Search
2007 Volume 22
Article Contents
RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

Text-based domain ontology building using Tf-Idf and metric clusters techniques

More Information
  • Abstract: The paper describes the methodology used to develop a construction domain ontology, taking into account the wealth of existing semantic resources in the sector ranging from dictionaries to thesauri. Given the characteristics and settings of the construction industry, a modular, architecture-centric approach was adopted to structure and develop the ontology. The paper argues that taxonomies provide an ideal backbone for any ontology project. Therefore, a construction industry standard taxonomy was used to provide the seeds of the ontology, enriched and expanded with additional concepts extracted from large discipline-oriented document bases using information retrieval (IR) techniques.
  • 加载中
  • Aussenac-Gilles N., Biébow B. and Szulman S.2001 Revisiting ontology design: a methodology based on corpus analysis. In 12th International Conference in Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, (EKAW’00), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1937. Berlin: Springer, pp. 396–408.

    Google Scholar

    Baeza-Yates R. and Ribeiro-Neto B.1999Modern Information Retrieval. New York, NY, USA: Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar

    Bechhofer S., Horrocks I., Goble C. and Stevens R.2001 OilEd: a reason-able ontology editor for the Semantic Web. In Joint German/Austrian conference on Artificial Intelligence (KI01), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2174. Berlin: Springer, pp. 396–408.

    Google Scholar

    Bernaras A., Laresgoiti I. and Corera J.1996 Building and reusing ontologies for electrical network applications. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 96), Budapest, Hungary:von Neumann Society of Computer Science, pp. 298–302.

    Google Scholar

    Blazquez M., Fernandez M., Garcia-Pinar J. M. and Gomez-Perez A.1998 Building ontologies at the knowledge level using the ontology design environment. In Gaines B. R. and Musen M. A. (eds.), Proceedings of the Knowledge Acquisition Workshop (KAW98), Banff, Alberta, Canada, 18–23 April 1998. Available at www.ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/KAW/KAW98/KAW98Proc.html;www.ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/KAW/KAW98/blazquez/

    Google Scholar

    Broglio J., Callan J. P., Croft W. B. and Nachbar D. W.1995 Document retrieval and routing using the INQUERY system. In Harman D. K. (ed.), Overview of the Third Retrieval Conference (TREC-3). Gaithersburg, USA: NIST Special Publication 500–225, pp. 29–38.

    Google Scholar

    BS61001992 Glossary of building and civil engineering terms, British Standards Institution. www.bsonline.techindex.co.uk

    Google Scholar

    Cimiano P. and Volker J.2005 Text2Onto: a framework for ontology learning and data-driven change discovery. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on applications of natural language to data bases, (NLDB’05), Alicante(Spain), LNCS 3513, Springer, pp. 227–238.

    Google Scholar

    CoMMA Consortium2002 Corporate memory management through agents. In Cunningham P. and Cunningham M. (eds.) Proceedings of E-Work & E-Business 2002, Madrid: IOS Press, pp. 383–406.

    Google Scholar

    Corcho O., Fernando-Lopez M. and Gomez-Perez A.2003Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies. Where is their meeting point?Data and Knowledge Engineering, 46, 41–64.

    Google Scholar

    Cristani M. and Cuel R.2005A survey on ontology creation methodologies. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems1(2), 49–69.

    Google Scholar

    eCognos Consortium2002eCognos Ontology, Project Deliverable D3.6, France: CSTB.

    Google Scholar

    eCognos Consortium2003eCognos Field Trials, Project Deliverable D4.2, France: Derbi.

    Google Scholar

    eConstruct2001 Final edition of the bcXML Specifications. Available at www.econstruct.org/6-public/bcxml_cd/publicdeliverables/d103_v2.pdf

    Google Scholar

    Euzenat J.1996 Corporative memory through cooperative creation of knowledge bases and hyper-documents. In Proceedings of the 10th Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop (KAW96), pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar

    Euzenat J.2004 An API for ontology alignment. In Hiroshima J. P., van Harmelen F., McIlraith S. and Plexousakis D. (eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd conference on international semantic web conference (ISWC), 2004, vol. 3298, Heidelberg (DE): Springer Verlag, pp. 698–712.

