craufurd PQ, Summerfield RJ, Asiedu R, Vara Prasad PV. 2001. Dormancy in yams. Experimental Agriculture 37:147−81

    doi: 10.1017/S001447970100206X

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Shiwachi H, Ayankanmi T, Asiedu R, Onjo M. 2003. Induction of germination in dormant yam (Dioscorea spp.) tubers with inhibitors of gibberellins. Experimental Agriculture 39:209−17

    doi: 10.1017/S001447970200114X

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Hamadina EI, Craufurd PQ. 2015. Changes in free phenolics contents during tuber development, dormancy and sprouting in white Yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir.). International Journal of Plant Research 5:34−41

    Google Scholar

    [63]

    Shangguan L, Chen M, Fang X, Xie Z, Gong P, et al. 2020. Comparative transcriptome analysis provides insight into regulation pathways and temporal and spatial expression characteristics of grapevine (Vitis vinifera) dormant buds in different nodes. BMC Plant Biology 20:390

    doi: 10.1186/s12870-020-02583-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Nwogha JS, Abtew WG, Raveendran M, Oselebe HO, Obidiegwu JE, et al. 2023. Role of non-structural sugar metabolism in regulating tuber dormancy in white yam (Dioscorea rotundata). Agriculture 13:343

    doi: 10.3390/agriculture13020343

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Ravi V, Aked J, Balagopalan C. 1996. Review on tropical root and tuber crops I. Storage methods and quality changes. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 36:661−709

    doi: 10.1080/10408399609527744

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Aidoo AK. 2015. Bioactivity of Zingeber officinale and Piper nigrum plant extraction controlling post-harvest white yam(Dioscorea rotundata) tuber rot fungi. African Journal of Microbiology Research 9:1499−503

    doi: 10.5897/AJMR2015.7499

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Nweke FU. 2015. Effect of some plant leaf extracts on mycelia growth and spore germination of Botryodiplodia theobromae causal organism of yam tuber rot. Journal of Biology, Agriculrure and Healthcare 5:67−71

    Google Scholar

    [68]

    Adeniji A. 2019. The methods of controlling yam tuber rot in storage: a review. International Journal of Innovations in Biological and Chemical Sciences 12:11−17

    Google Scholar

    [69]

    Claudius AO, Kenyon L, y Coyne DL. 2017. Effect of pre-plant treatments of yam (Dioscorea rotundata) setts on the production of healthy seed yam, seed yam storage and consecutive ware tuber production. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Subtropics 118:297−306

    Google Scholar

    [70]

    Ezeike GOI. 1984. An analysis of weight loss of stored yam Dioscorea Spp. tubers. Canadian Agricultural Engineering 26:115−19

    Google Scholar

    [71]

    Trèche S, Agbor-Egbe T. 1996. Biochemical changes occurring during growth and storage of two yam species. International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition 47:93−102

    doi: 10.3109/09637489609012570

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Aidoo AK. 2015. Improving pit storage systems to reduce rots of white yam (Dioscorea rotundata) in Ghana. Science Journal of Agricultural Research and Management 2015:sjarm-288

    Google Scholar

    [73]

    Oyewumi A, Oladimeji AO, Imoukhuede OB, Sunday A. 2019. Investigation into the post harvest losses of white yam (Dioscorea rotundata) during storage in yam barn and platform structures. European Journal of Advances in Engineering and Technology 6:20−25

    Google Scholar

    [74]

    Ravindran G, Wanasundera JPD. 1993. Chemical changes in yam tubers Dioscorea alata and D. esculenta during storage. Tropical Science 33:57−62

    Google Scholar

    [75]

    Osunde ZD, Orhevba, BA. 2009. Effects of storage conditions and storage period on nutritional and other qualities of stored yam (Dioscorea spp.) tubers. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development 9:678−91

    doi: 10.4314/ajfand.v9i2.19219

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Adu-Gyamfi R, Blay ET. 2009. Influence of storage duration and growth regulators on sprouting and field performance of yam (Dioscorea rotundata poir.) minisett. Journal of Root Crops 35:219−25

    Google Scholar

    [77]

    Gwa VI, Ekefan E. 2021. Potential for biological control of postharvest fungal rot of white yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir) tubers in storage with Trichoderma harzianum. Virology & Mycology 10:1−6

    Google Scholar

    [78]

    Eze SC, Eze EI, Ameh GI, Dansi A. 2023. Effect of some botanical extracts on postharvest losses of yam (Dioscorea rotundata) in improved yam barn in Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology 12:1962−67

    doi: 10.5897/ajb12.754

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Aghale DN, Umeh OJ, Onyenobi FI. 2016. Post harvest studies on yam tubers Dioscorea rotundata Poir. pre-treated with bio- pesticides against soil pests and pathogen. Journal of Plant Science and Research 3:146

    Google Scholar

    [80]

    Dje MK, Dabonne S, Guehi ST, Kouame LP. 2010. Effects of post-harvest storage on some biochemical parameters of different parts of two yams species (Dioscorea spp). International Scholars Journals 1:001−009

    Google Scholar

    [81]

    Dabonne S, Dje KM, Konan HK, Kouame LP. 2011. Enzymatic profile of different parts of yam (Dioscorea) tuber during storage. Agriculture and Biology Journal of North America 2:591−97

    doi: 10.5251/abjna.2011.2.4.591.597

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    Eze SC, Eze EI, Ameh GI, Dansi A. 2012. Effect of some botanical extracts on post-harvest losses of yam (Dioscorea rotundata) in improved yam barn in Nigeria. African Journal of Biotechnology 12:1962−67

    doi: 10.5897/AJB12.754

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Akinbo OK. 2019. Pre and post-harvest studies of yam diseases and their control measures in Southeastern Nigeria. Nigerian Agricultural Journal 50:193−97

