|
Akoumianakis D., Grammenos D. & Stephanidis C.2001. User interface adaptation: Evaluation perspectives. In User interfaces for All, Stephanidis C.(ed.). Erlbaum, 339–352.
Google Scholar
|
|
Alpert S. R. & Vergo J. G.2007. User-centered evaluation of personalized web sites: What’s unique? In Human Computer Interaction Research in Web Design and Evaluation, Zaphiris P. & Kurniawan S.(eds). Idea Group, 257–272.
Google Scholar
|
|
Ammenwerth E., Iller C. & Mansmann U.2003. Can evaluation studies benefit from triangulation? A case study. International Journal of Medical Informatics70(2/3),237–248.
Google Scholar
|
|
Benbunan-Fich R.2001. Using protocol analysis to evaluate the usability of a commercial web site. Information & Management39(2), 151–163.
Google Scholar
|
|
Benyon D. & Murray D.1993. Adaptive systems: From intelligent tutoring to autonomous agents. Knowledge-Based Systems6(4), 197–219.
Google Scholar
|
|
Bohnenberger T., Jameson A., Krüger A. & Butz A.2002. Location-aware shopping assistance: Evaluation of a decision-theoretic approach. Lecture Notes in Computer Science2411, 155–169.
Google Scholar
|
|
BSI.1998. ISO 9241-11: Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals. British Standards Institution.
Google Scholar
|
|
Buchauer A., Pohl U., Kurzel N. & Haux R.1999. Mobilizing a health professional’s Workstation: Results of an evaluation study. International Journal of Medical Informatics54, 105–114.
Google Scholar
|
|
Cawsey A. J., Jones R. B. & Pearson J.2000. The evaluation of a personalised health information system for patients with cancer. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction10, 47–72.
Google Scholar
|
|
Chesnais P. R., Mucklo M. J. & Sheena J. A.1995. The Fishwrap personalized news system. Paper Presented at the Second International Workshop on Community Networking ‘Integrated Multimedia Services to the Home’,Princeton, USA.
Google Scholar
|
|
Cheverst K., Byun H. E., Fitton D., Sas C., Kray C. & Villar N.2005. Exploring issues of user model transparency and proactive behaviour in an office environment control system. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction15, 235–273.
Google Scholar
|
|
Chin D. N.2001. Empirical evaluation of user models and user-adapted systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction11, 181–194.
Google Scholar
|
|
Cronbach L. J.1951. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika16(3),297–334.
Google Scholar
|
|
Davis F. D., Bagozzi R. P. & Warshaw P. R.1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science35, 982–1003.
Google Scholar
|
|
De Jong M. D. T. & Schellens P. J.1997. Reader-focused text evaluation. An overview of goals and methods. Journal of Business and Technical Communication11(4), 402–432.
Google Scholar
|
|
Dicks R. S.2002. Mis-usability: On the uses and misuses of usability testing. Paper Presented at the 20th Annual International Conference on Computer Documentation, Toronto, Canada.
Google Scholar
|
|
Ericsson K. A. & Simon H. A.1993. Protocol Analysis. MIT Press.
Google Scholar
|
|
Field A., Hartel P. & Mooij W.2001. Personal DJ, an open architecture for personalised content delivery. Paper Presented at the Tenth International Conference World Wide Web, Hong Kong.
Google Scholar
|
|
Gates K. F., Lawhead P. B. & Wilkins D. E.1998. Toward an adaptive www: A case study in customised hypermedia. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia4, 89–113.
Google Scholar
|
|
Gena C. & Torre I.2004. The importance of adaptivity to provide onboard services: A preliminary evaluation of an adaptive tourist information service onboard vehicles. Applied Artificial Intelligence18(6),549–580.
Google Scholar
|
|
Gena C.2005. Methods and techniques for the evaluation of user-adaptive systems. Knowledge Engineering Review20(1), 1–37.
Google Scholar
|
|
Gena C. & Weibelzahl S.2007. Usability engineering for the adaptive web. In The Adaptive Web, Brusilovsky P.,Kobsa A. & Nejdl W. (eds). Springer-Verlag, 720–762.
Google Scholar
|
|
Goren-Bar D., Graziola I., Kuflik T., Pianesi F., Rocchi C., Stock O. & Zancanaro M.2005. I like it: An affective interface for a multimodal museum guide. Retrieved on 20 April 2006 from http://peach.itc.it/papers/gorenbar2005.pdf
Google Scholar
|
|
Gregor P., Dickinson A., Macaffer A. & Andreasen P.2003. Seeword: A personal word processing environment for dyslexic computer users. British Journal of Educational Technology34(3),341–355.
