Search
  • All Journals
Advanced Search
Search articles by Title, Author, Keywords, DOI
3.9CiteScore
1.3Impact Factor
Advanced Search
MAP  >  The Knowledge Engineering Review
2007 Volume 22
Article Contents
Next Previous
RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

On agent technology for e-commerce: trust, security and legal issues

More Information
  • Abstract: The vision of future electronic marketplaces (e-markets) is that of markets being populated by autonomous intelligent entities—software, trading, e-agents—representing their users or owners and conducting business on their behalf. For this vision to materialize, one fundamental issue that needs to be addressed is that of trust. First, users need to be able to trust that the agents will do what they say they do. Second, they need to be confident that their privacy is protected and that the security risks involved in entrusting agents to perform transactions on their behalf are minimized. Finally, users need to be assured that any legal issues relating to agents trading electronically are fully covered as they are in traditional trading practices. In this paper we consider the barriers for the adoption of agent technology in electronic commerce (e-commerce) which pertain to trust, security and legal issues. We discuss the perceived risks of the use of agents in e-commerce and the fundamental issue of trust in this context. Issues regarding security, and how some of these can be addressed through the use of cryptography, are described. The impact of the use of agent technology on the users' privacy and how it can be both protected as well as hindered by it is also examined. Finally, we discuss the legal issues that arise in agent-mediated e-commerce and discuss the idea of attributing to software agents the status of legal persons or e-persons and the various implications.
  • 加载中
  • Andrade F., Novais P. & Neves J.2004 Issues on intelligent electronic agents and legal relations. In Proceedings of the Law of Electronic Agents Workshop (LEA-04), Rome, Italy, June 30, pp. 81–94.

    Google Scholar

    Apistola M., Brazier F., Kubbe O., Oskamp A., Schellekens M. & Voulon M.2002 Legal aspects of agent technology. In Proceedings of the 17th BILETA Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, April 5–6.

    Google Scholar

    Arunachalam R. & Sadeh N.2004 The 2003 supply chain management trading agent competition. In Proceedings of the Trading Agent Design and Analysis Workshop (TADA), Acapulco, Mexico, August 11.

    Google Scholar

    Axelrod R.1984The Evolution of Cooperation. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar

    Baker S. A. & Hurst P. R.1998The Limits of Trust. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.

    Google Scholar

    Bickmore T. W. & Cassell J.2001 Relational agents: a model and implementation of building user trust. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI, Seattle, WA, March 31–April 5, New York, NY: ACM Press, pp. 396–403.

    Google Scholar

    Brazier F. M. T., Oskamp A., Prins C., Schellekens M. H. M. & Wijngaards N. J. E.2004a Anonymity and software agents: an interdisciplinary challenge. Artificial Intelligence and Law12(1–2), 137–157.

    Google Scholar

    Brazier F. M. T., Oskamp A., Schellekens M. H. M. & Wijngaards N. J. E.2003 Can agents close contracts? In Oskamp A. & Weitzenboeck E. (eds.), Proceedings of the Law of Electronic Agents Workshop (LEA-03), Edinburgh, UK, June 24, pp. 9–20.

    Google Scholar

    Brazier F. M. T., Oskamp A., Prins J. E. J., Schellekens M. H. M. & Wijngaards N. J. E.2004b Law-abiding and integrity on the Internet: a case for agents. Artificial Intelligence and Law12(1–2), 5–37.

    Google Scholar

    Bromley D. B.1993Reputation, Image and Impression Management. Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar

    Bygrave L. A.2001Electronic agents and privacy: a Cyberspace Odyssey 2001. International Journal of Law and Information Technology9(3), 275–294.

    Google Scholar

    Chaum D.1982 Blind signatures for untraceable payments. In Chaum D., Rivest R. L. & Sherman A. T. (eds.), Advances in Cryptology: Proceedings of CRYPTO’82 Conference, Santa Barbara, CA, August, New York: Plenum, pp. 199–203.

    Google Scholar

    Child M. & Linketscher N.2001 Trust issues and user reactions to e-services and electronic marketplaces: a customer survey. Technical Report HPL-2001-32, Hewlett Packard, Trusted E-Services Laboratory, HP Laboratories, Bristol.

    Google Scholar

    Claessens J., Preneel B. & Vandewalle J.2003(How) can mobile agents do secure electronic transactions on untrusted hosts? A survey of the security issues and the current solutions. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology3(1), 28–48.

    Google Scholar

    Dash R. K., Jennings N. R. & Parkes D. C.2003Computational-mechanism design: a call to arms. IEEE Intelligent Systems18(6), 40–47.

