Search
2008 Volume 23
Article Contents
RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

Value creation: the future of knowledge management

More Information
  • Absract: The paper provides a review of knowledge management (KM) literature with a focus on recent value creation trends of the KM discipline. The review spans a large spectrum of KM research ranging from the ‘soft’ (socio-organizational) to technical dimensions of KM, published in the academic and trade literature. An interpretive stance is adopted so as to provide a holistic understanding and interpretation of organizational KM research and models. Value creation is grounded in the appropriate combination of human network, social capital, intellectual capital, and technology assets, facilitated by a culture of change. It is argued that to be effective organizations need not only to negotiate their migration from a knowledge sharing to a knowledge creation culture, but also to create sustained organizational and societal values. The latter form the foundation of the proposed ‘knowledge value creation’ concept and represent key organizational and societal challenges faced by modern organizations.
  • 加载中
  • Alavi M. & Leidner D.2001. Review: Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues.MIS Quarterly25(1), 107–136.

    Google Scholar

    Allen V.1999. The art and practice of being a revolutionary.Journal of Knowledge Management3(2), 121–132.

    Google Scholar

    Allen V.2003. The Future of Knowledge Increasing Prosperity through Value Networks. Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar

    Aranda D. A. & Molina-Fernandez L. M.2002. Determinants of innovation through a knowledge-based theory lens.Industrial Management & Data Systems102(5), 289–296.

    Google Scholar

    Baskerville R. & Dulipovici A.2006. The theoretical foundations of knowledge management.Knowledge Management Research & Practice4(2),83–105.

    Google Scholar

    Benjamins V. R., Fensel D., Decker S. & Perez A. G.1999. (KA)2: building ontologies for the Internet: a mid-term report.International Journal of Human-Computer Studies51(3), 687–712.

    Google Scholar

    Blair M. M. & Wallman S. M. H.2001. Unseen Wealth: Report of the Broolings Task Force on Intangibles. Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar

    Bolisani E. & Scarso E.1999. Information technology management: A knowledge-based perspective. Technovation19, 209–217.

    Google Scholar

    Bontis N., Dragonetti N., Jacobsen K. & Roos G.1999. The knowledge toolbox: A review of the tools available to measure and manage intangible resources. European Management Journal17(4), 391–402.

    Google Scholar

    Brown J. & Duguid. P.1998. Organizing knowledge. California Management Review40(3), 90–112.

    Google Scholar

    Burrell G. & Morgan G.1979. Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis. Heineman.

    Google Scholar

    Burrows G. R., Drummond D. L. & Martinsons M. G.2005. Knowledge management in China.Communications of the ACM48(4), 73–76.

    Google Scholar

    Chase R. L.1997. Knowledge management benchmarks. Journal of Knowledge Management1(1), 83–92.

    Google Scholar

    Chatzkel J.2004. Establishing a global KM initiative: The Wipro story. Journal of Knowledge Management8(2), 6–18.

    Google Scholar

    Choo C. W.1999. The art of scanning the environment. ASIS Bulletin Pre-print www.choo.fis.utoronto.ca/FIS/ResPub/ASISbulletin/default.html

    Google Scholar

    Choo C. W.2003. Perspectives on managing knowledge in organizations. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly37(1–2), 205–220.

    Google Scholar

    Christiansson P.2003. Next Generation Knowledge Management Systems for the Construction Industry, CIB W78 Construction IT Bridging the Distance, Auckland, April 23–25.

    Google Scholar

    Cohen D. & Prusak L.2001. In Good Company: How Social Capital Makes Organizations Work. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar

    Danchev A.2006. Social Capital and Sustainable Behaviour of the Firm, Industrial Management & Data Systems106(7), 953–965.

    Google Scholar

    Davenport T. & Prusak L.1998. Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar

    Davenport T. H., DeLong D. W. & Beers M. C.1998. Successful Knowledge Management Projects. Sloan Management Review39(2), 43–57.

    Google Scholar

    Davis F. D.1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly13(3), 319–340.

    Google Scholar

    Deetz S.1996. Describing differences in approaches to organization science: Rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy. Organization Science7(2), 191–207.

    Google Scholar

    Denning S.1999. Seven basics of knowledge management. Communication Technology Decisions. Autumn/Winter(1).

    Google Scholar

    Despres C. & Chauvel D.1999. Knowledge management(s). Journal of Knowledge Management3(2), 110–123.