Google Scholar
|
|
Hartson H. R., Andre T. S. & Williges R. C.2003. Criteria for evaluating usability evaluation methods. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction15(1), 145–181.
Google Scholar
|
|
Henderson R., Rickwood D. & Roberts P.1998. The beta test of an electronic supermarket. Interacting with Computers10, 385–399.
Google Scholar
|
|
Herder E.2006. Forward, Back and Home Again. Analyzing User Behaviour on the Web. University of Twente.
Google Scholar
|
|
Hertzum M. & Jacobsen N. E.2003. The evaluator effect: A chilling fact about usability evaluation methods. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction15(1), 183–204.
Google Scholar
|
|
Höök K.1997. Evaluating the utility and usability of an adaptive hypermedia system. Paper Presented at IUI '97, Orlando, USA.
Google Scholar
|
|
Höök K.2000. Steps to take before intelligent user interfaces become real. Interacting with Computers12(4), 409–426.
Google Scholar
|
|
Hvannberg E. T., Law E. L., Lárusdóttir M. K.2007. Heuristic evaluation: Comparing ways of finding and reporting usability problems. Interacting with Computers19, 225–240.
Google Scholar
|
|
Hyldegaard J. & Seiden P.2004. My E-journal: Exploring the usefulness of personalized access to scholarly articles and services. Information Research9(3), paper 181. Available at http://InformationR.net/ir/9–3/paper181.html
Google Scholar
|
|
ISO.1999. ISO 13407: Human-Centered Design Processes for Interactive Systems, International Standard Organizations.
Google Scholar
|
|
Jameson A.2003. Adaptive interfaces and agents. In Human-Computer Interaction Handbook, Jacko J. A. & Sears A. (eds). Erlbaum, 305–330.
Google Scholar
|
|
Jameson A.2006. Adaptive interfaces and agents. In Human-Computer Interaction Handbook (2nd edn), Jacko J. A. & Sears A. (eds). Erlbaum, 433–458.
Google Scholar
|
|
Jensen A. L., Boll P. S., Thysen I. & Pathak B. K.2000. Pl@nteInfo®: A web-based system for personalised decision support in crop management. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture25, 271–293.
Google Scholar
|
|
Kaasinen E.2003. User needs for location aware mobile services. Personal Ubiquitous Computing7(1), 70–79.
Google Scholar
|
|
Karat C. M., Brodie C., Karat J., Vergo J. & Alpert S. R.2003. Personalizing the user experience on ibm.Com. IBM Systems Journal42(4), 686–701.
Google Scholar
|
|
Ketamo H.2003. Xtask: An adaptable learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning19(3), 360–370.
Google Scholar
|
|
Kitchenham B. A., Pfleeger S. L., Pickard L. M., Jones P. W., Hoaglin D. C., El Emam K. & Rosenberg J.2002. Preliminary guidelines for empirical research in software engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering28(8), 721–734.
Google Scholar
|
|
Kjeldskov J., Graham C., Pedell S., Vetere F., Howard S., Balbo S. & Davies J.2005. Evaluating the usability of a mobile guide: The influence of location, participants and resources. Behaviour & Information Technology24(1), 51–65.
Google Scholar
|
|
Kolari J., Laakko T., Hiltunen T., Ikonen V., Kulju M., Suihkonen R., Toivonen S., & Virtanen T.2004. Context-Aware Services for Mobile Users (Technology and User Experiences), VTT publications 539.
Google Scholar
|
|
Kramer J., Noronha S. & Vergo J.2000. A user-centered design approach to personalization. Communications of the ACM43(8), 45–48.
Google Scholar
|
|
Lentz L. & De Jong M. D. T.1997. The evaluation of text quality: Expert-focused and reader-focused methods compared. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication40(3), 224–234.
Google Scholar
|
|
Magoulas G. D., Chen S. Y. & Papanikolaou K. A.2003. Integrating layered and heuristic evaluation for adaptive learning environments. Paper Presented at the Second Workshop on Empirical Evaluation of Adaptive Systems Held in Conjunction with User Modelling 2003, Pittsburg, USA.
Google Scholar
|
|
Maguire M.2001. Methods to support human-centred design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies55(4), 587–634.
Google Scholar
|
|
Miles M. B. & Huberman A. M.1994. Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd edn), Sage.
Google Scholar
|
|
Morgan D. L.1996. Focus groups. Annual Review of Sociology, 22, 129–152.
Google Scholar
|
|
Muntean C. H. & McManis J.2006. The value of QoE-based adaptation approach in educational hypermedia: Empirical evaluation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science4018, 121–130.
Google Scholar
|
|
Nahl D.1998. Ethnography of novices’ first use of web search engines: Affective control in cognitive processing. Internet Reference Services Quarterly3(2), 51–72.