    Google Scholar

    [84]

    Afoakwa EO, Polycarp D, Budu AS, Mensah-brown H, Otoo E. 2013. Variability in biochemical composition and cell wall constituents among seven varieties in Ghanaian yam (Dioscorea sp.) germplasm. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development 13:8106−27

    doi: 10.18697/ajfand.59.13280

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Hamadina EI. 2015. Dry matter, free sugar and starch changes in tuber regions of white yam (Dioscorea rotundata Poir.) , and the effect of storage environment. Journal of Advances in Agriculture 4:303−09

    doi: 10.24297/jaa.v4i1.4298

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86]

    Moses O, Osinfade, Gbolahan B. 2017. Determination of sugars in yams under storage during the dry season. Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology 11:24−27

    Google Scholar

    [87]

    Darkwa K, Olasanmi B, Asiedu R, Asfaw A. 2020. Review of empirical and emerging breeding methods and tools for yam (Dioscorea spp.) improvement: status and prospects. Plant Breeding 139:474−97

    doi: 10.1111/pbr.12783

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88]

    Mignouna HD, Abang MM, Asiedu R. 2008. Genomics of yams, a common source of food and medicine in the tropics. In Genomics of Tropical Crop Plants, eds Moore PH, Ming R. vol 1. Springer, New York, NY. pp. 549–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71219-2_23

    [89]

    Siadjeu C, Mayland-Quellhorst E, Pande S, Laubinger S, Albach DC. 2021. Transcriptome sequence reveals candidate genes involving in the post-harvest hardening of trifoliate yam Dioscorea dumetorum. Plants 10:787

    doi: 10.3390/plants10040787

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Cao T, Wang S, Ali A, Shan N, Sun J, et al. 2023. Transcriptome and metabolome analysis reveals the potential mechanism of tuber dynamic development in yam (Dioscorea polystachya Turcz.). LWT 181:114764

    doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.114764

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91]

    Trimanto, Hapsari L. 2015. Diversity and utilization of (Dioscorea spp.) tuber as alternative food source in Nganjuk Regency, East Java. AGRIVITA Journal of Agriculture Science 37:97−107

    doi: 10.17503/agrivita-2015-37-2-p097-107

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92]

    Price EJ, Bhattacharjee R, Lopez-Montes A, Fraser PD. 2018. Carotenoid profiling of yams: clarity, comparisons and diversity. Food Chemistry 259:130−38

    doi: 10.1016/jfoodchem2018.03.066

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93]

    Wu Z, Jiang W, Mantri N, Bao X, Chen S, et al. 2015. Transciptome analysis reveals flavonoid biosynthesis regulation and simple sequence repeats in yam (Dioscorea alata L.) tubers. BMC Genomics 16:346

    doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-1547-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94]

    Yan L, Yang H, Ye Q, Huang Z, Zhou H, et al. 2022. Metabolome and transcriptome profiling reveal regulatory network and mechanism of flavonoid biosynthesis during color formation of Dioscorea cirrhosa L. Peer J 10:e13659

    doi: 10.7717/peerj.13659

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95]

    Syombua ED, Tripathi JN, Obiero GO, Nguu EK, Yang B, et al. 2022. Potential applications of the CRISPR/Cas technology for genetic improvement of yam (Dioscorea spp.). Food and Energy Security 11:e330

    doi: 10.1002/fes3.330

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Datir S, Kumbhar R, Kumatkar P. 2024. Understanding physiological and biochemical mechanisms associated with post-harvest storage of Yam tuber (Dioscorea sp.). Technology in Horticulture 4: e004 doi: 10.48130/tihort-0024-0001
    Datir S, Kumbhar R, Kumatkar P. 2024. Understanding physiological and biochemical mechanisms associated with post-harvest storage of Yam tuber (Dioscorea sp.). Technology in Horticulture 4: e004 doi: 10.48130/tihort-0024-0001

Figures(1)  /  Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(967) PDF downloads(205)

Other Articles By Authors

REVIEW   Open Access    

Understanding physiological and biochemical mechanisms associated with post-harvest storage of Yam tuber (Dioscorea sp.)

Technology in Horticulture  4 Article number: e004  (2024)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Yam (Dioscorea sp.) is an economically important staple root tuber crop of tropical and subtropical regions. Tubers are nutritious and contain carbohydrates, proteins, micronutrients, vitamins, and several other beneficial compounds. Yam species differ in their biochemical constituents, dormancy period, and storability. Tubers are dormant after harvest and the duration of the dormancy period in yams varies from 50 to 210 d depending on species, genotype, cultural practices, growing, and storage conditions. Depending on the final usage, tubers can either be stored for short- or long-term periods under proper ventilation with 15−17 °C/70%−80% relative humidity. Post-harvest storage losses are one of the major constraints in yam production that limits its usage for human consumption and industrial purposes. Long-term storage causes tuber sprouting, transpiration, respiration, rotting, pathogen infestation, and other physiological losses. Both dormancy and storage can be manipulated using the application of synthetic chemical fungicides, bio-pesticides, and plant growth hormones such as gibberellic acid along with the proper storage practices. As both dormancy and storage of yams result in physiological, biochemical, and molecular changes, understanding key metabolites, genes, and regulatory pathways associated with these processes is necessary. This can be achieved by measuring rotting losses, weight loss, starch, and sugar content along with the associated enzymes and expression of key genes involved in starch-to-sugar conversion. The present review summarizes insights into post-harvest storage losses, dormancy, metabolomic, and transcriptomic approaches associated with yam tubers.