    Google Scholar

    Farquhar A., Fikes R. and Rice J.1996 The ontolingua server: a tool for collaborative ontology construction. In Proceedings of the 10th Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-Based Systems Workshop (KAW96) Ban, pp. 44.1–44.19. Avaliable at www.ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/KAW/KAW96/KAW96Proc.html;www.ksi.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/KAW/KAW96/farquhar/farquhar.html

    Google Scholar

    Fernandez-Lopez M., Gomez-Perez A., Pazos-Sierra A. and Pazos-Sierra J.1999Building a chemical ontology using METHONTOLOGY and the ontology design environment. IEEE Intelligent Systems & their applications4(1), 37–46.

    Google Scholar

    Ganter B. and Stumme G.2003 Creation and merging of ontology top-levels. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Conceptual Structures (ICCS'03), LNCS 2746. Dresden, Germany, July 21–25, 2003. Springer, pp. 131–145.

    Google Scholar

    Gomez-Perez A.2001Evaluation of ontologies. International Journal of Intelligent Systems16(3), 10:1–10:36.

    Google Scholar

    Gruber T.1994Towards principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human Computer Studies43(5/6), 907–928.

    Google Scholar

    Grüninger M. and Fox M. S.1995 Methodology for the design and evaluation of ontologies. In Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge SharingAugust 19–20 Montreal: AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar

    Guarino N., Masolo N. and Vetere G.1999OntoSeek: contentbased access to the web. IEEE Intelligent Systems14(3), 70–80.

    Google Scholar

    Guarino N. and Welty C.2000 Supporting ontological analysis of taxonomic relationships. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER'00), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1920. Berlin: Springer, pp. 210–224.

    Google Scholar

    Haava H. M.2004 Semi-automatic method to ontology design by using FCA. In Proceedings of the CLA 2004 International Workshop on Concept Lattices and their Applications, Ostrava, Czech Republic, September 23–24 (CEUR Workshop Proceedings), Vol. 110. Available at www.CEUR-WS.org

    Google Scholar

    Hahn U. and Schulz S.2003Towards a broad-coverage biomedical ontology based on description logics. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing8, 577–588.

    Google Scholar

    Holsapple C. W. and Joshi K. D.2002A collaborative approach to ontology designCommunications of the ACM45(2), 42–47.

    Google Scholar

    Horrocks I. and van Harmelen F.2001 Reference description of the DAML-OIL (March 2001) ontology markup language, Technical Report. Available from www.daml.org/2001/03/reference.html

    Google Scholar

    IAI2006 International alliance for interoperability. IAI Web Site. Available at www.iai-international.org, accessed July 15, 2006.

    Google Scholar

    ISO 12006-22001 Building construction: organization of information about construction works (Part 2: framework for classification of information). International Standards Organisation.

    Google Scholar

    Kalfoglou Y. and Robertson D.1999 Use of formal ontologies to support error checking in specifications. In Fensel D. and Studer R. (eds.), Proceedings of the 11th European Workshop on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management (EKAW’99), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1621. Berlin: Springer, pp. 207–224.

    Google Scholar

    Kalyanpur A., Parsia B., Sirin E. and Hendler J.2005Debugging unsatisfiable classes in OWL ontologies. Journal of Web Semantics3(4), 268–293.

    Google Scholar

    Kayed A. and Colomb R. M.2002Extracting ontological concepts for tendering conceptual structures. Data and Knowledge Engineering40, 71–89.

    Google Scholar

    Kietz J. U., Maedche A. and Volz R.2000 A method for semi-automatic ontology acquisition from a corporate intranet. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW’00), Workshop on Ontologies and Texts, CEUR Proceedings, Juan-Les-Pins, 51, 4.14.14.