    Google Scholar

    Earl M.2001. Knowledge management strategies: Toward a taxonomy. Journal of Management Information Systems18(1), 215–233.

    Google Scholar

    Firestone J. M. & McElroy M. W.2003. Key Issues in the New Knowledge Management. Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar

    Gebert H., Geib M., Kolbe L. & Brenner W.2003. Knowledge-enabled customer relationship management: Integrating customer relationship management and knowledge management concepts. Journal of Knowledge Management7(5), 107–123.

    Google Scholar

    Gilbert M. & Cordey-Hayes M.1996. Understanding the process of knowledge transfer to achieve successful technological innovation. Technovation16(6), 301–312.

    Google Scholar

    Gourlay S.2003. The SECI model of knowledge creation: Some empirical shortcomings. The Fourth European Conference on Knowledge Management. Oxford, UK, 377–386.

    Google Scholar

    Hansen M. T., Nohria N. & Tierney T.1999. What’s your strategy for managing knowledge?Harvard Business Review77, 101–116.

    Google Scholar

    Hedlund G.1994. A model of knowledge management and the N-form corporation. Strategic Management Journal15, 73–90.

    Google Scholar

    Hofstede G. H.2001. Culture’s consequences: Comparing values. Behaviors, Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Sage.

    Google Scholar

    Holaspple C. W. & Joshi. K. D.2003. A knowledge management ontology. In Handbook on Knowledge Management, Holaspple C. W. (ed.). Springer-Verlag, 89–124.

    Google Scholar

    Huseby M. & Chou S. T.2003. Applying a knowledge-focused management philosophy to immature economies. Industrial Management & Data Systems102(1), 17–25.

    Google Scholar

    Huysman M. & Wulf V.2006. IT to support knowledge sharing in communities, towards a social capital analysis. Journal of Information Technology21, 40–51.

    Google Scholar

    Koenig M. E. D.2002. The third stage of KM emerges. KMWorld11(3), 20–21.

    Google Scholar

    KPMG1998. Case Study: Building a Platform for Corporate Knowledge. KPMG Management Consulting.

    Google Scholar

    Lee J.2001. The impact of knowledge sharing, organizational capability and partnership quality on IS outsourcing success. Information and Management38(2001), 323–335.

    Google Scholar

    Lee S. M. & Hong S.2002. An enterprise-wide knowledge management infrastructure. Industrial Management & Data Systems102(1), 17–25.

    Google Scholar

    Lesser E. & Prusak L.1999. Communities of practice, social capital and organizational knowledge. Information Systems Review1(1), 3–10.

    Google Scholar

    Lesser E. L.2000. Knowledge and Social Capital: Foundations and Applications. Butterworth Heinemann.

    Google Scholar

    Liebowitz J. & Suen C. Y.2000. Developing knowledge management metrics for measuring intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital1(1), 54–67.

    Google Scholar

    Løwendahl B. R., Revang Ø. & Fosstenløkken S. M.2001. Knowledge and value creation in professional service firms: A framework for analysis. Human Relations54(7), 911–931.

    Google Scholar

    Malhotra Y.1999. Beyond ‘Hi-Tech Hidebound’ Knowledge Management: Strategic Information Systems for the New World of Business. Working Paper BRINT Research Institute.

    Google Scholar

    Markus L. M.2001.Toward a theory of knowledge reuse: Types of knowledge reuse situations and factors in reuse success. Journal of Management Information Systems18(1), 57–93.

    Google Scholar

    McAdam R. & Galloway A.2005. Enterprise resource planning and organisational innovation: A management perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems105(3), 280–290.

    Google Scholar

    McAdam R. & McCreedy S.1999. A critical review of knowledge management models. The Learning Organisation6(3), 91–100.

    Google Scholar

    McDermott R. & O’Dell C.2001. Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management5(1), 1367–3270.

    Google Scholar

    Nahapiet J. & Ghoshal S.1998. Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review23(2), 242–266.

    Google Scholar

    Nonaka I. & Takeuchi H.1995. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar

    Nonaka I., Toyama R. & Konno N.2000. SECI, Ba and Leadership: A unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Planning33, 5–34.

    Google Scholar

    O’Dell C. & Grayson C. J.1998. If only we knew what we know: identification and transfer of internal best practices. California Management Review40(3), 154–174.