    • Wild tubers are an important alternative source of food which also have medicinal properties. Among them, Dioscorea (yam) is the fourth most staple edible root and tuber vegetable after potato, cassava, and sweet potato[1, 2]. It is a pantropical genus distributed in the tropical, subtropical, and temperate regions of the world comprised of eight genera and 880 species[3]. Among various genera, white yam (D. rotundata), water yam or greater yam (D. alata), yellow yam (D. cayenensis), trifoliate yam (D. dumetorum), aerial yam (D. Bulbifera) and Chinese yam or lesser yam (D. esculenta) are edible and suitable for human consumption. Yam species not only differ in their color (white, ivory, yellow, purple, etc.), flavor, but also in their shape with long and cylindrical sharps. Also the exterior texture of some species of yam tubers is rough and scaly[4, 5]. Yams are consumed both in the form of processed and cooked foods that includes flour, flakes, chips, fried yam, boiled yam, and dry-roasted slices or pounded yam[6, 7]. Yams are both nutritionally as well as medicinally important in providing food for local and tribal communities[8, 9]. The nutritional compositions and bioactive compounds of yams vary from species to species. Table 1 contains the nutritional information of yams. Tubers of yam contain starch, amino acids, proteins, lipids, fats, vitamins, and minerals[1012]. Studies reported that minerals such as Potassium, Calcium, Magnesium, Iron, Zinc, and Phosphorus are present in the tubers of Dioscorea species. However, Sodium is not detected in most of the Dioscorea species[12, 13]. Dioscorea has been reported to provide more dietary protein than other roots and tuber crops, such as cassava[14]. Species also contain antinutritional substances such as total free phenolics, tannins, hydrogen cyanide, total oxalate, amylase, and trypsin inhibitor[15].

      Table 1.  Nutritional and antinutritional content in Dioscorea sp.

      NutrientPercentage (%)Reference
      Starch75.6−84.3[16,17]
      Protein2.62−10[16,18]
      Fat0.22−1.71[16,19]
      Crude fibre0.17−1.8[16,17]
      Amylose15.1−27.0[20]
      Aspartic acid5.21−9.36[21]
      Glutamic acid3.20−8.12[21]
      Lipid0.03−10.2[10]
      Ash2.50−4.90[22]
      Vitamin C0.013−0.025[17]
      Phytic acid0.059−0.20[17]
      Total oxalate0.49 -0.78[17]
      K0.25−0.56[23]
      Na0.0041−0.018[23]
      P0.033−0.062[23]
      Ca0.14−0.047[23]
      Mg0.018−0.027[23]
      Cu0.0001−0.00021[23]
      Fe0.00039−0.0029[23]
      Mn0.00014−0.00035[23]
      Zn0.00022−0.00053[23]

      Table 2 summarizes the medicinal properties of yams. Some levels of steroid saponins and sapogenins, such as diosgenin are present in Dioscorea tubers, which can be used as an anti-inflammatory, androgenic estrogenic, and contraceptive drugs[24]. Secondary metabolites discovered from root and tubers of Dioscorea sp. include dioscin, gracillin, saponins, phenanthrenes, anthocyanins, flavonoids, and phenolic acids etc.[24, 25]. Various secondary metabolites identified from Dioscorea sp. exhibited anticancer activity properties and were found effective in treating asthma, fever, diarrhea, swellings, scorpion stings, stomach pain, jaundice, and snake bites[2426]. The rhizome of Dioscorea hemsleyi showed antidiabetic and antioxidant activity[27]. Dioscorea panthaica rhizome exhibited antitumor, anti-hypercholesterolemic effects, anti-platelet aggregation activity and antifungal activity[28,29]. Dioscorea membranacea rhizome used for anti-inflammatory activity[30], immunomodulatory activity, and anticancer activity[31,32]. The tuber and tendrils of Dioscorea hispida showed antioxidant activity[33] and revealed no toxicity on small intestine cells[34]. The tubers of Dioscorea antaly are used as the treatment of toxicity in embryo-larval development[35].

      Table 2.  Medicinal properties of Dioscorea sp.

      Dioscorea sp.DiseaseReference
      Dioscorea bulbiferaGoiter, skin infections & oncological diseases[36]
      Dioscorea nipponicaArthritis, cough, asthma, & circulatory disorders, reduce pain & inflammation[37]
      Dioscorea villosaIntestinal disorders & hormone replacement therapy[24]
      Dioscorea birmanicaChronic diseases[38]
      Dioscorea septembolaTreatment of gout[39]
      Dioscorea hispidaChemotherapy, blood glucose[40, 41]
      Dioscorea batatas, Dioscorea rotundata and Dioscorea communisAntifungal and antioxidant[42, 43]
      Dioscorea digitataSyphilis, gonorrhoea, hydrocele, goiter, piles, dysentery.[44]
      Dioscorea alataPiles, weakness, kill stomach worm[45, 46]
      Dioscorea belophylla (Prain)Fever, malaria, headache, and dysentery[47]
      Dioscorea dumetorumJaundice[48]
      Dioscorea pentaphyllaDigestive tract problems,
      skin infections
      [24,49]
      Dioscorea puberaWeakness[49]
      Dioscorea hamiltoniiPiles[50]