    Google Scholar

    Klein M.2001 Combining and relating ontologies: an analysis of problems and solutions. In Gomez-Perez A., Gruninger M., Stuckenschmidt H. and Uschold M. (eds.), Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing, International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI’01), Seattle, USA, 4–5 August.

    Google Scholar

    Klein M., Fensel D., Kiryakov A. and Ognyanov D.2002 Ontology versioning and change detection on the Web. In Gomez-Perez A. and Benjamins V. R. (eds.), Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW02), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2473. Berlin: Springer, pp. 247–259.

    Google Scholar

    Lenat D. B. and Guha R. V.1990Building large knowledge-based systems: representation and inference in the Cyc project.Boston: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar

    Lopez M. F.1999 Overview of methodologies for building ontologies. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-99), workshop on ontologies and problem-solving methods, Stockholm, August 2, 1999.

    Google Scholar

    Lowe E. J.1995 Ontology. In Honderich, T. (ed.), The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Available at www.xrefer.com/entry.jsp?xrefid=553052

    Google Scholar

    McGuiness D. L., Fikes R., Rice J. and Wilder S.2000 An environment for merging and testing large ontologies. In Seventh International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning 5KR 2000, Breckenridge, Colorado, USA, San Francisco, California: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, pp. 12–15.

    Google Scholar

    Neches R., Fikes R. E., Finin T., Gruber T. R., Senator T. and Swartout W. R.1991Enabling Technology for Knowledge Sharing. AI Magazine12(3), 36–56.

    Google Scholar

    Noy N. F. and Klein M.2002Ontology evolution: not the same as schema evolution, Technical Report SMI-2002-0926, Stanford.

    Google Scholar

    Noy N. F. and Musen M. A.2000 PROMPT: Algorithm and tool for automated ontology merging and alignment. In Proceedings of the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’00), Austin: AAAI Press.

    Google Scholar

    Noy N. F., Sintek M., Decker S., Crubézy M., Fergerson R. W. and Musen M. A.2001Creating semantic web contents with Protégé-2000. IEEE Intelligent Systems16(2), 60–71.

    Google Scholar

    Omelayenko B.2001 Syntactic-level ontology integration rules for e-commerce. In Proceedings of the 14th FLAIRS Conference (FLAIRS-2001), Key West, Florida, May 21–23, 2001. Menlo Park, California: AAAI press.

    Google Scholar

    Partridge C.2002 The role of ontology in integrating semantically heterogeneous databases, Technical Report 05/02, LADSEB-CNR, Padova, Italy, June 2002. www.loa-cnr.it/Papers/ladseb_tr05-02.pdf

    Google Scholar

    Pinto H. S. and Martins J. P.2000 Reusing ontologies. In Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2000) Spring Symposium Series, Workshop on Bringing Knowledge to Business Processes, SS-00-03. Menlo Park, California: AAAI Press, pp. 77–84.

    Google Scholar

    Rezgui Y.2001Review of information and knowledge management practices state of the art in the construction industry. Knowledge Engineering Review16(3), 241–254.

    Google Scholar

    Rezgui Y.2006Ontology-centered knowledge management using information retrieval techniques. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering20(4), 261–270.

    Google Scholar

    Rezgui Y. and Zarli A.2006paving the way to the vision of digital construction: a strategic roadmap. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management132(7), 767–776.

    Google Scholar

    Rezgui Y.2007a Exploring virtual team-working effectiveness in the construction sector. Interacting with Computers19(1), 96–112.

    Google Scholar

    Rezgui Y.2007b Knowledge systems and value creation: an action research investigation. Industrial Management and Data Systems (Emerald)107(2), 166–182.

    Google Scholar

    Salton G. and Buckley C.1988Term weighting approaches in automatic retrieval. Information Processing and Management24(5), 513–523.

    Google Scholar

    Staab S., Schnurr H. P., Studer R. and Sure Y.2001. Knowledge processes and ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems16(1), 26–34.