    Google Scholar

    Dellarocas C.2000a Immunizing online reputation reporting systems against unfair ratings and discriminatory behavior. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM conference on Electronic commerce (EC-00), Minneapolis, MN, October 17–20, New York, NY: ACM Press, pp. 150–157.

    Google Scholar

    Dellarocas C.2000b Mechanisms for coping with unfair ratings and discriminatory behavior in online reputation reporting systems. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS-00), Brisbane, Australia, December 10–13. Atlanta, GA: Association for Information Systems Press, pp. 520–525.

    Google Scholar

    Dellarocas C. & Klein M.1999 Civil agent societies: tools for inventing open agent-mediated electronic marketplaces. In Moukas A., Sierra C. & Ygge F. (eds.), Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce II, Towards Next-Generation Agent-Based Electronic Commerce Systems, IJCAI 1999 Workshop (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1788), Stockholm, Sweden, July 31. Berlin: Springer, pp. 24–39.

    Google Scholar

    Diffie W. & Hellman M.1976 Multiuser cryptographic techniques. In Proceedings of the AFIPS National Computer Conference, New York, June. Montvale, NJ: AFIPS Press, pp. 109–112.

    Google Scholar

    Dignum F.2001 Agents, markets, institutions, and protocols. In Dignum F. & Sierra C. (eds.), Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce, The European AgentLink Perspective (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1991). Berlin: Springer, pp. 98–114.

    Google Scholar

    Dignum F.2002 Abstract norms and electronic institutions. In Lindemann G., Moldt D., Paolucci M. & Yu B. (eds.), Proceedings of the Regulated Agent-based Social Systems: Theory and Applications Workshop (RASTA’02), Bologna, Italy, July 16, pp. 93–103.

    Google Scholar

    Doorenbos R. B., Etzioni O. & Weld D. S.1997 A scalable comparison-shopping agent for the World Wide Web. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents 97), Marina del Rey, CA, February 5–8, New York, NY: ACM Press, pp. 39–48.

    Google Scholar

    Esteva M., Rodríguez-Aguilar J. A., Sierra C., Garcia P. & Arcos J. L.2001 On the formal specification of electronic institutions. In Dignum F. & Sierra C. (eds.), Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce, The European AgentLink Perspective (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1991). Berlin: Springer, pp. 126–147.

    Google Scholar

    Falcone R. &Castelfranchi C.2004 Trust dynamics: How trust is influenced by direct experiences and by trust itself. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-04), New York, NY, July 23–25, IEEE Computer Society, pp. 740–747.

    Google Scholar

    Fasli M.2006 Shopbots: A syntactic present, a semantic future. IEEE Internet Computing10(6), 69–75.

    Google Scholar

    Froomkin A. M.1995 Anonymity and its enmities. Journal of Online Law Art. 4. Available at http://www.wm.edu/law/publications/jol/95_96/froomkin.html

    Google Scholar

    Froomkin A. M.1996Flood control on the information ocean: living with anonymity, digital cash, and distributed databases. Journal of Law and Commerce15, 395–479.

    Google Scholar

    Geurts R.2002 Legal aspects of software agents. In Prins J. E. J., Ribbers P. M. A., van Tilborg H. C. A., Veth A. F. L. & van der Wees J. G. L. (eds.), Trust in Electronic Commerce: The Role of Trust from a Legal, an Organizational and a Technical Point of View. The Hague: Kluwer, pp. 231–270.

    Google Scholar

    Guttman A. G., Moukas R. H. & Maes P.1999 Agent-mediated integrative negotiation for retail electronic commerce. In Noriega P. & Sierra C. (eds.), Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce, 1st International Workshop on Agent Mediated Electronic Trading (AMET’98), Selected Papers (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 1571). Berlin: Springer, pp. 70–90.

    Google Scholar

    He M., Jennings N. R. & Leung H.-F.2003On agent-mediated electronic commerce. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering15(4), 985–1003.

    Google Scholar

    Jansen W. & Karygiannis T.1999 Mobile agent security. Technical Report NIST Special Publication 800-19, National Institute of Standards and Technology. Available at csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/.

    Google Scholar

    Jenks J. M. & Kelly J. M.1985Don't Do, Delegate!New York: Franklin Watts.