      Yams have been regarded as an underutilized crop for a long time and have rarely attracted the attention of researchers[51]. So far most of the research has been conducted on understanding the storage of yam tubers under different storage structures and growth conditions. Research also focused on the impact of various storage conditions on tuber physiology. Understanding the regulatory pathways underlying physiological and biochemical mechanisms during the storage of yam tubers will be helpful in manipulating tuber storage and processing quality. Recently, advances in transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics, approaches have been applied in yams to understand the functioning of genes, proteins, and metabolites respectively involved in various physiological processes in yams[52, 53]. Transcriptome revealed genes involved in molecular mechanisms underlying various physiological and developmental processes in yams[54]. Likewise, the proteome produces a detailed analysis of key proteins and the information on regulation of yam storage proteins[53]. Identification and characterization of complete metabolomic profiling in yams are important to determine their diversity and suitability for food and medicine applications[55]. The present review summarizes insights into tuber dormancy, post-harvest storage losses, biochemical, and molecular approaches associated with yam tubers (Fig. 1).

      Figure 1. 

      Post-harvest storage losses, biochemical and molecular approaches associated with yam tubers.

    • After harvest, yam tubers undergo a natural dormancy period. Once the dormancy ends tubers sprout and new shoots are produced. Yam production is highly seasonal mainly due to tuber dormancy and the duration of tuber dormancy. Dormancy has economic and agricultural significance[52,56]. The duration of the dormancy period in yams varies from 30 to 210 d depending on species, genotype, cultural practices, growing, and storage conditions[57,58]. For example, D. cayenensis, exhibits a shorter dormancy period than D. rotundata. D. alata originating from Asia exhibits longer dormancy than D. rotundata originating from the savanna zone of West Africa. Dioscorea alata (greater yam) and Dioscorea rotundata (white yam) become ready for harvest by 8−10 months (240−300 d) after planting. The duration of tuber dormancy (between harvesting and sprouting) in Dioscorea alata is 98−126 d while it is 14−112 d in Dioscorea rotundata[5760].

      Duration of dormancy is very important which determines the time for which the tubers may be stored, and yam plantation programs can be planned. Therefore, depending on the final use and marketing strategies, tuber sprouting can either be delayed or broken by inducing early sprouting. Breaking tuber dormancy would be extremely useful to plant breeders and farmers so that more than one generation could be grown each year. On the other hand, prolonging the tuber dormancy period during storage has significance in terms of yam food quality[60]. Yam tubers are consumed either in the form of cooked or processed food products. For fresh preparations, long tuber dormancy is very important, and therefore, long dormancy is a desirable attribute in yam breeding[61]. However, the underlying metabolic changes and function of key genes that take place during dormancy and sprouting of yam tubers are not investigated in detail[61]. Ile et al.[58] proposed three phases of dormancy in D. rotundata yams: Phase I (tuber initiation to the appearance of tuber germinating meristem). Phase I of dormancy is the period during which no active meristematic activity (tuber germinating meristem) was observed and were therefore dormant. Phase I is the longest phase lasting for approx. 220 d, and an endo-dormant phase. Under this phase, plant growth regulators were unable to trigger tuber germinating meristem formation. The other two phases (II and III) are shorter (< 70 d in total) and proposed as endo-/eco-dormant phases. Phase II starts with the appearance of the tuber germinating meristem to initiation of foliar primordium. The duration of this phase was about 35 d. Plant growth regulators did not induce the formation of a tuber germinating meristem; however, they did influence tuber germinating meristem development (number of cell layers) and the rate/progress of shoot apical development. This phase ends with the appearance of the foliar primordium. Phase III of dormancy period initiates from the development of the complete shoot apical bud/foliar primordium to the appearance of shoot buds at the surface/sprouting loci. The duration of phase III is about 10 d. Both II and III are influenced by exogenous plant growth hormones as well as environmental conditions[58, 60].

      Tuber dormancy is the major cause of ware and seed tubers' inability to sprout for a prolonged period, during which tubers remain dormant; incapable of developing internal or external shoot buds/sprouts for about 150 to 210 d depending on: species, genotype, and growing and storage environmental conditions[1012]. Thus, this makes it impossible to have more than one crop cycle per year, thereby limiting yam crop productivity, and tuber availability for industrial use, and slowing down the rate of genetic improvement [13]. The ability to control yam tuber dormancy is necessary to provide uniform sprouting times that would enable farmers and industry to manage the crop production strategies so that two crop cycles can be managed. For instance, Dioscorea alata grows for 8−10 months and tubers remain dormant for 2−4 months. Hence two crops per year are practically not feasible. Ile et al.[58] concluded that phase I of dormancy lasts for 220 d. Two crop cycles of yams are feasible if the duration of dormancy Phase I (220 d long) is shortened, off-season plantation and more than one generation per year of yams is feasible[58]. This will be beneficial to yam industries as tubers will be available for round-the year processing and other purposes. Dormancy and sprouting in Dioscorea sp. can be controlled using gibberellic acids (GA3) (150 and 1,000 mg·L−1) and by inhibitors of GA biosynthesis such as 2-chloroethyltrimethyl-ammonium chloride (40 and 60 mL–1), Prohexadione-calcium (10 mg·kg−1) etc.[58, 61]. Hamandia & Carufurd[62] studied the effects of 2-chloroethanol (CLE, 4% and 6%), GA3 (150 and 1,000 mg·L−1), thiourea (2%), ethephon (1,000 mg·L−1), and CLE/thiourea combination on tubers of D. rotundata. Their results revealed that a combination of CLE/thiourea (6% and 2%) shortened the duration of sprouting by up to 32 d. GA3 (1,000 mg·L−1) prolonged the duration of sprouting in D. rotundata tubers. Gibberellins are used to break the dormancy in several crops however, it tends to prolong the duration of dormancy in some species of yam. A high concentration of GA3 (1,000 mg·L−1 prolonged dormancy while low concentrations (≤ 150 mg·L−1) of GA3 produced both shortening and prolonging effects in D. rotundata. Such an effect can be dependent on the age of the tubers[62]. However, these studies are inconclusive. Besides, the physiological, biochemical, and molecular control mechanisms involved in yam tuber dormancy are not investigated in detail. Studying the effects of hormones and their role during dormancy and sprouting will identify the hormonal network involved in governing these processes.