    Google Scholar

    STEP1994. Overview: STEP (ISO 10303) Product Data Representation and Exchange initiative, TC 184/SC4, www.tc184-sc4.org/SC4_Open/SC4_Work_Products_Documents/STEP_(10303)/, last accessed 05/04/2005.

    Google Scholar

    Stojanovic L. and Motik B.2002 Ontology evolution with ontology. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (EKAW02) Workshop on Evaluation of Ontology based Tools (EON2002), CEUR Workshop Proceedings, Siguenza, vol. 62, pp. 53–62.

    Google Scholar

    Studer R., Benjamins V. and Fensel D.1998Knowledge engineering: principles and methods. IEEE Transactions on Data and Knowledge Engineering25, 161–197.

    Google Scholar

    Stumme G. and Maedche A.2001 Ontology merging for federated ontologies on the semantic web. In: Gomez-Perez A., Gruninger M., Stuckenschmidt H. and Uschold M. (eds.), Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing, International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence(IJCAI’01), Seattle, USA, 4–5 August 2001.

    Google Scholar

    Sugumaran V. and Storey V. C.2002Ontologies for conceptual modeling: their creation, use and management. Data and Knowledge Engineering42, 251–271.

    Google Scholar

    Sure Y., Erdmann M., Angele J., Staab S., Studer R. and Wenke D.2002 OntoEdit: collaborative ontology engineering for the semantic web. In Proceedings of the First International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC’02), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 2342. Berlin, Springer, pp. 221–235.

    Google Scholar

    Swartout A. T.1999. Ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications14(1), 18–19.

    Google Scholar

    Swartout B., Ramesh P., Knight K. and Russ T.1997Toward distributed use of large-scale ontologies, aaai symposium on ontological engineering, Stanford, 1997.

    Google Scholar

    Tomovic A., Janicic P. and Keselj V.2006n-Gram-based classification and unsupervised hierarchical clustering of genome sequences. Computer Methods And Programs In Biomedicine81, 137–153.

    Google Scholar

    Uschold M. and King M.1995 Towards a Methodology for Building Ontologies. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI95), Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing, Montreal, 1995.

    Google Scholar

    Welty C. and Guarino N.2001Supporting ontological analysis of taxonomic relationships. Data and Knowledge Engineering39(1), 51–74.

    Google Scholar

    Wetherill M.Rezgui Y.Lima C. and Zarli A.2002Knowledge management for the construction industry: the e-cognos project. Journal of Information Technology in Construction7, 183–196, www.itcon.org/2002/12

    Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    YACINE REZGUI. 2007. Text-based domain ontology building using Tf-Idf and metric clusters techniques. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 22: doi: 10.1017/S0269888907001130
    YACINE REZGUI. 2007. Text-based domain ontology building using Tf-Idf and metric clusters techniques. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 22: doi: 10.1017/S0269888907001130

Article Metrics

Article views(29) PDF downloads(117)

Other Articles By Authors

RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

Text-based domain ontology building using Tf-Idf and metric clusters techniques

The Knowledge Engineering Review  22 Article number: 10.1017/S0269888907001130  (2007)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Abstract: The paper describes the methodology used to develop a construction domain ontology, taking into account the wealth of existing semantic resources in the sector ranging from dictionaries to thesauri. Given the characteristics and settings of the construction industry, a modular, architecture-centric approach was adopted to structure and develop the ontology. The paper argues that taxonomies provide an ideal backbone for any ontology project. Therefore, a construction industry standard taxonomy was used to provide the seeds of the ontology, enriched and expanded with additional concepts extracted from large discipline-oriented document bases using information retrieval (IR) techniques.

    • Copyright © Cambridge University Press 20072007Cambridge University Press
References (66)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    YACINE REZGUI. 2007. Text-based domain ontology building using Tf-Idf and metric clusters techniques. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 22: doi: 10.1017/S0269888907001130
    YACINE REZGUI. 2007. Text-based domain ontology building using Tf-Idf and metric clusters techniques. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 22: doi: 10.1017/S0269888907001130
  • Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return