    Google Scholar

    Okunoye A.2002. Towards a framework for sustainable knowledge management in organisations in developing countries. The IFIP World Computer Congress Canada (WCC2002), Brunnstein K. & Berleur J. (eds). Montreal, Canada, 225–237.

    Google Scholar

    Osterloh M. & Frey B.2000. Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organization Science11(5), 538–550.

    Google Scholar

    Pan S. & Scarbrough H.1998. A socio-technical view of knowledge sharing at Buckman laboratories. Journal of Knowledge Management2(1), 55–66.

    Google Scholar

    Pentland B. T.1995. Information systems and organizational learning: The social epistemology of organizaional knowledge systems. Accounting. Management and Information Technologies5(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar

    Powell T. C. & Dent-Micallef A.1999. Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal18(5), 375–405.

    Google Scholar

    Preiss K., Goldman S. L. & Nagel R. N.1996. Cooperate to Compete: Building Agile Business Relationships. Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar

    Pynadath D. V. & Tambe M.2002. The communicative multiagent team decision problem: Analyzing teamwork theories and models. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research16389–423.

    Google Scholar

    Ramesh V. & Dennis A. R.2002. The Object-Oriented Team: Lessons for Virtual Teams from Global Software Development, HICSS35, Hawaii, 212–221.

    Google Scholar

    Rastogi P. N.2000. Knowledge management and intellectual capital: The new virtuous reality of competitiveness. Human Systems Management19(1), 39–48.

    Google Scholar

    Reddy S. B. & Reddy R.2002. Competitive agility and the challenge of legacy information systems. Industrial Management & Data Systems102(1), 5–16.

    Google Scholar

    Rezgui Y.2001. Review of information and knowledge management practices state of the art in the construction industry. Knowledge Engineering Review16(2), 241–254.

    Google Scholar

    Rezgui Y.2006. Ontology driven knowledge management using information retrieval techniques. Computing in Civil Engineering20(3), 261–270.

    Google Scholar

    Rezgui Y. (2007a) Knowledge systems and value creation: An action research investigation. Industrial Management & Data Systems107(2), 166–182.

    Google Scholar

    Rezgui Y. (2007b) Text-based domain ontology building using TF-IDF and metric clusters techniques. Knowledge Engineering Review22(4), 379–403.

    Google Scholar

    Rezgui Y. (2007c) Exploring virtual team-working effectiveness in the construction sector. Interacting with Computers19(1), 96–112.

    Google Scholar

    Rice J. L. & Rice B. S.2005. The applicability of the SECI model to multi-organisational endeavours: An integrative review. International Journal of Organisational Behaviour9(8), 671–682.

    Google Scholar

    Roberts J.2000. From know-how to show-how? Questioning the role of information and communication technologies in knowledge transfer. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management12(4), 429–443.

    Google Scholar

    Rus I., Lindvall M. & Sinha S. S.2002. Knowledge management in software engineering. IEEE Software19(3), 26–38.

    Google Scholar

    Scarbrough H., Swan J. & Preston J.1999. Knowledge Management: A Literature Review. Institute of Personnel and Development.

    Google Scholar

    Schultze U.1998. Investigating the contradictions in knowledge management. IFIP Conference on Information Systems. Helsinki, 155–174.

    Google Scholar

    Senge P.1990. The Fifth Discipline: The Art & Practice of the Learning Organization. Currency Doubleday.

    Google Scholar

    Simonin B.1999. Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal20(1999), 595–623.

    Google Scholar

    Snowden D.2002. Complex acts of knowing; paradox and descriptive self-awareness. Journal of Knowledge Management6(2), 1–14.

    Google Scholar

    Spender J.-C. 1998. The dynamics of individual and organizational knowledge. In Managerial and Organizational Cognition: Theory, Methods and Research, Eden C. & Spender J.-C. (eds). Sage.

    Google Scholar

    Studer R., Benjamins V. R. & Fensel D.1998.Knowledge engineering: principles and methods. Data & Knowledge Engineering25(1–2), 161–197.

    Google Scholar

    Sveiby K.1999. Industry Led Sharing of Knowledge: The Future of Hi-Tech Education?www.sveiby.com

    Google Scholar

    Tan B., Wei K., Huang W. & Ng G.2000. A dialogue technique to enhance electronic communication in virtual teams. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communications43(2), 153–165.

    Google Scholar

    Teece D.1998. Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Review40(3), 55–79.