      Transcriptomics and metabolomic approaches identified the underlying genetic factors involved in the regulation of yam tuber dormancy. Using an untargeted GC-MS approach, profiling of two white yam genotypes (Obiaoturugo and TDr1100873) of D. rotundata identified differentially accumulated metabolites from dormancy induction to dormancy breaking phases[63]. Among all the metabolites, yam tuber dormancy induction and maintenance stages were found to be positively regulated by amines and biogenic polyamines, amino acids and derivatives, alcohols, flavonoids, alkaloids, phenols, esters, coumarins, and phytohormone. Dormancy breaking and sprouting stages were positively regulated by fatty acids, lipids, nucleotides, carboxylic acids, sugars, terpenoids, benzoquinones, and benzene derivatives in tubers of both yam genotypes[63]. Further linoleic acid metabolic pathway, phenylalanine metabolic pathway, galactose metabolic pathway, starch and sucrose metabolic pathway, alanine-aspartate-glutamine metabolic pathways, and purine metabolic pathway were significantly impacted yam tuber dormancy. Metabolomic approaches can be further explored to identify starch-sugar conversion process under storage. Such study can be utilized for understanding tuber dormancy mechanism in different yam species. In another study, profiling of non-structural sugar parameters, dry matter, and moisture content classified Obiaoturugo as a short dormant phenotype and whereas TDr1100873 exhibited a long dormant phenotype[64]. Their study concluded that sugar metabolites can be useful in manipulation of dormancy in different yam species. Detailed studies investigating the role of key candidate metabolites and associated genes will provide potential for manipulation of yam tuber dormancy using biotechnological tools to develop agronomically desired tuber dormancy phenotype[56].

    • The perishability, pre-harvest factors, and postharvest storage losses of root and tuber crops are the major constraints in the utilization of these crops[65] for human consumption and industrial purposes. Although yam tubers are consumed as a fresh commodity, due to their nutritional and medicinal properties, the industrial demand for yams is increasing. Yams are best planted at the beginning of the rainy season. Planting is done between late January and April in West Africa coinciding with the start of the rains, although early plantings in November–December are also recommended. In India, it is planted between May and June. It grows in warm, sunny climates with temperatures between 25 °C and 30 °C. Short days of 10−11 h result in tuber formation, while days longer than 12 h favor vine growth. Yams require deep, loose, and textured loamy soil that is rich in organic matter. Dioscorea alata (Greater yam) and Dioscorea rotundata (white yam) become ready for harvest by 8−10 months (270−300 d) after planting. However, its production is limited by long-growing cycle (9−11 months), dormancy, and post-harvest storage losses[21, 58].

      Post-harvest storage losses include weight loss, rotting loss, increased sugars, decreased nutrient levels, as well as processing quality. The losses can be high, which only affects not only economic value but also the seed planting material required by farmers. Aidoo[66] reported that due to the poor storability of yams, farmers often sell the tubers immediately after harvest at cheaper rates yielding low income or reduced profits. After harvesting depending on their final usage, short-term and long–term storage of tubers is mandatory. However, storage causes sprouting, transpiration, respiration, rotting, pathogen infestation, and other physiological losses[67, 68]. For long-term yam tuber storage and maintaining the chemical quality, a good storage structure with controlled conditions with proper ventilation system is necessary to maintain tubers in their most edible and marketable condition[12]. Good storage prevents moisture losses, spoilage by pathogens, attack by insects and animals, and controls sprout growth in yam tubers[12, 68].

      Table 3 summarizes some examples of the effects of different post-harvest storage systems/structures, temperature, and storage duration on yam tuber quality. Previous studies revealed that post-harvest yam tuber quality is affected by cultivar type, storage structure, temperature, relative humidity (RH), chemical treatments, bio-pesticides, fungicides, storage structure, etc. Post-harvest rotting and weight losses of yams can be avoided using healthy seed material for plantation, crop rotations, fallowing, destruction of diseased, and unhealthy/infected seed/plant material, pre-treatment with nematicides (carbofuran granular), dipping of seeds in Nemacuron or treating seed material with wood ash[69]. Claudius et al.[69] reported that the use of pesticides, hot water treatment, and neem extract to seed tubers before plantation resulted in reduced post-harvest storage losses in Dioscorea rotundata.

      Table 3.  Effects of post-harvest storage on yam tuber quality.

      SpeciesTreatmentParameterQuantitative dataReference
      Effects of storage structures, storage temperature and duration
      Dioscorea rotundataUnderground pit structure
      (25 °C, 24 weeks)
      Increased wight loss13.2%−33.4%[70]
      Dioscorea rotundata cv. Oshei and Dioscorea dumetorum cv. JakiriPrevailing tropical ambient conditions (18−31 °C, 16 weeks)Increased weight loss
      Decreased in starch content
      31%
      3.5%−4.5%
      [71]
      Dioscorea alata and Dioscorea esculenta(29 °C, 21 weeks)Increased weight loss
      Decreased proteins, starch etc.