Google Scholar
|
|
NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. 2001. Undertaking Systematic Reviews of Research on Effectiveness, University of York.
Google Scholar
|
|
Pateli A. G., Giaglis G. M. & Spinellis D. D.2005. Trial evaluation of wireless info-communication and indoor location-based services in exhibition shows. Advances in Informatics3746, 199–210.
Google Scholar
|
|
Patton M. Q.2002. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, (3rd edn), Sage.
Google Scholar
|
|
Savage P.1996. User interface evaluation in an iterative design process: A comparison of three techniques. Paper presented at CHI'96, Vancouver, Canada.
Google Scholar
|
|
Schmidt-Belz B. & Poslad S.2003. User validation of a mobile tourism service. Paper Presented at the Workshop on HCI in Mobile Guides, Udine, Italy.
Google Scholar
|
|
Smith H., Fitzpatrick G. & Rogers Y.2004. Eliciting reactive and reflective feedback for a social communication tool: A multi-session approach. Paper Presented at Designing Interactive Systems: Across the Spectrum, Cambridge, USA.
Google Scholar
|
|
Sodergard C., Aaltonen M., Hagman S., Hiirsalmi M., Jarvinen T., Kaasinen E., Kinnunen T., Kolari J., Kunnas J. & Tammela A.1999. Integrated multimedia publishing: Combining TV and newspaper content on personal channels. Computer Networks: the International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking31, 1111–1128.
Google Scholar
|
|
Spector P. E.1992. Summated Rating Scale Construction, Sage.
Google Scholar
|
|
Stary C. & Totter A.2003. Measuring the adaptability of universal accessible systems. Behaviour & Information Technology22(2), 101–116.
Google Scholar
|
|
Stein A.1997. Usability and assessments of multimodal interaction in the SPEAK! System: An experimental case study. The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia3, 159–180.
Google Scholar
|
|
Su L. T.1992. Evaluation measures for interactive information retrieval. Information Processing and Management28(4), 503–516.
Google Scholar
|
|
Van den Haak M. J., De Jong M. D. T. & Schellens P. J.2003. Retrospective vs. concurrent think-aloud protocols: Testing the usability of an online library catalogue. Behaviour & Information Technology22(5), 339–351.
Google Scholar
|
|
Van den Haak M. J., De Jong M. D. T. & Schellens P. J.2004. Employing think-aloud protocols and constructive interaction to test the usability of online library catalogues: A methodological comparison. Interacting with Computers16, 1153–1170.
Google Scholar
|
|
Van der Geest T.2004. Beyond accessibility: Comparing three website usability test methods for people with impairments. Paper Presented at HCI. 2004: Design for Life, Leeds, England.
Google Scholar
|
|
Van Velsen L., Van der Geest T. & Klaassen R.2007. Testing the usability of a personalized system: Comparing the use of interviews, questionnaires and thinking-aloud. Paper Presented at the IEEE Professional Communication Conference, Seattle, USA.
Google Scholar
|
|
Venkatesh V., Morris M. G., Davis G. B. & Davis F. D.2003. User acceptance of information technology: Towards a unified view. MIS Quarterly27(3), 425–478.
Google Scholar
|
|
Virzi R. A., Sokolov J. L. & Karis D.1996. Usability problem identification using both low- and high-fidelity prototypes. Paper Presented at the SIGHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Common Ground, Vancouver, Canada.
Google Scholar
|
|
Vredenburg K., Mao J., Smith P. W. & Carey T.2002. A survey of user-centered design practice. CHI Letters4(1), 471–478.
Google Scholar
|
|
Walker M., Takayama L. & Landay J. A.2002. High-fidelity or low-fidelity, paper or computer? Choosing attributes when testing web prototypes. Paper Presented at the 46th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Baltimore, USA.
Google Scholar
|
|
Weibelzahl S., Lippitsch S. & Weber G.2002. Advantages, opportunities, and limits of empirical evaluations: Evaluating adaptive systems. Künstliche Intelligenz3(2), 17–20.
Google Scholar
|
|
Weibelzahl S.2003. Evaluation of Adaptive Systems. PhD thesis, University of Trier.
Google Scholar
|
|
Weibelzahl S.2005. Problems and pitfalls in the evaluation of adaptive systems. In Adaptable and Adaptive Hypermedia Systems, Chen S. Y. & Magoulas G. D. (eds). IRM Press, 285–299.
Google Scholar
|
|
Weibelzahl S., Jedlitschka A. & Ayari B.2006. Eliciting requirements for a adaptive decision support system through structured user interviews. Paper Presented at the User Centered Design and Evaluation Workshop Held in Conjunction with Adaptive Hypermedia '06, Dublin, Ireland.
Google Scholar
|