    Google Scholar

    Tenkasi R. & Boland R.1996. Exploring knowledge diversity in knowledge intensive firms: A new role for information systems. Journal of Organizational Change Management9(1), 79–91.

    Google Scholar

    Tsai W. & Ghoshal S.1998. Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal41(4), 464–476.

    Google Scholar

    Vaishnavi V. K., Buchanan G. C. & Kuechler W. L.1997. A data/knowledge paradigm for the modeling and design of operations support systems. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering9(2), 275–291.

    Google Scholar

    Van Ryssen S. & Hayes Godar S.2000. Going international without going international: multinational virtual teams. Journal of International Management6, 49–60.

    Google Scholar

    VISION2003. VISION Next Generation Knowledge Management. http://km.aifb.uni-karlsruhe.de/fzi/vision/.

    Google Scholar

    Vorakulpipat C. & Rezgui Y.2006. From knowledge sharing to value creation: three generations of knowledge management. The 2006 IEEE International Engineering Management Conference, Salvador, Brazil, 214–220.

    Google Scholar

    Wagner C., Cheung K., Lee F. & Ip R.2003. Enhancing e-government in developing countries: Managing knowledge through virtual communities. Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries14(4), 1–20.

    Google Scholar

    Warkentin M. & Beranek P. M.1999. Training to improve virtual team communication. Information Systems Journal9271–289.

    Google Scholar

    Wei C. C., Choy C. S. & Yeow P. H. P.2006. KM implementation in Malaysian telecommunication industry: An empirical analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems106(8), 1112–1132.

    Google Scholar

    Wenger E., McDermott R. & Snyder W. M.2002. Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar

    Wetherill M., Rezgui Y., Boddy S., Cooper G.2007. Intra and Inter-organisational knowledge services to promote informed sustainability practices. Computing in Civil Engineering21(2), 78–89.

    Google Scholar

    Wheatcroft J.2000. Organizational change, the story so far. Industrial Management & Data Systems100(1), 5–9.

    Google Scholar

    Whittaker S., Frohlich D. M. & Daly-Jones O.1994. Informal Workplace communication: what is it like and how might we support it? CHI ’94. ACM Press, 131–137.

    Google Scholar

    Wiig K. M.1997. Roles of knowledge-based systems in support of knowledge management. In Knowledge Management and its Integrative Elements, Liebowitz J. & Wilcox L. C. (eds). CRC Press, 69–87.

    Google Scholar

    Wiig K. M.1999. What future knowledge management users may expect. Journal of Knowledge Management3(2), 155–165.

    Google Scholar

    Wiig K. M.2002. New generation knowledge management: What may we expect? Knowledge Research Institutewww.krii.com/downloads/new_gen_km.pdf.

    Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    CHALEE VORAKULPIPAT, YACINE REZGUI. 2008. Value creation: the future of knowledge management. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 23: doi: 10.1017/S0269888908001380
    CHALEE VORAKULPIPAT, YACINE REZGUI. 2008. Value creation: the future of knowledge management. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 23: doi: 10.1017/S0269888908001380

Article Metrics

Article views(28) PDF downloads(521)

Other Articles By Authors

RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

Value creation: the future of knowledge management

The Knowledge Engineering Review  23 Article number: 10.1017/S0269888908001380  (2008)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Absract: The paper provides a review of knowledge management (KM) literature with a focus on recent value creation trends of the KM discipline. The review spans a large spectrum of KM research ranging from the ‘soft’ (socio-organizational) to technical dimensions of KM, published in the academic and trade literature. An interpretive stance is adopted so as to provide a holistic understanding and interpretation of organizational KM research and models. Value creation is grounded in the appropriate combination of human network, social capital, intellectual capital, and technology assets, facilitated by a culture of change. It is argued that to be effective organizations need not only to negotiate their migration from a knowledge sharing to a knowledge creation culture, but also to create sustained organizational and societal values. The latter form the foundation of the proposed ‘knowledge value creation’ concept and represent key organizational and societal challenges faced by modern organizations.

    • Copyright © Cambridge University Press 20082008Cambridge University Press
References (97)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    CHALEE VORAKULPIPAT, YACINE REZGUI. 2008. Value creation: the future of knowledge management. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 23: doi: 10.1017/S0269888908001380
    CHALEE VORAKULPIPAT, YACINE REZGUI. 2008. Value creation: the future of knowledge management. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 23: doi: 10.1017/S0269888908001380
  • Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return