      [74]
      Dioscorea
      roundata cv. Giwa
      Yam barn
      (fluctuating temperature, 26 weeks)
      Increased rotting loss
      Increased weight loss
      Reduction in nutritional content
      12%
      4.7%
      [75]
      Dioscorea cayenensis rotundata complex cv. Krenglè and D. alata cv. FloridoHeap aired store and stored under prevailing tropical ambient conditions (26.5 °C, 26 weeks)Increased reducing sugars
      Increased total sugars
      7%−9%
      1%
      [80]
      Dioscorea cayenensis rotundata complex cv. Krenglè and cv. KangbaHeap aired store and stored under prevailing tropical ambient conditions (26.5 °C, 26 weeks)
      Increased amylase and cellulase
      Decreased α-mannosidases and phospatases
      [81]
      Effects of fungicides/pesticides/medicinal plants extracts etc.
      Dioscorea rotundata cv. Imola and cv. AkpajiPre-planting treatment with neem extract, pesticides, and hot water
      (17 weeks)
      Decreased rotting loss
      Decreased weight loss
      Approx. 50% reduced
      Approx. 50% reduced
      [69]
      Dioscorea rotundata cv.
      Poir
      Ambient room temperature
      (30 ± 5 °C, 22 weeks)
      Trichoderma harzianum
      Control on fungal pathogens
      Paired treatments produced 2.22% (T. harzianum × F. oxysporum) and 6.67% (T. harzianum × A. niger) rots[77]
      Dioscorea rotundata cv. abiiMedicinal plants and Apron plus 50DS (16 weeks)Weight loss
      Pathogen infestation
      40% reduction
      0 to 5% reduction
      [79]
      Dioscorea rotundataMedicinal plants extracts
      (28−30 °C, 4 weeks)
      Rotting loss and
      weight loss
      Decreased losses[82]
      Dioscorea sp.Medicinal plants extracts (variable temperature and storage structures)Control of diseases and pestsDecrease in disease and pest incidence[83]
    • Packaging is an important aspect of post-harvest storage and the transportation of produce from field to market. Appropriate packaging helps to minimize the losses during transport and storage. Reports on research on the packaging of yam tubers are not well documented. After harvest and curing, yam tubers can be packed in paper bags, wooden baskets/crates, gunny bags, perforates/non-perforated polyethylene or mesh bags. However, research on packaging with appropriate material along with recommended storage temperature and relative humidity of yam tubers is lacking. The effects of different packaging materials on short- and long-term storage and processing quality of tubers might be evaluated. This in turn will help decide appropriate packaging material and subsequently its effects on postharvest losses.

    • Various storage structures have been suggested for the storage of yams. Yams can be stored in yam barns, platform storage, simple piles or clamps to storage in buildings etc.[72] when provided with proper ventilation. Dioscorea rotundata tubers stored in the open-sided structure showed reduced weight loss, sprouting, decay, pest damage and nutritional composition as compared to heaps on the floor and yam barns structures[12]. Oyewumi et al.[73] reported that yam tubers stored in the barn had the highest rotting loss, sprouting index, and weight loss while the tubers in the platform showed less weight loss compared to the barn after three months of storage.

      The effects of storage structure on post-harvest storage affect the yam tuber quality. Storage in a well-ventilated room (24−28°C and 70%−90% RH) accelerated the sprouting after 60−90 d in D. alata and after 120 d in D. esculenta. In both species the moisture content of stored tubers significantly decreased throughout the storage period, resulting in losses in tuber fresh weight[74]. Ventilation due to airflow has been attributed to the reduction in growth rate and increased physiological damage of stored tubers[75]. Osunde & Orhevba[75] studied the effects of yam barn and barn with a fan to aid air circulation on nutritional and other qualities of Dioscorea roundata cv. 'Giwa'. A barn with a fan showed less physiological damage such as weight loss, rotten tubers etc., and nutritional content as compared to a simple barn after 6 months of storage period. Maalekuu et al.[12] demonstrated that barn, open-sided, and heaps on the floor the open-sided storage structure performed best with respect to weight loss, sprouting, decay, pest damage, and nutritional composition of Dioscorea rotundata (cv. Pona and Tela).

      Ezeike[70] reported that weight loss of stored (under tropical conditions) D. rotundata tubers was affected by air temperature, relative humidity, length of storage, tuber weight, and geometry. Dioscorea rotundata cv. Os hei and Dioscorea dumetorum cv. Jakiri tubers stored under prevailing tropical ambient conditions (18−31 °C, 62%−100% RH) revealed that weight losses were maximum in Jakiri (35%) compared to Oshei (31%) tubers after 110 d of storage. The losses were attributed to the sprouting and dehydration of tubers in both cultivars[71].

    • Rotting of yam tubers and other postharvest diseases affects the quality and results in heavy losses. The application of synthetic chemical fungicides, bio-pesticides, plant growth hormones, and various storage methods was found beneficial in increasing the postharvest storage of yam tubers[76]. The use of synthetic chemicals such as thiobendazole, forcelet, mancozeb, borax etc. controlled the yam tuber rot in storage[77] Chemical fungicides and bio-pesticides had no harmful effects on the nutritional composition of yam tubers and were found to be effective in controlling physiological loss[72,78,79]. Bio-pesticides such as fruit powder of Azadirachta indica and Piper guineense significantly reduced the Dioscorea rotundata cv. abii tuber weight loss and controlled the yam rot as well as nematode infestation after 16 weeks of storage[79] Biocontrol agents such as saprophytic yeast and Trichoderma sp. helped in controlling yam rot[77]. Aidoo[72] reported that an improved pit storage system along with the coating of two chemical fungicides, Shavit F71.5 and Metalaxyl Mancozeb effectively controlled rotting losses in Dioscorea rotundata tubers.