    Google Scholar

    Kollock P.1999 The production of trust in online markets. In Lawler E. J., Macy M., Thyne S. & Walker H. A. (eds.), Advances in Group Processes, vol. 16. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar

    Krulwich B. T.1996 The BargainFinder agent: comparing price shopping on the Internet. In Williams J. (ed.) Bots and Other Internet Beasties, SAMS.NET. London: Macmillan, pp. 258–263.

    Google Scholar

    Lee J. & Moray N.1992Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human–machine systems. Ergonomics35(10), 1243–1270.

    Google Scholar

    Linden G., Smith B. & York J.2003Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering. IEEE Internet Computing7(1), 76–80.

    Google Scholar

    Luhmann N.1979Trust and Power: Two Works. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar

    Luhmann N.1990 Familiarity, confidence, trust: problems and alternatives. In Gambetta D. (ed.), Trust: Making and Breaking Cooperative Relations. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 94–109.

    Google Scholar

    Maes P., Guttman R. & Moukas A.1999Agents that buy and sell: transforming commerce as we know it. Communications of the ACM42(3), 81–91.

    Google Scholar

    Marsh S.1994 Formalising trust as a computational concept. PhD thesis, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Stirling, UK.

    Google Scholar

    Martin D.1998 Internet anonymizing techniques. login:Magazine. Available at www.usenix.org/publications/login/1998-5/martin.html.

    Google Scholar

    McAfee R. P. & McMillan J.1987Auctions and bidding. Journal of Economic Literature25(2), 699–738.

    Google Scholar

    Menczer F., Street W. N.,Vishwakarma N., Monge A. E. & Jakobsson M.2002 IntelliShopper: a proactive, personal, private shopping assistant. In Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-02), Bologna, Italy, July 15–19, New York, NY: ACM Press, pp. 1001–1008.

    Google Scholar

    Michalakopoulos M. & Fasli M.2005 On deciding to trust. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Trust Management (iTrust) (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 3477). Berlin: Springer, pp. 61–76.

    Google Scholar

    Montaner M., Lopez B. & Dela J.2003A taxonomy of recommender agents on the Internet. Artificial Intelligence Review19(4), 285–330.

    Google Scholar

    Muir B. M.1987Trust between humans and machines and the design of decision aids. International Journal of Man–Machine Studies46, 485–500.

    Google Scholar

    Norman D. A.1990 The “problem” of automation: inappropriate feedback and interaction, not “over-automation”. In Broadbent D. E., Baddeley A. & Reason J. T. (eds.), Human Factors in Hazardous Situations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 585–593.

    Google Scholar

    North D. C.1990Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar

    Oates D.1993Leadership: The Art of Delegation. London: Century Business.

    Google Scholar

    Patrick A. S.2002Building trustworthy agents. IEEE Internet Computing6(6), 46–53.

    Google Scholar

    Pine B. J.1999Mass Customisation. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar

    Reagle J. M.Jr.1996 Trust in electronic markets: the convergence of cryptographers and economists. First Monday. Available at: www.firstmonday.dk/issues/issue2/markets/.

    Google Scholar

    Resnick P., Kuwabara K., Zeckhauser R. & Friedman E.2000. Reputation systems. Communications of the ACM43(12), 45–48.

    Google Scholar

    Resnick P. & Varian H. R.1997Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM40(3), 56–58.

    Google Scholar

    Rhee M. Y.2003Internet Security: Cryptographic Principles, Algorithms and Protocols. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar

    Riegelsberger J. & Sasse A. M.2001 Trustbuilders and trustbusters: the role of trust in interfaces to e-commerce applications. In Towards The E-Society: E-Commerce, E-Business, and E-Government, Proceedings of the 1st IFIP Conference on E-Commerce, E-Business, E-Government (I3E 2001), Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 17–30.

    Google Scholar

    Rotter J. B.1980Interpersonal trust, trustworthiness and gullibility. American Psychologist35(1), 1–7.

    Google Scholar

    Sartor G.2002 Agents in Cyberlaw. In Sartor G. & Cevenini C. (eds.), Proceedings of theWorkshop on the Law of Electronic Agents (LEA 2002), Bologna, Italy, July 13.

    Google Scholar

    Schneider J., Kortuem G., Jager J., Fickas S. & Segall S.2000Disseminating trust information in wearable communities. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing4(4), 245–248.

    Google Scholar

    Senicar V., Jerman-Blazic B. & Klobucar T.2003Privacy-enhancing technologies: approaches and development. Computer Standards and Interfaces25(2), 147–158.

    Google Scholar

    Shapiro S. P.1987The social control of impersonal trust. American Journal of Sociology93(3), 623–658.