      Various storage conditions and methods have been applied to increase the shelf life of yam tubers. However, additional approaches are required to identify physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms that are associated with post-harvest storage in different yam species and cultivars. Understanding physiological, biochemical, and molecular controls will help predict storage behavior and tuber quality of different yam species under storage.

    • Due to its perishable nature and high moisture content quality of yam tubers are affected due to physiological and biochemical changes during storage. Avery few studies reported biochemical changes that take place during storage of yam tubers. Ravindran & Wanasundera[74] reported that tubers of Dioscorea alata and D. esculenta cultivars showed a significant decrease in crude protein, starch, and vitamin C content after 60 d of storage (thin layers on the floor of a well-ventilated room with 24−28 °C and 70%−90% RH). Storage also reduced minerals and levels of oxalates in tubers of these yam cultivars[74]. Storage (18−31 °C) of Dioscorea rotundata (cv. Oshei) and Dioscorea dumetorum (cv. Jakiri) affected dry matter, sugar, and protein content in both species after four months of storage[71]. Afoakwa et al.[84] studied the effects of storage temperatures (ambient at 28 °C and cold room conditions at 4 °C for 24, 48, and 72 h) on chemical composition, as well as the biochemical and textural changes of two cultivars of Dioscorea dumetorum. The authors observed that the starch levels declined while sugars, fibre content, and textural properties increased under the storage temperatures after 72 h. Four months of storage in an open-air yam barn (27.4 ± 3.8 °C) altered the chemical composition and food quality of Dioscorea rotundata and Dioscorea alata. A total of 216 tubers of yam (Dioscorea Roundata cv. Giwa) stored in the barns for 6 months reduced nutritional parameters such as carbohydrate, calcium, phosphorus, crude fibre, crude fat, crude protein, ash, and moisture contents[75]. A study conducted by DJE et al.[80] demonstrated that total, reducing sugar, and dry matter content increased during 6 months of storage (26.56 ± 3 °C and 82% ± 5% RH) in two varieties of Dioscorea. Total sugar, reducing sugar, and dry matter content increased while minerals such as Zn, Ca, Mg and total phenolic compounds significantly decreased during storage[80]. Dabonne et al.[81] revealed that storage of Dioscorea cayenensis-rotundata (cv. Kangba and Krenglè altered the activities of amylases, cellulases and inulase, phosphatases and pNP-glycosidase enzymes. They observed that activities of amylase and cellulase were increased after 6 months of post-harvest storage (26.56 ± 3 °C and 82% ± 5% RH), whereas α-mannosidases, phospatases decreased in different tuber parts of yams. However, such studies were insufficient to investigate the role of such enzymes in storage of yam tubers. Three varieties of D. rotundata (alaako, Dodoro and Odo) stored under natural light- yam barn, or and darkness conditions significantly affected dry matter, free sugar, and starch content of the three tuber regions at 8 and 16 weeks in storage[85]. Comparative analysis conducted by Moses et al.[86] from D. rotundata, D. alata and D. cayenensis after 4 months of storage at ambient conditions revealed that total sugars increased in these species. Sugars, non-starchy carbohydrates and dry matter increased whereas starch, fat, and protein content decreased compared to freshly harvested yam tubers[20]. Authors also reported that the textural quality of pounded yam made from D. rotundata was more influenced than that from D. alata after storage.

      Biochemical changes in different yam species helped to understand the response of various yam species and cultivars associated with post-harvest storage. Detailed metabolomics approaches might be helpful in identification of key metabolites or metabolic biomarkers that can be utilized by yam breeders for predicating the storage behavior of different yam species/cultivars. Future research should be directed towards understanding the role of important enzymes involved in starch-sugar conversion during storage.

    • Classical breeding approaches have been applied in developing improved yam cultivars. However, the main constraints in yam breeding are heterozygosity, dioecious, and polyploid nature, vegetative mode of propagation, poor seed set, non-synchronous flowering, and long breeding cycles[87,88]. Recent advances in genomics and transcriptomics helped in identifying the regulatory pathways and genes associated with various physiological processes involved in yams. Understating the molecular mechanisms is necessary to decipher the underlying gene network associated with tuber storage physiology and other related processes. Molecular mechanisms and important candidate gene function during yam tuber storage will be helpful in developing storage strategies that can be further utilized in breeding programs.

    • Although starch is the major component in yam tubers, very limited studies on the molecular changes and the expression of genes involved in starch metabolism in yams are reported. Using the transcriptome approach, Siadjeu et al.[89] identified candidate genes involved in post-harvest handling of trifoliate yam (Dioscorea dumetorum). Transcriptome analyses of D. dumetorum tubers at 4 months after emergence, immediately after harvest, 3 d after harvest, and 14 d after harvest revealed genes encoding for CELLULOSE SYNTHASE A, XYLAN O-ACETYLTRANSFERASE, CHLOROPHYLL A/B BINDING PROTEINS, and an MYB transcription factor. Their studies confirmed that these genes were potentially involved in the post-harvest handling of yam tubers. In another study, Dioscorea polystachya subjected to transcriptome analysis during tuber development stages identified candidate genes involved in starch and sucrose metabolism, plant hormone signal transduction pathway, and flavonoid pathway[90]. Expression of granule-bound starch synthase, starch branching enzymes, α-amylase, β-amylase etc. revealed their significance in Dioscorea polystachya tubers starch metabolism. Likewise, the expression and correlation of sucrose synthase genes with sucrose metabolism revealed sucrose metabolism during the rapid growth of these tubers. Although this study identified important candidate genes involved in starch and sucrose as well as other metabolic processes associated with the molecular mechanism of tuber development[90] their functional significance remains to be elucidated.

      Starch and sucrose metabolism are important processes in yam tubers. Hence, a detailed analysis of different yam species using various storage conditions may help in elucidating the role of starch and sucrose metabolism genes and respective enzymes in post-harvest storage and dormancy of yam tubers. Different yam species can be explored for allelic diversity and gene expression patterns of genes involved in starch and sucrose metabolism. Further research, perhaps using transgenic technologies is required to understand gene function at the species level.

    • Color is an important criterion that determines consumer acceptance as well as its marketability. Dioscorea species not only vary in shape and other morphological characteristics but also differ in their flesh and skin color. Based on flesh color the species can be classified as white yam, yellow yam, and purple yam[91, 92]. Through transcriptome analysis, the elite purple-flesh tubers and the conventional white-flesh tubers of D. alata identified a total of 511 differentially expressed genes in two yam cultivars[93]. Authors reported that the expression of genes encoding chalcone isomerase, flavanone 3-hydroxylase, flavonoid 3′-monooxygenase, dihydroflavonol 4-reductase, leucoanthocyanidin dioxygenase, and flavonol 3-O-glucosyltransferase were found to be significantly up-regulated in the purple flesh tuber. Such studies provided valuable information of key genes that might be directly used to genetically manipulate the conventional, white-flesh tuber cultivars to enable them to produce purple flesh[93]. In another study, authors identified candidate genes related to flavonoid biosynthesis from mature tubers of Dioscorea cirrhosa which have a unique red color[94]. These red color tubers are rich in polyphenols, such as epicatechin, and catechins. Transcriptome profiling performed from four stages of color tubers identified 67 candidate genes related to the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway and three genes that played pivotal roles in proanthocyanin synthesis[94]. The expression of 13 enzymes (phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, cinnamate 4-hydroxylase, 4-coumarate-CoAligase, leucoanthocyanidin reductase etc.) directly involved in flavonoid biosynthesis was consistent with the changes in flavonoid metabolites such as luteolin-3-O-glucoside, luteolin-4-O-glucoside, aromadendrin-7-O-rutinoside, hesperetin-7-O-glucoside, and Tamarixetin[94].

      Flavonoids are an important class of secondary metabolites. Considering its health benefits, it is therefore necessary to understand the flavonoid diversity in different yam species. For this, the knowledge of genetic diversity of various flavonoids and their respective genes is necessary. Such information can be further utilized by breeders to develop yam cultivars with desired storage and processing characteristics.

      Syombua et al.[95] reviewed the potential applications of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats/CRISPR-associated protein (CRISPR/Cas) system for yam improvement. Advances in genome editing tools such as CRISPR/Cas system will be helpful in developing yam cultivars with improved nutritional and medicinal properties. The authors mentioned that improvement of the yam germplasm through modern biotechnological tools such as genetic transformation and genome editing may allow direct manipulation of the genome. With the help of CRISPR/Cas system, genome manipulations can be conducted by designing strategies for yam disease and pest resistance, dormancy and storage-related traits, as well as the nutritional quality of yam tubers.

    • Due to their high nutritional and medicinal values, yams are considered as an alternative food source especially in developing countries. Both storage and dormancy are important physiological traits in yam tuber production. Storage and dormancy are influenced by yam species, agronomic conditions, storage type and duration, and biotic and abiotic factors. Therefore, understanding biochemical and molecular mechanisms underlying these processes is essential. Identifying important biochemical pathways, key candidate metabolites, and genes involved in regulating postharvest storage and dormancy will be helpful in determining and predicting storage as well as dormancy behavior of different yam species. Research can further be directed towards identifying starch to sugar conversion processes, related enzymes and key genes involved during post-harvest storage of different yam species and cultivars. Such candidates can be used as biomarkers which can be utilized in yam breeding programs. Manipulation of important genes using Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/Cas9 (CRISPR/Cas9) will be helpful in elucidating the role of important genes involved in the regulation of yam tuber storage as well as dormancy. Incorporating the molecular techniques in yam breeding programs may enhance the post-harvest storage life without compromising their nutritional and processing quality.

    • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Datir S; data collection: Datir S, Kumbhar R; analysis and interpretation of results: Datir S, Kumatkar P; draft manuscript preparation: Datir S. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    • Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

      • The authors are grateful to Smita Godrej Crisha, Director, and Dr. Kranti Yardi, Head, Naoroji Godrej Centre for Plant Research, Shirwal for providing guidance, support, and infrastructure facilities. This research was supported by Naoroji Godrej Centre for Plant Research grant to SD under Wild Edible Plants Research Project.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2024 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (1)  Table (3) References (95)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Datir S, Kumbhar R, Kumatkar P. 2024. Understanding physiological and biochemical mechanisms associated with post-harvest storage of Yam tuber (Dioscorea sp.). Technology in Horticulture 4: e004 doi: 10.48130/tihort-0024-0001
    Datir S, Kumbhar R, Kumatkar P. 2024. Understanding physiological and biochemical mechanisms associated with post-harvest storage of Yam tuber (Dioscorea sp.). Technology in Horticulture 4: e004 doi: 10.48130/tihort-0024-0001

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return