    Google Scholar

    Sierra C. & Noriega P.2002 Agent-mediated interaction: From auctions to negotiation and argumentation. In d'Inverno W., Luck M., Fisher M. & Priest C. (eds.), Foundations and Applications of Multi-agent Systems: UKMAS Workshops 1996–2000, Selected Papers (Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 2403).Berlin: Springer, pp. 27–48.

    Google Scholar

    Stallings W.2003Network Security Essentials: Applications and Standards. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar

    Tschudin C. F.1999 Mobile agent security. In Klusch M. (ed.), Intelligent Information Agents: Agent-Based Information Discovery and Management on the Internet. Berlin: Springer, ch. 18, pp. 431–446.

    Google Scholar

    Ulfelder S. June 2000 Undercover Agents. Computer World. Available at www.computerworld.com/news/2000/story/0,11280,45452,00.html.

    Google Scholar

    Vázquez-Salceda J., Padget J., Cortés U., López-Navidad A. & Caballero F.2003Formalizing an electronic institution for the distribution of human tissues. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine27(3), 233–258.

    Google Scholar

    Vulkan N.2003The Economics of E-commerce. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar

    Weitzenbock E. M.2001Electronic agents and the formation of contracts. International Journal of Law and Information Technology9(3), 204–234.

    Google Scholar

    Weitzenbock E. M.2002 Electronic agents and contract performance: good faith and fair dealing. In Proceedings of the Law of Electronic Agents Workshop (LEA-02): Selected Revised Papers, Bologna, Italy, July 13, pp. 67–73.

    Google Scholar

    Wellman M. P., Greenwald A. R., Stone P. & Wurman P. R.2003The 2001 Trading Agent Competition. Electronic Markets13(1).

    Google Scholar

    Wettig S. & Zehender E.2004A legal analysis of human and electronic agents. Artificial Intelligence and Law12(1–2), 111–135.

    Google Scholar

    Wooldridge M. & Jennings N. R.1995Intelligent agents: theory and practice. Knowledge Engineering Review10(2), 115–152.

    Google Scholar

    Youll J.2001 Agent-based electronic commerce: opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Autonomous Decentralized Systems (ISADS), Dallas, TX, pp. 146–148.

    Google Scholar

    Yu B. & Singh M. P.2002 An evidential model of distributed reputation management. In Proceedings of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS’02), Bologna, Italy, July 15–19, New York, NY: ACM Press, pp. 294–301.

    Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    MARIA FASLI. 2007. On agent technology for e-commerce: trust, security and legal issues. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 22:14 doi: 10.1017/S0269888907001014
    MARIA FASLI. 2007. On agent technology for e-commerce: trust, security and legal issues. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 22:14 doi: 10.1017/S0269888907001014
    shu
Download PDF

Article Metrics

Article views(32) PDF downloads(419)

Other Articles By Authors

RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

On agent technology for e-commerce: trust, security and legal issues

  • Published online: 01 March 2007
The Knowledge Engineering Review  22,  Article number: 10.1017/S0269888907001014  (2007)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Abstract: The vision of future electronic marketplaces (e-markets) is that of markets being populated by autonomous intelligent entities—software, trading, e-agents—representing their users or owners and conducting business on their behalf. For this vision to materialize, one fundamental issue that needs to be addressed is that of trust. First, users need to be able to trust that the agents will do what they say they do. Second, they need to be confident that their privacy is protected and that the security risks involved in entrusting agents to perform transactions on their behalf are minimized. Finally, users need to be assured that any legal issues relating to agents trading electronically are fully covered as they are in traditional trading practices. In this paper we consider the barriers for the adoption of agent technology in electronic commerce (e-commerce) which pertain to trust, security and legal issues. We discuss the perceived risks of the use of agents in e-commerce and the fundamental issue of trust in this context. Issues regarding security, and how some of these can be addressed through the use of cryptography, are described. The impact of the use of agent technology on the users' privacy and how it can be both protected as well as hindered by it is also examined. Finally, we discuss the legal issues that arise in agent-mediated e-commerce and discuss the idea of attributing to software agents the status of legal persons or e-persons and the various implications.

    HTML

    Rights and permissions
    • Copyright © Cambridge University Press 20072007Cambridge University Press
References (74)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    MARIA FASLI. 2007. On agent technology for e-commerce: trust, security and legal issues. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 22:14 doi: 10.1017/S0269888907001014
    MARIA FASLI. 2007. On agent technology for e-commerce: trust, security and legal issues. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 22:14 doi: 10.1017/S0269888907001014
    shu

    • Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return